Y is she working then should stay at home 24/7 never go out xos cameras r everywhere u go
@larrydh5415 күн бұрын
Maybe they have a lugge up their asd
@jamesbaumer173116 күн бұрын
Creeper.
@josephjones82517 күн бұрын
So harassing a woman you saw on some other frauditor channel is "investigative journalism". Absolute total LOSER.
@OmenOfficial17 күн бұрын
@@josephjones825 1. That’s not harassment. 2. You’re definitely a fan otherwise you wouldn’t be here 3. Facts don’t care about your feelings
@SalaciousCrmb14 күн бұрын
@@OmenOfficial You want to talk about facts? Fact: You DO NOT have an established 1st amendment right to film inside a post office. Courts have ruled on this. Fact: The Post Office has every right to trespass you for filming Fact: PLENTY of "auditors" have been arrested AND convicted for trespassing, and other crimes, when they refused to stop filming inside a post office Fact: There are THOUSANDS of videos showing "auditors" getting trespassed from post offices...probably in the tens of thousands. Yet not one single court has ever adjudicated the USPS guilty of violating an "auditors" rights. To this day post offices are trespassing "auditors." Most reasonable people will conclude the garbage you parrot, because you saw it on YT, is nothing more than misinformation.
@OmenOfficial14 күн бұрын
@@SalaciousCrmb Thanks for the view, it’s much appreciated 🇺🇸
@SalaciousCrmb14 күн бұрын
@@OmenOfficial Seriously, why do you think there are thousands and thousands of videos showing 'auditors' being trespassed from post offices and NONE OF THEM have ever successfully sued? Why is that you think? Why are courts and appeals courts convicting people for what you claim can't be done (such as being trespassed)?? Is it maybe you've been mislead?
@OmenOfficial14 күн бұрын
@@SalaciousCrmb Poster 7 says otherwise. If we weren’t allowed it wouldn’t be there.
@legalalien0217 күн бұрын
the irony is that she is probably under surveillance video camera while at work, when she enters a shopping a center, and even on random streets.
@OmenOfficial17 күн бұрын
@@legalalien02 even more ironic the fact she’s a Public Servant and doesn’t know the Public can record
@marknewton698414 күн бұрын
Not to mention restaurants... 😮
@pwaffle17 күн бұрын
Um, try this at a USPS on the West or South Side of Chicago and see how it goes.
@OmenOfficial17 күн бұрын
@@pwaffle it will be go the same or different, besides from getting a piece pulled on me
@josephjones82517 күн бұрын
@@OmenOfficialDeservedly so
@godnah17 күн бұрын
Take some pointers from my guy Too Apree, I think he's got the best angle on 1st amendment auditing
@SanchezQuezalte17 күн бұрын
Why are this Philipinos taking over our Post Office?
@mermer-zq1mj17 күн бұрын
more people with no real lives bothering people who are working. another frauditor who just copies other people. get a life dude
@joethomasbiden18 күн бұрын
Not very well spoken in this audit sir, speaking like a true redneck!
@susanoogn18 күн бұрын
This seems very democratic if you ask me
@joethomasbiden18 күн бұрын
god awful
@OmenOfficial18 күн бұрын
And you watched it 😘
@joethomasbiden18 күн бұрын
unbelievable
@scarxuy274617 күн бұрын
whats unbelievable?
@neverknownas118 күн бұрын
So you saw her in another video and chose to target her? Creepy af
@OmenOfficial18 күн бұрын
How am I supposed to know she was working that day?
@neverknownas117 күн бұрын
@@OmenOfficial you aren't but I bet you were hoping she was 😂 weirdo
@josephjones82517 күн бұрын
@@OmenOfficialInstructions for filing a privacy strike with KZread have been forwarded.
@OmenOfficial17 күн бұрын
@@josephjones825 Thanks for the view, it’s much appreciated 🇺🇸
@rob1016ny18 күн бұрын
Dude. There really isn’t a need to bother people at work for no reason. It’s just creepy from a woman’s perspective man. Have a little respect. She asked you nicely man. You’re such a loser. You gotta record getting stamps. Show this to your Mom and be like. I did good right Ma? Jeez bro. You def got her so good.
@todddoetken259418 күн бұрын
It appears that being camera shy is a requirement for employment at the USPS.
