It's best to never underestimate your enemy. Plan for them to be capable and you might be pleasantly surprised to find they're not.

@dennylukman1801

21 күн бұрын

That paranoid mindset is what making US old arsenal proving their point in Ukraine hands, and make them victor of the cold war.

@tafarid.7347

20 күн бұрын

The US did that already. Russia made the MIG 25 and the US got scared. Their response? The F-15 Eagle.

@charlesrichardson8635

15 күн бұрын

Once proven to bluff a lot, you can't always play this way, since the bluff is to blunt your advantage. You test it. Yes, it may cost, but you test it. Otherwise they get an advantage at NO cost. Türkiye found this out the hard way!

@mingkwong9277

9 күн бұрын

S400 is a joke....can't even protect itself in Ukraine

S400 also has a "return to sender" mode.

@spencerstevens2175

Ай бұрын

What lol

@Nickname-ef9tv

Ай бұрын

@@spencerstevens2175There is a video from the Russian-Ukrainian War of an S400 missile flying straight back at the S400.

@Damien.D

Ай бұрын

​@@spencerstevens2175there is a video of a Russian SAM launcher getting destroyed by its own missile, that did a u-turn... Pure cartoon comedy. S400, proudly made by ACME Manufacturing Company.

@spencerstevens2175

Ай бұрын

@@Damien.D ah I thought you meant it could send stuff back launched by adversaries

@robertdaly4387

Ай бұрын

The return to sender mode is a free upgrade for S400

Russian hardware is NEVER as good as it states on paper, has been this way for 100 or so years.

@wojciech_leszczynski

Ай бұрын

Spot on

@Bababoy6969

Ай бұрын

Same as the US☠️

@johnd.7792

Ай бұрын

Generally speaking, the USA tends to be better than what is on paper. We are not the same.

@slavcpanigaz846

Ай бұрын

@@defcreator187😂😂😂

@Bababoy6969

Ай бұрын

@@johnd.7792 hmm the how come usa hasn't won a war alone since ww2?

The problem with those low frequency radars is that you might was well hang sign saying “target HARM missile here”

@Johnnycdrums

Ай бұрын

You need to scan through the low frequency's in order to pick up stealth aircraft and missiles. I think an SPS-48 (old or new, can pick up and track stealth). But can the FT's lock on without losing them if they turn? Throw bad weather into the mix and it might get king of hairy.

@alexsokolovsky1873

Ай бұрын

Harm missiles aren't effective against scan array raidars. Wich is a search raider on a modern air defense system. That's how they track and target so many targets simultaneously, they only illuminate each momentary. Not enough signal to lock on.

@panan7777

Ай бұрын

@@Johnnycdrums HAARM WILL lock....

@Johnnycdrums

Ай бұрын

@@panan7777 ; If you inhibit your air aquisistion radar from scanning through all the frequency's, you are degrading it. There is a doctrine for shutting off all transmitters (don't forget transponders), hidding behind an island somewhere, and then when given the order, light off everything you got, fully realizing the enemy now knows who, and target bearing at minimum.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

HARM missiles are immune to interception?

The Russians also said their tanks can withstand a nuclear blast, but a 3k drone is destroying them in Ukraine 😂

@wojciech_leszczynski

Ай бұрын

Russian fanboys: "we have intercepted your drone with our tank! You were so naive ! Victory will be a matter of minutes"

@thephoenix756

Ай бұрын

Never said

@wilinstonthompson1352

Ай бұрын

3k ? More like 3 pounds

@mozes1745

Ай бұрын

Never underestimate the Russians, look and read what happened with Napoleon and his army and the arrogance from Hitler.

@wilinstonthompson1352

Ай бұрын

@@mozes1745 Yeah he whooped Russian but then ran out of food in the winter . Germans whooped Russian butt until several non Russian army factors , Afghans stomped a hole in their butt ( in k.i.a terms) . And now an army they had an over 10 to advantage against is making them the literal laughing stock of the world. Russians better watch their eastern borders with China , because I'm sure it's looking like a real easy target now .

I don't think the S-400 is a joke, rather I think it is just old. Its tech was designed over 30 years ago, its S-300 legacy components are even older. It was built to counter a threat environment which looked fundamentally different from the modern battlefield.

@charlesrichardson8635

15 күн бұрын

I would agree. It is a decent system again old tech platforms and poorly trained pilots. That may apply in many places in the world. But Türkiye should have known better! They had access to NATO evaluations.

@spartanconscience2693

10 күн бұрын

And the patriot system is not the same age? They had them in the first Gulf war in 1990 and it was disappointing to say the least.

Russia: we’ve built the best air defence system!* *on paper

@ludviglarsson1702

Ай бұрын

With paper.

@JohnMackenzieInverness

Ай бұрын

yeah like Russia has the second best army ......in Ukraine

@johnadam2885

Ай бұрын

It seems your consoling yourself after Russia defeated you.

@texture6

Ай бұрын

NEVER FORGET a Yugoslav Army unit shot down an F-117 Nighthawk stealth aircraft of the United States Air Force by firing a S-125 Neva/Pechora surface-to-air missile ALSO THE AK-47 is WELL TRAVELED AROUND THE WORLD

@NDSMD

Ай бұрын

​@@texture6the AK is considered a peasant weapon. You need no IQ to use it lol 😂

"The S-400 is as good if not better than the Patriot System." That had me dying!😂😂

@mikhailsevryukov4056

Ай бұрын

why, dude? :))

@Erickpicapiedra

Ай бұрын

Why ???

@matt.willoughby

Ай бұрын

@@mikhailsevryukov4056 because it's not. Patriot is getting 90% intercept against cruise missiles and S-400 is getting whacked by Storm shadow, a 30year old missile 😂

@mikhailsevryukov4056

Ай бұрын

@@matt.willoughby nice theory 🤷‍♂️

@dakotarice2535

Ай бұрын

Hype storm shadow then. If you launched storm shadow at a patriot it would hit. It’s not like Patriots are using any widely different tech or methods. AD is AD, Radar is Radar. Russia does not yet have such storm shadow type missiles in large production. They did send one similar grow hugging missile at the recent power plant which was supposably protected by patriot.

Remember not so long ago when Russian fanboys were hyping S-400 as a “stealth killer”? Lol.

