Another first amendment frauditor. Who can’t get a real job . Have to go harassing employees and people

@OmenOfficial

2 күн бұрын

@@Cookie_Monster424 Nobody was harassed 🤣

@Cookie_Monster424

Күн бұрын

@@OmenOfficial oh yes they were . When somebody tells you. They DO NOT WANT TO be filmed and you continue to do so. You are now harassing them and you should be held accountable.

@OmenOfficial

Күн бұрын

@@Cookie_Monster424 it’s to bad, they’re in public, there is no privacy in public

*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in Poster 7 concerning "Photography for News", it covers three "Subject Areas" (SA#) and two "Conditions" (C#) ;* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *Photographs for News (SA1), Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)* *(SA1)* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *(C1)* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *(C2 & SA2, SA3)* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _(The last sentence deals "Only" with _*_"(C2) Other photographs"_* _IE: _*_"Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* _The _*_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited" or is "being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes "that photographs may be taken."_ ▫️ _And note that:_ *(C1)* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*

Did nate give you 3 stamps ? He seemed cool to me.

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

It could’ve been just me but he seemed pissed off. He was cool tho. He actually gets 3 starts out of 5!

@bosatsu76

24 күн бұрын

@@OmenOfficial It WAS just you... He has an adult job, but had to tolerate a petulant child with no need for stamps beyond the excuse of trying to irritate him... Perhaps you could go film a motorcycle gang club meeting, or a KKK rally... Or a church pastor rallying the political votes for his favorite candidate... Something of actual value...

Plus anyone can get the footage from the post office and put it on line aswell

@OmenOfficial

20 күн бұрын

That’s true

@Cookie_Monster424

4 күн бұрын

They’re footage is for protection. Against criminals like This Moron

Why do auditors say "little" story?

AHHHH ITS A CAMERA! 💀

@OmenOfficial

21 күн бұрын

Runnnnn! 🏃

@Cookie_Monster424

Күн бұрын

@@DrPhil-nv5fg how would you like it If some one came and filmed your mother and posted her on YT?

When the post office employees actually understand what poster 7 says and means frauditors won't want to find it

@OmenOfficial

23 күн бұрын

This makes no sense

@mainid2490

17 күн бұрын

*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in Poster 7 concerning "Photography for News", it covers three "Subject Areas" (SA#) and two "Conditions" (C#) ;* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *Photographs for News (SA1), Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)* *(SA1)* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *(C1)* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *(C2 & SA2, SA3)* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _(The last sentence deals "Only" with _*_"(C2) Other photographs"_* _IE: _*_"Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* _The _*_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited" or is "being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes "that photographs may be taken."_ ▫️ _And note that:_ *(C1)* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*

@Cookie_Monster424

4 күн бұрын

@@OmenOfficial makes perfect sense. You’re just stupid to understand

Every one complains about auditors in the comments should get out of ur parents basement for a change

Darrr

Hey. Who wants to chat about the state of auditing????

❤

@OmenOfficial

26 күн бұрын

Much Love 🇺🇸❤️

You really went and spoke to a wall

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

You really went and watched my entire video. Thanks for view, it’s much appreciated. Leave a like while you’re at it

Do NO Post Office employees EVER read their OWN NOTICES !!

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

No they don’t.

@petermw88

24 күн бұрын

If they did they would stop the auditors in their tracks, have YOU read it? I'll help you... Photographs for news purposes may be taken in entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. Try the bit from "when used for"...

Whats the point in winding folks up for clicks

@warrenm374

24 күн бұрын

What's the point of people getting wound up over legal activities?

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

What’s the point of getting upset over a camera?

@AccidentalPreppper

23 күн бұрын

he doesnt do anything. the folks react all by themselves. he is not in control of other peoples emotions.

@shanemooney6118

23 күн бұрын

To make enough money to justify not having a job. Or friends. Or driving privileges.

@shanemooney6118

23 күн бұрын

@@AccidentalPreppperI love you guys who don’t do this yourselves act like this is something cool. You wouldn’t do this, you know better so just stop lol

And you are not happy because you didn't get the content you needed lol

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

Who ever said I’m not happy? I’m happy the post office didn’t try to violate my 1st Amendment Right

Why don't YOU read it? Read the very next bit about photographs.. You surely must have read it??

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

I read it! If I wasn’t allowed, they’d tell me, but they would be wrong, because we are allowed to take photos and videos in the post office where the public is allowed to be. If I were to be in an employee only section, I would then need to ask, if I can see it from the public area I can film it. You can’t ban eyes 👀

@petermw88

24 күн бұрын

@@OmenOfficial It doesn't say that. Nor does it mention public areas. Photographs for news purposes may be taken in entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. It stipulates that photos can be taken WHEN those areas are being used for public meetings. At all other time permission is required. Your 'you cannot trespass the eyes', becomes irrelevant, it is the camera you cannot use, you are free to look. With your eyes. Everything else is just people 'interpreting' words.. "This is what it means", no, it means just what it says.

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

@@petermw88 it doesn’t mention public areas? What is the lobby for then? It’s for the public 🤣. What’s the entrance for? So the public can get into the post office 🤣

@petermw88

24 күн бұрын

@@OmenOfficial The lobby may well be 'for the public', but not for photographs.. You are saying they don't tell you that you can't... the poster tells you that you can't. It says where you can... then gives a condition.. i.e. 'when you can'. You are ignoring the imposed condition. What really annoys me isn't that, itis when you tell an innocent person that THEY are wrong. It very much annoys me that neither the police nor PO employees know their own rules. They fail miserably.

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

@@petermw88 poster 7 says I can. It says it in the first sentence. Other is the key word you’re not understanding. Other Photos can be taken, where the employee only are allowed, so if I wanted to go in the back and take a photo, I would then need permission. Where the public is allowed I can record anything I see.

Usps is the absolute worst and needs to be shut down, but you sir need a life. 😂

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

I have a life, I’m living ❤️

@mainid2490

17 күн бұрын

Lol, have you looked at your life... You troll KZread looking for videos you don't like just to make lame comments... Mom must be proud.

@Cookie_Monster424

4 күн бұрын

@@OmenOfficialyou’re harassing that’s what you’re doing. And you’re going to get Your ass whooped very soon

You can't read.Why didn't you finish reading poster seven

@OmenOfficial

24 күн бұрын

There is no point after the point is proved that I can take photos and videos in public.

@mainid2490

17 күн бұрын

*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in Poster 7 concerning "Photography for News", it covers three "Subject Areas" (SA#) and two "Conditions" (C#) ;* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *Photographs for News (SA1), Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)* *(SA1)* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *(C1)* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *(C2 & SA2, SA3)* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _(The last sentence deals "Only" with _*_"(C2) Other photographs"_* _IE: _*_"Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* _The _*_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited" or is "being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes "that photographs may be taken."_ ▫️ _And note that:_ *(C1)* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*