@abcxyz-lj3pk18 күн бұрын
she should not work in a public place if she has a problem with getting recorded, lol. wait until she learns that the CCTV is recording her all the time while working
@cjchickenbeakesq761818 күн бұрын
@abcxyz-lj3pk, Wait until she is notified about how to privacy strike this video.
@abcxyz-lj3pk18 күн бұрын
@@cjchickenbeakesq7618 there is no expectation of privacy in public
@cjchickenbeakesq761818 күн бұрын
@@abcxyz-lj3pk You know nothing of utoob TOS and the DMCA. Folks get privacy strikrs and videos are removed daily. Utoob is not pooblic child. It is a private platform.
@jeromejackson201819 күн бұрын
It's a camera.... not a gun. Grow up!!! Glad Disney patrons don't have your mentality!
@OmenOfficial19 күн бұрын
@@jeromejackson2018 She’s been through that many times before. I recognized her from Tyrant Terminators Audits there.
@josephjones82517 күн бұрын
@@OmenOfficialAnd you chose to add to the harassment, you siece of phit!
@cinimatics20 күн бұрын
There sure are alot of mentally ill people pretending this is some kind of public service isnt there? Stop harrasing people and get a real job.
@cinimatics20 күн бұрын
People who do this dont fundamentally understand what the first amendment even is. This is just a certian demographic of mentally ill people harrassing public employees just becuase they can. "First amendment auditor" isn't a profession. But people make being crazy a full time job.
@cinimatics20 күн бұрын
"First amendment auditor" is a funny way to say you're an unemployed jerkoff.
@cinimatics20 күн бұрын
So what are you doing besides harrasing people?
@zerocool188421 күн бұрын
Bring back Pizza & Pipes
@ourrightsmatter15421 күн бұрын
Good audit, thanks for what you do!!🤟😁
@OmenOfficial21 күн бұрын
@@ourrightsmatter154 Thank You! I appreciate that 🇺🇸🦅
@wallacebrucker158421 күн бұрын
This looks like a very well cared for library in what appears to be amnice town. Mit is too bad to be"suhbjected " to this treatment by an "auditor" andf for. What purpose ?
@OmenOfficial21 күн бұрын
@@wallacebrucker1584 why not?
@YoutubehatesConservatives22 күн бұрын
Awww, someone's upset... 😠 ❄️
@mainid249025 күн бұрын
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
@cinimatics20 күн бұрын
Who cares?
@mainid249025 күн бұрын
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
@mainid249025 күн бұрын
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
@mainid249025 күн бұрын
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
@zerocool188426 күн бұрын
Funny to see these idiots complaining no one is violating your rights when they cry on the other videos about rights being violated lol
@DarkRaven456126 күн бұрын
One thing you need to learn before you go any further with your auditing career - the Forum Doctrine, Post Offices and libraries are limited public forums, which means you have no right to audiovisual recording. Poster 7 actually prohibits filming and photography without express permission. Try reading it.
@OmenOfficial26 күн бұрын
@@DarkRaven4561 yawn 🥱 you’re wrong.
@DarkRaven456126 күн бұрын
@@OmenOfficial actually, I’m not wrong. It’s so very easy to look it up, rather than pay heed to the other so-called first amendment auditors. Why do you think they keep getting trespassed, or removed from such places?
@OmenOfficial26 күн бұрын
@@DarkRaven4561 you’re wrong, but I appreciate the view! It’s much appreciated
@zerocool188426 күн бұрын
Are you mentally challenged? Photographs for News, Advertising, or Commercial Purposes Photographs for news purposes may be taken in entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head.
@mainid249025 күн бұрын
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
@itgoestoeleven27 күн бұрын
YAWN. When one has no life, one grabs a camera and looks for opportunities to be stupid.
@OmenOfficial27 күн бұрын
@@itgoestoeleven Thanks for the view, it’s much appreciated
@zerocool188426 күн бұрын
you speak from experience
@mainid249025 күн бұрын
And the others live in KZread... Your mom must be so proud.
@researcher398127 күн бұрын
You did everything correctly, especially giving the date, which is needed for those of us who like to complain, when employees get out of line. And when in large city with many Post Offices, give the address or at least photo shoot the address on the door.
@OmenOfficial27 күн бұрын
@@researcher3981 Thank You!
