Radar DOES NOT use "sound waves," as this episode states roughly 6 minutes and 40 seconds into this video. Instead, Radar uses RADIO WAVES!!! 😂

@christianschneider1235

Ай бұрын

Hey according to Freddie Mercury radio is GAGA and makes noises. And that's sound! So stop being a hater 😂

@user-jv7rn6ux1j

Ай бұрын

RADAR is literally an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging😂

@xTheUnderscorex

Ай бұрын

Still far from the biggest inaccuracy in this video. Hell it's not even the only weird reference to sound, a few seconds earlier it mentioned overcoming SONAR. The density of errors in the video is rather astonishing, it actually might so bad that ChatGPT would have done better.

@user-hg9fl7ep1v

Ай бұрын

True

@fleshreap

Ай бұрын

Videos on this channel often have bad inaccuracies. They don't seem to care much.

Stating the F22 lost dog fights to the F15 glosses over a lot of constraints the F22 pilot had to follow to due to training requirements and preserving RAM.

@FloridaManMatty

Ай бұрын

Facts. The F-22s and F-35s are almost always stacked with lunberg reflectors and the external fuel tanks to make them much easier to see and harder to maneuver. They’re usually tied down with VERY limited intercept constraints and I’ve read that there have been exercises where the 4th Gen fighters are intercepting 10-20:1 with AWACS and other support and the F-22 and F-35s are purposely seriously hamstrung.

@lafosh7234

Ай бұрын

I don’t know why people think these F22 and F35 are at full capability when doing these little DF shows and training

@davidford3115

Ай бұрын

@@FloridaManMatty The F-35 is experiencing the same doctrinal issues that were realized with the F-4 Phantom in Vietnam: Jack of all, Master of None. There IS a reason why the USAF has desperately tried to hide the after-action report of the Red Flag Exercise where a Gripen defeated the F-35.

@McNubbys

Ай бұрын

You learn more from a loss than a win.

@user-zb9lv3gh8s

Ай бұрын

That's the point exactly. They handicap the F22 till it's competitive with the older plane, then see what happens.

The SU57 is soviet style hype. It’s a flying Fyre Festival.

@jonmueller2117

Ай бұрын

It barely flies and is being compared to the 50 year old Eagle.

@gooldii1

Ай бұрын

Like everything from this Terrorstate. Terminator, t90, t80, t72, su35, S300, allll crap

@dickfitzwelliner2807

Ай бұрын

Ohhh dude that is a good comparison, it's funny too

@Booz2020

Ай бұрын

Slava TSMC 🇹🇼

@SeanRea-eu7tz

Ай бұрын

God damn, that might be the most accurate summary of the Russian (airforce/army/navy/anything) capabilities I have heard.

Russia is not scaring anyone. That new F15 EX is something they should worry about.

@Canoby

Ай бұрын

I think it's hilarious (also, awesome) that we can revisit an older design like the F-15 and just modernize a few parts of it, and it's at least as effective as a brand-new design. Goes to show you how well designed the F-15 was/is.

@janhansen3753

Ай бұрын

I don't think Russia is thinking twice about a plane which primary role will be domestic defence. The F-22 and F-35 is what they fear.

@lafosh7234

Ай бұрын

@@janhansen3753actually….the F15 especially the EX would serve as second hand damage after the stealth jets came in and destroyed land to air threats that could lock them up

@davidford3115

Ай бұрын

@@janhansen3753 The F-35 is suffering from the same problem that the F-4 Phantom experienced in Vietnam. Jack of all Trades, Master of None. Seems like Western leaders go in a cycle where they think they need a multi-purpose vehicle only to come to the same realization of previous generations that having dedicated frames for a specific purpose is more effective. What they should be looking for is NOT multi-purpose aircraft, but rather PARTS inter-operability.

@bucky5869

Ай бұрын

​@lafosh7234 the F-15EX will be the F-35s missile truck. Think of it as an an extended mag for the 5th gen.

