Regarding 10:33: "Bigger headlights" in the TR6 versus the TR5? Maybe you learned "the new math", but in the old way I learned mathematics, the 7" round headlights in the TR6 are the same size as the 7" headlights in a TR5. 🤣
@fuelupclassic17 сағат бұрын
You're quite right, they did use the faithful old 7 inch sealed beam headlights that was fitted to so many cars of the era. A slip of the tongue! I probably meant to say bigger lights in general, as the TR6 incorporates larger indicators and side lights as one complete unit, unlike the TR5.
@johnmohanmusic18 сағат бұрын
I don't understand why the U.S. spec cars took such a drastic horsepower hit. Yes, the compression ratio was lowered, but just a bit. And yes, they were outfitted with twin SU Carburetors instead of fuel injection. But my 1972 Datsun 240Z, outfitted with twin Hitachi Carburetors (SU clones) was rated at 150 bhp with an engine that was smaller than that of the TR6 engine. If they had to use Carburetors to meet US emissions (an idea that seems ludicrous to begin with), why not just put bigger carburetors on it?!?!
@fuelupclassic17 сағат бұрын
It was a strange time regarding US emissions regulations and I think most manufacturers scrambled to get something to work to keep sales going, usually at the significant detriment of power. Thankfully today even a USA spec TR6 can produce quite impressive power figures with a little tweaking.
@johnmohanmusic19 сағат бұрын
2:39 Tachometer by Lucas.
@modelcitizen72Күн бұрын
Good driving car! Leave the cosmetics alone and enjoy the vehicle, if it were me.
@fuelupclassic14 сағат бұрын
we've done quite a bit to it since this video :) Thank you for watching.
@onlinebizjpКүн бұрын
Jaguar's sedan designs are truly elegance. Sedans have a calming impression and it's simply irresistible. Thank you🙏
@fuelupclassic14 сағат бұрын
Thank you so much for watching. Matt
@garyestcourt2377Күн бұрын
Random question, when the XJ40 was introduced in 1987 did it carry anything over from the previous XJ , chassis, IRS etc , always been curious 🤔✌️hope yours is all good btw 👍🏻
@fuelupclassic17 сағат бұрын
Great question! I believe the answer is very little and certainly no major components. The XJ40 platform took years to develop and went massively over budget. I suppose in the long run it all worked out, as they were still using a revised version of it all the way up to 2003.
@douglasthompson9482Күн бұрын
I loved the jaguar except for several things….paint quality was questionable. Clear coat lifted. Back seat room is poor for a large sedan. Interior in general was cheaply built. Mine was a xj8 2001.
@fuelupclassic14 сағат бұрын
Interesting! I've not heard of paint quality issues on them before - do you happen to live in a hot climate? All XJ models suffer with poor leg room in the back and the only way to get round it is to go for the LWB option on the X300, X308 and X350 models, which makes a big difference.
@marinman3551Күн бұрын
Great vid however I disagree with your choice of xj...the x300 is the better car in terms of its much much better Interior in my opinion the 308 is a bad upgrade styling wise with over an over use of the oval. Interior the dash is poor the slab facia is very unambitious, the engine of the x300 AJ16 is the ultimate incarnation of the straight six the V8 was hugely problematic and in no way is as refined as the V12, the 308 indeed is a great car. But less so than the x300
@fuelupclassicКүн бұрын
Thank you for watching and glad you enjoyed it. Styling is of course subjective, but both the X300 and X308 are still great looking cars in my eyes, with the X308 feeling just slightly more advanced in every way. I'm a big fan of the X300 and ran one for several years. They're lovely old things but finding a good solid one these days is getting tricky. I will get one on the channel in the near future, as it will be nice to revisit an old friend.
@garethhanna9173Күн бұрын
These are an evolution of the XJ40, which just shows how good the underlying platform launched in 1986 was.
@fuelupclassicКүн бұрын
Jaguar were very good at eking out a platform or engine for as long as possible! Not a criticism at all and usually with very impressive results.
@BEGGARWOOD1Күн бұрын
Good Old Ford
@fuelupclassicКүн бұрын
Absolutely! They did a great job really. Invested billions, increased build quality dramatically and helped move the cars into the modern age. I believe Ford also claimed they didn't make a penny from their ownership of Jaguar. Either way their investment likely saved Jaguar.
@roygardiner22292 күн бұрын
What a beauty.♥
@detonator21122 күн бұрын
I'm not a Jaguar expert but I think the successor of this model that had higher rear end is the best looking sedan ever made. This is a bit too flat and too long to my eye. This is still a very good looking car too, but that successor perfected the looks (imho).
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
You may be thinking of the XJ X350 model, which did indeed come after the X308. I have an X350 and it's a great car but ever so slightly lacks the old world charm of the earlier models.
