Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k

China's state media has always called it a weapons launch platform, or a bomber. Because it can launch hypersonic anti-ship missiles to strike US warships at a distance of 1500km. Old plane but new usage

@matheuscerqueira7952

Жыл бұрын

That's the H-6N. The K can launch supersonic missiles though

H6K is an air carrier for carrying cruise missiles long sword 100. which is useful for attacking air carriers and military bases within a range approx. 5000km.

@josephguo3429

2 жыл бұрын

@@guongnlm5529 H6K is not a bomber, just a missile carrier, please do not mislead by its initial HONG.

This bomber also has the potential to be converted to an ECM, AWACS and reconnaissance platform.

High tech is generally a force multiplier, but quantity has a quality all its own. Super weapons are a double edged sword...

I think they're a great idea! Cheap, versatile, long range, reliable & as deadly as your best cruise missiles.

@michaelwan4268

4 ай бұрын

The future will be H20, so there will be no primary upgrading plan for H6K anymore.

Sometimes, you don't need to be highly advanced to beat your opponent. Good enough is good enough.

@terazoids2

3 жыл бұрын

Which this plane isn't.

@dyong888

3 жыл бұрын

@@terazoids2 hahah you're an expert.

@terazoids2

3 жыл бұрын

@@dyong888I will not comment on that However, never subestimate your opponents. Yet, be able to see through their bluff and grandeurisation. There lies the ability to discern their real capabilities. Terrible aircraft since its introduction, and still is. Though, coupled with an elastic mind... Read the attack on the USS Nimitz, in Tom Clancy's "Red Storm Rising".

@gibbsm

3 жыл бұрын

B-52's are just as old.

@dyong888

3 жыл бұрын

@@terazoids2 Go ahead and believe your amerikan propaganda. China has capabilities the yankees haven't seen too. Like dirty harry said, "go on. make my day".

Very cool to see an old plane design upgraded and updated.

@CorePathway

2 жыл бұрын

B-52: am I nothing to you?

Perfect for its role. You don't need a Ferrari to do grocery shopping in real life do you

@jonathantarrant2449

3 жыл бұрын

Are you suggesting the USAF, has over complicated things, with their b2 and soon to be b21

@fandangobrandango7864

3 жыл бұрын

@@jonathantarrant2449 the average taxpayer will tell you YES

@lloydmauler

3 жыл бұрын

Why do you think North Korea still buys mig 21s You do not need a Cadillac to get to seoul in 7 minutes.

@tiptoe38

3 жыл бұрын

@@jonathantarrant2449 hell yes

@MY-zj8pb

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonathantarrant2449 yes. That's why the b52 bomber doing the bombing roles. America is known to waste tax payers money and being inefficient

The latest H6-N can carry one air-launched hyper gliding ICBM.

The H6 is a variant of the Tu 16, which premiered in 1952--just like the B-52.

@mikeschlau4501

3 жыл бұрын

@Pangpi Dawang But also significant smaller, so it can not transport as many bombs or cm as the B-52.

@hafangneige322

3 жыл бұрын

and can't cross the Pacific ocean!!

@geoffroberts1126

3 жыл бұрын

@Pangpi Dawang For which they have the B1 and B2... whilst China has... uh, lots of Badgers. Not invincible, nothing is, but not as impressive as the Chinese Military would like you to think.

@bfc666

3 жыл бұрын

@@geoffroberts1126 true, some of Chinese military hardware cannot be considered cutting edge. All those China threat theory circulating among western militaries are only mean to extract more money from taxpayers. Hahaha 😂

@geoffroberts1126

3 жыл бұрын

@@bfc666 Possibly true to some degree. Though China is acting far more aggressively these days. The whole South China Sea thing isn't sitting well with nations in the region whose territory she's literally stealing. They're doing a lot of sabre rattling these days, those I think there's still rather more rattle than sabre.

Interesting , Thanks for sharing

These are really detailed reports nice work

Really interesting video

Simplicity is undervalued. This thing along with the B52s will be workhorses in a real war.

