I think Chapek was given a dumpster fire of a situation only so Bob Iger could swoop in and look like the hero, even thought the majority of the issues Disney has faced are his fault. Michael Eisner did the same thing back in the 90's by blaming everything on Paul Pressler for the theme park's failures.

@wkadalie

7 ай бұрын

Totally agree.... Bob Iger just doubled down on the problems. Bob Iger was the problem.

Campea will never say a disparaging word about Iger lol Chapek was a scapegoat and John never really talks about Igers missteps

@allanbroady2970

7 ай бұрын

This

@HypnoSwag

7 ай бұрын

Because like Iger John is a progressive tool.

@bobbyleonard1080

7 ай бұрын

"Big Poppa Iger" is blameless in his eyes. And Kathleen Kennedy is "the greatest producer in Hollywood according to Steven Spielberg!!!!!"

Memo to John: Things at a big studio have a life cycle that is a minimum of 3 years. Nothing Chapek green-lit has seen the light of day yet. The failures of the last two years are all things Iger green-lit BEFORE he left.

@thehacker4012

7 ай бұрын

Yeah, I'm not really buying that at all. It wasn't Iger decision to bring in so much content on Disney+ nor was it Iger decision to have bring Disney animated features like Turning Red on Disney+ either. That was all Chapek.

@SuperSupersoda

7 ай бұрын

@@thehacker4012 The decision to green-light all those things was Iger, the decision to distribute those on Disney+ was Chapek. There was only one Marvel movie green-lit under Chapek: next year's Deadpool 3. Chapek had no say in the decision to make the Marvels, that was an Iger decision.

@thehacker4012

7 ай бұрын

@@SuperSupersoda No, it's documented that it was Chapek not Iger who decided to greenlight so many projects on Disney+. And The Marvels was made under his watch, where he decided to take away authority from creatives. Sorry, but you can't pin this all on Iger.

While Chapek was bad, a lot of Disney’s problems that people complained about stemmed from Iger’s departing policies that he couldn’t get rid of.

Him being gone should have been done two years earlier. Feige might have been able to make the shows/movies better and have more control. Chapek is to blame for the MCU being the way is it now and it’s not even up for debate.

@mrcritical6751

7 ай бұрын

Agreed. Feige may be to blame for some stuff like changing course so early to Kang when that wasn’t the original intention and arguably he’s to blame for giving Taika too much creative control on Love & Thunder (can you really blame Feige on that one though, Taika had proven he could make a good Thor movie with Ragnarok and had just won an Oscar for Jojo Rabbit, anybody would trust him in that scenario). But Chapek was behind crap like cutting movies down to two hours, churning out shows we didn’t need like Agatha and that Spider-man cartoon that’s vanished off the face of the earth. He upended a billion dollar franchise that took eleven years to build

@jaybling6687

7 ай бұрын

@@mrcritical6751 Did Kevin Feige simply *let* Taika have creative control of Love & Thunder or did Feige being stretched to thin leave Taika to his own devices? Ragnarok one could argue was the perfect balance of filmmaker sensibility and producer oversight. And it’s common knowledge at this point that Feige being stretched too thin made him unable to provide sufficient oversight.

@metallicnole4514

7 ай бұрын

@@jaybling6687 I think feige was stretched too thin and he lost some of his power when chapek put his banker buddies above feige.

@jaybling6687

7 ай бұрын

@@metallicnole4514 Precisely, the bankers mandated more content in less time.

@jaybling6687

7 ай бұрын

@@exhaustguy You could say it's a combination. Feige being stretched too thin combined with slightly misguided trust that the movie didn't need babysitting based on the success of Ragnarok.

A lot of the damage was set in motion well before Chapek took over.

Isn't this the other way around?...Iger is the one that embraces all the activists vs real talents running the show(s).

@MidnightsEdge

7 ай бұрын

It is, yes. That is why all the activists rioted against Chapek. Maybe that's why Campea hates him too?

