Tune to Times.Radio 📻 Times.Radio/subscribe 📈

@rajveerkanojiya2985

11 ай бұрын

no

@postfactumlauda

11 ай бұрын

months ago, after serious threats of nuking Ukraine, the US made quite clear that there would have been a serious retaliation on Russia. Now only imagine if and only if mafia boss Putin is going to nuke one NATO country. By the way NATO has no nuclear weapons, the states which own it would use them, not NATO itself. Hopefully mafia boss Putin and his mob won't activate the MAD hypotesis, noetheless Yuri Felshtinski is giving an unusual insight on how those gangsters think, quite scary.

@antonyjackson1257

11 ай бұрын

​@@rajveerkanojiya2985😊😊

@petardetar5191

11 ай бұрын

How Europe sees the Ukraine War Now - Alastair Crooke fmr Brit Ambassador

@YemposMengAnalyst

11 ай бұрын

This guys good analysis right

The USSR is dead. Get over it.

@psychologianiestacjonarna6558

11 ай бұрын

That's not what 100 million Russian vatniks think. Take a look at their IG accounts with pictures of Stalin posted... Russia should be demilitarised, scrutinised and supervised by an international body, just like Germany in 1945. Otherwise there's no guarantees of a long lasting peace in Europe and in the world

@macmcleod1188

11 ай бұрын

I'm starting to think the Russian Federation is dead. They may no longer have the power to subject the client states any more. This could get pretty messy like Yugoslavia in the late 90s.

@Jethr001

11 ай бұрын

It was…but Putin thinks it was only temporary and he LIED his was through the slump. Now, he wants as much as he can get before he dies. WHAT HAPPENS IF HE DIES??

@amgb8252

11 ай бұрын

@@macmcleod1188 You mean early 90s. Croatian war for independence lasted until 95 and it is eerie how similar these conflicts are. From both the reason of the aggressor for attacking to the military state of the defenders in the early stages of the war. And hopefully, the outcome

@stevea2909

11 ай бұрын

Not according to Putin

Saying NATO would attack Belarus if nukes were launched from there is like saying NATO would attack the Atlantic ocean if nukes were launched from a submarine there. NATO would know where the nukes were ultimately from.

@entelin

11 ай бұрын

Well, absent of Belarus kicking Russian forces out, NATO probably would at least strike Russian forces in Belarus. They wouldn't stop with that of course.

@Quidisi

11 ай бұрын

I wish she would have dug deeper on that point. But I guess if the Russians in Belarus start slinging tactical nukes unto Ukrainians, Belarus really would get hammered by NATO. His point is worthy of consideration. Scary stuff.

@thomasjamison2050

11 ай бұрын

NATO would much prefer to fight Russia in Belarus rather than in Poland or the Baltic states.

@tonupharry

11 ай бұрын

Ruzzian logic is very childish, I think Nato would take out Ruzzian missiles before they get anywhere near launching . Moscow and Putin would be a major target .

@davidelliott5843

11 ай бұрын

Belarus is relatively lightly populated so if push comes to shove, better NATO fighting there than Poland or the Baltics.

I really don’t think NATO would view a strike from Belarus as anything other than a strike by Russia itself. I think that’s some wishful thinking on Putin’s part.

@stevev238

11 ай бұрын

I'd agree. Whatever else Mr Potato Head has done to suppress his own people, he's not exactly trying to expand his territory.

@SoloRenegade

11 ай бұрын

if Belarus fires a nuke, Belarus is equally as guilty as Russia, and will be held accountable for firing nukes.

@meridien52681

11 ай бұрын

Russia doesn't believe the rest of NATO wouldn't chop Russia's military into little tiny pieces? Starting a nuclear war endangering Europe?? This speaker is totally off his rocker.

@jonathanrice1070

11 ай бұрын

@@meridien52681 Also, does Putin not realize two can play that game? Does Belarus? Strategic Air Command could be reborn.

@mgc7199

11 ай бұрын

The US is using NATO to drive a wedge between east and west, knowing that if Eurasia ever unites, the US's position in the unipolar world they created is lost. Allow me to explain: As it is the petrodollar that funds the US military and it is demand for this fiat currency that determines its value, the US needs to have resources traded in dollars in order to maintain the military strength that is above and beyond what any nation not benefitting from their currency being the world reserve currency has. Enter the proposed BRICS gold backed currency (to be decided in august): This coin is a serious threat to US hegemony because of the reasons above and is the driving factor for the US to promote war in Ukraine (where most of the pipelines that transport primary energy from east to west which would eventually need to be paid for in the new currency are) and to blow up the nordstream pipeline. Obviously getting Russia to appear to be the bad guy plays into their plans as well, whereas it is actually the US trying to push NATO east despite having promised to leave Russia with buffer states that was cause for Russia to take action.

This man has a unique perspective. Born in Russia he thinks like a Russian, and can thus mind read the FSB and Putin. "if the victim does not think straight, beat him harder until he does". Scary reality, All Western politicians should take his perspective in to account when planning policy and moves. Only strength deters Russians.

@geraldkniendl4987

11 ай бұрын

After reading Catherine beltons Putins people and bill browder s books and knowing some Russians I unfortunately have to agree by and large with this assessment

@RangerB66

11 ай бұрын

@@geraldkniendl4987 yeah agreed; same situation as you describe, here as well. All these people understand is brute force. I guess they're seeing just how 'super' their power really is, now. Well, that's what you get when you have a spy agency running the country.

