You’ve got the most optimum glass collection..Awesome video brother.. it really helped

Enjoyed your review of the Sigma 14-24mm. I definitely will purchase this lens. I see opportunity in focal length that I did not think about before. Keep doing what you do!

Hi Tracy, thanks so much for your good work on this video. I'm thinking of adding real estate to my photography work, and I've been looking at this lens and the Tamron, and your review here is leading me to go with this lens. Thanks so much!

Love your style 👍🏻😁 & this is a proper lens review! Really digging that lens!

I recently got the tamron 17-28 and absolutely love it - having had the tamron 28-75 since it’s release I was so impressed I instantly pre ordered the tamron when it was available. Had that not been the case I would have been very interested in this lens - it’s great to see companies offering more affordable f2.8 glass for Sony that works so well with the autofocus! Sony’s G-master range is just far too expensive for me to justify!

Great review, I will be picking this lens up at some point!

Thank you for making this video. I think I am going to go with this over the Tamron for the same reasons as well.

Dang, I have the exactly gear lineup with you. In the market for wide-angle lens now. Will definitely consider it.

I send back Tamron 17-28mm as soon as I got the sigma 14-24mm, way sharper and better color and contrast. Love the lens, I even sold my Sony 12-24mm f4 haha. Nice video, you won't be disappointed, I use it for real estate, weddings photo video and even on a gimbal.

@Thumpr110

4 жыл бұрын

How does the sharpness compare to the 12-24? I plan on using one of these for real estate photography as well.

@aroubin

4 жыл бұрын

Also interested in your opinion of Sigma 14-24 f 2.8 vs Sony 12-24 f 4

@Chris-ey7zy

4 ай бұрын

Like my 12-24 Sony even if f4. Has focus breathing compensation

This was an amazing in depth testing of this lens. You def gained a sub. I am looking to purchase this lens and this video just really helped me feeling confident in getting it.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

UneekFoto Wow thank you!

@uneekfoto3264

4 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 I am getting my Sony for Christmas and this is the lens line up. Sigma 14-24 the new Sigma 24-70 and the Sigma 85mm all made for mirrorles. I was debating between the Smyang or Batis 85mm but I rather just keep it all sigma glass since I am coming from Nikon and the 18-35 Sigma art lens is just so amazing and sharp. I love that you did a video test with the 14-24 which helps a lot and also I will be doing real estate work so you also said it was great for that. Again your video was gold for me. Thanks again.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

UneekFoto Awesome! You won’t go wrong with Sigma glass!

Great review, thanks for sharing the video.

Relatable review. 10/10

Thank you for the in-depth video :)

nice review.. i just order the 14-24 because of your review.. thanks

I ordered this lense. Now waiting for it. I think it is coming today 😁 only wanted to use it for photography (landscape milky-way and architecture) but now I think I have to make more videos. Very good video searched for a video maker in German... Nothing good. So best test. Kept it simple.

This video is really helpful, thank you very much!!!

Thank you for your review. Please show us how you use this lens in wedding situations. Thx again!

Thanks for your review, looks like a winner to me! I have the 16-35 GM but I probably would have bought this if it was out a couple years ago instead. I would have loved the 14mm over the 16mm. Doesn't seem like much but it is for those moments you just don't have anymore room to back up, especially realestate.

hey respect for making the video dude

Thank you for making this video.

Definitely the next lens on my list. Currently using 24-70gm, 70-200gm.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Emjay Adams Then this should DEFINITELY be your next!

Great review! Thank you for this!

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

👍🏼🙏🏼

Hello from switzerland thx for the video help me a lot!!

After watching this I'll stick with the Tamron 17-28. Thanks for your review though

@FilippoMasoni

4 жыл бұрын

Same, mostly for weight and size and I can use filters. I already have a Samyang 14mm so if I need to go super wide I have that option

smart choice, Sigma Art glass is fantastic

Really well done review thank you! I currently have the Laowa15mm, no auto focus thinking about switching to this lens.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Lincoln Meikle I heard the laowa is a great lens, I just like having AF when I need it.

