Пікірлер

• 
  @martinbrown66523 сағат бұрын

  Many thanks, This appears to make it much easier to design synthesis to us that generally just play the presets as programming is a long learning curve. Will you be making your presets available on the Electra One Forum? Many thanks

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming38 минут бұрын

  Yes. I'll be making them available there with the EaganMatrix presets that go with them placed on our EaganMatrix Patchstorage site.

• 
  @microfx4 күн бұрын

  so can I use that with my Osmose somehow?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming4 күн бұрын

  Not the overlay function yet, but yes the basic note graphing function is in the current 10.09 firmware and you can edit the graphs in the editor to be whatever you like as static graphs. Osmose presets do not use BiqGraphs for note playing but BiqGraphs work fine on Osmose. A few Osmose presets do use graphs to change the harmonic content of the input where you can adjust up to 48 harmonics under program control (the original use for them). You can also use the graphs for create an arbitrary envelope/function generator with any shape you can think of.

• 
  @XeloX584 күн бұрын

  I tried to make patches with the eagan matrix, but it is way to difficult for me. Is this a sort of user interface thing like lets say “vital” ? Cos tbh I don’t know what you are talking about.

• 
  @microfx4 күн бұрын

  @@XeloX58 yeah I have no clue either... I just don't wanna use EagenMatrix at all... this is like Neo reading the Matrix - not everyone is Neo. At least not without tons of training

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming4 күн бұрын

  @@XeloX58 That is the whole point of overlays when they are available for use (they require new firmware not out yet). Overlays will let you twiddle knobs, rotaries, sliders, and buttons to change a preset's configuration. You won't have to deal with changing anything in the EaganMatrix. But for now if you want to do this kind of thing you have to program it in the EaganMatrix.

• 
  @XeloX584 күн бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming Ahh thanks !! I think the eagan is maybe one off the best softsynths, together with falcon, but both are very difficult to manipulate…. I think the eagan with its MPE is so powerfull! I do own a osmose, but I cant make my own sounds. I hope some day the eagan will be available as a AU in logic. And as VST for window users. That would make a lot of peopel happy. And yes, a good interface would be handy !!

• 
  @jojena_imm6 күн бұрын

  Wonderful tutorial for a newbie on this great instrument! 🙏👌🏾

• 
  @dpierresarrat6 күн бұрын

  so could i say , an overlay is like an "module" synthesizer in which i could create different sounds (now here presets) but always in the same overlay, but i also can create for example an additiv synth overlay or anything else overlays ? that sounds fantastic !!!! i never thought that the term POKE comes again in my life , its long ago :)

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming6 күн бұрын

  Exactly! You can poke (basically control) any EaganMatrix static component and also poke formulas to change anything you like about them in real time as well as change all the bank parameters dynamically if you like, etc. that's all separate from all the new macros which is the other way to change things.

• 
  @dpierresarrat6 күн бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming holy .... :)

• 
  @leonnaffin6 күн бұрын

  So will we see the Osmose become a synthesiser programmable from the hardware?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming6 күн бұрын

  It's possible but I have no idea what EE is planning. The Osmose here is just playing the EaganMatrix module that has a preset that the Electra One has total control over. EE could implement a similar controller interface internally for each preset as its own world or they could create a master controller interface to let you treat it as one of maybe five different kinds of synths, etc. But again, I have no idea what their plans are.

• 
  @leonnaffin6 күн бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming this opens up the whole EaganMatix sound engine to musician like me who is not able to program but prefer to have a instrument that is more than a preset player with 6 macros. Don’t get me wrong the Osmose is great. But this could make it much better. Is the EganMatrix module more powerful than the Osmose or do they have the same processing power?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming6 күн бұрын

  @@leonnaffin Yes. That's the whole idea. The Osmose (a 6X DSP model - like original Slim Continuums) has 3x the DSP processing as the EaganMatrix Module and ContinuuMini (2X DSP models).

