O wow so we have gone from big Bang theory to DARK Matter theory 😄🤡🤡🤡
@pansepot14907 сағат бұрын
Thanks for the update!
@peteronyoutube6128 сағат бұрын
Appreciate your enthusiasm Chris - don't miss any of your posts.
@valacarno8 сағат бұрын
What a great update on Euclid! Thank you very much. Looking forward to more Euclid and other news from you! 😍 👍
@howardrisby96219 сағат бұрын
That original Hubble 'Deep Field' image reslly opened the doors for distant universe astronomy and astrophysics. Not bad for what started out as a pretty random suggestion concerning where to point that unprecedented and magnificent tool!
@alphalunamare9 сағат бұрын
Sorry , last time I mentioned a few channels, I ought to have mentioned 'on a par' with Cool Worlds to :-) I find the Drake Equation a total quantative nonsense worthy of only semi sentient Earthlings. I do however find these images of a far more Qualititative nature! Your imigary conveys infinitely more than simple senile statistics :-)
@tonyf.88589 сағат бұрын
Just got up (3:23AM here) and was excited to see you had a new video. Thanks!
@tobiasseyb6592Күн бұрын
This is where it's got it's name: www.starrywonders.com/horseheadsxvh92.jpg
@mortalclown3812Күн бұрын
Just subbed. Enjoy these explanations & images. ✨️
@mortalclown3812Күн бұрын
Didn't know about Euclid before. Rapt. Thank you.
@soppdrakeКүн бұрын
Lovely! Goes to simply show why there are three different telescopes up there, instead of just one. Your comparison of the distance covered by VGer in relation the JWST's gorgeous image is utterly thought-provoking!
@truecerium4924Күн бұрын
Are there plans to photograph the remainder of the horse head with JWST?
@alphalunamareКүн бұрын
When it comes to choosing between telescopes I would not. Each has a talent, a way of 'sensing' a reality. If I am working on my engine I can see the parts but sometimes I have to close my eyes and 'see' with my fingers where intricate parts are. Touch is as important as Sight in forming a model of what I am trying to fix. We use our senses in a myriad of ways to gain a more perfect understanding. Such should be the same with telescopes, not a partiality of choice but of a truer perception.
@alphalunamareКүн бұрын
You, Anton and Sabine are The 'go to' people for Astronomy! :-)
@pencilpauli9442Күн бұрын
Wow. Love how we get to see the nebula in a wider view to place it in context then can zoom in. All three images are tops in their own right, but having all three is so much more incredible!
@chrisantoniou4366Күн бұрын
Perhaps create images from Euclid and Hubble the same size as JWST to compare resolutions...
@sweetbb125Күн бұрын
I'm not sure about the horsehead. Could you please overlay a very simple drawing of the horsehead on the photo of the nebula in your next video?
@user-vl3zj8mm7eКүн бұрын
❤❤❤
@susanjane4784Күн бұрын
I'm still a Hubble fan. This is a great video showing the differences, but I still prefer Hubble's incredible textures, translucent colors, and vibe. Even this many years later Hubble images make me feel awe and wonder.
@danfobb8301Күн бұрын
wonderful
@goldfish31fulКүн бұрын
I"ve imaged the horsehead many times and never knew there were so many galaxies behind just a small portion of it. Incredible!
@yrobtsvtКүн бұрын
Amazing to see all those galaxies behind the nebula for the first time
@stephenking8754Күн бұрын
Spot on Chris 🚀 🛰🛰🌙 🌞🌞🌞🌞
@valacarnoКүн бұрын
What a beautiful video. Thank you.
@rextrekКүн бұрын
7th excellent vid.....Love this stuff........hurts my head/ but LOVE IT......but but but some Sky Gawd cares what we humans do with our HooHoos'& PP's riiiiiiiight
@cyrilioКүн бұрын
Keep up these awesome videos. Love how you present the science while keeping it understandable for non-academics.
@stefanschneider3681Күн бұрын
It is always even more fun to listen to your interesting explanations when I have taken pictures of the objects out of my backyard 🤩! And I did it just with a telescope on a tracking mount and my daily dslr screwed behind it 😆. Okok, it took quite a lot of learning and getting into postprocessing like stacking and calibration frames, but at a scale that my little MacBook Air could handle it - and that fascinates me just as well!
@howardrisby9621Күн бұрын
Superb post Chris, thanks! 👍 To think we can enjoy such high resolution on an image of a feature so far away .... although I s'pose 1300 LY is a local jpb for JWST! My question is: Given the light JWST has thrown onto several theories and assumptions, which portion of the EM spectrum do you feel the next generation of space-borne instruments could most profitably investigate? Might it be the not-yet-announced successor to CHANDRA, or is something else more pressing or worthy of the sort of budget needed?
