I just bought this piece yesterday, absolutely beautiful watch couldn’t care less if it was on the moon tbh, i am over the moon with this purchase!

@Laguna2013

Жыл бұрын

Congrats! How did you get an allocation?

Point 1: Good luck finding a nice attractive original untouched vintage Ed White, with correct bracelet and end-links, at this price point. Point 2 : If you did your research (hint : Nasa Archives), you would see in old color pics of these watches 105.003/2998 etc with tritium/radium, that indeed new tritium/radium was off-white to begin with...there's NO FAUX BRO. Its actually bang-on. Point 3 : If one follows the market for prices of vintage Speedmasters (its clear you don't, and that is ok :) ), the 'Moonwatch' as you know it, is priced lower than the EW (for same condition). It would appear Omega take the vintage market prices into account when pricing these, and thus it appears clear that a reissued 'Moonwatch' would thus cost less than than this (but not by much).

@63worf

4 жыл бұрын

Snow Rabbit Spot on!

The current 1861 movement may not have gone to the moon, but it's still certified by NASA & it's still been used in every one of their manned space programs since it was introduced

The only thing that went to the moon is the price of this Omega

@maxolson

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂

@whitepony101

4 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣👍🏽

@benfranko4031

4 жыл бұрын

Check our store for quality replica for 1/50 of the retail price of genuine Omega! Instagram: @WatchAddicted_market and get your grail timepiece !

4 жыл бұрын

haha

@Prophet293

4 жыл бұрын

@@benfranko4031 FOH

Yes the price is high, but if the market prices of the Daytona are that crazy, I'm totally ok with this one.

In hindsight, these are still super hard to get and grey market these have held up well in value. Wish you would do a follow up video on the 321 now that Daytonas are $30k +

Keep it up TTWC just a couple of months and you’re already my favorite KZread watch channel 👍🤩

I’d much rather have my “Sapphire Sandwich” at $4.5k

@mannycalavera2335

4 жыл бұрын

Or alternatively just simply the hesalite for around 3k. The more "special" versions are released, the better that deal appears.

@lurox5183

4 жыл бұрын

The sapphire is my preference over the hesalite. I love that caseback!

@markymark3572

4 жыл бұрын

I often find myself taking mine off just to admire the movement thru the case back😊 Sorry Omega, this is the only Speedy I'll ever need..

@lurox5183

4 жыл бұрын

@@mannycalavera2335 grin fandango is in my top 3 games ever btw!

What a beautiful piece … I have been told they only produced 1000 pieces a year due to The complexity to manufacture the movement … amazing piece ( how many Daytona’s Rolex produced a year? A couple of hundred thousands 😂😂😂😂)

Steel mass production Speedmaster with 3861 movement is coming as well. These 321 watches are hand assembled with the movement finished in Sedna Gold, hence the elevated price.

Great scoop, Oisin. I think you're the first watchguy to break the news! Thanks for the great content, your channel is about to explode!

Great watch, love the nod to Ed White and the sapphire case back as the movement is so good to look at, price well yes its a bit high but look at what you are paying for, a brand new 321 movement, a tribute to the history of the Speedmaster and the links to NASA and the space missions, oh and a 5 year guarantee, try getting that on a 50+ year old vintage watch. As for your hope that there will be a 'Moonwatch with the 321 well sorry to disappoint but that will not happen as there simply isn't enough movements to go round, the new Speedmaster movement will be the 3861 which was launched in the Apollo 11 50th watches and will be in the A13 50th later this year. Also, please stop complaining about Omega's missed opportunities, the A11 50th, sold out, what's wrong with that? The 321 is back and available in SS or Platinum. The 1861 will be discontinued this year and replaced with the 3861.

Again Omega is poised to snatch defeat from the hands of victory!!

Very timely. I was researching this new Omega release today and your video came along just in time. I thought Omega’s release was exactly what I was waiting for. It almost is. But your comments are spot on. Nevertheless, I like this watch a lot (except for the price, which is quite high) and appreciate finally seeing this center column wheel movement in a steel case.

