When you compare 1940 movie to other versions,you can see why hitchcock was such a great director

@mickirving6779

3 жыл бұрын

Yes!! Absolutely spot on!

1940 Rebecca is a Masterpiece

@joanneloesner1264

3 жыл бұрын

Yes!! And it is impossible to truly reproduce a masterpiece.

@vhen10k

3 жыл бұрын

Why you guys bandwagoning an old movie?

@missyandsyd123

3 жыл бұрын

Except for the cause of rebeccas death, which was changed in the Hitchcock version, I love the bbc adaptation from 1979, it’s pretty much perfect

@samanthab1923

3 жыл бұрын

Remember it was on our HS reading list. Saw it a couple years later & couldn't believe how exact the Mrs. Danvers character was.

@VONOBER

3 жыл бұрын

@@missyandsyd123 I totally agree with you! In my opinion, Olivier and Fontaine are perfect as Mr and Mrs de Winter. The film is a real masterpiece! Such a pity Hitchcock had to comply with the Motion Pictures Production Code of the time. The 1979 BBC miniseries is, on the contrary, so true to the book!

Fun fact: in spain open wool sweaters like the ones the protagonist wears in the film are called rebecca because of the movie and how popular they became after people saw the 1940’s version

@gideonharris1493

Жыл бұрын

Then they should have been called The Joan or the 2nd Mrs De Winter as you never see any picture of Rebecca's clothing except for her nightie and her fur coat.

@rosemarie9641

15 күн бұрын

Yes you are very right, we Spaniards call that piece of clothing "rebeca" (with just one c) due to this marvelous film. By the way, any comparison of other versions with the 1940 one is absurd: Hitchcock and his actors were great !!❤❤

The leading actor in the 1940's movie was much more handsome and breathtaking 💘

@jd9351

3 жыл бұрын

You mean Lawrence Olivier, the best actor ever?

@joanneloesner1264

3 жыл бұрын

He also had an air of mystery about him with an intangible sense of inner conflict and torment. A result I'm sure of Hitchcocks brilliant direction and Lawrence's ability to portray that nuance. Classic movie in every respect and will never be topped.

@GiudiCielHeaven

3 жыл бұрын

The actor in the 1997 movie is way too old for the role, too. They look like grandpa and granddaughter

@kerprice

3 жыл бұрын

@@joanneloesner1264 He was angry that Hitch didn't cast Vivien Leigh his paramour in the movie--Vivien wasn't right for it especially after kicking butt in GWTW. Hitch would tease Joan on the set to get the best performance. When Joan told Olivier she was recently married to an actor, Brian Aherne, Olivier said, "Couldn't you have done better than that?"

@MichaelDJ68

3 жыл бұрын

@@kerprice Robert Osborn of TCM said he always imagined Vivien Leigh should be Rebecca if the character was seen.

Why do they have to have so many remakes? The original is always better.

@mariaespiritu9606

3 жыл бұрын

Mostly money. Sometimes, it may or may not be the thought of how they wish to do it "better" for the younger audiences.

@mickirving6779

3 жыл бұрын

Always!

@janedoll3237

3 жыл бұрын

You’re right in this case but that’s just not true. The 80’s “The Thing” remake is better. The Maltese Falcon that everyone likes is a remake too. Shakespeare’s Hamlet isn’t original either, it was just better than other versions of the story.

@aniseadhikari1667

2 жыл бұрын

The Thing and Nosferatu remakes were great!

Never knew they made a 1997 version

@ThreadBomb

3 жыл бұрын

It was a TV miniseries.

@the_slime_cat

3 жыл бұрын

Thread Bomb ok

@VONOBER

3 жыл бұрын

Forget it! I recommend the 1979 miniseries with Emilia Fox's mother, Joanna David, as Mrs de Winter. It is so far the version that's closest to the book.

@alpha-omega2362

3 жыл бұрын

@@VONOBER Isn't there also a version with Jeremy Brent as Maxim? or is this the one that you are talking about?

