War thunder fans know how good this is

@hatzsexymama5916

3 жыл бұрын

hell yea.. most of staff from here

@TheKaMeLRo

3 жыл бұрын

yep, just shoot 2 tanks behind the tree line and smoke that easily. kzread.info/dash/bejne/e6eso9dygtPdn7g.html

@Tiny578

3 жыл бұрын

@@bibekjung7404 Jesus is Lord, don't complicate matters.

@egonieser

3 жыл бұрын

Yup, the thing is a menace. I generally don't like missile carriers in the game, but this one is actually enjoyable to play.

@yzyz7779

3 жыл бұрын

👍👍

WOW what powerful penetrating weapons Russian production 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

@eouzcuemarz3114

3 жыл бұрын

It can even sink the battle ship Bismark 😁

@polygamous1

3 жыл бұрын

@@eouzcuemarz3114 or the Ragan carrier with a big salvo, for now no nuclear war on earth thank you mother Russia

Very cool episode. That system is terrifying.

The combat vehicle's rate of fire is up to 4 missiles/minute. The rockets are launched from the spot, sequentially. With one combat vehicle, it is possible to simultaneously hover two missiles at two targets.

17:22 Alexey: Kilometrov? Subtitles: Miles? Valery: Yes. Kilometrov v sekundu! Subtitles: Yes, miles per second! :)

@trololoev

2 жыл бұрын

both is true, it deals couple of miles or couple of kilometres per second

Abrams crew goes: Blyat...

@thestranger6554

3 жыл бұрын

👍

@FastPaull

2 жыл бұрын

Have you ever heard of ERA?

@StarFyodperor

2 жыл бұрын

@@FastPaull Yea... APS also... it is kinda mouse chase...

@abbabubba

2 жыл бұрын

@@FastPaull Tandem charge negates ERA

@Mr_Roomba_

Жыл бұрын

@@abbabubba what about 2 layers of ERA

Great Video , Greetings from Macedonia 🇲🇰 ❤ All The Best !

@mdjd.8893

3 жыл бұрын

North Macedonia***. Blame your government

Khrizantema is probably named after flower Chrysanthemum, the flower it self is rounded and of yellow color, that yellow radar dish on top of the vehicle is possible inspiration for the name.

@worldoftancraft

3 жыл бұрын

You wrote the same word twice, but, in different languages. Congratulations, Sherlock. P.s. don't take this as an offence. Why can't I mock a mister Foreigner a little?:)

@721MrG

3 жыл бұрын

@@worldoftancraft No offence taken. I'm impressed by the level of detective work and effott you put on the random YT comment.

Khrizantema is such an awesome system, it reminds me of the RaketenJagdPanzer but just in a more modern Version, very cool ! I would hate to see such thing on the Battlefield against me.

your channel is the best Military Channel.

Great job, u guys have

1.2m of RHA penetration is impressive!

ধন্যবাদ... thanks

Awesome weapons love it 💯

A reporter climbing inside the work area of a horizontal machining centre while it is running is a first it would have been funnier if the coolant was on.

Jes, the commentators voice is a ball burster. Good doc on Rus weapons, would be better without a voiceover from someone who sounds like they are dying of throat cancer.

@mikeykeyes

3 жыл бұрын

who is it? A real American or a very well trained in American accent Russian?

@mrrolandlawrence

3 жыл бұрын

i did wonder if he had a stomer.

@duuke4618

3 жыл бұрын

Agreed

@trevorphillips4595

3 жыл бұрын

He's dying from a huge constipation, trying to squeeze the mole out ;-)

@nagantm441

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikeykeyes it's s Russian. Just listen to how he pronounces the name of the missile.

friend once told me you only disclose tech after significant multiple upgrades have occurred .

Awesome

That voice ... anyway i am glad that this is in english now, cause i do not understand enough russian for the original.. :-)

In fact, in reality, this missile penetrates any modern tank head-on - through and through.

@jesseterrell9354

3 жыл бұрын

It’s a good system but abrams frontal turret armor is rated at 1,300mm against heat and this says it will only go through 4 feet that’s 1,200mm

@TheNicestPig

2 жыл бұрын

@@jesseterrell9354 Chobham degrades, so a second hit would do the job.

