Canon Press

Canon Press

Canon Press is a publishing house located in Moscow, Idaho. Our KZread channel gives a picture of what it means to be a publisher in the 21st century, interviews with our authors, book trailers, satirical videos of ideas that need to be laughed at, robust cultural commentary, podcasts and sermon series, life on the Palouse (one of the most beautiful places in the Pacific Northwest), and much more.

At Canon Press, we create and provide products that sketch a vision of a whole life, full of beauty, tradition, education, community, laughter, and celebration-unashamed of Christ, and sharply at odds with the values of modernity; a mature culture with the church at the center-living out the good life one family at a time.

Visit Us: canonpress.com

Hey, Christian Dad...

Hey, Christian Dad...

No Quarter November 2023

No Quarter November 2023

Пікірлер

  • @christopherlees1134
    @christopherlees113430 минут бұрын

    The kids in the audience are low quality people. Terrible behavior. You can tell they weren't spanked as children.

  • @grantguidroz7640
    @grantguidroz764045 минут бұрын

    Going to enforce OT blasphemy laws? Enforce the sabbath? Idolatry? We don’t have that authority to stone people for these like they did USA and church is not gov of Israel instituted by God under the mosaic covenant

  • @frodej6640
    @frodej664010 сағат бұрын

    When christians point to the existence of satan, satanism and evil. More often the finger goes in the direction of entertainment like hollywood depictions, black metal music, or sub-cultural groups like church of satan, goths, misfits and whatnot. Socialism, leftism, american liberalism, and its variations on the other hand is almost never accused of being satanic. All the time its core values is the destruction of especially christianity, family, community, traditions and culture that is rooted christianity. It doesn't value life or individualism. And today it is clear that facts and truths aren't valued either. The left is very good with words and create messages of compassion. They want healthcare because of the poor and the weak, which resonate with christian values, and then abortion and mutilation suddenly is defined as healthcare. They want freedom from oppression, which resonate with christian values, and then defines family and tradition as oppressive. So people dressing up or acting in stereotypical satanic fashion are merely an distraction, obviously since they are fringe and have little influence. But politicians, political groups, corporate interests using tools from the socialistic toolbox or openly declare themselves as socialists, are never tagged. Am I wrong here?

  • @sshah7513
    @sshah751312 сағат бұрын

    What about the recovering alcoholic

  • @pawlygon929
    @pawlygon92913 сағат бұрын

    You gave no substantial argument that it did not occur in 70AD besides 'be careful, you may leave Christianity if you dig too deep' which yes you're right...I go directly to God now. Like we all can

  • @grantguidroz7640
    @grantguidroz764015 сағат бұрын

    I see Christian nationalism as reactionary to the post modern revolutionaries. Like national fascism to international communism. Their symbol should be a bundle of sticks too👌 😂

  • @grantguidroz7640
    @grantguidroz764017 сағат бұрын

    This is reactionary to the po-mo revolutionaries Like fascism to communism And wasnt the symbol for fascism, a bundle of sticks?