@VONOBER

3 жыл бұрын

@@alpha-omega2362 I mean exactly that one, with Anna Massey, Brett's ex-wife, as Mrs Danvers.

If nothing else, it shows that movie actors were portrayed more glamorously in Old Hollywood.

@mtlicq

3 жыл бұрын

society was less casual and more genuine back then

@genevievemorgan7821

3 жыл бұрын

No the cinematography was better. Joan Fontaine was beautiful but managed to convey the timidity youth and uncertainty. In comparison Emilia Fox looks like a cardboard cutout.

The comparison is very interesting. Obviosly the 1940 is a hundred time much better.

@carmencollor1224

3 жыл бұрын

nevertheless, Charles Dance makes a quite convincing Maxim.

@fordlandau

3 жыл бұрын

Not a 100 times. 100,000 times. And now the Netflix version which is chocolate box fluff.

@carmencollor1224

3 жыл бұрын

@@fordlandau excellent comment.

@mindakahn9964

3 жыл бұрын

You didn’t read the book. It’s too Hollywood slick.

@janelle144

3 жыл бұрын

@@fordlandau Plus it lost the story line. I had to explain what was going on to my husband. Just a mishmash of a story that was disjointed.

The Hitchcock Rebecca is still the best. I’ve seen all versions including the most recent one.

@IamTulip

3 жыл бұрын

I would call the most recent version "inspired" by Rebecca but not a remake. It just has so many unwanted scenes.

@janelle144

3 жыл бұрын

@@IamTulip Agree, the story line was a jumble and if you didn't know the story you were completely lost.

@adrianaarzac7987

3 жыл бұрын

The most recent one is soooo bad, it is pitiful

@ameem8791

3 жыл бұрын

Tulip you are absolutely right!

@janelle144

3 жыл бұрын

@@IamTulip I absolutely hated when Danvers jumped into the sea instead of staying in Rebecca's room to die. That didn't make sense when she loved Rebecca so much. Other scenes were just a mishmash as well.

Olivier,Fontaine and Hitchcock directing ; no other version could possibly compare.

@acdragonrider

3 жыл бұрын

The new one also can’t

@jamesalexander5623

3 жыл бұрын

Don't Try to Remake a Hitchcock Film! EVER!

@acdragonrider

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesalexander5623 well they were adapting a book but yes Hitchcock’s film is the best

@CristinaPerez-ib2uu

3 жыл бұрын

I prefer the 1997 one. Sure, the original has the best atmosphere and the second is an imitation but, without intentionally trying to commit blasphemy, I find acting in the early 40s a bit over the top in terms of dramatics. And I find Dance a much better actor than Olivier.

@LATINHANDS65

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesalexander5623 I heard they wanna do The Birds and change it!

Joan Fontaine playing the lead in her first really major film was probably a nervous wreck playing against so many other talented players. It was that quality which makes her performance completely sincere and appropriate . . . and perfect!

No comparison. Olivier is the epitome of handsome suave, Fontaine is perfect as the naive love interest, the B&W photography is ethereal and atmospheric, Hitch's direction is subtle...there is only one Rebecca.

The handsome unforgettable Charles Dance💕

There is NO comparison. Some movies should never, ever be remade.

@Mangolite

3 жыл бұрын

Tell that to Netflix, Rebecca 2020.

Joan Fontaine, in this pictures tells the story with emotions, the other girl is just there.

@jorgearrieta6641

3 жыл бұрын

Yes Yes Yes exactly !

@rgs6236

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂

I prefer the 1940 version. Great compilation but it's missing my favourite scene where Mrs Danvers busts her checking out Rebecca's bedroom and proceeds to give her the guided tour. Supersoft fur coat, undies made by the nuns, see-through nightie etc.

@mtlicq

3 жыл бұрын

I want to see that scene! : ) Lois Heyde, you should be the director!

