The Serbs later apologize for downing the murican pride with a system half century old: "sorry, we didn't know was a stealth plane ! "

@garwhittaker3743

3 жыл бұрын

Did he apologise to his people for the hundreds of strikes on different targets before it was shot down ?

@shakiajones8186

3 жыл бұрын

@@garwhittaker3743 Russians are obviously very insecure about the capabilities of their military. Or really the lack there of. They've been playing catch up since the collapse of the Soviet Union. The best they are capable of right now is achieving the U.S. status quo from 20 years back. The U.S. (and essentially all of NATO) are decades ahead in technology alone. The Russians and Chinese are trying desperately to compete. Even to the point of trying to parody technological capabilities by using off the shelf (consumer grade) parts. We have to remember that 5th generation fighter jets have been in development since the 1980's. Stealth technology since the late 1950's. Bottom line: The United States is the worlds premier fighting force. The gap is more than a couple generations wide. And the best the Russian government can do right now is create propaganda TV shows like this one to stir up discontent and animosity toward the U.S. so that their people don't freak out as military spending goes through the roof keeping that (decades old) status quo. Even their aircraft are drawn up on Windows PCs.

@Sovoko65

3 жыл бұрын

@@shakiajones8186 yeah right 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@itinensanzen

3 жыл бұрын

@@shakiajones8186 USAF is the worlds "Premier fighting force". Pathetic brainwashed McCain's buffoon troll spotted. www.defensenews.com/naval/2017/02/06/grounded-nearly-two-thirds-of-us-navys-strike-fighters-cant-fly/

@njegosh1

3 жыл бұрын

@@garwhittaker3743 Plane was downed third night of the illegal aggression on a sovereign state, so no, it didn't made hundreds of strikes!

America: Do not film or touch, there is sensitive electronics. Russia: Guy precedes to climb on a moving Radar truck

@mikecimerian6913

2 жыл бұрын

He is always climbing all over equipment. His mother must have had hell keeping up with him.

@ufsteropolstero6014

Жыл бұрын

@@mikecimerian6913 😄😄 my thoughts exactly, the guy loves his physical stunts and can't stand still for a second. I can imagine his wife telling him to get off climbing towers in children's playgrounds. I pucker up a little bit every time he pokes things in and around extremely sensitive and expensive measuring or manufacturing equipment.

@mikecimerian6913

Жыл бұрын

@@ufsteropolstero6014 Once he was sitting with his back against a BTR52 turret while it was firing its autocannon. This guy is a born stuntman.

Fighters use a much higher band radar. Higher bands allow fighter radar to produce hi definition ground mapping, can see accurately very small targets etc. Stealth aircraft are designed to absorb or reflect away from the enemy this high band radar. But they are not designed to be invisible to low band radar. Remember the British radar towers of WW2, these used the vhf band which was used by television at the time. If you used one of these vhf TVs, whenever an aircraft flew nearby the TV screen would flicker, ghost etc. This effect was turned into radar. The US developed higher band radar during WW2 for their warships, the advantage was that the radar, high on the mast, could see the shell splashes so gunnery was very accurate. Vhf radar went out of fashion but is making a comeback as it can detect stealth aircraft. You see vhf radar on all Chinese warships now so they can detect stealth aircraft. This is a picture of an aircraft with radar operating in the vhf an uhf band. @t Not practible for a modern fighter.

@nick4819

Жыл бұрын

How about you continue on explaining that seeing a target and tracking/guiding a missile to targets are not the same and one is much harder than the other?

Great Documentary!

its funny how the anchor shows up crazily everytime

0:26 - Tom Cruise has left the chat.

Russia is beast in radar technologies

@Orlington17

3 жыл бұрын

yeah, check oderacs experiment! Russian radar was the only one to detect debris in orbit 5cm size and even track them!

@Paytrolah

2 жыл бұрын

Lol these comments aged poorly. Also they were literally assembling BY HAND. They can't even detect Bayraktar...

@richardvernon317

2 жыл бұрын

Humm, Ever worked on them??? I guess not. I have worked on Russian, British and American Radars and the Russians were 10 years behind the British and Americans at the end of the Cold War.

Russian AIR DEFENSE SIMPLY ... THE BEST ...

@garwhittaker3743

3 жыл бұрын

Turkey .

@trololoev

2 жыл бұрын

@@garwhittaker3743 Turkey has air defence?

