I love that we can watch the entire documentary for free. This is how the academic world is supposed to function - the free exchange of ideas, honest scientific inquiry, and the search for knowledge.

@flybylightmedia

3 ай бұрын

100% agree. Got to laugh at a “scientific” community that is incapable of admitting their pet theory has long since outlived any plausible hope of support by physical evidence. 😂 God bless their darling hearts…

@titaniumspecial4207

3 ай бұрын

What have you done for others?

@GilGTG

3 ай бұрын

I love that misinformation is free.

@michaelg377

3 ай бұрын

@@GilGTG Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people? This information isn't free, it's funded by tax payers and force fed to us for "free", and we are all uncritically indoctrinated into this atheistic origins mythology as young children. It's even in our cartoons and children's stories.

@megan1010ify

3 ай бұрын

I plan on purchasing the documentary on DVD. Nothing is free. It wasn't free for these people to make this film. People deserve to be paid for their work and their knowledge, which can take decades to acquire. We should be willing to pay for their expertise.

My wife and I have a small 10 acre farm. We grow many fruits and vegetables and flowers. There is no way that someone with eyes and an open mind not be able to see the hand of GOD in all the beauty and complexity of life whether plant or animal. Each plant has a relationship with the bugs and the roots of such plants with the bacteria in the soil. I could go on for hours but I'll just cut it short and say thank you my heavenly Father and to GOD be the glory.

@markvonwisco7369

4 жыл бұрын

Those various organisms have a symbiotic relationship because they co-evolved with one another over millions of years. No god needed at all to explain how nature functions.

@josh2388

4 жыл бұрын

William Elliott Why did you capitalize GOD? Similar to IN GOD WE TRUST on dollar bill? Get back to your lodge...

@firecloud77

4 жыл бұрын

"We are surrounded by a world of incredible complexity, and beauty actually. And everything about the living world screams design. If you look at the way a body works, look at the way a body of any animal or any plant works -- it's clearly designed, you might think." --Richard Dawkins

@williamelliott

4 жыл бұрын

@@josh2388 the one true GOD. Creater of all things deserves capitals.

@stanstevens6289

4 жыл бұрын

@Rebecca P Yeah, like the Corona virus.

My wife and I like this presentation so much that we have watched it many times .

@unclecharliesunholyworldof7145

Ай бұрын

Me and my wife give each other sloppy toppy twice a week to it. In the name of the Lord.

Brilliant documentary- without all the lies, the world makes sense. The Almighty is the creator of all - I am in awe and praise. Thank you 🙏

@DIRTY-4PLAY

2 ай бұрын

Religion is a lie, there is no proof of gods

In the end, it matters more where I'm headed. Believing in God's history is a choice we've been given. I chose to believe and spend an eternity with my Lord and Savior. See ya there!

@AuntNutmeg

2 жыл бұрын

@Boz Scaggs You are literally living surrounded by the evidence you seek. Your thinking causes you to ignore it and explain it away with other explanations. Ask God to open your eyes to the truth.

@AuntNutmeg

2 жыл бұрын

@Boz Scaggs The real world you live in was created by God. The reason you live in an ordered world, with laws like gravity you can depend upon, is because God is a God of order. Your very existence depends upon His willingness to allow you to continue to exist despite your scoffing at His existence.

@AuntNutmeg

2 жыл бұрын

@Boz Scaggs Have you watched the video, or just commented below it?

@AuntNutmeg

2 жыл бұрын

@Boz Scaggs It is/was news world wide! The book you refuse to read is the international best seller every year. Where is the proof it was changed substantially?

@AuntNutmeg

2 жыл бұрын

@Boz Scaggs Actually, the NYT took the Bible off their bestseller list because it would win every time. Yes, all belief requires faith, including belief in evolution. The origin of the universe cannot be repeated, therefore it cannot be tested as observational science can be. We'd have to have an eyewitness testify as to what happened.

Couldn't get to sleep & found this last night. I really loved it! So many scientific people explaining it. Now if i could just get some others to take a look at this explanation rather than just listening to the popular view point.

@mountainhours4443

10 ай бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Oh boy! I hate to be the bearer of bad news Nicholas but here is Evidence for young Earth; Most dating methods gives a young world. Helium in atmosphere, Helium in ground, Meteor dust, Buildup of carbon 14, Human population, Natural plutonium, Sodium in sea, Sediment in sea, Erosion of continents, Earth's magnetic field, Oil leaks in earth, Natural gas in earth, Orphan radiohalos, Decay of rock magnetism, Tight bends in rocks, Coral reef growth, Oldest living plants, Human civilizations, River delta growth, Undersea oil seepage, Uranium in sea, Rotation of spiral galaxies, Decay of comets, Dust on the moon, Slowing of earth's rotation, Heat loss from earth, Niagara Falls erosion and many more. Billions of years is story telling.

@mountainhours4443

10 ай бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Also there is no such thing as evolution (No evidence for it). You continue to lie to the students with no science to back it up.

@mountainhours4443

10 ай бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Provide evidence for evolution. I know you can not do it as there is none. All talk and no action. Good Luck!

@mountainhours4443

10 ай бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Just as I thought, NOTHING! You are a liar.

@mountainhours4443

10 ай бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Still Nothing?

This documentary has changed my husband's belief! Thank you for making this documentary and posting this on youtube. My husband didn't believe in God and didn't believe there was a creator all his life until he watched this documentary in 2021. He was lead to research about God after his employer decided to have a vaccine mandate to all their employees but gave religious exemptions. After watching this documentary, my husband claimed religious exemption and in his letter to his employee, he declared that there is a God who gave him his immune system and is good enough to fight any virus. Thank God he got the religious exemption from getting the vaccine! Keep up the good fight Is Genesis History team and God bless! We've purchased the movie and have been sharing this movie with family and friends.

@psalm91allthyways

Ай бұрын

I Love this testimony! Praise the LORD! God bless you & your husband!!!!!

@jonathanlucas3604

29 күн бұрын

Humanity has worked a long time without divine help to rid ourselves of the worst diseases imaginable: polio, smallpox, measles, mumps, rubella, rsv, flu, diptheria, tetanus, and many more. I hope your husband doesn't have to learn by experience what humanity has had to learn. That being said, I have a deep and abiding hatred for anti vaxxers.

This host reminds me a lot of Mike Row...he is very attentive to each of the interviewees and contributes to the conversation in a meaningful way. Great documentary. Thank you❤

@markwildt5728

4 ай бұрын

That's called reading from a script... But yes, it was well done.

I am a geologist in Colorado. You can see the Great Unconformity here in several places. I remember, as a student at CU Boulder, all my professors clearly stated that no one knows why the Great Unconformity exists. It’s b/c they re viewing it from a secular worldview.

@keithb4604

4 жыл бұрын

Please explain what is the great unconformity

@steve-oh4342

3 жыл бұрын

@@spicyroads unbiased? Oh the irony.

@billcat1840

3 жыл бұрын

Do you see large boulders embedded in mudflow rocks? some of them are incredibly massive. It took alot of water to throw them around

@kimbanton4398

3 жыл бұрын

@@spicyroads secular is the opposite of unbiased

@sean748

Жыл бұрын

Any scientist unwilling to declare that they do not know is not worth your time. Science is inductive - it can only ever disprove falsities.

" (A)Paradigm ( has been) imposed on the data rather the the data providing the paradigm". Makes sense.

@nicholaseaves2591

2 жыл бұрын

That's literally what christians do with science. They have a narrative paradigm established by the bible and their faith and then cherry pick evidence to support their claims and ignore the evidence that refutes them. I work with a seventh day Adventist that believes in "biblical science" and we get into arguments all the time that end with him throwing up his hands saying "That's what i believe and nothing will change it!". That is the complete opposite of the scientific method

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicholaseaves2591 Mr. eaves, that's literally what atheists do with science as well. It's a matter of competing worldview interpretations over the exact same evidence, the difference is that atheistic-Naturalism is demonstrably internally inconsistent, it has an embarrassing history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, it can't explain foundational things that it ought to be able to explain, and it is not existentially viable (ie. you can't live it out in reality). We already discussed how atheistic-Naturalists believe in Supernatural phenomena (and you tried to say that pre-existence is "natural" - God is pre-existent)... you know, for all your anti-God assertions, you sure do suspiciously live perfectly in line with everything He said about you. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed. This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview. You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15) "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)

@HS-zk5nn

2 жыл бұрын

it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because ... science.

@nicholaseaves2591

2 жыл бұрын

@@michael9237 the religious answer has no explanatory mechanism. Intelligent design can't be tested. It's not even close to comparable with scientific theory

@nicholaseaves2591

2 жыл бұрын

@@michael9237 btw, im not going to reply to all the assertions in your novel of a comment. Try to be more concise. This is a youtube comment thread. Not a college dissertation

I bought the whole series for my brother who's a Christian but oddly believes in evolution too. He's a college graduate I am not, so hopefully these men can speak more on his level. When we discuss this issue all I can answer with is "because God said so" which is good enough for me but doesn't satisfy him. Being a female I learned my lesson from Eve if God said it's TRUE.. Genesis 3.

@michaelg377

7 ай бұрын

@@kimhoffmannandersen5477 Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *Time* then puddles of chemicals can turn themselves into people?

@porcelainish

2 ай бұрын

it does save thinking for yourself doesn't it?

@13:37, having been through typhoon haiyan in 2013 and been in the middle of a storm surge, believe me, one would not doubt the power and scale and how quickly water can change a landscape. 😐 definitely, lots and lots of water in a short amount of time. Made me think, 'This must be a glimpse into the great flood in Noah's time...' Dare i say, even the winds sounded like angels on chariots.

There is two ways to live your life, One way is to live as if there are no miracles, The other way is to live as everything is a miracle.

@vivians9392

3 жыл бұрын

The whole universe and everything in it is a miracle!

@larrynickel2807

3 жыл бұрын

(quoted from Einstein)

@keyboarddancers7751

3 жыл бұрын

There ARE two ways...

@DrDrakesr

3 жыл бұрын

Best Answer

@YDDES

3 жыл бұрын

If we start to believe in ”miracles”, we can never be sure of anything. Just anything can happen any time.

This is the best creationist program I have ever watched. It was wonderfully done and truly glorifies God. All creation was meant to praise the Lord, and this program just shows how amazing He is! I will most definitely recommend people watch it.

@KristerAndersson-nc8zo

3 жыл бұрын

So they lie and you admire them for it.

@zac3392

3 жыл бұрын

Krister Andersson Hi! I’m interested in inaccuracies, could you point a few out, please? Thanks!

@guiagaston7273

3 жыл бұрын

@D.C. a visit to you local middle school will clear be enough to debunk a whole lot of these lies.

