Пікірлер

• 
  @TWARDOWSKY.27 күн бұрын

  It's a good thing we have government regulations and requirements, as well as independent NCAP tests today. In this capitalist system, they are the foundation of our safety. Otherwise, manufacturers would put us in a tin cola can and charge us as if it were a car.

• 
  @matthewhuszarik4173Ай бұрын

  All three are used as marketing terms. Almost interchangeably depending of manufacturer.

• 
  @Foxbody429Ай бұрын

  Informative 👌

• 
  @teagreen22202 ай бұрын

  Yes, the power is gained from denser intake charge, cooler, and the increased timing that this will allow. Methanol and water injection is commonly used so that increased timing can then be run. If you don’t dynamically set the timing with water injection it can be really bad if you run out of water.

• 
  @barenekid96952 ай бұрын

  Geee How novel !! Germany developed (MW50) water methanol injection to allow High boosts in 1942 !! What day of the week is it for you.. Mate ??

• 
  @adamladuzko78972 ай бұрын

  trevor from gta 💀

• 
  @crd-nz_0012 ай бұрын

  I must see things differently. Water injection doesn't cool the intake charge. The cooling only occurs once the compression stroke starts. Just before ignition, cylinder temps are above 400C°, at which point the water has absorbed heat and turned to steam. When ignition occurs, the steam continues to absorb heat and expands at a rate greater than the accompanied air. This expansion boosts the force on the piston, increasing torque and keeps peak temperatures under 1100C° at which point Nitrogen will "burn" and create NOx emissions. If the engine is over rich, particulate count (soot, or carbon) skyrockets. It's not as simple as hosing down the intake with water and reeping the benefits. The engine has to be built for the purpose. Nitrous Oxide engines are a good example. Same for Alcohol, or NitroMethane. Build the engine knowing what it will run on, and it will take full advantage of the fuel.

• 
  @Platypus_Warrior2 ай бұрын

  You sound like a nice guy, the video could be longer. I subscribed

• 
  @autotechtvАй бұрын

  I appreciate that!

• 
  @Challenge_me_geek2 ай бұрын

  Does the oil need changing more often??

• 
  @GamingPro-fy5mz2 ай бұрын

  Hello please is bmw v10 engine works for bmw e46 ?

• 
  @sasmit822 ай бұрын

  Lot of group b turbo rally cars used the same system to keep the engine from exploding. Audi Quattro used this I think also fuel injection from Bosch

• 
  @thomasbernard69012 ай бұрын

  Yeah i am just waiting winter to check if water hasn't turn into ice

• 
  @davisrs12 ай бұрын

  It has to be washer fluid or water/methanol!🤣

• 
  @Lutchoj2 ай бұрын

  That's cool. Buuuut, now u need buy gas and desmiralizated water... Kkk

• 
  @davisrs12 ай бұрын

  I use dehumidifier water. Or even distilled water is less than a dollar per gallon.

• 
  @danmaycock92382 ай бұрын

  What if; you used screenwash/coolant instead?

• 
  @gnawty2 ай бұрын

  I poured water straight into my fuel tank and hopefully it will do the same thing, cheers 👍👍

• 
  @davisrs12 ай бұрын

  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

• 
  @cesaravigliano16532 ай бұрын

  Lol😂 let us know how it went!

• 
  @Victor-pb7rn2 ай бұрын

  water in the engine 😂 , come on

• 
  @breatharian20092 ай бұрын

  The Commer TS3 is king

• 
  @arthurrobinson28033 ай бұрын

  This is not a new idea. The German aircraft company Junkers was using a six cylinder version of this motor in a seaplane they were building before the start of WWII. The same motor was being used in commercial passenger aircraft that could fly non-stop from Germany to Argentina because they were so fuel efficient. The narrator of this video said the US military has been using this type of motor for 80 years. Since just after WWII. This is a technology that the US government has been keeping from the public all that time! This is something environmentalists should be upset about. Just think about how many billions of less barrels of fuel that would have been burned if the semi truck manufacturers had of started putting motor's like this in trucks right after WWII! A smaller version could have been used in cars too. The oil companies are, no doubt, the one's that actually behind keeping it suppressing it and still are, as far as I can tell. The Achates motor has been developed for about 10 years now and I still don't see it being offered or advertised in anything. Achates has or at least did have a video on KZread about it. He says in his video that his motor's are just an improved version of the Junkers motor. He has a 3 cylinder motor he developed to fit in full size pickup trucks and a 6 cylinder for semi trucks. I'm sure truck driver's, pickup driver's and car driver's would all love to buy a vehicle that gets 50% better mileage! But, the oil companies would loose billions per year in sales and the public would be able to keep all those billions of dollars. They can't have that!!!

• 
  @guifrakss3 ай бұрын

  shit video

• 
  @SynthD3 ай бұрын

  What’s crazy, even in slow mo, the airbags deploy almost instantaneously.