@brokglas29 күн бұрын
Gosh, I hope that your library audit will be as SPELLBINDING as this one.
@OmenOfficial29 күн бұрын
@@brokglas maybe 🤔
@Texas_Gal_Audits29 күн бұрын
You should come to Texas and come work with Bz Watchdog and I
@OmenOfficial29 күн бұрын
@@Texas_Gal_Audits I’d love that, I can plan a trip out there for sure.
@OmenOfficial29 күн бұрын
@@Texas_Gal_Audits I’ve only been to Texas, once, and that was a stop at the Houston Airport, never really experienced Texas.
@Texas_Gal_Audits28 күн бұрын
@@OmenOfficial we have a fun crew of folks here in Texas
@OmenOfficial28 күн бұрын
@@Texas_Gal_Audits We’ll have to plan something for me to come out there
@deonjackson2224Ай бұрын
Great audit
@OmenOfficialАй бұрын
@@deonjackson2224 Thank You! I wish there was somebody I could Audit With!
@debbiemcdermott31728 күн бұрын
@@OmenOfficialy don't u get hold of some of the auditors near u and see if u can do one with them
@OmenOfficial8 күн бұрын
@@debbiemcdermott3172 I don’t know if there is any near me. I’m sure there is tho
@Cookie-Monster401Ай бұрын
Do you go into public bathrooms 🚽 filming people do their stuff ?
@OmenOfficialАй бұрын
@@Cookie-Monster401 A Post Office isn’t a bathroom.
@Cookie-Monster401Ай бұрын
@@OmenOfficial but the post office Is PUBLIC. And so is the bathroom. “Public bathroom “. So why don’t you go there and film people doing their things ?
@OmenOfficialАй бұрын
@@Cookie-Monster401 So why are you complaining? 🤣
@Cookie-Monster401Ай бұрын
@@OmenOfficial I’m not complaining I’m just showing your hypocrisy
@OmenOfficialАй бұрын
@@Cookie-Monster401 it’s illegal to take a video in a bathroom, It’s not illegal to video in a Post Office. Cry somewhere else 🇺🇸
@koski6150Ай бұрын
why did you even post this? get a life.
@josephjones825Ай бұрын
"Investigative journalism" 😂 Did you make sure to buy ONE stamp, frauditor ???
@OmenOfficialАй бұрын
@@josephjones825 Thanks for the view, it’s much appreciated 🇺🇸
@blacktipstudios4789Ай бұрын
How is he a Frauditor?
@DD-bu1kgАй бұрын
Morons.
@augustusmilligan9244Ай бұрын
Hahaha, you didn't get a reaction for being an a-hole!!! 🤣
@rubymontague2680Ай бұрын
And that is how it should be
@1forensicfanАй бұрын
Stupid
@Cookie-Monster401Ай бұрын
Another first amendment frauditor. Who can’t get a real job . Have to go harassing employees and people
@OmenOfficialАй бұрын
@@Cookie-Monster401 Nobody was harassed 🤣
@Cookie-Monster401Ай бұрын
@@OmenOfficial oh yes they were . When somebody tells you. They DO NOT WANT TO be filmed and you continue to do so. You are now harassing them and you should be held accountable.
@OmenOfficialАй бұрын
@@Cookie-Monster401 it’s to bad, they’re in public, there is no privacy in public
@funkyjunkyjai29 күн бұрын
@@Cookie-Monster401They can say whatever they want, but they can't enforce their feelings. They're out in public and can be filmed. People need to learn.
@cinimatics20 күн бұрын
@funkyjunkyjai you didn't get beat up enough as a kid.
@Cookie-Monster401Ай бұрын
Why do you only go to post offices ?? Try going to DHS offices FBI OFFICES OR DMV. see how that goes. You frauditor
@gilly2badАй бұрын
Another Frauditor wasting people's time. Get a job..
@donaldchapman5466Ай бұрын
POST OFFICE POSTER NUMBER SEVEN. Have any of the STAFF read it. ??
@OmenOfficialАй бұрын
@@donaldchapman5466 I’m sure they have since the first visit they got from me. I’ll be here at this location in the future.
Пікірлер
Y is she working then should stay at home 24/7 never go out xos cameras r everywhere u go
Maybe they have a lugge up their asd
Creeper.