@jesseterrell9354

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheNicestPig until APS is mounted

@TheNicestPig

2 жыл бұрын

@@jesseterrell9354 Yeah, APS is cool.

@DavidC1

2 жыл бұрын

@@jesseterrell9354 thats why use HE missle, overpressure the tank

RIP ..Abrams tank 😭

@abbabubba

2 жыл бұрын

Abrams?lol.It can even penetrate battleship armor with ease

Poderoso Crisantemo 👍💪 Powerful K...

Is it tandem charged which penetrates 1200mm armor?

can you have the english version keep the figures in metric please? its only the usa and burma that sill use feet and inches.

@jjgloria1972

2 жыл бұрын

umm we use both standard and metric we don't have a problem figuring that out

@Hellohallo

2 жыл бұрын

@@jjgloria1972 why use inches at all in educational videos..

Hebat 👍👍🇲🇾

Keepitup

Well, every factory producing precise stuff should have a room with about 20°C. Even the little company I work for has such a room for measuring

☺️🇷🇺🤝🇮🇳💐

Please give some cough syrup to the commentator

@BoBo-nv9qu

3 жыл бұрын

Damn true!! OMG, so fucking hillarious, lmaooo!! Hahaha

@abbabubba

2 жыл бұрын

Tbh Russian programs are cool because of it

Love from India 🇮🇳

KHRIZANTEMA, TUNGUSKA, KORNET,,, 💪💪

Can I shot on the move, can it acquire a target if such target is moving and more likely firing at it ? 🤔

A small thing at 22:30 on, it's probably only in the translation? That machine is not a lathe! If it WAS, what a lathe does is called "Turning" in English. What we see is "Milling". Also getting inside the work envelope while the machine is going is very unusual, OK for television, forbidden and ideally impossible in practice. Normally the machine won't cut when all those doors are open. I'm a shop teacher! So, limited perspective here. Having a great time as always watching this.

@Alex_Gryzunov

Жыл бұрын

Журналист назвал станок - обрабатывающий центр.

How this missile stand up to spike or helina missile

Forgive me if I'm wrong but isn't the Kornet-EM more powerful than the Khrisantema?

@user-qz2sw7pq8y

3 жыл бұрын

in terms of pure pen power jeah it is but this one is faster for example one can imagine bouth missiles being kinda their own thing. bouth are being modernized. russia buys right now not only this tank destroyer but Kornet D on Gaz Tigr base too

@user-uq8yy1mp3d

3 жыл бұрын

The chrysanthemum is guided by the radar and flies at a distance of 10 km, against the optical Cornet 5 km.

@LeadFollower551

3 жыл бұрын

basically same penetration, but Khrizantema's missle is faster and can hit things in 0 visibility

@ser43_OLDC

3 жыл бұрын

The Krizantema can be guide by laser, at a range of 8km and by radar at 10km. Also is faster Kornet same pen but is cheaper and smaller. Krizantema is base for helis mi28nm and tank's destroyers bmp3 Krizantema launcher

@divinesan7786

3 жыл бұрын

For me they are as strong as each other

When Abrams X its suppose to be deployed?

This shit fucking lit in War Thunder. Be clapping Abrams' cheeks both figuratively and literally.

@jesseterrell9354

3 жыл бұрын

From what I understand the newest abrams has armor that can stand 1300 mm of penetration from a heat warhead so they say this will pen 4 feet that’s only 1200mm no pen at least in the frontal turret.

@TheNicestPig

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesseterrell9354 true dat. Abrams has top class turret cheeks CE protection. The poor hull on the otherhand...

@jesseterrell9354

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheNicestPig weaponized math is what it boils down to once you know how much armor you have to get through it’s just a numbers game

@TheNicestPig

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesseterrell9354 That's why they keep the numbers sekrit in the first place

@jesseterrell9354

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheNicestPig no such thing these days especially with US arms sector all that info is stolen with ease.

I've missed classical russians beeing ecofriendly, if your smoke grenades don't work just burn tyres... Ps: still better than Chernobyl

It would be able to destroy the T-14 - because that missile is a tandem warhead weapon. They're designed to go through ERA.

..👍

Please, all that smoke, little greta is choking.

