Why Raeesah Khan might have lied: Pritam Singh and Edwin Tong's testy exchange

A testy exchange took place between Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh and Mr Edwin Tong, Minister for Culture, Community and Youth, at a hearing into a lie told by former WP Member of Parliament (MP) Raeesah Khan.
During the exchange last Friday, Mr Singh told Parliament’s privileges committee that Ms Raeesah had told him and a WP disciplinary panel late last month that she suffers from dissociation, where she talks without thinking.
Read more: tdy.sg/320e6uM
Inform your views at TODAY: www.todayonline.com/
FOLLOW US ON:
Instagram: / todayonline
Twitter: / todayonline
Facebook: / todayonline
Telegram: t.me/todayonlinesg

Пікірлер: 411

  • @cayotelives
    @cayotelives2 жыл бұрын

    Ask his opinion and then telling him don't give view . ET go Home

  • @f.s.c8488

    @f.s.c8488

    2 жыл бұрын

    Again, I’m sitting up here, you’re downstairs and sitting alone, I’ve backpacker here.

  • @raytan1661

    @raytan1661

    2 жыл бұрын

    Ya ya papaya lousy

  • @leechengho8407

    @leechengho8407

    2 жыл бұрын

    You're right, ET shld acted in a circus instead of going around in circles trying to pin down all other members of d Oppo's Party as though they're d real culprits n not d one n only RK, who shld be make answerable to all her lies.

  • @guoankueo6706
    @guoankueo67062 жыл бұрын

    Edwin tong just made himself look bad with his line of questioning 🤡

  • @melwu4839

    @melwu4839

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yes totally agree with u he does not even know how to tackle this hard case might as well get a better lawyer that understands this case

  • @MagizLord

    @MagizLord

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@melwu4839 not about whether he understands this case or not. It is about the style he is using and possibly any agenda he is harbouring. with all those leading questions trying to spark any gotcha moments.

  • @yvvonelee5026

    @yvvonelee5026

    2 жыл бұрын

    No, he doesn't look bad, he looks very arrogant

  • @leechengho8407

    @leechengho8407

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yes v true, his senseless questioning directed PS, make himself a laughing stock.

  • @leechengho8407

    @leechengho8407

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@yvvonelee5026 We may think tt you're right to mention ET is arrogant but come a few odd jokers said PS is d one.

  • @maxnah1
    @maxnah12 жыл бұрын

    Why is edwin tong asking for pritam opinion but disregard his suggestions? How come Edwin is taking side? He must be impartial.

  • @NookTommy

    @NookTommy

    2 жыл бұрын

    He also said “lets not speak over each other” but he keeps interrupting PS. And hates it when PS interrupts hin

  • @asdrion1769

    @asdrion1769

    Жыл бұрын

    The moment you a political in the cabinet, and the moment your salary is controlled by that said party. You are no longer impartial to any interest free decision making relating to the matter.

  • @katong1953
    @katong19532 жыл бұрын

    Raseeah didn't need a reason to lie. She lied about the police when there was no need to do so. So stop pressing Pritam Singh for a reason why a liar should lie. Raseeah could have lied to "improve" her narrative.

  • @steevetan3347

    @steevetan3347

    2 жыл бұрын

    Only Empty vessel will make this much noise just to press for answerless answer!

  • @bobafett5757

    @bobafett5757

    2 жыл бұрын

    Then why didnt he reported those lies he knew for 3 months and do you know he is a leader ?

  • @skychaos87

    @skychaos87

    2 жыл бұрын

    This is exactly why we need to find out the reason why she is lying, if we can prove that she is lying to improve her narrative, shift the blame or to drag others down, then it will clear Pritam's name. This is why we even have investigation process in the first place, to cross examine, to fact find. This is a good chance for Pritam to share his side of the story.

  • @shielatee302

    @shielatee302

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@bobafett5757 Trying to avoid He Said She said debacle. We will have all the Woke Warriors out there going after WP Leadership. Remember that Ms Khan might be suffering from some mental health issue not just of her past alleged sexual assault compound with a huge lie in Parliament. We are dealing with A Liar who continued to lie again in October 3 when it is clearly stated to her that she needs to come clean. She is just scared shit of the aftermath of her own doing. It is a simple Fight or Flight respond. In the beginning the issue was in the hands of Mr Pritam Singh n Mr Manap. Silvia Lim came into the scene on October 8/12 after Ms Khan lied again on Oct 3. Misery loves Company. Having Ms Loh n Mr Nathan on her side is her shield 🛡 that brought harm to a political party which is gaining trust with People n Serving Our Interest not Foreigners which is the Policy of the Ruling Party. This is bigger than just Ms Khan lie. This will make or break the future of a bunch of Losers in the Ruling Party.

  • @shielatee302

    @shielatee302

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@skychaos87 They need a transcript to use against the WP leadership. They got it after all the leading n misleading questioning of Edwin Snake. Using the words of their own against WP is how they not get their hands dirty. Yet the COP did not put into consideration how that Evidence aka Transcript was obtained. They use 2 inexperience women in politics to do their bidding. Nice play 👏👏👏 COP. Their manipulative n unscrupulous ways will come back n bite them in the ass. They are looking for words not facts to do their job. Facts is far important in a hearing than just Play on Words. That is the Politicians in them. Having been beaten by Covid every steps of the way Never Taught Them anything. Control is an Illusion.