@nonamenosurname8516

Ай бұрын

What other weapon system in the world ever shot down 2x AWACS planes within a week? Only S-400 can do that. At least if you believe russian version. My bet is on Ukrainians. Noone would be that stupid to think there is Ukraine aircraft over sea of Azov...

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

No, S-125 Neva is stealth killer with proven track records.

@christianjohansson5440

Ай бұрын

And us said patriot stops everything 😂🤣😂 yeah... As a target 🤣😂

@arthas640

Ай бұрын

Don't forget how the Armata was going to give the Abrams a run for its money but can't be operated reliably on parade grounds

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

@@arthas640 you are right. End result was that Abrams had to accept destruction by much older weapons.😂

Russia and it's stuff has always been a joke, but then, quantity is a quality in it's own right

@LOTUG98

Ай бұрын

But they don't even produce it in enough quantity

@joshuathompson3325

Ай бұрын

Man, it sounds like a broken record with these people and that stupid Stalin quote. Yes we all have heard it about a million times.

@markdsm-5157

Ай бұрын

Correction: A joke maybe for a super power or a near peer to a super power. but for everyone else, they'll work just fine. P.S. And it's arguably, a training issue. Russia has some super power equipment but the human element is not up to par.

@jackwalker9492

Ай бұрын

Yep, our Sherman tanks were not good tanks in WWII. But when a German tank could take out 10 Shermans, we had 11. (Quote from a German General more or less)

@Hew.Jarsol

Ай бұрын

Like the USA always copy British ideas... Commandos /Rangers, OSS, CIA, green berets, Delta force, us seals etc

Well, Russian air defense seems to be shooting a lot of its own air assets down.

@gbagira1

Ай бұрын

Good luck for Ukraine then. By the way, the fact that Ukraine has not been able to capture one single city of Russia is a proof that this statement is a bleue lie

@hooywamd00pe95

Ай бұрын

Junk can still shoot down junk.

@gbagira1

Ай бұрын

@@hooywamd00pe95 and Ukraine can capture more and more cities of Russia 🤣🤣

@davids.6671

Ай бұрын

In sovjet russia the efficency is measured in civil or friendly aircraft per shot. A hit is a hit! If you identify a 737 as ballistic Missile it is also effective against those...

@gooldii1

Ай бұрын

🤣

Looks like corn silos strapped to a truck

@Jakedelus

Ай бұрын

and with tilting mechanism so you can get all the corn out!

@justinwolf7490

Ай бұрын

That’s pretty much what it is.

@TheRisingFury

Ай бұрын

They were actually constructed from repurposed drain pipes

@darkonojic7494

Ай бұрын

You should know that its cold launch system is state of art.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

Just like Patriots. But unlike Patriots, it can launch missile in any direction. Vertical launching from vehicles, opposed to vessels, is too complicated technology for US MIC to design and field.

I guess the "S" in the S-400 stands for "S"hit.. 😊😊

@DOI_ARTS

Ай бұрын

Suka* 😂😂😂

@nich7622

Ай бұрын

That is a master level of humour. Prolly same ‘shakespeare’, who wrote text for this video.

@heartofsteel7821

Ай бұрын

​@@nich7622Russian know they are not superpowers. But its western experts and analysts that say it is.!

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

S-125, 125 stands for "125 is larger than 117".

I heard Russians are fighting with space shovels and use washing machine chips because of shortage XD

@tenglim4406

Ай бұрын

Oh, I last heard that the Soviet used to buy it from Japan during the Cols War!? 😅

@nich7622

Ай бұрын

S-400. S-stands for shovel.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

They are using cruising guided antitank washing machines. Similar to Mavericks, but without explosive charge. Instead, they use pure weight and kinetic effect.

@kkirillka89

Ай бұрын

Представь что будет,если им дать автоматы)

Russian math: our battalion of 8 launchers with 4 tubes can handle...80 targets at once!!!

Russia is a complete Paper-Tiger!

@alfran1

Ай бұрын

But atomar weapond.

@gooldii1

Ай бұрын

@@alfran1 like the free, democratic West!

@m.g7809

Ай бұрын

Why are they beating the entire western world in a proxy-war then?

I would never say it is a joke. Is it as good as it is on paper? Doubtful, but its still effective and a threat to pilots and aircrew.

@kolakpatolik1857

Ай бұрын

So where was it when Ukrainians vaporized oil refineries, and tank factory few days ago? They did it not with a modern weaponry, but handmade drones. Curtain.

@darex0827

Ай бұрын

@@kolakpatolik1857 I find it very unlikely Russia has any air defense systems that deep in the country. This strike may actually force them to reposition assets away from the front to protect critical infrastructure.

@jjjr.1186

Ай бұрын

​@@darex0827why not on the Ukraine border where threats are guaranteed. Lol. Yes these airplanes. Helicopters and drones. Himars missiles and more evade s300 s400 and s500. Even Moscow the capital itself has no effective defence as it's also been hit.

@darex0827

Ай бұрын

@@jjjr.1186 100%. The system is definitely not perfect by any means. That doesn't chance my original premise of the system being a threat.

@stolly27

Ай бұрын

@@darex0827 any system will be a threat even the Ukrainian Buk missile system

Everyone knows the reason the USSR and later the Russians put so much into SAM systems is because they have always been relatively weak in the air.

Are you sure Russia has seven functional AWACS style aircraft? Others have said they have two or three functional and the others are being used for parts.

@damianketcham

Ай бұрын

It’s three or it was three. Just one now. The others are spare parts or being upgraded.

@cruisinguy6024

Ай бұрын

It’s debatable how many operational planes are left but effectively they have 0 because at this point they’ve likely learned a hard lesson and won’t let them go anywhere near Ukraine.

@OleDiaBole

Ай бұрын

They are out of missiles too, and they figjt with shovels. Ofcourse your intel is military grade and all ther awcs were vaporised by ghost 0f Kiekokainsk

@bekeneel

Ай бұрын

@@cruisinguy6024 Yes & another problem is having the expierenced personel for this kinda of advanced plane, those that were, died with them..