@mtlicq

3 жыл бұрын

I found that scene ! kzread.info/dash/bejne/iGqh1pJ8mKi2fLw.html

Everytime they try to remake an old classic it fails. I believe this was a Hitchcock movie. He was a genius. Let's just enjoy the imcredible movie making he and others from that time gave us and create new works of art that are an expression of the mind and art of the film maker today.

@CanelaAguila

3 жыл бұрын

Hitchcock didn't come up with all this, the concepts and story were Du Maurier's

@pansepot1490

3 жыл бұрын

@@CanelaAguila yup. Faithful screen version of the Du Maurier’s novel (a part from some details censorship didn’t like). Selznik was the producer, the same of Gone With The Wind, and he was famous for the tight creative control he had on his movies so he should be credited as much as the director. No sense in saying people shouldn’t remake “classics”. Shakespeare’s plays get new stage adaptations all the time and some are truly brilliant. No reason filmmakers shouldn’t try and do remakes. Only unforgivable sin is to make poor quality movies. 😁

@joanneloesner1264

3 жыл бұрын

@@pansepot1490 very well said. Since my first exposure to most of these remakes was the original, if it was brilliantly done as was Rebecca, to me the remake seems flat and "off" by comparison. All art of course is subjective and everyone is entitled to their opinion. Although you and I differ in our opinion I respect yours especially because you added the point about Selznik and you so eloquently expressed the rest. 👍

@joanneloesner1264

3 жыл бұрын

@@CanelaAguila yes Clara Hitchcock did not write the story he brought it to the screen. He was a master of creating an almost subtle suspense that could literally bring you to the edge of your seat and make your heart pound. Between meticulous casting and scene setups which seem to capture the vision of the story author he did create incredible masterpieces. He was not always successful but with Rebecca he did an incredible job. As mentioned in another response Selznik ( who is also no longer with us) also deserves some credit. We have some incredibly talented directors today like Speilberg in his presentation of Schindlers List who do very well taking on new projects and creating new masterpieces.

@fordlandau

3 жыл бұрын

Hitchcock’s only Best picture Academy Award. And an excellent treat of the novel. And a magnificent score !

The original version is by far more sophisticated. Much, much better framing, direction, acting, lighting, etc. Wow, a metaphor for the decline in modern cinema by comparison to the "golden period".

Now you have to do this for the latest version!

@evgeniagkioulou934

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed yes!!!

@kerprice

3 жыл бұрын

I couldn't get through the latest version. It started out okay, but quickly disinengrated. Kristen Scott Thomas looks peeved but is no Mrs. Danvers

@anne501s66

3 жыл бұрын

he's just done one. Check his channel. It's very good

Prefer 1940 version because age difference between Max & wife is approx 10-15 years. Brilliant acting. In l997 version Max is too old - old enough to be her grandfather. Emilia Fox dresses & acts like a teenager not a woman.

@snehajaym

3 жыл бұрын

Yes the 1997 version is very creepy. There is no chemistry at all. I have watched their series called fallen angel where they play father and daughter. So imagine watching them as husband and wife here... 😕

@poetcomic1

3 жыл бұрын

He looks like an aging Columbo villain.

@amysbees6686

3 жыл бұрын

I still think Joan Contains tried too hard to "act" like an ingenue. At least Emilia Fox WAS quite young!

@sweetpea2839

2 жыл бұрын

@@amysbees6686 Joan Fountain was born 1917, in 1940 She would have been around 23 yrs young. Max is suppose to be 40. Lawrence Olivier looks 40 and She looks early 20s and very innocent and unsure of herself. Emilia Fox was born 1974 so she would have been age 22,23 years young.

There's also a 1979 mini-series version with Jeremy Brett that is much better than the 1997 version and truer to the book than the 1940 version. Jeremy is the perfect Maxim.

@hirokohinomura1887

3 жыл бұрын

Saw this version also n I couldn't agree more.

@aci1970

3 жыл бұрын

With Joanna David? Funnily enough she's Emilia Fox mom

@annamillan2903

3 жыл бұрын

Jeremy Brett does not need an Oscar to be one of the best actors ever.