Hey Dan, thanks for this great video. Until you mentioned that the weight of the Canon version is different than the Sony version I didn't notice that they are using a different optical formula than each other and what I see from the MTF charts it seems that the Sony version is better than Sony 16-35 f/2.8 GM at the wide end where the Canon version was noticeably less sharp. That's great! Thank you for bringing this lens back in to my attention 😊👍

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Erkan Özgür Yılmaz You’re welcome! Thanks for watching!

yes it is available for the l-mount, which spans Leica, sigma, and Panasonic, the feedback is extremely useful for someone looking at switching from A Nikon DSLR to mirrorless. Though I am still considering my options (Nikon, Sony or Panasonic) the value proposition Sigma presents has me leaving Nikon for either Sony or Panasonic because Sigma has told me that both of the lenses I already own (85mm, 135mm both ART series) can be converted from f mount to either of the L or E mounts. I know there will be some small amount of loss in af speed, but being that neither of these focal lengths is really meant for sports that will be fine. This lens will be to the L-mount what the Tamron is to the sony. As to which is better Tracy is %100 correct it is all in what you use it for and who your equipment manufacturer is.

Great review! Thanks!

Thank you for the review. This is only the 2nd video I've seen of this lens (the other one was from a camera store that was also in Florida) I've ruled out the Tamron 17-28 as the images don't look as crispy as this lens. Now to determine if I want to drop the extra 700 bucks on the 16-35 Gmaster for that extra reach or get this lens and have that 2mm difference on the opposite end and save some money. I currently have the Tamron 28 - 75 and the Sony 85mm 1.8. I think I'd be happier with the 16-35 because of the extra reach and that 2mm doesn't seem like THAT big of a difference, but my wallet certainly says ouch to that choice! Decisions decisions.... Either way, thanks again for the video! Subed. =)

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Nathaniel Martin hey thanks! If you can swing the 16-35 do it!

I got this lens last week it's fantastic.

Great video!! Thank you, I think your fan overhead is grabbing the focus of your camera sometime..

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Albert Milton Thanks! No I had my focus point set too small, should’ve used wide.

@GODUNLIMITED

4 жыл бұрын

Tracy Daniel Davis makes sense! Glad I found your channel, subscribed, great 👍 channel with details! I’m having 24 mm 1.4 gm, 55 mm 1.8 and 85 mm 1.4 and primarily I do Christian videos and I also miss the range below 24 mm but this sigma looks promising! Hope soon we will get 14 or 16 mm prime 1.4

Dude, thanks very much!

Soooooooooooo helpful!!!!!!!!! Thank you!

Since I'm low on budget I use the 10-18 f/4 on A6400 and A7iii.

This is a great review!

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Kelly Lopez Thank you Kelly! Appreciate the comment.

great video. any update for the new sigma 24-70 for sony mount?

Thanks a lot Tracy!

Thank you for this review. I have been waiting for it.

Nice quick review!. It is now October, how has the lens performed for you? Still happy with it? Did you figure out the filter package? Thanks, Bob

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Hey Bob. Sorry for the super late response, see my newer videos for the ND filters! I still love this lens.

Great review....I really appreciate the time and effort it must take while doing your regular pro photography work to put together a video like this. The 14mm to 16mm switch views were helpful. My current situation is this: 11-year Nikon pro photographer, can't stand the constant oil spots on my Nikon D750 anymore, no point in going with another DSLR, Sony is way ahead of Nikon in mirrorless camera bodies and light years ahead in mirrorless specific lenses, so I pre-ordered the a7r iv. I do a lot of rural land real estate work and have been using the Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 SP (original) lens on the D750. In my research I was afraid of paying so much for the Sony 16-35mm and not even getting the same width as before, and the Tamron for Sony at 17mm not nearly wide enough. So I eventually found the Sigma, and pre-ordered it before watching your video. Your video though has cemented in my mind it was the right choice. You must have been lucky to get your lens as B&H, Adorama, Amazon, no one has it on September 3, 2019! Can't wait to get this lens out in the desert here in New Mexico and in the city too for interiors. The distortion seems very minimal to start with even at 14mm. Thanks again!