"F22 does not have any serious victories in air to air combat"....... That baloon was pretty jacked though.

The fact that Russia is nervous says a lot, they don’t think their best fighter can handle the American jet

@lafosh7234

Ай бұрын

They always knew that..that’s why there military doctrine focuses on quantity versus quality

@quandmeme9970

Ай бұрын

​@@lafosh7234problem for Russia that US has both. 😂

@lafosh7234

Ай бұрын

@@quandmeme9970 problem for Russia and maybe China if they feeling frisky is the shit we don’t see or hear about on the news…it’s them secret weapons department in our government folks should be worried about

@merschy

Ай бұрын

Wo hast du denn das gelesen , die Mig 29 hat das lumpige Teil schon platt gemacht im Jugoslawienkrieg 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@drpepper3838

Ай бұрын

Nervous?😂 nato is losing

104 and 0. (stats for the F15) vs 0 and -4 (stats for the SU57)

@John-hu9qg

Ай бұрын

Against 3 generation export aircraft in third world countries, let's not forget.

@michaelbartley9572

Ай бұрын

⁠@@John-hu9qgthat ain’t true. 1 f15 shot down 2 mig29s and Iraq definitely wasn’t a third world military. It’s was 4th largest military on earth. The f15 has shit down multiple mig 29s. The f15 is older I believe than the mig. The f15 could take out most of Russias Air Force as it’s mostly made up of mig29s and su27s. I’d put my money on the f15ex against the su35 as it’s performed pretty bad in Ukraine. Not to mention the huge difference in pilots and training. If the US loses just 1 fighter it’s a big deal and Russian jets been faking like rain. They took out 11 in 11 days.

@John-hu9qg

Ай бұрын

@@michaelbartley9572 It shot down a couple of elderly Iraqi MIG-29A export variants, in a 4 vs 1 engagement with full NATO AWACSs support vs nothing on the Iraqi side, Iraq most definitely had a third world military in every sense of the word, that was tired from 10 years of the iran-iraq war before the gulf war in 1991. They didn't even possess a single round of ammunition designed to engage western armour!🤣. The Ukrainian airforce was largely combat ineffective in as little as 10 days, and you will see exactly how long the F-16 will last also. In regards to Ukrainian shoot down claims? They were laughable at best, they couldn't provide any evidence whatsoever in relation to the majority of SU-34 claims, yes they downed one or two by quietly bringing a pair of patriot launchers and a NASAM unit forward, but then lost all three SAM units in a series of spectacular strikes by the Russians who also moved a relatively unknown weapon into position, a Tornado 200km range precision strike MLRS. Its also rumoured that some of these destroyed battery's were covertly manned by American and other NATO personnel killed in the strikes.

@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb

Ай бұрын

Iraq was still ranked 4th in the world for military power at the time with on of the best air defense in the world,

@John-hu9qg

Ай бұрын

@@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb Totally false, their air defence systems were based on equipment from the 60s and 70s, almost all of it, the non double digit stuff previously compromised from the Arab-Israeli wars decades earlier. The US even received some captured examples, radars etc from Israel. The only area that Iraq had any credible threat was their artillery but without control of their airspace that threat was quickly neutralised.

You really don't understand infra-red do you?

I stopped watching when Radar was referred to as sound waves and sonar was apparently used to detect air planes lol.

@dbolt6543

Ай бұрын

So true, SONAR vs RADAR

Turned this off the moment the narrator said that radar operates on sound waves....

@Booz2020

Ай бұрын

Dassault Rafale: Slava 🥖

@Talven81

Ай бұрын

Brings everything else that was said into question. Just started watching this channel, unsubscribed.