• 
  @microfx6 күн бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogrammingso Expressive E would need to do this for every one of their presets (exposing/adding overlays) to make it controllable from an external controller?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming6 күн бұрын

  @@microfx They would not want to do that IMHO. But they could create a generic interface that could apply to any preset or new set of presets they create. Like have an Additive set of controls, Subtractive set, Granular set, etc. Or create a separate set of synth engine you can manipulate like Kronos has a few different engines. Etc. There are a world of possibilities. I have no idea what they have planned. The exciting thing is that the community can now create things that will be massively interesting and useful, not just a preset to play.

• 
  @BobbyLachapelleАй бұрын

  Please make the save patch or save user preset user friendly. That is pain in the ahlala! You know, like save as or save button.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  Sorry. I have nothing to do with deciding editor features. Please raise a Haken Audio ticket if you want to propose a new feature as a new editor is in the works (assuming you are talking about the Haken Editor).

• 
  @ghavingaАй бұрын

  This sounds fantastic and will open the EaganMatrix to a whole new audience and possibilities. Two questions, is it already possible to try out the new firmware on the EaganMatrix Eurorack module? And second is the Electra One MK2 worth purchasing especially in preparation for the new EaganMatrix firmware when it is release?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  No. The new firmware is not out yet unless you have an 8x continuum that requires a version later than 10.09 but even in that case there are still things to work out so better to wait until this is formally released. But when released it will run on all EaganMatrix devices that are 2X DSP or more (that includes EMM and ContinuuMini). The Electra One can still be used with the current 10.09 to have all macros and other parameters available on one screen, but there are something perhaps a BeatStep does better right now (Electra does not have push button operation for example - that has to be programmed). So If you have a controller you are using now with EMM, you don't really need an Electra One.

• 
  @johnhurd3257Ай бұрын

  Thanks! You just answered my question.:)

• 
  @johnhurd3257Ай бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @microfxАй бұрын

  The UI/UX is still from hell

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  The point is no one has to use that once the new apps are created that will have knobs and sliders, etc.

• 
  @microfxАй бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming ​​⁠that's great! Maybe show this more clearly 😀 I already own an Osmose - can I use my ElectraOne with Osmose then? Or do I need a computer running this stuff here?

• 
  @pachdeАй бұрын

  @@microfx The new firmware necessary for this isn't generally available yet. When it comes out you will be able to use the Electra One (or another sufficiently flexible midi controller) to control an overlay preset loaded onto the Osmose. You still need a computer and the Haken Editor to create an Overlay. I don't know if it will ship with any overlays out of the box, but we'll see.

• 
  @johnhurd3257Ай бұрын

  ​@@microfx😊

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  @@microfx You can certainly use it with the current 10.09 Midi interface. I just have to confirm the host option works with Osmose so you can connect without a USB Midi Host.

• 
  @valiumdupeupleАй бұрын

  You're fantastic, thx a lot!

• 
  @jaydugger3291Ай бұрын

  Thank you

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  Near the end, 18:48, where you use BiqMode 1, I am completely out my depth, sorry.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  Can I find the test preset 'sinebankcontrol' anywhere?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  Not sure what that is. The only presets available are those you see in your editor. Examples I create for the videos are not available if that is what you are asking.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  At 13:25, adding a '1' to the sF column in the SineBank does nothing for me.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  1 is your default setting that creates the default harmonic spacing. You want to change it from 1 to get different sounds. Put a macro on it to make it change from 0 to 2 as an experiment.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming yes it works, but raises a new conundrum: When I did exactly as you suggested yesterday, the macro didn't make a difference. Yet powering up today, it clearly does exactly as you suggested. I have the impression ( illusion?), that sometimes everything needs a restart for change to take effect. Is this possible?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  @@peterlemer Osmose has many synchronization issues with the editor which I hope they (EE) fix in the upcoming release. Hard to say but possible.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  at 4:48 I see that there's a 'W' column in SineBank 1. On my editor there is simply an upward filled triangle, and placing a '1 in that column doesn't change the balance of sinewaves. How do I match the illustration, please?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  There are new options now - much more involved set of parameters. They are described in the manual and EaganMatrix cookbook I believe. I should create a new SineBank video.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming It appears that the 'R' column in the SineBank 1 does what the 'W' column does in your illustration ( above)