@beagle101ful

2 жыл бұрын

The whole point of the watch is that Omega chose this reference to model their first (new) steel-encased 321 reference. Aside from the 1005.003 being a perfect candidate for their 321, they had decided to use Gene Cernan's own 105.003 to model the new movement ...literally. We're talking about the use of tomography in order to replicate every single part on a 1-1 basis. In any event, a reference associated with astronauts White & Cernan will certainly make for a perfect Speedmaster to house Omega's 321! While Speedmaster fans will forever associate the 105.003 with White's EVA, it's also important to note that it is one of three references to have been on the moon's surface. Last but certainly not least, the 105.003 was the first to be "flight-qualified by NASA for all manned space missions"! Transcript from Travelller over on Omega Forum. Spot on I’d say.

I commented on your previous video about Omega and, if I don't remember badly, I was almost spot on. I think I wrote that a 321 Moonwatch would have potentially damaged sales for Omega on the long run because people on the street would have missed the difference with the previous model and thus desirability would have not increased. But now they show some genius: no way to mistake this watch for the previous model! Size will be perfect for the actual trend of smaller watches, it's vintage inspired (let's say like Oris Sixty-five or Tudor BB 58), it has a history of his own and a mythical movement. And it looks fabulous! On the previous video you complained that Omega still looking over the fence to Rolex's yard and here you're served: overpriced wonderful watch with old technology but high pedigree. I'm not sure that Omega will go through the entire AD drama, but to me it's clear that the Swatch group wants Omega to be on par with Rolex. It would give them the added advantage to free up some market segment to revive -hopefully- the Zenith brand. I should probably buy a Moonwatch as soon as possible, because I can foresee Omega list prices to go up and up an up...

@robertn3121

4 жыл бұрын

Michele Milanese With continued bonehead pricing decisions like this one, Omega will never cross the bridge to Rolex.

@michelemilanese2487

4 жыл бұрын

@A. B. I'm sure you're right, but it doesn't show. Apart from the Sky-dweller and the Yacht-Master II they have no complications and they're still charging for a day-date complication that you can find in any watch. They're pretty accurate, but they are not the only ones: my Hamilton Khaki with a basic ETA runs within Rolex specifications. There's no doubt that my Khaki it's very lucky but it proves that you don't need rocket science to build an accurate mechanism. Rolex are well made, but not on par with any real high end piece, like Lange or Patek. From a design standpoint they are stuck in the 60's: still the most iconic watches you can find and I would totally buy an old Sub or an Explorer, but everything they did in the last years was "select"->"resize" and with less than elegant results. If I have to really find any innovation I would say the Rolesor league and some nice clasps. If they put a LOT of money on that they seriously need to fire someone in the R&D department. But I'd love to be proven wrong: if you can tell me something more I'm glad to learn.

Somebody ought to send Omega to the moon. RIP Jackie

If you’ve spent 14k on a sub or gmt master II then it seems misplaced to complain about the price tag of this piece... I think they nailed it. Seems like everyone complains about the new Omega pricing bc the older models were such a steal in comparison to Rolex pricing. I’d be much more excited to see this piece on someone’s wrist than your common Rolex and maybe Omega stops overproducing their models which will create the higher value retention. It’s easier to spend this price if it retains its value on the secondary market..that’s for damn sure.

2:10 Just to clarify, both CK2998 (aka 1st Omega in space) and Speedmaster Pro (aka moonwatch) measure 39.7mm bezel to bezel. Omega designate the Pro as 42mm because it includes the crown guard. Go to a dealer and try both on side by side, you won't find the Pro wearing any larger than CK2998.