  • @woffydo
    @woffydo2 жыл бұрын

    Edwin simply twisting and repeating, Pritam is good

  • @destonwong2577
    @destonwong25772 жыл бұрын

    As a member of the Committee one should be impartial throughout the investigation, stay objective and make substantiated inference. Trying to corner Mr Pritam SIngh without objective evidence makes the COP looks real bad. it is undeniable Ms Khan made a series of mistakes lying again and again. It already look bad on the leadership of WP, however trying to sling mud at the CEC of WP is pretty low. And moreover Mr Edwin Tong tonality and choice of words suggests biasness against Mr Pritam.

  • @shielatee302

    @shielatee302

    2 жыл бұрын

    Well said 👍👍👍 Thank u ☺️

  • @jasonong5562

    @jasonong5562

    2 жыл бұрын

    The committee and its members have a role to play and that is to investigate. Investigators have to dig and poke to find out the truth as most people will not volunteer to tell the truth at first run. You can see in a few instances only after much pushing then some additional truth comes out. If the COP play nice, some Singaporeans too will say they failed in their jobs. This is an investigation not nice nice chit chat. Cannot please everyone. Everyone has his or her own perception and opinion.

  • @darren1966

    @darren1966

    2 жыл бұрын

    @Yusuf Best this just proves people are getting mixed up with being impartial and having bias agenda, lol

  • @magnusthor6259
    @magnusthor62592 жыл бұрын

    I am a PAP supporter but I am very sad that they chose to try to bring down the Worker Party through Raeesah' s lie. Every educated individual would know that Edwin Tong's line of questioning is overbearing and attempting to force Pritam to admit to wrongdoings through silly assumptions. It went on for so long and it is very painful to watch. PAP should stop doing such things as I am sure it is putting off a lot of educated voters. You just need to establish the facts and come out with a report on how the Worker Party Central Committee could have handle it better. That's all. Now this circus show is circulating on social media and it reflects very badly on PAP trying to pin blame on Pritam while there is no significant evidence. My sympathy lies with Pritam Singh.

  • @coldhart79

    @coldhart79

    2 жыл бұрын

    Totally agree, all what u menroned is what my thoughts.. If this happens in the opposite party, this scenario won't be even be shown to the public! Now one person mistake, trying all means to tear down WP and using tactics to make PS to say wrong words. It's like forced integration!

  • @ShamuAdism

    @ShamuAdism

    2 жыл бұрын

    Agree!!! lost respect liaow with tht Tong Guy soooo very sensitive

  • @neodarren9915

    @neodarren9915

    2 жыл бұрын

    You really think PAP wanted to bring down WP? Do you know why Sengkang east always vote against PAP? The food stall rental is at least $8000 versus $600 to $1200 in AMK and Bedok etc.. There is coffee shop here but less than 5 table outdoor while the rest are benches. It is totally different in Sengkang west under PM LHL. Sengkang east GRC is meant to be given to opposition forever so that the high food prices and lack of proper amenities will depress the resale price to warn the rest not to follow Sengkang footstep. The snub from democracy summit is a startling reminder that Even with almost 10 opposition members Singapore is still not recognised as democracy by western standard. It is a delicate balancing act for PAP to increase the opposition seat while maintaining majority to improve Singapore international image as well as his own to leave a legacy in history.

  • @gala1684

    @gala1684

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@neodarren9915 If our country's politics is purely down to kopitiam rental prices then our country has no hope anymore...there is no such thing as leave the GRC for the opposition. Things change and people's mindset and educational level also change we are in the internet age and things can't be swept under the carpet. the young generation see things differently as to how the Pioneer generation see it.

  • @neodarren9915

    @neodarren9915

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@gala1684 yes you are right talking about lofty idealism but come and experience the long queue and rude staff while paying food court price but low quality food everyday while having not enough tables and seat even in non peak hour and it will drive you crazy and will drive to amk Ave 10 instead for decent meal but pay more fuel cost and time wasted and even the ardent supporter of PAP would revolt. During GCT era is hdb upgrading that benefited the mature estate and now PAP depended on daily food prices to win high vote for high profile ministers in mature estate while the residents of sengkang are made to subsidize the rest of the country.

  • @myblacklife6
    @myblacklife62 жыл бұрын

    SUPPORT WP! They are here to give an alternative voice in parliament . People pls don’t ever forget this !

  • @danielong5334

    @danielong5334

    2 жыл бұрын

    NO!

  • @mikaelnadal6661

    @mikaelnadal6661

    2 жыл бұрын

    Not when the voice is coming from people like RK. If we have more people like pritam in WP, they would definitely be more popular

  • @hanzo9941

    @hanzo9941

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yes you are right.

  • @danielong5334

    @danielong5334

    2 жыл бұрын

    Alternate lies from time to time you mean...

  • @DarkMeyer777
    @DarkMeyer7772 жыл бұрын

    I thought the whole Saga is supposed to make WP looks bad. For a while I lost confidence in WP but Pritam Singh turned it all around. I'm now 100% sure Pritam Singh is the ideal person to lead Singapore in the next 30 years.

  • @Scambuster491

    @Scambuster491

    2 жыл бұрын

    Best joke heard !