@STMYL2525

3 жыл бұрын

Guia Gaston if they couldn’t comprehend it the first time I doubt it will work the second time. They want to believe this flawed opinion based video instead of you know real science.

@bull010163

3 жыл бұрын

Josh Jordison And lies through its teeth. If there was concrete evidence of a god, any of them, it would have been produced by now. However none is forthcoming. We are supposed to believe in myth and hearsay. I prefer solid scientific evidence. We don’t have all the answers yet, but the bible has had to reinterpreted so many times as science moves forward, it makes the bible pointless and irrelevant.

I'm really glad this is up for free, when my pastor showed clips in church I was not yet saved, and rocks, fossils, biology, are all sciences that have peaked my interest, and I have a hard time seeing things and answering things without a secular evolutionist view.

Wow, I'm thoroughly impressed! The effort and creativity you've put into this video really shine through. Can't wait to see more!

@IsGenesisHistory

5 ай бұрын

Thank you @Biblical_Mystery! There is much more to come!

@The-Butcher-Jaegerkorpset

5 ай бұрын

This is laughable to anybody with a proper education in the sciences and geology.

@michaelg377

5 ай бұрын

@@The-Butcher-Jaegerkorpset Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance if you just wait a long enough *time,* and that planets can randomly clump together to meet 122 precise anthropic constants (conditions required for life) - a 1 in 10^138 probability - from a "Big Bang" by chance? Science is a methodology. What you're talking about is an Ideology, and I just don't have enough faith to believe that these unscientific beliefs happened by chance, never mind the many scientific problems with them. *"The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse"* (Romans 1:20)

@lindafras1762

3 ай бұрын

I Thank YOU All" SO Much", For That Christian program Of (GENESIS History"!). The only Things). They didn't talk about Was THE Many "Earthquakes". Of "THAT'S HAPPENED"😳." THROUGHOUT The Many HUNDREDS OF YEARS".

@user-gl4fq7jt9p

2 ай бұрын

@@The-Butcher-Jaegerkorpset okay my bulle, gaan huil by jou ma.

Everything old is new again... amazing how science of old can be explained to be a newer occurrence by the explanation of layers of earth being formed by water, heat and cooling with the water subsiding, retreating, and not taking an extreme amount of time such as millions or more of years to do so in a miniscule amount of time compared to that being anywhere from a mere generation to just a few generations. Incredible!

@adelinomorte7421

2 ай бұрын

***universal time is not the same as our "clock time"***

I too suppressed between my spiritual experiences and what appeared as lapses in scripture yet having faith that God is true. Then I began to learn of these truths in an apologetics class. It is the calming balm in these days of uncertainty. For there is one certainty - God is.

@matthewbennier7476

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, He found me in His written word June 18th last year. God is good.

@TMPreRaff

3 жыл бұрын

ZZzzz.... ZZzzz.... ZZzzz.... ZZzzz....

@mimilights

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed❤️✝️❤️

@danite1742

2 жыл бұрын

@Jimbo Bell We collectively are God my friend. We are the only creatures on earth that can combine information into formulating new ideas. We also have the ability to heal ourselves and have supernatural abilities just like "Ice Man".

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

Here is another piece of evidence that I hope you find useful, from one Christian to another: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.

Thank you for putting out this beautiful film and for FREE! Glory be to God, God bless.

The find in Hell creek from the Maastrichtian, late Cretaceous (circa 67-66 million years ago), the intact brow horn from a Triceratops sp. in fine state of preservation, boasting a furrowed texture from the root to the terminal point, with tissue and pristine protein is mind blowing

@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth

3 ай бұрын

But it's not 67 million old

@Sh4rtL0rd

Ай бұрын

@@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth It's thousands of years old.

A must see presentation for all who love the subject on Bible Science and Creation.

@rebsince71

Жыл бұрын

Nicholas, everyone in this film, including the host, is doctorate level educated. Which science are you referring to?…Everyone, including those scientists you choose to agree with, are giving opinions. They’re giving hypotheses. Carbon dating, at best, is highly inaccurate and unreliable. No one, including those scientists 200 years ago, was around to validate any claims. This representation, to me, has indeed met the standard to be given consideration.

@ChristEnlightenment

Жыл бұрын

@Nicholas Christie-Blick you aren't a good scientist you actually believe in fairy tales and lies, I'm sorry for your lack of faith, and also hate for Christianity and God, you must be a big sinner

@GAMER123GAMING

10 ай бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 "They are contradicted by things we learnt" or false narratives that are pushed? No... no... cant quesiton things

I know my experience is only anecdotal but I once watched a very strong flash flood cut away a swath of earth at least 20 feet deep and a half mile long of what had previously been solid rock. Rushing water is incredibly strong and once rocks get mixed with it, even solid granite rock walls are ripped away by the force. This happened in New Mexico during the summer monsoons late 1980's. It all happened in about a half hour. I remember walking out into the gorge it left. The landscape was completely changed - gone in fact. It was a place where my young wife and I often walked our dog and I also remember joking with my wife that I wonder if this how the grand canyon was formed and we laughed and said maybe it took only a couple of years and not billions. I actually think the instantaneous force of water is a more credible explanation for the Grand Canyon then the slow erosion of billions of years.

@rickkwitkoski1976

4 жыл бұрын

Have you ever BEEN to the Grand Canyon!!! It is NOT composed of unconsolidated till like shown in this video. The rocks (ROCKS not soil!) are different layers of differing hardness and types that contain embedded fossils that can be seen to be of a specific type in each layer. There are several places where the planes of the sedimentary rock are tilted to extreme angles as well. NOT the result of a quick outflow of debris material but rather a slow sedimentation process that shows that different types of material were laid down at different times. ALSO the bottom of the canyon cuts through many hundreds of feet of very hard IGNEOUS rock! Rock that was molten and then solidified underground. This guy's equating of his little stream and erosion gully to the Grand Canyon is completely ludicrous! Rather than finding someone who supports your pre-conceived ideas and conclusion, why don't you look at the actual evidence first! Understand the parameters that must have existed before the Grand Canyon could have been cut and then get a real and actual conclusion. You obviously have no background in soil geology, rock geology, hydraulic physics, paleontology, geomorphology or any credible science discipline. Grand Canyon's rough dimensions: 1 mile deep, 10 miles wide, 100 miles long. Through SOLID ROCK!

@mde6955

4 жыл бұрын

@ megaterang- least 20 feet deep and a half mile long. Multiple that by 10,000 feet at least. Open mindedness. Global not county. Watch the video. If you did you closed your hearing!

@dlighted7643

4 жыл бұрын

megaterang yeah, a global flood! Duh! It only makes sense. I’ve thought about this for a long time. It’s actually annoying how dumb smart people can be. Forgive them God. Strengthen us to love them!

@rossrosco4544

4 жыл бұрын

@@jimmyray5524 Hundreds of Creationist scientists have changed their minds. None of the millions of other scientists have. Why would that be ?????

@BibleResearchTools

4 жыл бұрын

Ross Rosco , you wrote, "Hundreds of Creationist scientists have changed their minds. None of the millions of other scientists have. Why would that be ?????" None? You must live in a cave. I believed in evolution until I was in my 60's. An examination of the geologic column converted me. There is no way those thick, homogeneous, uneroded, unbioturbated sedimentary rock layers were gradually deposited. A global flood is the only thing that makes scientific sense. Dan

I am watching this for maybe the 10th time. It affirms the truth of our Bible. You have shown the verse in the Bible where we are told to look to the rocks; Amazing!

There is a whole lot of effort and research put into this work, and apart from all the evidence, different theories about the Genesis paradigm. change a lot of what I have studied until now. Tons of appreciation, this is not just great but incredible work. Hats off!

@douglaspearce1187

7 ай бұрын

What evidence?

@twocyclediesel1280

6 ай бұрын

Evidence? We’re waiting nicely

@nickma71

5 ай бұрын

@@douglaspearce1187 Did you miss the part about the sedimentary layers and marine life? How about fossils? They shouldn't exist, they will just decompose, unless they are buried rapidly.

@richardmatatahi4563

4 ай бұрын

This seems to be an attempt to use scientific facts to involve religious beliefs and failing. The ice age is known now to come in cycles, flooding also is no stranger, Heatwave, Tsunamis, Earthquakes ain't divine intervention.

@brandonbogert7848

4 ай бұрын

@@douglaspearce1187 Watch the video again. What’s your evidence? I like historical evidence like the 200 stories of a worldwide flood for one.

Your ministry was a major reason of me coming to Christ. I couldn’t justbelieve, I had to know.

@Gamefan86

Жыл бұрын

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens. Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun. Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info. .. .. . .. ..

@Gamefan86

Жыл бұрын

@JESUS slaves, it's a shame none of it is true.

@JESUSSavesWAKEUP

Жыл бұрын

@@Gamefan86 behind me Satan! I researched it all and found the Truth. I won’t give you counterarguments because you won’t read them but continue searching the Truth and you will find it.

@JESUSSavesWAKEUP

Жыл бұрын

I know you will come back here someday and say you found Jesus. Because all that search for Truth sincerely will find it. Meanwhile I’m praying for you

So thankful you guys invested so much of your time, energy and money to make this fascinating documentary. Thanks so much for making it available on KZread!

@rogerhector5885

3 жыл бұрын

i agree fascinating

@miketomlin6040

3 жыл бұрын

It's more fascinating how in 2020, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary- including the fact homo sapiens behave almost exactly the same as Monkeys - there are still some people who believe Bible stories!

@elviahernandez3313

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly 😩

@sathviksidd

3 жыл бұрын

@@miketomlin6040 atleast better than believing there is no right or wrong and there is no meaning to life and no reason to do science

@miketomlin6040

3 жыл бұрын

@@sathviksidd I don't understand your comment?

1:26... If we see the spirals of the galaxies which are 2 million years away from us, then we receive a 2 million year old picture. The galaxy in reality is much different than we see now. That's clear as water. In 2 million years we will see how it looks today.

*Creationist definition of "KINDS"* The short answer is: *They do not have a definition*. "Kinds" was invented by creationists, because they could never fit the millions of species on the Ark. Creationists will often claim that they are not interested in the species level, though. Initially, creationism did require fixity of species. In the 1920s, when George McCready Price equated "species" to the biblical "kinds", however if you ask any creationist, you will get all sorts of confusing answers.

