Пікірлер

• 
  @Tipsyfr21 сағат бұрын

  i got a really deep voice and i just want a mic that picks up my voice fully and naturally bc on the current mic i have it sounds weird and cuts off

• 
  @AntonBrowne14 сағат бұрын

  You could try the sE V7 Mk, it's fairly affordable.

• 
  @StratsRUsКүн бұрын

  It's a great pedal

• 
  @AlemskiКүн бұрын

  could you tell the difference between MD 445 and MD 431 please?

• 
  @pamboscharalambous37702 күн бұрын

  Hello Anton, Hope you are well... I think i mentioned it before but trust me, grab a Sennheiser e935 and review it. I trully believe its the diamond that somehow eacaped you 😊... its the mic for everyone out there who has been using an sm58 or a beta and ials looking for something that can capture more detail and clarity without the need of heavy EQ.

• 
  @yolindeparfitt97063 күн бұрын

  Beautiful 😍 prescious, profound! Thank you 🙏

• 
  @amadodegullacionjr28224 күн бұрын

  hello sir, I'm facing this kind of situation. i bought a Mackie 30ProFXV3 from a local church. they've been using for almost 3 years and most of the gain knob facing crackling noises. my question is, how's your mixer now? is it in good condition once you do the cleaning thing? it's been 2 years since you post this video. mind to share it?

• 
  @AntonBrowne3 күн бұрын

  It has held up well so far. I ended up biting the bullet and doing every single pot because the pans started going and then the fx, so I just did the lot and I can forget about it. Good luck.

• 
  @chelseatoye8484 күн бұрын

  Brilliant review, thank you :)

• 
  @AntonBrowne3 күн бұрын

  Thanks.

• 
  @enchanter9766 күн бұрын

  Nice and clean sound, love it's extended bass, that 30hz response😊

• 
  @AntonBrowne3 күн бұрын

  Yup, and it's more even than my Bose - L1 Pro8.

• 
  @enchanter9763 күн бұрын

  @AntonBrowne I love my sound's, that box is in a league of it's own, imagine 2 playing in stereo..

• 
  @Old_SnakeTwitch7 күн бұрын

  Do you by chance have any thoughts of the Line Audio CM4?

• 
  @lwinaus88108 күн бұрын

  Love the clip and it was a really nice comparison of those 3. I have a similar baritone voice to yours… that gets boomy at the low end… also could be described as muddy. The Earthworks sounded the best to me with the best definition. Thanks

• 
  @Old_SnakeTwitch9 күн бұрын

  Sounded very quiet considering its a studio condensor. When I hold my pencil condensor it ads a bunch of constant sub bass, even if im not moving at all

• 
  @BlueLou97410 күн бұрын

  As the neck never moved on a sub nano inch since 1976, dspite 3 refret, my StingRay II, MusicMan don't need to be unbolted. Nor tilted . never dare.

• 
  @Old_SnakeTwitch10 күн бұрын

  The V7X and MK is so good for the price, such a flat and extended dynamic. I have one on the way :)

• 
  @nathanwahl922414 күн бұрын

  I'm coming here 2 years later on the same search: I've got a low voice that goes down to an A1 chest (maybe an F#1 occasionally as I learn) up to an E4. Not much oomph below a B1 though. A year ago when I started exploring I started at a D2. I sing backing vocals and a few leads on a relatively noisy stage. All of a sudden my Sen e935 doesn't work down here very well. Above a D2 it was OK. My voice always sounds kind of 'hollow' and all you hear is the air if I get right on it, it seems; maybe a better mic would help that, too. All the mics mentioned in the video and comments discussion run from $400 to much more, out of my budget for our 3-piece cover band, or at least more than I want to spend. We only play out about 40 times a year, I guess 3 shows worth wouldn't be too bad. But... I was looking at the EV ND96 for around $200, much more in my price range. Very tight pattern. Reviews mention it being a 'fuller' sound, which I think I also need for the middle part of my range. Is there anything else out there that I might want to consider? Or just bite the bullet and look at the one Anton mentioned, or some others in the comment. Thanks for any input anyone can provide. My goodness that video, those two lowest notes!!

• 
  @AntonBrowne14 күн бұрын

  The sE V7 MK goes low at about £120!

• 
  @vinnitheratcatcher18 күн бұрын

  The best mic test on KZread.

• 
  @AntonBrowne15 күн бұрын

  Cheers.

• 
  @felixmartinez440020 күн бұрын

  Would you use a MD 431 to record studio vocals instead of the USA SM58?