• 
  @mwizachavura83993 ай бұрын

  What are you talking about "from max torque to max power" as if the two are different ends of mechanical input, max torque is what makes max power, in power u just consider rotational speed

• 
  @WindscreensWest3 ай бұрын

  Very interesting. Just bought a 2024 X Trail E-Power with the 3 cylinder version of this innovative engine...

• 
  @sergeant58483 ай бұрын

  Couldn't make you're own content? Had to steal someone elses? Lazy Lazy Lazy.

• 
  @dennisdanquah83174 ай бұрын

  Cvt transmissions are garbage

• 
  @movieclipscobrakia99718 күн бұрын

  If you don't know how to drive, you can drive like that

• 
  @JasonJohnson-kq2eq4 ай бұрын

  So it’s a snowmobile clutch. Not a new thing yet again. Any new inventions in the last 70 years?

• 
  @Psalms91-nc9wo4 ай бұрын

  yes, bring it to market, last year, put it in everything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

• 
  @jetscreamer14 ай бұрын

  This is Star Trek tech for today.

• 
  @PrestigeWorldwide-XXII4 ай бұрын

  BMW IS CRAP

• 
  @ekspatriat4 ай бұрын

  Don't care how sophisticated....still operated and manned by Chinese...enough said!!

• 
  @LMO1694 ай бұрын

  They are only build there for the Chinese market. All other engines are from Munch, Hams Hall or Steyr.

• 
  @ekspatriat4 ай бұрын

  Good. The sl...Ey BS..... are a curse@@LMO169

• 
  @guitarmanchad4 ай бұрын

  The engines made in China are China Market only. UK, EU and US are made in Austria, Munich and UK

• 
  @Lissica14 ай бұрын

  Ein weiterer Grund keine deutschen Autos mehr zukaufen! Hier in Deutschland Leute ausstellen aber Technologie und Geld aus Deutschland in China auf die Straße werfen! Und jeder der in China produziert ist Teil des Systems dort! Und die Autoindustrie sollte sich mal überlegen wer ihre Naziautos die nichtmal fahren wenn Sie nicht online sind oder man kein Teil selbst tauschen kann, kaufen will, ich ganz sicher nicht!

• 
  @Mega1ok4 ай бұрын

  german car:chinese engine,spanish headlights,italian vacuum pump and so on

• 
  @chooyatam4 ай бұрын

  Incredible how such an effort and scrupulosity is put to produce a machine that will most likely wear out prematurely by design.

• 
  @OhSoddit4 ай бұрын

  It'll be interesting to see how this pans out over time. I get the impression German engineering mastered the art of designing something to last "just past" the warranty period. E.g. designed to "wear" in a predictable fashion - causing catastrophic failure after a predefined lifespan. Gone are the days things were built to LAST a long time - for if they did, you wouldn't need to buy another one......

• 
  @marklowe74314 ай бұрын

  Very true. With their servicing b/s always change oil twice as often as the service interval.

• 
  @tonywilliams67654 ай бұрын

  First comment

• 
  @scrambler69-xk3kv4 ай бұрын

  That is why if you floor it and the engine just drones, it is spooling up. In other words, one pully is opening up/getting wider and the other is closing up getting narrower. and they cannot do this instantly, it takes a while. I in essence that is how they change gears. You actually get faster acceleration if you progressively press on the accelerator as opposed to just smacking it to the floor.

• 
  @michaelriebandt67542 ай бұрын

  Operates like My Yamaha Snowmobile. Still not big fan of these transmissions. To many drawbacks not good for Sustained speeds, sudden accelerations from stop, fluid changes every 30,000 miles (Customers are not going change fluid every 30,000 miles) and towing not recommended. I drive a 2016 Chrysler 200C AWD transmission fluid is good around 100,000 miles.

• 
  @raiyu19852 ай бұрын

  Yep. My 10th Gen Honda Accord 1.5 has a little delay to accelerate. Unlike manual conventional transmission in the past, real acceleration was palpable.

• 
  @rolexr5 ай бұрын

  For me…any car which gets power to 4 wheels is a 4x4 or a 4WD or AWD period. No matter if it’s permanent or partially, manually or automatically!

• 
  @absk6014 ай бұрын

  you've never been out in the wild

• 
  @rolexr4 ай бұрын

  @@absk601...what does that have to do with it? It's all about the name! And...I drive a Subaru XV / Crosstrek.

• 
  @absk6014 ай бұрын

  @@rolexr in outdoors and backcountry trips in rough terrains, AWD is just a gimmick. Proper off-roading can only happen in a 4x4 system. I am regularly exposed to those conditions and can say it without hesitation that your statement is very contradictory.

• 
  @rolexr4 ай бұрын

  @@absk601...man...the term 4x4 means all wheels are driven - or not? AWD means all wheels are driven - or not? That´s all that I wanted to say. Not how capable or different the systems are! So a Jeep Wrangler is a 4x4 and a Jeep Compass is a 4x4 or not?