@abenalif2147

2 жыл бұрын

@@trololoev i think he meant even Turkey one of NATO acknowledged it and bought it

@Paytrolah

2 жыл бұрын

Lol aged poorly.

@mauzoomali

2 жыл бұрын

Byraktar 🎶

Any serbs viewer.congratulation✌️✌️✌️

Simply wow!

I like this radar ❤

Great episode. I've been studying this stuff for several years at least and I'm very impressed with Russian Ground based Radar!!! 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🎉🎉🎉❤️💐🙋🌍 Multi Polar World!!!

i just love these big radar structures they have something i cant explain

Brilliant Engineering 👍

I think this is the first KZread video about radar accuracy experiment!

Russian military stuff just looks intimidating and Alpha.

A love this kinda video pal. Great content. Just found your channel and I’m watching your backlog. 🇬🇧❤️🇷🇺

Thank you spry

Very good 🙏.

i love this guy haha

These are brilliant men. Not chosen for race, gender, sexual orientation, wokeness or diversity. Quite different than the British and American industrial complexes.

@limeallens6160

11 ай бұрын

right on! Down with the wicked witch of the west

This is the art of technology that make the country safe and dependable for citizens of Russian.

I want those ultra durable officechairs...

ধন্যবাদ... thanks

Can't wait for this

@jerry4251

3 жыл бұрын

I don't understand you people put down everything Russia does don't have nothing nice to say the s-300 was not defeated the panther was

Lol this show is funny as hell!!$!

@dirkaminimo4836

4 ай бұрын

I remember the fist one that was wiped out by Neptune missiles in crimea. The second one by HIMARS. Heroyam Slava. They all look super cool though!

Propaganda is strong but the production quality is great!

The AK off chairs ✌️

The United States 🇺🇸 and its Allies must see this Video and learn from the AST Russian.

That's a good use of woman, working on intricate micro welding details

F117 Worlds most advanced and stealthiest aircraft. Shot down in the late 1990s. Retired because it was 'too expensive to maintain' and 'better technology was being developed'.

@pashapasovski5860

3 жыл бұрын

And Lockheed got another trillion to develop a flying cellphone hahaha Why am I laughing, I'm paying for it 💀

@ldkbudda4176

3 жыл бұрын

@@pashapasovski5860 Which cellphone producing RUSSIAN companies do you know? :)

@Daniel-jg8ff

3 жыл бұрын

@@ldkbudda4176 Beeline , Explay, Gresso, Micromax Informatics, Highscreen Megafon , MTS, RoverPC, teXet, Sitronics, Yotaphone

#combatapproved Утвержденная боевая группа: если бы вы могли дублировать на испанский язык или использовать испанские субтитры для этих документальных фильмов, это было бы здорово. Помимо того, что содержание этого канала более занимательно и привлекательно, для многих миллионов пользователей платформы KZread на испанском языке эти документальные фильмы очень профессиональные и качественные _1A_ 👏👍 на этом новом канале. Это было бы действительно бесценно. (У вас отличный ведущий👏 и отличный голосовой переводчик или переводчик английского языка) Поздравляем !!!

I’ve seen a john Deere tractor unfold the same way to fertilize corn fields 😂

@ChiDraconis

3 жыл бұрын

How is the thing going with exploitive charges for electronics?

@mariano7699

3 жыл бұрын

And you're confusing or perplexed by multipurpose use ?

NATO RADAR "specialists", please knock yourself out in comments.

I love it when people spit trash before even watching the full video and think they are smarter than scientists who specialize on anti-stealth...

@JeremyHongelectronics

2 жыл бұрын

As it turns out they don't even have the right chips to do this kind of processing quickly anyways lmao, thank god the Russian semiconductor industry has been so behind and all the good chips are not allowed to be sold to them.

@mini_minnie

Жыл бұрын

Both countries have different doctrines

@divoulos5758

Жыл бұрын

​@Jeremy Hong what does a processor has to do with this The serbian who shot the f117 used a computer with vaccum tubes not even transistors so definitely the processor isn't their limit

haha sell those chairs on amazon, make an ad for them with this narrator ;-)

If control by the AI the UAV ,thats mean no communication the command center. how to detect radar ?

@basargaloran7998

3 жыл бұрын

Didn't understand your question. Can you explain in more detail?

