I love both equally but i do prefer the original from 1933. I think they are both good equally but A: the 1933 film is a lot more influential, B: i watched it first so i have a bit of a bias, C: i think the 1933 has less filler then the 2005 version, D: it has inspired me to be a filmmaker like so many people before me, so i have to give some props to that. I don't hate anyone who prefers the 2005 film over the 1933 film, i just prefer the original.
@Lancom93 сағат бұрын
why they all black?? wtf is this shit
@katarinajodlova4945 сағат бұрын
1940 is better Maxim from 1995 is very old
@MrSv4610 сағат бұрын
1978: a real film adaptation of Adams' book. The dark tones, the spiral easter egg and the clarity of the plot make the film very good. The characters are drawn well - they are very cute, and go through many deadly adventures. There's a lot of blood, but it's on point. I love the movie. 1999-2001: I don't understand. Why was it necessary to follow the plot for the first 8 episodes (I’ll keep silent about skipping half the journey to the hill), and then shoot a complete gag for 2 seasons?! Faiva constantly fell into a trance, it was simply infuriating. Kihar generally became a tame dog, constantly running around with rabbits. The fight went like this: they talked and talked and touched each other a little. Well, is this a fight??? Bigwig, when he got caught in the snare, screamed and screamed and that was it. Director!!! Have you read the book?! ,, Under the mask of blood, vomit and earth, Bigwig looked like a rabbit demon.,, Well??? In short, complete bullshit. I watched it completely. I will never watch it again.
@OdeeOz15 сағат бұрын
Ol' Peter Jackson must have gotten ideas for his scenes from Rankin/Bass, as a kid. 👋👍👍🤠
@themightytitan415715 сағат бұрын
The new ones are well made but i still find the Lynch one more entertaining.
@carloslum5Күн бұрын
1976 > 2006.
@prodigal_rebel_2062Күн бұрын
Lucy from Elfen Lied reminds me a lot of Carrie but I think the former is way more vicious since she can tear people apart into pieces.
@prodigal_rebel_2062Күн бұрын
The animated 1989 movie was way better by a landslide.
@flatcapmanКүн бұрын
I found the 1990 remake was faithful to the Original but added better ideas and also the fate of Barbara making her tough at the end but she ends up disturbed by the end shot I hated the Original actress who played her and she was just as terrible in that souls movie plus ben's fate was better done as a zombie. The Original is a fave don't get me wrong but Savini made it his own while showing not only respect to Romero but his own ideas as well
@fairies47Күн бұрын
First movie just captured the soft and painful melancholy from the book... The second one is all cheap and gibberish...
@SkyUp-zn1fxКүн бұрын
M life was a lie just find about 1970 ver
@AmarZionКүн бұрын
She’s the strongest in the 2002 version
@starshinefeaver2 күн бұрын
This should have never been remade!!!
@user-ld8gb6wd5t2 күн бұрын
Remakes are always horrible they never capture the whole feeling remix are just an embarrassment never do a remake
@yeisonguerrero12752 күн бұрын
KZread brujas brujas
@minyoongi12934 күн бұрын
The new Aaron is not really attractive to me 😭
@ericmonaco45094 күн бұрын
They should remake this movie and have Steven Ogg as Jack Torrence
@danielcantiego93745 күн бұрын
By reading all these comments I got to the conclusion that the remake is , for Haneke's meaning and social commentary, the superior movie. The 97' was just a prototype, that's why it feels way too realistic and authentic, while the 2007 is what the Director wanted it to be in the first place. I understand why everyone clings to the original though , this isn't the kind of franchise that loves it's audience
@TuckerDale895 күн бұрын
After seeing all of them I liked Dune 2000 the best
@Benthenewbie4145 күн бұрын
I'm just gonna say it...I seriously didn't like the kid in the 1997 version. And in truth, the 1997 version, SUCKED!!! The 1980 version of the shining though, is an absolute masterpiece!!! One of my top favorite movies! And it still is today!!!
@skred67926 күн бұрын
Crazy how the 84 Dune looks better 39 years later 🤷🏻♂️
@BrianRumbaoaDisney19986 күн бұрын
Courtesy of EMI Distributors and 20th Century Studios/Disney
@thebomb786 күн бұрын
That 2000 Dune looks ropey as hell
@adamgrey34246 күн бұрын
I prefer the '93 over the '88. I preferred the American actors over the Dutch ones and the ending not as disturbing. Got that with Se7en, The Wicker Man, The Mist, The Prestige, Primal Fear, Oldboy, The Skeleton Key, Buried, and The Omen.
@yeisonguerrero12756 күн бұрын
Juan Jose 🪖 nunca me va a volver a este país y los amigos se quedan solos pobrecito yo los extraño mucho muchísimo te extraño los amo
@michaelsica88396 күн бұрын
1997 was a ripoff of the prior movies; no creativity; a cheesy "love story"; just modern special effects. Awful.