  • @Scambuster491

    @Scambuster491

    2 жыл бұрын

    As a resident in Aljunied GRC, I will definitely not vote for him after this saga. 2 sagas back to back.

  • @user-wz4or4vv2c

    @user-wz4or4vv2c

    2 жыл бұрын

    Singapore will not survive if Pritam Singh is to lead Singapore

  • @BearBear0310

    @BearBear0310

    2 жыл бұрын

    Pritam Singh if lead Singapore.we are die asap

  • @rkq7112

    @rkq7112

    2 жыл бұрын

    Then Singapore will not even survive more than 10 years let alone 30. No one needs to make WP look bad. They’re already as bad as they came and getting worse. Really unbecoming of a leader of the opposition to behave like that in parliament. He didn’t turn anything around except for the gun at himself.

  • @molecularful
    @molecularful2 жыл бұрын

    Pritam is solid!

  • @fiost1489

    @fiost1489

    2 жыл бұрын

    He was wavering.Stammering and couldn't recall things. A sign of guilt.

  • @melwu4839

    @melwu4839

    2 жыл бұрын

    He is a male lion on a hunting mode to settle this case once and for all

  • @tsarivantheterrible1256

    @tsarivantheterrible1256

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fiost1489Did we watch the same video? He was great. You're making shit up to promote your own bias.

  • @fiost1489

    @fiost1489

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@tsarivantheterrible1256 I dont need to make this up. He was not forthright in his answers. Do you know that a reply as " not relevant " is not acceptable to the Courts or " It didn't cross my mind". If every accused is entitled to reply like him, we won't have justice here

  • @coldhart79

    @coldhart79

    2 жыл бұрын

    After this saga, I have high respect for PS but for ET, speechless....

  • @kahhengyeong7947
    @kahhengyeong79472 жыл бұрын

    Regards to that RK confessed that she has a psychological condition during the DP, it is either she lied or it is really the truth. If she had lied, means she did another grave mistake again. If her condition is true, why is this conveniently ignored? This fact could be so crucial to the proceeding! Hello, die hard PAP supporters ! This is what you voted for!

  • @reddumplin3588
    @reddumplin35882 жыл бұрын

    Edwin tong is a joke

  • @0.1.feb.
    @0.1.feb.2 жыл бұрын

    This would really backfire on the PAP. Pritam Singh looks very steady and calm in the face of Mr Tong's line of questioning. Pritam Singh looks like a potential prime minister by his performance here. 👏

  • @darren1966

    @darren1966

    2 жыл бұрын

    yeah but I assume LKY would take it to the grave not to let WP rule SG

  • @Vaiyen
    @Vaiyen2 жыл бұрын

    ET ask PS why he thinks Khan lied. PS replied that Khan admitted to having a psychological condition and suggests an assessment. Then ET says it is 'quite inappropriate' for PS to say this. WTF sia. Want to ask question but dont want to hear answer.

  • @limrobert7837

    @limrobert7837

    2 жыл бұрын

    ET you just want PS to answer the way you want it

  • @ethanang3527

    @ethanang3527

    Жыл бұрын

    Want to 🗳

  • @victorgo2364
    @victorgo23642 жыл бұрын

    Why find problem with all the people beside the only person that lie? She lied period!

  • @heavenstorm6055
    @heavenstorm60552 жыл бұрын

    And to think Edwin Tong is supposingly the next minister of law. With this standard, the future looks bleak for Singapore's justice system.

  • @ashunknown9728

    @ashunknown9728

    2 жыл бұрын

    Haha haha

  • @Iskander-MsM

    @Iskander-MsM

    2 жыл бұрын

    The illusion he has portrayed is a perfect recipe of a doomsday

  • @kohk.l1930

    @kohk.l1930

    2 жыл бұрын

    He want to act like a judge where he can't be one

  • @leechengho8407

    @leechengho8407

    2 жыл бұрын

    Hope our SJS won't turn into a Kangaroo Court just like our neighbours around us.

  • @suzukigsx1807

    @suzukigsx1807

    Жыл бұрын

    Dont forget, this edwin scum was the lawyer for city harvest kong hee, what do you think?

  • @marklin637
    @marklin6372 жыл бұрын

    Kudos to Pritam. You have what it takes to make a good leader. Time to scout for good talents to join the workers party. This time around you will nail it. We are all behind you most definitely. No two ways about it. I am pretty sure a sizeable majority Singaporeans would like to see you be our next PM. You can do it.

  • @faisalfowler2679
    @faisalfowler26792 жыл бұрын

    The funny thing about this.. PAP reprimand Raesah because she lies.. But now standing with her because of her lies.. And now Edwin Tong sounds like a secondary school HOD teacher investigating and reprimand others straight of a liar's proclaimed indulgence.. So weird Edwin Tong.. Why is Pritam the subject when you know you got info from a person who lies in the first place.. So weirddddddddd

  • @fiost1489

    @fiost1489

    2 жыл бұрын

    Because they realised that she didn't act alone. There were conspirators

  • @waldenboulevard8047

    @waldenboulevard8047

    2 жыл бұрын

    That's right. ET theory is that RK was telling the truth in the text. How could it be? She lied to parliament for no reason. She would have lief again and again to cover for herself

  • @anchored555

    @anchored555

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@waldenboulevard8047 Fact that is undisputed is that the WP leadership knew about RK’s lie for 3 months but sat on it. Hard to explain that way. If they cannot, they will be complicit in her lying to parliament. So it’s every man for himself now. If they can make her out to be a nut case or habitual liar, they might be able to discredit what she said about them telling her to stick to her lie. But even so, how do they explain keeping quiet about her lie for 3 months? Hard to wiggle out of that one.