RUS means anti-aircraft radar in russian. makes sense.

So, it didn't read it till it was over 320 feet? Yeah, American pilots can fly underneath that height easily.

@user-nv7kt1yt8l

Жыл бұрын

It's only applies to the copter

@divoulos5758

Жыл бұрын

And manpads can fly in that height two Hell even ww2 antiaircraft guns would decimate aircraft flying that low

❤❤❤❤🎉 Excelente elaboración de los sistemas reactivos e inductivos de las Guías de Onda de Estación de Radar.

The chairs we have in America cannot do that. Russian equipment is quality.

@dirkaminimo4836

4 ай бұрын

It’s so crazy they think the west likes voices like the narrator dude with the growl voice. They truly do not know the west. So far 3 of these have been blown up. One by HARM-ER, a missile that easily detected it.

👍

14:24 WW2 soldier shoots from PK)

Cuando lo traducen al español??

вставка про колесики кресла. убивает.😁

oooooooooooo

If ur waiting right now may I suggest watching my military montages. They r sick. Guaranteed u like them

russia is very great scientist,,, amezing technology so far fram USA rear pure science Unique no copy and clone, i hope someday this philippine country be great like russia, glory to president vlademir putin he is very great activemeant

For the money spent on Stealth, like 3 trillion, we could have upgraded F15,16,18 and my favorite F14 and developed sister drones that could saturate any radar system

@jamescunliffe9872

3 жыл бұрын

Maybe you could buy Firefox hidden in Clint eastwoods barn???;)

23:40. Thought dr Fauci has switched sides for a second.

This is how you know that anyone yapping and caiming that Russia can't produce microchips are just regurgitating pure BS.

❤❤❤💯💯🇩🇿🇩🇿🇷🇺🇷🇺

An amazing nation. Despite very much lower military budget compared to Nato countries, this nation single handedly militarily and scientifically able to defend or protect itself against any attack by any nation or group of nations. This is the result of excellent education from early childhood to the university level. One area where Nato countries excel, in which Russia isn't able to match is in the creation of various intrigues ending up in color revolutions in which governments of the people are removed and replaced with with poodle of Nato. These poodle governments participate with Nato nations in the stealing of the resources of their own nations. One example of a poodle government is the one which was stablished after the Maidan new nazi revolution.

@randomgaming5332

3 жыл бұрын

nah, most of USA or other nato countries money goes into big salaries,base rents,over expensive maintain services and so on. Since russia dosent have base outside its territory(except syria) all money goes directly into the army,research and develop, and also in russia wages are alot lower this helps also. USA is like nazi germany, build overexpensive hardware wich in a conflict wont be able to mass produce like russia is able.

@charlesndri8678

3 жыл бұрын

@@randomgaming5332 base armenia, Kirghizstan, south Ossétie,abkazia ...

@randomgaming5332

3 жыл бұрын

@@charlesndri8678 those were former territories, realy dosent count.

@Paytrolah

2 жыл бұрын

Hahahahah these comments aged so poorly.

Only way for russia to detect stealth planes it to erect huge radars that is visible from space. (in order to get big enough wavelength). You can see em on this vid. Theese things is exactly what the US have built up to defeat the last 30 yrs. They didnt even see the drone without narrowing the search, even when they knew where it was. They couldnt see the drone on radar before it was a 100m up when they pointed the radar at it. And then they say their radars make stealth planes obsolete? . Ok... ok... then why are russia and china desperatly trying to make theire own?

@HeLLFiREGM

3 жыл бұрын

стелсы находят по остаточному излучению. и дальность там приличная 800+км. стелс это миф.

@user-nv7kt1yt8l

Жыл бұрын

Explaining: Russian stealth and US are not the same. Russian are going to end up creating the stealth system that will really working. Not like a US crap.

@divoulos5758

Жыл бұрын

Nobody flies that low Us aircraft will run out of fuel before even getting within 200km from the site

awsome cool mind blowing kinde boring

A stealth aircraft would appear on this radar like any supersonic russian bird 🐦.

