Which lens would you get and why?

@TheOxleys

4 жыл бұрын

Dunna Did It where were you a week ago? I just picked up the 16-35 f/4...

@PerEinarL

4 жыл бұрын

None🤪 I got a Nikon body😂 in Nikon, I probably would have had the 16-35 f-4😉 It’s some kind of mix between the zeiss and Sony gm in this video. Like the high quality of the gm but with the apurture of the zeiss.

@firephoenix2145

4 жыл бұрын

I would buy the tamron because i dont have more money than that

@Zakna

4 жыл бұрын

already picked up the tamron

@joealfanophotography9568

4 жыл бұрын

Had the Zeiss and the Tamron, kept the Tamron and traded the Zeiss and got the Sigma. Keeping the Tamron for travel and using the Sigma for real estate photography.

Ahhhh December, a perfect video to watch with no money. 😂

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Lol don’t worry, you aren’t alone.

@roniaditya8352

4 жыл бұрын

Yes I'm with you brother. I can feel you. I'm broke. Help me anyone

@Tanjohncarlo

4 жыл бұрын

Damn

@Perro_salvaje_

3 жыл бұрын

@@roniaditya8352 hahahaha sorry to hear that

Dude awesome video!! Been using the Tamron 17-28 and just love it. Definitely don't need anything besides that and my 24-70. Stoked you're on the Artlist train as well. I love that I can use the tunes for commercial work with no issues. Huge lifesaver.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah that range pretty much has you covered!!

I literally watched about 10 videos yesterday on these lenses and was wishing I could have found a video comparing them all. Perfect timing. Great info! I’m a professional photographer and filmmaker, and I’ll probably go with the tamron to see how it does. I would rather spend the saved money on other production costs if possible. Thanks for the great video! 🤙🏻

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

I'm glad to hear my timing was good Justin! Thanks for watching and I'm happy it was valuable for you!

@nicholassmith7723

4 жыл бұрын

It's great. If the focal range works for you then you won't regret getting the Tamron

Solid video. In the market for one of these and this helped alot. Thanks!

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

That’s great to hear Taylor! Cheers!

I have been super happy with my Tamron 17-28mm. I love the 2.8 it matches perfectly with my Tamron 28-75mm. The price is right the quality is just surprisingly good. Like you said I really like how small it is and its the perfect gimbal lens since the zoom is internal. I used it on a gimbal for client work this past weekend and wow it was so nice to make those changes without re-balancing. Can't say enough good things about it. Thanks!

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

That’s awesome Paul! I’ve been loving it too! Just so nice and small. And the value can’t be beat!

@andrewpowell815

3 жыл бұрын

Do you ever miss the OSS?

Yes, comparison I wanted to see all this time long! Thanks brother

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching!

This makes me want to upgrade my 16-35 to the 2.8 G-Master, I tossed the f4 on my A7R and was really missing the extra stop for interior photography! Great comparison D!

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah I totally hear you. It seems to always be right on that line too where f4 is so close but f2.8 is perfect to not have to push your iso too far. And 16-35 really is a sweet range. I do like that Tamron a lot (especially for the price) but that little bit of extra range on the GM is sweet.

@BeckiandChris

4 жыл бұрын

Dunna Did It yeah the Tamron seemed to preform really well, the weight of that is pretty appealing!

This is there best comparison video I've seen... Thanks for your feedback, you've definitely helped me make a decision on which lens to get! 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

That’s great to hear!!

Thank you! this is what I needed. I think Ill go with the Tamron

Great comprehensive video bro 👍🏻

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks a ton!

I have the Sony/Zeiss 16-35 f/4. When I bought it, my choices were either it or the 2.8 GM. For wide angle, I shoot mainly landscapes so I did not, at the time think that the extra that the 2.8GM cost was worth it. In light of the 2 other lenses in this video (or 3 if you also consider the newly released 12-24 f/2.8 GM) would you recommend keeping the 16-35 f/4, or upgrading to one of the other lenses. (Are the other lenses SO MUCH BETTER than the Zeiss that I would be better off upgrading from my existing lens?)