@ghansu

Ай бұрын

Well sonar and radar kind of works same way. No biggie that orher wave moves speed of light and other about 1 235 km/h. in air. Not to make too much fuss about the fact that planes dont usually travel under water where sonars are used.@@Talven81

@chrisdejonge611

Ай бұрын

Yep, same. The bullshit about thermal vs infrared and the aircraft actively illuminating in infrared is also complete and utter bullocks. Actually, everything is in this video is bullocks. Yes, the F-15 will be a match for the SU-35, but for completely different reasons than the bull** in this video.

@Theguyinthefez

Ай бұрын

This “guy” is using ChatGPT for his script and likely paying someone for the narration. Every single video is like this. Just a simple regurgitation of the Wikipedia articles the LLM was trained on.

Always loved the F-15 Eagle. Simply the best ever.👏

@Andrew-ih2gz

Ай бұрын

Now give it crack and stealth tech and you have the f-22 raptor. We don't even need to use the f-22.

@charlesgay-ms6yt

Ай бұрын

Yep

@Booz2020

Ай бұрын

Dassault Rafale: Slava 🥖

@charlesgay-ms6yt

Ай бұрын

@@Booz2020 the Eagle, 104_ 0

@rub-al-khali4265

Ай бұрын

@@Booz2020 Rafale is a beautiful and great plane, but it doesn't have the record or history as the F-15. Maybe it will later in time.

The F15 has the most amazing radar, it will see an SU 57 from a long ways off.

You really need to get a script editor in with a decent grasp of science, particularly physics. Your description of radar is... not how radar works at all. Radar is an electromagnetic wave, not a sound wave. This hugely holes the credibility of what is already a very ropey script. As a channel with over 3/4 of a million subscribers I would expect you can afford a decent script writer or editor. If you don't have one of those, drop me a line and I'll come sort it out for you for a reasonable fee :D

@stevenwinklepleck8395

Ай бұрын

That had me raising my eyebrows, too lol... I was like... sound waves? That's sonar, not radar! lol

@aber978

Ай бұрын

they use a bot to write and read the script the ia has made, i doubt if there is even someone that has listened to that thing befire dumping it in the internet.

@ecleveland1

Ай бұрын

What about airplanes being built so they can hide from SONAR? I hope we don’t have flying submarines. Or jet fighters that can fly underwater. The video creator made a wealth of mistakes in this video.

@pnwdrifter5680

Ай бұрын

@@ecleveland1 ruzzia just converted a su27 into a submarine.

@samsonkong4906

Ай бұрын

Lol and "inferred is not to be confused with thermal"

Russians talking about 6th gen but haven't even produced a true 5th gen yet.

25% of the imagery used in this video is incorrect. You are diseminating information that is incorrect.

@richardzelade

Ай бұрын

Yes, but you need to perfect your spelling, i.e., disseminating. 😉

@yereverluvinuncleber

Ай бұрын

@@richardzelade Quite right. When I'm typing on an old Dell E6410 with a wobbly keyboard, tiny deviations can be forgiven. If the mistakes in imagery in this video were of the same scale, they would be forgiven.

Pretty sure you confused radar with sonar here (6:47)

@travisinthetrunk

Ай бұрын

Yup. Radar doesn’t detect sound waves.

@reqq47

Ай бұрын

There's also some heavy "artistic liberties" used from 13:00 onwards when the IR is discussed.

@hanrockabrand95

Ай бұрын

"Sir! Radar just pinged off of a sonic boom in sector G7!"

@user-jv7rn6ux1j

Ай бұрын

RADAR is literally an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging😂

Go ahead Pooty, send in your T-14s and SU-57s. Afraid they'll become burning scrap?

It’s not the plane it’s the pilot....

@user-zb9lv3gh8s

Ай бұрын

We have much better pilots too so...

@ericpatten6204

Ай бұрын

I mean if one of the pilots is in an American plane and one is in a shitty Russian one it really is more about the plane

Radar using sound waves??? If you can't even get this right, your credibility is zero.

@dennythedavinchi3832

Ай бұрын

He mentioned sonar in airfigter topic. I don't think he knows what's he talking about.