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Jason Collin Hey Jason! You won’t regret going to the A7R IV! I was tempted to get it myself but since I’m predominantly a videographer I’m holding out for the A7S III and will use the A7 III for photos. Yes, it seems like the supply for this lens is limited right now. I must have been in the first shipment phase! It’ll be worth the wait!

@JasonCollin

4 жыл бұрын

​@@TracyDavis904 Thanks Tracy . . . I actually canceled my backordered order from Adorama and today got the lens from Bedford Camera and Video with it already shipping out for Friday (two days from now) delivery. I could have already had it sitting on my desk if I didn't hold out waiting for Adorama so long. I have another question for you if you don't mind, I will need a second Sony camera as a backup to the a7R IV and for mounting a 70-200mm lens on when shooting events. I am considering the a6300 (as the newer models still use the same sensor!) or an a7 III. For the past 3 years I have had a Nikon full frame and crop sensor pair. I like that because then the 70-200mm becomes 300mm. However, maybe I can live without that and I should just have the benefit of having two full frame cameras? Likewise, having already spent a small fortune on the a7R IV and four Sony/Sigma lenses, I am thinking the Sony 70-200mm f/4 might be good enough if it is usable at ISO 6400 and up on either of the two Sony bodies I mentioned above and save a ton as Adorama has excellent rated used f/4 for only $999. Thanks for any thoughts you may have!

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Jason Collin I would stick with full frame even for a back up! And the 70-200 f/4 is a fantastic lens, you won’t go wrong with it!

@JasonCollin

4 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 Thank you! I appreciate the advice! I'm a subscriber now too!

Great review. That background music sounds great. World work amazing for focussing at work. Mind sharing the title?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Hassan Syed it’s a licensed song from soundstripe, sorry.

Good video man, appreciate it. I may go with this lens instead

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Awesome! Let me know if you do! It's such a great lens.

Awesome video! It was very helpful. I already own the 12-24 G and just put out a review on the Tamron 17-28 (which I love). So it is hard to justify adding this Sigma 14-24 but it is very tempting. I got to test one out in my local camera store and it is a tank of a lens! So heavy but i'm sure the image quality is superb. Have to give it some more thought ;)

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

You must have tested the Canon/Nikon version which is much heavier. This one is really a good weight!

@Tarkinx

4 жыл бұрын

You don't like your 12-24 G ?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Tarkinx I believe that’s an APS-C lens so it will be cropped.

@azvisuals

4 жыл бұрын

@@Tarkinx No, I love my 12-24! It is full frame and I mostly use it around 12-18mm. I much prefer the 2.8 at 24mm. So I am keeping both the 12-24 G and Tamron 17-28 for now. This sigma might change that though, but I will need to wait for more reviews.

@Tarkinx

4 жыл бұрын

Alex Zhang ok thank you for your answer

Loved this! Subbed

@TracyDavis904

3 жыл бұрын

Yay! Thank you!

Hey, @TracyDanielDavis I think this lens had the function to utilize lens correction if I'm not mistaken. Inside the camera, menus should be an option to correct for things like the "bowing" or aberration among other things. Let me know if you found your way to that and if it fixes that for you. If so I think this would be a great lens addition for those who need the wide aspect it offers. Thanks! and keep up the great videos because you have a great flow and personality along with very good video production.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

jonathan jenkins Wow! Hey man thank you for the kind words! I want to make more for sure, it’s finding the time that’s tough!

Solid video! Looking forward to getting this lens.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks! New one on this lens coming today regarding using it on a gimbal!

Thanks for this and good job.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

HoopDogg80 Thank you man!

Are you comfortable using it for video without a filter? Is it usable in bright daylight stopped down? The specs say it takes a rear gel filter. Would love to hear how well that works. Thanks for the video.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Ibsly Iknowuknow New video coming out tomorrow where I talk about that! Stay tuned!