Whatever sony lens you're looking for, Dunna has a video and a comparison about it. Thanks so much man

Just when I thought I was going to have to start looking up reviews on all these bam, I find another great video! Can't wait for the peak design bag to come in great reviews brotha!

Nice review dude - very helpful. Im still on the quest for a decent wide for the a6500 the 10-18 f4 still seems the only option and not great vs the 16mm sigma which is non zoom so not very practical day to day. Anyhow, thats my challenge. This video will be re-watched when I upgrade to Full Frame :)

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah there really isn’t much available for apsc in the ultra wide zoom range.

Great video man! And i got that same yeti mug ;) Keep up the awesome work dude!

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks dude! I absolutely love that mug!

@JHawk

4 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit Same! Great minds think alike haha

Hello Dunna! there is another video. What i can say is I love watching your videos.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much! I appreciate it!

Thanks for another great video . . . you made some very honest and valid points pro and con for each lens and I appreciate that. I'm gonna take the 'buy once cry once' approach and pull the trigger on the 16-35 Gmaster . . . here's why for 'Me' and thanks to You. #1 The Tamron with the zoom/focus rings being opposite of my other lenses will drive me nuts. #2. You mentioned slight 'Focus Hunting' . . . this will be my primary 'low light' lens, where all lenses struggle the most, I want the best I can get in those tough conditions, that's the reason I'm buying this focal range / aperture. #3. Focal Range . . . 16mm-35mm is the greatest range of 3/4 of these of these lenses, making it overall much more versatile for me. This will round-out my kit which will be Sony 16-35GM . . . Sony 24-105G . . . and Sony 100-400 GM. Perhaps down the road I'll pick up a dedicated portrait lens . . . but I don't shoot portraits now, so it's not needed. Thanks again for painting a broad general picture, some people want technical specs which is fine. . . . but all 4 of these lenses are great, you just need to pick the one that works best for your particular needs. Cheers!

Love yor videos :) i have a Question please, i like the tamron 17-28, wold you recomend it for astro photography thanks

Awesome video! Thanks for the great comparison. I‘ll get my Tamron 17-28 tomorrow! As I hike a lot with my camera and I love lightweight for filming - so I think this works best for me, although I AM a professional photographer 😊

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks! Yeah I totally think that's going to be the right choice for a lot of people, even pro photographers! Its just really a great value lens!

This review was super helpful!! Gonna end up choosing the Tampon, super excited to get it!! :D

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

Glad it helped... oh autocorrect haha

@davidvazquez8225

3 жыл бұрын

Dunna Did It wow how embarrassing, I’m gonna keep it just for shits and giggles haha

@tfm2934

3 жыл бұрын

Sounds painful

Great video - nice job

@dunnadidit

Жыл бұрын

Thanks!

You crushed this video!! Great job

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much!

Just found your YT channel yesterday and loving all your content. As a Sony E user, i'm loving your suggestions and tips.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much!

I'm just getting into photography. I have a Sony mirrorless camera. And I just bought a Sigma 24-70mm lens. I'd like a wider lens also. The Tamron is 17-28mm. How much wider is 17 than the Sigma 24? Is it noticeably wider? I feel like 24 is already relatively wide. I want a wider lens for landscape photography. I don't want to buy two lenses if 24 is already wide enough. Thanks.

It's like you know me, or at least my shopping history lately. :-D Thank you so much for the in-depth videos. They help me, but certainly not my wallet.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Haha! I promise I'm not tracking your history ;) Thanks for watching and sorry about your wallet!

Hey Dunn’s, I have Sony A6500 I shoot weddings and street portraiture, my set up is Sigma 16 1.4 Sigma 30 1.4 and Sony G 18-105 F4 do you think I should just sell or upgrade to full frame or is their any other lens you recommend for my collection in regards to event and wedding photography.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

I highly recommend the new 16-55 f2.8 for apsc. Its a killer lens!

really helpfully video!!! best review video ever

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks a ton!