Well S-400 has excellent missiles. But antiquated radar, fire control and IFF. A combination that makes it deadly to friendly aircraft, and requires frequent shutdowns of air defense. With radars the situation is bad because while Russians make them powerful and use correct bands for correct tasks - they somehow fail at providing clear picture. Their radars see objects far away, but are unable to classify/identify them. Just like in western radars, algorythms are used to filter out the noise unrelated objects like birds and stuff - but Russian radars seem to often filter out valid enemy aircraft/munitions from view. What I want to say is that key feature of S-400 is it's unreliability. One time it will snipe aircraft at 100 km perfectly fine, another time it won't even react to enemy within range, and yet another time it will shoot down a friendly aircraft. It's all over the place. Technically western systems are less capable - but 80-90% efficient at what they do, Russian systems are more capable but give you 50/50 chance of working as intended.

@TrevorSachko

Ай бұрын

You could have just said "the C400 system is crap"....

@Beneficiis

Ай бұрын

@@TrevorSachko That would be simply my opinion then, I wanted to show my logic/observations as to why I think S-400 is crap.

@krimokrimov6050

Ай бұрын

This means that Russian weapons have power, but they lack in computing power On the other hand, the Chinese have strong computing power, but their weapons lack power. A combination of the two could give weapons that are close to American weapons

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

@@TrevorSachko is Patriot any better?

@Beneficiis

Ай бұрын

@@BojanPeric-kq9et I know you are asking different guy but... In some ways Patriot is better. But it's not that simple. Patriot is overall more reliable system. It's software and radar was combat tested time and time again, had way more action than S-300/S-400 ever saw, . But Patriot is also more limited system - It only does this ~120 km range / short ballistic defense. It does it well. But S-300/S-400 has A LOT of different missiles reaching out to like 400+ KM with crazy large missiles, to very nimble rockets with ~30 km range. S 300/S 400 also has it's own early warning radars - something that for Patriot needs to be provided externally by different systems - so it is more... self - contained than Patriot, you can use it by itself and it will work, Patriot needs to have other systems supporting it to be effective.

Russia should come to the realization that they are only a nuclear power, and NOT a super power. They should conserve resources, leave other countries alone and concentrate on defending Siberia. I do hope Putin knows that China is eyeing that.

@GreenIsland38

Ай бұрын

BS.

@badrobotNG

Ай бұрын

It's easy to type away on a keyboard....until you're the pilot with a s400 missile on your tail.

@MikeOxlong-

Ай бұрын

Look at the butthurt replies to your truth bomb. 😂

@Randomized91

Ай бұрын

it's only US the superpower

@gerryhouska2859

Ай бұрын

Manchuria is historically Chinese.

Let's not forget the failure of the S-400 to defend and take down the Storm Shadow missiles that devastated the Black Sea Fleet's HQ which was an incredibly well defended point, not only by the S-400 but with an overlapping BUK, TOR and Pantsir systems. They all failed to detect or at least engage and take down the incoming stealthy Storm Shadows. We've seen what the Ukrainians did and are still doing to the "legendary", "vaunted" and "the best air defense systems in the world". Now imagine NATO taking a shot with all its might, including the 5th gen stealthy fighter jets combined with the B-2 stealth bombers. Now add the 4th gen fighters carrying the long range stealthy missiles in massive numbers, missiles like the aforementioned Storm Shadows augmented by the much longer ranged JASSMs plus the Joint Strike missile, high speed anti radiation missiles and last but not the least - the mighty Tomahawks fired from the destroyers and submarines... Imagine how well would the Russian integrated air defense system cope with all of the above... The Russian Armed Forces would be decimated within a week and Putin would directly threaten specific cities with a nuclear attack an hour after the demolition of his forces started... Of course, nobody would ever want to send a single NATO soldier on the RUssian territory, but the nuclear threats would be responded with a gentle reminder that the multiple NATO members are the nuclear powers themselves so any use of the weapon would result in a response in kind so therefore is a non starter,...

@danielcostache6980

Ай бұрын

If Russia would not be a nuclear power, USA would have "liberate" it as it did with other countries in the middle east.

@bradgeffers1080

Ай бұрын

One of the best comments I’ve ever read. Thx.

@TheTruth-vi1nf

Ай бұрын

That's a pretty interesting analsys my friend. Let me guess. You are American right? I am not an American, but I am also very knowledgeable about military matters. It's really late now where I live but I would like to write a rebuttal to this. I will tomorrow. Nite.

@bradgeffers1080

Ай бұрын

@@TheTruth-vi1nf Yes I am. Look forward to hearing from you. I try to keep up with what’s going on in the world especially in the military stuff. Not for war whatsoever and I totally understand other countries have powerful weapons too but from things I have heard is how corrupt the Russian military is with money which in turn effects their power by nott having funds for better weapons. 60 minutes did a story on this early on in the Ukrainian war. Very interesting story. Let’s hope that this never comes about.

@pogo1140

Ай бұрын

@@TheTruth-vi1nf The Russians released the video of their Pantsir launching missiles at a Storm Shadow missile as it flew by and missing them

detection is not targetting. Detection only lets you know what will kill you, if you cant target and destroy it.

Paper Bears, Paper Tigers and Paper Kimchi (LOL I don't know how to call Nokor) 😂

@MK_ULTRA420

Ай бұрын

(It's the same paper tiger)

@Zephyrmec

Ай бұрын

My dad had a saying he used to describe statements like pootie’s, “he speaks like a bully with a paper azzhole” talks massive chit, no evidence and no way to back it up. Modern equivalent: “mouth writing checks his azz can’t cash”

as a reminder, Cessnas already breeched russican air space twice.

@bekeneel

Ай бұрын

Beware tho those planes or drones may have been launched from somewhere in russia too, as happened before.. Not necessarily tho, but certainly possible.

Turkey made a big mistake

@Jack-lk7wk

Ай бұрын

Not really because instead they've created the worlds largest drone air fleet and its quite a brilliant idea

@bekeneel

Ай бұрын

@@Jack-lk7wk That's nice but they got kicked out of the F35 program, just for acquiring that useless S400 crap lol..

All you need to know about Russian capabilities is their north korean threats

@wojciech_leszczynski

Ай бұрын

So true. They've got nothing else to even hope threatening us

@turnnexg6398

Ай бұрын

@@wojciech_leszczynski but you still feel threatened

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

All you need about US capabilities is that any country with more than 10 millions people will eventually win a war against US.

