For those who feel inclined to make a comment about how tired I look, or how my eyes look: this is a combination of the redness of the eczema (skin condition) around my eyes as well as my first try at lighting my new studio while it’s still being built (the light stand was too high cause shadows in my eye sockets. Any jokes about how I look will be deleted. Thanks in advance for your understanding.

@Beatchiefs

3 жыл бұрын

You don’t even have to explain! They just should shut their mouth’s

@WS-bk7uu

3 жыл бұрын

Having two kids probably doesn't help either, but you look great! :)

@YourFriendJeff

3 жыл бұрын

Im sorry you're getting comments like that! This is a really informative video and those are unnecessary comments people are making. I have the same skin condition around my eyes as well. Keep up the good work!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for thenckmment my friend!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Yup. No time for sleep lol

Reggiie, huge congratulations on your oh so much improved PROFESSIONAL delivery! SO much better than non essential distracting repetitive music! Thank you so much and again congratulations !!!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Why are you congratulating me?

Ah that 35mm f2 selloff killed me - but I understand. Everyone loves the f1.4 but I prefer the snappy af of the 35 f2 and amazing iq. My fav all around lens in my roster.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

It’s not a bad lens. I just didn’t use it haha.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Af is fast enough for weddings for me

@PerryCarbonell

3 жыл бұрын

haha same here.. that and the mitakon which i both adore!

@btswilliam

3 жыл бұрын

I have the f1.4 and I totally love it but I did wish that I had the f2 version with weatherproofing so I could have went outside for some rain mood shooting.

@ThisIsWideAngle

3 жыл бұрын

I love the 35 1.4 for it's style, the 35mm 2 for it's snappyness and the compact design. I also now own the viltrox 35mm 1.4 because the Fuji both are not good for Video and now i don't know which one to sell even though it would be rediculous to keep all three. Can anybody help me?

Thanks Reggie. Excellent summary. Hoping things get better.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

What do you mean by better?

I respect your transparency with your audience. Times are tough rn, and glass retains value well. Might as well offload stuff that don’t do the job you need.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly

Nice video! i have a XT4 and XT3, i tried to many fuji lenses but i ended with 2 Sigma's 18-35 1.8 with fringer adapter and fuji 50-140 2.8, im happy with this kit for wedding filmmaking

@fwfeo

3 жыл бұрын

How does the sigma focus with an adapter? A f/1.8 zoom is fantastic on any system!

Nice video, you are right, the 18-55 f2.8-4 is great for video!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Yes!

Hey, Reggie-- I just wanted to say thank you for your videos. I have really enjoyed them. I would point to you (and a couple of other guys) as being crucial to my getting into the Fuji system about 2.5 years ago. I am in agreement with most of your evaluations here. I bought the 10-24 not long ago and have been trying to use it for various things, but it is certainly NOT the 16 1.4. There are several products that you've mentioned over time that have found your way into my gear bag(s). Keep up the good work, and thanks again.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Glad you share the same sentiment! If I was more in line with landscape shooting or maybe action sports, I can see the 10-24 being in line with those types of genres. But yes, for the ytpe of stuff I shoot, the 16mm 1.4 is just a phenomenal piece of kit :)

Interesting perspectives. Some of these were on my to “try or buy” list, so I appreciate this video. Some I own. I agree with your comments about the 23 and 35 f2. Close focusing is especially soft on the 23 f2. But I quite like the 10-24 f4.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comment

Please suggest better performer older xf23mm f1.4 r vs viltrox 23mm f1.4. Thanks

Thats apart of the lens rotation process. They come and go. I just recently traded my 16mmf2.8 and 35mmf2 for the 50mmf2 and cash but my silver 23mmf2 will make up for the first 2 being sold but the 23mmf2 is a beast for sure! Dope video! I appreciate your reasons for letting certain lens kits go.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comment my friend!

What’s one prime lens I could use for strictly video? I’m looking for a more close focal length.

