- Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship and a three day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.

@DK-ig8zi

3 жыл бұрын

Can you make the bests Russian tanks (T90AM, T72B3 2016,T14 Armata) vs the bests tanks for China?

@lamalien2276

3 жыл бұрын

Awesome video! More like this please!

@constantiniasmith4231

3 жыл бұрын

Why in the add those player can run on openfield and barelly getting spotted or hit?

@matthewadams-richardson6980

3 жыл бұрын

Any way you can get deals for subscribers who are already War Thunder players? I know WOT and War Thunder are always drumming for new players but a lot of people already are players and follow your channel closely because they have a genuine interest in Tanks. Not sure I can say the same about people who are not already War Thunder players.

@dexterlibson8442

3 жыл бұрын

Im vote russian tank

When you get uptiered.........

@deathtrooper199

3 жыл бұрын

I feel your pain

@MrOist

3 жыл бұрын

Every. Single. Time

@peoplesrepublicofliberland5606

3 жыл бұрын

Cries in Tiger 1 at 6.7

@andyc3230

3 жыл бұрын

ironically in-game T72AV has a slightly higher BR than the Type96, which is the successor to the Type85.

@oLevLovesLove

3 жыл бұрын

Uptiered vs the Chinese premium squad.

>their crew was trained up to ukrainian standards I dont think you want crews trained to 2005 ukraine standards

@lucysky1199

3 жыл бұрын

Better subpar training than none at all I guess?

@IowanLawman

3 жыл бұрын

@@lucysky1199 Its comparing a shit and a shit sandwich. Both are bad options.

@massimechoub3343

3 жыл бұрын

Ukraine was a soviet nation so it was not catastrophic at all...

@henryatkinson1479

3 жыл бұрын

@@massimechoub3343 this was 15 years post soviet, and they had no money

@londonberry2180

3 жыл бұрын

Considering they did manage to gain initial victories, I don't think the South Sudanese crew were "that" bad

S. Sudan didn't have enough RP or SL to research 3BM22 or 3BM29. Probably got cocky about the Type 55's and thought they could treat a new upgrade the same way. Seems more like a training problem then it is an equipment one.

@rollingthunder6215

3 жыл бұрын

yes yeess!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@thetigerii9506

3 жыл бұрын

s sudan didnt buy the ru251 on sale and now has to take a fat L grinding SL without a premium

@mohamedelmalih6298

3 жыл бұрын

As a sudanese i approve to that xD

@deadliftalot

3 жыл бұрын

they forgot to buy the t55am1 on sale xD

@bickboose9364

3 жыл бұрын

all the noobs had to do was use the map effectively and shoot the LFP on those Chinese tanks but no they finally finish research on a new MBT and they head out like headless chickens

in addition to the fact that T72A is an older model , it also was not new tanks taken from the reserve , how long they served before and how long they later stood in storage , considering that Ukraineit never made this type it is not clear how repair was made and it is difficult to say in what condition they were passed especially for barrel wear .

@underhorse5367

3 жыл бұрын

T85 also is a older model

@nabara6949

3 жыл бұрын

@B J Yes, type 85 is also old. But compared to T72, as he said, it's more than a decade newer.

@11vdv11

2 жыл бұрын

@B J Ukrainian can’t produce t72. They sold tanks that were close to end of its life already. Basically very heavily used vehicles. Overall type 85 is way far forward from t72av

I really want to see red effect playing war thunder

@smogdanoff7053

3 жыл бұрын

He wouldn’t be able to handle it psychologically And by that i mean the fuckery of Gaijioobles and the game mechanics

@triatheraider1612

3 жыл бұрын

@@smogdanoff7053 yea war thunder is kinda triggering sometimes

@_hoaxx

3 жыл бұрын

@@triatheraider1612 Kinda??? More like "almost every time"

@bouteilledeau1463

3 жыл бұрын

@@_hoaxx Yes. Might be because I'm a noob, constantly dying because every 1st shell I recieve kills my gunner feels infuriating.