@bekeneel

Ай бұрын

@@turnnexg6398 US sending 60bil$ & Nato 100bil$ military aid to Ukraine, shows otherwise.

Just when militaries of the past called their opponents what could be termed as "a joke" is when they were caught short. History repeats itself in many different ways.

@jank5989

Ай бұрын

You are thinking wrong. USA is calling what it sees a joke. Which is to be expected. The conflict started when Russia called Ukraine a joke and went into full bully mode. Any retaliation is justified.

@Shinobubu

Ай бұрын

let me preface this. Israel has been using American technology for decades destroying the BEST Russia has. That's enough evidence okay? Russia makes inferior tech. Just like they have no industry that will leave a mark on this planet long after they collapse. You don't drive Russian cars, you don't use Russian electronics, the only thing Russia has is Oil and oligarchs. That is the only thing Russia will leave behind.

@kalebthehistorian5928

Ай бұрын

@@jank5989 And this is the sort of talk that's going to get us into WWIII. Honestly, how you even believe such garbage is beyond me. "Any retaliation is justified" he says, not realizing that Ukraine will cease to exist as a country because they were stupid enough to trust the people who only know how to fight based on the Gulf War, and nothing else.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

@@kalebthehistorian5928 there is video of former Zelensky's adviser or something like that, "we bet on wrong horse and Ukraine is now demolished country". Very short and really painful to watch. And what for? So Zelensky could get taps on shoulder and be called "brave".

2007?! I don't think Russia can replace the Blackberry phones controlling the missiles because they don't make them anymore.

@MK_ULTRA420

Ай бұрын

They'll have to resort to using eBay lmao

turkey buying some to test was a serious 4-d chess move. well done boys :D

It's just an air defense system, it can barely stop 3rd gen, it will not stop 4th generation, and it definitely won't stop 5th gen fighters. Facts

abrams n patriots left the chat

Ask the Ukrainians how much of a joke it really is

I'm not an expert but with the information I have, I would not bother with an S-400. That 60 year old Russian tanks still work is a somewhat impressive. It seems like the Russian hardware is never the bestn but it lasts a long time and is easy to maintain.

@ExternalInputs

Ай бұрын

Whereas the much newer US tanks burn very well.

@TrevorSachko

Ай бұрын

So if it is as easy to maintain as you say, why dont they maintain it?

@thepaperboy9009

Ай бұрын

@@TrevorSachkoFrom a lot that I have read, they likely spent the $ ear marked for maintenance to buy foreign luxury villas and yachts.

Equivalent to the Patriot, what a joke.. And that's almost 40 years on hahahahha

The art of anti stealth is making the enemy think it has full stealth.

@bekeneel

Ай бұрын

Hmmm, meaning what exactly?

I do not know just how effective Russia's Nuclear Arsenal really is.

@TerryOkome

Ай бұрын

Stupid remarks!!!

@eddieforrest973

Ай бұрын

​@@TerryOkome yours ?cause his was valid russia is a paper tiger they lie about everything why would you exspect them tp be honest about the effectivness of there nukes it makes sence if you dont beileve the nukes are going to be used is a prime target for some corrupt official to capitalize on

@Theiliteritesbian

Ай бұрын

Ya no one does. This is the dumbest thing i've read in a few weeks.

@eddieforrest973

Ай бұрын

@@Theiliteritesbian “Just because no one knows doesn’t make it dumb; it’s perfectly rational to question how effective Russia’s nuclear weapons are.”

@gillestu1407

Ай бұрын

thex have enough warheads and one will do the damage. So it's irrelevant

The real joke is the countries believing Ruzzian and bought these over priced scam.

One of the most interesting things I have seen in the last few months was the Israeli, American, UK etc. response to the Iranian missle attack. Iran sent hundreds of missles, cruise missles and drones at Israel and they were virtually all swatted down. I found that to be really impressive. What happens when the US starts employing high energy beem weapons?

N0 - it's been found out, the missiles they are supposed to shoot down - are destroying them!!

I like how the US hardware even looks cooler lol

@Nickname-ef9tv

Ай бұрын

Function over form. And US hardware has a lot of function.

@gooldii1

Ай бұрын

me too!

@BOZ_11

Ай бұрын

@@Nickname-ef9tv Patriot missiles are sub-par

“it’s a gas station with Nukes”. Yeah that’s didn’t really pan out.

@jmjones7897

Ай бұрын

Russia is now importing refined fuel from Belarus. As in they've ordered Luka to send his Gas/ Petrol and Fuel Oil to Russia. Seems their refineries keep exploding and catching on fire.

@Blodhelm

Ай бұрын

Yeah, turns out it's just a gas station, the money to maintain the nukes was used to buy oligarchs more mega-yachts.

Quick question why do Americans just hate Russia like what's the reason💀

@404Learning

Ай бұрын

It’s because they were told my movies to hate Russia. 99,99% of American citizens don’t even know why they hate Russia.

@battlebornsupermoto954

Ай бұрын

Invading a peaceful country will do that....

@jgstargazer

Ай бұрын

If America ever "wakes up" it should form an alliance with Russia and fight or defend against the real threat facing us and that the Islamic threat to make the world all Islamic.

@eddieforrest973

Ай бұрын

Because russia is threatning to nuke everyone they are comitting war crimes aginst ukraine they lie about everything you can only trust putin As far as his security would let you throw him witch is 0 feet

@eddieforrest973

Ай бұрын

​@@jgstargazeryea the us isnt going to ally with a evil authoritarin regime russia is a global outcast as they should be with only there ww3 allies for support cant to get this show started already i want to see how it ends

Russian air defense is a laughable matter to people who aren't pilots I guess. 🤷‍♀

@Blodhelm

Ай бұрын

More dangerous for Russian pilots these days, they've been shooting down their own.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

@@Blodhelm 100% because Ukrainians don't fly anything.

What in hell happened to the F-16's

@AdrianFahrenheitTepes

Ай бұрын

They will go into Ukraine in the summer

@TheTruth-vi1nf

Ай бұрын

Ukraine still getting them, but they were postponed due to a lack of pilots and a lack of a suitable airport for them. Russia has been bombing the airfields which I guess has made them unusable for now. Probably a better idea to give the Ukrainians more tanks or armoured personnel vehicles . That's somewhat more useful. I fear the F16 may not last long in the air.