@32:13 is it me or the cube is actually hollow. He is showing metal cube, but it looks like a sheet metal on a frame. Can anyone confirm/deny, maybe I'm lacking some cognitive abilities about those things. Maybe this "cube" is just to show how a real one full metal is looking like, it would be about 10 t heavy and hard to move around for filming, so they are using this one as "placeholder".

@aventusgroup8696

3 жыл бұрын

yes its a hollow cube to give the viewers an idea what 4 foot of steel looks like. the real steel they shot at is at the end of the video. the cube was just a prop

Glass Canon.

the narrator tried to remind people they have a better chance of surviving cancer than surviving the khrizantema

This tech could be nice for satellites with cm radar, undersea mapping, or SAR efforts. Not only for destruction.

@TheNicestPig

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah scale it up, slap it onto a rocket and launch it to space

@yelectric1893

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheNicestPig hell yeah vro. Who knows? It’s eyes without eyes!

Also the measuring device is called "Coordinate-measuring machine" British invention

This is more intended for the us government n their military, Don't mess with us cause we may lose passion, but the us military Knows what they may have to face if they keep pushing their lack this n many other Russian weapons its what kept Venezuela Iran n N Korea from been destroyed, thank You mother Russia n the greatest president on earth of all times You bring us all peace on earth

What will happen if a tank has cage armour which decreases the effect of tandem warhead?

@DinoPal

3 жыл бұрын

cage is useless, watch episode 46

@abbabubba

2 жыл бұрын

No effect.They could withstand RPG,mediocre simple rockets, HE and Artillery rounds.But not ATGM's

@chandima339

Жыл бұрын

36:05 the answer ..

@trout1187

Жыл бұрын

Why don't you try warhead fu.k head see what happens. This is not Iraq try it but you really have to have the BALLS

the former version of this vehicle shturm s saw use in Nagarno-Karabagh conflict by Armenians. From what i have seen just infantry with a kornet launcher would be far more effective against tanks because its much harder to detect.

@TheNicestPig

2 жыл бұрын

Infantry can't carry 16 ATGMs and have a radar that can see in 0 visibility condition, or thermal sights.

@localdrugseller6431

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheNicestPig Infantry is much harder to detect and fight against. shturm is giant and much easier to detect with thermal sights compared to infantry on range.

@TheNicestPig

2 жыл бұрын

@@localdrugseller6431 yeah but infantry can't carry 16 of those, run 60kph or carry a radar.

@TheNicestPig

2 жыл бұрын

@Diz Zkl true, if i'm in an urban situation i'd take the RPG-29/Kornet dudes any time over a large carrier vehicle, but if i'm going to engage enemy tanks over extreme distances in poor naked eye visibility i'd want a Khrizantema just second to friendly MBTs

If Khrizantema were to shoot 9M123 Tandem HEAT missile, it woud DEFINETLY penetrate T-14 armada or any other current tank on any nation.

@Nicolas10391

10 ай бұрын

From the sides yes,from the front no

Chieftain crew.......Whatever Boris sheesh

United Kingdom: We will send depleted uranium tank rounds *Russian military laughing in Khrizantema*

Great documentary ! Why not use the metric system when it comes to measurements?

@nagantm441

3 жыл бұрын

They do

@babattaja

3 жыл бұрын

American translated..

@34:21 what word is that in english? thank you.

@MEDVEDrus76

3 жыл бұрын

Пуск=start=launch

@triblues7065

3 жыл бұрын

@@MEDVEDrus76 thank you.

@MM-lm3or

3 жыл бұрын

@@triblues7065 Pronounced Pusk = Пуск

@triblues7065

3 жыл бұрын

@@MM-lm3or Thank you.

I need about 10 Simonov Rifles to fight the CJNG in Mexico, can I have them? Please.

At 16:40 I don’t think Khrizantema can do top-down attack?

@nguyenhieu6731

Жыл бұрын

Maybe. Khrizantema - s in VietNam can do top-down attack

@UkrainianSun

Жыл бұрын

😑

take a shot everytime the say KHRIZANTEMA

Wait isnt the khrizantema just using gen 3 thermals to see through the non chaf smoke? That means all mbts can do that or any that have gen 2-3 thermals can see through non chaf smoke

@babattaja

3 жыл бұрын

I quess it can use both, but i'm sure it uses Radar to lock onto target.