Chapek in the end was a yes man for Iger. The problem has always been Iger: Iger was a proponent of the failures of things like Fastpass and raising prices Iger wanted to break into politics and be more political. Iger pushed the expansion if Disney +. All this was more Iger than Chapek.

The Damaged tattoo on Chapek in the thumbnail is beyond genius LOL

It's ok guys Papa Iger is back!! Everything will be fine😂

Chapek might be incompetent, but the architect of Disney's destruction IS Iger.

@matthewmartinez6922

7 ай бұрын

Nope. I went to Disneyworld once in the chapek era and then another time two months ago. The change in the cast members and the trash around the parks is astronomical. Chapek nearly destroyed the parks

@allanbroady2970

7 ай бұрын

Nah that destruction started with Iger Chapel inherited is his mess when it was nothing he could do and Covid.

@krishshautriya5170

7 ай бұрын

@matthewmartinez6922 Not saying he didn't cause the destruction of the parks. All I am saying is that all the problems that have been plaguing Disney movies were started before Chapek became the ceo. By papa Iger himself.

John Campea's Chapek Derangement Syndrome seemingly knows no bounds. First of all, all that Disney + content he blames Chapek for, was already greenlit under Bob Iger, that's why we've gotten so much of it in the past THREE YEARS. Is he suggesting that Chapek should not have released what Iger ALREADY had Kathleen Kennedy and Kevin Feige put into production? Secondly, Bob Iger was in charge of everything pertaining to talent, even while Chapek was CEO. It was IGER who allowed that Scarlett Johansson situation to spin out of control, and he even signed off on the press release too. Campea really needs to read the CNBC expose about the dysfunction behind the Chapek transition. There's some eye-opening stuff there, and the one that looks all the worse for it, is Iger. Finally, Disney right now is a bombfactory because the remaining "creatives" are completely out of touch with the audience, and they have been for many years. Disney's pool of talent (and I use the term lightly) are the problem here - and in such a situation, maybe the bankers NEED to come in and provide some mandates, ie. checks, to ensure there is balance between what the creatives want to do, and what anyone wants to pay to see, and pay for merchandise for as well. One obviously does not need an extra distribution division if everything is running smoothly, but clearly, at Disney, this was not the case. Alas, the first thing Iger did upon his return, was remove those checks and balances, and hand control right back to the "creatives" ... let's see how that continues to work out as the months and years go by. Not off to a great start. The question that really needs to be asked here, is how badly has IGER screwed up Disney in the year since HIS return? Also, how much better might the company have been off if Chapek had been allowed to run it without Iger undermining him at every turn? Which he did by the way, according to CNBC - both in the press, within the C-suite, and to (what passes for) the board.

@rhetro777

7 ай бұрын

The Chapek era of Marvel and Star Wars has been the worst I've seen them.

@bobbyleonard1080

7 ай бұрын

​@@rhetro777I think you mean The Iger Era, since he's responsible for the mess those franchises are in.

4:23 Iger wanted D+ to be the best version of the Disney 'Vault' Chapek wanted it as a money pit he could dive into ala Scrooge McDuck

Chapek is a scapegoat a lot of what caused Disneys downfall was set in motion by iger

@carmelosmith8782

7 ай бұрын

Care to explain? Last time I checked my stocks at Disney was at a all time high during iger run at disney after chapek took over all hell broke loose

@allanbroady2970

7 ай бұрын

Igor pushed raising prices which was bad enough til families started to decline on the parks way before Covid. Iger considering his political influenced the political stance of Disney Iger not Chapek was the proponent of pushing streaming focusing on Marvel and Star wars products to push at the parks that most people couldnt either afford or did not like Iger has had a hand in a lot of Disney mishaps

@thedjib9658

7 ай бұрын

​@@carmelosmith8782all the Marvel and Star Wars shows on Disney+ were Iger's idea, not Chapek's. Not a single movie that was greenlit under Chapek has come out yet, so I don't get how that's his fault. Its ironic that Iger is now talking about quality over quantity, when he was the one who wanted a new Star Wars movie every year.

Blame chapek but I still see the terrible decisions and content coming from Disney…. So who’s to blame now?