  • @sgboon

    @sgboon

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fiost1489 where is your evidence that PS told her to lie?

  • @ashunknown9728

    @ashunknown9728

    2 жыл бұрын

    Secondary Hod teacher hahahahah

  • @beezlebub9
    @beezlebub92 жыл бұрын

    5:55 very rude, Mr Tong. How do you know what Mr Singh is thinking? Are you a mind-reader?

  • @parnamsaini4751

    @parnamsaini4751

    2 жыл бұрын

    He is behaving like a mind reader...you mean?

  • @shielatee302
    @shielatee3022 жыл бұрын

    Pritam Singh calling out the Chairperson to wake up n pay attention is such a damning move to the Credibility of the COP. We are dealing with a Bunch of Salty Loser Uncles n Aunties on the panel. They are so out of their League. The Court did a clinical evaluation to an army lady arguing with a SDA. Yet easily brushed aside during this hearing. Talking n politicised Mental Health yet CLEARLY DISREGARD this here is just WHO THEY ARE. All Talk No Walk…No Action. Just Shameless.

  • @waldenboulevard8047
    @waldenboulevard80472 жыл бұрын

    ET is not conducting an inquiry here. His mind is already made up. He is just lobbing accusations at PS

  • @mayajhea3431

    @mayajhea3431

    2 жыл бұрын

    absolutely!

  • @steevetan3347

    @steevetan3347

    2 жыл бұрын

    Exactly !

  • @shun9142

    @shun9142

    2 жыл бұрын

    Ya so blatant

  • @limrobert7837

    @limrobert7837

    2 жыл бұрын

    Honestly ET being a PAP Minister should not conduct this enquiry, questioning WP MPs. It is a mockery.

  • @limlisa

    @limlisa

    Жыл бұрын

    No he did not

  • @TheMandinotan
    @TheMandinotan2 жыл бұрын

    If any, Pritam Singh shows that he can hold his ground. And when it comes to powerplay, Pritam wins, hands down. Edwin is too cute. Where's K. Shanmugam?

  • @daryld357

    @daryld357

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yea was wondering why they didnt bring out the big guns. Shanmugam vs Pritam would be legendary to watch

  • @parnamsaini4751

    @parnamsaini4751

    2 жыл бұрын

    Run redi.

  • @cccoke

    @cccoke

    2 жыл бұрын

    I think PS shud hire M Ravi to deal with Shanmugam.

  • @ralineshah3095

    @ralineshah3095

    2 жыл бұрын

    K Shanmugan busy eating toseh at Tekka Market....

  • @rabbitteeth8595

    @rabbitteeth8595

    2 жыл бұрын

    wdym by edwin is cute haha... i don't think so.

  • @dua4605
    @dua46052 жыл бұрын

    Can a liar words be trusted? If a liar has a case and if a liar continues to lie will the liar be sued for defamation? If the liar can prove others also lied can she be absolved from all lies, will the liar be let off scot free? If I lie and said others also lie is that a mitigation factors in terms of sentencing? In the first place why 'lie'?

  • @babyhermes2965

    @babyhermes2965

    2 жыл бұрын

    Facts: PS is a lawyer, Slyvia is lawyer plus ex police officer, law lecturer, Faisal has been MP for Aljunied GRC since 2011. None of them known to lie before this episode plus "common sense" will tell you these WP leaders will recognise the consequences for telling her to cover up a lie with more lies. It's not just a career gone, whole party reputation will be in shatters. Who do you believe?

  • @ethanang3527

    @ethanang3527

    2 жыл бұрын

    Be careful what you do, cause the lie become the truth, hey hey hey…

  • @dua4605

    @dua4605

    2 жыл бұрын

    Only if it can be proven, without proof it is just a baseless and groundless accusations

  • @leechengho8407

    @leechengho8407

    2 жыл бұрын

    Very good n appropriate question to ask 'Why lie' n is logical enough tt d one who lied shld be held responsible.

  • @vincelim1745
    @vincelim17452 жыл бұрын

    Tong, you don't study who is your opponent . you must knew and study Pritiam . Looks at him compare with u . Pritiam is well knowledge and prepared to face you and tackle all your question. Hear , you are taking the facts base on whatsapps and email. please . Tong. throw your towel.

  • @roshinimaricar5219

    @roshinimaricar5219

    2 жыл бұрын

    🤔🤐🤨😐🤭🤗🤫🤒

  • @fiost1489

    @fiost1489

    2 жыл бұрын

    By giving answer as " not relevant " all the time. Good try

  • @scottloh78ify
    @scottloh78ify2 жыл бұрын

    Tong is a fool.

  • @fiost1489

    @fiost1489

    2 жыл бұрын

    Pritam is the fool here. All his words are recorded

  • @anailian8217

    @anailian8217

    2 жыл бұрын

    WP 蛇鼠一窝

  • @sultansingh1316
    @sultansingh13162 жыл бұрын

    Nobody understands Edwin Tong at all. How could a reasonable person believe Raeesah's rendition to implicate Pritam via a message to others when it is uncontroverted that Raeesah is liar who had lied to the police?