So true about personal preference. For example, I prefer zoom lenses whereas my spouse prefers primes. That said, In addition to the XT4, I have the X100V which is great for just having a good quality compact camera. Amazingly, I like the X100V despite it not having a zoom or fully articulating screen or image stabilization. Then again those are all on the XT4 which I love, especially with the collection of zooms (XF 10-24, 16-80, 50-140, 100-400; and the handy lightweight XC 50-230). As you said, it's about what you want to do with it, and the 2 cameras are used for different purposes.

Hey Reggie! Hope you are doing well in these strange times! Of the lenses you sold I still own the 18-55. And I must admit: it's my least used lens. I like it because it's small enough to put in a throuser pocket. Mostly used for casual shooting. But it shines for video with stabilisiation at 18mm

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Jaap Kamstra agree with you on the video!

Great hearing your thoughts and rational. Very logical without letting emotion make the decision. The Fuji fast primes are my favorite. Love the way they render and their size is not to big compared to full frame.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Love the fuji primes as well! What’s your favorite?

@paulthomas8986

3 жыл бұрын

Reggie Ballesteros I I have the 23 1.4 and 35 1.4. Optically the 23 is a better lens. More contrast, sharper wide open, less purple fringe, but I just like the feel of the images with the 35 1.4. They have that vintage feel to them. I wish it was like 2mm wider field of view. I have used the mitakon 35 0.95 and that lens is slightly wider. It seems to work better indoors when you are cramped for space. That lens is a boat anchor though and I don’t like the minimal focus distance. The bokeh is pretty sweet though. I just keep going back to the 35 1.4. Love how small and light it is too. And the sexy metal lens hood, lol.

Hi Reggie, if you have to choose between the XF23mmf2 or the Viltrox 23mmf1.4, which one would you go with?

@Reggiebphoto

8 ай бұрын

The Fuji 23mm f/1.4 mk ii

@Jgheiler

8 ай бұрын

​@Reggiebphoto haha, besides that one. I actually have it, but it balances so bad on my xt5 :(

I almost bought the 18mm but now I'm using my 18-55 as a 18mm lens. The 2.8 is much sharper than the pancake. And I'm using the 50-140 a lot for my event and concertphotography. Heavy and expensive. Almost sold it but can't do without her ;-)

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Awesome!

I can’t believe you said that about the 27mm. Blasphemy!! Great video!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

It’s all preference. I made the warning a few times

Great video. I loved how u replaced the 23f2 for the 18f2. Everyone (in forum) thought i was mad for doing that so I’m glad a professional like you did it. I’m finding it really hard to get good pics from it though as not used to the focal length. If you have any tips I’d be hugely grateful!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Just keep at it. Practice is the key with wide angle lenses

@andreak4280

3 жыл бұрын

AND... move in a bit closer when you can 😉

From the 7 lenses you mentioned I have 23 f2 and 35 f2 and I like them. The begemoth lenses, I just do not buy any more for fuji. If I want to play begemoth, I can use canon lenses with fringer adapter, but do so rarely. The tip you are trying to give here is "Go with little primes". Totally agree.

Reggie- Sorry to hear you had to sell off some gear due to the pandemic and loss of income.. hoping things are looking up.

@MottiWolkenbruch

3 жыл бұрын

Best wishes from me too, buddy!

Since I got into the system on a budget with a beat up $200 xe1 body I got an adapter for my Canon a series lenses and ended up getting a lens turbo for m42 lenses and a Helios 44-6 and that's a combo I enjoy. Though it sounds like manual focus isn't your thing. Then again I have a weird thing for Soviet lenses. Not for everyone, but a fun thing to try that won't break the bank.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Awesome!

really inspiring video's man, you're awesome!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the kind words!

I have noticed that the 35mm 1.2 does not give as much light as the 18-55mm 2.8 to 4.5 My take on this is down to the fact that it has a much smaller front element. So with that what's your take on the 2.8 16mm-55mm as considering it has a massive front element to gather all that light could it perform as well as the 1.4s with smaller front elements?