4ft = 1.2 meters thick of steel armor.

@ser43_OLDC

3 жыл бұрын

1200mm of pen (tandem)

@Daniel-jg8ff

3 жыл бұрын

Actually 1250mm

God grant Victory to the Russian Federation, and all of the member countries of "BRICS." 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺⭐🇷🇺🇷🇺Z🇷🇺🇷🇺⭐🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

kinda sus that inches are used. Nation media directed towards another of this quality and funding may be trying to convince its citizens. What the hell?

POWERFUL KHRIZANTEMA, ANOTHER DESTROYS TANKS,

in d major...

Has this weapon been fielded in Ukraine? Why isnt it designed to be carried by one soldier like the Javelin?

бензо-колонка рулит...)

hello..

Reminds me of the ADAT system from the 1980's. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Defense_Anti-Tank_System. That could penetrate 900mm of RHA. Of course modern tanks use multilayered armour with tungsten, ceramics , DU etc plus explosive reactive armour and the latest, a self defence system that can take down the round before it strikes the tank such as the Israeli Trophy system.

@greatdude7279

3 жыл бұрын

"That could penetrate 900mm of RHA. Of course modern tanks use multilayered armour with tungsten, ceramics , DU etc plus explosive reactive armour and the latest" Tandem missiles? latest, a self defence system that can take down the round before it strikes the tank such as the Israeli Trophy system. Russians have already developed a way around APS using decoy's which makes APS targets decoys instead of the actual missile. As far as I know Russians are one of the few countries that really got into APS besides Israel they had Arena, Virss and other hard kill/soft kill APS. I know T-80s variants such as T-80UM and t-90's had APS already in the 90's.

Will they be in action against the German Leopard in Ukraine ?

Врагови её не вижу, только чуствую!🤣

бедный стакан с чаем..

did i heard Libya ? was not it Syria?

@wekker090

3 жыл бұрын

No it was Libya. there is many parties fucking about there.

@chandima339

3 жыл бұрын

USA rus support Lna. they are in same side in Libya

@maheshpadeniya

3 жыл бұрын

@@wekker090 you mean Khrizantema is tested in Libya?

It's nice how they show western TOW missile vs their own tank in 16:33. Idiots then same as now.

Nice how they say, that they are so far ahead in usage of Milimeter Radar in Missiles... the USA have the AGM-114L (together with the Apache Longbow) in use since 1995. the Chrysantema was released in 1996. Dont get me wrong, the Chrysantema is an exceptional Missile, but they get many things wrong in this video.

@nagantm441

3 жыл бұрын

No other land platform does it. Maybe soon with the MMW hellfire, but still nothing else

@jjgloria1972

2 жыл бұрын

chrysanthemums are propaganda lol

Dude. APC is not BMP. Check what means IFV or something.

@ser43_OLDC

3 жыл бұрын

Is a bmp3 Krizantema

Guys pls translate feet to metric too. Watching from eu, don't know how long is 4 feet 1:52 or 8:57 2.3 inches

@yfelwulf

3 жыл бұрын

1 inch = 2.54 cm 1 foot = 30.5 cm 1 meter = 39.37 inches 1 kg = 2.2 pounds 4 feet quick = 120 cm 1.2 m 2.3 inches quick = 64 mm Feet are indicated by ' as shorthand 1' inches by " so 1 foot 4 inches is 1'4"

Nice name . I've always liked Chrysanthemums . Wow it can see a minivan through a smokescreen . The very fact that there is a smoke screen means you put a couple of FIN rounds through it ! Its a lot quicker than deploying than this thing and a lot cheaper ! Anything that can handle 15" or 19" has a career in porn movies .

@jjgloria1972

2 жыл бұрын

lol classic

The guidance on this missile is so damn odd. Great, but odd. Not a bad thing, but using a radar to paint or search ground targets from the ground must have taken crazy math or something . Maybe bushes are invisible, steel and ceramic plates stand out. Hmmmm

@yelectric1893

2 жыл бұрын

@Diz Zkl Please explain. I am no defense analyst or even an engineer. I thought it was a sort of radar imager , no? Instead of colors, its depth to make a 3D model of the world. Plus it can tell relative speeds of objects in that model. Surface features, materials, can be determined by radio science maybe?