@michaelg377

3 ай бұрын

That's because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just add *Time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people. "Kinds" was "invented" long before the Creation vs. Evolution debate my friend - literally thousands of years ago based on tangible manuscript evidence and historical records that we have in our possession. "Kinds" actually does have a defined limitation, it generally includes the reproductive boundaries of a creature. We literally only ever observe biblical speciation within each creature's "kind" (Dogs > dogs, finches > finches, bacteria > bacteria), never once a change between kinds (Coelacanth > Tetrapods, Dinosaurs > Chickens, Fish > philosophers). *"we see nothing of these slow changes in progress, until the hand of time has marked the lapse of the ages"* (Charles Darwin) *"we are condemned to live only for a few decades, and that's too slow, too small a time scale to see evolution going on"* (Richard Dawkins) Whatever "evolution" is, at least we agree it's not actually "observable." The only thing we observe is biblical speciation within each creature's "kind" (Dogs > dogs, finches > finches, etc.) never once a change between kinds (Fish > Philosophers, Coelacanth > Tetrapod, etc.). All the best evidences for evolution can also be explained by Genesis 1-12, and if you understand "science" (a methodology) then you understand the implications of a competing explanation.

The amount of evidence revealed in this well-made documentary is shocking and revolutionary. If one watches this objectively, one cannot but conclude that some of the currently accepted theories of the origin of life, the flood, and other subjects are severely distorted and based on incomplete evidence and/or are influenced through false presuppositions. This explains thoroughly and offers a more sound understanding of the treated subjects. Well done and glory to God!

@chrisyoung5929

4 жыл бұрын

" in this well-made documentary is shocking and revolutionary" I disagree I watched a couple of sections and groaned at the rubbish. Like the part were they say that "you have to look at the text" about the Bible then they lie about what the Bible says about genealogy of Joseph. So a challenge pick any section of this post it here and we will look at this evidence together.

@alphatav3733

4 жыл бұрын

DD DDD Do you presuppose that there is no Creator, despite a creation? Awkward.

@chrisyoung5929

4 жыл бұрын

@@alphatav3733 Are you presupposing that all acts of creation require a thinking being some how? Where did you get that from? A volcano explodes creating a hole and new landscape do you think that means the volcano is an intentional being?

@alphatav3733

4 жыл бұрын

DD DDD so you presuppose that there isn't a Creator because you don't believe something is created? I see a building, a assume there was an architect and builder. That is my point. You believe that nothing created/formed/made/produced everything. That is also a presupposition, but it is disingenuous. The truth is that people don't want to believe in a God, because then we would be held morally accountable for all the sin in our life. Atheism allows us to make god in our image. Therefore nothing is wrong and there is no reason to argue about it. Why would you argue about something when there is no ultimate meaning to it?

@alphatav3733

4 жыл бұрын

Chris Young How did the volcano get there in the first place?

What a great fascinating, thought-provoking, eye-opening, and factual Documentary. HOW GREAT IS OUR GOD! UNMEASURABLE BEYOND HUMAN MIND. Please consider accepting my endless love and support here from the Philippines. Really really worth it to watch!. Consider my endless gratitude brothers and sisters out there! God Loves you beyond your own understanding.

@FRN2013

4 жыл бұрын

Mabuhay! We're in Davao City. What place are you in?

@matthewboster5506

2 жыл бұрын

Define factual i mean Jesus Christ you people are living in a fantasy land lol grow up

Excellent work. I've had a foundation of God's Word and His Creation built into me as a young person and still greatly enjoy hearing the consistency and proof of God's existence and intentions in His Creation. Thanks for putting this together and giving us a great opportunity to review and strengthen the Truth.

When the windows of heaven and the fountains of the deep opened, the earth became one huge ocean covering even the highest mountains. But my big question is ,where did the waters recede to following the flood?

@TheLookingGlass001

5 ай бұрын

Well knowing that water came from beneath the earth also would assume that there was somewhat a cavern to store the water. Much like an aquifer, the water likely just made its way back to where it came. I'm no professional, it is honestly my best guess. Hope this at least gives an idea for you

@michaelg377

5 ай бұрын

Earth is still 70% covered in water today. According to NOAA, if our earth had a smooth flat "outer shell" surface (ie. no mountains, etc.), the water would be 8200 feet deep worldwide. I don't know if that measurement is accurate because I haven't verified it myself, but I do know this... Secular scientists believe Mars was once covered in water, which would explain how it has its canyons throughout - yet there is no observable liquid water on Mars. Earth is 70% covered in water, with marine fossils on mountain tops, and even solid layers of rocks bent at vertical 90 degree angles with no breakage - indicating they were soft, pliable, and *wet* when they folded - plenty of evidence for a global flood, but we say "there's no way earth could have been covered in water by a global flood." Why do we have such a double standard here? It's because of our Atheistic/Evolutionary biases in interpreting the evidence.

@StephenBingham-kp2ld

2 ай бұрын

They evaporated!

In talking with the wife of a geologist: She said he studied the Grand Canyon, & floated the river; concluding it had to have formed underwater (submarine).

@christianclark347

3 жыл бұрын

Interesting. That complies with the conclusions presented here as well of large water-borne depositions and the bit about the underwater sand dunes locked in the upper limestone layer.

All of this is absolutely amazing. If I weren't a believer in Christ, I'd be convinced watching this series.

@profphilbell2075

3 жыл бұрын

You set the bar for critical thinking far too low.

@arcangeloblues

3 жыл бұрын

@@profphilbell2075 Maybe or maybe not.

@SherriP

3 жыл бұрын

Amazing, praise God

@kennaoconnor4633

3 жыл бұрын

@@profphilbell2075 it's called faith and reasoning. I don't have to see something to know it exists or it's true. I've seen more in my life than anyone would understand and it's all God.

@altinokz

3 жыл бұрын

And if you’re a true believer of Christ you must watch Tovia Singer’s Isaiah 53 video, you’’ll love it! G-d bless you 🤗

Scientific interaction and collaboration at a high level. Weighty arguments and analysis that confirm intelligent design and undermine Darwinian evolution. It strengthens our faith in God and Jesus. 🙏👏

I think the world being created in six days may in fact be correct, if the creation story refers to the world of Adam and Eve which was the garden. Eden could very well have been a bubble, a lab environment.

@MrSeedi76

7 ай бұрын

Yup, I had the same thought. Also, the Bible doesn't state how old the earth was before the first day. Creation doesn't start with the first day. So even with a literal reading of the text, it doesn't say how long the creation really was.

I been looking for this video for 51 years and I finally found it ! From now on Im going to sleep in peace.

@velocitysam4185

2 жыл бұрын

Please tell us more..

@chriskragtwijk6191

2 жыл бұрын

Sarcastic XD

@Gamefan86

2 жыл бұрын

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun throug the heavens.

In the '80s, Lake Powel was at capacity and they had to open the spillways to lower the water level. They were tunnels cut into the rock to pass water around the Glen Canyon dam. When they closed them weeks later and engineers inspected the tunnels, they were amazed at the erosion in the rock walls. This is the power of water.

@ozowen

2 жыл бұрын

Ah, a dam in a place of easily eroded sandstone, known for being easily and rapidly eroded is what exactly? Do you suppose all strata behave that way?

@SirDeanosity

2 жыл бұрын

@@ozowen Cavitation will pulverize any rock when flowing at least 100ft/sec.

@ozowen

2 жыл бұрын

@@SirDeanosity "Any rock"? So is there a reason why the supposed Grand Canyon impact is not seen everywhere? Oh wait- there isn't. So the comment means what exactly?

@chrislachat459

2 жыл бұрын

@@ozowen It seems your question was answered and yet you pontificate and avoid the answer, which was correct but it didn't back your wrong bias. A global flood would provide the cataclysmic evidence we see today. Science without the bias shows this to be true. Your bias does not change truth but you knew that. There's this thing called a search engine, it will help your vain misconceptions be righted.

@ozowen

2 жыл бұрын

@@chrislachat459 The dam in question is placed on highly porous rocks subject to cavitation and easy erosion. Feel free to explain how that is the same as all rock. Reasons why there is no global flood at any time in recent history. 1) No flood strata. After any large flood event, in particular ones where there is tumultuous movement, currents, collisions of currents, concurrent tectonic activity- then any unstable strata are forced into the water, strata destroyed and the resultant strata after everything has settles tends to cruder layering in flood order (sand silt clay). We should see that globally- we do not. 2) Any aerial strata cannot be anywhere in the so called flood sedimentary layers. We have a global one plus plenty of local and regional ones all through the geo strata 3) No dry layers should be anywhere- yet there are also plenty of them. 4) Fragile laminae such as those found in varve strata have no business being in such sediment. Too fragile to survive such activity, especially since they are almost always adjacent to mountains (which were supposedly thrust up in the flood). These are biennial strata and can be manually counted- going uninterrupted, globally, hundreds of thousands or millions of years. They should not even exist. 5) Fossils should always be in muddled order. Drowned carcasses only sink to the bottom when the water is very cold. But the rapid thrust of water from the deep means the water (and air btw) get superheated by the kinetic energy alone. 6) No clear sedimentary strata for the period should exist anywhere near the upthrust mountain ranges. But they predominate. There is much more of course, but that's a start

They do realize that Noah was instructed to bring 7 pairs of each kind of clean animals and 2 pairs of each kind of unclean animals on the Arc right?

Biblical events are Spiritual. Spiritual events are described using physical references and verbages from different perspectives. Be thinking spirit. An example: Mountains are a reference describing a spirit that is filled with other spirits. Trees are used to describe spirit too. Animals are used to describe people spirits. Example: sheep are believers. Oxen are tillers of the spirit. Spirit affects the flesh, and flesh affects the spirit.

Thank you so much for all the effort, time, and money that was put into this film. God bless you all.

@joelbachmann10

3 жыл бұрын

That is, If he exist

@joelbachmann10

3 жыл бұрын

@Jake Lloyd free will

@joelbachmann10

3 жыл бұрын

@Jake Lloyd non, we follow scientific facts

@fredkilian4049

3 жыл бұрын

@@joelbachmann10 It is not scientific fact if it is not repeatable. "Replenish the earth" says God.

@numbersix9477

3 жыл бұрын

@@fredkilian4049 --- You must be a scientist. What is your specialty?

this documentary has an addictive quality to it, I watched it over and over again and never got bored. God bless you all

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

Here is another piece of evidence that I hope you find of interest: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@IIrandhandleII Ignoring evidence is a normal atheistic-Naturalist response... *Did you know that atheistic-Naturalists unavoidably have to invoke Supernatural phenomena to "naturally" explain our universe?* The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.

@gerrymoningkey5298

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Just because their interpretation of the data don't line up with your worldview doesn't distract that they have good cinematography and screenwriting. (which is the point of my comment). Have a good day anyway ;)

@gerrymoningkey5298

2 жыл бұрын

@@IIrandhandleII That's a very poor response (resorting to personal insult) ...