@user-jv7rn6ux1j

Ай бұрын

Yeah RADAR is literally an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging. The guy is confused and not as knowledgeable as he should be 🤦

@Juho-uf8si

Ай бұрын

this channel isnt exactly for bright minded people, its to please US army fanbois that eat this shit like candy.

@helpmedaddyjesus7099

Ай бұрын

​@@dennythedavinchi3832 sound has been used in early detection systems before, and then they invented radar and it was instantly replaced

And still, the su57 is really huge and you can see the turbine blades from the front.. that is really not Stealth no matter how much ram you paint it with

@omniman9861

Ай бұрын

What if they shove RAM down the intakes? Like.... So the engines eat it... Have stealth farts then too

@worldoftancraft

Ай бұрын

First what is the number of the Su-57, you are talking about? Literally there many iterations of this plane with significant differences. SUCH AS RAM blockers before the blades.

Not necessarily the F-16, even the upgraded F-4 phantom can still destroy the Su57 easily. su57 is just like su27 but different design

Man, IR vs thermal imaging is most likely written by someone who has no clue.

“Horsepower and gunpowder”

"Windmills do not work that way! Goodnight!"

Multiple mistakes in this video: 1. Radar does not work off sound waves. 2. The F-15EX is the "missile truck" model. Not the F-15C. 3. The F-35 is equipped with the 25mm GAU-12/U rotary cannon, not the M61A2. Seriously, do a bit of fact-checking on your researchers before this stuff goes live.

The new fly by wire on the F-15X makes them crazy maneuverable

the russian military estimated the RCS of the SU-57 is 100 times bigger than the proven RCS of the F-22

@DarthAwar

Ай бұрын

True but even the US cant currently build anything that can match the F-22 or even new F-22 also the SU-57 is their first compared to the US's (115 Night Hawk!) it's much better but yes it sucks it was 25 year late and based on an existing airframe (The Flanker!) rather than build new from the ground up, Also the SU-57 still lacks it's dedicated new engines Best Stealth Aircraft ever built was the VF-23 (Black Widow and Ghost Bat!) they were more stealthy just as fast but lost because they didn't show off fancy moves it was capable of and still was (for the prototypes!) Analog Majority Controls but was planned to get a fully Digital Cockpit and HUD Helmet

@pooferfish2850

Ай бұрын

@@DarthAwar NGAD?

@DarthAwar

Ай бұрын

Show me the plane you cant as it is not even in testing yet never mind production it might never happen (It will but until it's actually in mass production it should be treated as Vapor Wear!) why fight a real war with Hypothetical Resources you can't just with what you have right at that moment! @@pooferfish2850

@Wyomingchief

Ай бұрын

​@DarthAwar what the hell are you even talking about? The F-35 is more stealthy than the f-22. The F-22 was our third attempt at stealth. Actually our first attempt at a stealth aircraft was the Have-Blue test bed which is 100 * stealthier than the su-57. Our first production stealth aircraft was the F-117 Nighthawk. Not sure where you're coming up with the F-115😂😂😂 And the second production aircraft with stealth was the F-22 which is several Generations beyond the f-117. And the current F-35 along with the B21 Raider are even further stealthier than the F-22 or any previous aircraft. And for the su-57 to be Russia's first attempt at stealth is actually quite embarrassing. Because it's not even a stealth aircraft it's barely low observability. In fact it may not even be low observable, some estimates are that it has the radar cross section of a slick f-18.😂 And as far as the video goes, the su-57 if they ever are able to produce a combat version of it that's really ready, wouldn't stand a chance. Also it's very doubtful that they'll ever even build any more of them because they lack the Western components to build them. They are not capable of manufacturing the microchips along with dozens of other components on their own😂😂

@Wyomingchief

Ай бұрын

​@@DarthAwar😂😂😂😂😂😂

The F-15 EX are brand new airframes, It isn't an upgrade to preexisting aircraft, they are a cheaper option then stealth air craft but designed to integrate with them.

