My family is currently attending adult catechism and my priest suggested we read about St. Ignatius. This presentation is wonderful. What a great teacher the speaker is. Very succinct and knowledgeable of history. Thank you.

I love the beauty and the truth of the Catholic church! 💕

@pap2-371

5 жыл бұрын

do you love the truth of the catholic church that is coming out now, its many year of abusing children?

It's interesting how people will totally and stubbornly ignore the writings and teachings of the early church fathers who learned "directly" and "personally" from the apostles yet believe and follow the teachings of the reformers who were 1500 years removed from the apostles. Go figure.

@pap2-371

8 жыл бұрын

+vic zamora Vic did you ever read your bible the reformers were reforming because the rcc does not teach the Bible. Read Paul's Epistles we are save by grace through faith. Paul was not 1500 years removed. Read Peter's 2nd Epistle where he talks about Paul's teaching being the truth. I pray the LORD God gives you eyes to see and ears to hear and the same to Ben Fisher

@GeorgeLiavas

7 жыл бұрын

and then in 1054 the catholic church schism from orthodoxy because they added the filioque, and pope wanted economic supremacy. how sad. Since the the catholic church has created protestantism and ridiculous canons ex. Vatican I,II. Infalibilty?really?really? Is the pope God? No he is not. Thats why there were ecumenical councils. With all the patriarchs who would decide things by the holy spirit. Not one person. The catholic church has derailed from the original church. Return to orthodoxy. Im not trying to insult. we are all brothers in christ. But the history is obvious.

@ultimouomo11

7 жыл бұрын

I think you need to read the Eastern Fathers to see what they believed ebougis.wordpress.com/my-eastern-papist-florilegium/

@ultimouomo11

7 жыл бұрын

Eastern Fathers on the Primacy of Peter www.fisheaters.com/easternfathers.html

@johnb4632

7 жыл бұрын

Pap 2-3; True we receive his grace not through merits of our own but; you will be judged on your works. Roman 2:6 Eccle 12:14 Matthew 16-27 .... the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels: and then will he render to every man according to his works.

...excellent presentation.. thank you....

THANK GOD for this enlightenment. This video has strengthened more of my faith as a Catholic.

@richardosborne2067

5 ай бұрын

Do you really think the catholic church is anything like those days.Quess the proof is in the fruit of the history

This guy does an awesome job! He makes a great teacher! Thanks so much for posting!,

Thanks for the detail explanation catholicsm, time has come to evangelise protestants to bring them home back

This is a wonderful introduction!

Thank you friend for the enlightment , may God use you and bless you , stay humble 💗💗💗

3 AM is the witching hour! If someone woke you up at that time and tried to stop your conversion, they are surely motivated by dark powers. Good on you to keep your studies and conviction. Great presentation!

@emeteriobarcelon4659

5 жыл бұрын

Trump

This was a very good presentation. Very powerful and proves the exactly what catholic church believes and teaches is directly from the apostolic times. Protestants need to study church history and then assess how far their teachings are from the first century church.

@ultimouomo11

7 жыл бұрын

Just wondering, WHEN was the KJV "given by inspiration of God"? was it 1611, or any of the KJV major/minor revisions in 1613, 1629, 1638, 1644, 1664, 1701, 1744, 1762, 1769, and the last one in 1850? And which one do you use?

@lindabrown6578

7 жыл бұрын

Sorry but you got wrong info!

@lindabrown6578

7 жыл бұрын

1 Corinthians 12:28 "God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers" So God says, the Bible says, the word of God says these are the people who will lead us to the truth John 14:16 "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever." That means then and now not just one generation, or the doctrine of infallibility forever. the Son, and of the Matthew 28:19"Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world." Now this proves this authority was passed on because the apostle could not live "unto the end of the world." Also note they were told to teach all nations not to pass out Bibles for people to do this on their own without the aid of Jesus' Church to decide what is true or false

@johnb4632

7 жыл бұрын

Justin C; Very arrogant and you show great ignorance to go against 2000 years of history.So in Matthew Christ said Peter will build MY church.Whose church yours lol. What church do you belong too. Or did you start your own lol. It was Catholics who put the bible together excluding all the heresies. Matthew 16 16-18 Simon Peter answered and said: Thou art Christ, the Son of the living God. 17And Jesus answering, said to him: Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in heaven. 18And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

@johnb4632

7 жыл бұрын

Justin C; Way to kill some dabate. Matthew 16:27 27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels: and then will he render to every man according to his works.

After listing to several talks on Ignatius I believe this is the best.

Why aren't more people watching this? Catholic converts are the most knowledgeable Catholics

@RumorHazi

5 жыл бұрын

Asaph Vapor Deceived by whom?

@RumorHazi

5 жыл бұрын

Asaph Vapor That’s absolutely ludicrous. The Catholic Church gave you Scripture. Doubt it?? Who wrote Hebrews? How do you know it to be inspired? Ever hear of the Book of Thomas? The Gospel of Peter? Do you know why they are NOT in Scripture? On that same note, how is it you know which 27 books were to be included in the New Testament? There is no “Table of Contents”. Sooooo, if you believe that the New Testament which you now hold is (1) Inspired and (2) the correct list of books, then you are acknowledging the tacit authority of the Catholic Church. How does that feel? It’s ok, you’re not the first.

@pap2-371

5 жыл бұрын

@@RumorHazi how did the roman catholic church give us scripture?

@RumorHazi

5 жыл бұрын

Pap 2-3 Are you questioning the Ecumenical Councils which led to the Canon of Scripture which is recognized by Christians around the world?

@RumorHazi

5 жыл бұрын

Pap 2-3 Unless of course the Council of Rome under Pope Damasus I didn’t exist and this Bible you now conveniently hold just fell out of the sky. That’s a possibility I guess.

with God, there is forgiveness!!! In my nothingness lower than the dust! God bless you all. Thanks for sharing

Satans masterpiece was the splitting of The one true Church JC intended. Thanks to Luther the Protestants now have 33,000 different denominations. Could you imagine the power we could have as Christians if we could unite under our Lord and Savior? Can we put the hate to rest? It’s been over 500 years

@SMaamri78

3 жыл бұрын

As a southern Baptist, I have always been baffled by many evangelicals dislike of the catholic church. I view Catholics as my brothers and sisters in Christ and have the utmost respect for them.

The "...big heavy hammer of history." Is that your quote? History must be a sobering moment for non-Catholic Christians. Good presentation.

@dieselcowboy777

3 жыл бұрын

No much of history was written as a lie because our true Pentecostal fathers were non trinitarians who baptized in the name of Jesus Christ....that's why most of the churches were non trinitarians in the 1st and 2nd centuries

@dieselcowboy777

3 жыл бұрын

History was written inaccurately by these liars .....they condemned the truth as heresy and called their lies orthodox

@user-uc1yb7hy2n

3 жыл бұрын

@@dieselcowboy777 do you agree with the Arian position? And I’m asking sincerely. I know that doesn’t always come across in these conversations.

@dieselcowboy777

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-uc1yb7hy2n i don't know what the arian position is

@user-uc1yb7hy2n

3 жыл бұрын

@@dieselcowboy777 I believe the Arian position was Christ was created out of nothing therefore had a beginning. Athanasius took the opposing view stating that the son was begotten by the father having no beginning. Both these men used various scripture passages. I just asked because you’ve contributed in conversations. It seems you don’t like the outcome of the council of Nicaea and I was wondering if you thought Arius was right. Anyhow I hope I didn’t misrepresent your position. God bless.

