Really astounding the level of technology the Germans were producing, beleaguered as they were - they were thirty, forty years ahead of the rest of the world ... except in the nuclear field. IF Hitler hadn't cut their funding for that, one shudders to think. Thankfully, he was a Sci-Fi fan, and loved the "Wonder Weapons."
@Bb-63fan10 күн бұрын
Don’t you hate premature detonation?
@tedsmith613712 күн бұрын
What was the success rate of depth charge attacks? How would you know for sure if you destroyed a sub?
@stopthephilosophicalzombie901717 күн бұрын
Titanium, not tungsten.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman22 күн бұрын
Great video...👍
@wiwihfirman849923 күн бұрын
Imagine human evolutions from bow and arrow into tank shells only to be re-evilute back to arrow shaped round from bow and arrow era 😂
@simonmccarthy551223 күн бұрын
Maybe check the animation of the bombs dropping at the end of the video. I believe that they dropped in a predefined sequence from different parts of the bomb-bay, so that the remaining bombs didn't affect the plane's centre of gravity. Dropping from the front to the back as in the video would have caused the plane to pitch up and stall/crash.
@mikedunn779524 күн бұрын
Another case of too little,too late..
@EnterpriseXI26 күн бұрын
One thing I’m not understanding is what controlled the missile in flight? Did the rear fins have control surfaces?
@richardvernon31727 күн бұрын
The Original Monica system design started in 1941 for a audio warning system that gave a rapidly increasing tone in the bomber crew's headset if there was an aircraft behind the bomber that was decreasing in range. Fitting of it to RAF Bombers did start in early 1943, but was then delayed when it was found to jam the Oboe Blind Bombing System. After Oboe was modified to overcome the issue by June 1943, rapid installation of Monica was done on the RAF bomber force. However what was originally designed for bombers flying on individual routing to a target was now being used on bombers flying in a concentrated Bomber Stream and the Monica equipment was going off all of the time as the Bombers weaved around in the Stream. Most bomber crews got so pissed off with this distraction that they turned the equipment off. By September 1943, Bomber Command and the equipment's designers at Telecommunications Research Establishment (TRE) realised that Monica Mark 1 (AKA Audio Monica) was a Failure and TRE came up with Monica Mark III (AKA Visual Monica) which is the system shown on the Video. It used the CRT display and receiver systems from the ASV Mk 2 radar located and operated by the Wireless Operator on the Bomber (the equipment being recycled was being phased out of service with Coastal Command). The first 50 system built were issued to 61 and 106 Squadrons of 5 Group Bomber Command in late October 1943. The initial reaction from the Squadron's was the equipment was very easy to use and German night fighters manoeuvring in behind the bomber were easily noted and evaded. A crash program was instigated to modify as many Monica equipped aircraft as possible, abet there were only 600 CRT / Receiver sets available from UK stocks and 200 of them were required for the Mosquito night fighters planned for Bomber Support in 100 Group (the Mosquito Bombers also got the Equipment in the Mark 1 format which worked OK as they didn't fly in the Bomber Stream). Aircraft fitted with the H2S Bombing and Navigation radar didn't get Monica as a system that displayed close in contacts to the underside of the Bomber using the H2S radar was developed called Fishpond and that was fitted to Bomber Command Pathfinder aircraft in October 1943 onwards. Flensburg didn't become operational in a major way until March 1944 and the Bomber Command Operational Research Section who monitored Loss rates of aircraft by types of special equipment fitted to aircraft did note that losses of aircraft fitted with Monica which had been lower than aircraft not fitted with it was changing rapidly throughout April and May 1944 and they suspected the Germans were homing on it. Of Course this was confirmed when the JU-88 was captured. Trials found out how effective Flensburg was and when attempts to modify Monica were made to make it more difficult home on failed, it was removed from all of the Aircraft which operated in the Bomber Stream. Aircraft that didn't operate in a Bomber Stream like the Mosquitos retained the equipment as the primary reason it was removed was to avoid giving away the position of a Bomber Stream from decoy and spoof aircraft that were attempting to spilt the German night defences. The USAAF actually built their own copy of Monica and fitted it to their escort fighters. It was based on the Monica Mark 1, but used a flashing light and a bell to give a warning. The US version of Monica in a modified form ended the war!!! Four of them were each fitted to a pair of bombs dropped on Japan in August 1945. They were the radar fuze system for the Atomic Bombs!!
@4rdF1Hunny29 күн бұрын
I didn’t see anything trimaran, but I did see a catamaran.
@mirola73Ай бұрын
Hesh, that's why tanks have spall liners on the inside
@NorthWindAerialImagingАй бұрын
Could I possibly use the portion about HEAT rounds in a video I'm doing on drone warfare? It's the perfect graphic I need. Would absolutely give credit and a link to your channel.