@mahogany7712

3 жыл бұрын

Stick to ww2 vehicles, moving on is only pain. SPECIALLY WW2 VEHICLES FACING MODERN HEAT ROUNDS.

Last time I was this early, RedEffect and Alpha defence were still having a feud.

@jacobjohnson2603

3 жыл бұрын

Blue Effect lmao

@ignorantethan656

3 жыл бұрын

@@avid459 Alpha Defence =/= Alpha Defense

@dimes7742

3 жыл бұрын

@@ignorantethan656 what?

@vandansonkar7819

3 жыл бұрын

@@dimes7742 alpha defense idiot created a channel to personally attack red effect, i'm sure red doesn't give a fuck

@docrex1678

3 жыл бұрын

Both of them need to get a real job and a life

My mans maybe a video on the TRUE worst Nato tank. The Tr-85M1 from Romania

@slavarodu5062

3 жыл бұрын

The worst? Laughs in ariete xD

@Brother_Nihilus

3 жыл бұрын

@@slavarodu5062 yes, the worst. I mean protection is obsolete. Firepower is horrendous. Mobility is shit, fuel consumption is bad. Availability is laughable, if I'm not mistaken no thermal or panoramic sight

@Brother_Nihilus

3 жыл бұрын

@Drayn 99 if you can tell me the designations. Like T-72 ural, T-72A, T-72M/M1 T-72B. Then I can tell you. They are most likely M's or M1's which aren't that good. A tank from the 70' to 80' is pretty much obsolete.

@jetkwan6707

3 жыл бұрын

Worst NATO MBT, maybe. Still one of the top performing T-55 variants around tho, along with that one cursed Ukrainian attempt to shoehorn T-80U parts into a T-55A.

@Brother_Nihilus

3 жыл бұрын

@Drayn 99 ok so basically imagine a m1 with possibly better mobility and FCS(fire control system) I believe that it has a better rangefinder. Other than that I'm oblivious to the m2 variant :/

1:59 lmao look at Crimea

@pawEHO

3 жыл бұрын

He forgot about Donetsk and Lugansk republics

@Abanamat85

3 жыл бұрын

​@@pawEHO its not the same, thats more of a Transnistrian-type frozen conflict, unrecognized even by Russia itself.

@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385

3 жыл бұрын

¯\_( ツ)_/¯

@telurkucing5006

3 жыл бұрын

He dont want to get burned by angry ukrop or russian, better make that weird statement to make it neutral

@HanSolo__

3 жыл бұрын

As much as Crimea was always in Russian (waaay before Soviets) borders and should stay Russian land this looked like Russia got so weak influence out there all-around so that they had to use the military argument. While they were the ones that gave Crimea to Ukraine. Weak move - acting like an ass. Donetsk and Lugansk - Jesusless, what they were thinking about? Seriously? The whole Ukraine got beaten by two its regions and Putin says: "What? When? 2 days ago? Are they really fighting for their independence? Interesting, who knew huh?" - and this piece of horse shit went off into the air as official Russian govs statement XD And this Specnaz guy - "We are from Russia and we fight with Ukraine. Locals don't give two fucks anymore. They want peace and they say both sides act unmatured way." Wester press - "O reely?!"

Little story, South Sudanese Civil War also know as test grand for "which shcoll is better" for PLA Command Academy. Joint Operations College of the National Defense University VS National Defense University, Shi Jia Zhuang VS Bei Jing. We are really interested in the results.

@Hakasnakeman212

3 жыл бұрын

You have any reports we can also read ?

@lolasdm6959

3 жыл бұрын

@@Hakasnakeman212 If you can read Chinese

@user-ic8dk5sg5b

2 жыл бұрын

@@Hakasnakeman212 We trained officers and soldiers on both sides of them

Type 99 would be nice to see in the future

@zhaviator

3 жыл бұрын

They wouldn t export it anytime soon

@andyc3230

3 жыл бұрын

@@zhaviator I think he is referring to the game.

