These two are very unqualified, Why haven't they had any cases concerning the Constitution. Isn't that a criteria for a Supreme Court Justice???

@cunctator6843

2 жыл бұрын

so you don't know anything?

@chuckheart41

2 жыл бұрын

Ask Trump, McConnell and there supreme court nominees. By your definition none of them were qualified. And neither was Clarence Thomas. Imagine that 4 unqualified judges sitting on the supreme court and all republican appointees. Now you got me worried as I never considered this. Thank you!

@jameshouston5017

2 жыл бұрын

@@chuckheart41 ! You wouldn't be saying shit if it was a democrat nominee

@chuckheart41

2 жыл бұрын

@@jameshouston5017 Yes I would if the nominee had no work experience like a lot of the Trump, McConnell nominees. But the problem for republicans is this nominee is very "WELL" qualified and they know it.

@jameshouston5017

2 жыл бұрын

@@chuckheart41 ! No more liberals on the Supreme Court !

Odd how their personal views are never appropriate ONLY when asked by a republican in a hearing...otherwise they have No Problems sharing their views

@metalman5403

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.infoyejzUKVPO-U?feature=share

@barbybubbles314

2 жыл бұрын

It's obvious you have never watched a hearing on judges being accepted into the supreme Court. Because those personal views are asked by both parties to ALL people up for the position of supreme Court judge SHOWS YOUR BIAS AND PARTISAN POINT OF VIEW 🤨🧐😂🤣

@fioremd7722

2 жыл бұрын

ABSOLUTELY TRUE and HYPOCRITIC for the DEMOC-RATS.

@triplebbb1484

2 жыл бұрын

These judges won’t have to dodge the questions if the Republicans only asked them easy questions. Did you ever considered that?

@charlesquick3091

2 жыл бұрын

@@triplebbb1484 What?

Uh... that means both of them do not believe in religious liberty, according to the Constitution. The Constitution also states, " SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, PERIOD"

@bombomos

2 жыл бұрын

Depends on the liberty. Someone religions says killing women is okay. I would want to infringe on that liberty

@mariamejia4969

2 жыл бұрын

Sen Manchin is taking notes

@johnnieblackburn3182

2 жыл бұрын

@@GlennC789 Our 2nd Amendment rights.

@johnnieblackburn3182

2 жыл бұрын

@@GlennC789 Hey ... the crazy Demonkkkrats have been looking to enroll you on their side. Better hurry.

I don't care if she gets it or not my black ass is never voting Democratic party again.

@TimTimmay

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed, my almond ass won’t be voting democrat ever again

@pro-choicemom

2 жыл бұрын

Ok fake account! Why is the Republican party made up of over 90% white & majority male?

@Jay-Tries-Everything

2 жыл бұрын

You are a white dude though... 😆

@albundy7623

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks from a Canadian ice rat

@pumared1817

2 жыл бұрын

👍🏽

Outstanding questions as to their interpretation of the amendments.

@PageMarker1

2 жыл бұрын

BS answers.

@Mike-fo3qh

2 жыл бұрын

Just like colton's interpretation of the civil war, I'm guessing.

@paulskopic5844

2 жыл бұрын

And word salad responses.

@scottcampbell2585

2 жыл бұрын

Article 3 gives NO interpretation powers to the Supreme Court. They serve in good behavior or they can be impeached. This includes all federal government appointments.

@PageMarker1

2 жыл бұрын

@@scottcampbell2585 Seems you are correct, that can of worms remains unopened. 'Judicial Review' is not something Hamilton or Jefferson supported.

Judge Jackson is a hard NO…..next….

@marilyncoyne4034

2 жыл бұрын

Lady in pink blouse is way more intelligent

@Mike-fo3qh

2 жыл бұрын

Because???

Vote NO how many times do We need to be lied to by these corrupt judges

@Mike-fo3qh

2 жыл бұрын

WAIT!!! The one's on the right don't lie. They're Christians. Right.....

@ritab-c492

2 жыл бұрын

biden chooses liberal woke activists who support criminals, not the law and victims. These two didn't seem as obvious, but the past ones all but came right and said it.

@Mike-fo3qh

2 жыл бұрын

@@ritab-c492 YEAH!!! just not people who rape others. Damn it. Soooo disappointed.

@dalspartan

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe we can use mail-in ballots?

@metalman5403

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.infoyejzUKVPO-U?feature=share

“… nine justices and that justices should not be added ? “ . Hark ! A straight “ Yes “ or “ No” answer to a specific question seems SO complicated and difficult for SOME nominees, knowing that HONESTY might reveal personal attitude.

@kimhansen9124

2 жыл бұрын

Truth be said here. It's really refreshing TRUTH.

I wouldn't consider either one of these ACTIVIST for Supreme justices.