@Muddy_alex6850Ай бұрын
Bro said kilometer and kilograms ☠️☠️☠️
@viewer-jf3smАй бұрын
Thank you for the content ❤🎉
@biswojitbhuyan8063Ай бұрын
Is this device is telemeter
@the3rdid485Ай бұрын
Hey you should make the background audio so loud and annoying we can't hear the narration. Cool.
@jimmysweat2200Ай бұрын
Acquired
@jimmysweat2200Ай бұрын
X marks the spot 🎯
@ArcaneMontaneАй бұрын
Now do USS Liberty
@sl0doodles513Ай бұрын
Great Now let's make sure gaijin add it on the me 262
@Trollpharius_XXАй бұрын
Ok so if you're fighting, take down the rangefinder then go as far as possible
@BdogFinal14Ай бұрын
The US Navy has recognized it deficient in firepower for current amphibious operations. They have considered bringing back the Battleship or the 1990s Arsenal Ship concept. I believe a modernized LSM(R) would be perfect for the role.
@brianredmond4919Ай бұрын
Slight correction - craft had 0.5 hp motor not 1.5.
@ryanbarone8072Ай бұрын
0:00 Mmm yes, a sparrow on the wing tip of an F16.
@og54622 ай бұрын
0:21 - 0:31
@jimmydolphin96532 ай бұрын
I still cant get my head round the fact that the molten metal gets through the armor in less than a fraction of a second. No matter how hot it is how can it possibly melt through that quick? Is anyone able to help clear this up? Maybe im just nieve as to how fast metal melts but in my head it makes no sense 😂
@yet.another.yt.nobody-fm3qzАй бұрын
It's not molten, please read the pinned comment.
@olegvit12022 ай бұрын
get ready russians
@2Glm0052 ай бұрын
i crave the forbiden heat signitue
@user-ui9mt3gj5o2 ай бұрын
My grandma 1st husband died on this submarine
@shockwave62132 ай бұрын
I think the idea is great but they went about it wrong. They should have made the launchers with 2 horizontal rows so it created a wide wall of wires along the entire length of the ship instead of making a single dense cloud of them.
@user-it3gp4vm1z2 ай бұрын
The power of analog mechanisms
@red_d8492 ай бұрын
501st like
@lofficieldufishe98232 ай бұрын
Niceeee, this is a lot better man. Keep up the great work
@_monti1422 ай бұрын
yeah i though so on the first video that the audio was weird
@FreedomFighterEx2 ай бұрын
Appreciated the new audio balancing. Top job, lad 👍
@h312122 ай бұрын
You acknowledged feedback and immediately corrected the problem, now your video is back at your usual high standard. Now THAT is the trait of outstanding work ethic and humility.
@Frogma9852 ай бұрын
GOATED
@Tank50us2 ай бұрын
Could you imagine if any of these were still around and allowed people to jump in and try it out?
@ThaHouseKid2 ай бұрын
dont care if its a re-upload ill watch again cause this content is 🔥🔥
@zepatheticone33692 ай бұрын
I thought he had uploaded again man...
@mixererunio17572 ай бұрын
It's much better now! Thanks a lot for your work!
@TheEvilFoxy2 ай бұрын
Thank you for considering community feedback.
@Superfurzman2 ай бұрын
New audio is perfect now! thanks for reuploading!
@nullentrophy2 ай бұрын
❤
@reubensandwich92492 ай бұрын
This looks like more fun than trap shooting from a moving platform.
@isaacgonzalez46062 ай бұрын
much better, thanks for the upload
@leesengwee46922 ай бұрын
This would make big bucks if it were to be opened to the public.
Пікірлер
As a former EOD, perfect
As the founding fathers intended ....
Really astounding the level of technology the Germans were producing, beleaguered as they were - they were thirty, forty years ahead of the rest of the world ... except in the nuclear field. IF Hitler hadn't cut their funding for that, one shudders to think. Thankfully, he was a Sci-Fi fan, and loved the "Wonder Weapons."
Don’t you hate premature detonation?
What was the success rate of depth charge attacks? How would you know for sure if you destroyed a sub?
Titanium, not tungsten.
Great video...👍
Imagine human evolutions from bow and arrow into tank shells only to be re-evilute back to arrow shaped round from bow and arrow era 😂
Maybe check the animation of the bombs dropping at the end of the video. I believe that they dropped in a predefined sequence from different parts of the bomb-bay, so that the remaining bombs didn't affect the plane's centre of gravity. Dropping from the front to the back as in the video would have caused the plane to pitch up and stall/crash.
Another case of too little,too late..
One thing I’m not understanding is what controlled the missile in flight? Did the rear fins have control surfaces?