Nice video. I shoot interiors professionally and disagree that you would want the 14mm for that purpose. Even a well corrected lens will have mountains of perspective distortion (near objects get stretched) at that focal length. Even small bathrooms are better shot tighter and stitched. I tend to stick (on full frame) with 18mm and above, and love when I can shoot a whole property at 24mm. Having said all that, I currently use mainly the 16-35GM, Batis 18mm, Canon 24mm tilt shift and/or the 24mm GM. I'm building a kit out for another photographer I just hired and don't really want to pay for another 16-35 GM (though I agree that it is the all around best)...the Tamron looks like a great deal, all things considered.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Great points! Thanks for sharing!

thanks man, i am ordering the tamron today, i feel it has a good place in my quiver

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Nice!

My only complaint with the Sony 16-35 F4 is that when you use it for static talking-to-the-camera style shots with autofocus, the background keeps "vibrating" as if the camera is constantly focus hunting. You don't get that smooth bokeh as a result, it's distracting

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I think that has to do with focus breathing maybe. Those little micro adjustments when it tracks your small movements seem to affect the background (specifically small light sources) worse.

@raduantoniu

3 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit exactly

@raduantoniu

3 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit exactly

@louiedc8703

3 жыл бұрын

this happens when your AF drive speed is on "fast". This needs to be adjusted accordingly.

@raduantoniu

3 жыл бұрын

@@louiedc8703 hey I didn't know that. Thanks!

I felt the same way about the 16-35 GM. Sold it to go w/ the Tamron 17-28 and get $1000 back. I may get another 16-35 GM eventually, but I may want to get something with a bit more character. The Sony lenses all seem really clinical, with very little flare. But, they're pretty dang sharp, and the in camera correction is spot on for video.

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah I still haven’t actually let go of the f4 tbh. There’s something about it that makes me hold on. Even though it’s f4, I really like that little bit of extra reach and the quality is just nice.

Nice selection of lenses! I shoot a lot of astro so the Sigma 14-24 was the best overall choice. If I wasn't doing astro quite so seriously I'd have gone for the 16-35 GM; it's such a useful focal range that I think it'd soon justify the higher price tag vs the Tamron. All look great though!

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah I bet that 14-24 is a killer lens for Astro!

@Pisanche

3 жыл бұрын

As I’m really struggling between these two - why do you like the Sigma better for astro?? Is it just the wider angle? I’d think the GM would be sharper and with better focus 🤔

@timwhite1111

3 жыл бұрын

@@Pisanche I'd had a 16-35 previously and 16mm always felt a bit restrictive for coastal milky way landscapes. Aside from that, the 16-35 GM isn't necessarily sharper; the Sigma 14-24 is staggeringly good. AF will likely be a bit better on the GM, but for astro that's irrelevant anyway. Both great lenses, but even if they were the same price, I'd still pick the Sigma.

@timwhite1111

3 жыл бұрын

@@Pisanche Although having said all that, the new 12-24 GM looks like it's superb, both generally and for astro... I've not tried one personally though.

Just bought the Tamron... Waiting for it to be delivered. Already have the 28-75 so it seemed logical. Both together STILL cost less than the 16-35GM. So 17-75 seems better bang for buck to me!! Will be geting the 70-180 if thats as good too!!

Just a question, would you say the Tamron is good enough glass to put it on an a7r4? also, how does the distortion handle on the Tamron?

Hey man appreciate everything you share about sony can you do a video explaining the difference of art lens and contemporary and lens that are good like sharpness and bokeh

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Hey! Thanks for watching! Generally the ART series is their top line, contemporary is technically below that but the quality is still pretty insane. Especially for the price you pay.

I am actually a fan of Tamrons zoom/focus ring configuration. Although not conventional, having the focus ring closer to the body helps with stability during handheld rack focusing during video.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Well there you go!

I ended up with a used zeiss simply because it was 900, the tamron is my second choice because of the 2.8 however with heavy use the tamron develops slop in the adjustment and by simply holding the lens upside down it will extend, also noticed it to be quite noisy whereas I have no noise being picked up on mic with the zeiss.

Hey Dunna, I shoot Parkour video for my local community and was looking into the 16-35 F4 Zeiss since it has OSS. Would you use this lens for action sports or action sequences ? I would like to pair the lens with an a7iii, what do you think ? Thanks in advance!