I wish he had edited himself as to the opening comments, but I'm glad for the teaching being here. Hopefully someone will be their eyes open to the Truth. Thank you.

@dieselcowboy777

3 жыл бұрын

They are both married to satan....they are both Satan's kindom....(roman Catholicism and greek orthodox) They are the fulfillment of Daniel's interpretation of nebuchadnezzars dream... The 4th world empire is rome....and pagan rome didn't become divided to form the 2 legs of the image... It wasn't until Constantine married the church to rome which is the seat of satan....then it became papal rome ....it was then that it became the church of satan... Then it divided to form the 2 legs ....roman Catholicism representing the western nations and Greek orthodox representing the eastern nations.... They are both Satan's kingdom....and Satan's kingdom is divided and won't stand....it will be destroyed... I find it fitting that it is prophecied that it will be russia that will destroy the Vatican satanic cult....so it will probably be a russian Greek orthodox man that will be used to bring an end to Satan's kingdom here on earth....the King of the north..... I noticed something odd in scripture...it references the King of the north with a capital K.....and when the scripture talks about the kings of the east it is with a lower case k.....so what i noticed is that russia and china have an alliance together....and when you put the King of the North together with the kings of the east....you have a political King of kings in a manner of speaking....just something to think about

@row1landr

2 жыл бұрын

@@dieselcowboy777 lies. You are the mouth of Satan . We pray you repent and come to the truth.

Thank u very much

what's the speaker's name?? He is awesome....would love to hear more of his talks.

@tinjustusmartin3520

3 жыл бұрын

Ben Fisher 🙋🏻‍♂️

Wonderful

God bless Ben Fisher.....

Thank you very much .... God bless you ...

Ben Fisher is amazing! 🇻🇦🙋🏻‍♂️

Very good

Check out this video and the videos that follow. Good stuff here!! :)

@Jeremiah17v9

9 жыл бұрын

DancesWithBears Saving for later. Thanks.

Hello, excellent presentation! Please where did you get your information from? I love history and need very often to refute non catholics, may you recommend some solid books?

Anyone knows the name or collection of this books? Amazon has different ones and not sure what to buy. 🙏

What are the sources that shows the bishops requested John to write the gospel?

@albadi1313

4 жыл бұрын

I'm from eastern church and I heard this in our tradition as well. Don't know the actual source.

20:6 And God said unto him in a dream, Yea, I know that thou didst this in the integrity of thy heart; for I also withheld thee from sinning against me: therefore suffered I thee not to touch her. Genesis

And now we know SSPX held up to Tradition!

What year of vehicle is that sweety

Very well done! How can anyone be a protestant after listing to this?

@yoperau9823

Жыл бұрын

Reading the Bible, makes you protestant, or a real Christian. Everything in the Bible is against the traditions of the catholic or orthodox church. Also, any so-called protestant denominations.

Catholic is a Greek word means universal.

@Sraheens1

3 жыл бұрын

Complete.

What's traffics synching acomplish

11:49 yes 👍

43:00 is all you need to know. It is The Church.

Thanks for posting these--very interesting. However, there is an etymological fallacy that is repeated several times throughout the series: While it is true that the English word "priest" derives from the Greek πρεσβύτερος (presbuteros), it is *NOT* true that the Greek word πρεσβύτερος (presbuteros) means priest. The Greek word for priest is ἱερεύς (hiereus). πρεσβύτερος (presbuteros) means an old man, elder, or senior. Also, the word ἐπίσκοπος (episkopos) is a synonym for πρεσβύτερος (presbuteros) in New Testament usage.

@gdloamx

5 жыл бұрын

the word doesn't translate exactly to priest but the history of the early church definitively displays that the office of bishop priest and deacon were defined and in use in accord to their function as they were being carried out in the early church. we get the best communications toward the end of the 2nd century due to the easing of persecution and the prevalence in writing at that time. But not just the history but the typology as well shows this to be so. if Jesus gave authority to the Apostles that he didn't give to ALL his followers and Jesus is the High priest and He lives in them as he and his father are one then these Apostles are acting in a priestly function authorized by Jesus himself. Jesus washes the feet of the 12 just as Moses washed the first priests of the tribes of Israel. The old testament shows us that the priesthood was integral in the worship life of Israel and so to it is integral in the new testament. This is the history of the church it is undeniable. The liturgy was being prayed long before the new testament scriptures were being written. in fact the New testament was 'The sacrament' long before it became a document. (this quote is from 'minorityvoice' that commented right below your comment...it would have taken me a lot of time to do the same...)

@str.77

5 жыл бұрын

Your etymologies are correct - except for the part that claims that episkopos necessarily is a synonym for presbyteros. Note that the words appear mostly in Paul's letters, hence written at a time the Apostles were still around to oversee all the local churches. Their death of course changed matters. Either the Apostles already appointed episkopoi alongside the presbyteroi (or as a special class of episkopoi) or some of the presbyteroi filled the void left by the Apostles, assuming that word. Also note, that there is one occurence of the word episkopos outside of Paul's letters. Acts 1, 20 talks about the ramifications of the death of Judas and quotes the Psalms "Let his habitation become desolate, and let there be no one to live in it"; and "His office let another take." What the RSV here translates as "office" in Greek actually is epicopate, showing that episkopoi and Apostle were indeed linked at least in the mind of Luke, who wrote the passage, but possibly also in the minds of the Apostles.

@paulgundrum9059

2 жыл бұрын

Regardless of meaning, the Presbuteros referred to is a single person leading the Church (which You can argue is the Priest of the Church). Bishops & Priests generally being older would lend weight to the Presbyter and Episcopal being Priests & Bishops rather than just old dudes (or the Evangelical notion of Elders).

The speaker is a priest?

Believe in god😇

According to the official Vatican List of Popes, St. Linus was the 2nd Pope followed by St. Anacletus, then St. Clement...there is some debate, but the official list has St. Clement as the 4th Pope...just a nitpick.

If the Catholic Church is so holy, I really wish to see what they think about all the killings soo soo many.

"The whole story of Ignatius is more legendary than real, and his writings are subject to grave suspicion of fraudulent interpolation." (History of the Christian Church, Philip Schaff, Vol 2, ch 4)

@Prancer1231

9 жыл бұрын

confused353 If you people can't refute the truth, you always claim "fraud" or "forgery."

@KyleInOklahoma

8 жыл бұрын

+confused353 Its amazing how blind some ppl are. A lot of these documents thats in the public domain did not come from Christians but from either roman historians or Jewish historians, and Greek. Look at, for example, Justin Martry's apologia to Marcus Arylius which he explains the Mass, because we,re been persecuted for been cannibals cause they heard we were eating real flesh and drinking real blood. Do you say there was a Jewish conspiracy with the Christians..This thinking is so sad..Come on man-If you are not open to the idea that you might be wrong then your NOT Christian as a christian is always pushing forward in the TRUTH...

the word doesnt translate exactly to preist but the history of the early church definitively displays that the office of bishop priest and deacon were defined and in use in accord to their function as they were being carried out in the early church. we get the best communications toward the end of the 2nd century due to the easing of persecution and the prevalence in writing at that time. But not just the history but the typology as well shows this to be so. if Jesus gave authority to the Apostles that he didnt give to ALL his followers and Jesus is thw High preist and He lives in them as he and his father are one then these Apostles are acting in a presitly function authorized by jesus himself. Jesus washes the feet of the 12 just as Moses washed the firat preists of the tribes of Israel. The old testament shows us that the preisthood was integral in the worship life of Israel and so to it is integral in the new testamnet. This is the history of the church it is undeniable. The liturgy was being prayed long before the new teatament scriptures were being written. in fact the New testament was a sacramentthe eucharist long before it became a document.