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  @@peterlemer Yes. I just looked it up on the old manual. W is "Weighting of the amplitudes of the sixteen sine wave oscillators in the SineBank. 0 is equal weighting. Values higher than 0 up to 1 favour even harmonics, and values lower than 0 to -1 favor odd harmonics."

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  In the above demo, say 2:39, I can hear Reverb, but the matrix display is extremely simple. I can match the presentation step by step, including audiop. How do I add reverb?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  Read about the recirculator. It is active in most presets unless you turn it off. You can set this on the Osmose as well.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming for the particular sineBank preset I'm editing - I've read, pressed, twisted, slid, inserted, cussed, and have found no way to toggle reverb on/off either within editor or Osmose itself

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  @@peterlemer Osmose global fx setting is the recirculator. Its an option under the Synth button. Same options are in the Recirculator settings in editor - set type, Mix and delay/time (there are a couple other options too that change depending on type). This is separate setting and has nothing to do with the banks.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming yes. Under the Synth/global fx button is 'reverb'. There isn't an ON/OFF option. And in the editor, I see the recirculator settings, but again, no ON/OFF button. In both Osmose and Editor, twiddling with knobs has no effect. Yet in your example, reverb is evident. Is this one of those things that cannot make sense given the time lapse between making the video and today?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  It's always on as its part of the recirculator. But you can turn the mix down to zero which will make it 100% dry.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  You are it set for 8. Set it for something else if you like. This is old video before the extra options were added.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  Where can I set it for something else? Is there somewhere to learn about these extra options?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  @@peterlemer It's in the manual and tool tips in the program.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  Also remember when you see text in red, that normally means there are options to select.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming ah I clicked on '8' many times and go the BB list. Finally clicked just below it and got the option I need = number of sinewaves.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogrammingАй бұрын

  @@peterlemer Almost all red text you see in editor means there are options to select.

• 
  @peterlemerАй бұрын

  At 1:05 I only get 8 sinewaves, not 16.

• 
  @danielimhof36032 ай бұрын

  Hi, I am trying to play the module with Ableton Push 3 via USB Midi, but it seems not to receive any signal. I can play it via TRS Midi, MPE, no problem, but via TRS Midi a few cells from Push 3 do not work, there's no sound. So I wanted to check if this is better via USB Midi, but I can't get it to work in this mode. Am I doing something wrong? I'm in love with this module, btw.. :)

• 
  @danielimhof36032 ай бұрын

  I tried to hook it up directly Push3 -> Module, wich, as mentioned, does not work. When I go over the DAW Push 3-> Ableton DAW MPE-settings -> Module I can play one note wich is audible, but then it goes dead and on the module display it notes the word "loop"... tried other mpe-gear the same way, but it's no problem on other devices, I can play seamless.. all via USB Midi..

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  @@danielimhof3603 You need a USB Midi host to play the module directly over USB. If you don't have a USB Midi host then you can connect Push3 and Module to your computer, bring up the Haken Editor and in Midi and Global Setting for Ext Device 1 select Push3 device and set to Music data filtering. But you still need to send MPE data on channels 2-9 (assuming your preset is set to support max 8MPE channels (some are set for less). Connect a Midi monitor and see what data those Push3 buttons that don't work are sending. You can't play on channels 10-16 for the module. Play on channel 1 for non-MPE else you need to play MPE on channels 2-9 as noted.