So if a US stealth aircraft can be seen by a UHF and a VHF radar than what's it stealth to and why would they say its stealth??? Uhf and vhf are not new

@kwkfortythree39

3 жыл бұрын

Because those type of radars give a very broad, poor hint that something is over there, somewhere. They do not provide tracking information. Also they are very vulnerable to jamming, one area where F-35 excels thanks to its very low RCS. But we'll, if stealth doesn't work why even try to build Su-57

@briananthony4044

3 жыл бұрын

Other fighters which use a much higher band radar. Higher bands allow fighter radar to produce hi definition ground mapping, can see accurately very small targets etc. Stealth aircraft are designed to absorb or reflect away from the enemy this high band radar. But they are not designed to be invisible to low band radar. Remember the British radar towers of WW2, these used the vhf band which was used by television at the time. If you used one of these vhf TVs, whenever an aircraft flew nearby the TV screen would flicker, ghost etc. This effect was turned into radar. The US developed higher band radar during WW2 for their warships, the advantage was that the radar, high on the mast, could see the shell splashes so gunnery was very accurate. Vhf radar went out of fashion but is making a comeback as it can detect stealth aircraft. You see vhf radar on all Chinese warships now so they can detect stealth aircraft. This is a picture of an aircraft with radar operating in the vhf an uhf band. www.cdvandt.org/Lichtenstein%20radars.pdf Not practible for a modern fighter.

@user-vj6dc8le8h

Жыл бұрын

Потому что стелс плохо видит АФАР самолётов.

هاذا الدب الروسي موالدب الداشر

🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺😘😘😘😘😘

Stealth merely makes planes harder to detect, not invisible by any means. If stealth was so "obsolete" then Russia, China, U.K., etc. wouldn't still be developing and/or building them. Tanks have been declared obsolete and are still being developed. Same with the aircraft carrier. Russia is trying to get their carrier operational again. China has a couple and is building more. The Brits have two again. France has one and many other nations have smaller variant. But back to radars, I'll give the Russians credit for putting a lot of emphasis on area denial and having very mobile systems.

@Thillith

3 жыл бұрын

Carriers were never called obsolete in full. They are only obsolete in major power wars, no Russian, US, UK, or Chinese carrier would survive for long if they went against each other, and in that case, yes, they are obsolete. For power projection on poor countries thou, best weapon available. Because nothings says f you like parking a whole airbase next to someones shores who has absolutely no chance of defending against it.

@lordtritus2261

Жыл бұрын

With that logic, soldiers are obsolete because bullets were invented, not to mention arrows, slingers, and fire. But I guess I can't imagine the kinds of ideas that go through the heads of people who get high off of thinking they won the Cold War outright instead of it being a negotiated end yet still having NATO exist during the 90s when nothing could effectively oppose them. At least until Russia decided that the West really cannot be trusted to keep their word.

@divoulos5758

Жыл бұрын

Aircraft carriers are for offensive war Russia doesn't care about carrying offensives in the other side of the world

@Mr.mysterious76

5 ай бұрын

@@Thillith Smartest comment here

i miss soviet union so much. we would be a multi planet state.

It was so unreal unbilevable imagine that radar was built by soviet in 1968, and still shoot down the so called modern warfare by america, mam that was old radar system.. how about now a days russian built the most advance radar system in the world considered it second to none do you think america will try again to fly by in russian airspace?...

well, the serbs detected radiosignals and sent up several missiles in that area. Noone rly hit the plane, but one happend to detonetate close enough to dmg the plane enough for the pilot to deside an ejection was the safest way. Noone had it on radar, noone had it on missilelock. And even more, the 117 is the least steathy of the US stealth planes. It was a fluke. We can all win the lottery.

@pashapasovski5860

3 жыл бұрын

That's exactly what Lockheed said to Congress when they retired F117 and got another trillion for a flying cellphone F35 They wus lucky...except that it wasn't the only one that was hit, Serbia is little country and the others landed in Croatia

@conan670431

3 жыл бұрын

Not what he Serb operator who shot it down said in his book and interview..... it was a direct hit but of course the west needed to believe it was a random shot ..... Also there was a statement years later by 117 pilot who had his wingman hit as well but managed to return home despite the damage.

Tb2 joined the chat lol

@maksimluzin1121

3 жыл бұрын

...and leaved instantly. Turkey, by the first time in this year, refused to sold their drones for export, since they lost more then half of all their drones in Syria and Algeria and they need to increase production of their drones only for own army!

@Samsun55

3 жыл бұрын

@@maksimluzin1121 is this how you comfort yourself? Poor dude lol

@maksimluzin1121

3 жыл бұрын

@@Samsun55 , Don't speak about yourself, publicly, please...