  • @rayjoseph7798
    @rayjoseph77982 жыл бұрын

    ET is living in a different planet & time zone true to his name.

  • @gavingohpohsoon
    @gavingohpohsoon2 жыл бұрын

    Shame on you Edwin...

  • @ManoK54
    @ManoK542 жыл бұрын

    Mr Tong seems to be condescending with regards to psychiatry referral.MR singh mention her diassociation issue,as it implies instability and a mindset which appears not clear suggested. Psychiatry assesment would be considered as she is in a responsible post

  • @saleemrahman785
    @saleemrahman7852 жыл бұрын

    Pritam is power

  • @fiost1489

    @fiost1489

    2 жыл бұрын

    He just lost that power. People can't trust him anymore

  • @saleemrahman785

    @saleemrahman785

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fiost1489 Edwin Is Tong Sampah

  • @fiost1489

    @fiost1489

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@saleemrahman785 Let me bring you back to the vice chairman of WP. He can't even comprehend simple questions. Can't string a coherent answer. Pritam and SL know this. So told him to declare " overwhelmed ". When pressed further, just say " no judgement for me". What clowns these are🤣 And if WP is the govt, he could be our Foreign minister. How to negotiate on Spore's behalf when he can't understand simple questions?

  • @saleemrahman785

    @saleemrahman785

    2 жыл бұрын

    If you are referring to Faizal Manap, then I will agree with you. The interview was awful and was a simple question but he don't want or insist to reply. Maybe he just want to give a hard time for PAP. From this whole saga, you can see the PAP clearly waste a lot of time in doing this. The person lied and resigned and jwe have to move on from there. This investigation is targetted to know more about WP internal discussion and thought process. In summary, the PAP has created a circus and all of the clowns are up there questioning things that has no added value.

  • @lidna82
    @lidna822 жыл бұрын

    Waste of taxpayer money again on poor entertainment. If there is enough proof to indict PS, the parliament would have done so. These sessions are as I observed, an exchange of 'I say' vs 'what did you say'. RK is a self professed liar and has lost all credibility. Case closed.

  • @Thatturquoisekid
    @Thatturquoisekid2 жыл бұрын

    Actually there's no need for all of this.

  • @limrobert7837
    @limrobert78372 жыл бұрын

    E Tong, you asked a hypothetical question like "Why do you think S Khan lied? May I ask you E Tong, "Why did S Khan lied?" E Tong you are an embarrassment to Singaporeans

  • @yk597
    @yk5972 жыл бұрын

    Stop wasting precious tax payer monies to investigate the "truth" and try to fix WP with this opportunity. The truth is clear for everyone to see. Raeesah lied and attempted to push the blame to her party.

  • @leechengho8407

    @leechengho8407

    2 жыл бұрын

    You've indeed nailed it hard with ur strong rebuttal towards ET n without any doubt, surely more Sporeans will agree with u.

  • @sultansingh1316
    @sultansingh13162 жыл бұрын

    What is Edwin Tong's body of work ? First, Edwin Tong represented City Harvest's key persons who got off very lightly over huge sums (millions) misappropriated. Second, Edwin Tong is attempting to rely on Raeesah's rendition even though she had been found to have lied to the police & what makes Edwin Tong think Raeesah wont lie again? The way Edwin Tong badgered Pritam is mind boggling. Shouldnt Raeesah send her allegation to Pritam & give Pritam a chance to confirm or refute it?

  • @inc.kitten2175
    @inc.kitten21752 жыл бұрын

    Hey Edwin Tong, perhaps it was slow brain day for you; we all have this some days, don’t worry and don’t feel bad. But in case you never recover from it, speculating why she may have lied is, by far, a really dumb thing to do. There may be no good reason at all such as, you letting out a fart at 6:15pm this evening instead of at 6:10pm when no one is around. There could also be many and multiple reasons. Or, and get this, she may not even know why she lied. Pritam telling you to have her undergo a psychiatric evaluation is simply one way of telling you, hey, this is one explanation we could feasibly explore instead of sitting here speculating and gossiping like two old grannies with nothing better to do. In other words, go bark somewhere else. Not going to play this dumb game with ya. Ok?

  • @jeremyalg8192
    @jeremyalg81922 жыл бұрын

    Utter waste of taxpayers money to "Fix" the so called truth. What a freaking circus show, please focus on the endemic, WTF man.

  • @zalmohdsazale3950
    @zalmohdsazale39502 жыл бұрын

    Solid mr pratap very cool and straight forward...mr tong keep on repeat the question and twist question. VOTE for WP in future this is the way as leader talk...

  • @danielajean7295
    @danielajean72952 жыл бұрын

    There's no way Mr Tong asked that question why RK would still lie even with his senior members, it is because she probably had to lie to protect herselves from potential scoldings and to stay in the party. Its like a friend of me who asked me to lend him a sum of money to do investment ended up getting scammed. He first told me that he got scammed of $2000 and needed time to repay. Caught his lie after a few days when one of his friends complained. In actuality, he was scammed $10000. As friends and I already know he lied, he still lie in our conversation about the sum. All I can think is because he dont want me to judge him or scold him for what he did. It could be a similar reasoning to RK

  • @RajRaj-zx4rf
    @RajRaj-zx4rf Жыл бұрын

    Pritam Singh Is a very good lawyer.