@smeeself2 күн бұрын
Fascinating. Thankyou. Another excellent post. 👍
@chrisdsouza8685Күн бұрын
Yes ❤
@mortalclown38122 күн бұрын
Still wonder what the human eye could see sans the tech used to make these heavenly bodies visible - by necessity, not design. Speaking of unseen dimensions, I'm reminded of the documentary about Dorothy Izatt's extraordinary photos. ('Capturing the Light'). The images in her still photographs and film were taken over close to a half century. Stella Lansing, on the other side of North America, are took thousands of feet of interesting and inexplicable film. Happy trails. Paz y luz ✨️ to all
@ChrisPattisonCosmo2 күн бұрын
The horse of the mane
@smeeself2 күн бұрын
😁
@pencilpauli9442Күн бұрын
Looks more like a dragon to me! lol
@user-wb3uc4oe2b4 күн бұрын
Great video thankyou , Great place to explore !
@user-yh6cw5ek1j4 күн бұрын
This might be a dumb question, but do we not think the fabric of space time exists in a higher dimension?
@ExploringNew16 күн бұрын
I wish I wasn't living near the equator. There are no seasons nor auroras.
@Nightscape_6 күн бұрын
Between rain, clouds, and light pollution, I have seen zero aurora. 😭
@russellwestproductions6 күн бұрын
The northern lights that just happened coincided with a completely public HAARP test from the 8th-10th. Coincidence?
@ethorii6 күн бұрын
Yes. It's a coincidence. Gain some knowledge on what they are. Northern lights have been documented for centuries, before electronic technology.
@russellwestproductions5 күн бұрын
@@ethorii thanks mate
@isaeva30886 күн бұрын
Great video, as always Chris! I'm always happy to see when you've uploaded 😊
@angelamusiemangela6 күн бұрын
Sei bellissimo Giacomino mio , dalla tua mamma Angela 😘😘😘😘😘😘💯💯💯, e come sempre bravissimo, bellissima tesina!
@stephenking87546 күн бұрын
I don`t get it chris why was hubble not put much further out , In the first place ? 🚀🛰🛰🌙🌞🌞🌞
@jimmywrangles6 күн бұрын
The further away it is the harder it is to fix.
@ethorii6 күн бұрын
It's a good thing it wasn't way out, because it initially was useless from a defective mirror.
@sushmitaroy9017 күн бұрын
God has left nothing to provide human just needs to look at different angle magnetic mono poles are present in form of neutrino they are of six kind y,g r and yy gg ,rr they bear charge neutral negatively and positive for better knowledge read quark hypothesis invented also propounded by me djchatterjer search in internet or in my vlog
@howardrisby96218 күн бұрын
If we want to know why 'red' is shrinking, perhaps a better starting point might be working out what caused an anticyclone that large the first place?
@PassportPowell8 күн бұрын
Nice. Might be a silly question but is the image touched up or edited in anyway? Maybe for clarity or color correct or anything else.. By you or anyone else
@ChrisPattisonCosmo8 күн бұрын
Hi! Not a silly question at all. I haven't edited the images in any way. JWST detects infrared light which we can't see, so to make images like this the infrared light always needs to be mapped in some way to colours we can see, other the image would just look blank to our eyes. This is done in a way such that the longest wavelengths of light are mapped to red colours, and the shortest to blue, to match how we see visible light colours. So yes it is not exactly true to life, but it is as close to it as possible in a way that we can actually see it. Hope that helps!
@davidwier28628 күн бұрын
For propulsion needs to be injected into an expansion chamber that has an electric arc system and allowed to expand and vent accordingly.
@stephenking87548 күн бұрын
🚀🛰🛰🌙🌞🌞🌞
@splurge47499 күн бұрын
The Great Red Spot faded completely back in the 1970s
@noelloh5619 күн бұрын
I heard they killed her 2 months after the trip lol.
Пікірлер
O wow so we have gone from big Bang theory to DARK Matter theory 😄🤡🤡🤡
Thanks for the update!
Appreciate your enthusiasm Chris - don't miss any of your posts.
What a great update on Euclid! Thank you very much. Looking forward to more Euclid and other news from you! 😍 👍
That original Hubble 'Deep Field' image reslly opened the doors for distant universe astronomy and astrophysics. Not bad for what started out as a pretty random suggestion concerning where to point that unprecedented and magnificent tool!
Sorry , last time I mentioned a few channels, I ought to have mentioned 'on a par' with Cool Worlds to :-) I find the Drake Equation a total quantative nonsense worthy of only semi sentient Earthlings. I do however find these images of a far more Qualititative nature! Your imigary conveys infinitely more than simple senile statistics :-)
Just got up (3:23AM here) and was excited to see you had a new video. Thanks!
This is where it's got it's name: www.starrywonders.com/horseheadsxvh92.jpg
Just subbed. Enjoy these explanations & images. ✨️
Didn't know about Euclid before. Rapt. Thank you.
Lovely! Goes to simply show why there are three different telescopes up there, instead of just one. Your comparison of the distance covered by VGer in relation the JWST's gorgeous image is utterly thought-provoking!
Are there plans to photograph the remainder of the horse head with JWST?