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

I think it would be a great choice! It's got fast focusing, OSS, and f4 is probably good for that kind of thing so that you keep things in focus.

I'm a fairly new shooter with an a6400, the Sigma trio, and an 18-105 f4 (all purchased based on your recommendations) I'm loving this combo. I primarily shoot pics and very little video. I'll be shooting portraits, gymnastics in poorly lit gyms, and real estate interiors. I'm about to pull the trigger on an A7iii and plan to get the Sony 85 1.8 and the Sigma 14-24mm 2.8. I want to up my real estate photography and try some landscape and astro. Anyhow, love your channel, very inspirational and informative.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

That’s awesome Doug!! Thanks so much for watching!!

How do the extending zoom lenses perform on a gimbal? Do you need to re-calibrate or does the gimbal make up for the weight change?

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Depends on the gimbal. Most of the newer gimbals are getting so strong that it probably wouldn’t matter much. And even with the internal zoom lenses, there are still things shifting around so it would still affect it a little bit. I never rebalance though. Just balance with it at the halfway point.

Hey Dunna, awesome vid! Almost rattled by indecision but will survive...thanks!

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

Haha well I hope that this helped a little bit

Thank you for this man. Your videos are genuinely a joy to watch. If I have the money at the time, I'm going with the GM. If I don't have enough, I'm going Tamron!

@joshmoxeyarchives

3 жыл бұрын

For talking head videos and podcasts, do you think 28mm can pass? Or is 35mm (like you've said you use) that important for less face distortion?

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

My pleasure!!

Hi! Which is the best combo for A6500 do you think? Sigma 16mm and 30mm f1.4 (already owned) or Tamron 17-28 f2.8..... there is always the possibility of buying an A7 series in the future but the apsc is going to stay with me...

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

That’s tough. Probably the sigmas. But the new Sony 16-55 f2.8 is amazing.

if money wasn't a restriction, that sony 16-35 gmaster is too SICK of a lens

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Totally!

Big ups for the Artlist sponsorship man! Personally like the Sigma quality the most through these ones!

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks dude! Yeah it’s pretty solid! Love that ART series!

@Creative7inc

4 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit Honestly man!

Dunna Did it again🔥

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

Any reason you went with 16-35 rather than 10-18 for the a6400? I know this is an fe lens comparison but I’m thinking of going more a6400 rather than a7iii

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Mostly because I was pretty sure I was going to eventually go FF. But also, at the time, I wasn’t a huge fan of ultra wide like that... since then, I have changed my stance haha.

@tfm2934

3 жыл бұрын

The 10-18 was glued to my camera when I used APS-C. Awesome little lens!

Shooting on an A7S (so you can Kramer up the ISO) it’s also without stabilisation.. which would you recommend?

Thank you for a nice and informativ video about the wide zooms for Sony. I have been looking to Tamrons 17-28 and Sigmas 14-24 for a while, but have decided to drop the wide zoom. Instead I have Samyangs 18mm 2.8 and the Sony 28mm 2.0 and the next lense I buy is the Samyang 35mm 1.4. If I need to zoom I just put on my Sony 24-105mm 4.0 - the same goes for my aps-c where I also goes with the Sigma series of fast primes and if I need to zoom I use the Sony 18-105mm f 4.0 when I find the money to buy that lense.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Nice! Thanks for sharing!

I was debating between all these lenses and ended up with a Sony 20mm f1.8 G. It's a great landscape lens that's light and almost as wide as the Tamron. Optics are fantastic and likely sharper than any of these lenses. If I want narrower framing, I crop later. It's also the same price as the cheapest lens here, the Tamron. The differences between all these focal lengths isn't huge and walking a bit can go a long way.

I want that Sigma 14-24

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Get it! You’re sigma obsessed lol

@twoscoops2

4 жыл бұрын

I ordered it today, KZread must know and recommended this video lol

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Hahaha! (they're watching us)

Dunna: "Go for Sigma if you really need to go as wide as possible!" Sony 12-24mm: "Hold my beer"

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Lol 😂

I just ordered the tammy which I'm gonna go pick up today so watching this helps confirming I made a good choice :P

I bought the Tamron(for my aps-c camera (a6300) and it's the most expensive lens I've bought in my life so far. I was afraid it wouldn't fit well with my setup, but it looks amazingly good, still wide enough, accurate AF, the performance in low light is not bad. One of my best investments.