@napoleonruss1528

2 жыл бұрын

Good thing that you are not in a position to make a decision on this.

@darkheart407

2 жыл бұрын

Too late so were all F*cked and its pretty scary. lol

@napoleonruss1528

2 жыл бұрын

@@darkheart407 what’s so scary about it. We’ve had 37 “unqualified “ racist white men on the bench and we survived them. I think that we will survive a single black woman on the bench.

@ArkansasSquaw

2 жыл бұрын

@@napoleonruss1528 racist? Lol, that's a stretch. Explain Clarence Thomad then please, given he is the most conservative judge in the Supreme Court.

@ArkansasSquaw

2 жыл бұрын

Neither will get appointed. Just watch. This is nothing more than a dog and pony show. We still have a few good ones left in Congress (thank you Cruz and Cotton, Goetz, etc) they will prevent it.

Hundreds of people that were more highly qualified for the job. Today's world you cannot have your own opinion and you will be called a racist. Bizarro world

@blackredneck4378

2 жыл бұрын

But they weren't picked, sounds familiar. Meaning unqualified white had been pick over qualified Blacks in the pass.

@ShomariTomlinson

2 жыл бұрын

Like who?

@napoleonruss1528

2 жыл бұрын

You can express your opinion all that you want.. just understand that if you spew racist sentiments then you have proven yourself to be a racist and shouldn’t be that surprised when people label you as such.

If Biden nominated her, she's gotta be left of left, but that Jackson-Akiwumi doesn't duck and dodge like so many of them. I'd vote no based solely who nominated her. Nothing personal.

@Mike-fo3qh

2 жыл бұрын

Even if they raped individuals. 👏👏👏👏👏👏 Dont take it personally.

@marilyncoyne4034

2 жыл бұрын

Obama nominee when Harry Reid and his then aid Faiz Shakir later Bernie’s camp mgr installed a radical DC court. Now Pakistani PM in Russia taking about RUS CH India and Pakistani oil and gas lines

@Mike-fo3qh

2 жыл бұрын

@@marilyncoyne4034 Hey marilyn, could make a little more sense please.

@metalman5403

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.infoyejzUKVPO-U?feature=share

@jimmorrison3830

2 жыл бұрын

Barack nominated her

Big No. Talk around the questions. No truth in replys

@frankelizalde9306

2 жыл бұрын

“ Talk around the question “ is out wrong slither DITHER , done by those nominees that ACT indecisive. They KNOW that they will practice devious ACTIVISM.

They seem to be helping each other, or almost "teaming up" to assuage Sen. Cotton with milk toast answers.

@GokulOnFire

2 жыл бұрын

Well actually the other lady gave fantastic answers, her answers implied judicial activism but unlike 90% of nominees who give piss poor answers she tactfully answered em. Jackson was lucky coz all she had to do was repeat her.

@bobbyboucher187

2 жыл бұрын

I thought their answers were thoughtful. Much better than many other highlights we see from Forbes.

@GokulOnFire

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobbyboucher187 but it was the other lady who gave those - I wouldn't say thoughtful but tactful answers. The SCOTUS pick was lucky to be following her. And Cotton should've asked her first coz by that time itself she was under consideration.

@bobbyboucher187

2 жыл бұрын

@@GokulOnFire True. The other nominee gave more thorough answers. That being said, this clip didn't disappoint me like the other ones I've seen.

@Sinsteel

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobbyboucher187 Thoughtful or not, they deliberately failed to give any insight on how they would actually be as judges. Words are cheap, their past record is what's important.

Vote NO on these judges..

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

Vote Yes 🙌🏿

@exdemocrat9038

2 жыл бұрын

Either of these 2 Radical Democrat Terrorists do not belong on the Supreme Court. It's not about color it's about their ideology. I would love to see all Supreme Court justices look and think like Justice Clarence Thomas.

@tarabay9297

2 жыл бұрын

One PERVERTED, ONE RACIST got through why not let this one's pass they look OVER QUALIFIED and...you just say no because they don't have PEDOPHILE or PREDATOR rap sheed right?

When skin color and gender are more important than qualifications and loyalty to the Constitution, our country can never reach its full potential. At least Ketanji's got nice teeth.

@mikew2610

2 жыл бұрын

It hasn't reached it's full potential because skin color and gender has and had superseded qualifications. Don't be naive because you know.

@napoleonruss1528

2 жыл бұрын

Hmmm. Given that for the first 200 years Of this countries existence,skin color was a major factor in American politics and government with preferential treatment given to the white men and skin color barred black and brown people from participation in our “democracy”, I think that this country will survive a period when those “white affirmative action” programs are no longer the norm

@jimgallagher2979

2 жыл бұрын

@@napoleonruss1528 Hmmm. But were those white men better qualified? Shouldn't that always be the criteria if you're going to be your best as a country is my point?