@Booz2020

Ай бұрын

Dassault Rafale: hold our 🥖 please 😎

@Wyomingchief

Ай бұрын

Well first of all you're right they are brand new airframes but they are a 100% upgraded design. And no they're not cheap, in fact unless we buy more than the current 18 we have ordered they will not be cheaper than the F-35

It's easy to do (I guess) but @9:00 in, those are not MiG-25 Foxbats. Those are MiG-31 Foxhounds.

The F22 is the scariest thing with wings since the Cretaceous Period.

@zacharybanks7530

3 күн бұрын

Have you ever seen a peregrine falcon

Long story short Russia lags behind 3 decades.

@MikeOxlong-

Ай бұрын

and soon to be 5. 😂

@gooldii1

Ай бұрын

Exactly.

@Booz2020

Ай бұрын

Dassault Rafale: Slava 🥖

The value of a weapon system is NEVER best determined by 1 on 1 scenarios. No one, not even Russia, sends up aircraft for one-on-one duels unsupported. There is a lot of other factors involved. Aerial refueling to enhance combat endurance, airborne and ground based radar support, SAM support, EW support, pilot training, and even quality of basic maintenance matter. In this case, the Su-57s go up looking for F-15s who may be easily detected at range.... and as they maneuver around to get the F-15s they get bushwacked by the F-22s or F-35s they never saw. Then the F-15s volley off their long-range missile load to mop up any survivors. Or the F-22s and F-35s can remain covert and provide targeting data for the F-15EX's massive missile load, then come in and sweep up anything left.

@worldoftancraft

Ай бұрын

F-22 is the plane that disappears in history. Less ready than 50 years old f-15.

@ajalvarez3111

3 күн бұрын

The F-15 remains a credible threat BECAUSE of the F35 and F22.

The SU-57 is not a 5th gen aircraft. It is at best a 4.5. And it's not Stealth either, its stealth adjacent.

@user-zb9lv3gh8s

Ай бұрын

It's stealth-ish!

Aside from bombing a few safe targets in Syria, all we really know about the SU-57 is what Russian sources brag about. A lot of creditability there. Whereas the capability of the F-15 is documented by 40 years of combat action by the USAF and several allied countries.

I love the stock F-16 footage while talking about how great the F-15 is…

G O A T : 104 - 0 🔥❤️ Even, Mike Tyson : 50 - 6 😁

Gotta avoid that sonar detection!

This ain't Hollywood buddy and all your pilots are not tom cruise either

@nobodyknows3180

Ай бұрын

And Su-57 ISN'T 5th Generation and ISN'T stealth, so no, we don't need Hollywood OR Tom Cruise. Also, we rely on the fact that there is only about 4-5 flying Su-57's in the world anyway.

This has got to be a response to the meme “Release the Eagle” [Hellsing intensifies] _FETCH ME THEIR SOULS!!!_

Just a hypothetical question - in each sense. In reality the scrap jet Su-57 not even exists. 14 years after the first flight, just a handful of Su-57 jets have been produced which are all different. The jet is a joke.

Who does the fact checking on this? Radar does not use sound waves. It is an acronym for radio detection and ranging. Radio Waves propagate at the speed of light not the speed of sound. Infrared detection from IRST is completely passive. Nothing is sent out. We aren't talking about the 1950s and 1960s infrared lamps used by tanks. Finally, there's a serious question as to whether the Sukhoi Su 57 is a true 5th generation aircraft. It has a lot of non-stealthy angles and those engine inlets look rather suspect.

It seems like you're reading the factory sales literature for the SU-57 and actually believe it. Here's a hint: No outside source has vetted the claims or capabilities. In contrast, the 20 year old F-22 has participated in scores of mock dogfights against top of the line fighters from NATO countries and other allies in week long training exercises. To put it very mildly, Russia is known for exaggerating the capabilities of its weapons and vehicles. The SU-57, T-14 and BMPT "Terminator" are made for parades and shopping mall openings as each of their miniscule production numbers indicate.