• 
  @danielimhof36032 ай бұрын

  thank you so much! 🙏🏼

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  Is this the 3rd in a series? I've just got to the end of the envelopes one and it talks about the next being about presets...?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  If it says Osmose its a newer video. There is no set order other than the first one. This video is of no use to you unless you have an EaganMatrix module.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  I have no real sequence

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming I realised that after I dived in :-) Thanks for confirming.

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming Thank Dawkins! :-) I have rather a lot of links to explore now. I'm hoping I now have all I need.

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  I'm getting no release at 13:21. Where can I send my .mid file for repair?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  Load this and compare with what you did. drive.google.com/file/d/1ABwnTbQAXJ9fBOWMov2RTseSTRtkZBKP/view?usp=sharing

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming Interesting, thanks. In your version, now macro i (labelled Attackspeed) doesn't do anything and macro ii ( release) now controls attack speed :-) I still don't get a release. I'll play with yours and mine a bit longer and see if some neural pathways have settled down :-)

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  @@peterlemer That's because macro controller i is not assigned but release should let you hear a change in attack. Try this one which adds controller i. drive.google.com/file/d/1OHctTcSISScLx1bPyzk7lkA1aDLEJefc/view?usp=sharing

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  And note you don't need controller i to test release. Decreasing shape generator frequency will also create a sustain. The first version I sent you works fine for just testing release.

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming thanks. YOur latest is already under my belt from earlier in the video. I've discovered that my release failed because I had set the 'Merge' on the wrong Formula. Thanks for your patience.

• 
  @pjppostman36932 ай бұрын

  Thank you for all your effort. This is very helpful. I have one question. I tried to follow the user tutorial that comes with the editor. However, when I load the tutorial patch "Simple FM Tutorial.mid" the EaganMatrix disappears and the sound cannot be played from the Osmose. In the Max Console it states: cc109 27 syncFail. Do you know how this can be solved? PS: The Osmose is still connected and changing a preset on the Osmose will load the Osmose preset into the AeganMatrix editor. Also, if I save a preset from the Osmose to disk and load that midi file, everything works fine. So there is something specific in the tutorial file that generates a problem, which is strange, since it is a tutorial file. It should not have anything specific.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  I think there are issues with some versions of that file. Where did you get it? Are you in the Facebook Osmose users group. The file is in the Files section there and works fine.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  And if you don't have access to the Facebook group open up a Haken Audio ticket and someone can email it to you.

• 
  @pjppostman36932 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming Thank you for your swift answer. Unfortunately I am not on facebook, but thanks anyway. I downloaded it with the Haken Editor according to the directions of Expresive EE when I got the Osmose. I feared that these files could only be used with Haken Fingerboards. But if I understand you correctly, that is not the case.😀

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  I think their link is bad. Try here: drive.google.com/file/d/1OuFC5utqkHFQGyfyt7mwoANIL9T5X12H/view?usp=sharing

• 
  @valiumdupeuple2 ай бұрын

  thx a lot!

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  I've got to say, instead of moving from formula edit to edit, you occasionally load a preset without explaining what you've changed, so I'm forced to 'reverse engineer', which in and of itself is quite a powerful coaching tool :-)

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  These videos are meant to present basic concepts, not sequential tutorials.

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  AT 06:50, rich talks about setting sensitivity very light. Is this a figure of speech or is there a sensitivity setting?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  On Osmose there are sensitivity settings. Don't you have an Osmose?

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming Yep, I have an Osmose. When I'm editing a preset in the matrix I don't know what happens when I simultaneously edit the Osmose. Please advise.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  @@peterlemer You can't edit presets on the Osmose for Matrix entries but you can set sensitivity which is totally independent (read the Osmose manual) and not set in editor. You can also set Macro Controller, gain and a few other control settings on the Osmose (or in editor or though Midi CCs). Those may or may not change in editor when changed on the Osmose as there are numerous sync issues with Osmose and editor we've talked about many times on the Facebook site.