@thegbandbcllc7 күн бұрын
In the 2020 the grandma was a witch herself she just wasn’t evil
@pizzaboy55487 күн бұрын
Wait is it in the same universe?
@jaylinlandry3507 күн бұрын
Can you do 101 Dalmatians cartoon/live action comparison?
@Julzaa8 күн бұрын
I love how this is almost shot-for-shot for the most part of the first-half
@harrisonneves60078 күн бұрын
Like Anthony Perkins said, "A boy's best friend is his mother."
@mabelvelasqueluis47098 күн бұрын
Wili
@wr502310 күн бұрын
Lmao the us ending is ridiculous
@youbian10 күн бұрын
I mean…. kzread.info/dash/bejne/e3161NaOer3LnM4.htmlfeature=shared
@samwhite729110 күн бұрын
Copy just copy never better than Forrest Gump!
@TerranceChilds-ui8nh10 күн бұрын
I haven't seen this movie in a while
@kerickwalters274910 күн бұрын
I prefer the 1978 version
@juancorrea071710 күн бұрын
Por que le cambiaron de nombre de la remake de sadako a Samara que quitan todo el crédito ala sadako por ella existe
@MarieChachaValentineLahe-im7uq11 күн бұрын
The grinch is So cool
@ImmortaledFrame11 күн бұрын
Nahh there’s no way I’m going to sleep in the hotel of the first one (Not because of Jack with an axe) I’m going to live inside my house besides that
@StolasOwl2711 күн бұрын
Rewatching this movie as an actual witch makes me laugh at how they depict us. Don't worry we won't turn you into a mouse, we aren't bald, and we certainly are not ugly.
@handyandyradio12 күн бұрын
The 2005 version was a Hallmark Channel remake. Any wonder it was such crap? 😂
@____________________CCR11 күн бұрын
You’re crap have you ever wonder to appreciate things it doesn’t matter what quality is it, it’s about the hard work put in to it. How would you fell when people laugh at something hard you worked on? Nevertheless, you should take that word back because everything has a way of coming back to you. Plus. If you search about the Poseidon 2006. Google itself called it a “horrible remake”
@JNG15012 күн бұрын
Forrest : We don't got to worry about money anymore. Laal : We don't got to worry about money anymore.....as soon as I get this call scamming centre setup, we'll just take other peoples money.
@alluringming12 күн бұрын
i liked ian mcneice as baron harkonen in 2000 series
@movielover62613 күн бұрын
I feel like releasing it on June 6th, 2006 was a perfect marketing trick. But there’s no point in trying if all you’re doing is making a shot for shot plagiarized remake just with a more sophisticated budget. It’s basically like someone writing a book and then you steal all the credit and change minor details.
@haziqhakim599513 күн бұрын
Do a similar video like this but remove the 1951 Verison. It is kinda inaccurate
@mikep533513 күн бұрын
The newer version by Gus Van Sant was a catastrophe. How could he think something like that could work?
@tallito7814 күн бұрын
Simplemente la película de 1976 NO TIENE COMPARACIÓN, ES UNA OBRA MAESTRA
@michaelgraves594114 күн бұрын
Question 🚢⛴🛳⛵️🛶⚓️🌊🚤😂😁🛳 1:56 morning we have a great 👍 we love it we stopped Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa@aaaaaa@@@y Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa was your y,,! What, a good morning 😃🤯😭🤡😢😢🤒🥴😵 5:40
Пікірлер
I love both equally but i do prefer the original from 1933. I think they are both good equally but A: the 1933 film is a lot more influential, B: i watched it first so i have a bit of a bias, C: i think the 1933 has less filler then the 2005 version, D: it has inspired me to be a filmmaker like so many people before me, so i have to give some props to that. I don't hate anyone who prefers the 2005 film over the 1933 film, i just prefer the original.
why they all black?? wtf is this shit
1940 is better Maxim from 1995 is very old
1978: a real film adaptation of Adams' book. The dark tones, the spiral easter egg and the clarity of the plot make the film very good. The characters are drawn well - they are very cute, and go through many deadly adventures. There's a lot of blood, but it's on point. I love the movie. 1999-2001: I don't understand. Why was it necessary to follow the plot for the first 8 episodes (I’ll keep silent about skipping half the journey to the hill), and then shoot a complete gag for 2 seasons?! Faiva constantly fell into a trance, it was simply infuriating. Kihar generally became a tame dog, constantly running around with rabbits. The fight went like this: they talked and talked and touched each other a little. Well, is this a fight??? Bigwig, when he got caught in the snare, screamed and screamed and that was it. Director!!! Have you read the book?! ,, Under the mask of blood, vomit and earth, Bigwig looked like a rabbit demon.,, Well??? In short, complete bullshit. I watched it completely. I will never watch it again.