@worldoftancraft

Ай бұрын

While the US does not a country, learned the word «advertising»? "Publical" articles where F-22 RCS is times of magnite lower than F-117 is rudicilous. Yet you belive.

@red94mr28

Ай бұрын

@@worldoftancraft Wow, English much? Or does incoherency run in your family?

@worldoftancraft

Ай бұрын

@@red94mr28 if I replaced "aren't being" with "doesn't" because something broke in the thinking process, it doesn't make the message senseless. You can continue shifting away from the topic, mr Ad

@red94mr28

Ай бұрын

@@worldoftancraft Sniffing glue is very bad for you. It causes hallucinations, like referencing "aren't being" when it doesn't appear in your post above. Try to avoid huffing it in the future.

@worldoftancraft

Ай бұрын

@@red94mr28 you are really that dull that you present my description of the error, what I wrote and what I should've instead, as a hallicilation? You really this much taskless that you have time for this? You humuliate yourself by the very yourselves deeds.

No reason to retire this aircraft, ever. IMHO, the best ever built.

Lol can anyone else remember before the war people were asking if the su57 could go nose to nose with F22s and F35s lol 😊

Very nice piece on individual pieces of tech. 👍

It's so stealthy it's never been seen in actual combat, or flying in a combat zone. It's a Potemkin display fighter.

If you think radar uses sound waves, I don't think you are qualified to speak about anything in this video. Unsubscribed.

nice video, but: - RADAR does not run on sound waves, but rather radio waves (in the cm and mm range). The ECHOLOT works with sound waves, which was first used by the British in WW2 against German submarines. - There are 2 infrared/thermal imaging systems. Active and passive. In one case, the battlefield is illuminated and the reflection is registered by a sensor. This was first used by the Germans in WW2. The next generation does not need any illumination, but rather registers the (long-wave) infrared signature that the object emits. This is probably also what is meant here, in order to register the signature of the engine, even if the aircraft is not detected by the radar. In principle, stealth aircraft are not entirely invisible. In Yugoslavia and also in Iraq, F117s were found and combated by long-wave radar devices (cm range) (older system from the USSR). The German company Hensold is building a similar radar that can find stealth aircraft sooner.

The F15, is getting a face-lift and going to be in service for a couple more decades. Fact of the matter is the only plane that can beat the f-15 in the sky today is the f-15 and the F22 and F35. America's design it's still outstanding that we designed a plane 40 years ago that has only been matched by newer American planes 🤣

@mj_slender6717

Ай бұрын

From what I have heard or read, it's the best as far as thrust to weight. Or climb rate. Something of that sort. Can't remember exactly what it was?????

@worldoftancraft

Ай бұрын

Saying that F-15 is unbeatable is a one of the most arrogant signature of a true American patriot(beer drinker+tv watcher type)

@robertgarcia217

Ай бұрын

@@worldoftancraft it kill record is 104-0. Its a fact not a boast. Whats your nationality?

@robertgarcia217

Ай бұрын

@@mj_slender6717 yes and yes. Also only jet to kill a satellite. Look it up👍

@worldoftancraft

Ай бұрын

@@robertgarcia217 if you cannot get the mesage, I can use even more simple English: unbeatED =/= unbeatABLE. Can you grasp the difference? I am Rossiânin.

The AIM260 being produced soon coupled with the F-15EX radar is going to be super sweet!

0:30 Why did the American jet attack the UK?

@murphychris9811

Ай бұрын

they hate us thats why

@Judes_Austrio-German_Empire

Ай бұрын

Because it's the British they wont forgive them for the burning of the white house in 1812

The fact a upgrade fighter from the 70's can even compete with a 2020 fighter from Russia is laughable and a testament to USA air power.

