Strong question posed by Singh and let wait for next GE to see if there is such candidates .

Mr Singh💪👍

Unexpectedly question become unrelavant question. A question become a question. A question is answered with a question. Finally no answer. Conclusion is no answer is a answer. Its been answered.

WHEN is the PAP going back to discuss Ivan Lim. He was a PAP candidtate for Jurong GRC for GE2020. He was criticized by members of the public. His party told him to defend himself. The party did not defend him. Ivan Lim withdrew. Lawrence Wong stated the PAP candidate selection process is "thorough and robust". Lee Hsien Long added "he has confidence" (in the process). If this is the case, why did the PAP not defend Ivan Lim? When is the PAP going back to the public to discuss the Ivan Lim saga? It has been over two years since GE2020. Singaporeans are still waiting for an explanation from the PAP why it chose Ivan Lim and did not defend his selection.

@acheeyk

Жыл бұрын

Snake charmer in action...

Anyone who watched this heavily edited patchwork should watch the uncut version.

Not every good lawyer can win in a debate...When they are cornered...The only thing they can do is twist and turn...And They are trained to do that...

@SuperHongTay

11 ай бұрын

Pritamh is also a lawyer

Both being lawyers can spar till cows come back without commiting any straight answer - wasting taxpayers' money, most disgusting.

Looks like WWE ? A very positive debate and it's good for singapore. This is meritocracy.

Pritam Singh should just ask Shanmugam in the latter's own style which is "just answer in a simple Yes or No, please" and stick to that. Shanmugam claims he can't make decisions as he is not the PM but he is amongst the first ones to have an opinion about anything and everything...even standing up to protect his party members. The hypocrisy is so overpowering!

This guy is so slippery. Not willing to answer straight up questions while accusing others of shifting the goal post. Very slippery indeed.

Both talking in circles and the issues were never addressed at all ..... more about making the issues political .......

What is the meaning of 'aspersion'?

@VS-yk3gu

11 ай бұрын

I was thinking the same😊 about to Google

he forget so he is corret in scoring points for pap .

The Law Minister dodged a question regarding the aspersion and PAP’s stance on gays standing for elections. Then he claimed that the opposition party member shifted goal posts. That’s how I see this clip.

Pritam Singh has more balls then the entire PAP put together. This is like the late Karpal Singh of Msia...who stood by his principles till his death. Without Karpal, the DAP has completely lost its principles.

What is good character? I think PAP minister need to define that clearly.

The identity of Singapore is love and kindness based upon proper knowledges, beyond religions, cultures, nationalities and races. Democracy without proper knowledges will develop a disconcerted and widespread disputes in small dots. Whilst this innovative order is to allow love and kindness having its function towards LGBT, it also deter improper knowledge for LGBT to have complete democracy in Singapore. The PAP can lost its governing power, but cannot lost its proper knowledge of a democratic Singapore

Well done Workers Party and especially to Mr Pritam Singh! The FACT that Mr Shanmugam does not even DARE to state category that ALL Singaporeans, REGARDLESS of race, language, religion and SEXUAL ORIENTATION has already itself shown what the PAP’s position was on this issue! That not all Singaporeans are seen and treated EQUALLY with what should be their ENTITLED Civil liberties as a citizen of this country! Not to mention the fact that PAP loves to Character Assassinate their political opponents using the state media as a tool for their agenda.

@etjan555

Жыл бұрын

Well done my foot......

@raywing00

Жыл бұрын

PAP good stand there. With morality as a basis.

I am surprised by the PAP minister. ermmmmmmm politicians.

As usual Pappigs flip its prata when cornered and forever contradict its own bullshit policies just to win the argument....

@CalvinK300

Жыл бұрын

2:00 Pritam asked “what’s the relevance of the viewpoint in sex with boys”. How did the PAP flip the prata?

@hagisno

Жыл бұрын

@@CalvinK300 Listen to the reply man....

@CalvinK300

Жыл бұрын

@@hagisno I heard but I don’t see the prata. That’s why I asked you for your interpretation. In fact if you have good observation, Pritam didn’t pursue this line of argument. In other words, by bringing up the pedophilia Pritam scored an own goal. That’s why he let the matter go. Understand?

@burhan999

Жыл бұрын

@@hagisno you must be oppig

@hagisno

Жыл бұрын

@@burhan999 You must be Pappigs idiotic voters ....

There is 1. .8 million china PRC in Singapore . Why they are not talking about it.

@mangotango7647

11 ай бұрын

Malaysia's situation is worst. Missing PRC. They came in but never leave. They are ghost citizens.

If he had said is just admit like a gentlemen and not to twist and turn his way out

Mr PAP Lite, Reigning Party loves an 'Opposition' like you

😅can't stand in discussion with pritam.

So all PAP members are in favour of sex between men including those Muslims MPs and ministers, not discounting the fact that Islam prohibits such things and curses those who indulge in those kind of activities.... Let the Muslim members in the PAP stand up and make their positions clear on this matter... Any Muslims who support such things have indeed lost their faith!!!

Gay, pedophila n incest sex, aren’t these sexual orientation or preference? 🤔

@acheeyk

Жыл бұрын

Consent or not ,pay or not,we are going to have a gay club soon. Another new business n revenues for the gov,just like carbon tax in disguise of climate change prevention. Human race will be extinct soon just like other creatures before us. Too greedy ....

@raywing00

Жыл бұрын

They are the same, but some hypocrites will deny them.

@davidarchangels6500

10 ай бұрын

Its perversion...

If a candidate actively participates in a forum that allows conversations about underage sex or paedophiliac behaviours, then i would support the questioning of his/her intentions. I think shanmugam was perfectly reasonable in his reply.

How to answer a question without answering a question.

The opposite party trying to be the woke party can recruit all your gay candidates for all you like, who is to stop you? But why has this any relevance to how PAP recruits its own candidates?

Pritam, Pritam, Pritam… You must understand that MPs are people who will be involved in shaping policies and such. It would be a disaster if you let a pro-immorality candidate into the Parliament. So no, please drop this nonsense advocating for that.

Shan keep on flipping..anything but answering the answer....I will vote WP for life

@etjan555

Жыл бұрын

HAHAHA....BRO ONLY ARSENAL FOR LIFE....PARTY CAN CHANGE😂😂😂

Azab nanti...