It certainly is the price increase when compared to the 1861 Moonwatch, but it seems much more reasonable due to the movement and especially when you compare to the same movement [or similar] in the much more expensive luxury watches. Also bear in mind “The movement is plated in Sedna gold. Note that these Calibre 321s are produced in a dedicated department in Biel, assembled and adjusted by hand by a single watchmaker. As such, don’t expect the same level of production as the classic Calibre 1861.” The materials are much stronger, the hand made assembly and adjustment, sedna gold used, investment in dedicated department and tools etc. For me is expensive but I see the reason. And finally, please do not mention the Rolex - they are doing nothing when comparing to OMEGA. Maybe OMEGA did some mistakes but at least they are innovating and doing a lot of great things. Rolex is marketing only. You are the Rolex fan - ok, but please do not criticize other brands for doing good things. If, in your opinion it is too expensive, do not buy it. Many people will do. You are not objective in your materials, sorry to say that. For more information about 321 please see monochrome-watches.com/omega-speedmaster-moonwatch-321-stainless-steel-ed-white/

it's a great re-imagination of the original... no complaints.

Nice information thanks , my view is if some will pay 14k for a used batman then this is not unreasonable for a hand assembled unique piece . ⏱👌

Another watch i can't get for list price, only those on the VIP list will get the Speedy 321 at list this year! End of the year you can get on the normal waiting list according to my dealer!

Hi Oisin. Can you please do a follow up review on the Ed White 321 now that it’s almost three years. Curious to see what you think now. Thank you.

You sir are a fountain of good knowledge, thanks for the video 👏👏👍

DUDE! I absolutely dig your show!!!

Isn't Omega moving towards the 3861 to replace the 1861? The way Omega is moving towards more and more METAS certified watches, I doubt they will ever put the 321 in a mass produced watch like the Speedy Pro.

I’d like to just be able to send my hesalite moon watch in to Omega and have them replace the 1861 movement with a 321; simple solution : p

All I want in a Speedmaster...321, slim case, step dial, flat links - but at that price I can find and I would want an original!

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed

Which is more numerous, the various iterations of Omega's Speedmaster, or JLC's multiple versions of their Reverso? 😆😆😆

i think they did good and vintage wtches with 321 should sky rocket....well done omega

Man! Been watch your Mr North vids. Jeez you guys are freaking amazing! “Let me in” is amazing. Among other songs. Saw all the renditions of the song. Loved the version where you play bass through the whole song. Then I heard the 2007 NY orchestrated version! Wow! Just wow.

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Hector! Yeah, the production of that 2007 show was crazy.

@WINDINGCROWNS

4 жыл бұрын

@The Timeless Watch Channel , you still play? If so I’d love to hear! Or even see live. It’s ridiculously good. I love all type of music but hardly ever does something just wow me instantly. I heard the first few bars and loved it instantly. Then the transitional section came in and I knew the chorus was going be great. It’s well written (formatted) from start to finish. Plus your crazy bass playing just great! Loved it.

4 жыл бұрын

@@WINDINGCROWNS Less playing these days. Colin sings backup with Christina Aguilera, my bro (on guitar) did a long stint with Enrique Iglesias and now does TV stuff and production. I'm doing production too. Just finished a large production 6 months ago. Hence the time off and birth of watch channel. Ha!

@WINDINGCROWNS

4 жыл бұрын

The Timeless Watch Channel , awesome! You are very talented. I wish u well.

I'm very happy having a 105.012 for 25 years on my wrist. Best regards Edgar

They will never put the 321 in the vanilla speedmaster. Its a more laborious movement and will go in separate models. Read multiple articles about it.

The first omega in space ( actually worn on space walk) by ed white is is 105.003 . Its the first omega used and tested by nasa before being adopted as Nasa, official watch . The fist omega worn on the moon was the 105.012. . Both use cal 321. The ed white is the pioneer of omegas space watches being the ones actually tested for space flight by Nasa. But the price they asking is crazy

Love it....u could argue that the size is a bit on the small side - however this watch is a perfect edt. Price is superb - quality it stunning, it’s The best watch of the year

Another great and informative video. I got the same email and a separate one from my local Omega boutique. I shopped reading after I saw the price of the watch. Three times the price of a new moon watch seems really excessive.