When the narrator said that radar is a sound wave, I knew this would be somewhat false information. F-15 would win assuming it can see the SU-57.

You forget to point out that almost every USSR/Russian weapon system of the last 40 years has performed well below what its paper specifications say they should.

Russian incompetence is why I sleep so well at night.

Imagine updating F-15B/D so the WSO issues commands to a drone wing. But I guess the stealthy F-35 is better suited for that role

@BurntOrangeHorn78

Ай бұрын

As is also the F15EX.

@hanrockabrand95

Ай бұрын

@@BurntOrangeHorn78 The EX is single-seat. I think a backseat driver would be optimal for controlling the drones while the pilot focuses on flying

@BurntOrangeHorn78

Ай бұрын

@@hanrockabrand95 F15EX is dual tandem seat.

@hanrockabrand95

Ай бұрын

@@BurntOrangeHorn78 I stand corrected

@Wyomingchief

Ай бұрын

Actually the f-15ex will have both single seat and dual configurations. But the single seat F-15 will still have the same cockpit area the second seat will not be utilized. Also all the other f-15s we have currently, will be aging out within the next 5 to 10 years max. So you can't even upgrade them because the airframes will be worn out

I bet the SU-57 is good at hiding from sonar...in the sky

Very interesting analysis ! Thanks

I have said it once and I will say it again, a visually impaired 4 year old running around a F16 hanger with a slightly pointy stick is only slightly less dangerous than a SU57 is to a F16. At least the 4 year old has a chance to whack the landing gear with said stick!

@janhansen3753

Ай бұрын

Depends on where they meet. As it is the case with all such dumb comparison videos.

Did you come up with this story yourself? or did someone help you? 😆

@deleted_215

Ай бұрын

This guy definitely uses AI. How he thinks radar uses sound waves is beyond me. I bet $20 this guy has no clue what he’s talking about 99% of the time

@chrisdejonge611

Ай бұрын

I think this whole video is AI generated, including the script and the generation of the voice.

When Russia brags about their aircraft… forgive me if I don’t believe you, Comrade

The SU57 is only stealthy nose on. If there is an AWACS in the area the SU57 doesn't have a chance because the AWACS can relay positional information to any allied aircraft. This will give the F35 the ability to engage the SU57 from another zip code.

Go back to school mr.Bean, it's hilarious to hear radar emiting sound waves

unbelievable! The Military Show finally makes good, factually accurate relevant video.

@xTheUnderscorex

Ай бұрын

Really? Where is it?

Radar=sound waves.....muhgawd

Please stop scaring russians. Getting tons of email "hey bro, so scared of the f15"

I bet MY lunch the F15 would eat the Su-57 for lunch. Granted it would be a very quick diety lunch because they ain't much SU-57s available. 😂

@nobodyknows3180

Ай бұрын

More like an appetizer than a meal.

The Beatles forever ♾️

The SU-57 is not very stealthy. Both the F-35 and the F-22 can detect the SU-57 long before it can detect them.

@davidford3115

Ай бұрын

Most people misunderstand Stealth to begin with. It has less to do with being "invisible" and more to do with being able to acquire a targeting lock. The non-stealthy aircraft can still see the stealth but has to get much closer before his weapons can effectively hit their target.

@Wyomingchief

Ай бұрын

😮 no you're actually incorrect. Stealth has to do with being unseen to the other aircraft radars. You can't see it without getting a radar lock on it basically. Now there are some ground-based x-band Radars that can detect that a stealth aircraft is in the area but it cannot pinpoint it with any degree of accuracy, not even really accurate enough to Vector another aircraft to that area

@Wyomingchief

Ай бұрын

​@@davidford3115yeah you are completely misunderstanding stealth technology yourself

@davidford3115

Ай бұрын

@@Wyomingchief Air traffic control radars at airports can see stealth aircraft just fine. They don't need to have a weapon's lock and so the accuracy of where they plot the location of an aircraft doesn't need to be so precise. And yes, vectoring an intercepting aircraft CAN be done with such a radar.