@zhaviator

3 жыл бұрын

@ғєαʀʟєss. exe well... VT4 is an upgraded MBT2000 with some tech from type 99, and MBT2000 itself is developed from the type 90. They are connected for sure, but I wouldn't say that VT4 is the export version of type 99

@thekaiseroftheeast3895

3 жыл бұрын

@ғєαʀʟєss. exe Kek, look whose here. But I can't blame you, I'm a War Thunder fan myself.

@badgermcbadger1968

3 жыл бұрын

@ғєαʀʟєss. exe they added the ztz 99 to wt and it isnt that strong, its not even on the highest br

Excellent video, great information, thanks for your time and work

Hi, your videos are so well made and presented. Well done and keep up the great work :)

I’m waiting for VT-4 MBT video

@zszs100

3 жыл бұрын

Thatd be awsome.

@shanewatson2670

3 жыл бұрын

Hunter6213 yes that’s right, 1500 Hp And 300 in number

@arhumzia6360

3 жыл бұрын

@@shanewatson2670 and fy4 armour

I’ve always been a fan of the T-72s, T-80s and T-90s because of their looks and also how agile they are.

@sini0071

11 ай бұрын

Reverse speed lmao

@FPK___

10 ай бұрын

@@sini0071 it is agile for the time way faster than the M60 and the T95E1, also its much smaller and harder to hit

On tank to tank engagement, One has to consider the experience and skills of the crew, the stratedy employed and the available technology present.

Any possibility you'd do more ifv videos in the near future like warrior, bradley etc. I really enjoyed the previous ifv vids

This is why T-34 tanks perform better ingame than historically due to mouse aim and gameplay UI, equalising tank crew training and optics amongst its opponents. Once you have better fire control and situational awareness, it makes a big difference.

@joshjonson2368

Жыл бұрын

Not to mention Stalinium which magically works ingame while historically they tend to crack

@ravenouself4181

24 күн бұрын

It also helps that Germany Mains are braindead 90% of the time

@ravenouself4181

24 күн бұрын

@@joshjonson2368 Honestly? The T-34 is not as insufferable as the Cast Hull Sherman or the Panzer IV. The former being able to bounce shots from Tiger I's and Panthers like it's the IRS when asked to explain it's budget usage and the latter being able to shatter shells that touch it's armor.

Never heard of this before. Thanks for the video 🙏

"trained to Ukrainian standards" kinda laughed

@puffypegion7815

3 жыл бұрын

Arthur Morgan cause Ukraine’s army standards are kinda shit tbh with you

@texx1985

3 жыл бұрын

@@puffypegion7815 how do you know?

@puffypegion7815

3 жыл бұрын

texx1985 look at their military and all the things they have done since the collapse of the Soviet Union

@puffypegion7815

3 жыл бұрын

texx1985 not that I hate Ukraine or anything

@puffypegion7815

3 жыл бұрын

texx1985 because their military was disorganized and horrible back in 2005

Love this video can we see more about battles such as this

Americans: sold arms to both the Brits and Nazis and made a lot of money. Chinese: sold arms to both Sudan and South Sudan and made a lot of money. Americans: my young padawan has learned well from the dark side.

@yuluoxianjun

2 жыл бұрын

China learn everyone

I dont know , The looks of Kontakt-1 on the Tanks is just ... magnificent , love them ! (T-72AV/B T-80BV and T-64BV) :) Again perfect video , RedEdfect :)

Thank you very much for the video, I've always wanted to know something about tanks on both sides of Sudan's civil war.

Very well done. Thank you.

Bro,do the TR-85 M1 next

@Berbecu69

3 жыл бұрын

You are from romania no?

@Yuri_Bodlovic

3 жыл бұрын

trash can

@Jump-Shack

3 жыл бұрын

They also have the TR 125 aswell

@Yuri_Bodlovic

3 жыл бұрын

@@Jump-Shack copy of t72?

@Jump-Shack

3 жыл бұрын

Yep

You often mention T-55 and Type 69 etc in your videos.. Could you make a video on these and the main variants which were the best and how they performed?

@longyu9336

3 жыл бұрын

Nice

Nice reviews and I just subbed too.