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 That's not true, I read everything you post and have always honestly considered it - but what you post is usually unsubstantiated claims, and when it is substantiated it is always based on worldview assumptions that are demonstrably internally inconsistent, which have a history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, which cannot explain things it ought to be able to explain, and which is not existentially viable (ie. you can't live it out in reality). 4 clear signs of a faulty worldview, none of which are a problem for a biblical worldview. Meanwhile you are the atheistic-Naturalist trolling under a Creationist KZread video my friend, so you're also being hypocritical, with respect. Quote: "Why do I care? Were you to keep your beliefs to yourselves, I wouldn't. But in the United States today, people of faith insist on imposing their beliefs on everyone else. On social policy. On the law. On education. Religion is backward, an impediment to progress, dishonest, manipulative, the longest running scam in human history. And I am going to do whatever I can to promote its destruction." ~Nicholas Christie-Blick, 3/29/2021

Wonderful, compelling presentation. Thank you and God bless you all.

@IsGenesisHistory

7 ай бұрын

You are very welcome! We're so glad you enjoyed our film.

Hubby and I are Seventh-day Adventists, wanted to watch a good Creation video, and found this. MANY thanks for such an organized and stunningly beautiful presentation.

@Sunnytrailrunner

Ай бұрын

I did as well‼️I’m a born again believer & have watched a KZread channel called “Hope Through Prophecy,” which is basically 7th Day Adventist, & have learned a great deal. After reading through quite a few mostly negative comments posted here, l was immediately uplifted when l got to yours & read it❗️l found this video well-presented & very enjoyable. CHECK THIS OUT ➡️ KZread has an official trailer for the new Biblically based movie called “THE ARK & THE DARKNESS,” being released 3/20&21/2024 & shown in select theaters around the country (dates may vary, depending on your location). May God richly bless you & your husband‼️

@murrayhamilton2658

25 күн бұрын

Me too. It is a pity the presenters don't understand that the Universe is much older than the surface of this earth. The comment in day 4 is an aside (He made the stars also). It does not state that the stars were spoken into existence on Day 4 of the creation week.

I came across this documentary a few years back and wished that I had recorded it. Now is back and I am doing just that, for future reference. Thanks for uploading it again.

@rosefenton3005

4 жыл бұрын

Please show me how I may record it to watch later. I am elderly.

@javiermgtaoism5702

4 жыл бұрын

@@rosefenton3005 There may be a way to record but I use a software that I purchased. Sorry.

@robertashcraft1360

4 жыл бұрын

@@javiermgtaoism5702 What is the software, stuff like this is invaluable, but I have a lot of gray hair so it has to be relatively simple, thanks in advance.

@javiermgtaoism5702

4 жыл бұрын

@@robertashcraft1360 I am not an advertiser and hope it will not be interpreted as spam. The software is called 'Wondershare Uniconverter'. It costs about 39 US dollars for a years subscription. I have downloaded hundreds of videos and movies with it.

@briansturner

4 жыл бұрын

Please pay the Author guys, Thou Shalt Not Steal.

One of the best documentaries I’ve ever watched, so logical and sensible. Very well produced, well done to all and all Glory to God.

@shanehughes8528

3 жыл бұрын

How did you get that from any of this absoute nonsense?

@Kehvo_exe

3 жыл бұрын

Shane Hughes You’re just ignorant and looking for people to annoy, run along and grow up. Internet trolls really are the equivalent of annoying mosquitoes

@shanehughes8528

3 жыл бұрын

@Ezabi ... says some one who believes in talking donkeys, talking snakes, dragons, and probably unicorns all cause "My book says so." Though thats all you have. a book that is wrong about just about everything. Oh and magic. You believe magic real

@carolrozier756

3 жыл бұрын

It's complete nonsense that only someone who's ignorant of science and very gullible would believe. Austin is liar and a coward.

@shanehughes8528

3 жыл бұрын

@Kile Not resuppostions these are all things the bible say happened and the fact you still think a donkey talked at any point in time shows exactly what I was talk king about. These things never happened. It's odd the "Miracles' went from separationing the Red Sea to now where people go "I beat cancer. It was a miracle cause of god." Forgetting they took human medicine that cured them and an invisible man did nothing.

The fact that the universe is infitely vast cries out that the all mighty made it!

I’m in my 50’s as I grow old I do appreciate everything I see miracles every single day

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@maylingng4107 With respect, what's miraculous is that evolutionists literally believe that mass quantities of ordered and sequenced instructions (DNA) can come into existence out of non-information without an intelligent source in contrast to every other observable instance of information in existence which always has an intelligent source . It's sad that when they run into a problem like young comets that don't fit in their billions of years atheistic religion (evolution, Big Bang, etc.), they are willing to fabricate entire celestial objects like Oort clouds without a shred of observable evidence . When we find young soft tissues in dinosaur fossils, or young C-14 inside of diamonds, coal deposits all across the US, and in fossils from every geologic layer, evolutionists just reject it and twist the evidence to fit their atheistic religious beliefs concerning our origins. Then when the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and other laws of physics contradict each other at the beginning of the universe (making it naturally impossible) they invoke infinite alternate universes... a supernatural solution that supersedes our observable laws of nature, and btw, *infinite alternate universes and realities mean that there is inevitably an alternate universe that is run by magical fairies and with T-Rex's driving tanks down the street... that means that this popular atheist theory requires atheists to concede that their beliefs include the possibilities of magical fairies and other absurd fictional ideas.* And all along the way, you literally believe that we are distantly related to a banana, among so many other problems.... and then they call it "science." Evolution - the internally inconsistent, existentially unviable atheistic religion with a history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, and which cannot explain basic things that it should be able to explain. These things are not a problem for a biblical worldview. I'm not sure you have any grounds to mock Christians May Ling Ng. "It is appointed for man to die once, then comes judgment" (Hebrews 9:27).

@sw_1776

2 жыл бұрын

In the end almost every atheist will argue that there are thousands of universes and we happen to live in the one where life could exist the way it has and is now. So where exactly is the machine that's spitting out thousands of universes and where does it get the mass and energy to do so? People often criticize any religious belief strictly because they do not want to answer for anything and live as they see fit. Don't judge them for that show them love, hate and blood profits mankind nothing

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@May Ling This isn't a question of evidence, it's a matter of competing worldviews over the exact same evidence. For example, please consider the following observations from your belief system (several of which you have personally championed here): The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.

@mtmhoops1506

2 жыл бұрын

@@michael9237 MICHAEL you are a absolute Menace to atheist in this comment section and I’ve read so meny of your comments, I’m a brother in Christ is there any way I could get in contact with you, Facebook ,snap chat email, phone number anything man, I’m very Shook by your intellect and I would like to talk to you farther brother

@alantasman8273

2 жыл бұрын

@@maylingng4107 There is a word for people who fail to see life for the precious gift it is...bigoted or hateful.

Had me believing them millions of years in school and after but now at 66 years young I believe in six day creation and the great flood! Praise God he opened my eyes to the truth just like he said! Seek and you will find!

@zaney1956

Жыл бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 HaHaHa you are a funny person! You have been decieved just like I was and talking dillusional! God created it in six literal days in bc time we now live in ad time in a matter of about 7000 years old and Jesus will return soon to prove it as we are in the days of Noah!

@elijahfreeman5299

Жыл бұрын

@@zaney1956 No. There is no scientific evidence of that. None.

@danielthomas5212

Жыл бұрын

are you jooo ish?

@zaney1956

Жыл бұрын

@@danielthomas5212 White American!

@modakkagitplugga

Жыл бұрын

Amen brother

This was a realy great documentary. Thank you for making it available to us for free. Such a wonderful blessing.

OK, here it goes! I am very appreciative of the fact that someone is trying to look outside of the box. I am a geologist myself, but this Austin guy seems to be very biased. He talks about a rock formation that was stratigraphically layered over a short Geological time scale, which, BTW, still has to be over several hundreds to thousands to hundreds of thousands of years, depending of external factors. But, there are many different rock structures out there that have formed in totally different ways, and that - except rain water, rivers, or ice - have not been affected by a so-called global flood. Anyhow, there are still many differences. Austin talks about rocks formed by the influence of a marshy, deltaic environment, where rivers met the sea, as it was in the time of the mid-continental seaway. That was the time when dinosaurs roamed the earth, the north American continent was moving northwards, and ice caps had not existed. In other words, it was a time of global warming when man had yet to become. He also talks about the end of the last ice age as it was the actual biblical flood. Geez! What kind of geologist is he? The Colorado River basin eroded fast because of the continental uplift due to the heavy icesheets layers on the north part of the continent. But now, we see a rebounce of the continent, thus the deepening of the Colorado River. Yet, the Bible describes "the flood", not as the rapid melting of the icesheets, but as coming from heavy rains (40 days and nights) that eventually made the 4 big rivers of the Middle East to overflow the area. I am not familiar with the geology of that area, but would certainly love to do a study to see if there is such evidence. I did watch, however, a video where a geologist did some digging/boreholeing for that same purpose. She hasn't found any evidence of a large-scale flood in the area of the old Mesopotamia and up to Turkey for the past 6 - to 8,000 years. One thing that people have a hard time understanding is the Geological time scales. It is true that water and ice has enormous strength to erode things, but on the other side, some of the rocks that were formed had been formed over millions of years. Sand, for example, has to be compacted and cemented with water over millions of years in order to form a mountain of sandstone (you need trillions and trillions of sand grains); or, mountain building through tectonics, considering that the plates moving at an average of 2 - 10 cm per year; or volcanic activities over hundreds to several thousands of years. This is why the Geological time scale, the whole creation of earth and everything we see on it lasted for over 4 billions of years. Things, or the creation of things have not occurred suddenly, in a second, but over a very very long time at a very very slow pace, exactly as we see them forming today. At the end, I figured that all these geologist and scientists you talk to to create this video, are all biased to fit your own convictions. Science is not how it works. Science is a field not to find people with certain views, but is a field of research and experimentation. This other Andrew guy talks about the large differences in the rock dating. Is clear that he is not a specialist is that. The reason why zircon is used to date rocks, and not Calcium, as he showed it, is because zircon is much more stable, and is formed in water. So, there's also an evidence of having water on earth from the time of formation of those zircons. For ex., for the dating of the oldest rocks on earth, zircon was used, which also an evidence that water was on earth for more than 4 billion years. Dating rocks are way more complicated than Andrew explained it, and involves complex mathematical calculations.

very powerful and thank you to all who made this factual events come to life in the 20th century. Christianity Is The Beacon Of Light Love for GOD and Hope .

@chrislachat459

2 жыл бұрын

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 your butt-hurt screeds don't change anyone's minds. Common sense easily shows truth will rule over you. Selah

@chrislachat459

2 жыл бұрын

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 LOL. Atheist are religious, that's were the common sense comes in. Atheist have made "science" their religion of choice, not that it implies they're any smarter, just more arrogant. Science is God's creation, so it therefore makes known what is applied to our lives and in our lives. Christian's with this view have no problem with a young earth just as God describes in Genesis. That's what this video shows and it's why unbelievers gnash their teeth in anger. Don't like it, move on. We are steadfast.