Already have the 16-35GM and it's my main workhorse for real estate. Really interested in the tamron but it's not wide enough. This lens is super tempting but hard to justify going from the beastGM to the sigma. If I didnt already have the GM I would buy this no question

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

HD EDITS Yea I think you’re good if you have the 16-35. Solid lens!

@Tarkinx

4 жыл бұрын

HD EDITS why not the 12-24 from Sony ?

@royzarga8407

4 жыл бұрын

@@TarkinxTarkinx because it's f4 and it's not good enough for indoors.

Thank you for the video Tracy! If you happen to figure out how to use the rear back filter, let us know!

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Thibault Klein Will do!

@jessefilmic

4 жыл бұрын

​@@TracyDavis904 I bought some gelatin filters - ask any lighting store that sells gelatin sheets (Lee are typically what filmmakers use. they range from 0.3 to 0.9 and even more!) the black cutout is provided and I use a scalpel or scissors to use it. gelatin scratches easy and retains fingerprints too so handle the tabs at the end!.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

jessetides I thought of that too, I’m just curious what Sigma will offer.

Is it a heavy lens? I have a Sony a7iii and I use the sigma 20mm 1.4 lens as my vlog lens and its really heavy!

Thanks for the great video Tracy. How is the autofocus for stills with this lens? I have had issues with Sigma autofocus in the past.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

david miller Thanks! Were you using the lens adaptive or native? It’s really solid AF on this one!

@ponderingnugget

4 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 Native on a canon system. I'm glad to hear this one works well on the Sony mirrorless system, I'm doing some research thinking I might pick it up for my a7riii. Now if I could just find it in stock somewhere...

Very Very helpful. Thanks a lot. 🙏🏼

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Nicklas Askling glad to help!

Hi Daniel, can you compare this to the Sigma 14mm F1.8 Prime lens for Sony

Good stuff 👍🏾

AF seems so soo much better on this than the first sigma Sony lenses.. I mean, its not fast! But its smooth

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

twinkmaster2 I had my settings to be pretty smooth.

There's a lot of vignetting. Do you know if that can be corrected with a profile in-camera? Thanks for the review!

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Greg Makami Hi Greg, I’m not seeing the vignetting. What time code do you notice it?

Nice review. I take it the focus does not have hard stops? I'm looking for a Wide Angle lens with hard stops to use with our wireless follow-focus. I'd love to have it geared already but I can get that added later if necessary and, of course, we don't want to spend $5,000+ on cinema lens.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

David Stanton Nope! If you don’t mind a manual focus lens look at the Rokinon cine lenses, pretty affordable but you might need to adapt them to Sony using the Sigma MC-11.

Hey nice review. I realize this was posted a while ago but any second thoughts after living with this lens? Have you checked out the Sigma 16 to 28 2.8 Contemporary for comparison?

@TracyDavis904

Жыл бұрын

I still love it!

Will mark 2 of Sony 12-24mm F4 release soon? If I want to pair an ultrawide lens with expectation of a bit of crop to use as everyday lens to the A7RV 723g with Tamron 50-400mm F4.5-6.3 1155g, should I get Loawa 10-18mm F4.5-5.6 manual lens 496g, Sony 12-24mm F4 565g or Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 795g?

these new technology of lenses are great im still stuck with my 14-24 f2.8 nikkor lens

This lens is incredible for the money. It is amazing for landscape/astro photography

It is available in Sigma's own SA mount for their own mirrorless cameras such as the SD Quattro H.

i was considering this lens a few weeks back before my tamron arrived. every review i see... just makes me want to buy the GM :(

Thanks buddy 👍🏻🤗

Watching from Kenya.

8.30.2019: Truly appreciate all of the likes and comments. I'm glad there's a lot of curiosity out there for this lens! Appreciate all of you. I hope this helped you! What wide angle lens are you using for your Sony cameras? Also, I did add some photos at the end. Although not great I think they show the lens is a solid choice but I will shoot some more dynamic images soon.

@MJAdams-js7np

4 жыл бұрын

Tracy Daniel Davis yes, you’re correct, first sigma zoom. Helpful video!