The Original Monica system design started in 1941 for a audio warning system that gave a rapidly increasing tone in the bomber crew's headset if there was an aircraft behind the bomber that was decreasing in range. Fitting of it to RAF Bombers did start in early 1943, but was then delayed when it was found to jam the Oboe Blind Bombing System. After Oboe was modified to overcome the issue by June 1943, rapid installation of Monica was done on the RAF bomber force. However what was originally designed for bombers flying on individual routing to a target was now being used on bombers flying in a concentrated Bomber Stream and the Monica equipment was going off all of the time as the Bombers weaved around in the Stream. Most bomber crews got so pissed off with this distraction that they turned the equipment off. By September 1943, Bomber Command and the equipment's designers at Telecommunications Research Establishment (TRE) realised that Monica Mark 1 (AKA Audio Monica) was a Failure and TRE came up with Monica Mark III (AKA Visual Monica) which is the system shown on the Video. It used the CRT display and receiver systems from the ASV Mk 2 radar located and operated by the Wireless Operator on the Bomber (the equipment being recycled was being phased out of service with Coastal Command). The first 50 system built were issued to 61 and 106 Squadrons of 5 Group Bomber Command in late October 1943. The initial reaction from the Squadron's was the equipment was very easy to use and German night fighters manoeuvring in behind the bomber were easily noted and evaded. A crash program was instigated to modify as many Monica equipped aircraft as possible, abet there were only 600 CRT / Receiver sets available from UK stocks and 200 of them were required for the Mosquito night fighters planned for Bomber Support in 100 Group (the Mosquito Bombers also got the Equipment in the Mark 1 format which worked OK as they didn't fly in the Bomber Stream). Aircraft fitted with the H2S Bombing and Navigation radar didn't get Monica as a system that displayed close in contacts to the underside of the Bomber using the H2S radar was developed called Fishpond and that was fitted to Bomber Command Pathfinder aircraft in October 1943 onwards. Flensburg didn't become operational in a major way until March 1944 and the Bomber Command Operational Research Section who monitored Loss rates of aircraft by types of special equipment fitted to aircraft did note that losses of aircraft fitted with Monica which had been lower than aircraft not fitted with it was changing rapidly throughout April and May 1944 and they suspected the Germans were homing on it. Of Course this was confirmed when the JU-88 was captured. Trials found out how effective Flensburg was and when attempts to modify Monica were made to make it more difficult home on failed, it was removed from all of the Aircraft which operated in the Bomber Stream. Aircraft that didn't operate in a Bomber Stream like the Mosquitos retained the equipment as the primary reason it was removed was to avoid giving away the position of a Bomber Stream from decoy and spoof aircraft that were attempting to spilt the German night defences. The USAAF actually built their own copy of Monica and fitted it to their escort fighters. It was based on the Monica Mark 1, but used a flashing light and a bell to give a warning. The US version of Monica in a modified form ended the war!!! Four of them were each fitted to a pair of bombs dropped on Japan in August 1945. They were the radar fuze system for the Atomic Bombs!!
I didn’t see anything trimaran, but I did see a catamaran.
Hesh, that's why tanks have spall liners on the inside
Could I possibly use the portion about HEAT rounds in a video I'm doing on drone warfare? It's the perfect graphic I need. Would absolutely give credit and a link to your channel.
Bro said kilometer and kilograms ☠️☠️☠️
Thank you for the content ❤🎉
Is this device is telemeter
Hey you should make the background audio so loud and annoying we can't hear the narration. Cool.
Acquired
X marks the spot 🎯
Now do USS Liberty
Great Now let's make sure gaijin add it on the me 262
Ok so if you're fighting, take down the rangefinder then go as far as possible
The US Navy has recognized it deficient in firepower for current amphibious operations. They have considered bringing back the Battleship or the 1990s Arsenal Ship concept. I believe a modernized LSM(R) would be perfect for the role.
Slight correction - craft had 0.5 hp motor not 1.5.
0:00 Mmm yes, a sparrow on the wing tip of an F16.
0:21 - 0:31
I still cant get my head round the fact that the molten metal gets through the armor in less than a fraction of a second. No matter how hot it is how can it possibly melt through that quick? Is anyone able to help clear this up? Maybe im just nieve as to how fast metal melts but in my head it makes no sense 😂
It's not molten, please read the pinned comment.
get ready russians
i crave the forbiden heat signitue
My grandma 1st husband died on this submarine
I think the idea is great but they went about it wrong. They should have made the launchers with 2 horizontal rows so it created a wide wall of wires along the entire length of the ship instead of making a single dense cloud of them.
The power of analog mechanisms
501st like
Niceeee, this is a lot better man. Keep up the great work
yeah i though so on the first video that the audio was weird
Appreciated the new audio balancing. Top job, lad 👍
You acknowledged feedback and immediately corrected the problem, now your video is back at your usual high standard. Now THAT is the trait of outstanding work ethic and humility.
GOATED
Could you imagine if any of these were still around and allowed people to jump in and try it out?
dont care if its a re-upload ill watch again cause this content is 🔥🔥
I thought he had uploaded again man...
It's much better now! Thanks a lot for your work!
Thank you for considering community feedback.
New audio is perfect now! thanks for reuploading!
❤
This looks like more fun than trap shooting from a moving platform.
much better, thanks for the upload
This would make big bucks if it were to be opened to the public.