@detonator21122 күн бұрын
@@fuelupclassic Ok. I don't see it that way at all. To me it still had all the charm. The completely new XJ that came around 2010'ish? is actually pretty good looking car too but on that I agree it lost all the charm of the old Jags. But overall I really like how all old Jags look. Mercedes always had the technical edge but Jaguars have much more "soul".
@matthewdavies44722 күн бұрын
Great review !! Spot on .
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it and thank you for watching.
@alexandrecouture24622 күн бұрын
"It has its own smell, it's intoxicating". I remember that, from my XJ40. The fuel tank may have gone bad. 😂 Nevertheless, it's a wonderful car!
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
Hahaha!
@jamescampbell43342 күн бұрын
I own a TitanSilver/black interior 2003 4.4 Sport Pkg X5 with over 230k miles. August '03 production makes it one of the final pre-facelift/M62 V8 engine E53s. The service dept guys at my local BMW dealership (Plano, Texas) told me I held onto the right X5. I run staggered 19" HRE wheels w/ Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R tires in the summer (soft compound) and non-staggered OE 18"s w/ P-Zero all season tires in the winter. Did a 2k mile road trip (Dallas-Atlanta-Dallas) a few weeks ago. Ran flawlessly. Hope to see 250k miles next year.
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
Fantastic! Glad to hear that you're really enjoying X5 ownership. Thank you for watching.
@paulfitzgerald75132 күн бұрын
I have two 308’s, one a 3.2 sport, the other a Daimler 4.0 n/a that is superb looking. Personally I prefer the looks of the 308’s, the 350’s just look like an x type that’s been stretched slightly whereas the 308’s are a modern version of the original xj’s. Yes they may rot but so do the aluminium ones too although not as drastically. I’m a big fan of the series one and two xj having had several in my time so I’m happy enough driving in my modern equivalent 😊
@goodfest0072 күн бұрын
Nice car - but boy that was the longest down hill drive I have ever seen 😁.
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
Hahaha! I've learnt that the bigger the driveway, the more opportunity there is to fill it with cars, much to my neighbours annoyance i'm sure!
@alexandrecouture24622 күн бұрын
no, the camera angle @@fuelupclassic
@fuelupclassicКүн бұрын
@@alexandrecouture2462 Oh yes! The angle makes it appear to be one long downward slope but in reality it's a mixture of hills and great corners, with some great scenery too.
@Vince_uk2 күн бұрын
Still one of the most beautiful cars ever produced
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
Still looks great doesn't it.
@oldclassiccarUK2 күн бұрын
don't ask what I've been looking at lately .... mmmmm
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
@@oldclassiccarUK hmm i'm curious now! 🤔
@nigel.w3 күн бұрын
This car is clearly a nice example of an early V8 Jag, and I know there are many fans of the X308. Personally, I'm not a fan of the V8 Jags. I like sixes and twelves, unless we're talking a flat-plane crank Ferrari. I like the X300 -- the AJ16 engine is one of the best straight sixes ever -- and the X350 XJ6 petrol. As I currently live in London it would have to be an X350, and of course there are several V8 variants if one prefers. I also think the X351 remains a stunning car. Whenever I see one it looks stylish, current, and special. However, IMO the V6 diesel is the engine to go for if buying an X351, and you'll need a late example to be ULEZ compliant. Overall, I think the X350 XJ6 petrol is a rather compelling package. Three to five grand can get you into quite a good one. Seven to nine grand can get you into a stunning low-mileage example, but that's a lot of money to spend when average examples only fetch two to two-and-a-half. I have to say, I'm also a big fan of the XJ40 -- IMO the styling is very balanced and just works -- and the Series 3 cars, although I think you need to be a true enthusiast to own one and simply must have a garage or carport, otherwise there's no stopping the rust.
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
Absolutely! The early cars are really only in the hands of enthusiasts now and do require a certain level of upkeep, nonetheless my Series 3 remains one of my favourites. I also have an X350 V6 petrol and it's a great machine. 165,000 miles and it's still going strong and is pretty much used daily. Technically it's better than the X308 in so many ways and can easily be picked up for the same sort of price, so it's easy to see why people may choose one over an X308. Although the air suspension doesn't give the exquisite ride of earlier XJs and they don't quite have the same charm about them. Finding a really good and solid X300 is difficult these days, but they're a wonderful blend of old school Jag and modern(ish) reliability.
@nigel.w2 күн бұрын
@@fuelupclassic Just to say, your S3 is a beauty.
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
@@nigel.w Thank you - it's not perfect by any means but holds a lot of sentimental value. The dream is to one day own a Series 1, 2 and 3.