Pakistan just bought 300 VT-4 from China. Pakistan VT-4s also have better configurations than Thailand version, such as FY4. Would be an interesting topic in my opinion.

@shermanfirefly5410

3 жыл бұрын

Yup, the Pakistans' Vt4s also came with new rounds that brings higher penetration

well there's a reason T-72s are dirt cheap

@lordgrey3749

3 жыл бұрын

No they are not

@Mandrak789

3 жыл бұрын

@@lordgrey3749 sure they are, 150-250k euros is peanuts for a main battle tank; ex-USSR countries including Russia may even give few dozens for free if you pay for refurbishment and transport.

@lordgrey3749

3 жыл бұрын

@@Mandrak789 no t72 cost 200k euro let alone 150k

@TheIdiotPlays

3 жыл бұрын

@@lordgrey3749 Even a civilian can buy them for that money. Although disabled (i dont remember if it is done before or after you receive the tank, depends on your countrys laws I quess.)

@TheIdiotPlays

3 жыл бұрын

Welp I've seen some for cheaper, but this one is in pristine condition. mortarinvestments.eu/catalog/onStock/like-new-t-72

Can you either review the Al zarrar or the VT4?

@zszs100

3 жыл бұрын

VT4 and its associated series please!

I bet Ukraine wished it didn’t sell those T-72AVs it had now.

@mbtenjoyer9487

Жыл бұрын

Well they couldn’t keep every single tank they have from USSR so they had to sell some ( maybe they sold too many )

@HeavenlyMandate

Жыл бұрын

​@@mbtenjoyer9487 nah they can turn the non-operable ones into spare parts

Hello i am trying to find some info on the scope reticle for the ZTZ-96 but i can't find anything, could you help me with that? trying to add the custom sight into WT :b

If we need entertaining i suggest do Type 59D1 (Chinese) vs Arjun

@lolasdm6959

3 жыл бұрын

T-34(Chinese variant) VS Arjun?

@radjaaddakhiel2755

3 жыл бұрын

@@lolasdm6959 sherman would be more apple to apple

hey, ive finally found ur channel again

Wow, I'm early! Also, what did China do to make Russia angry, eh? Just Kidding.

@Alamdar-

3 жыл бұрын

Faqers

@arbeiterz8491

3 жыл бұрын

China didn't support Soviet sovereignty in East Europe and Warsaw Pact, meanwhile collaborated with France

@werrkowalski2985

3 жыл бұрын

Mao thought he was the ideological successor to Stalin.

@tk9060

3 жыл бұрын

Russia forgot that it was one of the Eight Nation Alliance countries that wanted to calve up China, and raped Northern China as well. But past is past and the current relationship is good

@arbeiterz8491

3 жыл бұрын

@@werrkowalski2985 In which case he is if you go ask the Polish

I sexually identify as a main battle tank

@mr.waffentrager4400

3 жыл бұрын

Me as tank destroyer...

@davidegazzaniga7558

3 жыл бұрын

I’m a 185mm demolition charge projector !

@imwatchingthisvideo7023

3 жыл бұрын

I am a strong independent black Abrams who don't need no infantry support.

@kmagentbolo

3 жыл бұрын

I’m a dying breed of medium tanks

@unreal4273

3 жыл бұрын

They call me Ballistic missile

hi Readeffect, would u like to make a episode about tank biathlon?

@timothy1949

3 жыл бұрын

yes thats wt i was asking too in the previous video

@defencebangladesh4068

3 жыл бұрын

yes

Thank you for the research. In WW2 it happened that "inferior" tanks could take out a larger number of "superior" tanks. Simply by a tacticaly outmaneuvering of the enemy, superiour battlefield awarness by one side, Ambush, better crew, ..... The T72 was built as a easy to mass-produce cheap tank. It was not ment to be the best of the best of Soviet engineering .

@shermanfirefly5410

3 жыл бұрын

The best of the best at that era would be the T64s

@philippe8160

3 жыл бұрын

@@shermanfirefly5410 I think the T64 was ment as a high end tank for elite troops. The T72 was ment more like the T54/55 or T34. A simple easy to mass produce tank.