@judahborgwardt2860

2 жыл бұрын

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 You sound hurt... are you alright? Cuz competing in a shouting match against Christians isn't gonna do anything.

@judahborgwardt2860

2 жыл бұрын

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 The cool thing about the Bible is that it never says how old the universe is. Genesis just begins with, "Now the earth was formless and empty" so for all we know, the universe itself could actually be billions of years old. It also doesn't mention how long Adam and Eve were on the earth for before the fall into sin. The earth itself could also be billions of years old, since no animals would have died in a perfect world. And yes, it can be frustrating sometimes seeing Christians wander into an argument and get blasted because they don't correctly know how to defend their faith. I've seen Christians say terrible things and not act like they should (Im on ifunny, so that should explain a lot). That's the effect of sin in the world because nobody is perfect. My "philosophy" is just seeing other people as... well, people. We often get caught up in everything that we forget that a comment online was made by a real person with their own life and experiences. So if everyone is willing to see the other side from a different perspective, we could truly open our minds and find what the universal truth is. Well, that's my rant for today. Thanks for listening and not being rude. Have a good day ;)

@judahborgwardt2860

2 жыл бұрын

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 Ayy no problem. That's awful to hear as well. These days I feel like "Christians" just use the title to make themselves feel superior. It's just depressing as the rest of us get a bad name. The way you spot a true Christian is the way they act. If they always act out of turn and force their religion on others, everything becomes a huge problem. True Christians try to act as we believe Jesus did - even loving our enemies, which seems impossible at times. Of course, that doesn't mean we don't make mistakes. Everyone is sinful... but all have been saved. Hats off to ya 🎩

I love this video. I watched it about a year ago, and I rewatched it today. I think I’ll be watching it again and again, because there is so much information here. My kids are all interested in science - they each have a personal favorite - and they have asked me several questions about how different scientific principles seem to disprove our faith. This video answers their questions. It also shows them that Christianity and science aren’t mutually exclusive. Hearing marine biologists, geologists, paleontologists and astronomers explain how their fields of expertise prove Creation has helped me reconcile my family’s devout faith with our love of science. Thank you so much for this video, it is truly a gift. And, of course, Thank God for making this video possible!! To Him go the Glory!!

@matman4464

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 outstanding ego my friend!👏👏👏

@ozowen

2 жыл бұрын

@@matman4464 Or he is speaking truth. Which is far more likely- ego or not.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

I applaud you for not giving in to the scientifically ludicrous mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles can literally turn themselves into people if you just wait a really really long time, and that "nothing created everything accidentally." Unfortunately you fell into the militant atheist troll trap on this page... but amen sister. Look up GotQuestions if you need answers to hard Bible questions. Your kids are not "meaningless evolved protoplasm" in a meaningless chemical universe that doesn't care about you - they are valuable human beings made in the image of God. *"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23) *"The wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord"* (Romans 6:23) *"It is appointed for man to die once, then comes Judgment"* (Hebrews 9:27)

@ozowen

2 жыл бұрын

@@michael9237 Mikey will actually try to encourage you to lie to your kids. The "science" on this video is nonsense. Your kids might start by being fooled, but when they eventually learn actual science, and the actual scientific method, then this fetid BS will necessarily fall by the wayside. Then you will need to deal with the fact that your kids will regard all that you "explained" to them as nonsense. That's a normal parent thing- so no worries. But the fact that they will likely turn away from God because the limited and nonsensical version preached here- well that will be a sad thing indeed.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

I just don't have enough faith to believe that fish evolve into philosophers and that puddles can turn themselves into people if you just wait a really long time. Here's an observation/question: 1-) DNA contains mass quantities of ordered, sequenced, encoded information that "tells" your body how to grow, including instructions for your eye. 2-) Every single observable instance of information in existence always has an intelligent source (the words on this screen, in a book, programming in your computer, etc.) Conclusion) Therefore, consistently interpreted, the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source (a Creator - God). How do you handle this observable evidence? Do you: A) Consistently interpret this evidence - the information in DNA had an intelligent source like the rest of the observable evidence. B) Inconsistently interpret the evidence - information in DNA Unscientifically must be the exception to all the rest of the observable evidence. Information created itself from non-information just that one time. C) Deny that it's information, it's just chemicals - chemicals just fizz into your eye's concave light-refracting lens, 137M light sensitive cells, 40M nerve endings, and precise muscles that auto-focus this complex optical system 100,000 times a day. D) Ignore the evidence, say "well science just doesn't know yet," insist on an Atheistic/Naturalistic explanation. *Wouldn't it be more scientifically consistent to interpret the information in DNA as also having an Intelligent Source, like all the rest of the observable evidence...?* Your answer speaks volumes about your scientific/unscientific worldview assumptions/biases.

Yes, I believe Genesis is history. I also believe in biblical cosmology. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Great work! Very professional and good editing. Thanks for your efforts to educate!

@IsGenesisHistory

8 ай бұрын

Our pleasure! We're so glad you enjoyed our film!

@theojobse3341

Ай бұрын

Notice something! Exhaustive observations? Ohhhh science? " Hebrew. "My expert has, after all his experiences and observations and explanations deep thoughts that influenced his mind. The wow factor that is the science. Thankyou Lord for the wow factor and ability to be after so many years to be impressed anew.

@theojobse3341

Ай бұрын

Thankyou Lord for my friend Noel Weeks who went through so much to have the privilege to study Hebrew ancient and modern. That over his life felt the need to write down despite all opposition and You Lord made his zeal possible I'm very late in appreciation for his efforts because he's long buried and in that place prepared for him to wait for You Lord. Thankyou Lord for Life and the wow factor I experience daily.

@theojobse3341

Ай бұрын

WOW factor

I have learned so much more about science and history and archeology listening to all these videos than I did in school .

@Paul-hl8yg

3 жыл бұрын

These videos spew total rubbish.. Creationism & Genesis are completely false. Evolution is real!

@martinwoodworth3715

3 жыл бұрын

@@Paul-hl8yg There are missing links. This video states changes via evolution, but only changes within a species. The thing I'm confused by is the Earth being 6000 years old when ancient trees exist that have rings showing 20,000 years. So Bible says 6000 years yet there is clear proof of 20,000 years at the very least. I know carbon 14 dating is a mess for dates beyond 20,000 years.

@Paul-hl8yg

3 жыл бұрын

@@martinwoodworth3715 Creationism is false, utterly & completely false! .. The Earth is millions of years old, the sun older than the Earth & the Universe 13.7 billion years old. All these are facts, that have been studied. The data that makes these figures, come from many sources. Evolution is completely true & again, many sciences all come together for this. The whale, for instance.. We have found fossil evidence that they once walked on land. We have found transitional fossils, creatures that once lived & were ancestors of the whales. Whales are mammals, they breath air, like all mammals. Even their tail bones show, that they once walked, not swam! All fish have gills & do not breath air like mammals. Fish tails always go from side to side. Yet all the mammals in the seas, their tales go up & down. The bones in those aquatic mammal, show ankles, knees etc, that have elongated & changed for swimming. There are microscopic creatures living on our eyelashes, which clean them. They eat the debris on the lashes. Since the invention of mascara, these creatures have evolved. Everytime someone uses mascara, the creatures start to die off. However before they do, the last eggs laid, hatch with their digestive systems changed, to only eat mascara! Then, when the person stops using mascara, the same happens again, but the creatures have adapted their digestive system, to only eat the normal debris again. This is evolution in action, a creature adapting to its environment physically, for existence. There is no proof or verifiable evidence for any of the worlds deities, none, zero! Yet an abundance of data, proof & verified evidence for the old Earth & for Evolution!

@martinwoodworth3715

3 жыл бұрын

@@Paul-hl8yg If carbon 14 dating can't be trusted beyond 20,000 years I want to know how they date rocks to be 4.5 billion years. I'm very open minded & not a Christian. I am spiritual & love science. Science is our ability to understand our surroundings. Bible talks of beings living 800 years, these were aliens. They messed with our dna theory is very interesting theory too.

@Paul-hl8yg

3 жыл бұрын

@@martinwoodworth3715 Also, always always remember.. Anything that claims to be a "god", is not worthy of that title! And, if such a great being actually existed, surely it couldn't just exist? Surely 'it' had to have a beginning? Surely 'it' had a parent/s or species to belong to itself? Firstly Man invented gods, then they decided there must only be 'one'. Why? The Pharaoh Akhanaten was the first in recorded history to claim, there was only One (the Aten) & the word spread. Then people, later to become "Jews", carried that forth, making their own religion, with their own "one god". Plagiarism is rife within religion!

I am amazed at how often Luke 19:40 is shown here. It is woven throughout. While humans in general and certain Christians remain silent, the rocks are declaring the Glory of God.

@patrickvanbaal2837

2 жыл бұрын

But your god doesn't exist. Fact. So the rocks you're babbling about don't declare anything. Who wrote Luke? Hint: not Luke.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@patrickvanbaal2837 That's because you put your Faith in the modern mythology that puddles can turn themselves into people if you wait a real long time, fish evolve into philosophers, and entire mathematically ordered universes can pop themselves into existence at any moment... we just don't have enough faith to believe in that. For all your anti-God assertions, you sure do suspiciously live perfectly in line with everything He said about you. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed. This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview. You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15) "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)

@breadfish4683

2 жыл бұрын

@@patrickvanbaal2837 You'll be surprise when you see God with your own eyes in spiritual body.

@smitty121981

2 жыл бұрын

@@michael9237 "we just don't have enough faith" Yes....creationists are extremely lacking in faith, that's why they're all liars!

“Time is not a magic wand that solves all the geologic problems of the world!” Well I’m definitely using that statement in the future. Love this video. Thank you.

I just found this video, what a wonderful and educational video on bringing the Word of God and Genesis, the human history and our natural systems back to the creator paradigm.

Gods intelligence is beyond comprehension. He created all this for our enjoyment. We sinned against him and then in the richness of his grace came to earth to die for us. 1 Corinthians 2:9. What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man imagined, what God has prepared for those who love him” Wow just wow.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@maylingng4107 With respect, your argument ignores God's Omniscient character. God knew all of this would happen from the beginning, and He prophesied Jesus' coming right off the bat in Genesis 3:15. The bad things that happen are a result of allowing free will. God created everything good (Genesis 1:31), but then Adam and Eve decided to rebel against God, seek to "be like God," and follow Satan (Genesis 3:5) and trust in a lie rather than their Creator. You still see this kind of behavior today. I don't have enough faith to believe that fish evolve into philosophers, you are cousin to a banana, and entire universes can pop into existence at any moment. "They perish because they *refused to love the truth* and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a *powerful delusion* so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who *have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness* ." (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12)

@analyst1777

2 жыл бұрын

God created all of the problems you see on earth when he cast Satan down to the earth alone with all of his followers and still to this day he / she hasn't been able to clean that mess up. There is no question about who's running the earth 😀

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

​@@analyst1777 The problem is that Adam and Eve made a free will choice to rebel against God, follow Satan, and trust in a lie, and it is through their sin that our nature became corrupt. What do you mean God "hasn't been able to clean that mess up" - He is in control and you can't do anything unless He allows you to (Genesis 3:5). If God is Holy and Just then He has to punish sin, and He will... but the reason He allows evil to continue to exist in the world temporarily is because you are evil, and He delayed Judgment Day to give you a chance to repent. You are very fortunate. "But God is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish, but for all to reach repentance" (2 Peter 3:9).