I got the Tamron on release and don't regret it. 17mm is plenty wide for me and 28mm is usually just enough on the tele end. For the price difference you can pick up the 28-75mm and still have some money to put towards the Sony 85mm 1.8 (all of which have a 67mm filter thread).

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Amen.

The choice depends on what other zooms you have. 17-28 is a good complement to 28-75 or 24-70. Whereas 16-35 complements 70-200 or 50/85 prime. 14-24 is a specialty lens. GM or Zeiss costs less if bought used.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Great points!

@pinikpikantv3555

4 жыл бұрын

16 35 F4, 55 mm zeiss, 85 mm probably for me. But tamron 17 28 is cheaper and has also great review.

@tfm2934

3 жыл бұрын

Everything costs less if bought used. Except for Jennifer Lawrence's knickers (a friend told me).

On which lens this video is shoot?

I really like the colors in this video what profile do you use, if you don't mind what light. Thanksss

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

I was using an aputure 120dii with the light dome ii (links for my gear are in the description) and I believe I shot this one in HLG2.

@MelvinDlaCruz

4 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit thank bro

@MelvinDlaCruz

4 жыл бұрын

Do you overexposed?

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Maybe a little bit.

Thanks! Just wondering why the Sony 10-18mm F4 (SEL1018) doesn't feature as part of wide angle lens comparison videos? I was looking into vlog lenses, would the 10-18 f4 be better than the Tamron 17-28? It also has OSS! Or is getting both overkill? Then again I am using it on a A6600... thoughts please?

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

Hey! For this video I was just going for full frame lenses. People love the 10-18 as an apsc option though!

@itsdannyftw

3 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit Thanks Dunna!

I liked this review 👌🏻

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

That’s great to hear!

I'm leaning towards the 16-35mm f4 used from eBay because of the OSS... it sells for around $800 pre-owned, so I would definitely buy a used version. I'm shooting with the A7SIII for video so I'm not too worried about needing f2.8. That said, I haven't taken the plunge yet... my second thought would be the Tamron because it is a little lighter and am wondering if the 3-4 oz would make a big difference on a gimbal?

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

The weight does definitely make a difference but I do find myself really appreciating the difference in that little bit of extra focal length with a 16-35.

@DrSidewayZ

2 жыл бұрын

I’m on the a7siii also and I’m running the zeiss, the tamron is definitely cheaper but with time if you’re racking a lot the adjustment in the tamron becomes loose and by simply holding upside down the lens will extended on its own weight

which one has the least focus breathing? I want to do focus stacking. thanks

Is the warping thing in Sigma also happening at the 24mm end?

For me personally I know that the Tamron is the way to go especially since I already have a Sony 35mm prime but that G master is so sexy. Maybe I can convince my landlord to let me slide on rent this month 🤔

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Haha wouldn’t that be nice!

from an APS-C guy, I'd say you should recomment the Sony 16-55 2.8 over that Ziess one. Price is close enough but you get better stats for the specific APS-C camera. Good video sir

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

100%!! The 16-55 is now my go-to recommendation for apsc users! Especially for a6500/6600 users with ibis.

Hello, I own no camera till date but I am in planning to buy sony a7iii and bmpcc 6k cameras. For a7iii, I planned sigma 24-70mm dg dn f/2.8 sony e-mount and sigma 85mm 1.4 dg art sony e-mount and for bmpcc 6k, I planned sigma 18-35mm dc art. My question is for sony a7iii, should I go for sigma (sony) e-mount lenses or sigma (canon)ef mount lenses with mc11 adaptor for future purposes and for bmpcc 6k camera as well. Kindly solve my problem. Note - I do not own any canon dslr. Thanks

10:00 I heard in a video that the distortion comp feature in sony cameras can do that.. try it with that feature off... maybe it will stop

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah that seems to be what’s causing it. I know sigma has been trying to fix that in certain lenses with firmware

tamron and zeiss are same priced in my country:) what do you suggest ?

why no Sony FE 12-24mm f/4 G in your comparison? Thanks for the video!