@denissarajlic2242

7 ай бұрын

Content coming out from disney today is still the content made during Chapek era. It takes 2-3 years for movie/show to be made. So they have to pull out WB "Coyote vs Acme" move on those projects, or release them. Either way, they lose in the eyes of the public. So we gotta wait. Creative control is back where it should be. Give them a year or two to see the results.

@MidnightsEdge

7 ай бұрын

​@@denissarajlic2242Incorrect. You know which Marvel project Chapek greenlight under the Kareem Daniels structure? I'll tell you: Deadpool 3. That's it. All the other crap that has destroyed Marvel, including the stuff which just so happened to be RELEASED under Chapek, was developed and greenlit under Feige, Alonso and IGER - All of it. Campea is straight up wrong about this.

@BasedOnTheTrailer

7 ай бұрын

@@MidnightsEdge projects might have been greenlight before him but where still produced under him, so try again

@jessieurena7583

7 ай бұрын

A shinking ship? 😂😂🤣 Disney had 9 different billion dollar films in 2019 Yea real sinking ship alright

@MidnightsEdge

7 ай бұрын

@@jessieurena7583 2019 is ancient history. How many billiondolar films did they have this year?

You summed it up nicely in the end. Disney himself was a creative. Disney works when you have creatives allowed to be creative. The arts in general works when the creatives are allowed to create. Now creatives need limits they need the Chapeck types to focus them in but they should never be in charge of creative endeavors.

Disney is partly in the mess they're in because there's no checks & balances and there's no accountability for failure. Campea ALWAYS talks about how Bob Chapstick had the creatives power taken away, but when the creatives have full control we get Lightyear, The Marvels, The Acolyte, Elemental. The creatives need checks & balances, which is what Bob Chopsticks was trying to do. Have a layer of management there to ensure crap like The Eternals & She Hulk wouldn't get made. Also, there would be ACCOUNTABILITY for failure. If the creatives were held accountable for their failures then maybe we'd be getting less failures because their jobs/income would be on the line.

@MatiZ815

7 ай бұрын

This is stupid. While it is true that a lot of the projects were announced when Iger was still there, the first year of Phase 4 was very good. Sure, there were a couple below average releases but no more than during any of the previous Phases. Eternals was probably the only failed project of 2021, all the other ones were more or less good. The true decline started with Thor 4 and She-Hulk halfway through 2022. MCU HAD hard quality control with Kevin Feige who was hands on every single production. Marvel studios had the most extensive quality control in Hollywood but when Chapek was pushing for more and more content for Disney+, Feige was no longer able to oversee everything as he used to. Chapek’s management resulted in the loss of quality checks of creatives’ work in the MCU. The creators ARE being accounted for their work, always have been. Do you think that when a director or a writer does a poor job they are still gonna be working on other projects? Jeff Loveness got fired from Kang Dynasty after Ant-Man 3, Taika is not gonna do another Thor, Daredevil writers and directors got fired halfway through production. So what on Earth are you even talking about? Also, Acolyte didn’t even come out yet nor there was any footage released to verify. There’s nothing out there to justify calling it a failure.

@bobbyleonard1080

7 ай бұрын

@@MatiZ815 Sorry bro, but you lost me when you said " the first year of phase 4 was very good".

@MatiZ815

7 ай бұрын

@@bobbyleonard1080 You lost me in the very first sentence but I still read your comment to make sure I get what you’re saying so I could write an adequate response that refers to the points you made. Now, Eternals was boring as hell. But other films were good. No Way Home was awesome, Shang-Chi was a very good introduction of a new character, Black Widow was probably most mediocre but solid and definitely better than some films released in the previous years. There were also 5 shows and all of them were received very positively with maybe Hawkeye getting more of a mixed reception. So yeah, very good especially considering how much they released that year. Then the real problems began with 2022 being more 50/50 and with 2023 being mostly disappointing.