• 
  @AntonBrowne15 күн бұрын

  For sure.

• 
  @eryckbry20 күн бұрын

  Nice! Did you use a nylon string IR preset from the pedal? Or did you add your own IR?

• 
  @AntonBrowne20 күн бұрын

  A preset.

• 
  @porfiriolocascio467222 күн бұрын

  Bravo

• 
  @AntonBrowne15 күн бұрын

  Cheers.

• 
  @mtd1234522 күн бұрын

  Earthworks SV33 records too much bass, sennheiser e945 is so good

• 
  @AntonBrowne22 күн бұрын

  I think it records what's there. It's easy to roll bass off if the source is too bassy, but it's not so easy to add bass naturally if the source is thin-sounding.

• 
  @vinnitheratcatcher23 күн бұрын

  thanks for that

• 
  @AntonBrowne15 күн бұрын

  My pleasure.

• 
  @aTouchoClass24 күн бұрын

  Sound advice, imo v. BTW, the MD431I is a gorgeous sounding mic.

• 
  @AntonBrowne15 күн бұрын

  Agreed!

• 
  @ascendediam25 күн бұрын

  Its a troll who trolls lying to people saying these can build big muscles by using these only when these never have did that they only build lean muscle

• 
  @AntonBrowne24 күн бұрын

  Don't know about big muscles, what use is that! It does build/maintain useful muscle though.

• 
  @bexraphaela25 күн бұрын

  If I was able to create a super special awesome uncle, you would be the one 😂 You're very entertaining while giving a perfect comparison review, thnx!

• 
  @AntonBrowne15 күн бұрын

  Thanks! 😃

• 
  @brewandthecrew29 күн бұрын

  The is the best analysis into the handling noise of multiple microphones I've been able to find. I'm already a fan of Earthworks' other microphones. This video has sealed the fate of my microphone budget.

• 
  @AntonBrowne15 күн бұрын

  Cheers and good luck with finances!

• 
  @bluwngАй бұрын

  I like anything that is clean and minimalist.

• 
  @AntonBrowne15 күн бұрын

  Me too.

• 
  @geespar1Ай бұрын

  These were obviously brought out to compete with the Sennheiser ND435 and 445 as Shure were getting somewhat ‘trounced’ by them - it would great to see/hear a comparison between them

• 
  @lee.isaac.richardАй бұрын

  Super useful, thanks for your work in putting this comparison together. This is thorough and authentic: just us, the mics, and your thoughts. Love it.

• 
  @AntonBrowne15 күн бұрын

  Glad it was helpful!

• 
  @DanieltorqueteАй бұрын

  Can you tell me the model name of the microphone you are talking about in the video?

• 
  @AntonBrowneАй бұрын

  I was using the Earthworks IconPro (or Ethos).

• 
  @aaronkillingsworth5612Ай бұрын

  Can we hear nexadyne vs Earthworks, DPA and Neumann

• 
  @JimmyChaos1985Ай бұрын

  Im a solo acoustic guitarist and tenor vocalist and I just bought this mic. Like most, all I’ve ever used for many years is the SM58. Im excited to try something different.

• 
  @polkiju7Ай бұрын

  Are these devices reversible assuming that one can cobble together the adapters? In other words, can you simply change the orientation?

• 
  @AntonBrowneАй бұрын

  I don't know but considering they are such simple hard-wired devices, I would think they might well.

• 
  @ninjabluewingsАй бұрын

  There has NEVER BEEN IN THE HISTORY OF SINGING!! been a singer that constantly sings 2 feet away from the microphone (unless you are an opera singer)

• 
  @R.C.BullarАй бұрын

  The Se is not spiky just because it has the most treble. It's still extremely smooth.

• 
  @krystjanchanerley9288Ай бұрын

  Do you own any shoes/boots by TRICKERS?

• 
  @AntonBrowneАй бұрын

  Sadly, I don't.

• 
  @alfredpirotta4944Ай бұрын

  Hi Anton, For years, I've travelled on the road of master keyboard, audio interface, laptop and amp. For a clean stereo image (for rotary simulators, pads etc.) I have used a small PA or powered speakers. On the laptop, I'd run a DAW but these days use Gig Performer which is an amazingly stable and reliable host. With such a setup, that has many advantages for me, earth loops were the first issue that arose between the components and seemed to scupper whole concept at the very outset. The simple answer was to get a Ground (or Earth) Loop Inhibitor (or isolator). These typically come in L and R channels and use RCA plugs to the audio output socket/s and then plug into your amp or desk. They can easily be had for around a tenner and totally remove the hum issue. Most of what's inside is just a big capacitor per channel.