@TocTeplv

3 жыл бұрын

It's usage was totally uneconomical (read - useless) and Turkey didn't achieve nothing in Syria.

@Samsun55

3 жыл бұрын

@@TocTeplv 5k kills in 3 days is a lot in my eyes. And that just using only drones and artillery. Turkey hasnt even used his whole capacity lol.

Good stuff, I respect Russian engineering and their capabilities. One downside of this program is that it shows that everything works just fine, that is not the real world, then again, this is a sales video and not a documentary.

@ultimatebbxofficial7129

3 жыл бұрын

This is why they are showing modern military equipment instead of post soviet equipment. All nations have their outdated war machines.

@Brocambro1

3 жыл бұрын

Agree, you r right on! The damn radar couldn't detect the drone while it was flying on the level of the treetops. Just all propaganda.

@stewartrogerson1369

3 жыл бұрын

To be honest, the drone is a side-show, I believe that it will perform well to its intended design.

@mariano7699

3 жыл бұрын

Not intended for charitable purposes program.

@divoulos5758

Жыл бұрын

​@Brocambro1 the radar tends to have trouble seeing targets through the earth

Stealth hunters? maybe Russia should focus on detecting drones first, because many of Syrian Pantsir-S1 are destroyed like nothing by Turkish drones.

@TCHUBOY

3 жыл бұрын

i heard russia is upgrading the pantsir because of that.

@rhodium1096

3 жыл бұрын

Turkish have lost 60 TB2 drones in Syria and libya and failed to achieve its goals there!

@AblazeNature

3 жыл бұрын

@@rhodium1096 in the meantime how many pantsir, tor and s300 were destroyed? What about drone dominance in Armenia Ajarbaizan war?

@lukabogdanovic4658

3 жыл бұрын

@@AblazeNature not one tor was destroyed in action

@TocTeplv

3 жыл бұрын

Very uninformed post from start to finish.

😂

22:14 thats what fucked the armenians lmao

Singapore 🇸🇬 Military SAF MUST Seriously see this video and Seriously consider buying this Russian made AST (Anti Stealth Technology) as shown and the Russian S400 or S500 AST.

he talking about a institute that detected 1990's first generation self , the F-117A Nighthawk, i think todays stealth with over 30 plus years of advancements and technical know how would be HIGHLY HIGHLY hard to detect , sorry russia #FREEUKRAINE !!!!

considering how much success that bombing compaign had in Serbia I wouldn't think downing 1 f-117 that big of a deal. Its americas first stealth plane which has a bigger cross section then the f22 or f35. Im as confident as the stealth pilots who fly those planes when it comes to their capability. What I see from Russia and the rest of the world is the WANT for a stealth plane or a way to shoot it down lol. Everyone wants what they cant have or build right lol...

@Thillith

3 жыл бұрын

Successes were made only in hitting civilian targets, army left barely touched. I still remember those fancy reports by USA how they shot down that many Serbian planes. Only issue was that Serbs never had that many planes to begin with. Tanks too, when they were pulled out half the world was like "wait what, haven't we destroyed those". Or those fancy harm missiles, about ~780 launched and scored only 3 hits. USA got a lesson in decoys and disguise back then.

@julianpetkov8320

3 жыл бұрын

@@Thillith ...and hiding from the enemy, instead of protecting the infrastructure was "good"? I know that Serbia was overwhelmed, with Russia stabbing them in the back and giving sensitive info to NATO, but they could have at least put up a fight.

@AlenB29

Жыл бұрын

​@@julianpetkov8320your soldiers didnt dare to step a foot into our borders who was hiding?

i dont know why russia loves red star..is that any mean?communism still or just a logo?just asking😊

@maksimluzin1121

3 жыл бұрын

OMG, it is just the official signature of Russian Military Forces. Why Russia should change it? How much it will cost? And WHY? Russian Army has the long great history. After collapse of Soviet Union, the traditions of Russian army is not disappeared. The history is going on... Communism is not in business & relations with it!

@shepherdlavellen3301

3 жыл бұрын

@@maksimluzin1121 no but that does lead to misunderstanding in western countries

@itsmejoe1401

3 жыл бұрын

@@maksimluzin1121 i see..anyway thanks for your information!