@gingeralebean5375

7 ай бұрын

@@MatiZ815Eternals, Black Widow, and Shang Chi barely broke even at the box office and MOST of the MCU shows after Wandavision had depleting audience numbers. Just because a film/show has a fresh score today, doesn’t mean it was financially successful for the brand when it was initially released. Multiverse of Madness almost made 1 billion, which may be very good, but it also had an over 60% audience drop on its second weekend and it never recovered afterwards. Just because YOU think the phase 4 was good, doesn’t mean you gotta go around the internet arguing with people who don’t. There’s a vast majority of the MCU fans that dislike much of Phase 4 and Phase 5, for very good reasons. And the numbers and statistics prove that. Not saying you’re NOT allowed to like it, but you don’t gotta argue lol

@MatiZ815

7 ай бұрын

@@gingeralebean5375 I’m not talking about box office but the quality. Two entirely seperate things. Captain Marvel broke a billion despite being one of the weakest MCU films and Loki 2 that was one of the most well received things in a while kept losing audience. I remember that first year and by 2022 when Doctor Strange and Moon Knight were coming out almost everyone was still very positive about the MCU. You don’t have to take my word for it, just go back to those comment sections. Some of those things I’m saying do not even reflect my own feelings, for example I did not like the first season of Loki but I’m not gonna pretend that most people didn’t love it: they did. And your logic cuts both ways: if I’m not allowed to present my opinion then those who think differently can’t either. By challenging my opinion YOU are doing exactly the same thing you are criticizing me for. Not saying you’re not allowed to dislike it but you don’t get to argue.

Iger is doing damage too. He says some of the right things. But hasn’t shown an ability to pivot.

@carmelosmith8782

7 ай бұрын

As John said shits not going to change in just a days it takes years for the effect to occur

@DoomBlazer

7 ай бұрын

If you actually watched the video you would hear John say it’s not gonna change immediately it’ll take awhile

I don't care what any of you say, when you are the boss it is on you. The guy who owns the agency that represents Scarlett tried to have a face to face with Chapek, he couldn't believe what Chapek said to him, this was not phone call Bob said this to his face, he pulled the have your people call my people thing, The very next day they filed the lawsuit. He almost made Feige quit. The last person you want piss off is Feige. From what everybody said he was in over his head to begin with.

Goodness…time certainly flies.

Iger is more to blame than Chapek. Iger left him a mess to deal with. Heck Bob never even left his office and Chapek had to deal with running a company and not be charman of the board.

@johncampea

7 ай бұрын

You do realize that VAST majorities of CEOs are not also the Chairmen of the Board right? It's rate that someone is both.

@watsonsmith4126

7 ай бұрын

​@@johncampea yes. It is rare that a CEO is also the Chairman of the Board. The one thing that has me worried about Marvel Phase 6 is the inconsistent quality that has plagued Phase 4 and has seemingly bled into Phase 5.

He may have done irreversible damage

@watsonsmith4126

7 ай бұрын

Yeah, but Bob Chapek was the one who actually did damage to the company more than Bob Iger did

Single handling destroy the MCU by demanding quantity over quality so Disney plus can have content.

@Christian39521

7 ай бұрын

That was Iger. People are blaming Chapek for stuff Iger did. All of that was already in production when Chapek took over.

That shot of Walt Disney Statue with the 7 dwarves I saw twenty years ago. I had a make a wish trip to meet roy e Disney what's nephew. My family had a 5 hour private tour of Disney studios lot. I even go to see the Disney vault. That shot just reminded me of that experience

Disney as a whole buried themselves

I keep having to explain that marvel was doing 12 projects a years with dates 5 years out that's 60 projects at the same time, this has already been fixed but we won't see it till 2025

Micheal eisner was way better than iger

@watsonsmith4126

7 ай бұрын

Was he really?? You know that he got fired by the board of directors, right???