@peoplehavetherights3 күн бұрын
I liked the Jaguar XJ8 of steel, but the later X350 model was aluminum, much less a problem in aluminium than steel and lighter as weill. Gearbox was also upgraded to the six speed, and driving 75mph all day at 28-31mpg was no bother. Still drive it yhis day and i truly love it.
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
I really enjoy my X350 too and in so many ways it's a superior car to the X308, but the earlier models just have a certain charm about them.
@madnesstvmadtv56903 күн бұрын
Defo modern classic e53 3.0d le mans edition ❤🔥
@alastairwatson32013 күн бұрын
I think your categorisation of the C as being a grand tourer is valid, although I’m not qualified to comment on it as a budget Aston Martin alternative. I was horrified by the state of the under bonnet wiring, though; it didn’t look like part of a £20k resto to me.
@MrRandyForbes4 күн бұрын
I hope that you also have the correct shift lever, as I've been led to believe they're not interchangeable with the non-ovd 3-sync ones. I'm in the process of restoring a '67 MGB GT; a UK delivery car to a US Serviceman stationed in Germany (where the car remained until 1988). I "acquired" it in 2020, but before I took anything apart__it had sat dormant, outside in Massachusetts since '95, sinking into the earth__I wanted to get it running/driving (and stopping...) etc., and also took a 3-year ordeal to get it properly licensed/registered. Anyway, I DID get it running/driving and was pleasantly surprised that the overdrive not only worked, SO DID THE VACUUM SWITCH! I've had a couple other 3-sync MGB ('66 & '67 rdstrs) that had overdrive, so I recognize the value in the fact that my current GT is VERY COMPLETE, VERY ORIGINAL, and very rusty! I'm retired (from working on BMW M Coupes/M Rdstrs) so what else am I going to do with my time ;)
@fuelupclassic2 күн бұрын
Thankfully I have the correct gear lever for the overdrive box. Good luck with your project, it sounds like it's going to be a lot of fun!
@albertknight19716 күн бұрын
Worth restoring it for the plate, " Fly ".
@fuelupclassic6 күн бұрын
It does suit the car well.
@SeededGarden7 күн бұрын
I thought my '14 E350 was nice... These are gorgeous.
@pires9087 күн бұрын
Great job, looks lovely. I might of tried a silver grill on it
@fuelupclassic5 күн бұрын
Thank you.
@peterdaisleyworrall94587 күн бұрын
The best car out of Abingdon post war. Hugely misunderstood by so many and those in that camp missed the boat big time! A baby Aston Martin is definitely a worthy comment. I have owned C´s for more than 40years and have loved them from day 1. Very well built and - in the best possible way - a bit over engineered and massively strong. The engine is also very robust, very tuneable with the second version of the BMC C series 6 so much smoother than the series 1 that powered the Austin Healey. Great video, thank you.
@fuelupclassic7 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it.
@kenbradley50358 күн бұрын
We did what the car was designed for back in 1985 and took our V12 from Essex to South of France and what a memorable trip, fast, agile and quite. we were also at Le Mans for the Jaguar 1-2 win and all the locals sticking two fingers up at us. chuckle...what salad days.
@fuelupclassic7 күн бұрын
Wonderful! There's no finer car to cover long distances than a silky smooth V12 Jag.
@kcsi18 күн бұрын
If I had an invention with which I could save humanity, I would ask for the restart of the production of the Jaguar XJ 2 and 3 series in return.
@marcelodagrella82958 күн бұрын
Discovery 1 😍
@georgebanksesq10 күн бұрын
What a wonderful story.
@paulhelman237611 күн бұрын
Morgan's are the ultimate Brit sports car and still in business too.
@fuelupclassic9 күн бұрын
I do enjoy a Morgan, we've already featured one on the channel and have a few more different models lined up to feature in the near future.
@tommisalo861511 күн бұрын
Triumph made so many beautiful, gorgeous looking cars, but tr6 is not one of them. This car looks bad. It has all the right proportions and the classic british recipe but everything is just slightly wrong.
@fuelupclassic7 күн бұрын
Interesting point! It's the first time i've ever heard anyone describe the TR6 as 'looking bad', but then again looks are of course deeply subjective and each to their own.
@landsky592511 күн бұрын
what engine do you have?
@fuelupclassic11 күн бұрын
2.8 litre six cylinder petrol.
@landsky592511 күн бұрын
@@fuelupclassic nice car
@SP00TNIC11 күн бұрын
Arnage.. looks like a word from those 1970s Pr®n films, Yaa BaaBy lay down on the bed because im going to give you the Arnage 🍌!!! Hahaha
@SP00TNIC11 күн бұрын
The only unfortunate defect is the steering wheel color should have not been burgundy.. should be white or whatever the seat color is
@fuelupclassic9 күн бұрын
I really don't mind it at all :)
@antronebatts890512 күн бұрын
Just brought a 2 95 sl 500 Benz on Easter 🐣 needs work but I love it
@fuelupclassic11 күн бұрын
Enjoy!