@russkatherealoriginal6904

Жыл бұрын

Ironically, the T-72 became superior to the T-64 thanks to constant upgrades.

Whenever Russian weapons are defeated , it's definitely not the vehicle's fault. It's either "downgraded" version or crew went for "lunch " or crew is not properly 'trained" . They will never accept that the said weapon is thoroughly inferior . Case and point : recent pantsir in Syria

@sengwesetogile6054

2 жыл бұрын

Funnily enough, when the abrams performed poorly in saudi use, it was blamed on the export abrams not having depleted uranium armor like the US ones.

@aravindc102

2 жыл бұрын

@@sengwesetogile6054 but with Russian equipment, it fails even when Russians were using it . It's not like that with US equipment

@marcusott2973

2 жыл бұрын

@@sengwesetogile6054 there's no uranium in any M1's armor, Chobham armor is a sandwich out of steel, ceramic and composite.

3:51 you can see a dent on the right (our left) side turret cheek

Hiya with mounting tension between India and China is it possible for you to make a vid comparing both their MBTs? I heard that some of their tanks cannot be used if war were to break out due to the terrain and height. Thanks

@shermanfirefly5410

3 жыл бұрын

I think that's why they built type15 LOL

i would also like to note that the south sudenese are more tribal minded, meaning that there were a lot of rivalries within their ranks, which is pretty much why, with the common enemy (the arab northerners) out of the picture, they started infighting again, mostly over natural resources and government controll itself

@treyebillups8602

3 жыл бұрын

hell the entire reason they split off from sudan was because the sudanese government were arab muslims and south sudan was mostly nilotic and either christian or following traditional faiths

@mhmdsuliman473

Жыл бұрын

@@treyebillups8602 Nope that’s the excuse for not Muslims..it’s always the natural resource and the western support that south to get the resources

Since you also do IFVs, when are you gonna do the LAV family of 8x8? :3

Hey Redeffect, can you make a video about the type 99 and type 99a?

@kevinkuang2292

3 жыл бұрын

he made one already about....... a year ago?

@enter_username1312

3 жыл бұрын

@@kevinkuang2292 He did but it wasn't in great detail, it was only a little bit about every chinese tank

@zszs100

3 жыл бұрын

@@enter_username1312 He said a lot of information is classified and not available. Since its their latest tank a lot of information is not released.

@zszs100

3 жыл бұрын

@098765 Craper Yup.

@enter_username1312

3 жыл бұрын

Dang that's unfortunate

"'their crew was trained up to ukrainian standards" - well there's your problem

"1930's to 1990's" *gaijin be like* LETS ADD A 2010 TANK

According to what I heard people talking, it is quite normal, *for a Western military to look down Asian one* , unless that Asian nation is aligned with Western interest. They think that there is no way Asian military and Asian produced weaponry is equal or superior compare to Western one. *Until the Imperial Japanese military and Chinese People Volunteer Army prove otherwise that yes, they can stand up against Western military.*

Hey redeffect can you do a video about the Australian Abrams thanks and show how obsolete they are

good video

More of this!

can you make a video on the Type-15 light tank?

@oscarl2334

3 жыл бұрын

已经出了

One thing you completely leave out is that the south Sudanese army bought A handful of early production model T 72s due to the fact that most of the army your ex rebels and have no training in armored warfare other than using highly mechanized technicals with ZPU guns. Also given the fact the Sudan has a long military relationship with the Chinese bus as a result many of the tankers have higher experience operating heavy armor compared to the south Sudanese who are mostly skilled and guerrilla warfare many of the south Sudanese soldiers were able to knock out Chinese made tanks through the same guerrilla tactics that help them defeat the Sudanese state during their 30 to 40 year guerrilla war

@yuluoxianjun

2 жыл бұрын

@B J wow,that is a win-win

That is very technical analysis. War is a lot more complex than comparing which vehicle is better in a vacuum. Neither those capabilities which you had mentioned are of any use. Thermal imaging, fire control systems. These things are useless outside of specific types of engagements. What matters is how you employ said tank. In war, there were many aces who had performed far better than your average commander. Yet, we do not value performance of a vehicle based on performance of a commander. Nor we consider a Sherman tank to be superior machine just because it decimated German armor during one several battles during WW2.