Ol' Peter Jackson must have gotten ideas for his scenes from Rankin/Bass, as a kid. 👋👍👍🤠
The new ones are well made but i still find the Lynch one more entertaining.
1976 > 2006.
Lucy from Elfen Lied reminds me a lot of Carrie but I think the former is way more vicious since she can tear people apart into pieces.
The animated 1989 movie was way better by a landslide.
I found the 1990 remake was faithful to the Original but added better ideas and also the fate of Barbara making her tough at the end but she ends up disturbed by the end shot I hated the Original actress who played her and she was just as terrible in that souls movie plus ben's fate was better done as a zombie. The Original is a fave don't get me wrong but Savini made it his own while showing not only respect to Romero but his own ideas as well
First movie just captured the soft and painful melancholy from the book... The second one is all cheap and gibberish...
M life was a lie just find about 1970 ver
She’s the strongest in the 2002 version
This should have never been remade!!!
Remakes are always horrible they never capture the whole feeling remix are just an embarrassment never do a remake
KZread brujas brujas
The new Aaron is not really attractive to me 😭
They should remake this movie and have Steven Ogg as Jack Torrence
By reading all these comments I got to the conclusion that the remake is , for Haneke's meaning and social commentary, the superior movie. The 97' was just a prototype, that's why it feels way too realistic and authentic, while the 2007 is what the Director wanted it to be in the first place. I understand why everyone clings to the original though , this isn't the kind of franchise that loves it's audience
After seeing all of them I liked Dune 2000 the best
I'm just gonna say it...I seriously didn't like the kid in the 1997 version. And in truth, the 1997 version, SUCKED!!! The 1980 version of the shining though, is an absolute masterpiece!!! One of my top favorite movies! And it still is today!!!
Crazy how the 84 Dune looks better 39 years later 🤷🏻♂️
Courtesy of EMI Distributors and 20th Century Studios/Disney
That 2000 Dune looks ropey as hell
I prefer the '93 over the '88. I preferred the American actors over the Dutch ones and the ending not as disturbing. Got that with Se7en, The Wicker Man, The Mist, The Prestige, Primal Fear, Oldboy, The Skeleton Key, Buried, and The Omen.
Juan Jose 🪖 nunca me va a volver a este país y los amigos se quedan solos pobrecito yo los extraño mucho muchísimo te extraño los amo
1997 was a ripoff of the prior movies; no creativity; a cheesy "love story"; just modern special effects. Awful.
In the 2020 the grandma was a witch herself she just wasn’t evil
Wait is it in the same universe?
Can you do 101 Dalmatians cartoon/live action comparison?
I love how this is almost shot-for-shot for the most part of the first-half
Like Anthony Perkins said, "A boy's best friend is his mother."
Wili
Lmao the us ending is ridiculous
I mean…. kzread.info/dash/bejne/e3161NaOer3LnM4.htmlfeature=shared
Copy just copy never better than Forrest Gump!
I haven't seen this movie in a while
I prefer the 1978 version
Por que le cambiaron de nombre de la remake de sadako a Samara que quitan todo el crédito ala sadako por ella existe
The grinch is So cool
Nahh there’s no way I’m going to sleep in the hotel of the first one (Not because of Jack with an axe) I’m going to live inside my house besides that
Rewatching this movie as an actual witch makes me laugh at how they depict us. Don't worry we won't turn you into a mouse, we aren't bald, and we certainly are not ugly.
The 2005 version was a Hallmark Channel remake. Any wonder it was such crap? 😂
You’re crap have you ever wonder to appreciate things it doesn’t matter what quality is it, it’s about the hard work put in to it. How would you fell when people laugh at something hard you worked on? Nevertheless, you should take that word back because everything has a way of coming back to you. Plus. If you search about the Poseidon 2006. Google itself called it a “horrible remake”
Forrest : We don't got to worry about money anymore. Laal : We don't got to worry about money anymore.....as soon as I get this call scamming centre setup, we'll just take other peoples money.
i liked ian mcneice as baron harkonen in 2000 series
I feel like releasing it on June 6th, 2006 was a perfect marketing trick. But there’s no point in trying if all you’re doing is making a shot for shot plagiarized remake just with a more sophisticated budget. It’s basically like someone writing a book and then you steal all the credit and change minor details.
Do a similar video like this but remove the 1951 Verison. It is kinda inaccurate
The newer version by Gus Van Sant was a catastrophe. How could he think something like that could work?
Simplemente la película de 1976 NO TIENE COMPARACIÓN, ES UNA OBRA MAESTRA
Question 🚢⛴🛳⛵️🛶⚓️🌊🚤😂😁🛳 1:56 morning we have a great 👍 we love it we stopped Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa@aaaaaa@@@y Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa was your y,,! What, a good morning 😃🤯😭🤡😢😢🤒🥴😵 5:40