@CHEKPNT

5 жыл бұрын

well I dont think they could even use the word Priest around that time... it would confuse everyone cuz they might think they were talking about Jeeish Temple priest...

Objectively most of these men from the end of the 1st century till Nicea in 325AD were influenced by Hellenistic philosophy which was spearheard by Jewish Philo of Alexandria. Proof is their take on the 'Logos' which John ( being an unlettered and ordinary man', Acts 4:13) would not have had in mind the pre christian concept of 'logos' as 'reason' e.t.c. but merely focused on 'The Son of God' a real person who lived alongside his Father in heavan. John said regarding the 'Word' "We had a view of his glory, a glory that belong to an ONLY BEBOTTEN SON FROM A FATHER" ( John 1L14) Just read the writings of Origon, Atanasius & Augustine and they are riddled with philosophy closer to plato than the NT in so many ways! ( Acts 20:30)

Are you in ant city council

his description on gnosticism is incomplete and incorrect.

A good talk but I have one or two bones to pick with the "presbyteros means priest" issue. While the English word "priest" derives from the Greek "presbyteros" they do not mean the same. "Presbyteros" means "elder". The Apostles chose to appoint elders in various churches. Even in the Jerusalem church, they were elders present at the Apostle's council. "Presbyter" is sort of a compromise if "elder" sounds too mundane. If any Bible translation do translate the word not as "priest" it is not necessarily because they want to push Protestantism but because translating it as "priest" creates a translation conundrum: if we translate both presbyter as well as hiereus/sacerdos/kohen as priest, it looks to the English reader that the same word is used when it isn't. I would be totally in favour of translating presbyter as priest if there was an English word for the hiereus/sacerdos/kohen. Alas, there isn't because Christianity has been so successful in shaping the language with our terminology. Finally, this conundrum also resulted in one of Luther's heresies, the "priesthood of all believers". Actually, it is a Biblical and Catholic truth that all believers are annointed as kings, priests and prophets. As believers we all share in Christ's priestly office. However, we do NOT share in any presbyter-ship. But since we have only word for it in English, Luther and his followers easily fooled many that there as a "presbytership of all believers" and the sacramental office of deacon, presbyter and bishop should be done away with.

@str.77

5 жыл бұрын

@Asaph Vapor False? I wrote that "presbyteros" means "elder". However there is no basis for your claim "it was falsely used" as the word was used by the Catholic Church even in the New Testament. Who are you to tell the Church that she can't use this word? Also, the Church didn't tell the English or German language: don't develop a word that could translate as "sacerdos/kohen".

Another presupposition of the speaker is that, because the Apostolic Fathers "knew" the Apostles, that means their teaching accurately reflect the Apostles beliefs. If you read the Bible itself, it'll tell you that Christianity had already begun the process of corruption during the lifetime of the apostles themselves. The apostle John said he was the last remaining pillar of truth in the congregation.

@CPATuttle

Жыл бұрын

The Bible says to follow the church for the pillar of truth 1 Timothy 3:15. The last verse in the Gospel of John also says Jesus said too much for it all to be written

@billybobdinges8104

4 ай бұрын

Just think now. There are 200 variations of Christianity. The devil keeps getting into these peoples and they keep changing it and changing it and interpret it a certain way. I do believe there are many holy people over time and many holy people have vision and God speaks to many of these people. But the Lord will let you know what is what and what is it if man's involved it's corrupt. The devil runs rampant . And I believe he got to you too

Antioch god securety 30 thou yr

I have read Ignatius, and conclude his writings has been modified. It also is very possible he was a part of the house of Israel. So the claim he would have been alive after AD 73 would be false. It is difficult to know for certain, since so little was written about him. But based on his writings alone, it suggests he would have been a part of the house of Israel and not alive after AD 73 (Matthew 23:38 fulfilled in AD73). The strange obsession I see with the usage of the word “bishop” suggests his writings have been modified.

@jeffscully1347

Жыл бұрын

You conclude? Why would anyone believe or trust your conclusions? What are your credentials?

@soteriology400

Жыл бұрын

@@jeffscully1347 There are two versions of his writings. Only 7 btw have been accepted, the rest are too controversial as they seem to be modified (don’t take my word for it). When I read the letter written to Polycarp, seems odd he is writing to Polycarp about Polycarp (towards the end of the letter). I also see a strange obsession with the word “bishop” that does not seem natural nor normal. Very odd when comparing to the writings of the apostles. As far as my credentials, I have a natural inclination to be strong in hermeneutics. Such as paying close attention to chronology, time indicators, audience relevance, grammar, setting and of course original language of the scriptures. I am the first person in history to figure out when their gathering took place (fulfillment of Ezekiel 37), as well as when the 1335 day prophecy took place (Daniel 12:12) as well as their last day. I have the timeline on my channel if you care to look at it.

What Greek scholarship supports the idea that "presbuteros" means "priests?" 1 Timothy 4:14 uses the Greek word "presbuterion" in the context of ordained clergy which literally means, "Elders" or "Overseers." The NAS Exhaustive Concordance says that "presuberion" is "from presbuteros - Definition: a body of elders, council of the elders, presbytery."

@globalimpactministries766

7 жыл бұрын

The author is encouraging Catholics to get a Bible based upon the Latin Vulgate rather than from the original Greek text from which the NT was originally written. The later Roman Catholic Church

@HJKelley47

7 жыл бұрын

I was also wondering how he got the word 'priests' out of the Greek word "presbuteros". The Greek word for 'priest' is the word 'hiereus'. According to how Clement wrote to the Church in Corinth, sounds like this gentleman is part of the "Church of God that sojourns in Rome". That does not speak of the rest of the "Church of God that sojourns" elsewhere! Please do not put your non-Roman Catholic Bibles in the closet--big mistake. Actually I might encourage you to purchase a New Testament Interlinear (Greek/English) & an Old Testament Interlinear (Hebrew/English).

@carlershag7515

7 жыл бұрын

priest comes from the word presbyteros, which literary means elder. bishop comes from episcopos which literary means overseer

@carlershag7515

7 жыл бұрын

the hierus is the priest in the temple

@carlershag7515

7 жыл бұрын

but the etymology of the word ”priest” is still that its from ”presbutros”

you missed the Eastern Orthodox Church.

I love the presentation but πρεσβύτερος (presbuteros) doesn't mean Priest ...it means Elder.

Why 3am?...coincidence?

@str.77

5 жыл бұрын

It's 3 am eternal...