@georgebarnes8163

2 жыл бұрын

Only against those unable to defend themselves, other than that the B52 is a big slow sitting duck and easy prey , they will only ever be used for stand off weapons or attacks on countries with zero air defence, same applies to all the big slow bombers still in use.

@UD2

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgebarnes8163 after standoff weapons have destroyed everyone's advanced defensive networks, taken down satellites, and obliterated the global supply chain required to replace advanced hardware. it'll be up to these things to end a war.

@georgebarnes8163

2 жыл бұрын

@@UD2 You are a bit of a dreamer, the B52s have been nothing but target practice since the Vietnam war, they can destroy nothing bar the use of stand of weapons, the B52 were and are big fat slow targets and easy to put down with 1960s tech.

Lots of info in your video! The Badger lives on.

*The shell of the old guy is old, but the equipment inside has been replaced.*

This is basically still Tu-16 with total improvement.

@donchen4906

2 жыл бұрын

It has total different function than tu16. Tu16 dropped bombs and h6 doesn't

A very efficient and practical design and can be upgraded and upgraded and modified forever. Excellent aerodynamic design and efficient

@RaveSharrma

3 жыл бұрын

A #copied design

@RaveSharrma

3 жыл бұрын

Wait... you're a bot right!

@cck7633

3 жыл бұрын

@@RaveSharrma You are alien?

@cck7633

3 жыл бұрын

@@RaveSharrma Only a very smart people know a good design to improve on and not reinvent a less efficient design

@UD2

3 жыл бұрын

@@RaveSharrma you should sue them for money.

As simply a ballistic and cruise missile platform all it needs to do is get to it's launch point. In fact it's only priority would be getting to it's launch point, they would be virtually disposable. So it looks capable enough to me.

@user-yk9em3je6q

3 жыл бұрын

And some, perhaps many, of those launch points will be within Chinese airspace.

@kevinblackburn3198

Жыл бұрын

Capable enough is a perfectly acceptable strategic doctrine

Interesting video

Nice video thanks for sending ..with clear explaining of its characters and abilities which its production copied in China. After that progressed in new versions ..its first design...produced in Russia..interests video...H-6 k .later H-6 J new strategic bombers

Awesome looking

Denk geldigim ilk videon. Cok basarili olmus. Sana basarilar dilerim..

Good analysis...

In today’s Morten battle field it a really Nice Target !! This is supposed to be a strategic weapon however if it is accompanied by a swarm of drones it could be a Game changer

@bfc666

3 жыл бұрын

If drones have the range to knock her out 😂

@jcgongavoe337

3 жыл бұрын

It's tasks are to launch long range missles in safe distance, so you have to flank it with interceptor/fighters I guess

Could you do a video of the J-20 and FC-31? :)

Excellent analysis

TU-16:This is my illegitimate son

The analysis is fair enough i think

Look I've been shopping at Harbor Freight for a few years now.............I wouldn't be too worried about these bombers and their capabilities.

@cgustafson240

3 жыл бұрын

This is an underrated comment!

@TheGecko213

2 жыл бұрын

Parts are all knock off and spurious 😂

The badger 🦡 is a leap? That's like modernizing a B-29 and calling it a leap.

@rizalardiansyah4486

3 жыл бұрын

Well... You can say the same about B-52...

@user-yt7bz4bx4o

11 ай бұрын

b52

That thing has "target " written all over it !

@xupaolo3820

3 жыл бұрын

yeah， try to immagine 100 H6 autopilote or contralled by J20. As allways， some one think too little and talk too much

@philliplopez8745

3 жыл бұрын

@@xupaolo3820 I know that you Chinese believe that you exist in the middle kingdom , but how many of the little princess flying those things want to go to heaven so soon ?