  • @I69CableGuy
    @I69CableGuy17 сағат бұрын

    I am so, so so proud of us. Amen. 🥹❤️‍🔥

  • @christopherjoy2872
    @christopherjoy287217 сағат бұрын

    The ignorance of the older gentleman is saddening. :(

  • @susanbarackman-artist7670
    @susanbarackman-artist767019 сағат бұрын

    Patriarchy-complementarianism teachings are part of the inner workings in many christian churches today. From it have arisen hundreds of rules for women to follow that keeps them in their limited roles of housewife and motherhood and limited education. All those rules are based on a few scriptures that Paul wrote 2000 years ago when addressing the new thing called the church. He directed men and women in their relationship to God and each other and even spoke of sl*very which was legal at the time. it was legal until the 1860s and sl*ve owners used the bible to justify owning sl*ves but completely missed where Paul said they were both equals and to treat one another as brothers. But the fact remained in Roman times that despite both owner and sl*ve being christian, one still owned the other. In fact, Paul never mentioned that the owner should set the sl*ve free. He also never spoke against partriarchy as it was the way the culture was run in the day. Funny how the church abhors slavery but still accepts Roman rule of patriarchy as part of the church today. But what if sl*very were still part of society today? Vased on all the hundreds of rules developed for women to follow as christians, just imagine the list of church rules governing how a master and sl*ve should interact. just like what christianity presents for women today on their relationship with male authority, sermons would be preached and books would be written dealing with issues surrounding the sl*ve/master relationship in a chrisitan setting. the topics might cover....Should a sl*ve ever teach sunday school in which masters might attend? Could a sl*ve be a pastor or deacon or write a book the master might read or hear? Can the master sell the sl*ve? Does the master always have the final say? Can a master decide what the sl*ve wears or what jobs can be assigned to the sl*ve? How should the sl*ve approach the master with a problem? Can the sl*ve disagree with the master? Can master and slave marry? Our modern minds and sensibilities recoil at the very idea of sl*very, even to the point of how I spell the word to keep people and YT from reacting to it-( and the word master has negative connotations today, with master bedroom being changed to primary bedroom) …. Yet we totally ignore or wink at the idea of patriarchy imbedded in and running the church But Paul addressed the problem of both patriarchy and sl*very by simply reiterating what he said in Eph 5--that masters and sl*ve should treat each other as brothers in Christ and all Christians should submit one to another.. Why can’t the modern church use the simple verse of eph 5-21 that we all submit one to another. and leave patrriarchy in the past, where, like sl*very, it belongs and abhor it, just like we do towards sl*very???

  • @yvonne530
    @yvonne53020 сағат бұрын

    Zacharias Papantoniou (Greek: Ζαχαρίας Παπαντωνίου) was a Greek writer. He was born in Karpenissi of Evrytania in February 1877 and died in Athens in 1940. He spent the first years of his life in Granitsa, where his father was a teacher. Apart from a writer, he was also a journalist. Many of the works of Zacharias Papantoniou, unfortunately, are censored because they tell the truth on Greek history. In that censored group is also the book, ''The King Otto''. Below we state a fragment from this book: ''The young Prince for first time come in Athens on January 25, 1833, he hardly heard anyone speak in Greek and so he asked: "Where are the Greeks in Athens?" His court looked at each other and answered: "There are no Greeks, but do not be troubled because this Albanian population will always be faithful to your monarchy."

  • @sudhanshupatra5777
    @sudhanshupatra577722 сағат бұрын

    Is there any promise of God in infant baptism?

  • @jaredherring958
    @jaredherring958Күн бұрын

    As a certified pipe fitter I would just like to suggest a less dumb and unnecessarily complicated way to understand it....... Everyone is capable of sympathy to something/someone they are able to relate to. Empathy is simply a tool to see a situation from a perspective that is foreign and unrelatable to you so that you may be able to sympathize with them. As a simple example imagine you are a dog and how much it must suck to really have to go to the bathroom, but you still have six more hours until your owner gets home to let you out and you really dont want to be beat and have your face shoved into your accident again. If you're able to empathize with that dog it's much easier to show sympathy towards it.

  • @hdubhhdub2020
    @hdubhhdub2020Күн бұрын

    Feminism. And. Leadership. Men. Subservient too. Women

  • @keithwilson6060
    @keithwilson6060Күн бұрын

    The cult of the “Nice Jesus.”

  • @Eshkanama
    @EshkanamaКүн бұрын

    Whelp… I’ve lost a bit of respect for Joey Rogan. Still an incredible minded man. But this is what Satan wants us to do. Not to worship him, not even to be “evil” per se. He wants us to lose faith in God and Christ, and deny His existence. You can be a great and morale person and Satan has no problem with it, as long as you renounce God in your heart.

  • @chrismachin2166
    @chrismachin2166Күн бұрын

    Chesterton believed in a false Gospel. How can you believe in Christ + works? Federal Vision is heretical,and Doug Wilson still believes in this heresy. How James White hasn’t heard Doug Wilson’s heretical views is amazing.

  • @St.MichealTheArkAngel
    @St.MichealTheArkAngelКүн бұрын

    You don’t set anything In nicene boundaries, you believe in the filique. Which is exactly why the Spirit is not actually a person, but a mere expression of “love” or “obedience” between Father and Son.

  • @graceb710
    @graceb7102 күн бұрын

    Good stuff.

  • @BJ-zt7hd
    @BJ-zt7hd2 күн бұрын

    Douglas Wilson should be just as influential as Peterson. I love Peterson but Douglas is far more mature in his views on God and Christianity. One has the spirit the other doesn’t.