@acs10813 күн бұрын
In Australia the petrols are surprisingly common. Maybe we were behind the times. That being said, I have the diesel model and it's great! I cant see how a petrol model would be more economical, and we have no tax on emissions here so thats not a problem. Add to that the 500nm of torque the diesel provides for towing, which is more than a lot of modern cars, and you have a great vehicle!
@notabovebutequal15 күн бұрын
How is the front bumper when going over speed bumps and steep driveway entrances? Any trouble with the car being so low?
@fuelupclassic14 күн бұрын
Not too bad actually! It's low but I didn't experience any issues with speed bumps etc.
@notabovebutequal14 күн бұрын
@@fuelupclassic thank you and very helpful as I am soon to purchase a DB9.
@fuelupclassic14 күн бұрын
@@notabovebutequal Good luck with your purchase, they are wonderful cars.
@zekehanscom586915 күн бұрын
1969 TR6 North American model. Recent complete resto mod. New white / tan interior, poly bushings throughout, SUH6 Carbs, J-type OD, Bob Tullius Group 44 livery, Panasports (mini lite) wheels, level 2 street cam, electric fuel pump, oil cooler, Lumenition Magnetronic ignition upgrade, FALKEN 205 / 15 radial tires, and leather upholstery with wool carpet replacement.
@fuelupclassic7 күн бұрын
Sounds fantastic! Enjoy :)
@zekehanscom58697 күн бұрын
@@fuelupclassic I am. Can't not have the biggest smile every time I drive it.
@ewebbytrailscout15 күн бұрын
great video, I have a 2001 e53 3.0 gas with 270k miles in Arizona, had issues with oil leaks at about 140k, window regulators, coils at 220, control arms front every 80k as well as water pumps, learned to do my own repairs. Just replaced fan clutch, hoses, pulleys, thermostat. burns 1 quart every 700-1000 miles. Change oil every 8k. wax with P21 Carnuba wax every 4 months. akebono euro ceramic pads have lasted 165k miles and still 25% left. Check your transfer case and front drive shaft splines, replaced mine at 240k as they were halfway worn.
@tomscott993815 күн бұрын
I love that the numberplate on the photos of your old MGF spells SORN!
@fuelupclassic15 күн бұрын
Good spot! I had forgotten all about that. Sadly I think it may have been scrapped long ago now.
@andybroer65115 күн бұрын
My dad had a TR8 back in the day. That was a lovely car to drive!
@fuelupclassic7 күн бұрын
We've got to get one on the channel at some point. The addition of a V8 is almost always a good thing, in my opinion.
@andybroer6516 күн бұрын
@@fuelupclassic I've considered picking one up then swapping with the 4.6L V8 which should shoe horn in just fine 🙂
@andybroer65115 күн бұрын
'72 TR6 hopped up by Jay Leno's head mechanic Bernard Juchli (before he worked for Jay) custom camshaft, 3-dual throat Webers, High compression cylinders, electronic ignition, custom headers and exhaust, rear sway bar, competition springs and shocks, balanced, lightened flywheel, steel wheels painted body color (Saffron) with trim rings and 2 painted St.Andrew's Crosses on both sides in lieu of the Union Jack badges :-)
@fuelupclassic7 күн бұрын
Wonderful! Great fun to drive, i'm sure.
@andybroer6516 күн бұрын
@@fuelupclassic it is a bit throttle happy with the lightened fly wheel, but never boring LOL!
@retrofuturewave490916 күн бұрын
Every time I sell one of my BMWs it starts rising in value and I was just exploring selling my 3.0 e53 so I’m certain you’re right that soon I’ll be spending twice as much to buy one back. Ask me how much I got for my e28 535i (wait don’t ask me)
@fuelupclassic7 күн бұрын
Ahhh i'm with you on that! I once (not that long ago) sold a really nice E30 touring for less than £2,000! I'd love an E28 though!
@scorcha10016 күн бұрын
I was recently looking for a cheap car which i could use for tip runs and was offered one identical to yours including being a 3.0 petrol for £750. I was expecting it to be a heap of junk riddled with faults but it was by far the opposite. I cant believe how refined and well built it is. The plan was to run it around for a couple of months then get rid as i couldn’t see myself loosing any money on it but now i think i might just do a few maintenance bits on it and keep hold of it. Even if it was to break and i decided to break it for parts its a win win
@fuelupclassic16 күн бұрын
That's great to hear! As you say a complete win win whichever way you look at it.