@denniscrork318

Ай бұрын

​@@TheTruth-vi1nfPlus, if they take off from an airfield outside Ukraine, that airfield is a legitimate target now.

Because Russia is a joke

@johnadam2885

Ай бұрын

The joke that defeated the collective west.

@unclecreepy8343

Ай бұрын

​@@johnadam2885you need to get out of your mommy's house & get a job 😂

@unclecreepy8343

Ай бұрын

Or become a MAN and join the ARMY INFANTRY!

@texture6

Ай бұрын

NEVER FORGET a Yugoslav Army unit shot down an F-117 Nighthawk stealth aircraft of the United States Air Force by firing a S-125 Neva/Pechora surface-to-air missile ALSO THE AK-47 is WELL TRAVELED AROUND THE WORLD

@texture6

Ай бұрын

An American MQ-9 Reaper flying near Yemen has been shot down by Houthi militants

Iran just proved this video

Did he say the F 35 was more stealthy than the F 22 raptor? This is not accurate.

@brenthegarty3922

Ай бұрын

I've been seeing this in some other reports too. It's possible the USAF hasn't been completely honest about the stealth comparison between the F22 and F35, either previously or now, so cant say for sure. However it makes sense actually that F35 is more stealthy. It was developed by the same company, but several years later with advancements in RAM and geometry. Seems like it -should- be more stealthy. Well likely never know for sure.

@Istandby666

Ай бұрын

We were on the program YF-23 and X-32. So I'm biased towards the 22 and 35. The YF-22 and the F-22 have better RCS than the 35. Public information shows the 35 @ 0.001 and the 22 @ 0.0001. No these are not accurate numbers. The 22 is a little better than 0.00001. Remember, the 35 is the ugly step child.

@SelfProclaimedEmperor

Ай бұрын

​@@Istandby666I've heard rumor that while overall the f-22 is more stealthy, the F-35 is specifically more stealthy from the frontal aspect than the F-22

@AbruptandOffensive

Ай бұрын

The F-35 is more cumulatively stealthy than the F-22. The F-22 is more standalone stealthy than the F-35. Its harder to see and track an F-22 simply flying in stealth mode compared to the F-35 but the F-35’s ability to jam enemy radar and then kill it from BVR makes it more untrackable and unhittable than the F-22 alone. Once the F-35 goes EW, it’s essentially invisible, even more “stealthy” than the F-22.

@cruisinguy6024

Ай бұрын

The F-22 is stealthier as it has the RCS of 0.0001m2, about the size of a bumblebee (same as a B-2). The F-35, the RCS is 0.005m2 or about a golf ball however the F-35 has a weakness in the rear due to the large nozzle. For comparison the B-1 with its low observable design has a RCS of 10m2, and the F-15 25m2. Of course it’s not so cut and dry but the F-35 was never intended to be more stealthy than the F-22 and B-2 as that would have significantly increased the cost and hurt its multi purpose design. The F-35 from the front has a slightly smaller RCS than the F-117 but keep in mind the F-117 was also designed for IR stealth, from the rear the F-35 is a big bright red juicy target. The important thing to remember is the F-22 and B-2 are 1980s tech. Think about how ancient that is in technological terms - the smartphone in your pocket is far more capable than a supercomputer when these planes were designed and back then a mobile phone was the size of small briefcase. The technology in the NGAD and B-21 programs is probably 30 years ahead of any foreign nation, heck it’s taken Russia and China 35 years and they still can’t come remotely close to the 40 year old tech of the B-2 or F-22. Think about for a moment.

Given that Ukraine was able to fly at least two general aviation aircraft over 900 nmi deep into Russia and strike high value targets without so much as a single inquiry by Russia much less fighter scramble, I would submit an F-35 would just fly between the alleged radar net and strike what ever target you want. I doubt they would be able to mount any credible defense. You could probably even do this with a flight of F-16s.

@LRRPFco52

Ай бұрын

It’s one of the reasons why they hated the B-1A so much, and got traitors inside the US to kill it. Reagan revived it as the B-1B, which doesn’t go Mach 2 like the B-1A did.

@kkirillka89

Ай бұрын

Это когда такое было?)

Nations who bought this system will regret it when they need it for defence. The Russian mind set does not allow deviations to sort out the problems.

Lets hope that we never have to know how those things work against each other.

@bekeneel

Ай бұрын

Russia wouldn't stand a chance in a conventional war against Nato. But that's why it want's to be avoided, cuz then it can escalate. putin barks with nukes cuz he knows Nato would easily wipe the floor with his army. Ukraine could be liberated in days only..

My honest opinion is that it was a calculated move by NATO particularly the US and Turkey to acquire the S400 to study it and test its weaknesses and Russia fell for it.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

By the way, S-400 is old thing.

@BOZ_11

Ай бұрын

Then why did USA freeze Turkey out of the F-35 program and steal the $1.4bn Turkey sunk into F-35 development?

@user-lz8qo2ie7s

Ай бұрын

​@@BojanPeric-kq9et 2007 is old?

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

@@user-lz8qo2ie7s well, depends. For some people in West 30+ years Soviet SAMs were "state of the art" and they bragged about defeating them. Same story with tanks. Is your phone or computer from 2007 old? I am not aware of public information (not speculations!) about possible upgrades in S-400 systems, but original S-400 (and even more original S-300) is not quite "latest and greatest".

I love when KZreadrs use AI to write all their scripts

@AdrianFahrenheitTepes

Ай бұрын

Yeah, it's disappointing.

@Chrischos

Ай бұрын

Like Russian Bot Farms now use AI to spam more bots and not evn typing messages themselfs anymore why u dont even get a answer often times anymore ? ok

@TheBen9701

Ай бұрын

@@Chrischos 🤖

@realspeed1944

Ай бұрын

@@Chrischos Holy robot jesus

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

Because AI is smarter than their NS (natural stupidity).

Try it out, then make a statement - (if you survive).

Based on all of their other hardware and people, I doubt it's any good.

Letting Russia and Serbia delude themselves into believing their SAM systems were anti-stealth was the greatest psy-op of all time

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

And US military might is good only against small 3rd world countries. North Korea is peer adversary for US. North Korea...