>Ukrainian standards >Ukrainian army which was surrounded 7 times during active war phase in Donbass

@tusk9132

3 жыл бұрын

It happened twice and they got surrounded by the Russian army which invaded Ukraine from Russian territory. I am not Ukrainian tho, but I always stand with the truth.

@JASHVEER22

3 жыл бұрын

Ultimately ukraine belarus and kazakstan will return to Russia.

@tusk9132

3 жыл бұрын

@@JASHVEER22 learn some basic history and you will know that these countries were never Russia.

@kastelukannumollom5289

3 жыл бұрын

@@tusk9132 Russian empire???

@tusk9132

3 жыл бұрын

@@kastelukannumollom5289 so they were part of the empire but that doesn't make them russian. By your name I suppose that you're from Finland, which used to be a part of the empire, does that make you russian now? :)

Ammunition budgetary expenditure is a critical factor with Mbts I feel. If you go cheap & buy older munitions then you have handicapped your offensive performances.

Make a video on indian t72 ajeya tanks which are operated in large numbers. Ur comparisons and analysis are quite good

hey could you do a video on the M1A2C and your opinions it?

Type96 = M1A1 at gulf war sounds reasonable, considering Type 96 went into service many years after the gulf war.

Please Do A Video On Type 62 Light Tank Plz

Can you do a video on the new M1A2C sep v3?

What ammo were either side using?

Would Love to see these battles in Cgi

Why did you show the interwar USSR map when talking about late USSR?

Can u make a video on the MGCS

we are already in year 2016 with vehicles in WarThunder ' - '

How about tactics? Or who saw who first?

Please make a video about TR-85M1

Yo my bro @redeffect.. Would you please to review Indonesian medium tank harimau hitam/kaplan. Thanks

Quick question, theres nothing out there to stop an apfsds round. A trophy system only works for rockets?

@shermanfirefly5410

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, the trophy system is not powerful enough to take out kinetic rounds

In training we shoot our old Leopard ones. They still use tanks from that age. Wow

@mangoknight5035

3 жыл бұрын

Give us the Old Leopard 1s , dont shoot them 😪😪

Can you compare Russian mbt to Chinese mbt Ztz99a vs t14 armata

@stilpa1

3 жыл бұрын

LOL, even T-72B3 is better than that

@ke._njil.o.h2458

3 жыл бұрын

@@stilpa1 WTF man have your brain haywire or....?

@tk9060

3 жыл бұрын

@@stilpa1 that was type 96 vs t72b3

Now can you do a comparison of Leopard 2A5, 2A6 and 2A7? thanks

It’s not surprise at all. Basically T-72AB it’s just T-72 with K1 era. Type 85 more comparable to T-72Б or more modern versions

They are actually the same generation of tanks. T-72 entered service in 1979, while Type-85 entered service in 1980. But you are right the one knocked out are not upgraded like the Chinese tanks.

@matthiuskoenig3378

3 жыл бұрын

what source did you use? NORINCO officially announced the orginal Type 85 in 1989 (claiming to have started its development in 1985), and the PLA claimed to have trialed the vehicles later that year. the Type 85-IIM supposedly came into service in 1991 (and was announced in 1992) so yeah the Type-85-IIM is more than a decade older than the T-72A perhaps you were confused, the Type 80 is supposed to have entered service in 1981.

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

and also, wtf? T-72 entered service in 1979?

@mottscottison6943

3 жыл бұрын

@@Kalashnikov413 T-72A. T72B is 1985.

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

@@mottscottison6943 should've said the model from the fucking beginning

Just saying, the map of USSR you used around 2:18 is a pre-WW2 map of USSR, where you can see that the Western part of Belarus and Ukraine was still under Polish administration.