At first I didn’t like 35mm f/1.4 but now I can appreciate the little magic that comes out of that lens, all I’m craving for is 16mm f1.4 my ultimate dream lens God will definitely bless me with some bread soon.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Lol. Hope you get your dream team soon

Hey Reggie, I am planning for Fuji X-S10 for my baby photography. Could you suggest a great lens?

@veeaa

3 жыл бұрын

I got my X-S10 for the same reason but she's a toddler already! I got the Viltrox 23mm f1.4. I suggest you choose between Viltrox 23mm f1.4, Viltrox 35mm f1.4 and Fuji XC 35mm F2. It's a tough choice between 23 and 35.

@djtruedomination

3 жыл бұрын

@@veeaa The Viltrox 23mm is an exquisite lens.

If you ever get back into the walk around video lens territory, I encourage the 16-80 over the 18-55. It's actually not that heavy/bulky . It lives on my X-T30 (with grip) and balances fairly well. I found it awesome for street photography in Mexico as it stayed on my camera during that trip . I was scared to change lenses with all the flying dirt /dust there lol.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I still prefer the 2.8 availability. But thanks for the suggestion!

@batdroid2705

3 жыл бұрын

I am still trying to decide between these 2. Hopefully will get to try them out soon

What's the best Fuji kit lens for video? 18-55mm or 16-80mm?

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I prefer the 18-55

I only own one you just referred...the 35mm f2...and although I'm happy with it...I don't do vídeo, just street photography and some wristswatches (kinda my hobby) with the help of macrotubes...I wonder if I can get better shallow depth of field with the 35mm f1.4? Any advice? Thanks 👍

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

If you’re main goal is shallow Dof, the 35 1.4 will do better in that regard

I think you would enjoy the Olympus system. 12-45 f4, 30mm macro f3.5, 12-40 f2.8 and the 17mm f1.8. I shoot a E-M1 mark iii Body. I think you would like the colors and the skin tones. I shoot Fuji as well. The Fuji and Olympus systems are both a lot of fun to use. just my opinion.

Great video, and really appreciate the insight on the 10-24. Kind of in the same situation, two toddlers and was looking for a vlog/documentary lens with a wide angle. Currently using the 23 f2 as my main lens, but dang it if I'm not tempted now by the 18mm f2.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

The 18 f2 af is not that great for vlog af. The 18-55 does better here or the 16mm 1.4 if you’re using a shotgun mic

@andrewp7002

3 жыл бұрын

I don't agree about the 10-24. It is not a heavy lens for what it is, and of course, you don't have to shoot 10mm, but it is handy to have that available if you're in a tight spot.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

For me it was heavy in comparision to other options. But yes I’m sure it is lighter than others

If possible, please test the 55-200mm for portraits. I'm just curious how this lens perform with portraiture.

@djtruedomination

3 жыл бұрын

To me it works for portraiture

Nice video Reggie. Don't be afraid to leave some space in your sentences, this felt a little bit 'chopped up' and jolty to the point where it was a bit distracting. In terms of lenses, I own the X-T3 with the 18-55 and 35mm F2 mainly for family documentary stuff. I really love the responsiveness of the 35mm F2 for chasing a toddler. Thinking about selling the 18-55 though as I really struggle with zooms. Interested to check out your 18/2 video!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the feedback! Sorry if it was distracting.

Mitakon is my special project lens. A keeper in my personal arsenal. As well as the 35 f2.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Yes def a specialty lens!

@djtruedomination

3 жыл бұрын

That’s an awesome lens for niche shots

Hi Reggie I’ve just subscribed to your channel, which is great btw. I’m thinking of moving from Panasonic m4/3 to Fuji, probably the XT3. As you are discussing lenses in this video, what do you recommend for a Fuji newbie who is into mainly landscape, forestry/woodland and family documentary/portraiture. I would look at 3 lenses to start with? Thank you!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Ultimately it depends on your budget

@petes7432

3 жыл бұрын

Reggie Ballesteros Budget isn’t an issue.