Im a fan butat that price im just a stalker

I really really like that that Ed White's caseback does not have commemorative "first watch on the moon" garbage printed on it, at least in those mock up shots.

Good update bro. Not even looking at it for anything more than 8K. Hopefully Omega wises up when and if they ever release the real thing.

I will just wear my 2017 Speedmaster MOTM thanks

LOL! Rolex fan boy saying "My God, Omega is releasing a steel column wheel chronograph, no precious metal, for 13'400€. Is it not crazy?" Hum.... Remind me the price of a steel Daytona without any precious metal? Is the steel Daytona at least prettier? So for the same price, I go for this new Omega, it looks amazing (only the value extension is unbeatable in the Daytona).

@robertn3121

4 жыл бұрын

BobGolob And that Omega will lose 25-30% of its value the moment it is sold, unlike the Rolex.

@BobGolob

4 жыл бұрын

@@robertn3121 that is something I am wondering. The usual speeddy will look less attractive for sure but not this one. It all depends of how many 321 will be produced in the future. Rescently all limited edition speedy gained in value, even the full gold speedy moonshine. But it is not about the money, it is about the passion.

@robertn3121

4 жыл бұрын

BobGolob I own a Sapphire Sandwich and I love it. The problem with Omega (and I own 3) is that their idea if a “limited production” is about 1 million and it kills value. This watch, as nice as it is, won’t hold value. But, I agree, it is about the passion. I just think this particular passion is over priced.

@BobGolob

4 жыл бұрын

@@robertn3121 in fact its price is similar to the price of a wintage one. I would have loved it was 8000€ but the market dictates it. Unfortunately. But if the price is decreasing, i will be glad to buy it pre-owned, but I m not convinced it will.

Yeah, the AD in Naples, FL told me this was coming. I told him your idea and he agreed.

I don't think Omega have made bad mistakes over the past few years as you put in your video. Yes we all want the Speedmaster with a 321 movement in steel. You may think they should have put in the 50th moon watch.. They where never going to do that. They would have lost sales. They sold every 50th moon watch and its gone up in value. why because it was a stunning watch and there where more people wanting it than the numbers. This new Ed white .. will not be the last 321 .. the 42 mm one will come and it will be £14- 15,000, I predict. why.. There will be a waiting list for the new ed white of at least 2 - 3 year by the end of this year Why. because they will limit the numbers and there will be enough people in the world willing to pay the price. As people are daft enough to keep buying Rolexs at inflated prices due the the company limiting the numbers they produce. regards. Dave

The problem with Omega is simply that they have been overshadowed by Rolex. If they release an amazing watch for €6/7000 people will say ‘sure I could get a submariner for that(if I wait 5 years).....if they bring out an exquisite watch for €15,000 people will say ‘sure I can get a Daytona for that (if I wait 5.6 billion light years)🙄

Great review. Thanks. You have to wonder how much they will charge if they bring out a remake of the original.

Beautiful watch. I’d love to also just get that bracelet for my standard speedy. I hate the OEM speedy bracelet. This Watch would never replace my speedy moon watch but might make a nice addition to the collection...... at maybe half the price. I honestly don’t get what’s going on with Watch prices. Watch prices are going up exponentially but my salary doesn’t. Who is possibly going to pay this kind of money for that? Beautiful as it may be....

This is priced absurdly and it shows you'd be better off buying the Speedmaster FOIS at under $4000 is actually a good deal.

@koolpep

4 жыл бұрын

Maybe that's their goal - but you won't get a movement made out of Sedna Gold (nobody asked for that though).

So this is a modified FOIS ? , I've picked one up a year ago and enjoy it ! . Love the vintage style bracelet on this new new release but the price is potty.