Hello Dunna, I've just got an A7R4 ( I know,,,,too much camera for me,,but anyway), I've seen a lot of people saying that the Zeiss its more than enough if you will be using it only during the day. But on the other side, I've read some articles saying that because of the amount of pixels the A7R4 has, it makes this lens even worst. what do you think? thank you very much, I really like all your videos.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

The A7Riv is a killer camera! That’s awesome! I’m pretty sure the zeiss would be great, I haven’t heard anything about it not being able to resolve for higher megapixel cameras.

@gerardolenin

4 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit Thank you very much, your videos are amazing, something made me decide for this lens is that even if its true that retail price for the Zeiss is 1300 dls or so, but because its been for long time on the market you can find it a lot cheaper, I've got it for an equivalent to 600 dls, which I think its a very good price, and since I have the 24mm 1.4 GM ( that is amazing!!) I didn't want to go a 2.8 lens cuz I felt it will make a little bit redundant my prime lens.

My understanding is Sigma 14-24 will work best for my environmental indoor portraits? Great video!! Bx

Just got an a7iii on black friday with a kit lens. With my weebil lab combo the tamron seems the best fit for me. and i bought an a7iii so the cheaper lens seems like a good call

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

NICE! That’s gonna be a great kit!

I have a canon 17-55 f2.8 that I'm trying to replace when I get a FF camera. I'm wanting something with the same focal length, reading that "should" be a 28-86mm f3.5 but there really isnt one, so I'm going with a 28-200mm f2.8-5.6 tamron...I fear that its not going to be wide enough.

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

Do you know which FF camera you’re getting?

@HalfInsaneOutdoorGuy

3 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit a7s3 =)

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

I highly recommend the sigma 24-70 then! I recently did a video about why it’s my go to “all-around er”

@HalfInsaneOutdoorGuy

3 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit is it silent when focusing/aperture adjusting? will i be able to film in dim fire light?

can i use the zeiss 16-35 FE e-mount on a aps-c e mount sony or the immagine will be croped (i see a forum who said nothing happens, but I want to be sure)

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

You can! It will crop in and look more like a 24-52.5mm

@giuliocurti8679

4 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit still remain a little wide-angle?

@tfm2934

3 жыл бұрын

@@giuliocurti8679 24mm is moderately wide angle. Comparabe to a mobile phone camera field of view.

Another great video and logical breakdown of these lenses. Budget, I just got the Tam 28-75 2,8 Gen 1. I am torn between Sony 16-35 2,8, and the Tam 17-28 2,8, But $$$, weight and overall size it's going be the Tam 17-28 2,8. Cheers.

Shame you couldn't include the Sony 12-24 f4 G, I own it but am considering upgrading to the sigma 14-24mm f2.8. Great vid none the less!

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I wish I could have included a couple more!

Concerning the weird auto deformation in the edges of the image with the Sigma lens. It's normal! This is a setting that must be changed in the Sony camera settings. Look under "lens compensation" and turn off. check links for more info. www.sony.com/electronics/support/articles/00018031

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

It's something that I know Sigma is working on firmware updates to fix this. They've released one for the 24-70 already I believe.

@MZLALA19

3 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit about lens for videography 8i zoom and prime

I got A7i no ibis but I am getting a camera after 2021 so which Len better for me?

@dunnadidit

3 жыл бұрын

My first lens choice would be the sigma 24-70, then if you want an ultra wide angle, the Tamron is great to start but I do love the GM

Hmmm... If so, i might sell my 24-70 gm to get both tamron 17-28 and 28-75. Is this a good decision tho?

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

You’ll have more versatility for sure!

@tommynguyen8620

4 жыл бұрын

Keep the gm, the tamrons are annoying to use. The reversed focus and zoom ring is weird, and the zoom ring is VERY heavy. If you do any video work at all, the tamrons are near worthless.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Tommy Nguyen - I disagree! The Tamron work really well for video the work I’ve been doing. The reversed rings has actually come in handy a few times where I was in awkward positions and needed to access the focus ring with a single finger while still having a hand on the camera. The GM is sick for sure, but there is great value in the Tamrons and calling them near useless seems like a significant exaggeration of any slight flaws you might find in them.