@napoleonruss1528

2 жыл бұрын

@@jimgallagher2979 37 of those white men had no experience on the bench. That was 200 years if untethered “affirmative action” for mediocre unqualified white men. But forget the history when it’s inconvenient to you.

@mikew2610

2 жыл бұрын

@@jimgallagher2979 Small history lesson. Negro Act of 1740 made it illegal for blacks to learn how to read and write, grow their own food, earn money, etc. Since then there have been barriers put in place. Yet people ignore that and question qualifications. Also, if you over 30 you should know through life experience the most qualified don't always the get job.

“Do you believe the Second Amendment….” “The Supreme Court has said that clearly” -wrong answer….

@NOTHERE2CODDLEU

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed

@rangersmith4652

2 жыл бұрын

Bound by precedent? No. Influenced by it, but not bound.

@johnhumphrey9953

2 жыл бұрын

@@rangersmith4652 you better go back to law school.

@rangersmith4652

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnhumphrey9953 If the court system were bound by precedent, there would be no way to reverse a poor ruling. What purpose would such a system serve?

@johnhumphrey9953

2 жыл бұрын

@@rangersmith4652 you still need to go back to law school

And that’s a candidate for the supreme court of the United States. Vote no..!!

@jimaalex2656

2 жыл бұрын

You wanna bet? Keep crying and whining cos that black woman is going to sit on that supreme court and you can't do sh**t about it.

Illegitimate pResident nominating someone for their skin color.

@Angel0fTruth

2 жыл бұрын

The sad thing is this particular justice will always be remembered as the one that got this position based upon her skin color first and foremost. 😞

@muddhammer7834

2 жыл бұрын

And thats against the law

@vickieroberts9560

2 жыл бұрын

I'm not against anyone who is fully qualified. Let's hope and PRAY that the most qualified will prevail.

@ericsniper9843

2 жыл бұрын

@@vickieroberts9560 you know these women are highly qualified.

@ericsniper9843

2 жыл бұрын

How is he illegitimate? Didn't he win both the popular and electoral vote? I don't recall any foreign government attempting to influence the outcome of the election for Biden.

Any Supreme Court nominee, that utters the phrase "the cause," should automatically be withdrawn from consideration.

@DanielleKingdjdinosaur

2 жыл бұрын

hhhmm no when its the cause of freedom ,justice,equality ,democracy and the rule of law .all part of the cause

@yahtotv5492

2 жыл бұрын

Any Supreme Court nominee picked based off the color of their skin, their ability to follow orders, and promote racism as a poverty pimp puppet then they should be rejected.

@andrewmckenzie292

2 жыл бұрын

Do you guys have "the cause of justice" charge in US though? Stupid charge that should not exist...implies judiciary acts in a political capacity in that instance.

@hoaxnineteen

2 жыл бұрын

ANYONE CHOSEN BECAUSE THEY A BLACK FEMALE SHOULD BE WITHDRAWN

@marvincrooker1551

2 жыл бұрын

Open your ears , she said the clause. Referring to neutral law.

Why do her rulings keep getting overturned?

@chrisbaker528

2 жыл бұрын

She's biased.

@timbrock2785

2 жыл бұрын

Yep

@honeybld67

2 жыл бұрын

Judicial overreach

When a Lawyer and specially a Democraptic Lawyer a straight forward question, they never ever answer it as asked.

@greghall9410

2 жыл бұрын

BLM is also a terrorist group

@HonestTakesAll

2 жыл бұрын

These two nominees have answered questions quite well compared to most of the radical nominees we’ve seen prior.

@deweyseymour4268

2 жыл бұрын

BLM is NOT a Terrorist Group

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

@@greghall9410 😂🤡

@CowboySanta

2 жыл бұрын

@@deweyseymour4268 As declared by founder, It is a Marxists organization! And members of the group HAVE committed terrorists acts! Cannot be truthfully denied!

We need a strong, black voice, in a woman, in the place of say, Lindsey Graham in the GOP. Someone like Candice Owen's to question the left's contenders.

@breakthroughnow7841

2 жыл бұрын

Candace Owens is that all the conservatives have to represent them? Is she the Republicans Black woman pitbull because they're not brave enough to ask difficult questions? Candace is an Oreo she thinks she's too good to marry a Black man.

@tedpoplawski4325

2 жыл бұрын

@@breakthroughnow7841 LOL…WOW..

@terryrose6208

2 жыл бұрын

@@breakthroughnow7841 You're spewing hate and division. Candace would make a great representative in Congress or the Senate.

@DanielleKingdjdinosaur

2 жыл бұрын

that woman isnt really black she is just pretending .candice its ok if you want to be white theres lots of places that do a good bleaching job.Strong is not a word i would use with candice.Crazy,blind ,stupid,Those are the words that spring to mind with candice

@johnsteward132

2 жыл бұрын

@@breakthroughnow7841 Shame on you. Cheap shot.