@misslucasc5121

3 жыл бұрын

The best and definitive Sherlock Holmes yet. He exudes mysterious charm.

@misslucasc5121

3 жыл бұрын

Thank YOU for this recommendation, I am definitely going to check it out. :)

Hitchcock ‘s version of Rebeca will be always the best one. A masterpiece ♥️👏👏👏👏👏♥️

"last night I dreamt I went to Mandalay" I have seen the 1940's version so many times. It's the closest interpretation of the book. The actors were wonderful and clearly studied the characters. Daphne du marier would have been pleased.

@valkyriesardo278

3 жыл бұрын

Manderly.....not Mandalay.

Rebecca (1940), by Hithcock is a masterpiece and Joan Fontaine is lovely and perfect as Mrs De Winter. I saw this 1997 version, and i think it's decent.

@pitbull635

3 жыл бұрын

1940 version leaves out some important details while the 1997 version covers a lot more.

@ginnylorenz5265

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. The 1940 version is magical, haunting, evocative, beautiful, mysterious. I could go on and on about the cast, music, sets.......... The 1997 version is, like you say, decent and entertaining, but for me, in comparison....flat. No more Hitchcocks and Selznicks today. They knew how to create a mood....how to create masterpieces. Just my opinion!

The original Rebecca was breathtaking ,the cast,the writing,acting,direction ,set design ;a masterpiece . The remake was so weak in comparison,I actually cringed at times ..

Rebecca has always been to me - Hitchcock, Sir Lawrence Olivier and Joan Fontaine. Every scene is classic in that movie.

This is brilliant the way you edited these to compare the scenes ⭐️

Love this movie!!!!! Especially the 1940 version😀

This is incredible! what a brilliant comparison of the two versions. Thank you so much for posting this. I was still a child when I saw the 1940 version. Joan Fontaine was one of my best-loved actresses. But the l997 version, with Charles Dance, Emilia Fox, and Diana Rigg, is far and away my favorite.

@michellegruber4187

3 жыл бұрын

I agree with you.

@naobe5

3 жыл бұрын

Totally! I love Hitchcock version and vision but it's still very 40's Hollywood vision of life in an English grand house pre WWII.

@Alexander-tj2dn

3 жыл бұрын

Your taste and knowledge of cinema is clearly very bad.

@francesjackson2511

3 жыл бұрын

Taste is a very personal thing. I respect yours.

@christinepaige2575

3 жыл бұрын

Frankly I think Olivier was a very uninspiring Maxim; he came across as soft and insipid...quite the opposite of Charles Dance.

I like how the dog was featured - and I think it was great how they were able to use the same butler in both films! After watching your Dune video and now this, I am definitely subbing.

@PamelaFlitton

3 жыл бұрын

Thread Bomb Same butler?

Watching this was so much fun. Thankyou

Excellent edition!!! Great movies and actors!

Thank you! Will watch both movies

5:11 1940 superb masterpiece of cinematography, costume/dress, actress and her behaviour She is clearly THE focus of attention with magnificent dress & hat, and her face and her smile and direction of her attention towards us, I can't put it in words succinctly. Absolutely magnificent sight, and focus on her worthy dress and her amazing joy, and her attention towards us, interaction with us, no competition for our eyes, and no wondering about anything at all, just pure natural effortless genuine magnificence. 1997 gulp. ahem. camera seems not level, actress kind of looks for the handrail, doesn't care to look towards us, not overjoyed and proud of her dress (which is drab) or happy to show it off for us, hat is just a tupid hat, doesn't frame her face, and most strikingly, everything around her draws attention away from her, we're too busy eyeing the fancy ornate gold picture frames, the ornate spindles and the rollercoaster handrail, and why is that plain white barn door behind her looking like a white domino that is about to fall on her, and that picture frame on the right looks like it is falling already from the top, and we wonder what is her left hand holding, if anything. Is it Adams Family Letisha? Cinematography disaster. She's not the focus and it seems if we try, why bother? 6:14 Similar for this point in the movie. Look at the difference. 1940 we see live humans interacting and affected by what the other says or is about to say, and we see the people, and no lame wonders like 1997, In 1997, why the hekk are we faced with the back/headboard of a chair, and the back of someone's head one of the main actors in that scene, ... 6:26 Just look at the difference! 1940 absolutely radiantly alive facial/body-language, radiant emotion, 1991, comatose , and again our eyes are easily distracted by more skin to look at below the clavicle, and by the variety of geometric angles and shapes around her. She's pretty, yes, but unlively, unemotional, disinterested, and our eyes are distracted by the geometry instead of focusing on her and what her thoughts & feelings are at the moment (looks like she doesn't have any at that point).