@xupaolo3820

3 жыл бұрын

@@philliplopez8745 I think you know，maybe you think you know better than anyone else as your TRUMP ， but indeed you know just as “ much” as Trump. By the way， this middle kingdom that you are talking about really scares a lot of yours， while we do not know who u r and what u want... what could you and yours want， a branch of white racists and imperialists？who care about？ Your days will get worse and worse，from now beginning

Cool plane👍

It's main use will always be long range mass deployment of stand off missiles, decoys and now drones against naval flotillas. To overwhelm the defences of an enemy and force them to expend all their antiair munitions. The second wave of bombers launching before air defences can be reloaded, if that is even possible at sea for vertical launch systems. H-6 use as a conventional bomber would be restricted to areas where the CCP have air superiority or better, supremacy.

@Paul-kw1og

Жыл бұрын

The US would need more than one carrier battle group. Maybe three would be a much more overwhelming initiative against an onslaught from the Chinese.Losses on both sides but the US would prevail.

@ex0duzz

11 ай бұрын

Where are these carriers going to be ? Outside first island chain? They will basically be useless from so far away. If they come inside first island chain, they will be overwhelmed by China's superior numbers and China's numerous carrier killer missiles,including shore based ones. Don't even need h6k but of course they will use them too.

profession thanks

The plane is just platform for launching advanced weapons,so China's recent arsenal of very long hypersonic anti ship cruise missiles and super long air to air missiles will make the PLA air force very powerful in Asia.

@Ac22768

2 жыл бұрын

The words “advanced” and “China” do not go together.

@sayitnow7748

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ac22768 Hmmmm...says the crumbling murican 😂😂

This is more wing than plane, looks very much old school 70's Soviet Tech.

@corvanphoenix

3 жыл бұрын

Hehe 50's is when they're really from!

nice plane

Just use drones to scout, and locate carriers or other ships, and provide targeting data for h-6k to shoot its long range anti ship missiles. Sure, the planes can shoot down the drones but I'll just send a Congo line of drones and trade them for a carrier or aegis destroyer. Job accomplished, 70 aircraft, carrier too basically taken out for cost of few drones and missiles. These are more than enough to provide mobile air launch platform for China's big missiles. Ones that normally need truck to move around on and too heavy for normal fighters.

@user-mh4kh4tm9u

2 жыл бұрын

Jilin -1 satellites can live stream what's on the surface of the earth with HD quality.

Like all these bombers its an option for dekivering a nuclear weapon. One in the air may get through when other delivery systems have been compromised.

Will work as decoys ?

question, why can't we lobe missles from a modified boeing 737, why do we have to use this?

Add light missile also

Hey this is how I would Problem Solve.

Belongs to the 1960s when the Beatles reigned supreme.

@shattered115

3 жыл бұрын

The ageless B-52 has origins in the 1950s and many years of service left as a design.

@fv1234

3 жыл бұрын

@@shattered115 The B-52 or the H-6whatever is useless without air supremacy. That is something PRC airforce can never have.

@namulit

3 жыл бұрын

@@fv1234 Didn't the US have air superiority in Vietnam? Vietnam took down a lot of B-52 anyway AFAIR...

@user-xu4oi9lv8n

3 жыл бұрын

*The shell of the old guy is old, but the equipment inside has been replaced.*

@spitfirenutspitfirenut4835

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-xu4oi9lv8n Junk

These barely modern bombers could fly in formation over Manila uncontested.

A pacemaker, artificial hips, and hearing aids don't make a 90 year old man any less than 90 years old.

@testserver2054

3 жыл бұрын

Doesn’t make it any less then 90 years old but still functions the same

@johnyricco1220

3 жыл бұрын

What if the 90 year old has cruise missiles?

@stephenjoe653

3 жыл бұрын

@@testserver2054 You can say a 1950's Toyota better than a 2020 Tesla, but only in your dream.

@testserver2054

3 жыл бұрын

@@stephenjoe653 functions as a car and it gets you places. The u2 spy plane warthog and the b52 all been around 50 years already and they are still great equipment. Their definitely not gonna be better but why would you compare a 90 year old man to a 15 year old?