I can see his choice, of color over quality, for VP, has helped get us where we are today.

@butchstaz5109

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah what happened to the best person for the job. Let’s see 13% of Americans are black. Of that 13% how many went to college let alone law school And became a judge. This administration is a joke

@bodini8416

2 жыл бұрын

Heels up was Osama’s pick

@robbieb4219

2 жыл бұрын

YEP IT'S RUINED THIS COUNTRY!!!!!

@Bugkiller08

2 жыл бұрын

They love to cry diversity. But, diversity didn't matter when Winsome Sears won the state attorney office in Virginia.

@lajunewhitney7415

2 жыл бұрын

@@butchstaz5109 everyone of them are highly qualified. They wouldn’t be there. Your ignorance is profound

If that question," Does the US Constitution allow anyone to be treated differently because of their race?", has any merit whatsoever than why are these nominees here for anything other than their race and gender. Seems to me that they are here because of their race. That is why there are no nominees ALLOWED here that have a SKIN COLOR lighter than a certain shade of brown. No matter who is picked for this SCOTUS position it will be because of their skin color and gender and NOT because they are the most qualified. Another example of the left keeping racism alive and pounding you on the head with it if you dare disagree with them. If you are called a racist it does NOT mean you discriminate. It means that you disagree with them, you are a 'racist' despite your skin color. So if Larry Elder can be 'The black face of white supremacy', than what the hell is this if not racism?

@rustytrombone8011

2 жыл бұрын

because they are qualified. here's a question...if people haven't been treated differently because of their race, whey was the court made up solely of white men until Thurgood Marshall was named to the bench? Think it out paul clown...I'll wait.

@joecarreiro1

2 жыл бұрын

@@rustytrombone8011 so you think Sotomayor is qualified?

@carloshathcock6371

2 жыл бұрын

@@rustytrombone8011 cry cr cry

@rustytrombone8011

2 жыл бұрын

@@carloshathcock6371 in his yap

@cajunstrat

2 жыл бұрын

Spot on!

There is not, & never will be any limits on any of our God-Given Constitutional Rights, & Civil Liberties that we the people have. Anyone who believes there should be, & that there are limits. They should not be able or allowed to be on the supreme Court or in government period.

@nullentry6032

2 жыл бұрын

Natural Rights and "Civil Liberties" really means forcing some people to work for other people using government force. It used to be a right to refuse service for any reason. Now that Civil Rights regime has become a Forced Contracting regime that now empowers LGBT to make you participate in their religious events as workers. Using this power they target Christians only to force them to make unique cakes, photograph the event, design a website (new SCOTUS case). This is indentured servitude, not merely equal accommodation at a diner open to the general public. The only winners of the "Civil Rights" regime are the Gewish lawyers to make bank destroying whites and Christians whom they hate in the first place.

@justinedwards5021

2 жыл бұрын

@@nullentry6032 the supreme court also ruled the bakers in Colorado didn't have to bake a cake for a gay couple

@justinedwards5021

2 жыл бұрын

hate to break it to you but there are limits on the first amendment since it only prevents the government from infringing on free speech but not your employer

@nullentry6032

2 жыл бұрын

@@justinedwards5021 The Supreme Court did no such thing. All they did was throw out the action against that baker over the commission's anti-religious bias. They did not strike down the 'forced work' law. The only reason the baker won is because the commission made public statements. So the Indentured Servitude push is still going to force Christians to participate in homosexual events.

@justinedwards5021

2 жыл бұрын

@@nullentry6032 they most cardinally did i suggest you get your facts straight first

Both these ladies are not qualified for the bench. Next

@rustytrombone8011

2 жыл бұрын

proper english would say neither is qualified, but your english is as good as your logic.

@carloshathcock6371

2 жыл бұрын

@@rustytrombone801110th jab is due

@frankelizalde9306

2 жыл бұрын

@@rustytrombone8011 ,Your worthless message FAILS to change fact that those two nominees are self- disqualified for the bench , as they DITHER .

The Fact, no other Race or Sex is being Considered is Illegal, Raciest and Immoral. This Admin is a Disgrace! Let's Go Brandon, FJB!

@karenkatz9923

2 жыл бұрын

Everything they have been doing since Trump was elected has been illegal, it’s sickening!

@jeremyjones381

2 жыл бұрын

What is sicking is that people like you can't see how corrupt trump was.

@map4853

2 жыл бұрын

@@jeremyjones381 name one where he was corrupt?

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

Lol racism doesn’t exist anymore ain’t that what y’all been yelling

@NRALifer1

2 жыл бұрын

@@kylerfranklin6728 No, that's what Y'all have been keeping Alive and Well, Hypocrite.