Very good job ! Thank You 👌🏽👏🏽

Great compilation of the two older versions.....now for the 2020 version.....Let's Wait!

@jearnott

3 жыл бұрын

Don’t bother!

What happened to cinematography like that which was used in the 1940 Rebecca? 1940 Rebecca looks like a film. 1997 Rebecca looks like a story board.

@jw70478

3 жыл бұрын

it was made for tv

Why remake it? It was such a classic

But there is no comparison... 1940s Hitch was soooo frighteningly haunting! Even more power in B&W 😎

Ok, I may sound a little nuts here, but after watching the 2020 Rebecca (twice) and just finished reading the book again for perhaps the 30th time (i'm 67) I just completed a spreadsheet of the 4 Rebecca's I've seen, the 1940, 1979, 1997 and 2020. Hitchcock wins the day!!! The only great part in the 2020 version is the incredible house and cottage/seaside. I wish those has been available for Hitchcock. I just couldn't put my finger on why the others missed the mark - until I found about 20 stills of Joan Fontaine's face from the original. Where the other leading ladies have 2 or 3 expressions, her expressions are remarkable! Such timidity, fear, cowardice, love and in the end bravery are all evident on her face. Although I have always loved Rebecca, now I know why. I know that even after they had begun filming Olivier was still trying to get her replaced with his wife Vivien Leigh...which added to Joan's insecurity as she worked on the film. Hitchcock also did visual tricks like placing the door knobs really high to make her appear smaller. When I first read the book in my 20's and being from the rural Midwest, I could not properly envision the dictates of running a house at that level of British aristocracy, but Downton Abbey and Upstairs Downstairs have given the American audience the proper view of the magnitude of forces working against her in the house, much less having to "follow" the seemingly "perfect, beautiful, brilliant" Rebecca. As I watch Hitchcock's Rebecca, I feel every dig, demeaning, cruel word that is either directed to her as well as implied. It's Joan's acting and DuMaurier's fantastic writing that captured that. There is a still of the 2020 movie when Mrs Danvers is showing the new Mrs DeWinter Manderly when she first arrives. Kristin Scott Thomas as Mrs Danvers stays in character (like she could pull heads off baby chicks) but Lily James is smiling (like oh there's a camera, time to smile). Unbelievable!!! I won't comment on the actress in this 1997 version, as her lack of acting speaks for itself. Thank you Matt Skuta for you hard work in creating this - great job!!

@PamelaFlitton

3 жыл бұрын

Michele Wise While I agree with everything you say about Fontaine, I have to say that most of the credit should go to Hitchcock, he coaxed amazing performances out of his actors, and it is his direction and camera shots etc that provide so much that is great in the film. For instance if we compare the scenes where Rebecca breaks the ornament, and then has to confess to it, in the Hitchcock version we totally feel Fontaine’s anxiety and mortification, the dynamics within that scene are incredible, but in the new version there is no tension in the scene, it serves merely as a reason for Max to be cross with her.

And now they're doing a brand new version. Nobody can top that first one with Laurence Olivier. I wish somebody could come up with a new idea rather than these redoes.

There is no comparison Rebecca 1940 a masterpiece that shouldn't have been remade....Why tamper with perfection..

@rgs6236

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly 👏🏽👏🏽

@mickirving6779

3 жыл бұрын

Love that!