@julianpetkov8320

3 жыл бұрын

@0:30 this is the logo of Telekanal Zvezda - the producer of these series. They put the decal on the truck.

The f117 was old by 99, the b2 was the pride of the us air force. Not to mention the f22 was already flying. Has anyone shot a b2 or f22 down?

@RENEBACON

3 жыл бұрын

just you wait Henry Higgins just you wait...

@Thillith

3 жыл бұрын

It's easy to say no one shot it down when it is only flying over countries that have no air defense. You could send P-47 there and it will dominate too.

@limeallens6160

11 ай бұрын

has it been tested in a real war scenario against a super power?

😂😂😂 antique radar couses invisible plane down.. the latest I think is scary

stealth is becoming less and less usefull .

@ravigundam2222

3 жыл бұрын

i can see a stealth future, but stealth has it's limits, and they may have been found.

@vinkaks5684

3 жыл бұрын

Meanwhile Russia makes stealth jet.. Mega lol

@deltacharlieromeo8252

3 жыл бұрын

@@vinkaks5684 coz US doesn't have a stealth detector. That's it.

@Vegane_Atombombe

3 жыл бұрын

@@deltacharlieromeo8252 Because there was no need for it until today. But they are very deep into passive radar, which is the real upcoming "stealth stripper".

@maksimluzin1121

3 жыл бұрын

@@vinkaks5684 , Because the so called 'stealth technology' works quite well in the X-band radio diapason only. An antennas' physical and radio parameters highly depending from the linear size of antenna and length of radio waves. Most fighter and air-to-air missiles uses only the X-band, since it is physically impossible to put inside of them antennas of few meters in linear size! This is why the, so called, 'stealth' solutions were used against radars of fighters and against antennas of homing heads of air-to-air missiles, because almost all of them are physically limited to the X-band diapason!

As for shooting down the f17 the Yugoslavians had spies in Italy that told them when it took off and knew it flew the same flight path 3 times,could listen in on nato communications from the radar planes too the pilot,pointed the radar in the exact position/time where it was going too fly and still could only lock onto it when it opened its weapon bay doors at 5miles,they only turned the radar on when the f17 was close enough too avoid nato detecting it,they knew exactly which flight path it was going too fly and it’s mission and at what time,not to mention it was flying without the growlers,with that much intel it would be a embarrassment if they couldn’t shoot it down don’t know why they are getting excited,I highly doubt they will have that much luck and intel next time,let the S400-S-500 go up against a pair of F18 growlers lol I can assure you the growlers will make sure their seen but that’s about all growlers will let the radars do 😂

@TocTeplv

3 жыл бұрын

that's a widely spread myth. Americans just cant get over it

@pashapasovski5860

3 жыл бұрын

If you know anything about traveling at high speeds in night,in atmospheric conditions, wind,air pressure and much more! There isn't a spy in the World, or computer that could predict the exact location in time and space of a stealth aircraft! Only children would believe Lockheed's excuses for having to dump another trillion of taxpayers money into a complete bullshit concept!

@Paytrolah

2 жыл бұрын

@@TocTeplv You literally can't even detect Bayraktar.

@TocTeplv

2 жыл бұрын

@@Paytrolah Yes, I can

@user-nj5si7ms5l

Жыл бұрын

Миф о Стелсе , Америке стыдно признаться ,что они облажались по полной!

Which cellphone producing RUSSIAN companies do you know? :)::

@Sovoko65

3 жыл бұрын

Why would they🤣

LOL RUSSIAN MILITARY EQUIPMENT. WHY SAY THAT ABOUT A COMPUTER CHAIR

i know this a bot-chat here basically, but you have to adore that little russian boy, climbing and grabbing all the things :D also - showing 1960s production processes and selling it as it would be the latest shit. All spiked up with a little misogynism, too. Oh, how I love that little propaganda series. Edit: I am somewhat dissapointed though... there has been no rainchaimber test! I think those systems just don't work in rain, then! ;)

@pashapasovski5860

3 жыл бұрын

Bubi, Bubi but hurt much 😢

@jamescunliffe9872

3 жыл бұрын

@@pashapasovski5860 lol

anoying voiceover ! CHANGE IT !

@diamondmm

3 жыл бұрын

Its like watchin a movie trailer for 50 mins ffs

@marcuswelch4515

3 жыл бұрын

@@diamondmm That's why it's awesome.