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  At 6:00 I'm getting faint ongoing sustain even after reloading the patch. AHA! I see formula B has suddenly appeared at 5:54 .You substituted a preset called something like env.2 and this had both a B formula and B in Ancillary. Sustain has stopped :-)

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  I think the problem at 6:00 is that there's a little bug in the firmware where Y sometimes does not reset to exactly 0 but very close to it. Even though that's a very small number it's enough to have Y create a sustaining tone. This is why it's always best on Osmose if you have a Y+Z formula to scale that by a gated W which will make sure everything goes to zero when lifting your finger and it also makes the formula compatible with Continuum where Y stays at its last position when you lift your finger. Of course sometimes you can't do this if you are using W for some other purpose in that formula, but if W is a shape generator that will default to zero as well normally if you use it as a multiplier on a Y+Z formula (but not always).

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming can you address the other part of my question please? formula B has suddenly appeared at 5:54 after yoiu substituted a preset called something like env.2 and this had both a B formula and B in Ancillary. Where does B live in the Matrix, and why did the Ancillary insertion stop the sustain? Is that all part of your advice ( above) to use W as a gate? If so, why not just place W in the ancillary?

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming thanks for that . Can you say something about my question regarding the B formula: where it lives in the matrix and what it does in the ancillary formula?? Ah, I managed to create formula B by inserting it in the output column, then defining it with W=1, then deleting it from the matrix, then inserting it in the ancillary as you seem to have done. This suggests that there is a practical use of creating off-matrix formulae... It also silences the sustain 🙂 (later) No, it doesn't. Please assist.- pete.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  @@peterlemer B is like C or D, etc. A user defined named formula vs W, X, Y and Z fixed formulas. You only use fixed formulas when the default formula does what you need it to or sometimes I use a named formulas that is the same as a default, but it allows me to change things if I need to.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  @@peterlemer Forget B. That was just something I guess I had in an example but not really the point I was making. Remember that named formulas can be used as Ancillary formulas as well as the default ancillary options.

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  What software are you using to display the envelopes?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  Melda plugins if you mean the overlay display at the end. The Zadar display is the Eurorack module.

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming @ 5:31 illustrating the effects of scaling

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  @@peterlemer Is this a question?

• 
  @peterlemer2 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming yes, I wondered what plugin you were using to illustrate envelope shapes at 05:31 and thereabouts.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming2 ай бұрын

  @@peterlemer A Melda Scope plugin I believe.

• 
  @lizard_3 ай бұрын

  Best intro fr

• 
  @simoninwards72523 ай бұрын

  I am a total newb with the Osmose/Haken Editor & Eagen Matrix. You presented very well, I was able to follow and recreate what you did. Thanks for an excellent introduction, now I just need to practice...

• 
  @JBrm3 ай бұрын

  Thanks for doing these Videos! Just now getting into Eagan Matrix programming with the Osmose. As an analog synth guy, it does bug me a bit, that there is no easy way to just blend between sawtooth, triangle and square waves. Ideally, I'd have a "Virtual Analog Oscillator" with inputs for shape and oscillator drift (to simulate vintage synth behavior). Currently I'm programming all of these manually (using wave banks and blending levels on the filter input), which is quite frustrating for such a seemingly simple task. Also, I'm quickly running out of dsp power and macros. Another thing I do miss is being able to saturate my oscillator waveforms before the filter. I can use the submix for this, but then i also have my effects pre-filter, which is a bit weird... Do you have any special programming tricks up your sleeve specifically for us analog guys? :D

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming3 ай бұрын

  It is its own thing. If you want to mix waveforms like that use something else. There are a million options. Don't try and turn it into an analog modular. Change your mindset for how this works. There are changes in the works to increase formulas, etc. but no release dates yet. Depending on the Spectral balance setting on the OSCs you can get a more triangle vs saw harmonic content (the waveform will not look like a triangle or saw as its DSF). I would try using DFS OSCs at different Spectral Balance settings to see if you get a sound you like which is in effect a mix of different harmonic spectra vs. saw vs triangle, etc. You can do the same with the Jenny OSC which can produce some interesting mixtures. In terms of Wavebanks, you can play with the harmonic weighting to get different mixture like sounds.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming3 ай бұрын

  Also in general you will be a lot better off thinking about how you manipulate harmonic spectra than waveforms as so much of the Matrix is geared for that.