• 
  @KingOdin10284 ай бұрын

  Try taking a turn in your 4x4 or 4WD with it engaged on street roads😅 this is why knowledge is important even when you don’t think so. Good luck! Can’t say you wernt told

• 
  @texasextremetire5 ай бұрын

  Dumbest idea ever .. no way that’s a good handling vehicle..

• 
  @markemery77415 ай бұрын

  Unlike my Toyota 5 speed with 342k miles that still works perfectly the CVT will fail as I have seen in my step sons Altima, Chrysler, and another car I can not remember. They are junk. All failed under 100k miles.

• 
  @madeup64 ай бұрын

  Lol you just mentioned two of the worst car brands in existence.

• 
  @mailmanjoe4 ай бұрын

  Nissan and Chrysler are probably the worst CVT's out there. You get Toyota's ECVT and it's a whole different story.

• 
  @contrettoomega84575 ай бұрын

  This video helped me sooo much!!! Love how detailed the video is!!!!

• 
  @bobolovemechanic6 ай бұрын

  You can possibly make it variable compression ratio throughout the operation of the engine from 8:1 to 9,5:1 without changing the fuel Octain level and the ignition, in the case of direct fuel injection the timing will have to follow up the change as well.

• 
  @BWeezy-sw1wy7 ай бұрын

  Burn time is constant and so if the rpm is higher you have to start burning sooner.

• 
  @rare_wubbox3607 ай бұрын

  Still, i cant see any compelling and mass produced BEVs from GM thats Why ther sales are tanking in a booming market GM is delaying ther BEVs.. how stupid of them.. rip

• 
  @Ttow497 ай бұрын

  Junk

• 
  @user-je7ih1wo9c4 ай бұрын

  Not junk at all.

• 
  @showtime3027 ай бұрын

  Like a10 speed bicycle

• 
  @rylibrace12763 ай бұрын

  Like a 650,000 speed bicycle

• 
  @y.3.y.3edits417 ай бұрын

  Great, informative video 👍

• 
  @billycalifornia11128 ай бұрын

  As much as I love a good ol’ Classic for these reasons I don’t really want to drive one much irl especially after I saw the 59’ Bel Air vs 09 Malibu crash test

• 
  @Mr.QuantumC0re5 ай бұрын

  I don’t mind I will die in my classic car no matter what ❤😤

• 
  @leoseries8 ай бұрын

  I still don't understand how the system works when switched to manual and offers (for example) a 5 gear selection on a system where actual gears do not exist.

• 
  @robert555356 ай бұрын

  the computer calculates the perfect ratio for that specific "gear set" and then translates it to the perfect belt placement. Watch at 0:54 to 1:10. the computer just has those perfect ratios set to achieve what would be those gears on a standard transmission! hope this helps!

• 
  @leoseries6 ай бұрын

  @@robert55535 Thanks for your explanation. I understand now (I think).

• 
  @Cris_P_Bacon.3 ай бұрын

  Same😂

• 
  @michaelriebandt67542 ай бұрын

  Ratios are Infinite. Apples to Oranges comparison.

• 
  @michaelriebandt67542 ай бұрын

  Engine r.p.m. is always at peak loud and engine wears faster.

• 
  @rickwarner80728 ай бұрын

  There is some incorrect information in this video. For example on the AWD the split between the front and rear is rarely 50/50. It's usually either 60/40 or 70/30. Also, there are variations of both AWD and 4WD so they are not all the same. Most AWD vehicles have a smart system so they are not giving power to all 4 wheels at once. It may be using only front wheel or rear wheel drive and then give power to the other wheels as they need it. I could go on but this is already long enough.

• 
  @marktaylor90838 ай бұрын

  I'm not sure I agree with your explanation either. Quite simply a 4 wheel drive train has a locked center differential which evenly distributes power to the front and back of the vehicle. An all wheel drive train has an open center differential which allows any amount of power to be delivered to either axle. Modern traction control applies brakes to the free spinning wheel to limit power to the wheel with no traction which distributes that power to another wheel. All wheel drive is preferred for paved or solid surface driving to allow the vehicle to turn without putting stress on the drive train. The outside wheels need to turn more revolutions during a turn.

• 
  @cesaravigliano16538 ай бұрын

  @@marktaylor9083thank you so much! I am the narrator for of the video and this is very useful! Thank you for taking the time to comment and I’ll see how to make them better in the future!

• 
  @longsleevethong14578 ай бұрын

  @@cesaravigliano1653 the title is misleading also….as there is no difference between 4wd and 4x4 which is probably why you didn’t make that clarification in the video.

• 
  @tjadventures7 ай бұрын

  @@marktaylor9083i don't really agree with your explanation either. As an example, Subarus usually have a viscous coupling center diff and some have rear lsd and some have front and rear lsd's, so open diffs don't necessarily define awd systems.

• 
  @craigbrown53598 ай бұрын

  Most outstanding