Great way to set the criteria for a Supreme Court nomination. Black and female. Now I have zero problems with either of those, but that surely limits the people vastly qualified to be nominates.

God Help us ALL … President Potato is destroying every single thing he touches

@larsinteriors9348

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, do what i do, if you know a democrat let them know just how stupid they are.

@frankelizalde9306

2 жыл бұрын

Flopping , one time after another is biden’s expertise. Everything that biden’s handlers TELL biden to do is a guaranteed ACTIVIST’s wreckage to BE.

@richardlandis793

2 жыл бұрын

President Wannabe and Harris do the work of three men. Larry, Moe, and Curly. Let’s Go Brandon.

@cunctator6843

2 жыл бұрын

my god disagrees with you

@presidentpotato222

2 жыл бұрын

@@cunctator6843 good for your God … he wrong but you know ..

The second a Democrat nominates someone is when proof of their incompetency is established.

@cris1596

2 жыл бұрын

Why are you all so narrow-minded? You should be grateful that Trump is no president anymore. With his whining voice, blaming everything to the Democrats, taking credit away from them... All of you, little lap dogs, are followers. That's why you are incapable of seeing what he is all about! How sad! This is why he abuses his power, thinks he is cute, and steals our tax money. So, if he were to tell you to jump from a mountain into a precipice, will you?

I love it when they say “ My personal views would not affect my decision making.” Liberal judges are selected so their personal views will affect their decision making.

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@tarabay9297

2 жыл бұрын

You have to give her credit she does not like to rubbbb her genitals on to other women, get DRUNK then scream I LIKE BEAR. and.....check last 2 justice they did express the same "my personal views.....please do the research before commenting a Blablabla

@demurevilleneuvewinslet8235

2 жыл бұрын

I'm still waiting for the day, for the other side to wise up, and start doing the same. Instead of hiring folks who please Blue States.

@PokeMaster03

2 жыл бұрын

The same goes for conservative judges

@anonnon4737

2 жыл бұрын

Amy Coney Barret refused to answer numerous questions about her personal views and even on established precedent and conservative judges are selected for the same reason.

But here they both are chosen solely on their Race!!!

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

They’re qualified get over it

@susieque176

2 жыл бұрын

@@kylerfranklin6728 You are so correct. Black and Female are the only qualifications!!

These people think that the Constitution grants us these Rights. Wrong, GOD gives us these rights, the Constitution just confirms these rights!

@lukedavis1769

2 жыл бұрын

Amen 🕊️🌎🌍🕊️

@bobbytea8183

2 жыл бұрын

How?

@lukedavis1769

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobbytea8183 They are God given and they are inalienable rights. Read the constitution. Blessings... 🕊️🇺🇸🕊️

@larryrivers2752

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobbytea8183 HE gave you life.

@lukedavis1769

2 жыл бұрын

@@larryrivers2752 Amen 🕊️🌎🌍🕊️

Remember Obiden as a 100 percent long term failure and disaster himself, will only pick disasters for our country.

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

So you dislike the black President the guy that’s white but like blacks and these two black women hmm 🤨 I think we found the only issue you really have 🤷🏿‍♂️

Box tickers, these ladies must feel awful that they get promoted to these positions only on the colour of their skin.

@stevebrownrocks6376

2 жыл бұрын

Nah, they love it.

@NOTHERE2CODDLEU

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I can't agree. If she was she wouldn't have been standing being old fart whitey during the announcement of her nomination.

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

Been happening since the beginning of time but now since it’s black woman you whites have something to say stfu I thght racism doesn’t exist anymore ain’t that what y’all been telling us 🤷🏿‍♂️

It’s a shame that I can’t feel comfortable knowing that these two people are the most qualified candidates America has to offer. I miss the meritocracy. Hiring people based on skin color is the ultimate form of racism.

This Jackson lady has no clue!

@saratoombs6812

2 жыл бұрын

I COULD NOT CALL THESE WOMEN LADIES, LADY WAS JACKIE KENNEDY, MARGARET TACHER, NANCY REAGAN, MELANIA TRUMP, VERY VERY HARD NOW DAYS TO FIND A LADY

Why can't Biden nominate a first Native American or the 1st native Hawaiian? Why does it always have to be a black issue

@adaisrae

2 жыл бұрын

Because it happened during Black History Month😁

We are screwed goodbye America that I used to know

@brieziethirteen13

2 жыл бұрын

Giving up a little too soon, ya Mark? Dont let a few well placed criminals lead you to believe America is gone.There arent as many as they pretend. The loud mouths, multiple fake accounts might make it seem like we are out numbered, but thats not true.Besides, Shit hasnt even gotten real yet. After litigation war, if the justice system is too infilterated, then it goes to the streets. You might want to ditch the defeatest attitude and stock up on the pemmican, salt and antibiotics.. This is far from over.