@mgmboy3778

7 ай бұрын

@@watsonsmith4126 that don't mean shit Eisner play the huge part into Disney saving because remember Disney was going downhill in bronze era

After really thinking about it I think I know what was the downfall of the Marvel brand. Was it Chapek or Iger who decided to merge TV with Movies???? This is the main reason things went bad in my opinion. Most of the complaints about Marvel if you really think about it stem from the TV shows. Back when all you had to focus on were a few movies a year quality control was that much easier. They should of never merged them. The TV side should of all been "What if" type stories that featured Marvel characters, but didn't actually tie into the MCU. Then if they wanted to do the Kang stuff, they could of tied them in saying that these are alternate timelines making them relevant, but not necessary to the main universe.

@abloshow91

7 ай бұрын

Wasn't Disney + an iger decision

Disney, you have still failed this fandom. 🎯

Big Poppa Iger

The weirdos in the comments blaming Iger for everything No John is right there is a reason the Board fired Chapek

@kundaigotore992

6 ай бұрын

The weirdos have a narrative in their heads since last decade, they’re still holding to those ideas even though it’s clear that Chapek was the main problem.

Too much meddling in the creative process from Chapek. Glad Disney's course correcting before they become Warner Bros.

@bobbyleonard1080

7 ай бұрын

Actually they're worse than Warner Bros. Warner didn't have every movie they released this year bomb spectacularly. They had Barbie, which made a billion dollars. Disney lost a billion dollars.

@watsonsmith4126

7 ай бұрын

Yeah, but the DC films haven't been doing well at the box office. (I saw Blue Beetle in theaters, and I enjoyed it)

@bodhisattvaFM

7 ай бұрын

@@bobbyleonard1080 Yeah, I kind of agree with that. Warner Bros has a reputation for meddling with their creatives. That's what got them in trouble with Snyder and many many others. It's not that Warner doesn't make good movies, it's just that when they do it's like the director won a hand of blackjack against the suits. Disney was going that same direction. Now they can get back on track.

You just get the feeling that Kareem convinced Chapek to make that strategic and structural change and give him the job.

Fun fact: Chapek got fired from Disney on my birthday!🎉

I agree Iger is much better than Chapek, but I have to wonder if Iger still holds the same philosophy about Disney being run by creatives. Especially after the writers/actors strike and the issues with AI that the studios held strong to, at this point I have to wonder if Iger views the company and those who work for it in the same way as he did when he first started.

We can scapegoat the business arm all we want but at the end of the day creative is the blame for the awful storylines they've put out. One doesn't even need to look that hard as the disaster of the DareDevil production debacle can attest. Not to mention all the time and money spent trying to setup the Kang Dynasty and now maybe scrap it entirely and go back to the drawing board. The math doesn't add up they we're given more than enough production time comparatively to released hours of entertainment created and god knows more than enough capital to produce it. If the current creative team keeps fumbling the ball and stepping on every rake at every turn their days could be numbered.

@wkadalie

7 ай бұрын

I mean the business arm decides the direction. They hired the bad writers. Chose what to greenlight.

@bobbyleonard1080

7 ай бұрын

Don't forget they're completely re-writing & re-shooting Captain America 4, which is even more costly than scrapping & re-doing The Daredevil show.

I agree, creators should run Disney

Quality over quantity Disney… Star Wars and MCU are in the dirt, these IPs need a massive break instead of churning endless mediocre content

Love the Bob Chapek vids, let the good times roll with the Bob Chapek greatest hits LMFAO

I thought Kevin feigi was back in charge. He should have have changed the marvels around to be a better movie as I heard it’s not

I just love the comment sections under such discussions where people are giving suggestions and speculating what might've happened. It's really funny because there's no responsibility on their shoulders, when it comes down to it and they're responsible for a billion dollar conglomerate every single one will lose their shit. If the decision chapek or iger took turned out to be right, everyone will be cheering on...........i remember very well when marty made the "marvel is not cinema" comment, MCU was successful and in It's berserk form and the whole you tube and internet was filled with people roasting him about some trivial definition of cinema and now 5 years later when marvel is struggling now everyone is blaming them for killing it, it's easy to put blame when somebody is wrong, in hindsight everything seems so obvious or is made to look that way, it's never that easy. Maybe disney will recover or it won't but nothing can change the fact that some of my best moments of last decade were due to disney and marvel.