Having a watch that is built like it was when it first came out decades ago definitely carries a nostalgic vibe to it but...its not practical, which is why I would never buy one. Modern pieces are far superior to the watches of the past but yet so many people want them. When I first learned about the speedmaster I wanted one too but after my Hamilton field watch got magnetized I knew I had to do some homework. So I did and I ended up getting myself a DSotM in vintage black. Aside from the under the radar aesthetics: the new upgraded movement, the antimagnetism and the longevity upgrades that came with the watch are what sold me. I didnt pay the full price because I got it on jomashop but I still paid a hefty price for it and honestly 2 years later I think it was worth it, I wear it everyday. And for Omega to come out and pull a stunt like this charging $1k more on retail than a DSotM is completely obsurd! What were they thinking? Idiots! They obviously have selective hearing if the only thing they heard on the other video from the timeless watch channel was "make a throw back and and charge $1k more". SMH. They could have had people forming a line to buy a watch like this, and been making a ton of cash, had they done the job right form the get go. In my opinio they should be charging between 4.5k to 6k for this watch to get the attention that they want it to get. They need to clean up house in upper managment.

Nice video mate

861 went to space. During Apollo 17, Ron Evans got it personal 861 on his wrist surrounding the moon while Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt walked on the Moon with their 321. 861 flew on Skylab and Apollo Soyuz missions. It flew the very first STS Space Shuttle flights. ;o)

Funny how people go ape sh*t over the price. Dont forget omega had to revive 60year old movement with ultra accurate 3d scans etc and that whole thing must reflect in the price also. I agree, it is high price but my god what a watch, with a cal321.

Another top end video, as for the price of the Omega.....hard to comprehend the rationale / strategy of their marketing dept!

Sir, your vids and watch sense are bang on. Your channel is top of my list. How’s that gorgeous Sea Dweller treating you? I’d pay up for a two tone Rolex sub way before I pick up this Omega beauty. I’ll wait till the 321 moon watch comes out on DVD!

crazy prices @ Crazy Prices

I was honestly expecting you to say 6 grand. I'm glad I own mine, it's going nowhere. Cheers pal

Enjoyed the vid 👍 did I spot a Patek on your wrist?

I was SUPER interested in this as I much prefer this size and the bracelet. But WTF the price?!

Finally the correct movement for the watch that didn’t go to the moon they just said it did for decades. Got it:)

Last week arrive the one i order! Its not the same watch that went to the moon but it have the same movement and they did in a more elegante package, i prefer the almost 40mm than the 42mm and is hand made.

US prices vary from (over the phone) $13,800 to listed on the website of $14,100. Just what I’ve heard from actual sales people. Gorgeous watch and this one is definitely the one to get over the 50th Anniversary Moon Landon “Special Edition.”

@CapitanTavish

4 жыл бұрын

Robert Schmidt are y crazy the 50th is the best watch I ever saw

Are they even trying to sell this watch?! Nice watch but damn...

Far too high price. That's not far off the retail cost of an aquanaut, how much hand finishing are they giving you? I can see a bit of anglage.

9:01 Well.. there is the cost of, essentially, recreating the 321 mechanism production line as well as, probably, redesigning the mechanism to go into a modern production process etc. They need to recover the costs for all that and at the same time continue selling the other mechanisms so it has to be a limited production run and thus a high price watch for very few collectors. It is the Omega fans that asked for the 321 in the first place so Omega obliged. It is not the other way around. Whether it makes sense to buy it, well one has to ask themselves why they are buying a mechanical watch n the first place and what they expect from it and then take it from there. But all the points brought up in the video are valid and one should take them into consideration before buying this Speedmaster or any other Speedmaster for that matter.

I think Yr Comments are, as always, Spot-On. This is just A Rippoff. WHY do Omega do this Faux Patina Schtik? The 321 movement is a Fossil. It beats at 18K P.H. is not particularly accurate & HEY! The Precious Column-Wheel does not reset with the 100% accuracy the 861/1861 does. My Watchmaker was Right on The Money when he said; "Resurrecting the 321 movement is like Resurrecting Lazurus wth a Triple Bypass!" And WHY do it with Sapphires? AAAAARRRRRGHHH! A feature of the standard solid-case Omega Moonwatch IS- The soft-iron anti-magnetic cap, which sits on top of the movement when the caseback is removed. With the Sapphire Sandwich, they don't use this! I have owned/own 4 Speedmasters. The 861 is/was the BEST Speedmaster movement. This is just A Ca$h-Cow Show-Pony!