  • @francis2382
    @francis23822 жыл бұрын

    really like pritam singh here in this. here is a great example where there is already a narrative formed in edwin tong’s mind about this situation. i think it is really rude for edwin tong to reject the suggestion of psychiatric assessment of raeesah immediately, without giving much consideration. and how could he ask such a question, where he seeks an answer on the mindset of raeesah during those times, to pritam? how would he have known? even if pritam gave an answer to edwin, it would be deemed inaccurate as raeesah herself didn’t mention it. but i’d assume edwin will accept the answer anyway as it would have fit nicely in the narrative formed in his head.

  • @skychaos87

    @skychaos87

    2 жыл бұрын

    To be fair, Pritam has no authority or right to ask for a psychiatric assessment of Raeesah. Imagine if Raessah ask for a psychiatric assessment of Pritam, that makes no sense right? The role of the committee is to hear the story from both sides and cross examine them not take sides, they have to assume both sides are trying their best to fight for their own benefits and they have to question them hard to find loopholes in their story.

  • @mohamedhaniff4021
    @mohamedhaniff40212 жыл бұрын

    Firstly where is a neutral party to clarify about in this case.. How can it be fair

  • @fiost1489

    @fiost1489

    2 жыл бұрын

    Truth will be the judge

  • @jeremyalg8192
    @jeremyalg81922 жыл бұрын

    The Chairman is a mute??? ET capacity as a committee member is a joke for all to see. 🤣

  • @CharlieTan-kl5tf
    @CharlieTan-kl5tf2 жыл бұрын

    The poor lady resigned, finished what are they going after? All these bullying for nine hours is just another ' over-killed' and could back fire. Let the people who voted for WP decide and in four years time the results will show who is the actual winner. Hang in there PS! You are doing a great job listening Mate!

  • @ethanang3527

    @ethanang3527

    2 жыл бұрын

    PAP is planning to take everything back in 2025 elections.

  • @limrobert7837

    @limrobert7837

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@ethanang3527 planning is one thing but the decision lies with the voters.

  • @ashunknown9728

    @ashunknown9728

    2 жыл бұрын

    People will still vote WP

  • @YewMag
    @YewMag2 жыл бұрын

    Ms Khan had took the ownership and move on by resigning. The intention for the committee thereafter clearly trying to seek the truth whether the opposition party and members are aware and supporting the anecdote. My honest opinion is that WP actually knows that if announce earlier is a lie, their party also will be whacked so they might as well gambled on a chance. A chance no one will pursue. If the previous WP leader still in charge, I have feeling, Khan sure admit the lie immediately and not wait till the last minute. All I can say is a bad gamble. PS: Never think that the parliament is like Twitter where you can talk shit and no need to prove anything. I hope the future of our MPs, especially those young MPs do not act like a pair of “skinny jeans”, trending yes but functions like crap.

  • @gracelim2336

    @gracelim2336

    2 жыл бұрын

    Good Point. Must Improve Our Political System so that the Young Ignorant and Greedy will Not Fall into the Trap of Cunning and Untrustworthy Politicians

  • @edwardh50g
    @edwardh50g2 жыл бұрын

    I think that's the way RK communicate to her aides of what to do. Effectively, it meant: 1. You both don't need to do anything on the anecdote. I don't want (or not ready) to talk about it. (So don't ask me on that nor the sexual assault) 2. You both need to help me with the Muslim issue clarification statement.

  • @coolio5975
    @coolio59752 жыл бұрын

    I wish Donald Trump is given a chance to contest with Tong 🤣

  • @MegaTonyng
    @MegaTonyng2 жыл бұрын

    ET chose to believe Liar RK over PS. Clearly, the COP inquiry was biased from the start. What a joke

  • @shazamacaroniwithcheese296
    @shazamacaroniwithcheese2962 жыл бұрын

    What a waste of taxpayers money having this committee. She already resigned as an MP. Move on. No one cares

  • @himivea5862
    @himivea58622 жыл бұрын

    PAP trying their best to bring WP down…I support WP even more after this because they have a good leader. A good leader has the back of their team and protect them and guide, not just throw them in the dirt when sh*t hit the fan. Unlike PAP!

  • @luakimteng
    @luakimteng2 жыл бұрын

    People will judge who is telling the truth and who is fair.

  • @steevetan3347
    @steevetan33472 жыл бұрын

    ET, u have your call… however as a SGean, a citizen. We have our call too… when u decided to take up e case for City Harvest Church, we have made our own call too! While it’s your Prerogative we have our values and prerogative too… each their yard stick… but many eyes on the look out…

  • @keithgan1722
    @keithgan17222 жыл бұрын

    Wasting time and resources debating over a liar. Nobody knows why she lied because she will take it to her grave.

  • @weiyongl
    @weiyongl2 жыл бұрын

    Sorry mr tong. i think u did clearly ask for pritams opinion and he gave it.

  • @helloitshash
    @helloitshash2 жыл бұрын

    Lets not forget ET was the one who fought for KH right?