@tommynguyen8620

4 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit I've personally found it impossible to adjust the focal length on any gimbal i have without losing balance and jolting the entire camera around, but ymmv

@morrisgabo8585

4 жыл бұрын

@@tommynguyen8620 i have seen quiet a good amount of youtubers doing well with the tamrons and gimble combo

Id like the Sigma, but the front lens is curved. You cant put filters on it. Not even a UV/Clear filter to protect the glass. So, I cant get it :/ Wish they could make one that would allow for filters

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah it’s tough with the bulbous front element

@awc723

4 жыл бұрын

they do make rear filters...

Dunna ! which font do you use for those prices headlines ???

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Bebas Neue!

how you're doing i'm cliff and i love taking pictures i want your opinion on something i wanted to ask you what's the difference between full frame and asp=c camera? i want to buy 2 camera bodies and give my old canon 400d to ny niece. i love the 80d and the 90d and i love the canon 5d mark 4 but i'm trying to buy one at a good price i want your opinion on buying a few lens 1. tamron 18-400 2. sigma 17-50 3. tamron 10-24 4. canon 50mm 5. canon 18-135 nanotechnology i want to nuy all of these lenses so help me out

Hi Dunna, is the new Sony 16-55mm native to Apsc?

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Yes it is! Killer lens!

I carry two cameras for stills (A7iii and A6600). I shoot with the 28-75mm f/2.8 Tamron which lives on my a7iii and either the Sony 70-350mm or Sony 10-18mm on the A6600. The small form factors of these two lenses on the A6600 make it relatively easy to carry the second camera/lens.

I have an a6400, do you have any cheap wide-angle lens recommendations for a crop sensor?

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

That’s a tough one. For zoom lenses, the only thing in a similar range would be the 10-18 f4 but I don’t have any experience with it. If you’re ok with primes, I highly recommend the sigma 16mm f1.4

@amitkrupal1234

4 жыл бұрын

Samyang 12 f2 NCS manual focus only

@alexandrah.4244

4 жыл бұрын

Karlo's Corner On my A6400 I use the Sony 1018 f4 and the Sigma 16mm 1.4 for Lowlight situations. This lenses makes a very good job on APSC.

@tchlin

3 жыл бұрын

I have both the 10-18 F4 I bought on ebay used for $600 and the sigma 16mm contemporary. Can't go wrong with either one but I keep both like Alexandra husarek said the 16mm is great for low light and is sharp.

I’ve got both the Ziess 16-35 f4 and the Tamron 17-28 f2.8... I don’t know whether to keep both or sell either of them... I love them both hahaha.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Haha I hear you, out of the 4, those are the two I own and I’m still not 100% sure I want to get rid of either of them.

@thekback

4 жыл бұрын

First world problems right! Hahahaa

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

thekback - 100%

For a while I agonized over whether to get one of the 16-35's. I had bought the 100-400GM a few months earlier, and my wife was giving me the eyeroll whenever I talked about getting another lens. But the talking heads on youtube all told me I needed a 16-35 for my holy trinity, so I was leaning toward the f/4 to save some money. Then I torpedoed all of that by listening to the little voice in the back of my head that said YOLO and got the 24mm GM instead. Haven't regretted that decision. Plenty wide for me, razor sharp, and just a great lens. Maybe I'll eventually grab the 16-35 f/4 just to have the option, then again that Sigma 14-24 looks pretty tempting to fill the gap...

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

The 24mm is a killer! I kinda wish I made that choice instead of the 16-35 f4

Tamron 17-28 f2.8 or Sony 16-35 f4 which one is good option for my Sony a6400? Give me your suggestion please.

@rabotaebashit

4 жыл бұрын

did you make a choice I have the same situation now

Made the decision and traded in my a6500 and all my lenses.. got an a7iii and the signa 14-24.. amazing lens.. love it.. and there are rear filters are coming for it from what i hear

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

That’s awesome!