Thanks for the comments. I agree that at this price point, this Omega would be far down the list for consideration.

List of Omega Moonwatches apart from other chronographs 1) cal.1863 with Hesalite crystal, 2) cal. 1863 with sapphire, 3) Cal. 9300, 4) cal. 321 remake, 5) the infinite other limited editions Rolex has 1 Daytona in few configurations, Rolex never looks back to churn money from the designs of yesteryear, and their current caliber and design are always the best they had so far. I used to love Omega when I started my watch collecting journey but now I have so much respect for what Rolex does, it is more than just marketing.

im buying one tomorrow 26/11/21 worth every penny ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Great video. I have a question. Why we see brands such as Omega, Patek and Audermars Piguet investing and launching time pieces with Turbillion movements, moon phase movements and Rolex, probably the most wanted brand, is not investing on complex models like those? Of course that we have the Sky Dweller, with an amazing movement. But it seems nothing compared with the other brands. Thanks a lot

LOVE THE INTRO MUSIC

This is a luxury moon watch aimed at the top end of the market in a more wearable size. If the new 321 movement fits in a smaller case I would rather have it one not that I have 14k spare. I don’t think Omega will put the 321 in a standard moon watch case at all. If Omega did it would tarnish the current moon watch and look too much like the standard moon watch. You can see by looking at the new 321 movement that it’s not some mass produced movement like the original one. It’s a small production run beautifully made show case movement done to a extremely high standard. I don’t think it’s a bad move at all by Omega and if anything they are making more good moves than bad ones. Rolex are too reserved and could do with making improvements quicker especially their movements and quality control. Omega are faster to improve things and try new things and sometimes try too many. I like them both and wouldn’t change either.

I’m getting one, price be damned.

Man, they just can't leave well enough along? Just make the Moon Watch with the 321. The price makes it the "The Over The Moon Watch".

@ahpadt

4 жыл бұрын

Rick Varsava its a limited edition movement. Wont go in the normal speedies.

i wonder if the bracelet would suite on the Standard 20mm moonwatch, probably not. but that would be dope

@ahpadt

4 жыл бұрын

maxolson 19mm lug width unfortunately

Said this somewhere else already. For half the money you can get an El Primero which is twice the watch a Speedmaster or a Daytona is.

I think Omega is just throwing spaghettis on the wall and seeing what will stick, can't blame them for that :D

Omega can charge whatever they want. Its their watch and they made it, so they have the right to decide what they want to charge. On the other hand, we the consumer have the right to decide if we want to throw this kind of money on a ordinary, basically Moonwatch look like, watch. For me, I know that I would never give my hard earned money for a corporate greed that feel they can charge whatever they want. Your opinion may vary and I respect that.

Hey Irish, is that Basilica Palladi PD sul muro? Just landed here after seeing your Basan del Grap vid with the 114060. Do you live in mangia gatti (VI) territory? I'm not far away from there .. Cheers / Salute !

4 жыл бұрын

heywoodf it’s the basilica di Vicenza. You going to Bassano?

@haywoodf

4 жыл бұрын

@ gm@iled U

Why the Sedna-Gold movement? That's why the watch is so expensive, plus the handmade process....

Does it come in a box bigger than the MOTM? For that sort of money you should get a free safe to put it in.

I'm after a new Omega, perhaps not that one!

this bracelet is gorgeous though. seems very much like the one on Apollo 11 50th anniversary version..

What are the chances of getting exactly this design (don’t mind 42 too size too) but with new 3861 ? Price is too high but hoping with 3861, it could be more affordable...