@christophkrull5223

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Pete, i own the Lumix G9 since release and i‘m very happy with it. A few months ago i‘ve bought a used X-T2 with the 35mm f2 lens. It’s a handy little kit, fun to use and it takes good pictures. For the G9 i‘m using the Panasonic Leica Nocticron, the Panasonic Leica 8-18 and the Olympus Pro 12-40mm f2.8 and in comparison to the x-t2 these pictures mostly looks better, sharper with much more contrast. Rent a X-T and test it, before you buy one.

@petes7432

3 жыл бұрын

Christoph Krull thanks Christoph that’s a good tip. As an aside I have been reviewing some XT-3 raw images and I’m struggling to see an improvement compared to my G9 raw images. I think I will continue with MFT for the foreseeable future..

@christophkrull5660

3 жыл бұрын

@@petes7432 yes, that's right. If any improvement compared to the G9 exists, than mostly in the ISO performance i think, but with a fast, mostly stabilized lens you can compensate it. I will use my X-T2 in addition to my lovely G9 for my next weddingshoot, so that i've a second camerabody and not have to switch lenses so many times but after that i'm not sure if i'm selling the X-T again.

Ahah here I am with the kit lens only. Gonna have to try out some new lenses as well! Thanks for the video bro :)

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

You’re welcomed!

@metroskunk3000

3 жыл бұрын

Ha ha. Me, too man. I have the kit lens and 35 f/2. I like the 35 a lot though. This was an informative video.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Glad to help

Wow this was more interesting than gear videos usually are. Some of the reasons you mentioned as cons for you are actually positives for me. Im not expecting everyone to agree with me of course I just never thought it would be so varied where a con for someone is a plus for someone else. Id be curious to see what you think about the fuji 60mm lens as well. It seems like a must have lens for me but given what you mentioned im guessing you potentially wouldnt like it or would probably prefer the 56mm f1.2 instead.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Yup, it’s all a preference game.

I'm sorry to hear about the financial hardships. The 35mm f/2 is actually my favourite lens and I use it mainly for street photography. The 35mm in combination with Acros profile give some pretty spectacular pictures SOOC. But for wedding photography I can understand it's not fast enough. A couple of months ago I also bought the 23mm f/2 for street photography and I wasn't impressed by it. While the image quality is certainly owkey, it didn't invoke the same feeling as pictures of the 35mm f/2.

I'm an Olympus shooter but I want to keep up to date with FujiFilm so I watch yours and Omar's video. Had a question, what I understand with FujiFilm has something similar to Pro-capture mode on the Olympus where when 1/2 pressing the shutter or pressing the back button, it rolls full RAW images in high or low sequential burst until you press down the shutter and it saves multiple shots prior to the photo you shot. If Fujifilm does have that, I feel like it is never mentioned and like to see how this works.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I don’t use this feature and have never tried it. But I know what you’re talking about. I’ll look into it

@RobShootPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

@@Reggiebphoto I look forward to it. Thank you!

good vid. thanks for the effort and the sharing. i am an appreciative subscriber. what is your preferred tele option? stay well. thumbs up.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

50 1.0 most shots. 50-140 for more reach

Great vid Reg! I'm about to commit the ultimate sin and sell my 16mm 1.4 only because I have a lot of other lenses and it has value. I know ill regret it one day. I sold off 23 f2, 10-24, 56 1.2 for various reasons (mainly for money and lack of use) and I'm still carrying too much!

Viltrox 85mm and Fujifilm 90mm would be my suggestion for the next tests.

I myself noticed that I either like wide or telephoto for landscape, street and portrait. Full Frame equivalent of 28-50mm is too vague for me.

@Reggiebphoto

2 жыл бұрын

Got it. Good observation

Hello Reggie, do you shoot wedding video, with 35 F14 (do you have some exemple) I? Thank you for your good work !