  • @justingarnell8355
    @justingarnell83552 ай бұрын

    When inquiry is made up of only a certain party, when truth is presented… you be the judge…

  • @Diskojesuz
    @Diskojesuz2 жыл бұрын

    ET and RK needs to go to jail for wasting country’s resources and everybody’s time.

  • @yfsiah1939
    @yfsiah19392 жыл бұрын

    Noone here can truly vouch for Pritnam's integrity if you have not worked with him closely. But do we really believe that he will so stupid to blatantly give RK the leeway to continue lying and risk jeopardizing the party which has come so far. Extra investigation, extra time. What an unnessecary utilisation of our national resources!

  • @yvvonelee5026
    @yvvonelee50262 жыл бұрын

    Edwin Tong you finally met your Waterloo.

  • @vincelim1745
    @vincelim17452 жыл бұрын

    Next time doing recording. Dont just take whatsapps message . Tong, a coin have two side of flower. IF you are Second Minister of Law, how can you as Minister of Law, base on people whatsapps . You want to solve a issue, bring all the people to Committee Privilege hearing. not just base this and that whatsapps message.

  • @financialcafe

    @financialcafe

    2 жыл бұрын

    Plus there's such a thing called a lie detector

  • @cupcake125
    @cupcake1252 жыл бұрын

    Honestly Edwin Tong isnt making ANY SENSE at all. I think he's just really afraid and stressed to face Pritam Cuz Pritam is so eloquent and knows his shit so well that he doesn't know how to take him down...

  • @ethanang3527
    @ethanang3527 Жыл бұрын

    ~ Be careful what you do, cause the lie become the truth, hey hey. “Billie Jean” written, produced and sung by King of Pop Michael Jackson. Hopefully Edwin Tong knows what he is doing. I am using this statement quoting from it to prove that ET is absurd in his accusation towards Pritam Singh. Go on Pritam. Disappointed by the PAP action.

  • @musthady8004
    @musthady80042 жыл бұрын

    when to finish lie is lie, why drag others members in this saga, we have alot to focus for sgporean. put a full stop pls. punish a liar that the point.

  • @gnome1645
    @gnome16452 жыл бұрын

    Just look at his eyes.

  • @cjhalfred8173
    @cjhalfred81732 жыл бұрын

    Ask people not to interrupt but end up interrupting the whole time

  • @chrisching5633
    @chrisching56332 жыл бұрын

    ET just won’t give up to get d answer he wants🤣

  • @limrobert7837

    @limrobert7837

    2 жыл бұрын

    ET has his own agenda because he is PAP and holds Minister position getting paid millions a year .

  • @raytan1661

    @raytan1661

    2 жыл бұрын

    Maybe need to go home and poo green shit out first...before another round of boxing trying to win

  • @Thunder97629
    @Thunder976292 жыл бұрын

    Mr singh speak very good English

  • @IbL-ys8pb
    @IbL-ys8pb2 жыл бұрын

    ET talks more than Pritam. So, who is questioning whom?

  • @wiseguy9980
    @wiseguy99802 жыл бұрын

    PS should lead GRC in Marine Parade in the next GE. Showdown 2.0 with ET please

  • @fiost1489

    @fiost1489

    2 жыл бұрын

    Don't know if he would still be around. Don't be surprised by his resignation

  • @ethanang3527
    @ethanang3527 Жыл бұрын

    Be careful what you do, cause the lie will become the truth.

  • @MohdAshraffAHamid
    @MohdAshraffAHamid11 ай бұрын

    ET supposed to inquire instead of interrogation. Who's the criminal? What a circus by PAP

  • @miny2751
    @miny275111 ай бұрын

    Frankly my respect for Pritam Singh has grown over the years. Pritam has handled it well. I absolutely felt disgusted by how Edwin Tong trying to behave in such an elitist and authorative manner with no respect for others and with such low EQ. Can't imagine how ET will have the commitment and passion to serve in the government.

  • @crystalady88
    @crystalady882 жыл бұрын

    Common pap, it's pathetic

  • @irondeadshot4926
    @irondeadshot49262 жыл бұрын

    I lost my respect for Mr. Edwin Tong.

  • @kmanlykmanly8624
    @kmanlykmanly86242 жыл бұрын

    RK is truly a liability to the worker's party the minute she joins the party. What kind of MP lies again, again, and again in parliament?

  • @ralineshah3095
    @ralineshah30952 жыл бұрын

    Send RK for physchiatric check pls. I will sponsor for the expenses......and ET if you want to tag along for the check...my pleasure. Check one and get one check for free.

  • @spyketan72
    @spyketan722 жыл бұрын

    RK is a compulsive liar, by now everyone who follows knows that. What or why she lies I bet she herself cannot explain. RK is stacking lies on top of lies, there is no way to know which sentence or word is a lie anymore, not even herself and yet this gentleman can read her mind, outstanding.

  • @winwinwin282828
    @winwinwin2828282 жыл бұрын

    Edwin tong is a clown .

  • @jimmunsw4795
    @jimmunsw47952 жыл бұрын

    Not enough proof to pin down PS (1) , nice try but try harder ~ ET (0)

  • @brandenburg2388
    @brandenburg2388 Жыл бұрын

    Edwin Tong is no longer acting as the impartial chairman of the enquiry but as a prosecutor against the Opposition....