• 
  @stevenjohnson4283Ай бұрын

  When I joined the Pentax forums I discussed Chromatic Aberrations with one chap and he informed me that CA's are there in lenses by design and it creates the 3D effect or dimensionality to an image. Its been 15 years since I heard that and I can concur that this is correct and when ever you see a lens producing CA's its a good or great thing IMO. So like at the cinema when you watch a 3D movie you buy a pair of cardboard glasses with one eye red and the other blue to fool your brain as you combine the images from both eyes you get the impression of dimensionality. Mix red and blue paint, you get purple down a single lens. The movie isn't as sharp but its very interesting all the same. Some of best lens manufacturers like Zeiss and Voightlander can have lenses with psychedelic CA's from wide open, and thats where they shine and the image looks most dimensional, but you need to shoot in monochrome to save the dimensionality in the image. In colour if you edit out the purple it might lose that 3D pop, or shoot without high contrast things in the frame if you can and it pops. But thats the thing, if there's fringing around high contrast objects, why isn't appearing in a low contrast scene? Thats because the CA's or light hitting the film or sensor at a slightly different time is simulating DEPTH or dimensionality. You don't have to believe me......... But the video game makers are also adding lens aberrations into their video games to make a more cinematic experience, like lens flares and lens bloom and adding CA's. There's in game footage in some youtube videos showing "With CA's turned on and with CA's turned off" and when they're on the image is has more ambience and dimensionality, but it loses some sharpness. Without CA's on the video game is sharper. Okay so thats where the problem is and that is about having a sharp image with CA's and dimensionality in a lens. Here is some in game footage with CA's on and off, and you can see there's more ambience and dimensionality with it on. kzread.info/dash/bejne/eJuCrKRxYLKappM.html Not just used in video games but in CG movies too. I've seen youtube videos where they CG an old scene from Star Wars and add lens aberration including CA's to give the image a more cinematic feel and ambience. In the video below they "Adds a healthy dose of CA's" along with many other lens aberrations to create that cinematic look. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fWeWwbWYodeol8Y.html So the photographic industry talks about CA's like its a dirty word and they review lenses by saying "CA's are well controlled" which means the lens has virtually no 3D pop. I've had those modern lenses for mirrorless with no CA's and no 3D pop, and I was looking at my files on the computer going "why does everything look so bland and boring and sterile and clinical". Sold it all and kept my Pentax gear. I like CA's because I know what they're doing in there. The problem with the modern stuff is that they're trying to get rid of the CA's so they're copying Zeiss's Distagon formula of having floating elements in a prime lens and sort of slicing the image via bokeh and how the out of focus areas are split up. So's that when you look at the image it looks kind of holographic at the depth of field and considerably before and after it. The $30,000 cinema lenses do this. But the modern for mirrorless lenses are doing it a little bit, plus having high edge to edge and corner to corner sharpness that all the lenses are now exactly the same from all the manufacturers. Modern photography wants and demands sterile lenses with no character, because they can add those things in post to a certain degree. They are taking the cinematic look out of the lenses in exchange for clinical sharpness and 2D flat images where objects can blend togther. But when a lens can separate tree branches and give a depth in the tree canopy and another lens simply cannot do it and it all merges, then thats when you have 2D lens.

• 
  @bomsabiduria2302Ай бұрын

  After watching this video it gives me a hope and strength to strive even do this life is full of hopelessness and hate

• 
  @barryfreeman4706Ай бұрын

  I purchased the cardioid version last week & used it on a gig last weekend. I personally love it. Having used the venerable SM58 for years, the Nexadyne has a much reduced proximity effect. At the bottom of my vocal range, I tend to move in to the mic to increase volume. This mic seems to be much less boomy than the 58’s. I always love your reviews. Thanks You!

• 
  @DeltaWhiskeyBravo13579Ай бұрын

  Great review with a demo of low and high speaking and vocals. Excellent and thanks. I will have to look up the Sennheiser.

• 
  @user-oq9me5pb1pАй бұрын

  thank you my friend for all ....