Russian air defense system beeing a joke was confirmed today :)

Navy zero'ed out the budget line item for FA-XX this week for the 2025 budget. So its effectively a dead effort. If they want to bring it back for FY 2026, it will have to be re-competed against other budget requests to even make it into the request. One can only assume either they didn't feel it was making as much progress as desired, or they hope to piggy back on the Air Force NGAD, or hope to derive from that program instead.

@LRRPFco52

Ай бұрын

A lot of times when you see a developmental budget zero out, it means it has transitioned to a funded program under a different source of funds. Not sure what it going on with FA-XX, but something to think about.

Your maths is a bit off mate. If a NASAMS battery has 12 launchers with 6 interceptors per launcher is has 72 shots not 76 😅

@TrevorSachko

Ай бұрын

Oh dear, you really burned him there....

@matt.willoughby

Ай бұрын

@@TrevorSachko let's be honest. Factual accuracy and this channel are not well aquatinted

@matt.willoughby

Ай бұрын

acquainted!

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

@@matt.willoughby common sense and this channel are not in any connection. That makes him funny!

@matt.willoughby

Ай бұрын

@@BojanPeric-kq9et Yeah there's lots of Copium on this channel 🤣 I'm in favour of Ukraine remaining independent. If Russia invaded Serbia I would support Serbian independence too. I'm guessing you don't 🤭

When a NATO country such as Turkey buys S-400's, presumably NATO knows pretty much everything about its capabilities and how to counter it

@pogo1140

Ай бұрын

No, the US and NATO do not have access to the Turkish S-400.

@martinh9099

Ай бұрын

@@pogo1140A NATO country has working S-400's...but can't access the internals or workings? How so??

@pogo1140

Ай бұрын

@martinh9099 Turkey does not allow access to the S-400, part of the Russian loan terms. The US has an S-300 and a lot of signal data from the S-400

What’s happening with all the S400’s getting knocked out by ATACMS?

The radar systems would all be destroyed before one missile was fired

@pike100

Ай бұрын

I am an American, but your comment is a textbook example of extreme hyperbole. 😢

@MohamedIbrahim-rv7ii

Ай бұрын

And so will New York, Chicago, Miami, Washington, LA etc etc

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

Any antiradiation missile is a missile. Thus it can be intercepted.

The actual truth is Russia has better air defenses then we do, don’t get it twisted. The first causalty in war is the truth, also never underestimate your enemy

@bekeneel

Ай бұрын

😂😂 You must've lived under a rock past 2 years.. Did you even watch this video?

@foxglow6798

Ай бұрын

@@bekeneelit is likely true. The U.S. doesn’t invest much in anti-air technology since it expects to not need it very much due to U.S. air supremacy. Most American launchers focus on anti-ballistic-missile capabilities. The tremendous standoff distances the U.S. operates at eliminates the need for substantial anti-aircraft ground units.

@Alphasaurus-fq7nu

Ай бұрын

@@bekeneel I literally know people who are seeing this shit first hand 🤦🏻‍♂️

@bekeneel

Ай бұрын

@@foxglow6798 Lol, come on. They have Patriot, that has been much & long upgraded, clearly better than anything russia or china has. There is Thaad & Aegis specifically against ballistic missile threats. Spy satellites.. And they're close also to laser weapons to take out air targets. Also have powerful CIWS like PHalanx or other CRAM guns. That is a lot & requires lots of research, investment & technology.. I think it's pretty far ahead anything the other "superpowers" have. And that's only what we know of..

@ishitabhalla4462

29 күн бұрын

​@@bekeneelpatriot Can't detect F-35 but S-300 Syria Deceted F-35 and also Proves This video is USA Shi* 🤣 Last time this same channel told Ukraine is winning but reality Ukraine losing more casualties and also Land Remember cry only in this kind of videos 😭 but Legend's win in realty ☠️

S400 has never intercepted a subsonic storm shadow.

Source From : KZread video a joke

The S500 with have problems at the maximum theoretical range of the radar, because, just like everybody, we are dealing with the curvature of the earth here.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

S-500 is for different job.

Seems that all Russian systems are overhyped and American systems are under hyped.

@spencerstevens2175

Ай бұрын

Eh there's a quality to over hyping. The only way to really find out is to go toe to toe. May make someone think twice, avoiding conflict. Obviously, Russia plans on selling a lot of this stuff too. So there's that

@globalterroil3208

Ай бұрын

What is _Patriot_ doing? ;-)

@frankmcgowan3371

Ай бұрын

@@globalterroil3208 knocking down the Russian hypersonic missiles they said couldn’t be intercepted 😂

@spencerstevens2175

Ай бұрын

@@globalterroil3208 selling like hotcakes after being proven in Ukraine

@globalterroil3208

Ай бұрын

LOL You do know that _it_ is the other way around, right? @@frankmcgowan3371

Coming from a country that cant even keep its ships from hitting bridges. You guys couldnt even beat a bunch of goat hearders.

I’m sure turkey got more than fairly compensated by the US for buying S400s

As for Nato air defense systems, lets not forget that on March 10th 2022 old Soviet 6200 kg 13700 lbs Tupoljev drone 13 meters long technology from 50 years ago. That drone crused over 3 Nato member countries and landed in center of Zagreb Croatia😮. Luckily no one was injured. How come that Romania, Slovakia, Hungary nor Croatia was able to shoot it down? That is over 1000km from Ukrainian border.

@phbrinsden

Ай бұрын

Because no one expected Russia to do something that stupid over countries at peace. Russia can’t even control its forces. It has lunatics running things.

@TrevorSachko

Ай бұрын

The answer to that question should be obvious. Then again, maybe not....

@pogo1140

Ай бұрын

Well, as long as it's track does not show that it's headed for a designated protected area, most NATO SAM's will not engage it

@nickmarco9259

Ай бұрын

i guess nato hides its actual air defence capabilities for an actual war to make a nasty suprise to any hostile

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

@@pogo1140 no SAM and no fighters to intercept it? Come on. That is worse than Cesna on Red Square.

Russia is an expert at hype. And vaporware.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

Not really. US beat Russia long time ago with Future Combat System.

State your country and it's own defense system and match it with the Russian. Mine is South Africa and we don't even one.