@mgc7199

11 ай бұрын

The US is using NATO to drive a wedge between east and west, knowing that if Eurasia ever unites, the US's position in the unipolar world they created is lost. Allow me to explain: As it is the petrodollar that funds the US military and it is demand for this fiat currency that determines its value, the US needs to have resources traded in dollars in order to maintain the military strength that is above and beyond what any nation not benefitting from their currency being the world reserve currency has. Enter the proposed BRICS gold backed currency (to be decided in august): This coin is a serious threat to US hegemony because of the reasons above and is the driving factor for the US to promote war in Ukraine (where most of the pipelines that transport primary energy from east to west which would eventually need to be paid for in the new currency are) and to blow up the nordstream pipeline. Obviously getting Russia to appear to be the bad guy plays into their plans as well, whereas it is actually the US trying to push NATO east despite having promised to leave Russia with buffer states that was cause for Russia to take action.

@bencarter1666

11 ай бұрын

They'll respond tenfold.. Like they're going to take orders

@jimbanda

11 ай бұрын

Clown , like you are gonna beat a country with 6000 nuclear weapons in some kind of humiliating submission. The west started this, it's time for peace.

If ukraine has to give up some of its land then i suggest thoise who agree with this should also give up part of their land, otherwise they should all shut up and just help ukraine.

@mikefox955

11 ай бұрын

It's been taken and it's not coming back. What will Banderastan do about it? Fight until the last Ukrainian

@user-lu7qh9hj3n

11 ай бұрын

Don't see a problem, the Russians are away...

@timonsolus

11 ай бұрын

Finland had to give up some of its land after WW2. So did Poland (although it gained some German territory in return). Even South Korea had to give up a small part of its land at the end of the Korean War (although it took more of North Korea’s land in return). So there are historical precedents of countries that did nothing wrong and were attacked anyway having to accept border adjustments in return for peace.

@CSpiv662

11 ай бұрын

@@timonsolus of course. How much land should Ukraine demand russia give up as reparations?

@Psychol-Snooper

11 ай бұрын

@@timonsolus I agree. Russia should give up it's access to the Black Sea to The Ukraine and Georgia, and free Chechnya. Along with paying full reparations to all injured parties, including Russians imprisoned for patriotically protesting against this unlawful war. They should do anything for peace before Russia falls to ruin.

With or without the threat or use of nuclear weapons Russia cannot prevail in any conflict with NATO. If Russia give a reason for article five to be instigated and executed it will be the end of this version of Russia.

@frankk6416

11 ай бұрын

If NATO engages directly with Russia, it's quite likely it'll result in the end of this version of the planet. Russia can't prevail against NATO, accordingly it's highly likely that the conflict would escalate to a point we don't want to visit.

@chrisdemopoulos41

11 ай бұрын

How would america fare in a nuclear conflict with russia?

@margelatu79

11 ай бұрын

In your delusional mind! NATO couldn't even defeat the talibans who were fighting without any military backing

@skdfdjkdfjkd

11 ай бұрын

@@margelatu79 Russia was also in Afghanistan fighting Taliban, remember how that went?

@richrollin4867

11 ай бұрын

Russia may count on raising the stakes to a degree that NATO countries cannot collectively stomach.

Two words: Mutually Assured Destruction. If one nuke is launched, its lights out for all of us no matter where it comes from or goes to.

@javierfrancia1938

11 ай бұрын

NATO trained UAF has lost, conclusion: Russia has defeated NATO

@gerardovicidomini261

11 ай бұрын

Thee words, 1…2…3! 🙈

@salvatoreventaglio3782

11 ай бұрын

I don't think american will put L.A. or N.Y. at stake for the sake of any european city. The american nuke umbrella is a fairtale for candid people.

@scottkrater2131

11 ай бұрын

​@@salvatoreventaglio3782 come find out. A nuclear strike by Russia will initiate a counter strike by the US and you know it.

@andyharpist2938

11 ай бұрын

Absolutely shows what a twisted mind he has.

It should be made clear, well in advance of July 1, that if any Russian nuclear weapon is launched, from any territory, it will be handled as if the weapon was launched by Russia itself. That is the best description of the reality as well.

@andyhowells1141

11 ай бұрын

Correct !

@a.u.b1

11 ай бұрын

Same as any Nato weapons fired in Russia is considered as if the weapons were fired by Nato😂

@andyhowells1141

11 ай бұрын

@@a.u.b1 Now you're being silly :-)

@a.u.b1

11 ай бұрын

@@andyhowells1141 no , I am simply following his logic.

@nixxonnor

11 ай бұрын

@@a.u.b1 Do not pretend that nuclear weapons, in any meaningful way, are similar to regular weapons. The western weapons that is supported to Ukraine is used locally inside Ukraine. Not even Mr. Putin would have any interest in Russian nuclear weapons being launched from Belarus to hit other parts of Belarus. And that is not because the nuclear detonations in Belarus will contaminate the entire world in devestating ways.

The man is exactly right when he says that "the only way to end this war is to win this war." Far too many people seem to think that there is a way to end it by negotiation. As a historian he has learned from the past and Western politicians should listen to him. Direct attacks into the border regions are necessary to degrade Russia's ability to operate in Ukraine. Attacks deeper into Russia, by either Ukrainian assets or Russian sympathisers, are helpful even if for no other reason than bringing the war home to the Russian people.

@72mespo

11 ай бұрын

You first. Let me know how 10000 degrees Celsius feels.

@apveening

11 ай бұрын

The war needs to be brought home to the Kremlin.

@Acolis

11 ай бұрын

that ship (negotiations) sailed long ago. at this point we (the collective west) are all in now. all this aid we have sent ukraine, if they lose it will all be for nothing. there really shouldnt be anymore delays, any more discussions, any more sabre rattling. if ukraine says we need X equipment then ukraine gets it. part of me wants russia to use a nuclear weapon just so we can glass moscow and st petersburg.

@SerBallister

11 ай бұрын

@@72mespo Do you think nuclear armed powers have the right to redraw national borders how they see fit?

@72mespo

11 ай бұрын

@@SerBallister You mean like the US staging a coup in Ukraine to change the government to a puppet which alienated the ethnic Russians in the Eastern provinces leading to their shelling bythe US puppet and eventually to Russia entering to protect them? That kind of redrawing?