  • @vessel4thelordjesus
    @vessel4thelordjesus2 күн бұрын

    The Church may not equip you but the Holy Spirit gives the 9 Fruits of the Spirit including a supernatural peace inside your soul and Christ-like patience and self control and spiritual gifts and callings to do things while walking in His Power that you couldn’t do before.

  • @MichaelTheophilus906
    @MichaelTheophilus9062 күн бұрын

    "Jesus is Yahweh"----James White Pray for this man. He is very deceived.

  • @JoelTenor
    @JoelTenor2 күн бұрын

    Good dialog! Am I the only who would like to see Doug Wilson and Mark Driscoll have a dialog?!

  • @dantemckoy8156
    @dantemckoy81563 күн бұрын

    But I can feel the power of Zeus.

  • @michaelsnow7362
    @michaelsnow73623 күн бұрын

    "The TEXT of this Scripture gives us no grounds for equating the Nephilim with the offspring of fallen angels" textsincontext.wordpress.com/2017/01/24/who-are-the-nephilim-dr-michael-l-brown/

  • @ProvidenceWoodcraft
    @ProvidenceWoodcraft3 күн бұрын

    You know wine is grape juice, right?

  • @janinevanreenen9470
    @janinevanreenen94703 күн бұрын

    Interest of others, in context, is the BODY of Christ. Yes, we must be good neighbors, but our household mustn’t be compromised.

  • @xanderduffy6461
    @xanderduffy64613 күн бұрын

    Find a church with a spine. I’m in Scotland. 😭

  • @Project_mayhem94
    @Project_mayhem944 күн бұрын

    that guy in the middle is an ignorant idiot..

  • @brucemcclelland2069
    @brucemcclelland20694 күн бұрын

    Michael Knowles is religious and in my opinion religious men are no better than woke feminists. Both are useless

  • @nathanlidgett5688
    @nathanlidgett56884 күн бұрын

    You may want to reread Luke 1, Mary & Elisabeth are the Daughters of Aaron Jesus is her son he is of Aaron he is a descended Levi, no Bloodline to David, but a Bloodline to Aaron`s wife Elisheba the Daughter of Amminadah of Judah. ( Exodus 6:23 ) G-D Allaway has a way. ( Hebrews 7:13-14 )= Shabbat Shalom.

  • @davidperman7517
    @davidperman75174 күн бұрын

    Grape juice is free of toxin, kinda seems more reverent.

  • @graydomn
    @graydomn4 күн бұрын

    She has never heard of Mary Jo Kopechne

  • @davidperman7517
    @davidperman75174 күн бұрын

    I’m surprised he took this position. The method of the sacrament isn’t above the purpose. The purpose is to remind us of Christ’s sacrifice, not to ingest a certain amount of alcohol. By Doug’s argument, we could argue over what type of bread to use too 😂

  • @rosagoglia4649
    @rosagoglia46494 күн бұрын

    Sounds good and sound. Thank you.

  • @tatie7604
    @tatie76044 күн бұрын

    NO MORE MOVIES! I'm sick of references to them. Movies themselves are idols.

  • @dannydunn2772
    @dannydunn27724 күн бұрын

    Come on even the heaviest secular death metal bands have slow songs,acoustic songs etc its not all one "tamber" at all

  • @mrniceguy3750
    @mrniceguy37504 күн бұрын

    When did Paul write his letter to Timothy? We should consider why he wrote the letter.. When he wrote the letter. And who he wrote the letter to..

  • @ondreatorrence4322
    @ondreatorrence43224 күн бұрын

    This was a good and balanced messge

  • @user-uf5wt2wb5p
    @user-uf5wt2wb5p4 күн бұрын

    Is Covenant succession the way it’s being taught here even biblical? If covenant succession worked itself out in the manner Doug describes, wouldn’t King David’s children never have strayed from Yahweh? Wouldn’t Solomon’s children never have strayed from Yahweh? Wouldn’t Aaron’s children never have strayed from Yahweh? Wouldn’t Jacob’s children’s children’s children never have strayed from Yahweh to serve Baal and offer child sacrifices to him within only a few generations? If covenantal succession existed in the way Doug describes, Israel as a people could never have strayed from outside the bounds of Jacob’s circumcision and their repeated and recurring apostasies never could have been recorded in the annals of scripture. For an appeal to systematic theology, I fail to see the systematic part. Thus the command to each individual to SEEK Yahweh while he may be found.