@allisondrew3119

2 жыл бұрын

Watch out America communist are arriving

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

😂 good it’s finally becoming great

@ericsniper9843

2 жыл бұрын

@@brieziethirteen13 you sound like those southerners in 1860. They took the loss and have been losing every since. I'm afraid the America you once knew is no more. if you believe that anything outside of the ballot box is an option then you are sadly mistaken.

@brieziethirteen13

2 жыл бұрын

@@ericsniper9843 yeah sure I do. Lmao nice try,Little fascist . go change your diapie.

I appreciate that both nominees are at least answering questions and providing examples. Better than most nominees before these committees.

@rhuttrho88

2 жыл бұрын

Nah B!

Since complexion and gender were Jotato’s sole criteria for choosing a nominee, shouldn’t the most heavily complected and/or most feminine candidate have been selected?

I'm sure they are qualified, but this is so wrong. We now put race in front of other deserving nominees. The squad owns him, and this is why the world is crumbling around us.

@NOTHERE2CODDLEU

2 жыл бұрын

I don't know about that, I really don't. What if this is his was of repenting for all the racism he thought throughout the years. If the squad was behind him, why would they be giving a response to the state of the union? Do we now have three parties? The answer might be yes, yes indeed.

@aaronmattox2870

2 жыл бұрын

It should be the most qualified regardless of race.

Recognize who nominated them.

If that’s true why are all democrats against that amendment and you as a judge should make sure that they don’t try to take it away from us!!!!!

Here you go folks. Enemy from within.

I GUESS I CAN SAY I ONLY WANT A WHITE PERSON NOMINATED FOR THE SUPREME COURT. MEXICANS FOR TRUMP 2024.

@americafirst1282

2 жыл бұрын

Dadda you’re a gem 💎 My Patriot friend

@beforeyourimmigrants8471

2 жыл бұрын

Señor, you're still going back. Thank you for supporting Trump and all but your not part of the club unless you're lineage goes back prior to the civil war.

@xIGOTUx1

2 жыл бұрын

@@beforeyourimmigrants8471 SURE IT DOES. TX HOMEBORN ALL AROUND EVEN AS FAR AS CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS APACHE BLOOD MIXED BREED. AMERICAN FATHER AND MEXICAN MOTHER. HOW DO YOU DO SIR.

@beforeyourimmigrants8471

2 жыл бұрын

@@xIGOTUx1 You still don't make the cut. You're going back as soon as we can get Trumps long-term agenda in place. No Asians, Arabs, Mestizo, Spanish, Indians, Africans or Caribbeans.

@xIGOTUx1

2 жыл бұрын

@@beforeyourimmigrants8471 DANG!!!! WHERE CAN I JOIN. AMERICAN STRONG. MEXICANS FOR TRUMP 2024.

She not only represented them, SHE’s ONE OF THEM!

@danielwarner7572

2 жыл бұрын

Oh, and Donald Trump the over throw the government leader isn't one? Give me a fucking break!

@hezmydaddyo2722

2 жыл бұрын

@@danielwarner7572 this particular govt needs to be overthrown. Daffy Duck would do a better job.

@tjwoot1974

2 жыл бұрын

@@danielwarner7572 TDS

"The religious organization can be included". No, "it is included". Not, "can be". That means the nominees are saying "not all the time it is included but can be." Which is bull$h**

One slow thinker (obvious one) and one snappy sharp thinker. Sen Cotton should have switched the direction of the questioning to get better answers

@GokulOnFire

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. The other lady was very smart in answering Cotton's questions than the current SCOTUS nominee. All these noms give lazy answers such as ill follow precedent, it was years ago blah blah answers but she was very methodical.

We have had enough nominees come up to Congress and lie about specific subjects that it's hard for me to believe them. I highly doubt either of these two women would support my second amendment rights or first amendment rights if I used them in ways that are not in line with the left's narrative. Nor do I believe if I was clearly and obviously discriminated against would they rule in my favor.

@lescobrandon8045

2 жыл бұрын

It doesn't really matter does it? The first hint of gun confiscations will spark a revolt against the government, and don't think just Republicans own and are willing to protect that right. Blue Dogs, and libs are so very different. I also have a feeling Blue Dogs will help vote out this administration. I'm republican, but I'm smart enough to know there are decent Democrats, few and far between, but there is.

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂 weak

@demurevilleneuvewinslet8235

2 жыл бұрын

I wonder when will folks wise up, and start doing the same thing the other side has been doing for decades. Put in a litmus test, instead of hiring folks who will please Blue States.

@ericsniper9843

2 жыл бұрын

You do know that there is more to the constitution than the 2nd and 1st amendments? If the Second amendment was repealed today would you feel less safe in America?