• 
  @JBrm3 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming thank you! The thing is, additive synthesis never really made its way into my thought process. I tried several times throughout my music career, first time was way back when NI Razor came out. And even though I'm comfortable with the frequency domain, harmonics, fourier-tf,... it's just not the way I think about sound. Maybe you're right and the osmose is going to be more of a controller keyboard for me, let's see. I do think the eagan matrix engine is quite powerful, though, and a "simple" VA oscillator could add a lot to the sonic palette.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming3 ай бұрын

  @@JBrm Not just additive synthesis per se. Many of the EaganMatrix components like BiqBank and BigGraph have operations that filter based on harmonic spectra. For example the BiqGraph can let you manipulate individual harmonics of a sound and the BiqBank lets you manipulate spectral peaks and amplitude and frequency spreads, etc. There are at least five different sound generation and filtering techniques used on the EaganMatrix. I rarely use an Oscillosope to look at EaganMatrix sounds, but I use a spectrum analyzer all the time. For example if you look at one of the OSCs that you set to a saw-like wound, it will not look anything like a sawtooth wave, thought it will have a similar harmonic content of it. Only the Wavebanks will look like waveforms you are used to.

• 
  @kevindewinter82354 ай бұрын

  Hi, How can i do this with my EAGANMATRIX module and ableton? THx :)

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming4 ай бұрын

  There is no arpeggiator on the EaganMatrix module. It is Osmose specific. You play the module over MPE on channels 2-9 or standard Midi on channel 1, so Midi clock has no meaning. The module will play notes at whatever speed Ableton sends them. The one thing you can do in the matrix is sync EaganMatrix Shape Generators to an external Midi Clock. You can find that in the manual and there's a video somewhere here that addresses that.

• 
  @kevindewinter82354 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming So this is from modulargrid "This versatile module can act as a sound source, a sound processor, a CV source (via connection to an external Control Voltage Converter), a Midi source, or a customizable combination of all these capabilities" is it possible to use it as a cv to midi converter? i don't really mind but since its great as is but if in modular it can be a clock or cv to midi device that would be a bonus!

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming4 ай бұрын

  @@kevindewinter8235 It can function as a CV to Midi converter. If you play over CV, the monophonic output will be by default sent out Midi TRS and USB ports cycling MPE channels. Set MPE priority to low to output on channel 2 only. Take your module out of MPE mode in I/O settings by setting Z=CC11 for example and then your Midi monophonic output will be on channel 1. I would set dynamic velocity as well there or output will use a constant velocity=127.

• 
  @bramdevries60754 ай бұрын

  Thank you, this was exactly the kind of intro I needed!

• 
  @peterlemer5 ай бұрын

  When I try to save the preset, I am asked to pay for a max subscription, but I saw previously that Osmose owners needn't pay for Max. Please advise?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming5 ай бұрын

  You don't have to pay to just use the demo version for editor only use. I assume you are saving the preset in the editor not trying to save something in MAX itself. You have to pay to try and create and save MAX programs in MAX.

• 
  @peterlemer5 ай бұрын

  How do I create a new preset from scratch - ie. no sound at all?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming5 ай бұрын

  Start with the empty preset.

• 
  @mrmikis5 ай бұрын

  Great tutorial. Horrible patch as an example. I would like to see more of this kind of content used with more musical sounds. Thanks.

• 
  @mehmetcemtuncer6 ай бұрын

  Amazing work !