@analyst1777

2 жыл бұрын

@@michael9237 If you erased satan from the Genesis story there isn't any logical reason to believe mankind would have ever fell. There would be no lie and they would have never even known evil. The book of Enoch even teaches what fallen evils fallen angels taught mankind I will agree with you somewhat he is in control in the sense that Satan has to get permission to convince people to rape, murder, cause war, sickness and destroy the Earth from God just like in the story of Job.

@michaelling2477

2 жыл бұрын

@@analyst1777 Not every act of evil originates from Satan nor the fallen angelic host. Evil also originates from the free will of those who choose to do wickedly, e.g. not every murder originates from Satan as people can freely choose to murder from their own impulses.. The importance of the Millennial Reign of Christ in the present creation at the end of the age is a necessity for in that time (era) Christ will reign supreme over fallen and redeemed humans while Satan and the fallen host are bound. At the end of the reign Satan will be unbound and there will still be those who choose of their free will driven by their desires in opposition to Christ to follow Satan thus negating the Devil made me do it (I am a product of my environment) mentality which seeks to place the blame elsewhere but upon one's self.

This is the best audio quality I've ever heard on my little laptop! THANK YOU!!

@grantbennett333

4 жыл бұрын

Is the earth..flat ? Since curvature can't be proven

Great stuff!!! One question, we have different layers encapsulating different creatures and track waves, but where are the people, cities?

@marilyncausey9348

3 ай бұрын

For more archeology from a Biblical perspective, check out the Expedition Bible channel. He discussed found cities, etc. It's another really good channel, like this one.

@YDDES

2 ай бұрын

Gracefellowship9494 Maybe You can’t find the remains of people from the Bible, because those are just stories made up in the minds of the writers, like most books?

I was five years old in the 80s and the snow when I was a kid, was much, much wetter than it is these days. The snow that falls now is dry and small and it doesn't have the ability to pack and make snowballs. But, when I was a kid, we could take a baseball size ball of snow and roll it across the ground and it would pack into as big of a ball you could make if you could push the weight!! We used to make Giant snow castles we had such great packing snow. I remember one year, we made several snow animals and it was easy. It didn't take but a couple hours because the snow just cooperated and stuck together because of the large amount of moisture in the air. I also remember the beaches on the great lakes were much bigger. We could walk out 3 miles from the beach and it was still knee deep water. Now the water is right up to the houses, all the way around the lake and even the inland lakes have changed and lost frontage. Everything is different than then..... Even the seasons have changed ... used to have the first snow that we could go play in by Nov. 11th when I was a kid, I remember that I couldn't wait until Nov. 11th because we could make snow castles. Now we are lucky if theres snow by December and we just get these horrible deep freezes that we never had in the 80s.

“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools,” (Rom. 1:20-22 NKJV)

@lindawhite6635

2 жыл бұрын

Amen!! Amen and Amen!!!!

@no-yp4ts

2 жыл бұрын

Amen !

@bluenose7984

2 жыл бұрын

Why would an all loving being require that we worship them? It's soooo egotistical!

@no-yp4ts

2 жыл бұрын

@@bluenose7984 He never told nobody, you mast warship Him. Who you love , you warship too. But one rebel love only himself and nobody ellse. This person is really egoistic . By the way ,do you love your parents ?

@bluenose7984

2 жыл бұрын

@@no-yp4ts Worship is not love, we love our family and friends but this being needs to be worshipped which is fanatical love!

Look up the movement of dirt and rock in Louisiana when a drilling rig on a lake drilled into a salt dome. It made a 12 mile long canal in reverse and a 100ish foot water fall.

@markterzano8962

3 жыл бұрын

I lived in Baton Rouge, where is the lake drilled you are talking about? Is it Avery Island? I would like to look it up on Google Earth. Thanks.

@---yu7ff

3 жыл бұрын

@@markterzano8962 Lake Peigneur, 1980

@thatjoeguy7348

3 жыл бұрын

@@markterzano8962 Lake Peigneur, there's an episode on Engineering Disasters about the accident with video. Pretty wild stuff, glad no one was hurt.

I really appreciate this documentary. I think it is well produced and interesting from beginning to end. Very clear presentation that asks and answers the right questions. I've read about the subjects addressed in this film before, but when you actually see (footage of) things like those canyons, Mount Saint Helen's, fossils and the flexible tissue in the dinosaur bone, it has a much stronger impact. This really made the otherwise dry material from books come alive! One thought that stuck with me after watching the video is that our entire planet is a testimony to Gods judgement in the flood, yet we can be totally blind to it, simply seeing mountains and canyons as just "pretty" things in nature. We need that bit of knowledge to recognize that everything is screaming: "Water was here! Lots of it!"

I would love to see a treatment on the Giants and Nephilim in the pre-flood world...

@michaelg377

3 ай бұрын

I would too, but that's a very exegetically in-depth topic and I'd be wary of searching for something like that on KZread. Dr. Michael Heiser wrote a couple books on the subject: "The Unseen Realm" and "Reversing Hermon" which both dive deep into what the fine details of the text in light of ancient Near Eastern culture say about that particular topic.

It's amazing how God talks to us w/o us not even knowing it. I am a believer and yesterday, I had a question as to why there are a lot of different species of dogs and birds and how do they connect to GOd's creation. Today, this video got suggested. I watched it and my question is answered. Yay! What an amazing GOd we have.

@christopherlastname7638

2 жыл бұрын

Evolution is what happen

@mamamarianovits9029

2 жыл бұрын

@@christopherlastname7638 You do realize that ALL dog breads of today are descended from wolves... yes.? This was not a case of evolution, but of breeding to the point of a loss of information(narrower and narrower gene pools).... with absolutely no additions of genetic information, whatsoever, at all. Rather than merely parroting what you've been programmed with ~mere theories~ try to engage that grey matter between your ears a wee bit. There has NEVER been one credible transition fossil, specifically showing the evolution from one "kind" to another. They have all been proven fallacious, hoaxes designed to brainwash, but were successful only in their own "debunking" upon closer study... be it through dna testing or exposure by another researcher. Evolution, as is propagated today, does not exist my friend.

@alantasman8273

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaeljameson6468 Evolution teaches that one species branched out an became others....which a species' genome makes impossible. Evolution also teaches that all living things came from a rock or even nothing.

@alantasman8273

2 жыл бұрын

@@christopherlastname7638 micro evolution or natural selection is not in doubt...evolution teaches that on species can become another...a dog can become a cat given enough time...evolution is a fairy tale at DNA put the lie to.

@jamisojo

2 жыл бұрын

@@mamamarianovits9029 the fossil called "Lucy" it's a great example of a transitional fossil. But what does it matter to you? You have decided what you believe, so you will ignore any evidence to the contrary. ....but you are naive and immature enough to suggest other people "use their grey matter." I can tall you that I have used mine. All of the physical world I see around me tells me that a supernatural being creating everything around us makes no sense to me. I find the amazing story of the changes in our physical world to be much more interesting. I don't resent people who disagree. They should believe what they like.

Wow..I was a survivor of Mt. St. Helens and watched this mountain on a daily basis. Over 4 feet of volcanic ash on our roof. It was like walking on a grey moonscape in my garden.

@voltaire6668

2 жыл бұрын

So, what happened after? Did you dig out? Or was your property a totaled forever? Does insurance cover anything? Seriously curious as to what happens to you when a volcano erupts on your house.

@hananewell547

2 жыл бұрын

Woww thanks for sharing !

@melaniehughes8909

2 жыл бұрын

I was a kid living in Rainier when it erupted. We just had to stay inside for several days. We also had ash on our, everything.I remember looking at the two mountains Rainier and St Helen in the distance and Mount St Helen's top was flat like the top blew off

@chickshd

2 жыл бұрын

I was in grade school NYC when Mt. St Helen erupted. If I remember correctly, it was a few days to a week after the eruption. I remember one of the kids in class pointing to the window. Look! It was an overcast day, and we saw what appeared to be snow falling from the sky. It was ash, and it covered everything....Never forgot that day.

@bradjunes1610

2 жыл бұрын

We had 1/2 inch of the ash-----Left for home watching the blast getting mommy ready to leave. Air filters were the item in demand.

Very cool that this doc has 5 million views already in less than 4 years.

Muito obrigado, terminei de ver hoje, simplesmente incrível, obrigado pelos brasileiros que colocaram legenda.

@whilimtaff

4 ай бұрын

God bless from the USA❤❤❤

Wow, love this documentary. It popped up when I was questioning God and the Bible. After this, I realized that how powerful and magical our God the Creator is. I feel astonished by these scientific facts.😁

@syasenns294

Жыл бұрын

Magic means evil

@syasenns294

Жыл бұрын

It is truth only none believers of Jesus say it is false especially college teacher

@joteirlinck4778

4 ай бұрын

@@syasenns294 only brainwashed people believe this

I came across this channel and I am glad I watched it fully it was a mystery of time. God is great and did not give us all the wisdom he have, that leaves us a mistery to think. Praise God almighty who created heaven and earth.

@ozowen

2 жыл бұрын

Shame it's all nonsense really.

@Gamefan86

2 жыл бұрын

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun throug the heavens.

@jonsweetland6527

Жыл бұрын

@@ozowen prove it . . .

@joeythebushkangaroo1

2 ай бұрын

​@@Gamefan86 Interesting... reminds me of when the the True God's 10 plagues insulted ancient Egypt's many gods,at least one was proved powerless with every plague God brought against Egypt. I've never thought of Jesus's actions insulting the pagan sungod worship,which was so prolific among the pagans, with his miracles as well. Thank you for this information.

... a Pyramid is a very simple design , the fact that they are found in many places is because it is easier to build a structure by placing stone blocks in layers that gradually decrease in size ...

This film builds my faith. How many times I’ve watched it! Who counts? The Bible is the manual given by the Creator.

I've watched your movie repeatedly... probably 50 times... I'm watching it again right now... Thanks!!!!

@Paulogia

4 жыл бұрын

I didn't think anyone had seen it more than me. That might count.