Bob Paycheck

He did not write that movie he did not write Quantumania. He did not write Ant-man.

@okechukwuumeano586

7 ай бұрын

The structure he put in place played a crucial role in the hiring process of a lot of the mediocre writers of phase 4 and early phase 5. Its a ripple effect of bad leadership.

@MidnightsEdge

7 ай бұрын

​@@okechukwuumeano586Incorrect. All of phase 4 and everything released in phase 5 so far was developed, overseen and greenlit by Kevin Feige and Victoria Alonso, under the supervision of BOB IGER. Want to know what came out of Chapek and Kareem Daniel's structure? Deadpool 3. That's it. Listening to Campea on this matter, has left you severly disinformed.

@okechukwuumeano586

7 ай бұрын

@@MidnightsEdge phase 4 and early phase 5 were developed under years ago under Chapek. Those projects were announced prematurely mostly to appease investors hence the reason they were mostly half-baked. This is common knowledge, it has nothing to do with John Campea

Marvel had an awesome 15 years of movies that made billions. Chapek destroyed that in 3 years. Now people walk away from Marvel movies and I don't know if they will come back soon.

@user-ft6vu4gk2p

7 ай бұрын

They will for avengers 5 and 6 and x men

@watsonsmith4126

7 ай бұрын

You mean "Avengers 5 & 6",along with a "Fantastic Four" reboot

Considering Disney refuses to pay authors royalties on tons of print media its not surprising this operando finally made it to the top.

Oh yeah, I forgot he existed.

I hope he is happy with his millions of $ and the big Bonus he got when he left! He is? 😠

The problem with d+ content is that all the marvel/starwars products that they invested in was the same medium. Nothing was unique or new. Why not have a new animated star wars story? Or intoduce more obscure marvel properties in new cartoon shows. Either for kids or adults. Look how popular invincible s1 was. And marvel has way more recognizable people.

@ahmadkaien

7 ай бұрын

They did this. Star wars has animation that was made for d+ it's like 1 series but it's there. Marvel has did a few animated shows but I think the only one with praise was Hit monkey 'What-if' is a wonderful novelty to complement the multiverse

@Jones-ke6bt

7 ай бұрын

@@ahmadkaien what if is such a terrible example. And if I am right, so is the stsr wars example. What if are basically "for funsies" stories that are not in cannon, have no lasting impact, don't introduce new long lasting characters, etc etc. You could go on and on and on about the essential irrelevance of what if. Not a good example in the slightest. But good try.

I like to give CEOs time to implement their plans but I didnt like Chapek from the start. As soon as I saw him put his goons in charge I knew it was the wrong path.

Ya he really knew how to treat the talent < almost single handily the man responsible for the 4 month actor strike. Releasing public statements against the union and their unrealistic terms when it comes to AI.

@Tuntira

7 ай бұрын

This was an industry problem. And actually Netflix were the ones who were the most difficult

Not sure why you ever thought he was a good choice. Was an amusement park guy trying to run an entertainment industry. Should’ve stuck to his lane, though the parks had been going downhill. Deserved a firing, not a promotion. Spelled disaster from the beginning.

John I'm about to start this video and I'm already blown away that you covered everything that Bob Chapek ruined in under 20 minutes 😅

Bob was carrying out Iger's wishes

@TerrellAustin19941

7 ай бұрын

Yep

Lol. What does what's on D+ have to do with love & Thunder and quantumania being absolute ass? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. This is the usual crap, everything Feigie does is great, everything bad is someone else's fault. Everyone loves Bob Iger. Except the dudes been saying the dumbest shit during the strike. Come on man.

@frankie8387

7 ай бұрын

The relationship is chapek created more bureaucracy, took power away from the creatives, over saturated the mcu brand….and as a by product was a loss of quality control, lousy and unnecessary leadership structure, and set the brand up for failure.

@elcapitan2293

7 ай бұрын

@frankie8387 and who's telling you that, except the people who are still there. Also, the guy was ceo for just two years. Why we acting like the projects in his first year weren't mostly filmed and approved by Iger anyway? It's a false narrative to say we're still going to see the effects of chapek over the next yr, but act like his first yr as ceo wasn't all Iger stuff anyway.