@tanke1818

3 жыл бұрын

He has a bunch of videos with them. Check them out. Good content.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I don’t do weddign videography. But I shoot a lot of weddign photos with the 35mm 1.4

@fabpicture_com

3 жыл бұрын

@@Reggiebphoto OK that's what i knew, but I thought "maybe he is hidding a good wedding videgrapher thing"

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Haha no. I’ve done wedding video one time and prefer not to do it again

@fabpicture_com

3 жыл бұрын

@@Reggiebphoto now you have to show us !

so you would recommend the 90mm f2??

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I made a separate video on it

@PerryCarbonell

3 жыл бұрын

i sold my 56 1.2 because i preferred to keep my 90mm f2 for port work. The 90mm is a beast!

If your favorite walk-around focal length is 28mm equiv, you should try the fuji xf10

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Even better my fave all time cam was the x70

Thanks!

I bought and sold the Viltrox 23 twice :D first I bought the old version which was really bad, then I got the new and silent STM version which was okay, but the way how it renders just not what I like. My experience was like it always burnt out the skin, contrast was too high, and I had to edit every single photos to make the horrendous CA go away... since I wanted to use the 23mm for SOOC shots, I just got the XF 23mm F/1.4 WR LM which I really love

Have u tried the fuji 8-16mm f2.8 ,oh wait ,it’s f2.8,lol,but I really am thinking about this lens for crowd shots and landscapes ,event photography in tight quarters and wide shots in concerts or sports

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I haven’t tried it yet

I got a xc 16-50 for $65. About to buy my xt3. Just a start until I buy a prime or 2

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Awesome!

It's funny, because I'm starting my Fuji lens collection and the first lens I sent back was the 18mm f/2 pancake! It's great on paper, but I didn't like he ow loud and clanky it was!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

People have different needs haha. I love the 18 f2

When you said you wanted a smaller lens than the 23mm f2, I almost spit out my fruit loops...lol..the only thing smaller is that pancake lens. I really enjoy the 23mm I keep it on my T2.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

The 18mm f2 is smaller

@keithjohnson2863

3 жыл бұрын

There are 6 X-mount lenses made by Fujifilm that are smaller than the 23 f2. In no particular order: 18 f2, 27 f2.8, 16 f.2.8, XF 35 f2, XC 35 f2, XC 15-45 f3.5-5.6.

@RandyPollock

3 жыл бұрын

@@keithjohnson2863 was just joking around with the video, my hat off to you for either looking this up or knowing it off the top of your head that is commendable

@keithjohnson2863

3 жыл бұрын

@@RandyPollock I put together a bag for my X-T30 that includes the 27, 18 and 15-45. I Just sold the XF35 f2. The buyer for my 16 f2.8 flaked so that will be reposted. The 35 and 16 were too big for the kit I wanted, plus those focal lengths were outside of my day to day use cases.

@blakemartin1700

3 жыл бұрын

@@keithjohnson2863 awesome kit still. Yeah the 23mm f2 is pretty big for the f2 series. I was surprised when I got it. Love my 16mm f2.8 though, super sharp.

and the 33mm 1.4 from viltrox ? what do you think about it ?

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I made a video on it: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h4Wtt8VsecS-Xco.html

@guich.mp4

3 жыл бұрын

@@Reggiebphoto thanks !!

@djtruedomination

3 жыл бұрын

That lens is great

Hard choices for some. I try not to be discouraged by your opinion as mainly you use lenses for earning money so if I were in your shoes surely I would go for best quality lenses as the money spend would return. These days are far behind me(I had 2-3 years of photo sessions and weddings) and now I moved to Fuji system(From ff Canon) for portability. What I'm trying to state is that I have no money to spend for a top lens and I prefer to keep my WR lenses so I could take my Fuji for hiking etc. I'm now testing my 27mm which made my x-pro2 extremely portable and this is more important than lousy(yup) 2.8 aperture. I think we should all get the lenses that would work for US and allow us to take pictures not to state 'uhh this lens is soo heavy and bulky and my camera is too heavy' ;)

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

That’s what I’m stating in this video, the lenses thst work for me. They were not suggestions to you. Just basically reporting what works for me and what doesn’t. I made it very clear in the intro that I’m not bashing on any of the lenses

The Viltron 23mm F1.4 focus distance is 30cm, Fuji 23mm F1.4 is 28cm. Just wondering does that 2cm of focus distance worth the extra dollars?