@ourlifeinwashington4114

4 жыл бұрын

You must check out Brian Nickels Hydroplate theory here on KZread. It's an amazing look at the evidence from a scientific approach. It's a 6 part vid you can't miss it.

@vroddestroyer300

4 жыл бұрын

@@ourlifeinwashington4114 Sounds awesome... thanks

@knightclan4

4 жыл бұрын

Have you seen Evolutions Achilles Heel by ICR?

@ourlifeinwashington4114

4 жыл бұрын

@@knightclan4 no but I'm about too. Tyvm

When I was at Grand Canyon, I found a couple seashell fossils at edge of north rim. Over 8000 feet above sea level . I think Capitol Reef area shows the Flood wreckage very dramatically also

@h.gonyaulax2190

Жыл бұрын

Never heard of orogenesis?

@Fairburne69

10 ай бұрын

@@h.gonyaulax2190 They probably don't understand tectonic plate movement either.

@quix66hiya22

8 ай бұрын

@@Fairburne69 you can understand plate tectonics without agreeing in old age Earth.

@Fairburne69

8 ай бұрын

@@quix66hiya22 Ah no you can't. Clearly you don't understand.

@williamsparks1036

7 ай бұрын

As the ice age glaciers crawled over the land it picked up sea shells as it worked it's way south, then when the ice age melted it left sea shells scattered here and there. I've picked up sea shells in Kentucky. The glaciers changed the earth"s surface such as the Grand Canyon.

All these guys really need their own series!!

Wonderful video! While I don’t know that some of Genesis isn’t allegorical, I love God and his word. Truly appreciate this brilliant video

The thing that got to me was when that scientist removed flesh from a dinosaur bone that is supposed to have been dead for 60 million years! Wow, that puts a whole different perspective on our time line. This was absolutely eye-opening for me.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

It absolutely does say something about the age of the fossils - but the atheistic-Naturalist is in a predicament here because their a priori old-earth assumptions contradict this young evidence. They believe the earth is 4.5 +/- billion years old, they already "concluded" that dinosaurs were 65+ million years extinct, but now they have soft tissues some of which can't last for more than 650k-900k years. Biblical creationists happily accept this as evidence of a young creation at face value, but atheistic-Naturalists had to invoke a rescuing device to *stretch this evidence to fit their worldview* . What this shows us is that atheistic-Naturalism is a religion, not "science," and that their geologic assumptions about the unobservable past are unreliable.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

*Did you know that the Theory of Evolution shares characteristics of a religion?* In 1981-82 in a federal court in Arkansas it was ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Hundreds of Living fossils? Allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Discovering that numerous allegedly "vestigial" organs actually have a purpose? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Finding an alleged 70 million year old evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?* ....or do we just reinterpret all of this evidence against evolution to sustain the evolutionary belief system? Should we hold evolution to the same *religious* standard? Charles Darwin said "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down... but I know not one." Darwin didn't have access to the fields of genetics and embryology when he made up his theory of naturalistic evolution. *How did male and female evolve?* Specifically, how did the two separate, yet interdependent sets of male-female reproductive *organs* with numerous precision-tuned single points of failure, evolve by "numerous, successive, slight modifications" and still enable functional reproduction? Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other one was still evolving? Going backwards in the evolutionary story, which of these critical organs do you reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications"?

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 With respect I could say the same about what you're doing Dr. Nick... but then again you're attacking the person rather than the scientific issues, so your assertion of "lies" is unsubstantiated and biased. You're also being disingenuous again: Quote: "Why do I care? Were you to keep your beliefs to yourselves, I wouldn't. But in the United States today, people of faith insist on imposing their beliefs on everyone else. On social policy. On the law. On education. Religion is backward, an impediment to progress, dishonest, manipulative, the longest running scam in human history. And I am going to do whatever I can to promote its destruction." ~Nicholas Christie-Blick, 3/29/2021

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 With respect, for all your anti-God assertions you sure do suspiciously live exactly in accordance with everything God said about you Dr. Nick, and in contrast to your own atheistic-Naturalist beliefs. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed. This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview. You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15) "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 QED indeed. Also did you know that all of your assertions are based on internally inconsistent and self-invalidating atheistic-Naturalist assumptions about the unobservable past? For example, *did you know that even atheistic-Naturalists have to unavoidably invoke Supernatural phenomena in order to "naturally" explain our universe?* The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just don't know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias.

After reading many comments and having watched numerous high-level debates between Creationists and Evolutionists, it becomes abundantly clear that this is a "heart" issue more than a "head" issue.

@woodysthoughts4032

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe God created evolution.

@Semper_Fish

2 жыл бұрын

@@WildPhotoShooter Look in the mirror.

@immar1075

2 жыл бұрын

@@WildPhotoShooter Exactly. Faith is the belief in the unknown. If it was known we wouldn't need to use our faith.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@immar1075 That's not entirely accurate. You have faith in the pilot every time you step onto an airplane, faith in a doctor every time they operate on you, faith in your teacher every time you uncritically accept what they are teaching you as true (evolution?). That's what faith is. Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that you are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can quantum pop into existence and create themselves at any moment? I don't have enough *faith* to believe in those very unscientific assertions my friend....

@immar1075

2 жыл бұрын

@@michael9237 " Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that you are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can quantum pop into existence and create themselves at any moment? I don't have enough faith to believe in those very unscientific assertions my friend...." Where did you ever get the idea that I believe any of which you spoke above. You assume much my friend....

Thank you. This is so powerful and professional and true history beyond a shadow of a doubt. Great and epic.

It’s very interesting that this (antediluvian) triceratops “tissue” and indeed all the pristinely intact dinosaur bones have somehow survived the entirety of world crushing, continent smashing and dividing, mountain forming, and otherwise unimaginable destructive forces caused by the worldwide flood.

I have struggled for so long on this topic, was everything created in 6 days or not; I worked in the nuclear industry and even re-designed instruments to refine decay and dating readings. This video was the most wonderful explanation of the importance to understand the history in Genesis and I’ll never question the Bible again, whether the creation happened in 6 physical days as we know it or in 6 different time periods as interpreted as days. The complexity of life had to come from somewhere and I believe it was from God, even if he had to destroy it to make it better.

@hippopotamus6765

4 жыл бұрын

Of course everything was created in 6 days. He was so exhausted that he had to have a break and rested on the 7th. This is the creator of the universe which is 92 billion light years in diameter. But you'd know all about this stuff because of your nuclear knowledge.

@subbull1

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you for sharing Pierre, you are a blessing for many of us.

@maxmac7845

4 жыл бұрын

The order of creation according to the Bible doesn't trouble you at all? Are you certain a bias is not at play in your post?

@Tigerbythetoe

4 жыл бұрын

“I’ll never question the bible again”...? Well that’s the surest way to prove it’s true, stop questioning and it all makes sense.

@civilization57

4 жыл бұрын

@@hippopotamus6765 OK, hippo, if you're so smart, please tell us where all the matter and energy in the universe came from. And please tell us where all the laws of the universe came from. And please tell us where life came from. And the laws of morality. Tell us how evolutionists can defy the laws of science, like biogensis, the conservation of matter, the laws of thermodynamics, the laws of genetics. And finally, give us your proof that God and a spiritual world does NOT exist. Thank you.

As someone who is always fascinated by the creation and the wisdom of the Creator Himself, thank you for strengthen my faith more and more with these evidences. God bless all to all who made this. ♥

@erikjakobneuschvendtner4430

3 жыл бұрын

Man,

@lolsurprise7185

3 жыл бұрын

EVIDENCE. It's an uncountable noun. Like a spoon of sugar (not of sugars)

@dacman53265

3 жыл бұрын

That's a big statement " wisdom of the creator himself " . The next step is to share how he had nothing material and created everything. 👺

@steveaustinaustin7173

3 жыл бұрын

@@dacman53265 There's never been nothing.

@dacman53265

3 жыл бұрын

Steve Austin Austin Then where did everything come from. As Ive been informed there's only two choices. Science or supernatural. It's ok to say science doesn't know for sure. Science goes where the evidence takes them. Christians on the other hand claim a deity. All you have to do with me is prove it . Do that and I'll go to church and say I was wrong.😇😇😇

Thanks so much! I just finished watching it. I'll be rewatching it with my friends and family. 🙏🥰😍

The solar/lunar eclipses are evidence that both the earth and the moon are on a tightly controlled orbit path (the right speed and the right gravity) and the Sun is fixed, what holds the sun in place and the earth and moon on the tightly controlled orbit. Which with everything else proves the existence of a thinking creative being.

@Oldtinear

8 ай бұрын

'what holds the sun in place and the earth and moon on the tightly controlled orbit.'? Err... that would be gravity! The moon used to be much closer to the Earth. The moon's distance from the Earth is increasing by 4cm per year. Earth is 91.40 million miles from the Sun in January and 94.51million miles away in July. The Sun and the Solar System are travelling in the Milky Way galaxy and their speed around the centre of the Milky Way is about 220 km/s.

Wonderfully done, my hats off to this production and I praise God for the inspiration to all those who contributed. God bless you all

@gospeljohn413

Жыл бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 lol , the vast greatness of God cannot be questioned by mortal man, God is Spirit. I trust the word of God over any science, we could not have science if not for God and His Bible. I believe the Bible and take every word of it literally and if that makes me a fool then I’m a fool for the Lord God. This explanation makes perfect sense on how it was all done by God. But then Gods word tells us God will confound the wisest. Thanks for your input, I will pray that your heart will open your mind to God and not so much on man. God bless

@danielthomas5212

Жыл бұрын

are you an ethnic jew?

@bicycleutopia

Жыл бұрын

which god??

@gospeljohn413

Жыл бұрын

@@bicycleutopia , there is only one true God. LOL

@mehallica666

Жыл бұрын

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 A bit late, but excellent post, dude.

Best video ever on KZread. Understanding that there are still humans on earth that make us all understand the meaning of life. Love it thank you.

@Gamefan86

Жыл бұрын

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens. Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun. Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info. .. .. .

@Gamefan86

Жыл бұрын

The meaning of life is to survive and have offspring.

@Hannestv4607

Жыл бұрын

AHA which sun died for 3 days?? TO which Jesus died at the Pasa! So what does this have to do with December?

@Gamefan86

Жыл бұрын

Watch zeitgeist the movie, the religious part, you can find it here on YT.

@jonsweetland6527

Жыл бұрын

@@Gamefan86 the "meaning" of life is procreate one's own competitors to survival? where do you thoughtless cretans come up with this stuff?

When I see the highest mountains and the lowest valleys, I can't help but wonder how much more water is stored away in the belly of the earth.😇 🇦🇺🙋‍♂️🇦🇺

@AntonetteHopkins-cv7hd

4 ай бұрын

About 1.7 percent of all of Earth's water is groundwater and about 30.1 percent of freshwater on Earth occurs as groundwater.