They are only going to make about 2000 321’s per year according to Fratello. The 321 needs extra attention from the watchmaker. I think the watch is cool. But they are asking A LOT for a watch that isn’t a close repro of something that was used. Kind of typical Omega, they give you some things, but then they do something like a sapphire case back.

I have a strange feeling that they're going to move away from the "moonwatch" all together. I feel like an new Speedy Pro is coming, with modern updates, and the modern "master chronometer" 3681 movement, and a hefty price increase to go with it. The original, with the hesalite and the 1861, might be discontinued all together.

Im hoping that this is just covering the R&D and tooling costs for a production run of the 321 (unlike previous limited editions) and we’ll see a £6-7k ‘proper’ Moonwatch at 44mm with Hesalite and 321 movement.

@justincoleman4133

4 жыл бұрын

Having read more about it, I think this should be called “The last watch on the Moon”.

If I had the money, I would buy this in a heartbeat over your favourite brand; I think we will see a lot of varieties of the 321 omegas, as they try to compete with Rolex

The price doesn’t surprise me for a hand assembled 1000-2000 321 Speedmasters. $13500.00 is just as much as a Daytona and if Omega runs out. You can still order one, and get it before you will ever see a Daytona. Also these “Ed White” RE-editions are not going to be common compared to how many Daytona’s are out there. Omega marks their prices to the max but it’s safe to say this watch is really worth $10k considering it’s hand assembled and I believe parts of the movement are in gold.

The original 321 was beating at 18,000 and 1861 at 21,600 and now the co-axial 3861 also beats at 21,600.

The price is ... heavy. But the watch is really beautiful. Amazing so to say. Bad decisions in the past or not. If Rolex could sell a steel chrono at this price point I don't see why Omega couldn't. I would even go more far with that. Demand and supply could make this watch one for the waiting list.

People are going to strain their eyes staring at the movement. 👁

It's a good looking watch but I would not pay 15k for it. I have mixed emotions about the deliberate patina markers. I want to see how it illuminates at night.

15k? Ouch. Anyway on another note UFC 246 this weekend hope Conor pulls it off!!! But back on to watches im about to pick up the Tudor Black Bay Heritage M79230R-0011 with the brown leather band beautiful watch

Sorry if it’s been previous asked (did watch your Q and As, but somewhat passively), but what are your glasses?! Screw the watches, I want those glasses! (I actually want the watches too...) Thanks. Love the channel.

4 жыл бұрын

Armani.

Speedy Tuesday 👍

All I know is my Speedmaster keeps going up in value

What is so expensive about 321 and column wheel? Even longines and seiko chronographs use column wheels at less than motm. as much as i love omega and speedy, they are frustrating their customers.

it is hand assembled by one watch maker from start to finished! only done by other brands like AP PP VC. So i think its great out of my price range but just because it out of my price rang doesn't make it over priced people complaining should stick to paying over retail for their rolexes because no one is up in arms about that hahahaha

What watch are you wearing in this video??

4 жыл бұрын

;)

@ironglen

4 жыл бұрын

@ I believe that's another new watch lol

Dear, it's time to order and review a Corgeut Chronograph (an Omega Speedmaster Reduced meca-quartz homage from AliE) and blow again the net as you did (very very well) with the Pagani Design watches. You wished something and Omega did it for you ☺️ I'm looking at my Corgeut on my wrist and I'm smiling thinking "C'mon, Oisin, do it again..." 😉

@danlugo4365

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the heads up on that! I'll have to grab one

@ret01101

4 жыл бұрын

@@danlugo4365 Usually $55, but I got it under $50. Worth every penny. Seiko VK63 movement. Very accurate having sweeping chrono hand. And above all this the watch is a nodate 40mm having poor lume, but very legible dial and hands even in dim light conditions. Vater resistance 30m.

@danlugo4365

4 жыл бұрын

@@ret01101 Saw the Bliger "homage" and it looks awesome. The corguet looks a lot like the Speedmaster Reduced