• 
  @mattwiggans8512Ай бұрын

  I recently came across a very nice video you did some years ago regarding Grenson Footmasters (Exotic). Very enjoyable. Many thanks. It got me thinking. On the video you made comments regarding the use of a leather insole attached to the tongue rather than the bed of the shoe. I really liked this idea, and wondered if you had any recommendations regarding preferred insole/insert manufacturers. I’m very new to English made shoes, so if you could find a moment to respond, I would be very grateful. Great content! Thanks

• 
  @JayvonBeatzTVАй бұрын

  Thank you so much! Very grateful for your reviews (especially having a deep voice myself)

• 
  @rustycowbellАй бұрын

  Try the TC Electronic BodyRez pedal - its a Piezo pickup enhancer pedal.

• 
  @S.T.G.Ай бұрын

  So this unit can isolate the grounds of the two sides and, therefore, break up the ground loop and can also convert an unbalanced signal into a balanced one, which may also contribute to lower noise levels, especially, in case of a long cable run. However, unlike a typical di box, it won't attenuate the signal from line level to microphone level and won't perform an impedance conversion due to its 1:1 transmission ration (0 dB gain).

• 
  @AntonBrowneАй бұрын

  Well said. Shame I needed to get one but hey!

• 
  @richardichard4237Ай бұрын

  What sn annoying man you are. Can't quite put my finger on it....maybe the Chris Ewbanks type voice, slow, long annoying pauses....monosyllabic....not sure, but very annoying none the less. By the way the shoes are rejects due to the glaringly obvious folds that haven't been pulled out.

• 
  @porfiriolocascio4672Ай бұрын

  Hi, Anton, I've never gotten good live feedback from v7 (I have the standard version); I don't have the 945 but I have an Electrovoice ND96 which has a more unbalanced sound towards the medium-high frequencies, I think like the 945, with which I have a very good feeling on stage. Perhaps the v7 sounds flatter and more natural but the fundamental thing for a singer is to have good feedback, this helps to feel better and consequently to be more in tune and to sing with less effort. The ND96, which I recommend, is a great microphone in this respect and I also prefer it to the Beyerdynamic M88TG, which is part of my arsenal. It also depends on the context: perhaps acoustically or with music and low-noise environments, I would choose the other two but in general I always carry the ND96 with me, which helps me a lot, with stage monitors or in ear monitors. I use to sing with my lips on the microphone and in the low tones the ND 96 is never muddy

• 
  @aTouchoClassАй бұрын

  Doesn‘t the CP88 have XLR-outs anyway? Why the need for a DI? BTW congrats for your purchase, it‘s a really nice instrument! I had one for about a year but had to get rid of it eventually, didn’t quite fit my needs. No humming for me that I remember, though.

• 
  @AntonBrowneАй бұрын

  Thanks. Yes it does have XLR outs but I use the mono jack out. I am now very happy with it so far.

• 
  @aTouchoClassАй бұрын

  @@AntonBrowne Happy to hear that. And, looking forward to hear the CP88 in one of your hopefully soon to come singing & playing performance videos, featuring maybe the new Shure, if I may kindly suggest ;)

• 
  @TheWooTubes24 күн бұрын

  I'm an IT geek, so I was interested in your solution for a problem I don't have (yet.) Then KZread showed me this kzread.info/dash/bejne/oaWlusGKXabgYrA.htmlsi=q7Qxr2ydQF1fPwyz Is the Roland a modelling amp? There's quite a bit of discussion too.

• 
  @thisisyoutubehandleАй бұрын

  Brilliant comparison. I'm leaning towards SE V7 for my vocal recordings. I hear it's better, but I only wonder how one train their ear to the point that they can hear this type of poetic comparisons between two mics that to an untrained ear sound almost the same.

• 
  @AntonBrowneАй бұрын

  I would say just pay gentle attention to various areas; treble, bass, breath, clarity etc. It may take a while. If you're going to be recording, I would say the sE but please decide for yourself. Good luck.

• 
  @user-oq9me5pb1pАй бұрын

  the bose has phantom power ?i want to buy kms 104 for a cube street ex...i must buy phantom power?

• 
  @AntonBrowneАй бұрын

  The Bose Compact doesn't have phantom power (or reverb etc.) I'm using a TC Helicon effects box that provides phantom power. The Cube Street doesn't have phantom power either, so the KMS won't work. You may be better off with something like an sE V7 dynamic microphone for that scenario, or you could buy a battery-powered phantom power supply to power the KMS.

• 
  @user-oq9me5pb1pАй бұрын

  @@AntonBrowne i have a senhizer e 945...you know better ...if i buy kms 104 neumann ,i will see difference or is fall?all these for busking

• 
  @denekawaАй бұрын

  I love this man.. every few months I’ll randomly get back to this channel, lovely 👌🏼