@michaelminervini190816 күн бұрын
What can i expect for maintence on these cars and yearly costs? Does it need constant repairs and replacement parts? Im thinking of buying one but I dont want to have to have it in the shop after each use as someone told me. Id just be using it to go a couple miles (10 max) a couple times a week maybe longer on occassion.
@fuelupclassic16 күн бұрын
In the UK they are very well supported by a number of specialists, so parts supply is generally not a big issue. It's very hard to say whether a 40+ year old car will be completely reliable as there are so many variables. I would advise buying the best you can afford and having it independently inspected by a specialist beforehand and if you're able to do some work yourself, you will likely save a fortune. General upkeep and overall spend should then be minimal. They're great fun and still a bit of a bargain!
@tcaudiobooks73717 күн бұрын
They've never bettered the original X5. It defied the laws of physics and drove like a sporty saloon car... which the follow ups never did.
@tommcdonald174618 күн бұрын
Very good video. I have a 2000 clk320 with 59K miles and it's in excellent condition. I'm the second owner. Everything is original and everything works including the CD changer. Question; when you say wings what do you mean? Also, you suggested a set of AMG wheels. My car came with 16 inch 7 spoke bright chrome wheels with ET37. What size rims would you recommend with an ET that would be compatible. Would you recommend all 4 be the same size or the rear being a different size. The ET is my biggest concern. Thxs. Tom
@fuelupclassic17 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed the video and thank you for watching. Wings is what you may call 'fenders' depending on where you are in the world? Whatever you call them (wings, fenders etc..) the CLK or any Mercedes of this era have a bit of a reputation for rust, so it's important to check them regularly. When it comes to wheels, a good pair of AMG Monoblocs (genuine or replica) always suit this era of Mercedes really well in my opinion. I hope you continue to enjoy your CLK for many years a miles to come. Matt
Пікірлер
"The shape of things to come".
Regarding 10:33: "Bigger headlights" in the TR6 versus the TR5? Maybe you learned "the new math", but in the old way I learned mathematics, the 7" round headlights in the TR6 are the same size as the 7" headlights in a TR5. 🤣
You're quite right, they did use the faithful old 7 inch sealed beam headlights that was fitted to so many cars of the era. A slip of the tongue! I probably meant to say bigger lights in general, as the TR6 incorporates larger indicators and side lights as one complete unit, unlike the TR5.
I don't understand why the U.S. spec cars took such a drastic horsepower hit. Yes, the compression ratio was lowered, but just a bit. And yes, they were outfitted with twin SU Carburetors instead of fuel injection. But my 1972 Datsun 240Z, outfitted with twin Hitachi Carburetors (SU clones) was rated at 150 bhp with an engine that was smaller than that of the TR6 engine. If they had to use Carburetors to meet US emissions (an idea that seems ludicrous to begin with), why not just put bigger carburetors on it?!?!
It was a strange time regarding US emissions regulations and I think most manufacturers scrambled to get something to work to keep sales going, usually at the significant detriment of power. Thankfully today even a USA spec TR6 can produce quite impressive power figures with a little tweaking.
2:39 Tachometer by Lucas.
Good driving car! Leave the cosmetics alone and enjoy the vehicle, if it were me.
we've done quite a bit to it since this video :) Thank you for watching.
Jaguar's sedan designs are truly elegance. Sedans have a calming impression and it's simply irresistible. Thank you🙏
Thank you so much for watching. Matt
Random question, when the XJ40 was introduced in 1987 did it carry anything over from the previous XJ , chassis, IRS etc , always been curious 🤔✌️hope yours is all good btw 👍🏻
Great question! I believe the answer is very little and certainly no major components. The XJ40 platform took years to develop and went massively over budget. I suppose in the long run it all worked out, as they were still using a revised version of it all the way up to 2003.
I loved the jaguar except for several things….paint quality was questionable. Clear coat lifted. Back seat room is poor for a large sedan. Interior in general was cheaply built. Mine was a xj8 2001.
Interesting! I've not heard of paint quality issues on them before - do you happen to live in a hot climate? All XJ models suffer with poor leg room in the back and the only way to get round it is to go for the LWB option on the X300, X308 and X350 models, which makes a big difference.
Great vid however I disagree with your choice of xj...the x300 is the better car in terms of its much much better Interior in my opinion the 308 is a bad upgrade styling wise with over an over use of the oval. Interior the dash is poor the slab facia is very unambitious, the engine of the x300 AJ16 is the ultimate incarnation of the straight six the V8 was hugely problematic and in no way is as refined as the V12, the 308 indeed is a great car. But less so than the x300
Thank you for watching and glad you enjoyed it. Styling is of course subjective, but both the X300 and X308 are still great looking cars in my eyes, with the X308 feeling just slightly more advanced in every way. I'm a big fan of the X300 and ran one for several years. They're lovely old things but finding a good solid one these days is getting tricky. I will get one on the channel in the near future, as it will be nice to revisit an old friend.