Why this voice of narrator

Impressive weapon system. But the english narrator sounds constipated.

Why do you have to pollute so much?

when Khrizantema will meet Leopard and M1A2 in Ukraine

@frankiecalsone8536

Жыл бұрын

🚀🔥

Crisanthema,, is kornet,,

@joanlouray6284

3 жыл бұрын

@Thomas Vavrusco That's right, I mean the kornet for me is much more effective,

@joanlouray6284

3 жыл бұрын

Kornet penetrates 1300mm, well okhurra crisanthema and kornet.

@joanlouray6284

3 жыл бұрын

@Thomas Vavrusco Ok greetings

Why is anyone still building tank destroyers in this day an age?

@vasopel

3 жыл бұрын

hm...because there are still tanks to be destroyed?

@alexeyvlasenko6622

3 жыл бұрын

To destroy tanks, of course. Sure, you can launch the same missile from a helicopter or airplane, but a ground-based system still fills an important role. It is cheaper, less conspicuous, uses less fuel, has unlimited loiter time, and can work more closely with ground troops.

@haschkeo

3 жыл бұрын

​@@alexeyvlasenko6622 The 9M123 Khrizantema-VM is an air to surface version for helicopters. It was introduced in 2018.

I feel like that was just a welded cube of steel plates lol I mean im sure it goes through a ton of armor but Im fairly sure you can see the welds.... Also, just about every major military utilizes reactive armor now days..

@Lomnjac007

Жыл бұрын

Which is crap against tandem warheads...

wtf happened to narrators voice.

@nagantm441

3 жыл бұрын

Cigs

действие

Love u russia from Pakistan

lmao why do they keep showing a tow2b

Russia can produce a quality weapon. Now if they can provide their citizens with some freedom of speech, that would be great 😀

Бля только русские могут назвать смертельное оружие,красивым названием цветков

Love the way Russia gives the locations of all their facilities. In WW2 Germany had such a big problem with plants being identified and destroyed they used ID codes on later weapons to hide them.

@MA-nx3xj

3 жыл бұрын

Why bother today...totally pointless. There are still secret facilities (as in, what goes inside) but hiding their location really isn't feasible. No spy satellites, GPS and advanced recon means in WW2

@shtefjunja5915

3 жыл бұрын

everybody know everything about everybody.Russian knows everything about Americans planes,misiles,radars,subs,who and where make them ,how much cost,which type of coffie and icecream American workers use inLockid,toilet paper etc.same aplies for Americans,Izraely,Brits.not to mention what Miguel pointed.satelites see everything.

@sashaoledech4072

3 жыл бұрын

All strategic objects are protected by an echeloned defense system. The yoohead simply does not reach there, it will be destroyed on approach.

@yfelwulf

3 жыл бұрын

@@sashaoledech4072 No need to advertise where they are.

@stefantaubert

3 жыл бұрын

The locations at which weapon systems are produced are known anyway - at least the militarily relevant systems. Now one can ask why certain properties of these weapon systems are made known in the first place. And that question is easy to answer. Weapons are used not only for deployment, but also for deterrence. But how can you intimidate someone with a weapon system that knows nothing about its effectiveness and efficiency? So enough information is published so that everyone can see what and why not to mess with.

kilometers per second? yes, kilometers per second translator: miles per secont?yes, miles per second

@ruriderscom

3 жыл бұрын

10-11 km/sec - 6-7miles/sec norm 17:33

@16:35 that's an American Tow missile hiting the tank guys...Report accurately🚦and No.. Armata might not defend itself against Tow or javelin because they hit the target with multiple warheads sitting on the same rocket...and or from awkward angles like the top or weaker sides.

@frankiecalsone8536

2 жыл бұрын

this is not an American missile hahah no need to lie

@thatOOM9

Жыл бұрын

@@frankiecalsone8536 that footage is of a TOW 2B not a Russian missile. So far Russia has not demonstrated a top attack missile capability.