• 
  @maximustot84416 ай бұрын

  Having understood 20% of the capabilities of the matrix, I don’t understand why most people prefer to buy another “magic” module that will do all the work for them) this is a brilliant creation containing everything that humanity has come up with in sound synthesis over several decades! thank you so much for this!

• 
  @ervinpoljak83327 ай бұрын

  Thank you for your explanations and tutorials. Waiting for my Osmose to arrive, so watching your videos is somewhat of perfect preparation for a noob like me ;)

• 
  @barbaraweiss95277 ай бұрын

  Just what I needed! Thanks. 🤗

• 
  @makeperceive7 ай бұрын

  Thank you, you're a great teacher

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming7 ай бұрын

  Thanks. I guess my years teaching in college a long time ago paid off.

• 
  @agusr328 ай бұрын

  Very nice series of videos! Do these tutorials also apply to the Osmose Expressive E?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming8 ай бұрын

  Yes. The Osmose EaganMatrix Sound engine is identical to a 6x Continuum though there are differences in how Z and Y are treated on Osmose so I have a few Osmose specific videos that explain differences in programming vs. Continuum. But the basic sound engine components and programming of them are otherwise identical. There are also differences in rounding and a few other editor functions that the Osmose does not support as it has on board configuration for a number of things that are different from continuum operation.

• 
  @agusr328 ай бұрын

  @@eaganmatrixprogramming that's great, thank you!

• 
  @periklisliakakis20498 ай бұрын

  What an amazing tutorial series. Thank you so much

• 
  @lukeh55219 ай бұрын

  sup ece 402 gang

• 
  @nigelh29 ай бұрын

  Shame, it's only coming out on the left channel.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming9 ай бұрын

  Coming out both for me, but seems left channel is louder. Oh well. I'll check things next time. Thanks.

• 
  @CharlesFerraro9 ай бұрын

  Would be great for organ programming

• 
  @seanmagner763710 ай бұрын

  Around 7:30 you forgot to add that you were assigning the w to macro controller i at this step. This had me rewinding, trying to follow it for some time before I realised what you had done. Also your secondary setting doesn't seem to have been assigned to the macro controller i. Is this correct?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming10 ай бұрын

  Oops. Yea I should see if I can add a note there. Looks like I did not mention Macro controller i. The secondary is set to ii for release. Primary and secondary always set to the same controller once selected.

• 
  @seanmagner763710 ай бұрын

  Thanks for the reply. Is there a way to automatically copy the values from primary to secondary with the editor or is it a manual process?

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming10 ай бұрын

  @@seanmagner7637 You have to manually set the parts that don't automatically carry over between primary and secondary.

• 
  @ConstantinPhillipou10 ай бұрын

  Amazing video! So close to the cs80. Hopefully one day this will sound as analog as the cs

• 
  @ConstantinPhillipou10 ай бұрын

  Important: I noticed at 21.35, the video was cut off and resumed with something changed behind the scenes, no idea what (on top of a small change that you can see W was 0.05 before and now 0.061). Problem is that when I continue your tutorial from then on and adjust the C Formula with Y setting instructions you give and then press the Osmose keys on my synth to hear back the result (like you do at 22.00), the result of the sound is not the same on my side. The aftertouch Y takes my sound from one pitch to another. Do you remember if you changed something else at that cut off part in the video? Thank you.

• 
  @ConstantinPhillipou10 ай бұрын

  I found the issue: I see you quickly changed the scaling of C to a multiplier at 21.45 - quick subtle change.

• 
  @eaganmatrixprogramming10 ай бұрын

  Yes I simply adjusted the width of the vibrato a slight bit. This doesn't change the basic sound in any other way

• 
  @ConstantinPhillipou10 ай бұрын

  5 star video

• 
  @pedroeustache551110 ай бұрын

  Thanks so much Richard!! Your videos are GOLD!! As a newcomer to the EaganMatrix --I'm a wind synthesist playing an EaganMatrix Eurorack module--- your videos are of HUGE help! Thank you! God bless you!!