@bryanbaumgartner5302

2 жыл бұрын

John Adams defended British soldiers and he became president

Can't that lady answer any questions on her own

Neither are qualified. They both agreed to having personal feelings on the implementation for limitations and restrictions upon the Bill of Rights (the Supreme Law of the People) by the federal and state governments thus deferring to said limitations abd restrictions under previous court opinions which in turn establish precedence. This directly violates the enumeration of rights clauses per Amendment IX and Amendment X. No more judicial nominees, let every life-long appointee die off one by one until this egregious overreach self corrects this sinking liberal ship to Hell.

@frankelizalde9306

2 жыл бұрын

For certain, neither of those nominees expressed prudent DECLARATION ADHERENCE to doctrines specified in the Constitution. Any slithering, other response is self- disqualifying .

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂

Hope there are a lot more questions

Isn't someone on a board of an organization in question and investigation a concern

What about the Constitution?? 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Akiyumi-Jackson was very well spoken, articulate, and very knowledgeable, both of precedence and current affairs involving the court, well done.

Was the terrorist question supposed to expose if they CHOSE to represent them? I guess I'm lost on the reason for that question.

The Supreme court still arguing over if a gun looks modular it most be spitting dragon fire.

Great....and this is what they want on the supreme Court????

Secularism is a religon. The belief in the "absence of religon" is, in and of it's self, a religon. We need start acknowledging this fact. Secularism has just as many politicaly driven moralistic tenets as any other religon.

@marilyncoyne4034

2 жыл бұрын

Yes and Islam is pushing it internally. Wake up.

@dalspartan

2 жыл бұрын

I suppose the Constitution is beyond their scope?

@NOTHERE2CODDLEU

2 жыл бұрын

I thought the same.

Congratulations on being black, therefore a nominee.

@Juandinggong

2 жыл бұрын

Yup , only way to get jobs these day is to have right race and gender now a day.

@rustytrombone8011

2 жыл бұрын

my guess is they could out think you when they were five years old.

@georgehenry76

2 жыл бұрын

@@rustytrombone8011 that has nothing whatsoever to do with my comment. Just a typical leftist insult, due to the fact that you can’t make an argument. You could have just told me that I am not black and therefore not at their level.

@carloshathcock6371

2 жыл бұрын

@@rustytrombone8011 was that supposed to hurt someone's feelings? 🤡

@frankelizalde9306

2 жыл бұрын

@@rustytrombone8011 ,Your “guess” is worthless as your remarks, here and elsewhere. Instead of trying to show off, sit front of mirror and amuse self with your nonsense, jack !

It should have gone this way: "Judge, does the US Constitution allow people to be treated differently because of their race?" No, Senator. "Judge, do you support Affirmative Action?"

@williamnichols199

2 жыл бұрын

Answer: Senator, I do as far as the laws and court rulings allow.

@rangersmith4652

2 жыл бұрын

@@williamnichols199 Follow-up question: "But what if those laws and rulings are clearly a violation of that Constitutional principle?" I realize SCOTUS can only deal with cases that are brought to it. It's time someone brought Affirmative Action laws in areas of life other than college admissions to SCOTUS. The precedent set in Bakke of applying strict scrutiny needs to be re-examined. The idea that a state has a compelling interest in artificially creating a racially diverse student body is nonsense. A state's compelling interest in higher education is that the best and brightest are given top consideration regardless of demographic factors, especially factors made illegal as discriminators in the Consitution.

@ericsniper9843

2 жыл бұрын

@@rangersmith4652 why does affirmative action both you so? Do you actually think Donald Trump was the best qualified candidate to get into Wharton School of Business at the Univ. of Pennsylvania? Would you agree that the white America has benefitted from their color for the bulk of the existence of this country?

@rangersmith4652

2 жыл бұрын

@@ericsniper9843 I have never examined the admission policies of Wharton not Trump's vitae. And I would agree that for a period in American history, being white had advantages. It certainly does not today. America once made the grave error of favoring members of one race over another. We learn from this, fix it, and move on. But how we fix it matters a great deal. Affirmative Action is an attempt to make something fair by giving an advantage once held by one to the other instead. Imagine a race between two horses. They are required to carry the same total weight, and a weigh-is accomplished. The race is run, and Horse A wins. But in the post-race re-weigh, and error is discovered; Horse B was carrying 10 extra pounds. A rematch is scheduled. Should Horse A now carry an extra 10 pounds, or should extra care be taken to ensure both horses carry the same weight? Affirmative Action answers that question by placing an extra 10 pounds on Horse A. Does that seem OK to you?