@mikelheron20

2 жыл бұрын

For one thing modern taste tends to prefer colour to black and white. I don't see any problem with a remake. The original version still exists for anybody that wants to watch it. And although I know it's heresy to say so I always thought Laurence Olivier overacted terribly.

Классно, синхронно смонтирован ролик! Автор, вы супермастер! Посмотрю обязательно обе версии!!! 👍

I loved the Rebecca that was aired on PBS with Jeremy Brett and Joanna David

I watched the 1940 version first and it became one of my favorite movies! I love the 1940 version 🖤

I was a big fan of 1997 until I saw 1940 version.... such a fool I was. I even love the couple from 1940 more.... absolutely awesome chemistry I'd believe them anything.....quality! ♥

None of the adaptations of _Rebecca_ have been entirely satisfactory. I wonder if there's a certain amount of sexism when women's literature is adapted for the screen. All women's literature is treated as romantic. _Rebecca_ is in fact a gothic thriller bordering on supernatural horror (du Maurier was strongly influenced by the gothic literature of Poe and Radcliffe.) Hitchcock's version came the closest, but had to be toned down to appease the 1940s censors. _Rebecca_ should be filmed with all the menace and horror of _The Omen_ and _The Shining._ Instead, because she's a woman, du Maurier's work is treated as Mills & Boon.

@angelabby2379

3 жыл бұрын

1940s closest........i watched it and it's like comedy. Mrs danvers look like angry nanny mcphee....im not scared. Maxim look like spoiled child because his face is cute and he is really really short

@blameitoncapitalism

3 жыл бұрын

I feel the same

@pansepot1490

3 жыл бұрын

I have read the book and the op is so true! I don’t know if sexism is a prejudice against female authors or viewers. Producers want to sell and they think outright romance will attract wider audience.

@splinterbyrd

3 жыл бұрын

@@pansepot1490 Well horror classics like _Amityville_ have been bigger than any romance. I just don't get how producers can be so backward about women's literature.

@splinterbyrd

3 жыл бұрын

@@angelabby2379 Agreed. Mrs Danvers is supposed to be like Billie Whitelaw as Mrs Baylock in _The Omen._ None of the screen adaptations have even got close.

I never knew there was a ‘97 mini series? It looked well done.

@ryanhilliard1620

3 жыл бұрын

It is well done. However, it is paced very differently and goes into more detail about the characters. Mrs. Danvers is more human as well.

The 1940s version is absolutely the best. The actor looks handsome and has trusting eyes whereas the 1997 actor looks like a villainous and creepy old man.

Pero...cómo se atrevieron a intentarlo! !! . Fue una magistral película. No pueden comparar ni la dirección, no las actuaciones. Saludos desde Argentina

I don t like this new version, 2020. I love the 1940 version, but still watched the 1997.

1040 s version is my pick.It has all the most ronantic premis, lovely cinamatography, music, drama directing and what a cast, it just cannot be bettered.

Rebecca de 1940 una obra de Arte!

The 1940 version was the best. Have watched all versions

Hi 👋 😆

well done!

Without the comparison you almost don’t realize how good the 1940 version is

The old crazy man’s eyes terrified me as a child watching the movie.

1940 Rebecca is a great movie and great actors. Love it.

Excellent work! To compare is always interesting, I love each "Rebecca" in its own way, but "Rebecca 1940" is maybe "the real one", the B/W version is wonderful, although this one from 1997. is very well done, great casting, photography and music. Very curious about "Rebecca 2020". The soundtrack in general is amazing. Judith Anderson as Mrs. Danvers is unique and unforgettable, perfectly performed role.

This should be done for all the made versions 👍 Please do 🤗 💝

both very good, along with the 1979 (Brett/David/Massey) version and the new 2020 version. All good in their own way. good comparison job ! Thanks for posting

The book is better than both. The modern retelling was different but still worthy of watching.