﴿۞ وَهُوَ الَّذِي مَرَجَ الْبَحْرَيْنِ هَٰذَا عَذْبٌ فُرَاتٌ وَهَٰذَا مِلْحٌ أُجَاجٌ وَجَعَلَ بَيْنَهُمَا بَرْزَخًا وَحِجْرًا مَّحْجُورًا﴾ سورة الفرقان الآية 53 25:53QURAN) And it is He who has released [simultaneously] the two seas, one fresh and sweet and one salty and bitter, and He placed between them a barrier and prohibiting partition.

Just watched it a second time..learned more. I'm 70 and still learning about my Lord and His creation. Thank you.

@michael9237

3 жыл бұрын

Did you know that even the 4000-5000 year old secular Chinese language contains Biblical imagery in some of its characters? I have yet to see a reasonable secular explanation for this: For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). There are dozens of these, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist for millennia after the Chinese language began? Also *did you know that secular scientists debunked evolutionist claims to "junk DNA"?* We've been lied to. "The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse" (Romans 1:20)

@michael9237

3 жыл бұрын

The belief that nothing created everything, that nature created itself (which requires Nature to be Pre-Existent - a *supernatural* quality), that all the right proteins required for life created themselves *in contrast to the known scientific problem of hydrolysis* which prevents protein formation, that the mass quantities of instructions in DNA created themselves *in contrast to the observable evidence* that other instance of information which always has an intelligent source, the belief that fish evolve into philosophers, that we are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can just pop into existence at any moment.... *is incompatible with entire disciplines of science* . *Did you know that secular scientists even recently disproved evolutionist claims to "junk DNA"?*

@killaxdoughboy4394

3 жыл бұрын

@@NilsEldor 10 ways? Present them

@killaxdoughboy4394

3 жыл бұрын

@@NilsEldor I cannot help you

@killaxdoughboy4394

3 жыл бұрын

@@NilsEldor Ignorance is bliss. Any clinical psychologist could see you need help. You contradict yourself within your mind and are oblivious to the action. What's your stance on religion? Humor me. What dictates your life if not God? You claim the idiocy in me originates from a source you don't even believe to exist. I'm perplexed. Then you claim God punishes you while also pointing towards the claim that he doesn't exist? No need to respond

This video gave me chills and really cemented the fact that God is very much in the midst of His creation. Just to think about some of the points about time, dispersions, and fossils you can see the consistency with the Genesis account. This challenges me to take God’s word more seriously! God bless y’all!

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

*Did you know that the Theory of Evolution shares characteristics of a religion?* In 1981-82 in a federal court in Arkansas it was ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Hundreds of Living fossils? Allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Discovering that numerous allegedly "vestigial" organs actually have a purpose? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Finding an alleged 70 million year old evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?* ....or do we just reinterpret all of this evidence against evolution to sustain the evolutionary belief system? Should we hold evolution to the same *religious* standard? Charles Darwin said "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down... but I know not one." Darwin didn't have access to the fields of genetics and embryology when he made up his theory of naturalistic evolution. *How did male and female evolve?* Specifically, how did the two separate, yet interdependent sets of male-female reproductive *organs* with numerous precision-tuned single points of failure, evolve by "numerous, successive, slight modifications" and still enable functional reproduction? Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other one was still evolving? Going backwards in the evolutionary story, which of these critical organs do you reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications"?

@Roger__Wilco

2 жыл бұрын

@@michael9237 You can copy and paste that garbage all you want, doesn't change the fact that this film is garbage pseudoscience contributing to the dumbing down of education.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@Roger__Wilco With respect, at least this film presents a worldview that is internally inconsistent. Did you know that atheistic-Naturalists actually believe in *Supernatural* phenomena, they just usually don't realize it? The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.

@Roger__Wilco

2 жыл бұрын

@@michael9237 I don't care about any walls of texts full of complete nonsense that you want to paste or anything from "GotQuestions .org ", again this film is garbage pseudoscience contributing to the dumbing down of education.

@michael9237

2 жыл бұрын

@@Roger__Wilco I don't think you understand the problem my friend - it's your religious worldview that is the pseudoscience here, and I say that based on empirical evidence of you misrepresenting your worldview as "science." For example, consider the following which more clearly illustrates the difference: The Creation vs. Evolution (Naturalism) debate is not about "evidence," that is a common misunderstanding. In reality *both sides have the exact same evidence* , but the difference is that both sides interpret all of the evidence very differently. For example: Evidence) Consider DNA. Richard Dawkins said a single cell amoeba has 1000 Encyclopedia Brittanicas worth of information in its DNA. This DNA contains mass quantities of ordered, sequenced, encoded instructions for building everything in our body. For example, the eye has 40 million nerve endings, 137 million light sensitive cells, a lens, and its focusing muscles move 100,000 times a day to refract light just right in order to send a signal to your brain so you can "see." DNA contains ordered, sequenced, encoded instructions with agency that tell your organs how to grow including your eyes, your reproductive system which is built to interact with the reproductive system of the opposite gender, your voice, skin, hair, and everything else about you. Evolutionist claims of "junk DNA" were recently debunked by secular researchers. *Every single instance of information in existence always has an intelligent source.* Interpretations) Now consider what these two competing worldviews do with this same evidence. Creationists consider the eye an example of deliberate intelligent design, and consistently conclude that the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source: God. Naturalists look at the eye and assert that it is a random chemical reaction that evolved and created itself over billions of years, and the information in DNA somehow created itself out of non-information without an Intelligent Source in contrast to all the rest of the observable evidence. Intelligent human beings can't hope to even begin creating an eye, but naturalists (evolutionists) are okay with believing that an eye randomly spawned itself out of a puddle or off a geothermal vent at some point in history. Creationists accept the evidence at face value as evidence of an Intelligent Creator. Naturalists deny the observable evidence (information always has an intelligent source), and/or the ordered, sequenced, encoded nature of DNA, and/or that it contains instructions and acts with agency to tell an eye how to grow. Wouldn't it be more consistent with the observable evidence to conclude that the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source? Or maybe we should just deny that it's information at all as naturalists often do... the eye's lens, 137 million light sensitive cells, 40 million nerve endings, and precise muscles to focus this system are the product of fizzing chemicals over time. And meanwhile, *all of the best evidences of evolution can also be explained by Genesis 1-12* . Creationists and evolutionists both agree on speciation and environmental adaptation, but we disagree on macroevolution. Creationists believe that everything is created according to its kind, and this is why they recognize that we have no conclusive evidence of one "kind" changing into another "kind." It's also why Charles Darwin said "we see nothing of these slow changes in progress, until the hand of time has marked the lapse of the ages" and Richard Dawkins said "we are condemned to live only for a few decades, and that's too slow, too small a time scale to see evolution going on" (they're talking about "macroevolution"). Evolutionists overcome this by denying "kinds" altogether - fish evolve into philosophers and we are all related to bananas. This is not a debate over "evidence" ; it's a debate over worldviews concerning the exact same evidence, and that misunderstanding (on the evolutionist side) is part of the reason it's so hard for both sides to communicate with each other on this controversial topic. When creationists see the 122 anthropic constants, the problems concerning the Faint Young Sun Paradox, a long history of radical ad-hoc readjustment in the naturalist theories, the problem of hydrolysis if life emerged on a geothermal vent, geologically active Enceladus and Pluto which should long be dead celestial objects if billions of years old, the fact that the moon would have been touching the earth within the last 1.5 billion years based on calculations concerning the tidal recession of the moon, 100,000 year old max comets, the complex interdependent male and female reproductive systems and what it would have taken for them to evolve, young Carbon-14 in billions of year old sources, fully developed vertebrate creatures in the cambrian explosion, the fact that the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics don't allow the universe to "naturally" create itself, dozens of living fossils including wasps dragonflies salamanders the 70 million year extinct coelacanth, etc. etc. etc. Creationists see a solid case for creationism, and the plausibility of naturalism diminishes. Naturalists ignore the evidence, deny design, invoke supernatural phenomena like *Infinite* alternate universes to "naturally" (atheistically) explain our origins, fabricate entire celestial objects (Oort clouds), or erroneously argue "we don't know and that's okay" when the evidence actually seems to point to a natural impossibility or absurd probabilities (formation of the universe, formation of the earth) and/or an intelligent source (DNA)... and then they call it "science." Anyone who disagrees with them is a "science-denier." See the problem? Which worldview is really honestly evaluating the evidence, and which is selectively throwing out and stretching the evidence to fit their worldview? Two worldviews, two interpretations, exact same evidence.

I was blown away by the contradictions in the standard narrative. Thank you for sharing this.

I'm only 3 minutes in and I'm hooked. Very captivating way to open this movie! Bravo!

Отличный фильм! Огромная благодарность всем создателям фильма, обязательно покажу его своим детям)

@domagojbiskupic3807

7 ай бұрын

this is nonsense! who believes in these lies. these are melted buildings, stone and brick! compare it to Sodom and Gomorrah and you will see the difference or you won't!! no difference same forms! Ron Wyatt

@Quinoezi

5 ай бұрын

замечательно от людей, которые привезли нам Санта-Клюз

@daursan

2 ай бұрын

Действительно, согласен. Отличный фильм

@IsGenesisHistory

2 ай бұрын

Большое спасибо! Мы рады, что вам понравилось.

When this was on Netflix, my wife and I watched it 2x in a roll, back to back! AWESOME!

@Victor-lp6bp

4 жыл бұрын

Wow when did this go on Netflix?

@sukramwe

4 жыл бұрын

Was? Taken away?

@rickdavis2235

4 жыл бұрын

@didier yever Are you an atheist? If you are then you do care about the footstomping or you wouldn't be here watching a video about a book in the Bible. God bothers you a lot. He convicts you for your sin and He holds you accountable. You have to convince yourself that He doesn't exist so you can sleep at night.

@pomegranatepip2482

4 жыл бұрын

Rick Davis true statement brother. I’m an atheist. I’m here because religious people want to teach this crap as facts to my kids and destroy their ability to think independently and critically. That’s why I am here. To expose the dishonesty of a guy like this. It’s obvious when you look for it.

@harshwilly

4 жыл бұрын

@T Regis you don't know, they might have been taking a roll...

Satellite images prove the possibility of the sea he talks abt as that is what we would call that, not a giant lake, however those same images disprove his dam break theory. The presence of a prehistoric sea does not automatically prove Noahs flood. It simply points at the possibility of it.

Truly moving & possibly THE GREATEST documentary ive ever watched ,,loved evrything about it the music the animals the birds singing in the final stages ,,what a great programme ,,may god bless you 4 this and may i say THANKYOU,,for inspiring me & lifting my weary soul in a world filld with darkness this made me smile

Your insights are not timeless, but timely & awe inspiring