We know for a fact by the Old Testament that there were priests, so of course there were priests in the New Testament, They were the ones who offered sacrifice, Catholics and orthodox both have priests so they have the Eucharist

@wendymitchell8245

4 жыл бұрын

Jesus was the last SACRIFICE AND THE END OF PRIESTS ,there are not any in the New Test. after him .

@marydolan587

4 жыл бұрын

truejustice what about Jesus command to his disciples to do this the breaking of the bread at the last supper in memory of me. Why wouldn't God want sacrifices offered to Him the New Testament is the fulfillment of the old. Sacrifice has always been part of worship.

@wendymitchell8245

4 жыл бұрын

@truejustice What facts .It would appear that you are the one with no wisdom or knowledge of the Bible or you would have read it and realised that it tells you to study for yourself .IT SAYS 'STUDY TO SHOW THEY SELF APPROVED OF GOD' 2 Tim.2:13. .The Apostles AUTHORITY NOW, IS IN WHAT THEY TAUGHT .That is the New Testament . 1Thess. 3:14. If any man obey not our word by this epistle ,note that man and have no company with him. 1 John 4 :6 We are of God ,he that knoweth God heareth US.

@wendymitchell8245

4 жыл бұрын

@truejustice give your reference for one place where there is the office of priest in the N.T. CHURCH .I would never preach to men in the church meeting, that is the job of qualified elders/ bishops THEY SHOULD BE MARRIED MEN WHO HAVE BROUGHT UP THEIR CHILDREN WELL. 1 Tim.3 :4, 5 . That does not mean women should be silent outside of the church meeting and not witness .They went with Paul speaking to people door to door. When some people know they are wrong they resort to rudeness.

As a Muslim , Unitarian christians have my respect . They will meet Jesus in heaven

U teach st peter is first bishop of Antioch. Then st Ignatius ordained by him.then who is the successor to them in Antioch now a days ie successor to st peter in Antioch. Is he Catholic? Under Roman pope??

@pap2-371

5 жыл бұрын

Sobin St Peter was an apostle never was he a bishop. There is also no proof he ever was a pope or in rome. Look for yourself.

@joecastillo8798

4 жыл бұрын

@@pap2-371 Pap, Your statement comes from either lack of knowledge or perhaps a lazy attitude towards historical facts. Church tradition maintains that the See of Antioch was founded by Saint Peter the Apostle in A.D. 34. As far as the Catholic Church is concerned the Church in Antioch was indeed founded by the Prince of the Apostles, St. Peter. He eventually moved on to found the See of Rome, where he was martyred for the faith and where his primacy was to remain. In other words, the gifts that the Apostle St. Peter received from Our Lord, were transferred to his successors at Rome and not to the successors of St. Peter at Antioch. St. Ignatius of Antioch, the successor of St. Evodious, was the active bishop of this region prior to the death of St. Peter while he was yet the Bishop of Rome. God bless.

@pap2-371

4 жыл бұрын

@@joecastillo8798 Joey there is no history facts there, there is just the Roman Catholic traditions. No fact Peter ever was in Rome let alone that he died there. No history fact that he was a bishop only an apostle. No history fact that Peter found any church let alone the church in Antioch. There is not even history that shows all the people named as popes were even in Rome. The Roman Catholic church has trouble with facts but it also has trouble with scripture. thank Joe but you have to have more than the word of the rcc. God bless you

@joecastillo8798

4 жыл бұрын

@@pap2-371 Reciting your opinions may give you comfort but not certitude of facts. Everything you wrote is someone else's opinion found in anti Catholic tracts. In stark contrast, there are thousands of writings from the First until the Fifteenth century that speak only of the Church founded by Christ, the Catholic Church; none speak of protestant variations, until 1521. Moreover, we are in posession of relics, writings and sites, as well as tombs of seven of the twelve Apostles located in Rome, starting with St. Peter, that easily prove our well deserved preeminence and veracity. In contrast, reflect on this fact: 99% of protestant churches and sects like yours, have been founded by men or women starting in the 20th century until now. BUT THERE IS ONLY ONE CHURCH FOUNDED BY CHRIST! REMEMBER? ●MATHEW 7, 21-24 21. “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who DOES THE WILL of my Father who is in heaven. WHAT IS GOD'S WILL? ●MATTHEW 16:18-19 18. And I tell YOU, YOU are PETER, and on THIS ROCK I will BUILD MY CHURCH, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it. . 19. I will GIVE YOU the KEYS of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you BIND on earth shall be BOUND in HEAVEN, and whatever you LOOSE on earth shall be LOOSED in HEAVEN.” THERE IS FULL AUTHORITY IN ONE CHURCH AND ONE CHURCH ONLY. ●MATTHEW 18:17 17. If he refuses to listen to them, tell the church. If he refuses to listen even to the CHURCH, then treat him as you would a Gentile or a tax collector. 18. Amen, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. ONLY ONE CHURCH HAS THE TRUTH: ●JOHN 16, 13 13. When the SPIRIT of TRUTH comes, He WILL GUIDE YOU INTO ALL THE TRUTH; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come. ●1 TIMOTHY 3:15 15 if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is THE CHURCH of the living God, THE PILLAR and FOUNDATION OF THE TRUTH. JESUS WANTS UNITY NOT DIVISION: ●JOHN 17:20-23 20. “I do not pray for these only, but also for those who believe in me through their word, 21. that THEY MAY ALL BE ONE; even as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. 22. The glory which thou hast given me I have given to them, that THEY MAY BE ONE even AS WE ARE ONE, 23. I in them and thou in me, that they may BECOME PERFECTLY ONE, so that the world may know that thou hast sent me and hast loved them even as thou hast loved me. ONLY ONE MAGISTERIUM SPEAKS FOR JESUS WITH ONE VOICE: ●LUKE 10:16 16. “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me. IN JESUS THERE CAN ONLY EXIST UNITY FOREVER: MATTHEW 28:19-20 19. Therefore go and make disciples of ALL NATIONS (Catholic), baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20. and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded YOU. And surely I AM WITH YOU ALWAYS, to the very end of the age.” ●Throughout this journey Jesus is constantly at our side. Not once did He leave His ONE TRUE CHURCH. Do you know why? BECAUSE HE GAVE HIS WORD! So, I ask you: Which is the true Church founded by Christ? Which is the only Church that has the ability to verify its claims, starting in the 1st. Century? Think hard! May God bless your discernment.