Me quedo con la primera versiòn con Joan Fontaine y Laurence Olivier ; en blanco y negro se aprecia mejor y le da ese aire de suspenso que nos tiene acostumbrado Alfred Hitchcook en sus pelìculas.Buena interpretaciòn de ambos. I keep the first question with Joan Fontaine and Laurence Olivier; In black and white he appreciates better and gives him that air of suspense that Alfred Hitchcook has accustomed to us in his movies. Good interpretation of both.

I didn't know rebecca was remade

@TheKevinKruger

3 жыл бұрын

Me neither

@ThreadBomb

3 жыл бұрын

Some people won't watch black and white films.

@dd1530

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThreadBomb Unfortunately

@thebeautifulnarcissist6662

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThreadBomb I’m pretty sure more people watched the black and white version. I never knew there was a 1997 version until it was mentioned in the comments of the 2020 version.

and there’s gonna be a 2020 version

@HoangNguyen-ol6yt

3 жыл бұрын

and it will be sucked. I dont think the cast is right.

@VONOBER

3 жыл бұрын

I wonder why they had to release yet another version, when Hitchcock in 1940 and the BBC in 1979 set the bar so high!

@MTknitter22

3 жыл бұрын

which does not look all that great compared to 1940 one

@donarail00

3 жыл бұрын

I just watched from the beginning I thought it might be good by the ending it was awful. They changed a few things which didn't make sense why.

@HoangNguyen-ol6yt

3 жыл бұрын

@@donarail00 you were refering to the 2020 version? If yes then I agree. Finish it last night and it is the least favorite of mine. The changes they made seem just for the cause of differing it from other versions but they change completely the characters. Especially the main leading girl. She was too daring, too passionate (dating a strange man for 3 days and they already kissed and had sex). The ending makes me feel she had become a complete strange character. Maxim is pushing back in to the cells to make her the only hero trying to save her poor man from the death sentence. Non sense. It's not women enpowerment, it's all toxic feminism they try to put into every single film nowadays.

Muy buen trabajo de edición y comparación de ambas películas. Ví hace unos días la 3ra. versión (de Netflix) y resultan más que similares. Aunque la versión de 1940 no se supera. Pero igual son fantásticas todas.

A masterpiece and a TV entertainment.

Classic is always the best.

Excellent edition!!! I watched it again and I can't believe what marvelous it is!!! - I love Rebecca 1997

@soumimukhopadhyay1255

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. The best is 1997.

@silviagladys1270

3 жыл бұрын

@@soumimukhopadhyay1255 I have watched it a lot of times!

@soumimukhopadhyay1255

3 жыл бұрын

And yet everyone will choose Hitchcock because that is thing to do. To me Charles Dance was spectacular as Max d Winter. Anyone who read Rebecca will understand. I didn’t think Lawrence Olivier acted well at all.

@silviagladys1270

3 жыл бұрын

@@soumimukhopadhyay1255 Rebecca 1997 says the same words that are written in the book, I have read it in Spanish (my language, because I am from Argentina) and in English. Besides Charles Dance and Emilia Fox are sweet and the miniseries is romatic, human. Because Maxim was a good man, he helped the sailors, and showed it also saving Mrs Danvers. The Hichcock version was suitable for that time perhaps but not now.

@soumimukhopadhyay1255

3 жыл бұрын

@@silviagladys1270 yes, glad someone is with me on this 👍🏻

Rebeca una mujer inolvidable muy linda pelicula a mi me gusto mucho la vercion mas antigua del 40

rebecca was a delightful film!! Sir Laurence Olivier, his elegance! and the young of Joan Fontain, and please, don't forget this memorable woman (miss danver) the actress Judith Anderson!! For long distance when the original film is a masterpiece and directed by Alfred Hitchcock, is very dificult to make a version that is not as the same Daphne du Maurier even wants!!!

Hands down Fontaine Olivier Hitchcock - captured the mystique of Du Maurier's classic novel and era of that time-

The 1940 Rebecca is by far the very best one. It was difficult not to make comparisons with the 2020 one. It didn’t work for me. I was very disappointed with it.