If Russia used any type of nuclear weapon they will be met with the same only worse.

@bushwhackeddos.2703

11 ай бұрын

They have nukes pointed at every western country,

@amossimon3438

11 ай бұрын

If Russia uses nukes all there allies .like China North Korea.would have do same.

@Acolis

11 ай бұрын

i kind of hope they do just so we can.

@berg8970

11 ай бұрын

@@Acolis This isn't a video game, FFS.

@martavdz4972

11 ай бұрын

@@Acolis Please don't hope. Nuclear weapons can have horrible long-term effects on people's health, I don't wish that on anyone.

Agreed. Time to act and do more is now. Time to end the terror of Putler

@user-dz9mo2lz2k

11 ай бұрын

Ukraiian troupe have been committing Genocide against the Russian people in Ukrainian for years.get .......get your facts right

@stevenaustin8274

11 ай бұрын

Yeah and take out Putin at the same time

@luftim

11 ай бұрын

They will split up Russia even more, like they did with the soviet union. Wait and see

@clives344

11 ай бұрын

Putin only understands force

@danielbailey5849

11 ай бұрын

Yeah of course end of human raise great idea , for one country who not part of nato and not our proper allies

I don't have the skills or mental acuity to know if Mr.Felshtinsky is wrong or if he's right. But I think he certainly adds to the discourse, which has value.

@mgc7199

11 ай бұрын

The US is using NATO to drive a wedge between east and west, knowing that if Eurasia ever unites, the US's position in the unipolar world they created is lost. Allow me to explain: As it is the petrodollar that funds the US military and it is demand for this fiat currency that determines its value, the US needs to have resources traded in dollars in order to maintain the military strength that is above and beyond what any nation not benefitting from their currency being the world reserve currency has. Enter the proposed BRICS gold backed currency (to be decided in august): This coin is a serious threat to US hegemony because of the reasons above and is the driving factor for the US to promote war in Ukraine (where most of the pipelines that transport primary energy from east to west which would eventually need to be paid for in the new currency are) and to blow up the nordstream pipeline. Obviously getting Russia to appear to be the bad guy plays into their plans as well, whereas it is actually the US trying to push NATO east despite having promised to leave Russia with buffer states that was cause for Russia to take action.

@hsuccop

11 ай бұрын

Adding to discourse means adding more than just words.

@psymantronic1528

11 ай бұрын

He's on Lieing Times Radio - they only have pro Zelensky commentators on, so he's just adding to the miscourse not the discourse.

@halfalligator6518

11 ай бұрын

Nobody can really be wrong or right without all the info anyway. Like even if hes right... it's still an educated guess. Sometimes events unfold that cannot be predicted by reason alone. What you can do is make sensible bets, hedged bets, and try weigh the likelihood in combination with the severity so we're ready for the worst without over reacting too much. In the past we clearly didn't react enough to Russia's aggression. We were naive as a collective.

@philiprufus4427

11 ай бұрын

Beleive him ! Russia has more or les had murderous regimes since 1917.

Decolonize Russia

@tonupharry

11 ай бұрын

Free manchuria,

@oneshothunter9877

11 ай бұрын

Free elections for all republics. Russia will split up by itself.

@zeanu2015

11 ай бұрын

Decolonize Russia ????? from whom ??? Russian people and then put NATO ???

@junahn1907

11 ай бұрын

@@tonupharry And Buryatia!

@nigelmorley5414

11 ай бұрын

@@tonupharry China will sort that

This guy saying Belarusians are just Russians is part of the problem with how Russians see themselves and their neighbours. I would be like an English person saying Welsh people are just English people because they were forced to speak english and had their own language and culture taken from them by and aggressive, stringer neighbour.

@veganlion8662

11 ай бұрын

I think he intended to say that Russians and Belarusians can't be distinguished by their physical appearance. So when Russian forces came to back-up Lukashenka's own Belarusian forces, those Russian forces could easily be framed as Belarusian once, to take away the impression that Putin was keeping Lukashenka in power.

@jeanneknight4791

11 ай бұрын

No. He said that Putin thinks this.

@Havardr_Ash_Kenaz

11 ай бұрын

Not the same thing at all. Lol

@Vzzdak

11 ай бұрын

He said that their language was essentially the same. Looking at Russian military casualities, the ethnic minorities are dying more than "pure" Russians.

@TheTargetedScapegoat

11 ай бұрын

The entire new world is a segregated mess of British, Spanish, French, Italian, etc that should be protected from any remaining indigenous native gambling institutions.

Nicely done

Very up lifting.

Well that cheered me up.

Everything Felshtinsky says made complete sense until, at the end of the interview, he says Putin would use nuclear weapons against Lithuania and Poland. If that were to happen, the response from Nato would be so devastating that Moscow would be destroyed and Putin would be the first casualty. So perhaps Feshtinsky needs to rethink his vision here. The more likely scenario is that Nato will allow Ukraine to use western weapons to attack strategic military targets inside Russia and Belarussia, such as air-fields, ammunition dumps, fuel depots, command & control centres, and that some of these targets would be in and around Moscow itself, just to bring it home to the ordinary citizens of Russia that Putin is a tyrant who is bringing death and destruction to his own country, including 200,000 Russian soldiers either killed or wounded so far. The Russian people need to wake up, smell the coffee and depose Putin and his brutal genocidal regime. They need to learn, like the Poles, that power lies in numbers of ordinary people, opposing the regime. Solidarnosc!

@vincentvandergoes444

11 ай бұрын

While yes the response would be devastating, the problem is that Putin might be deluded enough to think the West wouldn't dare. He was deluded enough to think the Ukranians would welcome him.

@greatspottedwoodpeck

11 ай бұрын

@@vincentvandergoes444 Well, deluded or not, it is likely he will die if he goes ahead with any lunatic attacks on neighbouring sovereign states.