When you are at tier 8 but you went to a battle with tier 9's and 10's

You should do M1A2 SEP V3 Abrams vs Challenger 2

Great video I never knew the t72 went against chinese tanks.

Had a few questions and I'm hoping you can answer it: Is it possible to upgrade a t-72 b3 to t90-M standards? if so, why wouldn't Russia do that as it might be more cost-effective? Also, how much would such an upgrade cost?

@degenerat3380

2 жыл бұрын

It would cost practically the same and we still would get a worse tank

There's rekt T62 in Beijing military museum which china capture in a border dispute, along with the shot down U2 recon plane reckt from the US in Serbia

@babani8418

3 жыл бұрын

@098765 Craper maybe, it should be shot down during kosov war in the 90s

what take out the Type 85 IIIm ? an ATGM or a T-72AV ?

@zhuravl-m2285

3 жыл бұрын

Other Sudanese rebels took it out. Not destroyed (I have proof if you need it) but was captured, crew abandoned after they were ambushed

What you think about t54M?

Can you make a video about how merkava mk1 proved effective against t72 in 1982

Red can you make a video on China light tanks?!?

its totally depends on the crew training not much on the tank ( t -72 and type 85 II) estimating victory over the tank type is some thing wrong u cannot predict which tank would win or not e.g in the strong european tank challenge austrias 1990s leopard 2A5 takes the leads against m1a2 , leopard 2A7 and other nations tanks bcz of better performance and precise shots ... its depend how u use ur strategy and the tank in the better persepective

@werrkowalski2985

3 жыл бұрын

Dude, do you seriously think T-72A is anything but obsolete compared to type 85 II?

So who won wins modern t-72 or modern xing tank ?

How tf do you manage to lose a tank? "Oopsies i forgot where I put it"

So please a video on t72b3 vs type 96b

@thegreatkhan9663

3 жыл бұрын

I think he already did one

0:15 Wow I didn’t know that

Stalinium vs maolinium

Make a video on vt 4 tanks

Second ... because red effect first .

@gottmituns9652

3 жыл бұрын

Shit u got a point

Hello red effect. Please make a video on Bangladesh military MBT2000, type59 DURJOY, and type 69s. You have a large number of viewers from Bangladesh and we would love you to make a video on our tanks. Thank you :)

@rocky9609

3 жыл бұрын

no one cares

All tanks are 'obsolete' and 'wurst' tanks in the 'wurrld'. Still waiting for Red Effects' best tank in the wurrld prototype to be rolled out!

early question: where's RedEffect from?

@radonsider9692

3 жыл бұрын

Serbia or Slovenia i think

@corvuscorax8459

3 жыл бұрын

I believe he is Serbian.

@randomthot125

3 жыл бұрын

@Arpan Abinaswar I thought he's from the holy roman empire.

@arbeiterz8491

3 жыл бұрын

@Arpan Abinaswar It's a fact that modern Chinese tanks are designed to meet higher standards than their Russian counterparts, so it's no surprising to lean towards Chinese tanks.

@arbeiterz8491

3 жыл бұрын

@Arpan Abinaswar Youve just made so many mistakes in ur statement

4:48 that a 6 wheel off-road vehicle?! What's that?

Pleas make a video on vt4 tank

When you are going to make a video for Al Khalid1?

@8000jk

3 жыл бұрын

He made two videos on the Al Khalid, one was a comparison with the Arjun and the other was a video on problems with the Al Khalid tank.

@halarkhan4257

3 жыл бұрын

@@8000jk I am talking about New Al- Khalid named AL-KHALID 1, it has been shown a month ago.

@8000jk

3 жыл бұрын

@@halarkhan4257 From what I read this seems like a promising tank.

@halarkhan4257

3 жыл бұрын

@@8000jk It's new but red effect will tell us better

@paulzheng5327

3 жыл бұрын

@@halarkhan4257 probably not for a long time because he has to do research ! But best of luck from China 🇨🇳

M-91 Vihor?