@quiett6191

7 ай бұрын

@@frankie8387 seeing as how the creatives Disney were bringing in contributed to this mess with their lackluster work (ie writing, directing), giving them full control probarbly isn't the answer either. As to the oversaturation, practically all of Disney's line up was green lit under Iger. I believe Chapek greenlit Deadpool 3, and thats it.

@jessieurena7583

7 ай бұрын

Yea because the VFX department and Feige got pulled apart and stretched thin to make 100 million diff shows and movies for Disney plus

@elcapitan2293

7 ай бұрын

@jessieurena7583 if you've actually read up on the vfx issues, then you know it started when Iger was in charge. You know that the studio working on guardians 2, which came out in 2017, was given very little time to work on it. And even then, when they found the release date was moved up by 1 month, they found because of a news article. Marvel forgot to tell them. So look that up.

You can only blame Chapec for so long. With Wish out now we will see if they can turn things around. Chapec was/is part of the problem they know what they are doing to drive their audiences away. Love your show but there’s accountability that needs to be placed around the board.

You summed up all the points. Chapek ruined The MCU, Star Wars, basically all their important IP’s due to making and rushing content for Disney+, if Iger never left we wouldn’t be dealing with all this dilemma

@MidnightsEdge

7 ай бұрын

Yes we would. You know which Marvels projects were greenlit by Bob Chapek under the Kareem Daniels structure? Deadpool 3. That's it. That's where the Chapek era of Marvel begins and ends. If you look at the calendar, you'll find that all of the Marvel and Star Wars content that happened to be RELEASED in the brief window where Chapek was CEO, had been developed by Kevin Feige and Victoria Alonso and GREENLIT BY IGER, and for the most part, also been filmed under IGER. The MCU was destroyed by Feige, Alonso and IGER. The early steps towards a pivot however, begun under Chapek. Learn to properly assign credit and blame.

@ElmerPonceCastro

7 ай бұрын

Yes we would have lol; Chapek was just Iger’s scapegoat.

@MidnightsEdge

7 ай бұрын

@Comicbookfanboy31 It was. Campea is suffering a bad case of Chapek Derangement Syndrome, which prevents him from seeing that everything he scapegoats Chapek for, is in reality his hero "Big Poppa" Iger's doing.

@bobbyleonard1080

7 ай бұрын

​@@MidnightsEdgeTHIS! Thank you for saying this & you're absolutely right. Campea will never put any blame on "Big Poppa Iger" or Feige. They're blameless. It's all Bob Chapstick's fault....Even though he wasn't around long enough to do this much damage. But don't think about that. It was that Bob Chopsticks guy. Yeah.

@SuperSupersoda

7 ай бұрын

The last Star Wars theatrical movie was released in 2019. There hasn't been a theatrical movie since then. The reason SW is broken has nothing to do with Chapek, it was broken well before he took over Disney.

Campea is nuts. Bob Chopstick was the best CEO ever.

Can we be honest about the fact that Disney lost its family appeal because they brought left wing politics and shoved down its audience as objective morality and turned into a political mouth piece instead of the genuine entertainment it was?

@Christopher_TG

6 ай бұрын

Left-leaning guy here. If you think Disney's been "pushing left wing politics" in their films, then you don't really know much about left wing politics. If Disney really was doing that, they wouldn't have dropped Nimona. Maybe lay off of Fox News for a bit and get a bit of a wider perspective on the world.

@TheVisualante

6 ай бұрын

@@Christopher_TG maybe don’t assume, I hate Fox News. But that’s what I expect from someone who can’t see the glaring politics in Disney’s movies. Oh wait it’s never enough for someone left leaning.

@ComingSoonOnVHS

6 ай бұрын

@@TheVisualante yikes, you are so hateful for nothing

@TheVisualante

6 ай бұрын

@@ComingSoonOnVHS how’s that hateful or do you just toss random words around