@dessmith7658

11 ай бұрын

It all comes from America basically

@stevea2909

11 ай бұрын

@@dessmith7658 explain

@TedATL1

11 ай бұрын

You take it as a given that NATO would go to full war with Russia after an attack on Lithuania or Poland. The problem is, Putin may think he can win a giant game of Chicken. That the West will compromise heavily on Ukraine rather than go to full war.

What a clever man 👍👍he says as it is, from Poland 🇵🇱 Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦

Very competent man.

Are some of Russia's nuclear weapons those which were confiscated from Ukraine in 1994 when in exchange, the U.S., the U.K. and Russia would guarantee Ukraine's security? Much is owed Ukraine and it's long-suffering peoples.

I love how Medvedev is getting systematically dissed and belittled on every single western media.😂

@rodmarker2071

11 ай бұрын

Bagdad Bob LoL

@RangerB66

11 ай бұрын

I'm not sure who's more entertaining, Medvedev or that goofball Konashenkov from the MoD who speaks of great Russian victories every day.

@neilpountney9414

11 ай бұрын

I think everyone knows he is a liar, a coward, and a puppet.

@TedATL1

11 ай бұрын

That's because he sounds like Baghdad Bob.

@willc1294

11 ай бұрын

@@neilpountney9414 as most russians are.

Great intervju! Thank You!

What makes him think that NATO wouldn’t see through a nuclear strike from Belarus?

@philiprufus4427

11 ай бұрын

He's a homicidal maniac,like his hero, Stalin !

@virginiaoflaherty2983

9 ай бұрын

I don't think he was saying NATO wouldn't see through but that in spite of seeing through, some would seek a passive solution - as he implied when he mentioned Macron wanting to give Putin Ukraine in exchange for supposed peace solution early on. NATO needs to come on like Israel/ Mossad hurtling toward the bullets shot by their own guns.

Well said and Ukraine should be unbridled to attack any infrastructure in Russia - not civilians but any railway facilities, fuel storage and military facilities.

@krazytroutcatcher

11 ай бұрын

I’ll correct you, ‘Not just civilians’

@tonidimitrova6078

11 ай бұрын

We didn't think so when Al Qaeda struck the twin towers. Are we now ok if a nation we invaded fights back on OUR soil?

@bencarter1666

11 ай бұрын

@Richard Mangus Any actual threat to the Russian state and everyone involved gets atomised.. It's like wishing for your own death

@davidhess6593

11 ай бұрын

And Russia will just sit there and take it, right? Maybe Putin will say to Zelensky, "Thank you! May I have another?".

@worldbridger9

11 ай бұрын

It comes down to this, either russian infrastructure gets smashed or Poland and/or Lithuania get a nuke... hard call

Listening to this man is like listening to a children's story

@harrickvharrick3957

11 ай бұрын

Yeah, he's a horrible speaker. There's no body to his voice, there's no force behind it. One needs a veritable extra amplifier to get him cranked up to an audible level.. and to preserve one's own mental health one might also want to avoid looking at his face. It's a shade of grey that usually only shows on dead people..

@boloalain4082

11 ай бұрын

Quite disappointing I must say

@not.likely

11 ай бұрын

That's all you're capable of understanding, it's no wonder you were disappointed Try finishing primary school

@ndwandwewasendwedwe7964

11 ай бұрын

@@not.likely 🤣🤣🤣🤣 it got to you

@not.likely

11 ай бұрын

@@ndwandwewasendwedwe7964 I can't tolerate choldren

Very much enlightening.

Thank you

This is very important; I hope it gets very wide viewership. This is actually difficult to hear for two reasons: 1) the interviewee speaks so softly sometimes that it's almost impossible to understand him, and 2) the points of the interviewee reflect the insanity of the Russian government and Putin in particular; I think Putin is a dangerous, criminal psychopath. I think the interviewee speaks so softly because he's almost afraid to say these things loudly. Thanks so much for this interview!

@masan7452

11 ай бұрын

Agreed about putler being a psychopath. In fact all the traits of the dark triad can be found in the crazy bunker grandpa. 🇺🇸🗽

@rods5569

11 ай бұрын

"I think the interviewee speaks so softly because he's almost afraid to say these things loudly. " Or maybe his grandchild is having their nap nearby. It's not always something dramatic.

@manzajazz9025

11 ай бұрын

Watch it again with subtitles, they are not perfect, but good enough to understand what he says.

@whatthedeuce47d68

11 ай бұрын

​@@manzajazz9025 true but that rather defeats the purpose of trying to listen to it in any environment that is not sterile of noise, utterly frustrating.

@technobubba4

11 ай бұрын

Then turn OFF the "BOOM-BOX" !!

Times Radio, Why aren’t you capable of starting these videos at the beginning????????

@krapfantasy

11 ай бұрын

it's meant to be the "highlight" of the video, but it doesn't quite work, but they are Thirsty for views, and they think the clips help hook viewers.

@mahon257

11 ай бұрын

i think the idea is to give the viewer a 30 second summary, before starting the main content

@paladro

11 ай бұрын

@@mahon257 this guy knows

@frankk6416

11 ай бұрын

it's super annoying.

@mahon257

11 ай бұрын

perhaps they should add text "coming up...", current approach seems like lazy editing

Right on.

I really enjoy your historian host. He is so intellectually informed!! I love everything he says!! Thank you for this interview. I pray that he is wrong because a nuclear war cannot be won. God help us!! Thank You!!

@mgc7199

11 ай бұрын

The US is using NATO to drive a wedge between east and west, knowing that if Eurasia ever unites, the US's position in the unipolar world they created is lost. Allow me to explain: As it is the petrodollar that funds the US military and it is demand for this fiat currency that determines its value, the US needs to have resources traded in dollars in order to maintain the military strength that is above and beyond what any nation not benefitting from their currency being the world reserve currency has. Enter the proposed BRICS gold backed currency (to be decided in august): This coin is a serious threat to US hegemony because of the reasons above and is the driving factor for the US to promote war in Ukraine (where most of the pipelines that transport primary energy from east to west which would eventually need to be paid for in the new currency are) and to blow up the nordstream pipeline. Obviously getting Russia to appear to be the bad guy plays into their plans as well, whereas it is actually the US trying to push NATO east despite having promised to leave Russia with buffer states that was cause for Russia to take action.