@joecastillo8798

4 жыл бұрын

@@pap2-371 Regarding your biased and poorly informed statement, copied from hidden sources, regarding the stanza of St. Peter in Rome, let me inform you that St. Paul was the first one that arrived in Rome. Saint Peter arrived later, after having been the Bishop of Antioch, which was left in the hands of St. Evodious, later replaced by St. Ignatius. St. Peter was careful not to reveal his whereabouts as he was the target of the Romans and anti Christian Jews. Thus, he speaks in: 1 Peter 5:13 The Church who is in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you her greetings, and so does my son Mark. (Where Babylon was the code word among Christians for the City of Rome) POST BIBLICAL WRITERS SECOND CENTURY: ▪︎ST. IRENAEUS OF LYON (c. 180-199 AD) The successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient Church known to all, founded and organized AT ROME by the two most glorious Apostles, Peter and Paul, that Church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the Apostles. FOR WITH THIS CHURCH, BECAUSE OF ITS SUPERIOR ORIGIN [or "preeminent authority"] ALL CHURCHES MUST AGREE, THAT IS, ALL THE FAITHFUL IN THE WHOLE WORLD; AND IT IS IN HER THAT THE FAITHFUL EVERYWHERE HAVE MAINTAINED THE APOSTOLIC TRADITION." [then follows a list of successors to Peter as bishops of Rome] (Against Heresies 3:3:1-3) Then follows a series of witnesses: ▪︎Tertullian (c. AD 197) speaks of Peter apart from Paul as ordaining Clement as his episcopal successor (De Praescrip Haer 32). THIRD CENTURY ▪︎The Poem Against Marcion (c. 200 AD) states how "Peter bad Linus to take his place and sit on the chair whereon he himself had sat" (III, 80). The word "chair" (cathedra) in ecclesiastical language always means one's episcopal throne (i.e. the bishop's chair). ▪︎Caius of Rome (214 AD) calls Pope Victor the thirteenth bishop of Rome after Peter (Euseb HE V, 28). ▪︎Hippolytus (225 AD) counts Peter as the first Bishop of Rome (Dict Christian Biog I, 577). ▪︎Cyprian (in 250) speaks of Rome as "the place of Peter" (Ep ad Anton), and as "the Chair of Peter" (Ep ad Pope Cornelius). ▪︎Firmilian (257) speaks of Pope Stephen's claim to the "succession of Peter" and to the "Chair of Peter" (Ep ad Cyprian). FOURTH CENTURY ▪︎Eusebius (314) says that Peter was "the bishop of Rome for twenty-five years" (Chron an 44), and calls Linus "first after Peter to obtain the episcopate" (Chron an 66). He also says that Victor was "the thirteenth bishop of Rome after Peter" (HE III, 4). ▪︎The Council of Sardica "honors the memory of the Apostle Peter" in granting Pope Julius I the right to judge cases involving other episcopal sees under imperial Roman law (Sardica Canon IV, and Ep ad Pope Julius). ▪︎Athanasius (340's) calls Rome the "Apostolic Throne" -- a reference to the Apostle Peter as the first bishop to occupy that throne (Hist Arian ad Monarch 35). ▪︎Optatus (370) says that the episcopal chair of Rome was first established by Peter, "in which chair sat Peter himself." He also says how "Peter first filled the pre-eminent chair," which "is the first of the marks of the Church." (Schism Donat II, 2 and II, 3). ▪︎Pope Damasus (370) speaks of the "Apostolic chair" in which "the holy Apostle sitting, taught his successors how to guide the helm of the Church" (Ep ix ad Synod, Orient ap Theodoret V, 10). Damasus also states how "The first See is that of Peter the Apostle, that of the Roman church" and says how Rome received primacy not by the conciliar decisions of the other churches, but from the evangelic voice of the Lord, when He says, "Thou art Peter..." (Decree of Damasus 382). May God bless your discernment.

What u cookn

Catholic Church the One True Church established by Christ. The Church is the pillar and foundation of truth 1 Timothy 3:15. Church came before the Bible. Impossible to follow solo scripture if NT books were debated as inspired and no Bible existed. Some non-inspired books were used by some churches in the liturgy. Un broken chain to St Peter and no one can disprove this. Jude 1:2,3 , John 20:30. Jude 1:17. and many verses command not everything is in scripture and more importantly maintain oral tradition of the Apostles. No other Church can trace their roots back to Peter less your Gnostic haha

What evidence is there that the original Greek texts says "priests?" J. B. Lightfoot's translation of Ignatius to the Ephesians CHAPTER 4 says "presbytery", not "priests." 4:1 So then it becometh you to run in harmony with the mind of the bishop; which thing also ye do. For your honourable presbytery, which is worthy of God, is attuned to the bishop, even as its strings to a lyre. Therefore in your concord and harmonious love Jesus Christ is sung.Roberts-Donaldson's translation of Ignatius to the Ephesians CHAPTER 4 also says "presbytery", not priests.4:1 Wherefore it is fitting that ye should run together in accordance with the will of your bishop, which thing also ye do. For your justly renowned presbytery, worthy of God, is fitted as exactly to the bishop as the strings are to the harp. Therefore in your concord and harmonious love, Jesus Christ is sung.The same is true with Ignatius' Epistle to Polycarp. I checked J. B. Lightfoot's Translation, Charles Hoole's translation, and Roberts-Donaldson's translation and all three translations say "presbytery." Here we can see that the Catholic author either purposefully cites an inaccurate translation or makes up his own.

@globalimpactministries766

7 жыл бұрын

Christ often spoke allegorically. He prayed in the Garden, saying, "Let this cup pass from me." Was Jesus praying that a literal cup would pass from him? Jesus said to his disciples, "Can you drink the cup I will drink, or be baptized with the baptism I will undergo (Mark 10:38)?" Jesus was clearly allegorically speaking of his approaching death. In like manner, Jesus was allegorically speaking about his flesh and blood being symbolized by the bread and fruit of the vine. This has to be the case, as no one would bring the bread and wine (after being blessed by a RC Priest) to a scientific laboratory and find that it actually turned into the body and blood of Jesus Christ!There is no reason to believe that Ignatius was speaking about the Lord's supper being literally transformed into the literal body and blood of Jesus Christ. Ignatius was also speaking allegorically in that the body of Christ receives the spiritual import of Christ's broken body and shed blood by examining themselves before partaking of the Lord's supper.

@johnb4632

7 жыл бұрын

Global Impact Ministries; In 1 Peter 2 4-5 you will see that following; Unto whom coming, as to a living stone, rejected indeed by men, but chosen and made honourable by God: 5Be you also as living stones built up, a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.

@johnb4632

7 жыл бұрын

Global Impact Ministries; Unless you eat my flesh; Christ said you will not enter the kingdom of God. You will not have life in you. Catholics believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. The substance does not change but being a mystery it is the body and blood of Christ. Bethlehem is called House of Bread. Jesus is the Lamb of God that has come to down from heaven. Protestants only treat communion as a symbol. Jesus said; Do this in memory of me. We need the Eucharist for nourishment for our souls. Like your body needs food for strength.

@globalimpactministries766

7 жыл бұрын

Your comments back up what we are saying. All of God's people are called as "kings and priests" (Revelation 1:6) rather than a few church leaders.

@globalimpactministries766

7 жыл бұрын

JOHN, I do not see how your comments demonstrate a meaningful response to my above post. Here is my post again: Christ often spoke allegorically. He prayed in the Garden, saying, "Let this cup pass from me." Was Jesus praying that a literal cup would pass from him? Jesus said to his disciples, "Can you drink the cup I will drink, or be baptized with the baptism I will undergo (Mark 10:38)?" Jesus was clearly allegorically speaking of his approaching death. In like manner, Jesus was allegorically speaking about his flesh and blood being symbolized by the bread and fruit of the vine. This has to be the case, as no one would bring the bread and wine (after being blessed by a RC Priest) to a scientific laboratory and find that it actually turned into the body and blood of Jesus Christ! The RC doctrine of "TRANSUBSTANTIATION" believes that the bread and the wine literally turn into the body and blood of Jesus. If this were the case then why have not devout Roman Catholics rushed to labs to test to see if the wine has turned into real blood and the bread into real human tissue? There is no reason to believe that Ignatius was speaking about the Lord's supper being literally transformed into the literal body and blood of Jesus Christ. Ignatius was also speaking allegorically in that the body of Christ receives the spiritual import of Christ's broken body and shed blood when we examine ourselves before partaking of the Lord's supper.