These are an evolution of the XJ40, which just shows how good the underlying platform launched in 1986 was.
Jaguar were very good at eking out a platform or engine for as long as possible! Not a criticism at all and usually with very impressive results.
Good Old Ford
Absolutely! They did a great job really. Invested billions, increased build quality dramatically and helped move the cars into the modern age. I believe Ford also claimed they didn't make a penny from their ownership of Jaguar. Either way their investment likely saved Jaguar.
What a beauty.♥
I'm not a Jaguar expert but I think the successor of this model that had higher rear end is the best looking sedan ever made. This is a bit too flat and too long to my eye. This is still a very good looking car too, but that successor perfected the looks (imho).
You may be thinking of the XJ X350 model, which did indeed come after the X308. I have an X350 and it's a great car but ever so slightly lacks the old world charm of the earlier models.
@@fuelupclassic Ok. I don't see it that way at all. To me it still had all the charm. The completely new XJ that came around 2010'ish? is actually pretty good looking car too but on that I agree it lost all the charm of the old Jags. But overall I really like how all old Jags look. Mercedes always had the technical edge but Jaguars have much more "soul".
Great review !! Spot on .
Glad you enjoyed it and thank you for watching.
"It has its own smell, it's intoxicating". I remember that, from my XJ40. The fuel tank may have gone bad. 😂 Nevertheless, it's a wonderful car!
Hahaha!
I own a TitanSilver/black interior 2003 4.4 Sport Pkg X5 with over 230k miles. August '03 production makes it one of the final pre-facelift/M62 V8 engine E53s. The service dept guys at my local BMW dealership (Plano, Texas) told me I held onto the right X5. I run staggered 19" HRE wheels w/ Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R tires in the summer (soft compound) and non-staggered OE 18"s w/ P-Zero all season tires in the winter. Did a 2k mile road trip (Dallas-Atlanta-Dallas) a few weeks ago. Ran flawlessly. Hope to see 250k miles next year.
Fantastic! Glad to hear that you're really enjoying X5 ownership. Thank you for watching.
I have two 308’s, one a 3.2 sport, the other a Daimler 4.0 n/a that is superb looking. Personally I prefer the looks of the 308’s, the 350’s just look like an x type that’s been stretched slightly whereas the 308’s are a modern version of the original xj’s. Yes they may rot but so do the aluminium ones too although not as drastically. I’m a big fan of the series one and two xj having had several in my time so I’m happy enough driving in my modern equivalent 😊
Nice car - but boy that was the longest down hill drive I have ever seen 😁.
Hahaha! I've learnt that the bigger the driveway, the more opportunity there is to fill it with cars, much to my neighbours annoyance i'm sure!
no, the camera angle @@fuelupclassic
@@alexandrecouture2462 Oh yes! The angle makes it appear to be one long downward slope but in reality it's a mixture of hills and great corners, with some great scenery too.
Still one of the most beautiful cars ever produced
Still looks great doesn't it.
don't ask what I've been looking at lately .... mmmmm
@@oldclassiccarUK hmm i'm curious now! 🤔
This car is clearly a nice example of an early V8 Jag, and I know there are many fans of the X308. Personally, I'm not a fan of the V8 Jags. I like sixes and twelves, unless we're talking a flat-plane crank Ferrari. I like the X300 -- the AJ16 engine is one of the best straight sixes ever -- and the X350 XJ6 petrol. As I currently live in London it would have to be an X350, and of course there are several V8 variants if one prefers. I also think the X351 remains a stunning car. Whenever I see one it looks stylish, current, and special. However, IMO the V6 diesel is the engine to go for if buying an X351, and you'll need a late example to be ULEZ compliant. Overall, I think the X350 XJ6 petrol is a rather compelling package. Three to five grand can get you into quite a good one. Seven to nine grand can get you into a stunning low-mileage example, but that's a lot of money to spend when average examples only fetch two to two-and-a-half. I have to say, I'm also a big fan of the XJ40 -- IMO the styling is very balanced and just works -- and the Series 3 cars, although I think you need to be a true enthusiast to own one and simply must have a garage or carport, otherwise there's no stopping the rust.
Absolutely! The early cars are really only in the hands of enthusiasts now and do require a certain level of upkeep, nonetheless my Series 3 remains one of my favourites. I also have an X350 V6 petrol and it's a great machine. 165,000 miles and it's still going strong and is pretty much used daily. Technically it's better than the X308 in so many ways and can easily be picked up for the same sort of price, so it's easy to see why people may choose one over an X308. Although the air suspension doesn't give the exquisite ride of earlier XJs and they don't quite have the same charm about them. Finding a really good and solid X300 is difficult these days, but they're a wonderful blend of old school Jag and modern(ish) reliability.