Forward deployment of nuclear weapons is pretty much irrelevant. Makes no difference where the missiles are launched from.

@awuma

11 ай бұрын

There is less warning for anti-missile systems if launched closer to the target.

@RangerB66

11 ай бұрын

Not really; there is an entire layer of detection systems in place from the moment of launch to impact. Interception time would be the only issue, however it's not like the interceptors are able or set to intercept at any earlier point than when the missile enters friendly airspace.

@obi-ron

11 ай бұрын

The fact that the nuclear weapons are Russian is what would be the significant factor in any retaliation. Belorus would be considered as nothing more than a launch platform in much the same way as a Russian submarine two hundred miles off the coast of a target nation. Neutralising it would not be as important as making a retaliatory response at Moscow once missiles had launched unless it was believed that there were more waiting to go.

Yuri Felshtinsky's analysis of how the war is to end, is to attack Russian soil is absolute, as he points out there is no real threat to Russia and loss of life is irrelevant.

@mgc7199

11 ай бұрын

The US is using NATO to drive a wedge between east and west, knowing that if Eurasia ever unites, the US's position in the unipolar world they created is lost. Allow me to explain: As it is the petrodollar that funds the US military and it is demand for this fiat currency that determines its value, the US needs to have resources traded in dollars in order to maintain the military strength that is above and beyond what any nation not benefitting from their currency being the world reserve currency has. Enter the proposed BRICS gold backed currency (to be decided in august): This coin is a serious threat to US hegemony because of the reasons above and is the driving factor for the US to promote war in Ukraine (where most of the pipelines that transport primary energy from east to west which would eventually need to be paid for in the new currency are) and to blow up the nordstream pipeline. Obviously getting Russia to appear to be the bad guy plays into their plans as well, whereas it is actually the US trying to push NATO east despite having promised to leave Russia with buffer states that was cause for Russia to take action.

@bryandimery6509

11 ай бұрын

Yep. We all KNOW what a great idea it is to march on russia. DO IT!

@tosehoed123

11 ай бұрын

Yeah as if thats not the fast lane to nuclear war

@psymantronic1528

11 ай бұрын

😂

@javierfrancia1938

11 ай бұрын

NATO trained UAF has lost, conclusion: Russia has defeated NATO

He ended this discussion with a very scary prediction 😥. As human beings go, enjoy this year!

@not.likely

11 ай бұрын

But certainly a strong likelihood, if Putin loses this war, what will he face?

No more comfort zones for the aggressors. They must also feel the heat they stoked

@ja37d-34

11 ай бұрын

Yes.

@mgc7199

11 ай бұрын

The US is using NATO to drive a wedge between east and west, knowing that if Eurasia ever unites, the US's position in the unipolar world they created is lost. Allow me to explain: As it is the petrodollar that funds the US military and it is demand for this fiat currency that determines its value, the US needs to have resources traded in dollars in order to maintain the military strength that is above and beyond what any nation not benefitting from their currency being the world reserve currency has. Enter the proposed BRICS gold backed currency (to be decided in august): This coin is a serious threat to US hegemony because of the reasons above and is the driving factor for the US to promote war in Ukraine (where most of the pipelines that transport primary energy from east to west which would eventually need to be paid for in the new currency are) and to blow up the nordstream pipeline. Obviously getting Russia to appear to be the bad guy plays into their plans as well, whereas it is actually the US trying to push NATO east despite having promised to leave Russia with buffer states that was cause for Russia to take action.

It's good to see Ukraine conducting there special military operation in Russia,already though ay!

Agree about if the nukes will be used it will be from Belarus because Russia is to cowardly to fire them from the homeland.

@apveening

11 ай бұрын

Won't make any difference as everybody knows who will be responsible.

@timphillips9954

11 ай бұрын

In the same wau as the US would use it's nukes from a Nato member state in Europe.

best times radio interview ever, amazing insights..thankyou

@mgc7199

11 ай бұрын

The US is using NATO to drive a wedge between east and west, knowing that if Eurasia ever unites, the US's position in the unipolar world they created is lost. Allow me to explain: As it is the petrodollar that funds the US military and it is demand for this fiat currency that determines its value, the US needs to have resources traded in dollars in order to maintain the military strength that is above and beyond what any nation not benefitting from their currency being the world reserve currency has. Enter the proposed BRICS gold backed currency (to be decided in august): This coin is a serious threat to US hegemony because of the reasons above and is the driving factor for the US to promote war in Ukraine (where most of the pipelines that transport primary energy from east to west which would eventually need to be paid for in the new currency are) and to blow up the nordstream pipeline. Obviously getting Russia to appear to be the bad guy plays into their plans as well, whereas it is actually the US trying to push NATO east despite having promised to leave Russia with buffer states that was cause for Russia to take action.

Thanks to Yuri for his insights. Yuri is very knowledgeable and has shed lots of light on the complexity of this conflict in Ukraine which is highly likely to escalate and affect all of our lives

@eastern2687

11 ай бұрын

War, not conflict. It is war aggression and genocide. If you leave public comments, take time to also educate yourself and word it correctly

Well if mr Putin does that, he can kiss goodbye to Russia - BOOM!

@timphillips9954

11 ай бұрын

plus all of Western Europe and most of North America!

@The.Crawling.Chaos.