@adrianthomas2132

4 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit thats what the credit card company said too.. now looking for a 35 or 50... maybe u could do that soon... 😆

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Adrian Thomas - just got the 55 f1.8 so I’ll probably do something with that soon.

@adrianthomas2132

4 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit awesome!!! Cant wait😊

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

WOOO!

My first zoom lens on the Sony system is the Tamron 28-200 which I'm very happy with so the Tamron 17-28 will fit the bill nicely!

Pretty disappointed you didn't review that 5th "drinkable" lens 😐 Haha great comparison video tho bro!

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Lol! I reviewed it until it was empty haha! Cheers brother!

@Pleasestandby

4 жыл бұрын

@@dunnadidit 😂 touché

the choice was $700 for a used Zeiss , or 1200 for the tamron. Which way would you go? do you feel the f2.8 is $500 extra at such a wide aperture?

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Ooh tough one. I’d probably go zeiss. That’s a killer deal.

Can you do editing to lightroom on the phone?

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Yup! There is a mobile version of Lightroom!

12-24 g lens ?

Funny that - after much deliberation I actually just bought the Sony Zeiss f/4 :D. Soz! Reasons being the Sigma and GM are above my budget, the Zeiss is on special offers here in the UK making it ~50 USD/40 GBP cheaper than the Tamron, and then I do appreciate the OSS and longer zoom range for my style of photography. (I don't shoot wide open much) At original prices (900 GBP Tamron and ~1050 GBP Zeiss) I would have gone for the Tamron, yes.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Nice! That’s a great deal!

How about the focus of tamaron when set on gimbal

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Why would the focus change when it's on a gimbal?

Tamron? I own it, but would advice to look at the Sony's as even today, such a long time after its release, there is no lens profile to fix the barrel distortion in Lightroom. Pretty useless for professional interior and architecture photography. For video it's fine. It's just the RAWs that need correction, which isn't available.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah it's annoying that it doesn't have a profile yet. But it's not too bad to manually adjust the distortion for now.

For APSC you are better off with the Sony 10-18 F4 with OSS. Much better match with focal range considering the crop factor. That basically leaves the 16-35 F4 useless.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

If you’re looking for that ultra wide equivalent for these ranges on FF then yes. It’s really the only option for zooms. But I wouldn’t say that the 16-35 range on apsc is useless. Focal range is pretty subjective and situational.

@malimish

4 жыл бұрын

Situational yes and I assume we were strictly talking about this wide angle range. For this comparison it is not the right focal length to use on a crop sensor. The 10-18 is not an ultra wide on APSC. Its equivalent to about 15-27 field of view. Of course it's not useless for other situations. We may be comparing the 24-70 f4 on a full frame more appropriately with this one an APSC. but to compare it with this batch and the purpose of these wide angle lenses on a full frame, it would not be useful on an APSC.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Mali Mish - I wasn’t talking about the focal range at all for aps-c, I just made mention that I couldn’t suggest it for FF with the other options but that it might be a good option for aps-c since it has oss(not specifically an ultra-wide option, just an option). That was literally why I bought it and it was quite useful. I think we agree for the most part and maybe we’re getting hung up on semantics or something?? I was just responding to the fact that you called it useless. As for the 10-18, my understanding is that the typical definition of ultra-wide would be anything wider than 24mm(FF equivalent.) So 15-27 definitely fits the bill. Maybe I misunderstood what you were saying though.

Would have love to have seen the Sony 10-18mm F4 for APSC lens. It covers most if not all of the FF sensor at most focal distances.

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Interesting! I did actually think about that but I couldn’t get my hands on one in time. Hopefully I can test that out soon!

@syafiqmazli

4 жыл бұрын

How about APS-C + 10-18mm vs FF + Sigma 14-24mm at both widest range. I'm currently own a6400 + 10-18mm. Thinking about upgrading to FF wide setup. Will it worth it? Appreciate your thought

@dunnadidit

4 жыл бұрын

Syafiq Mazli - unfortunately I don’t have either of those lenses to test. It’s all going to be up to what you plan to do with it. The a6400 + 10-18 should serve you well if you don’t need anything too fancy.

@tfm2934

3 жыл бұрын

If you ignore the extreme mustache distortion yes. The price/size is nice though.