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

For me yes.

@emilibatullin583

3 жыл бұрын

Very strange, I've watched reviews and there were lot more than 2cm. Are you sure about it?

@wayne19871224

3 жыл бұрын

@@emilibatullin583 I’m not sure coz I don’t own either. The specs are from their official website.

What is your opinion on the rumored xf18 f1.4 on fuji lenses road map? For me I'm very excited about it. And yeah, congrats on becoming x photographer.. YOU deserve it man... Great work. +1 sub coming to you. Thanks.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Super excited for it. It’s the lens I’ve always wanted in the fuji x system

I hope things are better for you.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

👍🏽

I know you're locked in on the Fujinon 90mm, but I'd urge you to rent the 80mm macro f/2.8. The only downside to this is the aperture is a bit on the high side, but with proper lighting equipment, I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a better lens for portraiture AND macro work. It has a gorgeous cat's eye bokeh and is, to date, my favorite Fuji lens! But in the interests of full disclosure, it's a bit heavy.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Considering I own the 50-140 now, it might be a good reason for me to switch out my 90 for the 80

@kevinriley5847

3 жыл бұрын

@@Reggiebphoto ...so -- are you finding that you use your 50-140 more for weddings than your 90?

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I haven’t had much weddings this year

@WS-bk7uu

3 жыл бұрын

@@Reggiebphoto I was half expecting you to mention the 50-140 as one of your sold lenses. How do you like it?

I also sold a bunch. Mainly for overlap. I kept my new XF 16-80 f/4 (the 16-55 is great but just to heavy for a citywalk), my XF 10-24 f/4 (for interior shots) and my XF 23 f/1.4. From selling these lenses, my X-T3 and X100F I got the X-T4 and X100V. Very happy with it.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comment!

Hey Reggie, I just wanted to say thanks for making these vids! It was your vids and others that motivated me to make the jump from a Canon 6D to Fujifilm X-T2 for my landscape and portrait photography about 1.5 years ago. I enjoy the perspective you bring to the table when it comes to using Fujifilm and I look forward to seeing more vids in the future! In regards to the question you asked at the end of the video, I wonder if you've tried the 50-140mm f2.8? I've rented it a couple times and I did enjoy the fast focusing, easy framing with zooming, and OIS. However it is a bit of a behemoth! Also, I found that at some point, when it gets too dark, that the 56mm f1.2 does a better job focusing. I'd love to hear your experience with the 50-140 and if you haven't tried it, I think you ought to give it a go and tell us what you think about it in your next vid! Maybe it'd be cool to talk about it in context with the other Fuji zoom lenses? I'm hoping to round out the long end of my kit someday!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I do own it as of recently, however I don’t use it often. Like you said it’s too big for my shooting style. I use it simply for church weddings with space restrictions

what about a 16-55 2.8?

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

ah, i don't really have any desire to try that lens at all, haha. but perhaps one day

Hi Reggie, thanks for this video. Could you please make a comparison video among Fujinon 18-55/16-55/16-80 lenses! It'll be really helpful. Thanks in advance!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the request. I’ll see what I can do, but I don’t own either of those lenses at the moment

@pforpramit

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Reggie! Well in that case, could you please suggest which one among them will be a better buy in terms of a preferable all-in-one lens for enthusiast-beginner, considering both price and performance? Also, I'm bit of confused whether I should go for the good old XT3 or the new XT4! Thanks in advance.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I still prefer the 18-55. It’s a proven lens, compact, great ois, and better low light than the 16-80. It’s a slam dunk in my opinion

@pforpramit

3 жыл бұрын

Wow, thanks again Reggie! Yeah, despite having constant f2.8 aperture, that 16-55 one happens to be much more pricey, heavy as well as lacks OIS. Since, I'm going to buy the 18-55 kit, additionally how will 16mm f1.4 be, say especially for landscape or some occasional night sky photography?