11 ай бұрын

@@timphillips9954 and the surrounding countries will all get the Fallout as well so they will declare war on whoever launched the warhead that affected their lands and there you have it, WW3. There won't much be much left for anyone other than the Penguins on the South pole. There will be radiation killing people all over the world. So no one should launch nukes. MAD

@Icenfyre

11 ай бұрын

@@timphillips9954 doubt that

Incredible! Incredible fantasy of Youri. Have fun with your mind, sir.

Excellent

Thank you Sir. 💛 and thank you Times Radio.

You know, just thinking out loud here, but it wouldn't take much to edit this: "Third: It shall be the policy of this Nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union."

@MidnightExpressMC

11 ай бұрын

Perfect! 👍

Finally…yes, moscow must be made to feel the war in their city

Time to end POOtins tyrannical regime. Victory to Ukraine Australia is with you 🇦🇺🇺🇦🇦🇺🇺🇦🇦🇺🇺🇦

@aceofspades5786

11 ай бұрын

AUS military here in UK bases training UA

@phillmckill5562

11 ай бұрын

@@aceofspades5786 I know and we are very impressed at how good the Ukrainians are going they are no push over that's for sure ruZZia hasn't got a chance🇺🇦🇦🇺🇬🇧

This is terrifying, especially given his unique perspective. I hope and pray that he is completely incorrect.

All of Ukraine is easily in range of Russian tactical nukes from where they were originally positioned. Russia moving its tactical nukes into Belarus is yet more sabre rattling.

@jonconnington8987

11 ай бұрын

No different than European countries like Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Italy holding American nukes in their country.. but it's ok when we the west do it.

@macmcleod1188

11 ай бұрын

They have played the nuclear card until it is in tatters . They don't seem to understand that we literally can't allow nuclear weapons to be combined with invasion. It would make future nuclear war much more likely if we did.

@apveening

11 ай бұрын

And it doesn't really change anything, the prevailing winds from Ukraine will still blow the fall-out straight back to Moscow.

@TedATL1

11 ай бұрын

But the man said they will be launched at Lithuania and Poland from Belarus. He further said Putin could do this from Kaliningrad, but he wants any retaliation to be against Belarus not Russian territory.

@technobubba4

11 ай бұрын

The counter should be to give Tactical Nukes to Ukraine !! ( along w. F-16's to deliver em )

The US DOD has messaged Putin that use of even tactical nuclear weapons that it would mean a personal existential threat to Putin. Former Amb Bolton (not a part of the current government) said the same thing also publicly. If the death of a dictator is required, Americans are pragmatic enough to do the job.

@KameraShy

11 ай бұрын

Makes me wonder if US actually wants pootin to remain, versus a sudden chaos in ruzzia. Very capable assassins, with access, can be had - for a price.

True, Putin doesn't care how many Belarusians or indeed Russians perish in the war which he started, but he most definitely cares about the survivability of his own regime. Any use of tactical nuclear weapons would directly imperil Putin and his government, and he would quite literally be toast should he decide to go the strategic route. In other words, Putin can do this the hard way or he can do this the HARD way.

@stephaniemurria5534

11 ай бұрын

Absolutely 💯

@apostle100

11 ай бұрын

Hahahaha. I love the cope and cognitive dissonance involved in trying to concoct a lose lose situation for Putin. If NATO was that sure they could easily beat Russia they would've installed a no fly zone long ago at the beginning of the war like Ukraine literally begged for and sent in NATO troops long time ago. The fact that this is existential for Russia and not NATO or the US gives the west pause, because Ukraine isn't necessary for the west's security but keeping Ukraine neutral is for Russia's. You see Ukraine isn't the hill the US wants to die on....but for Russia it's existential since it's right on it's border, so all this braggadocio and pontificating is laughable. "Oh this will imperil Putin and that will imperil Putin so Putin loses either way" is just some bullsht people who can't stand that fact that despite all their efforts Russia is attriting Ukraine, say. Russia would quicker nuke Ukraine than allow it to become a NATO member on Russian land, and if you think the US self preservation instinct is so low that it would risk its own destruction to avenge Ukraine, then you're dumber than Elensky.

@JUANO510

11 ай бұрын

To me Putin knows Ukraine can't win and he's just taking his time. I feel once the Americans get tired of sending money over and over, it'll stop and Europe will be forced to pay this. Ukraine is getting slaughtered and those poor ppl are being kidnapped off of the street and forced to fight smh so evil

@mgc7199

11 ай бұрын

The US is using NATO to drive a wedge between east and west, knowing that if Eurasia ever unites, the US's position in the unipolar world they created is lost. Allow me to explain: As it is the petrodollar that funds the US military and it is demand for this fiat currency that determines its value, the US needs to have resources traded in dollars in order to maintain the military strength that is above and beyond what any nation not benefitting from their currency being the world reserve currency has. Enter the proposed BRICS gold backed currency (to be decided in august): This coin is a serious threat to US hegemony because of the reasons above and is the driving factor for the US to promote war in Ukraine (where most of the pipelines that transport primary energy from east to west which would eventually need to be paid for in the new currency are) and to blow up the nordstream pipeline. Obviously getting Russia to appear to be the bad guy plays into their plans as well, whereas it is actually the US trying to push NATO east despite having promised to leave Russia with buffer states that was cause for Russia to take action.

@bencarter1666

11 ай бұрын

He'll do either ultimately, push comes to shove..

The Times Radio should get comment on this interview from Jonathan of Silicon Curtain and Perun, the man who every week delivers detailed analysis of this war.

"FSB runs the country. First time in history this has happened. They don't care how many Russians or other are killed". This is a very insightful video and really provides value to understanding how we got here and what the world is dealing with.

@islandercirce2

11 ай бұрын

That observation about the FSB running the country really made me stop. If that's true, Putin's departure from leadership would change nothing. How would NATO (or anyone else) change the attitude of the FSB about the war? I can only hope he's not totally correct about that but I don't have enough knowledge or understanding about the situation.