  • @alexteo1156
    @alexteo11562 жыл бұрын

    Why..? Just a hypothesis. But. Not uncommon for a liar to cover up a preceding lie with more lies in effort to appear consistent, especially to protect her own image in front of her closest associates.

  • @kaister901
    @kaister9012 жыл бұрын

    What dumb lawyer asks a third person. Why do you think that person lied? The fk? The only way anyone can know why a person lied is, if they were that person..... That's why you use evidence instead of assumptions to look at what they lied about and not why. To then decide on how bad the after math of the lie is. Then take action based on the after math of that lie. You can never ever find out the real why to their lie. A lawyer should know this....

  • @lucytheodas9808
    @lucytheodas98082 жыл бұрын

    OMG must read all the comments. All very negative view of Edwin Tong’s conduct. Very sleazy and slimy snake. Cannot have this kind of character in our government.

  • @monicarai1497

    @monicarai1497

    Жыл бұрын

    He's got no game. Not worthy of discussion.

  • @catcha1234
    @catcha12342 жыл бұрын

    Hahaha ah tong got stunt like a vegetable once pritam deny what khan had said

  • @whoopee075
    @whoopee0752 жыл бұрын

    You can’t presume why someone did what they do. Only the individual can answer and that is RK. I think even law dramas ask better qns than ET. Ridiculous line of hostile questioning. And to assume that what wasn’t said or done by PS equates to hiding facts and making lies is just plain fabrication.

  • @AmbaSnakeman
    @AmbaSnakeman2 жыл бұрын

    You ask why she may have lied, but its not fair to quote of knowledge learnt later?

  • @ConradSNIPER
    @ConradSNIPER Жыл бұрын

    " Denial is NOT CONVINCING " Very Doubtful + Suspicious ! ADMIT IT - POONKI

  • @zahidallapitchay9366
    @zahidallapitchay9366 Жыл бұрын

    PAP EDWIN TONG STANDBY 🚑

  • @alvingomez4208
    @alvingomez4208Ай бұрын

    V good DEBATE FOR NEXT GENERATION OF LAW STUDENTS

  • @ytrandomrecaps
    @ytrandomrecaps2 жыл бұрын

    The question that matters is why TODAYonline titled the video this way?

  • @leitan1050
    @leitan10502 жыл бұрын

    Look at the expression when he talk.. he is a big liar.!!!!

  • @jpphua602
    @jpphua6022 жыл бұрын

    In order to commit a crime there must be a motive to benefit oneself. How does encouraging Ms khan to lie benefit the WP? So, to all the "smart" people out there... what's the motive?

  • @asherang9206
    @asherang92062 жыл бұрын

    this feel more like a deposition...

  • @thanapillai8069
    @thanapillai80692 жыл бұрын

    When RK fabricate the lie, she did not require WP, PS or SL help but to own up to the truth she needed their approval. What a joke .

  • @janetchong5048
    @janetchong504811 ай бұрын

    There us a fool born everyday😂😂😂😂

  • @mariantia926
    @mariantia9262 жыл бұрын

    Ed Tong, PS is not God to truly decipher the truth underlying reason of RK lying. He is not her father. Even you yourself Ed Tong, you are also not God to decipher RK root cause lying.. Utimately it is RK own inner man, holy spirit know best. Human is no longer wiser than a pig. Reason being, we are too focus on knowledge and not on wisdom for more deeper understanding of emotional, psychological over mental mind. If Ed tong have know about this wording meaning, 一切为心造,it is the heart of men in everything we do, which lead to mind. Furthermore, If you have read, study about all the books of Dr John D Young, 杨定一全部生命系列,you will have a total change of approach in heart and mind. More law only made human less and less human but robot.. Anyway, you won't not have God wisdom even you gathered all knowledge in law, God is high above law..

  • @encesolezera506

    @encesolezera506

    2 жыл бұрын

    wonderfully said. "More law only made human less and less human but robot"

  • @ongernie7216
    @ongernie72162 жыл бұрын

    We need to set up another COP to investigate these bunch of COP. This is totally shame to the system to comes to such a ridiculous stage.

  • @batuksri
    @batuksri2 жыл бұрын

    What his full name ah? Izzit Edwin Tong Koh Song?

  • @ongernie7216
    @ongernie7216 Жыл бұрын

    Edwin Tong is telling the whole world that he is just trying to get Mr. Singh to admit to everything he put up. Is this the way a lawyer ways of forcefully trying to put words into a defendence mouth and get him to admit to it. These is rather absurb. This world is getting crazy.

  • @user-ic7fo8ic9p
    @user-ic7fo8ic9p2 жыл бұрын

    ET claimed at the start of the session, he asked PS on his view whether there was anything unusual/untoward on her performance as MP. PS said nothing out of ordinary. One can suffer from disassociation and still carry on functions of MP. What is ET asking listeners to infer when connected PS' disclosure of RK's disassociation problem with his answer on RK's normal MP performance? ET could have just asked outright whether PS have ever detected inconsistencies in RK's behavior, conversations etc in her interactions with him or other WP members before RK's disclosure of her disassociation problem on 29 Nov 21 to WP. Since now there is new info on RK psychiatric condition, why don't just proceed to have psychiatric examination of RK, the truth will be out sooner and no need to waste further time on inquiry? If indeed RK has this condition, it could explain all the inconsistencies in the hearings and RK's behavior.

Келесі