@@fuelupclassic Just to say, your S3 is a beauty.
@@nigel.w Thank you - it's not perfect by any means but holds a lot of sentimental value. The dream is to one day own a Series 1, 2 and 3.
I liked the Jaguar XJ8 of steel, but the later X350 model was aluminum, much less a problem in aluminium than steel and lighter as weill. Gearbox was also upgraded to the six speed, and driving 75mph all day at 28-31mpg was no bother. Still drive it yhis day and i truly love it.
I really enjoy my X350 too and in so many ways it's a superior car to the X308, but the earlier models just have a certain charm about them.
Defo modern classic e53 3.0d le mans edition ❤🔥
I think your categorisation of the C as being a grand tourer is valid, although I’m not qualified to comment on it as a budget Aston Martin alternative. I was horrified by the state of the under bonnet wiring, though; it didn’t look like part of a £20k resto to me.
I hope that you also have the correct shift lever, as I've been led to believe they're not interchangeable with the non-ovd 3-sync ones. I'm in the process of restoring a '67 MGB GT; a UK delivery car to a US Serviceman stationed in Germany (where the car remained until 1988). I "acquired" it in 2020, but before I took anything apart__it had sat dormant, outside in Massachusetts since '95, sinking into the earth__I wanted to get it running/driving (and stopping...) etc., and also took a 3-year ordeal to get it properly licensed/registered. Anyway, I DID get it running/driving and was pleasantly surprised that the overdrive not only worked, SO DID THE VACUUM SWITCH! I've had a couple other 3-sync MGB ('66 & '67 rdstrs) that had overdrive, so I recognize the value in the fact that my current GT is VERY COMPLETE, VERY ORIGINAL, and very rusty! I'm retired (from working on BMW M Coupes/M Rdstrs) so what else am I going to do with my time ;)
Thankfully I have the correct gear lever for the overdrive box. Good luck with your project, it sounds like it's going to be a lot of fun!
Worth restoring it for the plate, " Fly ".
It does suit the car well.
I thought my '14 E350 was nice... These are gorgeous.
Great job, looks lovely. I might of tried a silver grill on it
Thank you.
The best car out of Abingdon post war. Hugely misunderstood by so many and those in that camp missed the boat big time! A baby Aston Martin is definitely a worthy comment. I have owned C´s for more than 40years and have loved them from day 1. Very well built and - in the best possible way - a bit over engineered and massively strong. The engine is also very robust, very tuneable with the second version of the BMC C series 6 so much smoother than the series 1 that powered the Austin Healey. Great video, thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it.
We did what the car was designed for back in 1985 and took our V12 from Essex to South of France and what a memorable trip, fast, agile and quite. we were also at Le Mans for the Jaguar 1-2 win and all the locals sticking two fingers up at us. chuckle...what salad days.
Wonderful! There's no finer car to cover long distances than a silky smooth V12 Jag.
If I had an invention with which I could save humanity, I would ask for the restart of the production of the Jaguar XJ 2 and 3 series in return.
Discovery 1 😍
What a wonderful story.
Morgan's are the ultimate Brit sports car and still in business too.
I do enjoy a Morgan, we've already featured one on the channel and have a few more different models lined up to feature in the near future.
Triumph made so many beautiful, gorgeous looking cars, but tr6 is not one of them. This car looks bad. It has all the right proportions and the classic british recipe but everything is just slightly wrong.
Interesting point! It's the first time i've ever heard anyone describe the TR6 as 'looking bad', but then again looks are of course deeply subjective and each to their own.
what engine do you have?
2.8 litre six cylinder petrol.
@@fuelupclassic nice car
Arnage.. looks like a word from those 1970s Pr®n films, Yaa BaaBy lay down on the bed because im going to give you the Arnage 🍌!!! Hahaha
The only unfortunate defect is the steering wheel color should have not been burgundy.. should be white or whatever the seat color is
I really don't mind it at all :)
Just brought a 2 95 sl 500 Benz on Easter 🐣 needs work but I love it
Enjoy!
In Australia the petrols are surprisingly common. Maybe we were behind the times. That being said, I have the diesel model and it's great! I cant see how a petrol model would be more economical, and we have no tax on emissions here so thats not a problem. Add to that the 500nm of torque the diesel provides for towing, which is more than a lot of modern cars, and you have a great vehicle!
How is the front bumper when going over speed bumps and steep driveway entrances? Any trouble with the car being so low?
Not too bad actually! It's low but I didn't experience any issues with speed bumps etc.