@javierfrancia1938

11 ай бұрын

NATO trained UAF has lost, conclusion: Russia has defeated NATO

@bluemarlin8138

11 ай бұрын

Maybe, but they do care about themselves and probably their families and close friends. If they start a nuclear war, then they and those people they do care about will die too. No bunker on Earth would survive NATO’s retaliation against Ruzzia.

@philiprufus4427

11 ай бұрын

Cheka, GPU, N K V D,KGB, now the FSB you could not write it. Oskar Dirlwanger would have loved these guys. He recruited loadsa Russians,they shot first asked questions later,then shot again.

@jeffreyd508

10 ай бұрын

Its wild how putin loves russia, but cares nothing for russian people

If NATO wants to end the war, then hopefully we can start peace negotiations. Thank you for making sense.

We have to take down Russia so that we can focus our energies on the real threat, China. Having Russia as a threat in the background is a complication that we really don't need. But we must not forget about the threat from China.

@87gn199

11 ай бұрын

Jim types furously the propoganda fed to him as he sits in underwear made in china, a chair made in china and a phone made in china.

@chrisdeason4904

11 ай бұрын

So endless wars are the answer for whom do you work?

@gusmarokity6482

11 ай бұрын

What is a China threat evidence ?

@normanmw0hjgmw0hjg28

11 ай бұрын

Have you been to China ??

@vincenthigginbotham8729

10 ай бұрын

China is a threat but first it will be for Russia and if it controls Russia it will quite down for decades

He should said that it would be the end of Putin

@RobertHempazPhDTrichometry

11 ай бұрын

#PMC-Wagner must offer to negotiate with the #FRP (`Free Russia Partisans`) … #Yev-geny must suggest they combine forces to secure #25 Staraya Square from further cruise missile attacks else demise of #PMC-Wagner Group is assured. #RazPutin-flees-Moscow!, #Prigo-zhin-In! … “The soil cannot hold him!” ~ Mother #Ukraine

@cryptofan8625

11 ай бұрын

it will never be the end of putin keep on dreaming

YUri is 100 % correct. The only people who did not see it are those who don't want to see it because it doesn't suit them to do so for financial, political, or fear as reasons.

@sharonlavery7656

11 ай бұрын

Like Musk who wants the west to keep its ties to China in place....!?

I've had that feeling. I don't believe Russia is willing to loose at all cost.

@henrihoya6349

11 ай бұрын

What 👀

Thank you Times Radio Excellent, unsettling, frightening are just some of the adjectives I would use to describe this interview. I was hanging on every word. Kudos to the interviewer for allowing Felshtinsky to speak at his own pace without unnecessary interruption.

@sasaz6084

11 ай бұрын

Can she invite Douglas Mcggregor too??

The NATO/OTAN should say in short time: "Now it's over, now it's done. Russia withdraw or....."

@superhumantrueman

11 ай бұрын

@@s0ycapitan Then they are dumber than they look and act.

@tonupharry

11 ай бұрын

Nato will hit Ruzzia so suddenly and so hard . The idea that we would only hit Belarus is ludicrous . Ruzzians think everyone has the mental age of Five

@neutralevil1917

11 ай бұрын

You've got no guts to touch even Kim with his few nukes, let alone the owner of the biggest nuclear arsenal on Earth

@harrymcghee282

11 ай бұрын

"Or else What" ????????????????? US - HATO - EU as Stoltenberg has Confessed Now a Dozen times over the last Three Months "STARTED" The War Against "Russia" in 2014 by getting Their Proxy Na$is to Slaughter Their Own (Then) Peoples in Donetsk - Luhansk - Odessa and All the Donbas and they have "NO" Chance because they will have to Declare Outright War against Russia and "ALL" Her Allies plus Every Country that has been Destroyed through or by US-HATO I Hope will Exact Revenge All over the Middle East - then the Whole of Africa and Latin America Slava Russia fae Scotland

@zeanu2015

11 ай бұрын

if NATO could've intervened they would've but they can't, they're not strong enough, they're scare when countries are weak they attack like ex-youslavia, Libya but Russia hates them, love them they can destroy the earth

Alas, I think that he is correct. This is a good hill on which to die.

Well that was encouraging.

His optimism is infectious

@javierfrancia1938

11 ай бұрын

NATO trained UAF has lost, conclusion: Russia has defeated NATO

Yuri talks a lot but had nothing new or interesting to offer. We heard it all before. NATO needs to step up and confront Putin once and for all

@petardetar5191

11 ай бұрын

How Europe sees the Ukraine War Now - Alastair Crooke fmr Brit Ambassador

I believe Ukraine can do it 🙏

This is one of the most interesting interviews i have seen on the Russians

thank you, as always, very thoughtful discussion;

Yes, im afraid we will need to step in and the battlefield is being prepared with western weapons for that moment 😮.

@MB-wr6ib

11 ай бұрын

I like how you say 'we' as if you're going to be the one on the battlefield

@davieodell9369

11 ай бұрын

"We"🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣, why are you not there already coward.

Great interview. Keep up with the excellent work. Very appreciated.

THE HEADLINE SAYS IT ALL ... GET IT DONE

I don't think NATO can stop Russian if they start with nuclear weapons

Listen up the West and NATO, don’t get caught with your pants down! 🇷🇺

@The.Crawling.Chaos.

11 ай бұрын

Good Putin bot. You should pray that Russia does not launch nukes against a nato country.

Can Yuri tell us about Minsk 1 & 2, and why it was not enforced. Maybe we would not have a war on now.

@rayjay5836

11 ай бұрын

How about the Budapest Memorandum, agreements mean nothing.

@susanpotter9720

11 ай бұрын

I think it's all gone beyond the paperwork stage ...there is no turning back to stop this war Ukraine has to win...China awaits .

The Times is on the Take!

Strategic nuclear weapons are such because they are launched between continents. Saying their placement close to NATO borders is relevant is a fundamental misunderstanding of what these weapons actually do, which is to go into orbit, which means they can hit anywhere on earth.