@terazoids2

3 жыл бұрын

Old age, by itself, does not make a weapon obsolete. Design shortcomings can break even a new one. More so an old one. The H6 is not a strategic bomber, and its ability to put an effective payload on target is questionable, at best. Even tactically. Furthermore, the H6, the J11, and even their newer designs, like the J20, the FC31 and H20, make patently obvious their inability to develop a native aircraft equal or better than those of their adversaries. Same goes for powerplant and sensors, since everything depends on copying an example, and developing a knockoff, with varying degrees of success.

Nothing can beat UFOs…

The H6 might be new but it’s just a Chinese built TU-16 Russian bomber first built in 27 April 1952.

Why do you assume that the H6 bombers would not have a fighter escort and wouldn't be accompanied with additional fighter jets also carrying antiship missiles to keep busy U.S. fighters and saturate ship defenses? What about the future attack drones?

01:02 lower right corner of the screen, Russian letters РД, meaning taxiway. Ha?

H-6N and H-20 are the real deal.

@zoka7108

2 жыл бұрын

@@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt China makes its own helicopters and stealth fighters. Where are you from Abdul? Can your country even produce screws?

time to talk about the H-20 stealth Bomber.

@terazoids2

3 жыл бұрын

What for?

@randomthot125

3 жыл бұрын

Still shrouded in mystery though, not much to talk about.

"Have also badgered" haha

Its a tu 95 bear with jet engines there class like

Probably sea patrol aircraft with anti ship and sub capabilities.

With analog radar

B-52s look more modern!

Could you, please, do a video on Type 054 family of frigates from China? In my opinion, latest H-6 variants combined with Type 054 frigates can be very effective for China to control nearby seas.

@georgebarnes8163

3 жыл бұрын

@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 nonsense the HK has twice the range of the SU30, 6,000 km compared to the SU30 @ 3,000 kM, the HK also has a larger bomb load @ 9,000 Kg compared to the SU30 @ 8,000 Kg

@georgebarnes8163

3 жыл бұрын

@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 LOL, I am happy to educate you, no need to Thank me for correcting you.

@thantzweaung9080

3 жыл бұрын

@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 Ballistic missiles on donkey-drawn carts are still ballistic missiles. Carry missiles, launch missiles, job done. & yes, J-11 & J-16 (Su-30 variants for China) always accompany H-6. No weapon is used by itself.

@terazoids2

3 жыл бұрын

I would like that. Taiwan's and US navies would love that, too.

@terazoids2

3 жыл бұрын

@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 Let them be, my man. Let them think they are really on par with us, or better. They are in for a very rude surprise, if they believe their own lies.

Chinese homemade strategic nuclear bomber develop to Install electronic advance warfare...a guided precision nuclear bomb..

With light missile

भैय्या चाइना का माल है, चले तो चांद तक नहीं तो फिर शाम तक 😂😂😂😂

Besides PLAAF would have their own early warning craft, their escorts and hypersonic drones to spot U.S. ships. They also have land based ballistic antiship missiles. So scores of fighters to keep F-18s busy. Bombers and more fighters to fire more antiship missiles, island based additional fighters AND antiship ballistic missiles would make short work of any carrier strike group with significant loses. Especially if China can deploy future J-35s, 15s, 16s and 20s reliably with hundreds of PL-15s and PL-20s. Plus the PLAN would be there with their own carriers. Currently U.S. would lose 2 carrier strike groups and still win a pyrrhic victory with %50 loss but within 10 years if China could keep up with the U.S. 6th gen fighter and SSN/SSBN program the U.S. would be in a worst position than it already is.

Add turbo

Boooo No one wants to fly glass cockpit give me those dials in my 1950s jet any day.

Nato have no sense naming Russian/Soviet plane.