@@fuelupclassic thank you and very helpful as I am soon to purchase a DB9.
@@notabovebutequal Good luck with your purchase, they are wonderful cars.
1969 TR6 North American model. Recent complete resto mod. New white / tan interior, poly bushings throughout, SUH6 Carbs, J-type OD, Bob Tullius Group 44 livery, Panasports (mini lite) wheels, level 2 street cam, electric fuel pump, oil cooler, Lumenition Magnetronic ignition upgrade, FALKEN 205 / 15 radial tires, and leather upholstery with wool carpet replacement.
Sounds fantastic! Enjoy :)
@@fuelupclassic I am. Can't not have the biggest smile every time I drive it.
great video, I have a 2001 e53 3.0 gas with 270k miles in Arizona, had issues with oil leaks at about 140k, window regulators, coils at 220, control arms front every 80k as well as water pumps, learned to do my own repairs. Just replaced fan clutch, hoses, pulleys, thermostat. burns 1 quart every 700-1000 miles. Change oil every 8k. wax with P21 Carnuba wax every 4 months. akebono euro ceramic pads have lasted 165k miles and still 25% left. Check your transfer case and front drive shaft splines, replaced mine at 240k as they were halfway worn.
I love that the numberplate on the photos of your old MGF spells SORN!
Good spot! I had forgotten all about that. Sadly I think it may have been scrapped long ago now.
My dad had a TR8 back in the day. That was a lovely car to drive!
We've got to get one on the channel at some point. The addition of a V8 is almost always a good thing, in my opinion.
@@fuelupclassic I've considered picking one up then swapping with the 4.6L V8 which should shoe horn in just fine 🙂
'72 TR6 hopped up by Jay Leno's head mechanic Bernard Juchli (before he worked for Jay) custom camshaft, 3-dual throat Webers, High compression cylinders, electronic ignition, custom headers and exhaust, rear sway bar, competition springs and shocks, balanced, lightened flywheel, steel wheels painted body color (Saffron) with trim rings and 2 painted St.Andrew's Crosses on both sides in lieu of the Union Jack badges :-)
Wonderful! Great fun to drive, i'm sure.
@@fuelupclassic it is a bit throttle happy with the lightened fly wheel, but never boring LOL!
Every time I sell one of my BMWs it starts rising in value and I was just exploring selling my 3.0 e53 so I’m certain you’re right that soon I’ll be spending twice as much to buy one back. Ask me how much I got for my e28 535i (wait don’t ask me)
Ahhh i'm with you on that! I once (not that long ago) sold a really nice E30 touring for less than £2,000! I'd love an E28 though!
I was recently looking for a cheap car which i could use for tip runs and was offered one identical to yours including being a 3.0 petrol for £750. I was expecting it to be a heap of junk riddled with faults but it was by far the opposite. I cant believe how refined and well built it is. The plan was to run it around for a couple of months then get rid as i couldn’t see myself loosing any money on it but now i think i might just do a few maintenance bits on it and keep hold of it. Even if it was to break and i decided to break it for parts its a win win
That's great to hear! As you say a complete win win whichever way you look at it.
What can i expect for maintence on these cars and yearly costs? Does it need constant repairs and replacement parts? Im thinking of buying one but I dont want to have to have it in the shop after each use as someone told me. Id just be using it to go a couple miles (10 max) a couple times a week maybe longer on occassion.
In the UK they are very well supported by a number of specialists, so parts supply is generally not a big issue. It's very hard to say whether a 40+ year old car will be completely reliable as there are so many variables. I would advise buying the best you can afford and having it independently inspected by a specialist beforehand and if you're able to do some work yourself, you will likely save a fortune. General upkeep and overall spend should then be minimal. They're great fun and still a bit of a bargain!
They've never bettered the original X5. It defied the laws of physics and drove like a sporty saloon car... which the follow ups never did.
Very good video. I have a 2000 clk320 with 59K miles and it's in excellent condition. I'm the second owner. Everything is original and everything works including the CD changer. Question; when you say wings what do you mean? Also, you suggested a set of AMG wheels. My car came with 16 inch 7 spoke bright chrome wheels with ET37. What size rims would you recommend with an ET that would be compatible. Would you recommend all 4 be the same size or the rear being a different size. The ET is my biggest concern. Thxs. Tom
Glad you enjoyed the video and thank you for watching. Wings is what you may call 'fenders' depending on where you are in the world? Whatever you call them (wings, fenders etc..) the CLK or any Mercedes of this era have a bit of a reputation for rust, so it's important to check them regularly. When it comes to wheels, a good pair of AMG Monoblocs (genuine or replica) always suit this era of Mercedes really well in my opinion. I hope you continue to enjoy your CLK for many years a miles to come. Matt