So harassing a woman you saw on some other frauditor channel is "investigative journalism". Absolute total LOSER.
@@josephjones825 1. That’s not harassment. 2. You’re definitely a fan otherwise you wouldn’t be here 3. Facts don’t care about your feelings
@@OmenOfficial You want to talk about facts? Fact: You DO NOT have an established 1st amendment right to film inside a post office. Courts have ruled on this. Fact: The Post Office has every right to trespass you for filming Fact: PLENTY of "auditors" have been arrested AND convicted for trespassing, and other crimes, when they refused to stop filming inside a post office Fact: There are THOUSANDS of videos showing "auditors" getting trespassed from post offices...probably in the tens of thousands. Yet not one single court has ever adjudicated the USPS guilty of violating an "auditors" rights. To this day post offices are trespassing "auditors." Most reasonable people will conclude the garbage you parrot, because you saw it on YT, is nothing more than misinformation.
@@SalaciousCrmb Thanks for the view, it’s much appreciated 🇺🇸
@@OmenOfficial Seriously, why do you think there are thousands and thousands of videos showing 'auditors' being trespassed from post offices and NONE OF THEM have ever successfully sued? Why is that you think? Why are courts and appeals courts convicting people for what you claim can't be done (such as being trespassed)?? Is it maybe you've been mislead?
@@SalaciousCrmb Poster 7 says otherwise. If we weren’t allowed it wouldn’t be there.
the irony is that she is probably under surveillance video camera while at work, when she enters a shopping a center, and even on random streets.
@@legalalien02 even more ironic the fact she’s a Public Servant and doesn’t know the Public can record
Not to mention restaurants... 😮
Um, try this at a USPS on the West or South Side of Chicago and see how it goes.
@@pwaffle it will be go the same or different, besides from getting a piece pulled on me
@@OmenOfficialDeservedly so
Take some pointers from my guy Too Apree, I think he's got the best angle on 1st amendment auditing
Why are this Philipinos taking over our Post Office?
more people with no real lives bothering people who are working. another frauditor who just copies other people. get a life dude
Not very well spoken in this audit sir, speaking like a true redneck!
This seems very democratic if you ask me
god awful
And you watched it 😘
unbelievable
whats unbelievable?
So you saw her in another video and chose to target her? Creepy af
How am I supposed to know she was working that day?
@@OmenOfficial you aren't but I bet you were hoping she was 😂 weirdo
@@OmenOfficialInstructions for filing a privacy strike with KZread have been forwarded.
@@josephjones825 Thanks for the view, it’s much appreciated 🇺🇸
Dude. There really isn’t a need to bother people at work for no reason. It’s just creepy from a woman’s perspective man. Have a little respect. She asked you nicely man. You’re such a loser. You gotta record getting stamps. Show this to your Mom and be like. I did good right Ma? Jeez bro. You def got her so good.
It appears that being camera shy is a requirement for employment at the USPS.
she should not work in a public place if she has a problem with getting recorded, lol. wait until she learns that the CCTV is recording her all the time while working
@abcxyz-lj3pk, Wait until she is notified about how to privacy strike this video.
@@cjchickenbeakesq7618 there is no expectation of privacy in public
@@abcxyz-lj3pk You know nothing of utoob TOS and the DMCA. Folks get privacy strikrs and videos are removed daily. Utoob is not pooblic child. It is a private platform.
It's a camera.... not a gun. Grow up!!! Glad Disney patrons don't have your mentality!
@@jeromejackson2018 She’s been through that many times before. I recognized her from Tyrant Terminators Audits there.
@@OmenOfficialAnd you chose to add to the harassment, you siece of phit!
There sure are alot of mentally ill people pretending this is some kind of public service isnt there? Stop harrasing people and get a real job.
People who do this dont fundamentally understand what the first amendment even is. This is just a certian demographic of mentally ill people harrassing public employees just becuase they can. "First amendment auditor" isn't a profession. But people make being crazy a full time job.
"First amendment auditor" is a funny way to say you're an unemployed jerkoff.
So what are you doing besides harrasing people?
Bring back Pizza & Pipes
Good audit, thanks for what you do!!🤟😁
@@ourrightsmatter154 Thank You! I appreciate that 🇺🇸🦅
This looks like a very well cared for library in what appears to be amnice town. Mit is too bad to be"suhbjected " to this treatment by an "auditor" andf for. What purpose ?