When it comes to choosing between telescopes I would not. Each has a talent, a way of 'sensing' a reality. If I am working on my engine I can see the parts but sometimes I have to close my eyes and 'see' with my fingers where intricate parts are. Touch is as important as Sight in forming a model of what I am trying to fix. We use our senses in a myriad of ways to gain a more perfect understanding. Such should be the same with telescopes, not a partiality of choice but of a truer perception.
You, Anton and Sabine are The 'go to' people for Astronomy! :-)
Wow. Love how we get to see the nebula in a wider view to place it in context then can zoom in. All three images are tops in their own right, but having all three is so much more incredible!
Perhaps create images from Euclid and Hubble the same size as JWST to compare resolutions...
I'm not sure about the horsehead. Could you please overlay a very simple drawing of the horsehead on the photo of the nebula in your next video?
❤❤❤
I'm still a Hubble fan. This is a great video showing the differences, but I still prefer Hubble's incredible textures, translucent colors, and vibe. Even this many years later Hubble images make me feel awe and wonder.
wonderful
I"ve imaged the horsehead many times and never knew there were so many galaxies behind just a small portion of it. Incredible!
Amazing to see all those galaxies behind the nebula for the first time
Spot on Chris 🚀 🛰🛰🌙 🌞🌞🌞🌞
What a beautiful video. Thank you.
7th excellent vid.....Love this stuff........hurts my head/ but LOVE IT......but but but some Sky Gawd cares what we humans do with our HooHoos'& PP's riiiiiiiight
Keep up these awesome videos. Love how you present the science while keeping it understandable for non-academics.
It is always even more fun to listen to your interesting explanations when I have taken pictures of the objects out of my backyard 🤩! And I did it just with a telescope on a tracking mount and my daily dslr screwed behind it 😆. Okok, it took quite a lot of learning and getting into postprocessing like stacking and calibration frames, but at a scale that my little MacBook Air could handle it - and that fascinates me just as well!
Superb post Chris, thanks! 👍 To think we can enjoy such high resolution on an image of a feature so far away .... although I s'pose 1300 LY is a local jpb for JWST! My question is: Given the light JWST has thrown onto several theories and assumptions, which portion of the EM spectrum do you feel the next generation of space-borne instruments could most profitably investigate? Might it be the not-yet-announced successor to CHANDRA, or is something else more pressing or worthy of the sort of budget needed?
Fascinating. Thankyou. Another excellent post. 👍
Yes ❤
Still wonder what the human eye could see sans the tech used to make these heavenly bodies visible - by necessity, not design. Speaking of unseen dimensions, I'm reminded of the documentary about Dorothy Izatt's extraordinary photos. ('Capturing the Light'). The images in her still photographs and film were taken over close to a half century. Stella Lansing, on the other side of North America, are took thousands of feet of interesting and inexplicable film. Happy trails. Paz y luz ✨️ to all
The horse of the mane
😁
Looks more like a dragon to me! lol
Great video thankyou , Great place to explore !
This might be a dumb question, but do we not think the fabric of space time exists in a higher dimension?
I wish I wasn't living near the equator. There are no seasons nor auroras.
Between rain, clouds, and light pollution, I have seen zero aurora. 😭
The northern lights that just happened coincided with a completely public HAARP test from the 8th-10th. Coincidence?
Yes. It's a coincidence. Gain some knowledge on what they are. Northern lights have been documented for centuries, before electronic technology.
@@ethorii thanks mate
Great video, as always Chris! I'm always happy to see when you've uploaded 😊
Sei bellissimo Giacomino mio , dalla tua mamma Angela 😘😘😘😘😘😘💯💯💯, e come sempre bravissimo, bellissima tesina!
I don`t get it chris why was hubble not put much further out , In the first place ? 🚀🛰🛰🌙🌞🌞🌞
The further away it is the harder it is to fix.
It's a good thing it wasn't way out, because it initially was useless from a defective mirror.
God has left nothing to provide human just needs to look at different angle magnetic mono poles are present in form of neutrino they are of six kind y,g r and yy gg ,rr they bear charge neutral negatively and positive for better knowledge read quark hypothesis invented also propounded by me djchatterjer search in internet or in my vlog
If we want to know why 'red' is shrinking, perhaps a better starting point might be working out what caused an anticyclone that large the first place?
Nice. Might be a silly question but is the image touched up or edited in anyway? Maybe for clarity or color correct or anything else.. By you or anyone else
Hi! Not a silly question at all. I haven't edited the images in any way. JWST detects infrared light which we can't see, so to make images like this the infrared light always needs to be mapped in some way to colours we can see, other the image would just look blank to our eyes. This is done in a way such that the longest wavelengths of light are mapped to red colours, and the shortest to blue, to match how we see visible light colours. So yes it is not exactly true to life, but it is as close to it as possible in a way that we can actually see it. Hope that helps!
For propulsion needs to be injected into an expansion chamber that has an electric arc system and allowed to expand and vent accordingly.
🚀🛰🛰🌙🌞🌞🌞
The Great Red Spot faded completely back in the 1970s
I heard they killed her 2 months after the trip lol.