It's not "shukoi", it's "sukhoi"

RADAR is not sound waves, but radio waves of different frequencies, depending on what you want to "see".

There is something ironic with people saying that the Russian Stealth Fighter (SU-57) hasn't been seen in Ukraine yet.

US F-15s are not carrying AIM-9L or M’s anymore, they have all been upgraded with the high off borsight and advanced AIM-9X Making use of the helmet mounted queueing system.

Sonar? That’s worse than accidentally saying radar uses sound.

As with the Radar comment confusing sound with radio wave. This video describes Infra-Red as a radio. Talking about IR emitters that bounce IR off other plains? IR is detected passively as an emission from another object. It is not bounced off the object like RADAR or SONAR.

Russia's actions with the SU-57, remind me of Saddam husseins in hiding his jets in gulf wars

Sound waves would be a sonar system, Radar uses radio waves 6:50

The SU-57 isn't stealth. It has a radar cross section of a SQUARE METER, about the same as an F-18A. That's not stealth. The F-35 has a cross section of .005 square meters. THAT'S stealth.

@cfisher11

Ай бұрын

F35 is stealthy against Radar using X band frequency, it is not stealthy against Radar in the S band which AWACS and ground control Radars operate in

@OrdinaryDude

Ай бұрын

@@cfisher11 But the resolution is so bad that they can't use it for targeting or even accurate location. They know it's out there, but not exactly where.

Russian pilots have more flight experience in Microsoft flight simulator. Than in an actually fighter jet 😂

The SU57 will be as competent as every other bit of military kit that has been designed and built in Russia. 😂

Sadly the F22 is design against that sensor already

Why only a brief mention about the F15-EX Eagle 2?

@dennythedavinchi3832

Ай бұрын

He's just simple American nationalist. Can't distinguish SONAR and RADAR.

@6:50 "radar uses sound waves".. no Sonar uses Sound waves, Radar uses Radiation waves, Electromagnetic Waves..

Flew both can confirm im lying

I thought the F-35 carried the GAU-22 25mm gun not the M-61 20mm?

hell yeh f-15 still king of the sky.

F15EX says HELLO!

@ 6:50.....RADAR uses radio waves, not sound waves.

As long as they only have 9 or anything less than 50 of those SU-57s, they are pretty much irrelevant.

The reason you don't see the su-57 in combat is very simple. It doesn't work

The Russian Military expert said that "the SU-57 has left the US rival far behind." That may be the funniest and most detached from reality comment from a Russian military expert I ever heard. That's amazing because the pool of detached from reality comments is enormous, extremely dense and old as Russia itself. Now I have to clean coffee off my monitor.

"F15 never lost a dogfight... " Tell that to the British Sea Harrier pilots that kicked its arse in multiple (radar/Digital monitored) engagements. The kill ratio average of the Royal Navy Sea Harrier against the F15 was 3 to 1. Sharkey Wards personal ratio was 20+ to 1.

Yeah well we gotta see su57s on the battlefield first 😂

This is in large part a numbers game. How many F15’s can be brought to bear vs SU57? The number of SU57’s is so low, it is pretty much a non factor in any prolonged war.

@nobodyknows3180

Ай бұрын

21. That is the total number of Su-57's built. And most of them were non-flying test prototypes.

@sidlives2672

Ай бұрын

@@nobodyknows3180my point exactly. But thanks for the stat.

Does anyone else feel like we give a little bit too much information to our enemies? I do

no plane is immune now

He failed to mention the newer visions of the f-15e/ ex… f-15c is old like desert storm old..

flying T-14

I would love to hear your reaction tou "Against the Wind" by Bob Seger

Radar has nothing to do with sound waves which travel at the speed of sound. Radar waves travel at the speed of light. After hearing that, you seem illegitimate.