  • @deangailwahl8270
    @deangailwahl82704 күн бұрын

    This reminds me of something.....Oh Jan.06....How many years did these poor American soul's be put into prison for doing the same thing by the corrupt Biden government.

  • @marcjanverdelantar9605
    @marcjanverdelantar96054 күн бұрын

    everything this guy said is true. marriage was made for believers, but non-believers romanticized it minus all that comes with it and it became a selfish endeavor for a narcissistic society. and he knows that secular people who wanted to take advantage of marriage for their personal agenda corrupted it for evil spawning blind, confused, and hatred filled, secular people to make it even more than just an abomination.

  • @rosemarylong1735
    @rosemarylong17354 күн бұрын

    I don't appreciate scorn.

  • @Bmwguy2011
    @Bmwguy20114 күн бұрын

    Wait until the Trump Administration begins deporting 25,000,000 illegal “Latinos.”

  • @tatie7604
    @tatie76045 күн бұрын

    OLD JP should go home to his wife or take care of grandchildren. Time to stop his nonsense and shut-up. Because he's a shill, a charlatan. Not even very bright.

  • @taradowell7187
    @taradowell71875 күн бұрын

    Very disappointing

  • @lucianahaingura1128
    @lucianahaingura11285 күн бұрын

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @ReformedSooner24
    @ReformedSooner245 күн бұрын

    Fantastic message. Too many evanjellies HATE messages like this. They cringe at God’s wrath. They’re spoiled by the good times their Christian ancestors built and their works that were blessed. You know who does not only emphasize God’s love and downplay his judgment? Those saints who are persecuted violently in other parts of the world. They sure don’t have the same problem ignoring all the judgement stuff. It brings them comfort knowing that Christ will expand his kingdom and that their enemies will be humbled to repentance OR crushed like dry leaves.

  • @motswelarurii
    @motswelarurii5 күн бұрын

  • @kylekieswether459
    @kylekieswether4595 күн бұрын

    This is what happens when you approach the text of scripture with your own paradigm in hand and force the text to conform to your paradigm. No Doug, what the old covenant "could not get done" was actually affecting salvation. Why? First and foremost, because it did not promise it. And why did it not promise it? Because the old covenants primarily existed to present us with tangible things that foreshadowed intangible/spiritual realities. We understand God dwelling with us because of the tabernacle. We understand Christ's mediatorial work because of the priesthood. We understand his sacrifice on our behalf because of the lamb. "The law was a tutor to bring us to Christ". What Doug's view ultimately does is to make redemptive history more about the individual Christian and his family than about God and His. And that is the new covenant emphasis. Being a child of God through faith, not lineage. The promises we read of in the old testament, and that Doug, however sincerely, misappropriates, are promises to Abraham and his offspring, not to a generalized "believers and their children ''. They are promises, in their initial fulfillment, to national Israel. And those promises to Abraham's offspring then have their ultimate fulfillment in precisely who the new testament authors say they do: In Christ Himself, the singular offspring spoken of in Galatians 3, and those who are in Christ by faith. John 1 does not emphasize that those who received Him were given the right to become children of God through faith, not lineage, in vain. It is only the faith that comes through regeneration that makes us children of God. Not who our parents are. God makes, and keeps, the promises He made to be a God to Abraham's offspring, but the text must tell us who that offspring is. And it does. It is Christ Himself and all those who are in Christ by faith. The promised gift of the Holy Spirit is for those, and only those, who repent and believe. Lineage no longer gives us the title of children of God. Only savingly believing on the name of Christ does that. What then of our children? We raise them in such a way that they might come to repentance and faith and be made children of God as well. And the idea that if our children are not in covenant with God from birth that they must be considered unclean or "treated as pagans" simply has no biblical foundation. The uncleanness that paedo baptists insist must be the logical conclusion of the baptist view that the new covenant is not genealogically oriented simply has no biblical support. Gentiles are no longer to be regarded as unclean, and neither are unbelieving spouses, or the children born from them. There is no possible uncleanness that they can possess. They are simply your children and in need of proper instruction in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. So lead them to Christ, because they need it. Their lineage does not make them children of God. Only believing on the name of the Lord can do that.