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

The 16 1.4 is one of my favorite lenses! For night and landscape tho, you don’t need the 1.4 as you’d likely use a tripod. But for everyday use the 16 is an awesome performer

Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 fringer adapter ;)

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

😉

@JaapKroon

3 жыл бұрын

It's magic!

Which lens should I review next?

@NObbie

3 жыл бұрын

90mm f2!!

@kvncnls

3 жыл бұрын

I dunno, but holy cow, you're from the West Coast, but posting this early?? WHEN DO YOU SLEEP REGGIE?!

@RandyPollock

3 жыл бұрын

@@NObbie The 90mm f2 is a beautiful portrait lens, it was the first lens I bought 3 years ago

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I already did a review on this :)

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I don’t bro -_-

Yall are spoiled by auto focus these days. When I started photography there were no auto focus lenses. No deleting of photos. You had to work fast and precise, because there was no post cropping and processing. If you practice, practice, practice, your manual focusing, you'll find it second nature and open the world of some of the best lenses for great prices..

@cornlourd

3 жыл бұрын

I agree (Vintage Canon FD lenses are awesome) but I guess conveniences brought upon by advancements in tech raises the current standard. I guess we can practice banging 2 rocks together to make a fire, but we have stoves for that now.

@bh9262

3 жыл бұрын

@@cornlourd Many brand new lenses are manual focusing. Not just the vintage lenses. I have a 12mm Rokinon that is manual focus and it's a fantastic lens

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your comment and opinion. Much appreciated my friend

i only have the 16 f1.4 for around two years now, and i don't need any other lens. That one is just fantastic for everything i need to do :p

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

thats my favorite lens by far!

@BTMovieSecondChannel

3 жыл бұрын

I don't like the wideness for everything I do and I don't focus that close so often, but I keep coming back to it due to the quality of the glass. The sharpness, contrast and especially the colors are fantastic and really something I notice compared to my other most used lens, the 35mm f2.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

🙌🏽

nice vid bro

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks

the audio on this video was recorded with only a rode videomicro?

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Video micro connected to h4n

I suv. I like the 56 1.2

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Yes it’s a great lens!

Subscribed

question, where are these vlogs??????

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

they are under "vlogs" playlist.

AHH good boy Reggie - getting rid of that crappy kit lens. I had 3 of those monstrosities over as many years and came to hate that lens. Everybody was talking about this optical Nirvana that I was searching for, but all I got was unsharp images wide open - especially at the 55mm end where I do portraits and street. I never shoot landscapes and always only people, therefore I always need to shoot my lenses wide open and the kit lens was a real disappointment. After 3 different copies, I realised it was a dud. After finally getting the magical 16-55, I then found the quality I was searching for. That now stays 'glued' onto one of my X-H1's and the 90mm on the other. This is all the kit I need. I also agree with you on the 'Fuji Crons'. I don't have the 35mm, but I have the 23mm and it just sits in the cupboard like yours and never gets used. My 16-55 is much sharper, the images much more crisp and punchy wide open. I think those 'crons' were a big disappointment for people. Oh well, who cares! Fuji have paid due recompense of their sins by making that beautiful 16-55 and the 90mm F2!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I love the 18-55. The 16-55 isn’t something I prefer

@onegrapefruitlover

3 жыл бұрын

The f2s are for the people who don't like lugging around a huge zoom (?)

hii Reggie !

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Hello Roy!

Dimo kami maloloko ogie

Nice review. Please give me discount on your RBP Ultimate Bundle.. love your works.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comment. Sign up for my notification squad and you’ll be notified of the next preset sale

You’ll be buying them back later🤓😂

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Haha sure 😂

@lovelogackn274

3 жыл бұрын

On point

not for 23 f2 it fit with Xpro

Any lens u want to give away Reg,u know where u can find me ,lol

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

ogie alcasid bagsakan

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

😂

nice.. and im stuck with my fujifilm16mm 2.8 and nikon 35mm... i wish i have a zoom lens 😂😂

Reggie, you OK? Last video I saw and especially in this one (I DO enjoy your videos), you look like you haven't slept in a week. Your eyes keep closing. And they don't have any "sparkle". Just concerned about you.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Please read my pinned comment.