Is st Ignatius of Antioch a Catholic? Are all doctors of church 4 catholics who lived till 7 th century from middle East catholics?What about Non Catholic ORTHODOX christians in middle east with Syriac and greek tradition which is true tradition of early christians

@pap2-371

5 жыл бұрын

@Asaph Vaporeven when you read the early church fathers you do not find a pope or Peter in Rome. Most of the time they are trying to correct the church in Rome that keep turning in the wrong direction.

@pap2-371

5 жыл бұрын

@Asaph Vapor I agree with most of what you write but the first part about Peter being crucified in Rome. I believe the start of that and that Peter was ever in Rome was the gospel of Peter which is known to be a false gospel. And Peter not being catholic I would say it depends on how you use the term meaning universal, all including as it was meant or as the Roman Catholic which Peter never was. So catholics seem to think because the word catholic appears it is talking of the church in Rome but it is used for the whole church as I believe you know.

@pap2-371

5 жыл бұрын

@Asaph Vapor I believe we are saying the same thing I thought you were say Peter was killed in Rome that is why I said the idea of Peter being killed or even in Rome was started by a false gospel. Peace brother we are on the same page, no pope.

@str.77

5 жыл бұрын

All these, living before the split, are both Catholic and Orthodox as both the split between the churches is one of the Church falling apart into two parts, one east, one west, whereas Protestantism was a totally new doctrine.

He was not RCC

@wjm5972

4 жыл бұрын

Knox converted in 1917

@donhaddix3770

4 жыл бұрын

@@wjm5972 Ignatius was not RCC. RCC did not exist then.

@wjm5972

4 жыл бұрын

@@donhaddix3770 RCC is just a name the Anglicans gave Catholics . It was still the Catholic Church founded on the Apostles By Jesus with the Apostle Peter as the leader of the Apostles, The Rock(Kepha) upon which Jesus would build his Church.

@donhaddix3770

4 жыл бұрын

@@wjm5972 False.

The Catholicism is the post Meseahnic Judaism and Judaism was the pre Meseahnic Catholicism nothing more and nothing less

Apostasy was going on in the day of Paul

presbyter means elder

@CPATuttle

Жыл бұрын

Other way around.

So Catholic means not just universal ... but complete ... Halleluia ....

I keep wondering how evangelicals can believeve that God could allow christians to go astray for hundreds and hundreds of years due to false teachings of the catholic or the eastern orthododox church while believing that God wants the salvation of humankind.(Maybe they don't believe that really, considering the teachings of Calvin). It seems to me quite paradoxical. At least it makes questionable the love of God for humanity as a whole.

@etienner5659

Жыл бұрын

This is religion.

Reading of the New Testament will reveal that the Catholic Church does not have its origin in the teachings of Jesus or His apostles. In the New Testament, there is no mention of the papacy, worship/adoration of Mary (or the immaculate conception of Mary, the perpetual virginity of Mary, the assumption of Mary, or Mary as co-redemptrix and mediatrix), petitioning saints in heaven for their prayers, apostolic succession, the ordinances of the church functioning as sacraments, infant baptism, confession of sin to a priest, purgatory, indulgences, or the equal authority of church tradition and Scripture. We are not saved by sacraments; we are saved by faith. As one can see the origin of the Catholic Church is not in the teachings of Jesus and His apostles.

Catholism's problem isn't canonical tradition, it's institutional corruption. This is at least as true now as it was when Martin Luther made his first protest.

@RumorHazi

5 жыл бұрын

I'm with Pat. Taken another way, there have ALWAYS been failings of men from the very beginning. Let this not blind you to the virtue and beauty that there is in the Church and its many, many Saints. If Judas can look our Savior right in the eyes and betray him then, yeah, there will be the potential for some SERIOUS failings of "institutional corruption. Ask yourself how many of those corruptions are actually in the deposit of Faith taught by the Church. Is it the Church that failed the men or the men that failed the Church?

@pchuck1439

5 жыл бұрын

Not leaving Jesus because of Judas.

@curiously3755

5 жыл бұрын

@@pchuck1439 You don't have to leave Jesus because of Judas, or leave the Catholic Church because of Martin Luther - if I read you right, but shouldn't we acknowledge that a church is a collection of fallible human beings? How can we work towards something better unless we challenge what has happened in the past, in the very recent past?

@tobiasmontoya9780

4 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/oX-Bs8msabOWp8Y.html

@tj3kidos

3 жыл бұрын

🙄 as if the protestors (Protestants) are all angels And Saints. You might wanna take the LOG outta ur own eye before judging the splinter in mine

I must say watch yourself with this guy he is trying to say everyone was Roman Catholic. Like his talk of the Eucharist how Ignatius says one bread Ignatius says one loaf of bread, one cup. Most likely to say the same as Paul told the Corinthians don't bring a lot of food to the Lord's supper. There is no proof of priests back then even though this guy mixes up the words so there is priest where there are none. This fellow most likely starts with Ignatius because he is translated Catholic where he says universal church, which still is not the Roman Catholic Church. And as far as the Catholic church being the only one to know about the early church fathers there are non catholic writings from the 1800's. And as far as one church there was but it was not based in Rome and from what I get out of reading the early church fathers they wrote to correct each other when that church was doing some thing not right and the Church of Rome got a lot of letters. Check out Ken Johnson about early church fathers, he is not so Roman.

@pap2-371

5 жыл бұрын

@@wolfthequarrelsome504what are you saying?

@tobiasmontoya9780

4 жыл бұрын

It is a grave mistake for you to confuse Rome with the Catholic Church . Or to think that all the churches ( those in individual geographic places ) were not in agreement . It is only one church not many . And any heresy that the church had to contend with did not rise about because of the church itself but had sprung up from those who were not properly educated in the faith and that is why the litters were coming from those who hold authority in the Catholic Church . To put it plainly THE STUDENTS ARE NOT GREATER THAN THE MASTER . AND THOSE WHO WERE WITHOUT THE CHURCH COULD NOT SPEAK FOR THE CHURCH . As all heretics are in fact outside of the Catholic Church.

Its so interesting that a non-Catholic will call a Catholic Priest for an exorcism yet The Catholic Faith is all wrong...just makes no sense. Wouldn't you think that if a Catholic Priest is the only one youll call on that maybe the Catholic faith should be investigated further?

@38 heresy; @44 clergy; @52 eucharist; @1.05 to romans

Some Catholics read the bible and become Christians, being-born again and follow the teachings of Christ, word of God, not the Catholic church.

Very well done. Unfortunately,the mass rape of young children by priests,and the subsequent cover up by Church officials has caused real,deep,disenchantment with the Catholic Church,and the status of the clergy. The clergy that Ignatius so revered,is now in disgrace. It will take much bolder action of apology and repentance from the Pope on down the hierarchy,for the RCC to recover.

@Catholic1391

6 жыл бұрын

Neil Hasid, the FBI has pictures of peoples that molester childrens, out of 50 churches 49 was Protestant and only one Catholic, but then again the world hates the Catholic Church, as it hated Jesus.