300 unit need

Chinese aircraft still are a mystery (also the newer ones.) Is the H6 any good, a "poor man's B52", or pure crap? I think no other country had used the original sowjet aircraft for many many years. It would also be an interesting question how good or bad the Chinese stealth fighter J-20 is and how the aircraft that were developed in China from the 90s onwards are in comparison to jets from other countries.

Me gusta mucho más que los feos B1 Lancer y el B1 Lancer ruso TU 160 o Ty 160,el El Cisne blanco. Un saludo. 👋

The Russians make very pretty planes.

@sharkusvelarde

3 жыл бұрын

Because the Chinese cannot

@geoffroberts1126

3 жыл бұрын

Actually they do/did. The Tu-160 'Blackjack' Белый лебедь, or Belyj Lebeď, 'White Swan' is quite a striking looking aircraft.

When you look at the 1960's design features of this "thing", it's obvious that it has a radar cross section signature of a container ship. It will be detected before the landing gear doors are closed. Good luck with that!

@barrybarnes96

3 жыл бұрын

In any peer to peer offensive weapons system conflict between the US Russia and/or China it will escalate within 20 minutes to all sides trading MIRVs. Those guys (what's left of them) can flourish on a diet of turnips in the cold and dark. Fat westerners (what's left of them), ....not so much.

@holyboxer2.072

3 жыл бұрын

B52 also 1960's design and USAF want to use them until 2060s

@tepesvoda464

3 жыл бұрын

@@holyboxer2.072 B52 is a strategic bomber with a range unrefuelled of 10.000 km, with a payload of 30 tons. This thing is merely a tactical platform with very short legs and a small payload . Not counting the notoriously unreliable "made în China " engines.

@holyboxer2.072

3 жыл бұрын

@@tepesvoda464 2000km and 3 tons？ that make nonse，H6K is 6000km + range and 12 tons payload The range and payload of H6 did less than B52, but China does not need to use bombers to bomb a middle east country 8000 kilometers away like the United States. China only wants to conduct defensive operations within 2000 km of its own territory. And H6 fully meets the needs

@Ac22768

2 жыл бұрын

@@holyboxer2.072 LOL

The latest H-6 is called H-6N, N stands for Nuclear. And for sure, its a brand new plane, new engine, new Avionics System, new radar and so on except looks litte bit like Tu-16.

@leipzigrb4910

3 жыл бұрын

and BTW, Taiwan is actually a province of China, KMT in Taiwan is locality separatist power

@geoffroberts1126

3 жыл бұрын

@@leipzigrb4910 Another wumao comrade unmasking. Taiwan wasn't even part of China when the KMT went there, it was ceded to a foreign nation in the late 19th Century. It is not now a province of China. But the CCP would like us all to swallow their propaganda and let them gobble it up like they did to HK. HK was leased, Taiwan is not part of China and probably never will be again. Don't forget to claim your 50c from Grand Dictator Xi.

@leipzigrb4910

2 жыл бұрын

LOL stop showing your brain level, just live your happy life dude, don’t judge if you don’t know the history. Best wishes 🙌🏻

Well. it's lucky that they have ejector seats.

@zoka7108

2 жыл бұрын

They can also have DF-10 and YJ-18. Good for them.

what if the E2 and the 2 hornet got shot down.. the HK wont fly alone unescorted.

@Mx77E

3 жыл бұрын

You are absolutely right, they are protected by a large number of J-20 and J-16 fighter jets, and S-400 land-to-air missiles.

1. It is not because China has bombers that neighboring countries need U.S. military power, but because of the long-term hostile and unfriendly reconnaissance operations of the U.S. military against China, China must maintain a strong force. 2. The so-called sovereignty dispute in the South China Sea was not a problem until oil was discovered there in 1980. It has always been China’s territory. International law of the sea is not the legal basis for resolving historical territorial waters. Many countries made sovereign declarations when signing this treaty. , China is the same, and the United States has never joined this treaty. 3. Taiwan is a Chinese territory, no matter what he claims to be the Republic of China or whatever, he is just a province in a civil war and rebellion, and foreign countries have no right to interfere. When the United Nations was first established, it also tried to use force to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. It was not until they encountered the Chinese army on the Korean peninsula that the United Nations changed its behavior.