Hello Great review. I want to pair this with my Sony apsc mirrorless body. Will I loose a lot of wide angle? Or will still feel wide enough to enjoy the wide?

@KetansaCreatesArt

4 жыл бұрын

Another question would be- Is it worth over Sigma primes (except the aperture difference) ?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Depends on which camera you have, but you will lose some of the range. If I were you I would look at the Sony 12 to 24 lens.

@KetansaCreatesArt

4 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 Thank you so much for reply. I am actually collecting wide apperture Full Frame lenses (right now for my a6500) preparing for FF body in future.

Only thing optically I didn't care for is all the purple fringing in the trees. Overall seems like a nice lens. I already own the Tamron 17-28mm and 28-75mm though

Hey great video. Before I make a super big purchase I'm a photographer/videographer as well for weddings. Now u say this would be great for wedding videos? If not I was thinking the 24 GM instead.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Melda Jean Photography No, I would never use this for a wedding. Wide angle lenses are not flattering to the human body at closer distances, i use the 24 to 70 or 50 mm on wedding days.

@meldajeanphotographyfilm1767

4 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 U mean for video? I'm needing one for video right now.

Did you color grade the video at the autofocus test?

Luv the lens. Now, which music is it in the background...

Great real life review. It's terrible how hot it is here in Florida lol 😂

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Randy Reed Over it! Ha

Yo! Been waiting for someone to review this thing! Thinking of doing one myself. For some reason your video doesn’t pop up when I search “sigma 14-24” and search by upload date though! Just a heads up if you maybe want to change your tags or something!

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Justin J Morris Thanks and I know! I do have that tagged! So weird.

Weil done Review! Thanks

How is the vignetting and coma at 14mm? when compared to the Samyang/Rokinon 14mm F2.8

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Antoni Hjalmarsson A lot better!

Thanks!

Thanks for checking it out. So what about ND filters?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Like I showed in the video, I’m not sure yet on where they go within the mount area.

@GaryJahman

4 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 sorry man, must have missed that part. Have fun using this beast!

Nicely done. PS Florida heat sucks all year round...I’m based in Tampa 😎

Hi, could tell me what tripod do you use for this kind of heavy wide lens?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Eximuse The lens isn’t that heavy honestly, but I use the Benro carbon fiber one! Sorry I don’t have the model.

I have a Tamron 17-28mm and a laowa 12mm f2,8 zero D . How is this lens compare to the others ones?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Quen DAMAND Send them to me and I’ll put them side by side! :)

At 4:50 the entire scene looks smudgy, just as if you have some kind of fat or smudge on the lens, did you accidentally touch the glass?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Eivind Brækkan Engstad good catch! Just fog from going from a 72 degree house to 90 degrees outside.

Haida makes a set of NDs @ B&H Ps Hows the lens been? I ordered one today!

I've been trying to decide between this or the Tamron 17-28mm 2.8 or 16-35mm f4

@RahulVanganicreations

4 жыл бұрын

Tamron is the best bang for the buck, unless you need those extra 3mm. Also, Tamron is much lighter so it will always find it's way into my bag!

Sigma 35 1.2 has a linear focus... So even though it's focus by wire you can do repeatable focus pulls with it. Is the 14-24 also linear focus?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

I need to understand what you mean more, sorry for my ignorance! How can I tell?

@micahturner5599

4 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 Most autofocus lenses don't have hard stops. And they do have a feature where the focus speed depends on how fast you turn the ring. This makes using a follow focus system with an autofocus lens pretty much impossible. Some of Sony's new lenses (135gm, 24gm I think) and sigma's 35 1.2 have a linear focus so it behaves more like a true manual lens. For example, a quarter turn with a linear focus lens or a manual focus lens will always have the same change in focus. With most autofocus lenses, a quarter turn will not be the same, and instead the focus will change depending on how fast or slow it is turned. I'm wondering if the new sigma 14-24 has the linear focus option. The easiest way to check this is probably just turn the focus ring. If it has hard stops, it's likely a linear focus lens. If you can just endlessly turn the ring, it's the other design.