@joecastillo8798

4 жыл бұрын

@Neil Hasid Neil, When you declare "mass rape of children" you reveal the stupor of the devil-inspired anti Catholic rhetoric in which you've willingly succumbed. Such pitiful state of your mind and conscience can be very harmful to your own salvation. May God give you the grace to know His one truth.

@jeffscully1347

2 жыл бұрын

Of course you probably aren't aware, but the problem of sexual abuse of minors is most prevalent in the home and involve family members (85%). The second most prevalent setting is public schools (11%). The last 4% involve ALL religious settings. And since 2002, the percentage involving the Catholic Church and priests is negligible. Today the problem is even greater in Protestant churches than it ever was in the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is a big target, with deep pockets. At it's lowest point it involved about 2% of all Catholic priests in the US. ONE incident is too many, but put it all into perspective, and you'll see the biggest problem is in the home, involving family members, then in public schools, and then in Protestant churches, and finally, the Catholic Church, with nearly zero reports in the last 20 years.

I would be very careful treading where you choose to tread. Society of Pius X does have grant their priests faculties - they after all have bishops who grant the SSPX priests these faculties. Eastern rite churches under the Bishop of Rome do operate in a similar manner. This is also true for the manner in which the Anglican Ordinate priests operate. Add the military chaplaincies. Please leave such questions to canon lawyers - as your opinion does not hold water for the reasons you provided.

@dlwatib

9 жыл бұрын

deusimperator A bishop can't grant faculties outside his own jurisdiction. SSPX is not a rite like the Eastern rites. It's a schismatic group and its bishops have no licit jurisdictions whatsoever. From wikipedia: "Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and President of the Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei", stated on 22 December 2013 that the leaders of the Society are in schism, having departed from communion with the Church, but that the door is open for them if they change their attitude and accept the Catholic Church's conditions and the Pope as the definitive criterion of membership."

@dlwatib

9 жыл бұрын

deusimperator A bishop can't grant faculties outside his own jurisdiction. SSPX is not a rite like the Eastern rites. It's a schismatic group and its bishops have no licit jurisdictions whatsoever. They are, at present, Protestants, not Catholics at all. From wikipedia: "Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and President of the Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei", stated on 22 December 2013 that the leaders of the Society are in schism, having departed from communion with the Church, but that the door is open for them if they change their attitude and accept the Catholic Church's conditions and the Pope as the definitive criterion of membership."

Informative video where it sticks to history and facts, but the immediate error is the implied claim that Catholic and Roman Catholic are the same thing. Catholic simply means universal - Roman Catholicism is a later development. Claiming 'ownership' of the early Catholic and Apostolic Church fathers by the Roman Catholic Church is an error at best, dishonest at worst.

Catholic is wrong in the eyes of Coptic churches. Why priest don't marry before being a priest. Is not good to be a married man while they are Decons.

This is deceiving. It is not the difference between the Christians & Catholics, but the difference between Catholic Christians and the ROMAN Catholics. There you will see the difference. There is also a difference between the early Christians and the church FATHERS (Matthew 23:9). They are the same people of the 1st century. Search who among them venerate any image's. There you will know the difference between the Roman Catholic against a Christian Catholic. The speaker does not mention the Roman imposed tradition to Roman catholic church.

3pm is The hour of Mercy- 3am is the evil hour . Just sayin lol

THE reason we don’t listen to anyone after the apostles Apostasy from day one

You said it! Rome is the city on 7 hills. John of Patmos: And I stood upon the of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having 7 heads and 10 horns, and his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him power, and his seat, and great authority. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. Me: the head with a deadly wound represents when Rome fell in the 1700’s. But it’s now just an ugly scar to Christians, and we’re waiting for the day that Jesus will destroy the entire beast. Oh, and you can stop knocking down other beliefs, because they don’t start inquisitions and murder millions or put anathemas on people who reject their religion.

@CPATuttle

Жыл бұрын

So dumb.

@lifestylemedicinals8692

9 ай бұрын

There are also 7 hills in the United States too 👀 And the woman who sits upon many waters, symbolized by the statue of liberty, is the whore of Babylon that all the nations of the world are trading with. The 7 heads of the dragon are attributed to different kingdoms: Babylon>Egypt>Assyria>Medes>Macedonia>Rome>America America is Mystery Babylon, the land that John couldn't recognize. Now that the 7th head of the beast has fulfilled it's role, the beast will pass it's authority down to the second beast. This will be america forfeiting it's supremacy and giving it to the One world leader, who speaks like a dragon and looks like a lamb. I believe the same principality that took over the original Catholic church and became an institution is what migrated to the United States. But all the nations of the world that are the 7 heads of the dragon will be promoting the new beast and working alongside him to usher in the new religion, government, currency, etc..

You have missed the whole point ,churches change membership .Of course the Roman church changed . The only truth is found in the Bible as this only is God's inspired word brought by those he commissioned . You cannot use the so called Apostolic fathers any more than the Arians or Gnostics .To begin with they do not even agree with each other. The important point is do they preach the gospel ,if not they are not Christian .As Paul said Gal .1:8 though WE or an Angel from heaven preach any other gospel unto you than THAT WHICH WE HAVE PREACHED UNTO YOU ,LET HIM BE ACCURSED . That means you do not change the way of salvation . Iranaeus said 'the altar then is in heaven (for towards that place are our prayers and oblations directed also. Said of some- 'and IMAGINING that it was actually flesh and blood.)

It's ironic that , this whole lecture is based on the historicity of the Christian teachings , but fails to mentioned that the Catholic Church goes back to the apostolic times , when it's actually the Eastern Orthodox Church Greek Orthodox , and the west left the east in 1054 , and since the schism the Catholic Church lost the grace, if you want proof explain to me , why Catholics put salt in the holy water and orthodox Catholic water does t water doesn't go off

@aluminium4me

7 жыл бұрын

Catholic means universal

@mikeryan3701

7 жыл бұрын

"the west left the east in 1054.' Just exactly how is 'the west' supposed to have left 'the east'?

@dbtez1212

6 жыл бұрын

Tas Markou Tell me where is Peter’s tomb ?

@pap2-371

5 жыл бұрын

@@dbtez1212 no one really knows

@str.77

5 жыл бұрын

Nothing of great, enduring substance happened in 1054 (a all-too-quick legate of a dead pope excommunicated a heavy-handed patriarch). The split was a gradual process that started way before that year and was finalized only later. However, it is totally silly that the "west left the east"! How could it? Did Italy or Western Europe suddenly move? And the dispute were really mostly over minute points and about a lot of uniwiligness to understand the other side. Your exasperation about "salt in holy water" (what exactly you mean by " water does t water doesn't go off") clearly shows that. Since the talk was given in Texas, which definitely is in the West, the Eastern Orthodox Church should not actually have a bone to pick with the speaker being Catholic, unless you really have something to complain about IN the talk. Do you?

In Matthew 7, Jesus warns us of false prophets, wolves in sheep's clothing. We can tell them by their fruit. If what they say matches scripture, good. But if they go against scripture, beware. Jesus also said that not everyone who calls Him Lord will enter the Kingdom of Heaven, but only those who do the will of His Father in Heaven. Jesus did not sin (disobey the law) because He always followed the will of the Father. Paul says that in his time, false prophets had already entered the church. Forty years later it is almost certain that some leaders would be false prophets. We just have to use scripture to identify them. Who should we follow, the Word of God, or the words of a possible false prophet? What he wrote may be what he practiced, but that doesn't necessarily make it right. We need to go to scripture to verify.