It is never flown above India

heh... performance similar to H-6K (which itself is a Tu-16). well, hopefully, noone will see them in any war.

Soviet Tupolev Tu-16

Yeah it's 60 year old Russian badger

@MY-zj8pb

3 жыл бұрын

Design yes. Material, avionics, engines and weapons are new. Its lighter than the original

H20何时下水？

Looks like food to me.

@xupaolo3820

3 жыл бұрын

yeah ， take all those BB

# Men in Black SAID DON'T REPORT THIS.

Can't say but having Bombers past its age and relevance servs no purpose in current times when worlds moving fast in military technology and China themselves have moved to Mars

Самолёт просто красавец. От русского ту -16 остался фезюляж, там где у тушки находился штурман видимо находится радар в зади под килем нет кабины и пушки тоже нет, двигатели размером больше русского.

Is it still called H-6x? Chinese does things her own way. This H-6 is completely different from that H-6.

Nowadays, it's all about the weapon systems. Weapon carriers don't matter much.

@terazoids2

3 жыл бұрын

Weapon carriers are part of weapon systems.

@Hellohallo

3 жыл бұрын

@@terazoids2 nah, tohse old bombers can carry ai cruise missile close enough to enemy borders/ships to be in 500 kilometer range. they dont need to be advanced at all.

Soviet TU-16

Ready to go and this is what deterred America

@yellowbhee7850

3 жыл бұрын

bisayang manok , Yap that all they can do ..... be a nuisance nothing more ....By the way you should be thankful for China’s Hybrid Rice produced in the Philippines

@yellowbhee7850

3 жыл бұрын

bisayang manok , Shitty gratitude....are you jealous ?

@yellowbhee7850

3 жыл бұрын

bisayang manok , Not interested in your opinion I need my space ....build your own

SU - 25 FROGFOOT'S ELDER COUSIN

Chinese is running out of alphabet to name the aircraft's models

@sjhassjh3941

3 жыл бұрын

china have their own names in chinese,these h ,y, j stuff is for foreigners.

We will see ,H6 series can service another 60 years😂😂😂😂😂😂

Its mainly used for mass missile launches at US carrier groups. Makes sense since the US is there main threat.

I saw these on the clearance shelves at my local Walmart.

@MrTnylam

3 жыл бұрын

FarFrom Home Sorry to hear you so poor you have to shop at Walmart.

@farfromhome6234

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrTnylam Awww...did I hurt your itty bitty patriotic feelings commie? Don’t worry you’ll find a girlfriend soon-or boyfriend.

@MrTnylam

3 жыл бұрын

@@farfromhome6234 Haha...I'm not the one shopping at dollars stores fool.

@farfromhome6234

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrTnylam you again tinker bell? Still aching for a boyfriend....all this for a plastic plane....petty little boy tinker bell.

@psl7360

3 жыл бұрын

They are copying a bit from USAF. When you are stronger you don't care attitude.

Strategic bomber become a niche thing now days, only US and China are still developing new next gen strategic bomber. It's a cheaper way of launching air to surface missile and bombs, it only works when you control the air space or beating some back water 3rd world country.

来了来了

I just cannot see the use for these monsters anymore as they are huge targets in the sky! A modern rocket would take them down fast!!

@christopherneufelt8971

3 жыл бұрын

The effective application of these aircraft are about 800-1000km away from the target. Besides that, some low altitude missiles will first take away the radars, and then these aircraft will be deployed. P.S. A nice chapter on How to make war (Dunnigan), section air warfare- describes the whole deployment paradigm.

@lktan224

9 ай бұрын

So is the American B52.

@harryviking6347

9 ай бұрын

@@lktan224 Lol! Definitely out of date!!

Small eggs....no punch

留给H6的字母不多了

AC/DC's shot down in flames comes to mind...