@royzarga8407

4 жыл бұрын

12-24 is the same as 35 1.2. you can do focus pills as well.

@micahturner5599

4 жыл бұрын

@@royzarga8407 thanks!

What camera did you used for this video? You were more out of focus than in focus? just wondering . Thanks.

@TracyDavis904

Жыл бұрын

I was in focus the entire video except when I was testing the lens or showing the lens. It was the a7iii back at this time.

@andreiiasi

Жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 Maybe you should check again you're entire video. You were quite a few times out of focus and got me worried.

how is the distortion at 14mm? is it obvious? I got tamron hands on but is fairly obvious distorted at 17mm..

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

KH CHOI You can tell it’s somewhat distorted, but not too bad. If you are shooting too high or too low the distortion is more noticeable so shooting level-on will be the best.

You need to buy ND gels and use the included template to cut them out.

Nice video,

This lens or the 17 28 tamron 2.8 ?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

I haven't held the Tamron, but it does look more on the cheap/kit lens side to me. Meaning the lens itself not its visual quality. If 17-28 is a good range for you, I'm sure it's solid. But seeing how well this Sigma handles barrel distortion at 14mm I'm very happy with my purchase.

is sigma 14-24 2.8 art is fine to use with gimbals or not setup is a7iii + crane 2 + this lens planning to buy this lens

@TracyDavis904

3 жыл бұрын

10000%. Fantastic lens for a gimbal.

@NocsTV

3 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 thank you for the answer :) im just worry about the ring lock of the camera might break because its heavy lens :)

How heavy is it? I will prob use it on gimbal only

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Ron Flores I’d have to check, but it seems lighter than the 24-70 2.8 GM. I’ll do a video using it on the Ronin S!

Such a great lens, but i dont know if i should buy this sigma or the sigma 14mm 1.8... i jsut want to do astro photography with it, i got a canon 17-40mm at home and the sony 24-105 ..

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Machmut Doener if you just need it for Astro photos the 14mm will serve you well. If you need to zoom for varying situations this lens is the way to go.

@machmutdoener

4 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 Yeah, i was wondering if the 14mm 1.8 with ef mount, has the same problems as the sigma 14-24 2.8 with ef mount, because i am considering getting the ef mount version

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

@@machmutdoener Not sure! Try renting it first.

@lordofming

4 жыл бұрын

@@machmutdoener I am also wondering for astrophot ... I only have the zeiss f4 and the samyang rubbish 14mm. I am looking for somethign much better, I have been thinking of 24mm GM but not sure if I can justify the price to my wife ;p I do mainly aurora and astrophoto

@machmutdoener

4 жыл бұрын

@@lordofming I guess 24 is not wide enough for aurora

Nice lens

What would be your decision between the Sigma 14-24 and the Sony 16-35GM, if the Price doesn‘t matter? Greets from Germany😊✌🏻

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Thomas Hollinger I would have to say the 16-35 GM. Being able to go to 35mm is far better than being able to get down to 14mm in my opinion.

@THo-yl8pl

4 жыл бұрын

THX😊 What about the Image quality at 16,20,24mm?

Where did you get your knife from?

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

It’s a benchmade!

Why did you pick this one over the Sony 12-24mm f/4? Because the price or the f/2.8 or both? I rented the Sony one for interior photography and it's really, really sharp. Don't know the video AF performance, but I'm guessing it's really good too, almost all native Sony lenses have fast AF. While 12mm vs 14mm might not sound like much, it's still about 17%, which means you'll capture a lot more of the scene.

@TracyDavis904

4 жыл бұрын

Ervin The 12-24 is an APS-C lens, so you’ll lose about 50% of quality by putting it on a full frame camera.

@Ervin-1190

4 жыл бұрын

@@TracyDavis904 It's not mate, it's full frame. Check it out: kenrockwell.com/sony/lenses/12-24mm.htm

Excellent review my friend - this is definitely my next lens.

very good video

@TracyDavis904

3 жыл бұрын

GGs Japan Thank you!