Could’ve shorted this video to Russia can’t shoot down an Amazon drone.. meanwhile the patriot system just defended Israel from 300+ in single attack..

The Abrams was hyped also...

@daytonaflyer

Ай бұрын

That's true, but Ukraine received only the older M1A1's and they all had their armor removed.

@Johnny-bm7ry

Ай бұрын

​@@daytonaflyer even with its depleted uranium armor, the Abrams top armor is its weakness like most other tanks.

@logicplague2077

Ай бұрын

@@Johnny-bm7ry No one ever said they were invincible. Contrary to popular belief, we don't have alien tech at Area 51 to work with.

@lloydhuynh5130

Ай бұрын

M1A1 is older than the 90M tank.

@Johnny-bm7ry

Ай бұрын

​@@logicplague2077 I know. I'm just pointing out the Abrams are just as vulnerable as any other tank to a $1000 FPV drone with a mortar shell.

If S-400, s-500, S-550 are not good air defense systems, are there really any good air defense systems in the world? Patriot is inferior even to cold war S-300. So, which one is the "good" air defense system?

And US said patriot is untouchable.. yet he got very touched. Everyone's exaggerate.

Dude USA afraid of S-400 😂 This is why USA crys on evryone And say's don't buy S-400 buy only patriot system All this USA do for to increase their wepons business 😂

ROFL. Are you confusing Taiwan with China? Taiwan uses the Patriot.

Let F-16s arrive and show what s-400 is

Putin keep your head down, don't stir up the ants next, when your running out of everything.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

Russia is running out of everything for 2 years.

@hydra8845

4 күн бұрын

It’s funny you say this as Ukraine is collapsing in Western countries are running out of weapons

This channel consistently produces some of the most intelligence-insulting content out there. Good thing then that most of the viewers can't be insulted, as they have no intelligence.

@nich7622

Ай бұрын

Channel simply fuels those minions who are comfy within their informational bubble. They laugh, condemn and hope as they like.

@itz_me_kratos

Ай бұрын

Truth

@balajivarre

Ай бұрын

On the dot gist

@OleDiaBole

Ай бұрын

How is it that they all forgoten how entire n4ato did not manage to supress and "anihilate" airdefence of tiny winy Yugoslavia?

@MrStretchification

Ай бұрын

How's that three day operation going? How well are Russia's modern equipment fairing against Cold War Era equipment?

17:13 Crimea is also internationally recognized as Ukrainian sovereign territoriy. Its conquest and annexation by Russia was in spite of international Law, and specifically the UN Charter.

@TheTruth-vi1nf

Ай бұрын

Russian is not going to give back Crimea to Ukraine. Never going to happen.

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

NATO countries had showed that "internationally recognized sovereign territory" is actually very fluid term which can be changed by military force. UN and International Law are passe for US. POTUS etc are all about "rules based order".

what a stupid reasoning ..... the S-400 complex is an element of the deeply layered defense of the Russians. The complex itself works in a network with other complexes, satellites, and radar reconnaissance aircraft. The S-400 complex is covered by mobile small air defense installations Pantsir and Tor, as well as aviation. Pantsir and Thor shoot down enemy missiles and cruise bombs with a high degree of probability. The S-400 system itself may not emit, but use data from other systems. A separate S-400 system, of course, cannot see low-flying targets beyond the horizon line, due to the roundness of the planet. In Ukraine, the S-400 shot down many Ukrainian aircraft using data from reconnaissance aircraft. The S-400 itself is about 15 years ahead of the Patriot system, in terms of launch range, radar systems, mobility of the complex, and the speed of deployment of the complex. The S-400 shoots in any direction, unlike the Patriot. And Russia produces more anti-aircraft missiles than the United States and NATO countries combined.

@KSmithwick1989

Ай бұрын

The obvious problem is that the launch unit only carries 4 missles. For example, a Patriot PAC-3 battery with 8 launch units has 128 missles. While a S-300 /S-400 battery with a launch units only has 32 missles. Also, integrated air defenses are not unique to Russia.

@championknife

Ай бұрын

@@KSmithwick1989 Can you imagine missiles hitting an airplane at 60 km and 400 km? They are very different in size, so the ammunition is different. The S400 will also receive missiles from the S 500 complex with a range of 600 km. At such a range, the complex can fire and change position before a retaliatory attack occurs. I work not far from the C-400 fields, and I saw them moving very cheerfully after each repulsed attack from Ukraine

@SlavicCelery

Ай бұрын

Lol no. The S-400 is not superior to the Patriot system.

@championknife

Ай бұрын

@@SlavicCelery The United States is lagging behind Russia in missile technology, as an example, Russia is using hypersonic missiles in Ukraine, Russia is rearming with new Sarmat missiles with planning maneuvering warheads. The United States does not have this, they are only trying to develop such systems. Aren't you surprised by the range of the S 400, S 500 - 600 km missiles, against the American 60 km? In Ukraine, no one bombs Russian troops, as the Ukrainian aviation is suffering losses and is afraid to approach the front line.

@KSmithwick1989

Ай бұрын

@@championknife To honestly, no I can't imagine S-400 using S-500 missles. As the physical dimensions don't make sense. S-500 carries a pair of larger missles. It serves as an analog to the US THAAD, which carries 4 missles despite being about the size of S-400. With less support vehicles than either. As for firing and leaving, you're not doing that with S-400/S-500. Those launch units are not independent of the support vehicles. The command vehicle, various radar complex vehicles, and mobile relay antenna are the real targets. Those are not going to suddenly drive off. Especially considering the huge amount of cables from the power generation vehicle linking everything. The Battle Management Radar and relay antenna are also on semi-trailers, that takes some time to hitch backup. If you're making statements like that. Then you certainly have never either been around heavy trucks. Or even seen the different elements of the complex.

Now do a analysis on the US patriot system

@Shinobubu

Ай бұрын

Superior. Patriot system is superior to anything the Chinese and Russia made. Intercepting all of their fake Hypersonic missiles with ease. :>

Even the Abrams tank is a joke

Best way to test these old Russian missiles is with our new tech.

If Russian air defence is a joke, why is Ukraine begging for a defence against the hypersonics ? When is the US going to make a hypersonic missile ? Russian things are hardy and work in combat, and Russia has shown expertise in combined arms warfare. The US has not shown that and is shying away. It threw Ukraine under the bus and has slithered away, showing the utmost cowardice.