@joecastillo8798

4 жыл бұрын

@Super Bug Jesus said to follow His Church. He NEVER SAID go read your Bible, figure it out and invent your own sect There's no other Apostolic authority outside the Catholic Church. The Church came first, not the Bible: Early Christians were not devoted to reading the Bible, rather: ACTS 2:41-42 41 So those who welcomed his message were baptized, and that day about three thousand persons were added. 42 They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. Remember! ONE GOD >>> ONE CHURCH

@user-uu2rf8ev7z

4 жыл бұрын

@@joecastillo8798 WRONG. The scriptures contained in what we refer to as the old testament were written long before the Catholic Church was formed. You are a despicable liar. The Catholic church had nothing to do with writing them. In Acts 17, Paul and Silas went to Berea and preached the word. The people were eager to hear the word, but being cautious, searched the scriptures daily to see for themselves that what they heard was true. If they could verify, by reading the old testament, that Paul was speaking the truth, then we should be able to do the same. Acts 17:11 "for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so." So who should we follow? Ask Peter. Acts 5:29 "But Peter and the apostles answered, "We must obey God rather than men." Did all men receive the Holy Spirit? No, only those who who obey God. Acts 5:32 "and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him." As the Catholic church has discarded most of the laws in scripture, it is obvious that it does not obey God and therefore cannot have the Holy Spirit. If the writings of an early church leader contradict scripture contained in the old testament, then he is a false prophet and we should obey God instead. Who are you to tell me that I am not allowed to read scripture? That is something Satan the devil would do to hide the truth.

@user-uu2rf8ev7z

4 жыл бұрын

@@joecastillo8798 are you telling me to obey the Pope, a man who had he done his job properly, would have spoken the truth and told people to not eat blood or unclean animals, and we would not have this pandemic today. He is a liar and has the blood of over 100,000 people on his hands.

@joecastillo8798

4 жыл бұрын

@@user-uu2rf8ev7z Have you ever heard of the "New Covenant in His blood"? The Old Testament is no longer the rule. ●LUKE 22:19-20 19. And he took bread, GAVE THANKS and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, “THIS IS MY BODY given for you; DO THIS IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME.” 20. In the same way, after the supper he TOOK the CUP, saying, “This cup IS the NEW COVENANT in MY BLOOD, which is poured out for you. ●JESUS MEANT IT LITERALLY! REMEMBER HIS WORDS:! ●JOHN 6, 53-56 53 Jesus replied to them: In all truth I tell you, IF YOU DO NOT EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN and DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU HAVE NO LIFE IN YOU. 54 Anyone who DOES EAT MY FLESH AND DRINK MY BLOOD HAS ETERNAL LIFE, and I shall raise that person up on the last day. 55 For MY FLESH is REAL FOOD and MY BLOOD is REAL DRINK. 56 WHOEVER EATS MY FLESH and DRINKS MY BLOOD lives in me and I live in that person. So, you must do as God says. Good day!

@joecastillo8798

4 жыл бұрын

@@user-uu2rf8ev7z I ask you: Do you believe that what you think becomes THE WILL OF GOD just because you wish or "interpret" in your own peculiar way? ABSOLUTELY NOT! JESUS GAVE HIS AUTHORITY TO ONE CHURCH ONLY! ●MATTHEW 16:18-19 18. And I tell YOU, YOU are PETER, and on THIS ROCK I will BUILD MY CHURCH, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it. . 19. I will GIVE YOU the KEYS of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you BIND on earth shall be BOUND in HEAVEN, and whatever you LOOSE on earth shall be LOOSED in HEAVEN.” MATTHEW 18:17 17. If he refuses to listen to them, tell the church. If he refuses to listen even to the church, then treat him as you would a Gentile or a tax collector. 18. Amen, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. JESUS MESSAGE WILL BE SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE WORLD IN UNITY, UNDER ONE AUTHORITY: MATTHEW 28:19-20 19. Therefore go and make disciples of ALL NATIONS, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20. and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I AM WITH YOU ALWAYS, to the very end of the age.” JESUS HIMSELF SPEAKS THROUGH HIS ONE AND ONLY CHURCH: LUKE 10:16 16. 'Anyone who listens to you listens to me; anyone who rejects you rejects me, and those who reject me reject the one who sent me.' JOHN 16: 12-15 12. “I HAVE yet MANY THINGS TO SAY TO YOU, but you cannot bear them now. 13. When the SPIRIT of TRUTH comes, he WILL GUIDE YOU INTO ALL THE TRUTH; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come. 14. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you. 15. All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that HE WILL TAKE WHAT IS MINE and DECLARE IT TO YOU. ONLY ONE CHURCH WITH ONE TRUTH: JOHN 17: 18-23 18. As you sent me into the world, so I sent them into the world. 19. And I consecrate myself for them, so that they also may be CONSECRATED IN TRUTH. 20. “I pray not only for them, but also for those who will believe in me through their word, 21. so that they may ALL BE ONE, as you, Father, are in me and I in you, that they also may BE IN US, that the world may believe that you sent me. 22. And I have given them the glory you gave me, so that THEY MAY BE ONE, as we are one, 23. I in them and you in me, that they may be brought to perfection AS ONE, that the world may know that you sent me, and that you loved them even as you loved me. This ONE and ONLY Church gathered at the Council of Rome, in 382 AD, organized by Pope Damasus 1st. to decide on which books were to be considered Inspired and which were not, out of an approximate number of 250 new Christian era books, to be added to the Septuagint or Greek Old Testament mostly used by Jesus and His Apostles. It was then, through his "DECREE OF DAMASUS", that The Pope decreed on the official list of inspired books which we now call NEW TESTAMENT, to be united to the well known Septuagint into ONE single BOOK called THE BIBLE. It was UNITY and legitimate AUTHORITY that brought forth The Bible. "SOLA SCRIPTURA" CAN NEVER BE TRUE 1 TIMOTHY 3:15 15 if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is THE CHURCH of the living God, THE PILLAR and FOUNDATION of the TRUTH. God bless.

The Pope rich af. You think Jesus was rich af? You betta get right. Ignatius was called The Devil's son. What books you been reading? Not a lot of evidence here.

This man presupposes a lot! Relying on your own churchs tradition as a foundation for why you church is authentic is disingenuous at best. I made it 20 min into the video before I realized it's just catholic propaganda. I'll give him credit for acknowledging his bias in the introduction, not that your wouldn't quickly figure it out within the first 5 minutes anyways.

@CPATuttle

Жыл бұрын

Do you presuppose? Because when I look up the history Catholics preach. And then what Protestants preach. Catholic Church aligns with all the historical sources. It’s like Protestants circle mythical history amongst themselves

This speaker is purposefully deceptive and that is truly disappointing. The Catholic Church had placed the Pope's edicts above Scripture. The Catholic Church kept the common man ignorant of the Scriptures and killed anyone who did know the Scriptures and spoke out against the Pope's abuse of his position. This speaker continually doesn't present the actual truth. It's a shame and the main reason true believers aren't Catholic.