Os dois filmes me parecem muito bem feitos os atores desempenharam bem o seu papel. Mas agora a netflix ainda está exibindo uma terceira versão do filme nossa pra que?. Lembrando que o melhor foi o primeiro com Laurence Olivier!

Matt Skuta, thank you thank you thank you! I like the 1997 better. But according to the novel, Maxim is a handsome guy. Rich, elegant,and not so old like the actor in 1997 version. I watched the miniseries first, then went back, search for the Hitchcock one. Thats why I prefer the 1997.

And both are streaming on KZread.

Yes, have to agree, the oldie is the goodie

I wonder what Rebecca told Maxim in the rocks post their honeymoon that made her want to kill her. The sequel, "Rebecca's Tale" holds a lot of credibility since the author studied the original novel extensively to come up with a plausible explanation regarding Rebecca's background and motivation for her life deeds. It was an excellent character analysis.

I love the 1940s original. A great classic. One thing I do like with the 1997 BBC remake is that it shows Rebecca herself in broken flashbacks and we get to hear her voice where she is just described in the original. I also like the actors especially Diana Rigg as Mrs Danverse. Judith Anderson’s portrayal is different more heighten in a way and unforgettable. The 2020 remake I have not seen yet. Kristen Scott Thomas plays Mrs Danverse ‘Danny’

Maravilhosa comparação. Gostaria de poder ver a versão de 1940.

why the studios insist so much in making remakes?? Why they think that they can "improve" a masterpiece?? 80 years passed and Hitchcock is still one of the best directors of the cinema´s history. Nobody can´t compite with that.

Did Charles Dance not age at all during the last 23 years?

Either version is great. I like comparing the Jeremy Brett/ Joanna David/ AnnaMassey version to the other. You can see them both here on you tube. Ironically Emilia Fox is the daughter of Joanna David. These versions are closer to the book. The new Netflix version was horrible.

J'adore ce film

Nothing is won. A masterpiece cannot be improved. 1000 times better the first one.

Love the old one and the newest with lily James.

What's the newest version like? I love the 1940 Hitchcock version as Joan Fountain and Laurence Olivier are prefect for the roles.

@katherineyost1653

3 жыл бұрын

It’s flat. Weak script and direction. Disappointing costumes. Even though I like Lily James, she doesnt carry the movie. I am inspired to listen to the audible book version and it is very good.

Excelente trabajo de edición, que solo sirve para afirmar que la versión de Rebecca de 1940 (Sir Alfred Hitchcock) sigue siendo insuperable y no resiste comparación alguna con ninguna de las versiones que se han hecho de esta Obra Maestra. Ninguna actriz está a la altura de Joan Fontaine, ni tampoco los protagonistas masculinos se encuentran al nivel de Laurence Olivier....es mi humilde opinión.

6:10 Palpatine's in the Rebecca remake!

I will always prefer the 1940s version since I read the source material. However, would you care to now add the Lilly Collins, Armie Hammer, and Kristin Scott Thomas 2020 versions side by side as well? Thanks

@acdragonrider

3 жыл бұрын

Lily James 😂

Excellent comparison. The Hitchcock version is of course the classic. You will have to add the new Rebecca version that is currently on Netflix.

Diana Rigg won an Emmy in 1997 for playing Mrs Danvers. RIP Diana queen of thorns on Game Of Thrones.

@samanthab1923

3 жыл бұрын

Charles Dance too! Head of the Lannister's.

I just love the original.

Matt skuta make side by side comparison of animal farm please?

now we will have to add the one I just watched on netflix (the oldest one is still the best)

I love 1940 and 2020 version 😍🌸

Monalisa (1503/2021) side-by-side comparison Leonardo da Vinci version vs scribble done by a 3-year-old

They seem the same , shot 4 shot ,,, I'm not an expert but i think it's an ingenious effort , thank u

Just watched the 2020 version. Was really good.

@gilliansimpson1241

3 жыл бұрын

I really enjoyed it too! It’s supposed to be more true to the book the way it ended .