@ericsniper9843

2 жыл бұрын

@@rangersmith4652 I think there are several factors that schools use to determine exactly who gets to attend a certain school here in America. I like the fact that you did acknowledge whites were given special treatment and this moved into all aspects of our society. When I was a boy I sold the Washington Star newspaper in the early 1970's. There were others who sold newspapers in congressional office buildings. Now when one of those kids would quit the guy on the corner would move up. I was advised when a vacancy was available in the Cannon Office Building that I would not be receiving that assignment because this one white family with several sons would pass it on to the next son. I was shocked and for the first time understood the benefits that whites received in this country. I eventually took over the Hart Senate Building in the fall of 1973. I worked twice as hard and twice as long to receive something a white kid was just given.

If one of these people get appointed I hope they are so proud of getting this job based on race and not on merit. If they are the best for the job we will not know it. Isn't this a form of racism?

@gaylestrope6978

2 жыл бұрын

They won't care about skin color over merit...they probably got into college with affirmative action...

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

Been happening since the beginning of time but now it’s black women everyone is ready to discuss racism I thght it wasn’t around anymore that’s what we been getting told for years

Thank goodness Cotton, Cruz and Hawley are not sitting on the Supreme Court.

Can’t believe that it would come to this

A commitment to justice and fairness is paramount, and as a citizen of the United States of America 🇺🇸 and a Black Man I welcome the two nominations with honor and respect and it's apparent that these two ladies know more about case laws and constitutional law than most care to acknowledge 👍 👏

@imo9868

2 жыл бұрын

They'll probably vote to take away our freedom of speech and our right to bear arms if they get half a chance. They're party line players. And the vile Dems will also try to stack the court. I don't care what race they are, they're Leftists and that's bad for our country and our freedom.

yup they dont want to answer what they "believe"...until they are ON the court...

Well that went well.😦😦😦😂😅😂😅😂😅😂

BIG NO!! SICK AND TIRED OF THIS BULLCRAP

At least they are answering straight and plain

Why are we even at this point? NOONE nominated for a public position only after being qualified as a particular race or sex, is a legitimate nominee! "Don't let the door hit you on the way out"

@NOTHERE2CODDLEU

2 жыл бұрын

Because they couldn't handle the outcome of 2016, that's how we got here.

@kylerfranklin6728

2 жыл бұрын

😂

God forbid she make it.

Dancing around the question!

Very good answers

NO CONFIRMATION!

Are all nominees still sworn in under God? How can they say yes when they are all atheists? Haven't met a religious Democrat in a long.... long time.

@RavenKnighthawk

2 жыл бұрын

From my understanding they can be sworn in on their own religious book. A Jewish candidate would be sworn in on the Tanakh, Christian candidates would be sworn in on the Bible, Muslim candidates would be sworn in on the Quaran, etc. As far as atheists go, I think they should be sworn in on the constitution itself if that would be possible.

Just can’t hear one single answer from this nominee! Gosh, what a troublesome situation we are in....

Even more marxists...

😢🙏🙏

Yes or No questions turn into BLAH,BLAH,BLAH WHICH IS LIE AFTER LIE....SOLID NO ON THESE CHUMPS!

Senator Cotton didn't ask what the supreme court thinks he asked what you think you and your evasiveness spoke volumes for your thoughts on the subject

Anti religion-They both choked. Second amendment-Gagged. Who were the bow tie boys sitting behind them?

What? WHAT? They didn't thank him for every question? WHHAAAAAT?

Mr. Cotton have you ever encourage the insurrection? Cotton: Hmm I'm the one asking questions dam it!

👏👏👏

If they won't answer a question, they are deceptive and should not be considered.

"Nuance" is nice but "direct" and "straight" answers are preferable to the Nuance Dance.

@imo9868

2 жыл бұрын

And what so many of us love about President Trump.

In our legal system even the worst of the worst are instilled a fair trial and representation in court.

And that is why they want these puppets on the Supreme Court

How are they not aware of other judges views on packing the court???? That is a lie.

They both have me a fairly good impression, but knowing that is what good liars excel at, I just have to look at Biden's other nominees to know how he intends for these prospective supreme court justices to perform. I would have to vote no.

Well , they're both unqualified but they're black and female so we're good right ?

@ericsniper9843

2 жыл бұрын

Who in your opinion is more qualified these two women or Amy Coney Barrett?

They both seem intelligent, educated, and rather reasonable here. Very different than some of the earlier nominees - "Thank you for the question, Senator...."

why can't these brilliant people answer a simple question???? sums up the judgement nicely. On to the next candidate(s).

Thank you for your question, Senator. But I'll just circle around the question. Thank you.

Of course they will say whatever right now, soon they are confirmed they will do the same crap they had done before.

What a waste of time! Circus.

She actually answered a question

At least they can answer questions.

Thought it was your qualifications to be nominated for Supreme Court Justice of the United States. Not the color of your skin. I think 99% the words coming out of jobuds mouth are not his somebody is working him in the background