@@wallacebrucker1584 why not?
Awww, someone's upset... 😠 ❄️
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
Who cares?
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
Funny to see these idiots complaining no one is violating your rights when they cry on the other videos about rights being violated lol
One thing you need to learn before you go any further with your auditing career - the Forum Doctrine, Post Offices and libraries are limited public forums, which means you have no right to audiovisual recording. Poster 7 actually prohibits filming and photography without express permission. Try reading it.
@@DarkRaven4561 yawn 🥱 you’re wrong.
@@OmenOfficial actually, I’m not wrong. It’s so very easy to look it up, rather than pay heed to the other so-called first amendment auditors. Why do you think they keep getting trespassed, or removed from such places?
@@DarkRaven4561 you’re wrong, but I appreciate the view! It’s much appreciated
Are you mentally challenged? Photographs for News, Advertising, or Commercial Purposes Photographs for news purposes may be taken in entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head.
*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm10s kzread.info/dash/bejne/poiktpmNZ5qqhLg.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/po59vMSll8vbmso.htmlm00s kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXqd0Zmceci4o8o.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2GEzciEl73SiaQ.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*
YAWN. When one has no life, one grabs a camera and looks for opportunities to be stupid.
@@itgoestoeleven Thanks for the view, it’s much appreciated
you speak from experience
And the others live in KZread... Your mom must be so proud.
You did everything correctly, especially giving the date, which is needed for those of us who like to complain, when employees get out of line. And when in large city with many Post Offices, give the address or at least photo shoot the address on the door.
@@researcher3981 Thank You!
Gosh, I hope that your library audit will be as SPELLBINDING as this one.
@@brokglas maybe 🤔
You should come to Texas and come work with Bz Watchdog and I
@@Texas_Gal_Audits I’d love that, I can plan a trip out there for sure.
@@Texas_Gal_Audits I’ve only been to Texas, once, and that was a stop at the Houston Airport, never really experienced Texas.
@@OmenOfficial we have a fun crew of folks here in Texas
@@Texas_Gal_Audits We’ll have to plan something for me to come out there
Great audit
@@deonjackson2224 Thank You! I wish there was somebody I could Audit With!
@@OmenOfficialy don't u get hold of some of the auditors near u and see if u can do one with them
@@debbiemcdermott3172 I don’t know if there is any near me. I’m sure there is tho
Do you go into public bathrooms 🚽 filming people do their stuff ?
@@Cookie-Monster401 A Post Office isn’t a bathroom.
@@OmenOfficial but the post office Is PUBLIC. And so is the bathroom. “Public bathroom “. So why don’t you go there and film people doing their things ?
@@Cookie-Monster401 So why are you complaining? 🤣
@@OmenOfficial I’m not complaining I’m just showing your hypocrisy
@@Cookie-Monster401 it’s illegal to take a video in a bathroom, It’s not illegal to video in a Post Office. Cry somewhere else 🇺🇸
why did you even post this? get a life.
"Investigative journalism" 😂 Did you make sure to buy ONE stamp, frauditor ???
@@josephjones825 Thanks for the view, it’s much appreciated 🇺🇸
How is he a Frauditor?
Morons.
Hahaha, you didn't get a reaction for being an a-hole!!! 🤣
And that is how it should be
Stupid
Another first amendment frauditor. Who can’t get a real job . Have to go harassing employees and people
@@Cookie-Monster401 Nobody was harassed 🤣
@@OmenOfficial oh yes they were . When somebody tells you. They DO NOT WANT TO be filmed and you continue to do so. You are now harassing them and you should be held accountable.
@@Cookie-Monster401 it’s to bad, they’re in public, there is no privacy in public
@@Cookie-Monster401They can say whatever they want, but they can't enforce their feelings. They're out in public and can be filmed. People need to learn.
@funkyjunkyjai you didn't get beat up enough as a kid.
Why do you only go to post offices ?? Try going to DHS offices FBI OFFICES OR DMV. see how that goes. You frauditor
Another Frauditor wasting people's time. Get a job..
POST OFFICE POSTER NUMBER SEVEN. Have any of the STAFF read it. ??
@@donaldchapman5466 I’m sure they have since the first visit they got from me. I’ll be here at this location in the future.