@Nathansmithphotography

3 жыл бұрын

@@Reggiebphoto Sorry, didn't see that. Once the lighting gets fixed that will help as well. Rock on!

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

This is a combination of my eczema and my lighting mistake. I have excess scar tissue on my eye lids due to eczema rashes on my eyes thst I’ve had since I was in grade school. Over 20 years it’s built up to give a look like I’m tired whenever the lighting isn’t pristine. My eczema has also been flaring up more recently.

Hey Reggie, we want to see the mother of the toddlers :D :D

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I don’t show her often for privacy reasons haha

nice video

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Ollie

Doesn't like the 23/2, but buys a X100V that sports a fixed 23/2? lolwot... hehe...

@Reggiebphoto

Жыл бұрын

Yup. Cause the 23 f2 is garbage at close focus. But the 23 f2 on the x100v is superb at minimal focus.

@SummersSnaps

Жыл бұрын

@@Reggiebphoto Good to know. I just bought a 23/2 for myself as a wee xmas pressie (sitting under the tree!). I was a little torn over getting it... but it was a sweet deal so decided to just go for it. Don't mind me, I'm just ball busting :D I do find it odd that the X100V is SO well received, yet the actual 23/2 lens from fuji much less so. I have heard many say the close focusing (of the 23/2) is not great, but then equally many that say it is blown way out of proportions. Considering portraits are my thing, I don't think I will heavily care if things are a tad soft (i'm not doing fashion shoots here), I often use filters to soften and take the digital edge off a lot of my work anyway. Maybe there is charm in the less than ideal close focusing IQ of the 23/2, you just need to be aware of it? Guess I'll find out... I have to say, I find Fuji really dropped the ball on their 23, 33mm (and now 56mm) offerings, staples on any system. I feel they could be doing better here and are being a bit lazy if I'm honest. The 90/2 however is an incredible optic that ticks all the boxes, LM, WR, IQ and AF. The really made a woopsie not putting the LM in the new 56 :S

@Reggiebphoto

Жыл бұрын

They are not the same lens at all. They have shared focal length and aperture but the optical designs are not the same.

@SummersSnaps

Жыл бұрын

@@Reggiebphoto Ok dokey, so again sounds like Fuji dropped the ball on the dedicated 23/2 lens. Mind you, any single lens body system should be tweaked to giving the utmost best for IQ, so it's prolly not fair or realistic perhaps to compare the X100V with the 23/2. I should try and find someone whom has done such comparisons tho! Not once did it come up during my general 23/2 KZread searching...

@Reggiebphoto

Жыл бұрын

Because people buy them for different reasons. Buying a camera + prime lens is different than buying a fixed lens camera of the same focal length

When you give away camera stuff next time give me a call ok?

Why not just get rid of fujifilm altogether. Tell us how you really feel.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I have other lenses that I do like. What system do you prefer my friend?

@IAmDamiani

3 жыл бұрын

Reggie Ballesteros Just switched over from Canon R to Fujifilm XT-3. Best decision I have ever made.

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Oh then what was the reasoning for your original comment?

@MarcoTheHEXican

3 жыл бұрын

@@IAmDamiani Make no sense

@IAmDamiani

3 жыл бұрын

Reggie Ballesteros Just giving you a hard time bro. Lol keep up the good work.

OK you don't like the best fuji lenses 👌

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I guess not lol

@andreak4280

3 жыл бұрын

“the best fuji lenses” are the lenses that get chosen & used by each individual artist for a particular situation at hand ... stats on a lens can be great but if the person using does not derive pleasure or results from said “best lens” then what is the point?? Vision & execution along with contentment of final result far outweighs any ‘stats’ on a lens ... just my .02 and imho of course ! ✌🏼

@Reggiebphoto

3 жыл бұрын

I agree with you 💯