@andyhowells1141

11 ай бұрын

And what about the Landmines on the perimeter of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Station Cooling Ponds ?

@Mr_Rob_otto

11 ай бұрын

He must have meant tactical nuclear weapons instead of strategic, as that makes much more sense.

@awuma

11 ай бұрын

He wasn't explcit enough, but what he was talking about are intermediate-range ballistic and cruise missiles delivering warheads, say over 150 to 1500 miles. In this war, they seem to be mainly air and sea launched. Less than that are tactical weapons, e.g. artillery shells, and longer than that are strategic weapons.

@lucemiserlohn

11 ай бұрын

Tactical weapons are designed to win battles; strategic weapons are designed to end wars. It is not a measure of the reach or the yield of the bomb, but the it is used and towards which end.

@aries6776

11 ай бұрын

No you are missing a big factor. The Kola Peninsula where pretty much all of Russia western pointing ICBM's are located are now bordered by NATO. This means a rapid surgical NATO strike force to pre-emptively take out all of those missile bases is far more feasible. You can bet NATO have been war-gaming such a scenario for many decades but Finland were always strictly neural. Putin has effectively checkmated himself. Finland joining NATO is the single biggest event in the security of Western Europe since WW2 ended.

Thank you for this illuminating interview......but I hope Yuri is wrong. About the nukes, I mean.

@greatspottedwoodpeck

11 ай бұрын

Don't worry. He is.

@mikeberray

11 ай бұрын

there is a video on KZread about what would happen if there was a nuclear war. Basically we would all die..... eventually.

This is pure madness

@deltavee2

11 ай бұрын

Definition of war....

Yes I agree that NATO must act and bring this war to a close they have the men the munitions and the will so get on with it and end this criminal regime.

Doesn’t matter if a Russian nuke gets launched from a sub or from another country. Moscow and St Petersburgh would be the first strike back targets. As for tactical nukes, these have the same yield as the nukes used against Japan in WW2.

@Hubertuszczynski

11 ай бұрын

Really? Tactical have same power as Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombs? How stronger are strategic ones?

@feet_first

11 ай бұрын

@@Hubertuszczynski 10 000x

@Brian-om2hh

11 ай бұрын

@@Hubertuszczynski You really don't want to know. It's unthinkable..... This underlines the utter lunacy of having thousands of nuclear warheads. The whole World would be in complete chaos after just a handful of nuclear detonations....

@deltavee2

11 ай бұрын

@@Hubertuszczynski Look up hydrogen bombs vs Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs. While you're at it, look up high altitude EMP strikes.

@tomislav5689

11 ай бұрын

There are much smaller tactical nukes then these against Japan. Smallest one (can be put in a backpack) having yield of "only" 10 tones of TNT (something like 5x Beirut explosion). *edited: TNT equivalent yield correction

If someone is whispering can we ask them to speak up or you all can turn their volume up? I love you guys and I watch several vids a day from The States, but sometimes the disparity in volume from the host and the guest is too much. And the man speaks great English, but he does have an accent. It doesn't have to be LOUD but it must be Audible. Just a suggestion.

A thought provoking discussion, perhaps a very dark future ahead.

Like you Mr Feltshtinsky, I hope God steps in before millions are killed and madero suffer. 🙏 God bless all 🙏

Who in his right mind would think , that nuke where launched from Belarus, Russia are really thinking that Nato will not hold them accountable so funny.....

@rodmarker2071

11 ай бұрын

No one , except a Russian braine wiped by propaganda

@paulzink2492

11 ай бұрын

I don't think he will eighther but he's thinking about it.

Appreciate the interview. Interesting perspectives!

I'm not in Nato yet but soon i will be joining the party, i'm up for ending Putins Russia if anyone else is.

I'm impressed by this commentary.

There must be consequences!!!

He also forgets the initial attack in 2020 came from Belarus. That country is already compromised.

Ukraine is fighting a war with one arm tied behind their back unfair.

Russia must be put to an end.

Russia strategy is if Russia cannot have Ukraine then no one can have Ukraine

Notice his distinction between saying, "Ukraine cannot win this war unless they can attack Moscow" and "but I'm not saying that Ukraine should attack Moscow" because I don't want to be thrown out of hotel window!!!

@mgc7199

11 ай бұрын

The US is using NATO to drive a wedge between east and west, knowing that if Eurasia ever unites, the US's position in the unipolar world they created is lost. Allow me to explain: As it is the petrodollar that funds the US military and it is demand for this fiat currency that determines its value, the US needs to have resources traded in dollars in order to maintain the military strength that is above and beyond what any nation not benefitting from their currency being the world reserve currency has. Enter the proposed BRICS gold backed currency (to be decided in august): This coin is a serious threat to US hegemony because of the reasons above and is the driving factor for the US to promote war in Ukraine (where most of the pipelines that transport primary energy from east to west which would eventually need to be paid for in the new currency are) and to blow up the nordstream pipeline. Obviously getting Russia to appear to be the bad guy plays into their plans as well, whereas it is actually the US trying to push NATO east despite having promised to leave Russia with buffer states that was cause for Russia to take action.

@Brian-om2hh

11 ай бұрын

Wise man.....

I don't understand why NATO expansion again on Russia boards...why not UN because they are the peace 🕊️

Take us to the bridge!🔥

I wouldn’t be surprised if Russia’s nuclear arsenal is outdated too! 35:04

@sharonlavery7656

11 ай бұрын

It would be brilliant if Russia tried to send a nuke and it blew up underground in Russia 😂😂😂😂😂 good enough outcome 😊

Unless the West is overwhelmingly strong and determined, I fear the doctor could be right.

@alanrobertson9790

11 ай бұрын

Agreed. Russia cannot beat NATO but Western public opinion could.

Well it's been a good run everybody. Will the last human left alive please shut the light off.

Good interview

We always have a choice.