Extraordinary claims require (demand) extraordinary evidence. Absolutely spot on, Chris

When I first heard about the UAP hearings on Event Horizon, I questioned my skepticism on aliens having ever been to Earth. Now, after watching these hearings and seeing nothing but hearsay, sketchy documents, and no scientific evidence, I am even more convinced we are the only technologically advanced species within ten billion lightyears. But do want increased funding for atmospheric sciences.

Thanks as always Chris! Keep it up 💪❤

Nice one chris 🚀🛰🛰🌙🌞🌞🌞

As always, your great presentation help us astronomy layman so much! Thanks! Thanks! Thanks!❤

Well they did change the name of UFO to UAP

Skepticism and it's superiority complex.😂😂😂

Instead of launching new observatories.

Because my UFO videos have real UFO they don’t want you guys to know that I’ve got the smoking gun

no worries it's just us come back from the future

0:12 Mick West clearly and plainly explained this exact footage. 3:30 I mean, NASA isn't denying that there could be aliens out there. But people need to think things through when it comes to how far they have to travel (imagine the technology required!), only to be so F-ING incompetent to be seen by us when we shouldn't see them. 5:04 Given the technology WE have today, why are most of the sightings still blurry as hell or only a few seconds long? And why are they always so far away? If they're common enough, why aren't any WAY closer? This is akin to someone setting off fireworks a few blocks away, and concluding it has to be gunfire. At least NASA is doing this. People who claim we're constantly being visited by aliens tell us to use critical thinking. I say, "You first." 8:46 Those plaster forms are pathetic. Definitely made by someone who doesn't have a handle on biology. 9:04 Other than stereo eyes (sorry but that seems to be a go-to with nature), you have to think about the practicality of how a body is put together before claiming aliens wouldn't look at all like us. To say they'd only have one leg, or three legs (why?), I think we should be speculating that far.

In my opinion… 99% of these alien sightings can be explained away / total bollocks. And the remaining 1% is “interesting” 👍👍👍

So they caught E.T. after all. I guess they didn't leave that part in the movie.

Re: the 'bodies' from Peru: - I agree with you that finding DNA at all sounds suspicious. Also, our genetic code and amino acid repertoire has evolved over time, so testing these bodies' DNA might reveal whether it matches any of the changes we know happened on Earth. Simply being bilateral isn't suspicious though, as there aren't too many alternatives. On Earth there is radial symmetry and pentamerous symmetry, but even cephalopods are bilaterally symmetrical. Eyes are also a slam dunk In a universe where the electromagnetic force (light) dominates. Cephalisation too seems likely, - but note the cephalopods! Where it starts to get improbable though, is in other aspects of bone structure, such as ribs, clavicle, scapulae, and even the number of limbs and the bones within them. Taking these points together, I think these are mummified children or other young primates.

Gov...aint gonna tell shiznit

@smeeself

9 ай бұрын

KZread commenters aren't going to use recognisable language.

When there is NASA written in any video, I skip - as I will do now.

@smeeself

9 ай бұрын

🤣 Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

I expected the NASA report to be skeptical but not so much from you.. unsubbed. Byeeee...