@KSmithwick1989

Ай бұрын

The US already had a hypersonic weapon in 2023. The LRHW it first entered service with the 3rd Field Artillery Regiment. Next year, the sea based version will enter service on board the Zumwalt-class destroyers.

@MinkieWinkle

Ай бұрын

You said it your self russia air defence sucks, as in equipment that defends against AIR threats. Ukraine Air defenses were primarily made of old Russian tech left behind from the ussr. Because it sucks Ukraine wants better us made. You answered your own question. Further more, did you honestly suggest the US has not demonstrated combined arms. Go look at operation desert storm. The entire iraqi military was defeated in a week. A army made up of mostly russia made equipment.

@logicplague2077

Ай бұрын

US has had hypersonic missiles for decades. Trident 3 goes Mach 24 unclassified.

@madanbisht6

Ай бұрын

​@@logicplague2077that's not hypersonic bcs that follow a predictable trajectory

@logicplague2077

Ай бұрын

@@madanbisht6 Hypersonic has nothing to do with maneuvering, anything that goes >Mach 5 is hypersonic.

Sure worked in Afghsnistan. US military defeated by a stoneage goat herders.

@prideb4caffeine999

Ай бұрын

You know who else was defeated by Stone Age goat herders? The Soviets, with several times more casualties in half the time. Everything works well in Afghanistan. Except for maybe strategic planning. Or a central government

@BojanPeric-kq9et

Ай бұрын

@@prideb4caffeine999 Government left after Soviet Union stood for a few years without any support, while US supported "moderate bin Laden and friends". Compare that with US withdrawal and fall of everything even before US completed withdrawal. Soviets had more casualties because they actually fought "everywhere", unlike US military. That is why Taliban "reappeared" so quickly after 20 years, after being "destroyed" in first few weeks.

With their rockets Russia has the capabilities to destroy every american aircraft carrier as well as the airfileds - not only in europe, with submarines also in USA. So air superior with jet fighter is not everything. Lets say americans launch an attack and russia is answering with hypersonic missiles to the aircraft carrier or airfileds. I beliefe it would be a bad deal for US.

S400: Acronym for Shit 400(Defects)!!! LOL 😢😢😢

Russian weapons may be 'fake' but they just tired the whole NATO, i mean, they produce results, they win the wars😅

The events in Putin's Ukrainian "Adventure" have shown that the much vaunted SA-21 Growler isn't the shit-hot, super-duper SAM system the Russians made it out to be, sure it can be dangerous but only if it's properly integrated into the local air-defence network, is properly protected and is run by competent, experienced staff.

@puraLusa

Ай бұрын

I think it's like all tech, it only works with a competent military 🤷‍♀️

The Iranians just showed missile defense is easily penetrated. All missile defenses are inherently weak.

By 2030, the US will have a 100 F16 drones serving as missile trucks for F35. The F16 can fire a dozen missile while remaining out of range of S400. The F35 can target and fire the missiles on the F16s. A single F36 will be able to fire dozens of missiles without losing stealth.

Well, I'm old enough to remember a stealth fighter being shot down by an old S125 "Russian joke air defense system".

@pietskiet42-_

Ай бұрын

Yeah...know some fighter pilots who have huge respect for Russian Air defense 😅😅😅

@pathfindercl

Ай бұрын

@@pietskiet42-_ Really? Probably not those who spent a wonderful time at the Hanoi Hotel...

@CorporalCookie

Ай бұрын

​@@pathfinderclLeaving a lot of details out from that story though. NATO complacency in mission planning, spies near the launch airfield, just the incredibly amount of luck that one radar sweep caught the aircraft at the exact moment it's not stealthy when it's bomb bays are open, etc. and that it still destroyed its target. And that no other craft was ever successfully shot down again, even though they kept doing bombing runs still.

@bekeneel

Ай бұрын

@@CorporalCookie Yea indeed, an F35 now or B2 or so would never take such risks now even.. It's funny I used to actually wonder if S400 could really detect or beat F35, well the answer became clear lol. The Ukranians found out the huge limits of S300 too sadly.. Only decent to target aircraft I suppose, but that's it..

@marvinszabo9627

21 күн бұрын

S400 is garbage in comparison to the Patriot battery…

Hollywood script

Highlighting Taiwan as part of China is a 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

Send your paper jets and see what happens😂😂😂😂😂

They tried with the F117 in Serbia... Old air defense system shut down the invisible plane... 😂😂😂

@freakyphil93

Ай бұрын

I mean, yeah, but a huge factor in that single aircraft being shot down was the US having really terrible operational security. The Yugoslavs knew exactly when the Nighthawks left, where they were going and when they’d get there, which kinda undermines the whole point of stealth. Defending against stealth aircraft gets A LOT more complicated if you don’t know exactly where they’ll be ahead of time. If Stealth aircraft are as dogshit as you’re seeming to claim, surely they’d have lost more than 1?

@TheStiggggg

21 күн бұрын

If you actually look at how the Serbians pulled off the shooting down of the F117, I'd say the stealth capabilities were quite effective. The Serbians figured out the route F117s were flying and got extremely lucky as they could only turn their radars on for seconds at a time to avoid HARMs.

Its more like your video is a joke. S400 wasn't used in Syria for political reasons because Russian instalations weren't attacked and shooting down US missiles would cancel the non aggression pact they had back then and possibly trigger WW3. F-117 is actually stealthier than both F-35 and F-22 in real world since F-117 has the lowest real RCS dettected at -29.1dB, 0.0012m2 from targeting radar when it was shot down while F35 RCS is rumored to be 0.0015m2 but probbably way more because of too much reliance to stealth coating. And Israeli F-35 was actually hit back in 2017 in Syria with S-200. And even tho S-400 has its limitations its still by far the best AD system in the real world.

@vucemlevu

Ай бұрын

@addisonjohn2094 Every stealth plane can be tracked by long wave radar tricky thing is to target a stealth plane. And our guys did it with Neva pencil beam radar from 14km away it was close to perfect shot. And I said that Israeli F35 was hit back in 2017 by Syrian S200 from much further away which means its RCS is probably way worse than F117. Which means if it is to be used in near peer conflict it will be sitting duck.