@frankiecalsone8536

Жыл бұрын

@@thatOOM9 yes, of course, Soyuz engines and hypersonic missiles will now die with laughter

that's an expensive toy... maintenance+ crew training + fuel + logistic just to carry 2 rockets . my opinion, please correct me if I'm wrong

@dominicgregorio9913

3 жыл бұрын

@Константин Щербаков 🆒👍 but still expensive to run . but the concept is brilliant , I like it 😉

@GreenMorkovka

3 жыл бұрын

Man, modern tank is much more expensive. Thats the point of AT weapons\systens: weapon is cheaper than target

@dominicgregorio9913

3 жыл бұрын

@@GreenMorkovka true...it makes sense at one point as much as it doesn't make sense at all to have such a machinery carrying only 2 rockets ( somebody told me it could carry 15 ) , cheaper would be a javelin , mistral , konkurs etc etc.. lol my opinion

@nagantm441

3 жыл бұрын

@@dominicgregorio9913 it doesn't carry 2. It has an internal magazine and reloads the launcher.

@dominicgregorio9913

3 жыл бұрын

@@nagantm441 in this case it makes sense 😉 it could be used in sustainability of motorized infantry , my opinion

1200mm penetration lôl

For those that think that this stuff is somehow special or better than the Europeans or Americans have I present the frame from 20:21. The H logo on the CNC spindle is of the AMERICAN company Hass that makes all kinds of CNC equipment. So if the Russians are making their weapons with American machines, I’m sure the Americans can make just as good weapons or better. Hass isn’t even the top of the line as far as CNC equipment goes, European companies make much better and accurate machines.

what is the point? After CATSA its getting difficult to sell Russian Military hardware and Russian military sales have fallen significantly in the last year.

@pashapasovski5860

3 жыл бұрын

What are you talking about, Russia is second in the World in weapons sales

They claim they're AFV is the only vehicle that can see through smoke??!! So wrong! Most of the newer armored vehicles made in the last 20 years have some form infrared, Night vision, or electro optical sighting systems. The higher end vehicles usually have combination of multiple systems that have no problem seeing through smoke, or weather. Theres also rumors that some upcoming NATO programs for the scout vehicles and main battle tanks have ground optimized synthetic Aperture Radar. Wich uses signals from rader and other sensors to render an image amazingly high resolution picture. They've been integrating the system into fighter jet radars as early as the 80s and 90s. Nato countries like Germany , France ,and the US, even Turkey, have been using these systems for decades now.

@kloschuessel773

3 жыл бұрын

This seems like it can see through heat tho Radar... Thats how i understood this.

@dogetothemoon223

3 жыл бұрын

This vehicle was designed in 1996 and came out in 2005 so when they say "15 years ahead" I think they mean at that point. It does use radar to detect targets, not just thermals.

@SlavicSpring

3 жыл бұрын

I was reacting earlier to some of the hyperbolic statements from this show. But, I do believe that they talk about the issue with heat disturbance against heat signature seekers. Night vision would also be affected negatively. Now, if an old soviet radar and huge, cumbersome seeker head put on a lightly armored vehicle are "15 years ahead" is still debatable. The undebatable thing is the missile itself. For its generation, guidance and size...it's very impressive. Still, the lack of missiles comparable with AGM-114 Hellfire in Russian armed forces prompted the development of just such missiles. The 25-year-old tech of 9M123 Khrizantema will remain in service until the new missile is developed, tested and mass-produced. Even then, it's hard to think that Khrizantema will suddenly disappear. So, this is a rather interesting show to watch.

@salmanzafar86

3 жыл бұрын

i also found the 15 years ahead of nato claims hard to believe despite that this show is still good high quality viewing

@EcchiRevenge

3 жыл бұрын

Which active nato land vehicle uses radar for both spotting and shooting?

1200mm of penetration if my math is correct? Abrams has protection of 1300mm against heat at least on the turret

@UzzeRR

3 жыл бұрын

It's goes thru 1200mm and don't stops. IMHO, looking at outcoming blast and hole size it's have enough energy for extra 101mm atleast xD

@jesseterrell9354

3 жыл бұрын

@@UzzeRR maybe it’s a constant game of protection vs projectile. Plus active protection systems (APS) are being installed to defeat incoming projectiles and then something else will defeat those it’s just a nonstop game.

Шта ће ти енглески,причај Руски.