Petemkin village

Interesting contrast between a Russian made documentary and a western one. In an American documentary they'll mention aspects of Russian weapons and why they need to be taken seriously. Overall, they're much more respectful and don't underestimate potential. Whereas, all they do on these Russian made programs are talk about how American weapons are crap and not to be worried about - because "they'll beat them all". Hard to imagine a country (former union) seeing so much war, but not learning you disrespect and underestimate your foe at your own peril.

@WorldCitizenX

3 жыл бұрын

Are you joking? The US propaganda is known to be huge since ever

Stealth is Scam

That filmmaker it's annoying

Russia

Everything is good about this show except the host's voice.

This program needs a real narrator not an actor.

these systems failed in armenia when azarbaijan destroyed them all with turkish drones.

@shepherdlavellen3301

3 жыл бұрын

probably because drones don't have large enough radar cross section, but still, lol

@rhodium1096

3 жыл бұрын

That system are not deployed in Armenia...anyway old soviet system have shot down Turkish and Israeli drones in Armenia...and Iran have shot down all drones which have approched to its borders

@itinensanzen

3 жыл бұрын

the only problem you have is lack of proof and evidence

@lukabogdanovic4658

3 жыл бұрын

Wtf are you on about

@Daniel-jg8ff

3 жыл бұрын

No they didnt

Any air defense system is overrated, S-300 was defeated by Turkish drones, what to expect from stealth aircrafts vs these systems!!

@lukabogdanovic4658

3 жыл бұрын

S 300ps used by armenia is from 1985 and it isnt meant to destroy drones.Units like tunghuska are but Armenia dosn't have those and even if they did their training isn't on the standard of the Russian army.

@nomorepetrenko

3 жыл бұрын

Brother😂😂. Just stop😂. The s400 showed turkey who's boss. After they were installed in Syria they dare not enter the Russian no flyzones😂. I'm a war analyst I know

@darhammora7867

3 жыл бұрын

@@nomorepetrenko not true, Turkish F-16s bombs Syrian troops many times in the last few years, they even shutdowned many Syrian Su-24s

@nomorepetrenko

3 жыл бұрын

@@darhammora7867 the su 24 was before the s400 and the troops are not bombed by air they air targeted with artillery strikes.

@darhammora7867

3 жыл бұрын

@@nomorepetrenko no I am not talking about the Russian Su-24 of 2015, the 2 Syrian Su-24s of 2020

Lmao... this show is great to show off stuff.....but why the bullshit lying propaganda? Literally almost every episode pretends as if the "USSR/Russia has invented all of these technologies and the West is stealing them all!" How about you open up any of those electronics on any of your vehicles...and lets show the Russian people where all the microchips and circuits are made? I'll give you a hint....not a single one is made in Russia. Russia hasn't invented anything that the West wants. The USSR on the other, they did actually have some smart people(most of them were from occupied nations like Ukraine, Baltics, Far East, etc).

@kathleenadams6421

Жыл бұрын

We try to steal what we don’t have. Whether it’s technology or another nationsresources. I have witnessed 70 years and nothing has changed in the US.

Haha those Russian radars are only good at swatting flies because Russian radars could not detect Turkish drones many times already.

@TocTeplv

3 жыл бұрын

Dont push your luck, boy. I dont remember Turkey winning over Russia. Seven times out of seven. Couple of years ago Turkish nation was humiliated by Russian tourist travel ban. Come on...

@rerbitd7094

3 жыл бұрын

Do not frighten an adult uncle with children's toys. He will put him in the corner and spank him with a belt.

@jamescunliffe9872

3 жыл бұрын

@@rerbitd7094 lol

@Daniel-jg8ff

3 жыл бұрын

They detected them but a sam-system is quit ineffective if it has launched all its missiles or if its in transportmode

This Garbage probably constantly overheats

@deadliftalot

3 жыл бұрын

@Nikolai Golikov sounds impossible today but 20 -50 years later it would be common

@deltacharlieromeo8252

3 жыл бұрын

Proof?

@pallabjyotidas1684

3 жыл бұрын

Why will it overheat?

@TT-cf8dz

3 жыл бұрын

@Proloop Under just wanna see how =))))) without nuclear weapons u have no chance.

@TocTeplv

3 жыл бұрын

Or you are stupid.

This host really likes physical stunts.