What's Your Opinion : "France Successfully Tests Launch of Upgraded ASMPA-R" ? ＬＩＫＥ | ＣＯＭＭＥＮＴ | ＳＨＡＲＥ | ＳＵＢＳＣＲＩＢＥ

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

Brahmos laughing on such inferior missiles😜

@rajeshyeole581

28 күн бұрын

France should also integrate laser pods and hypersonic missiles in Rafale jets.

@AnirbanSarkar203

28 күн бұрын

​@@SomeGuy-yb3slBrahMos has 2 major downsides - size & cost

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

​@@AnirbanSarkar203brahmos is more affordable and for weight we have Brahmos-NG😁

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

@@SomeGuy-yb3sl Is it when is it available?

The reason why EJ 200 wasn't chosen was because it is made by a consortium of aero-engine manufacturers. This makes licensing very difficult because you have to sign agreements with several companies, and not being able to sign with any one member of the EJ 200 will scupper the agreement.

@iimcrandomgamer711

28 күн бұрын

​@@Vartik-tq1du So they also give us license productioning.

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

@@iimcrandomgamer711 There was no license production at that time. Plan is to buy engines directly. GE was chosen ahead of EJ jet because of future proofing. We also wanted more powerful engine which RR lacked whereas GE has engines with higher thrust.

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

@@vaimurthy aww coping hard today? The original tender had clause of 50% TOT to which both agreed. EJ engine was selected as it was far superior but GE got the deal due to low bid😁

It will be foolish to believe what Srilankan Foreign M. Says

France should also integrate laser pods and hypersonic missiles in Rafale jets.

@jeanvaljean9293

28 күн бұрын

Dircm are already in the wish list of the f5 standard. Offensive laser requires way to much power. Hypersonic weapons are not magic, just like stealth, whats the volume, the weight, the flight profile, the sensor capacity at those speed, can you maintain communication with the plasma being created, are you low enough to actually surprise the enemy or are you so high that you give away your position earlier then a subsonic missile. Are trading speed for range, what is the drag of low level atmosphere on your missile at such speed. France was the first to demonstrate air breathing engine hypersonic engines in 1962. They know the issues very well and are not compromising or taking shortcuts like the chinese and even the russians.

Bharat Mata ki Jai Jai Hind 🇮🇳

What about Saras. NAL always slips through unnoticed between Tejas and Ghatak news. Have people forgot about civil aviation sector that is extremely important, where we lag behind. We need an indigenous civil aviation sector to achive our extremely ambitious goals that are crucial, before 2030.

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

Nope, we dont need to re-invent everything.

Yes very good news about India 🇮🇳 😊

Jai Hind Vande Mataram 🧡 🤍 💚

Jai bharat

Informative video

Akhand Bharat Zindabad ❤

Let's leave the news about TEDBF and AMCA for our children to follow.

Nice video

India should collaborate fast with France or uk to develop its own jet engines for AMCA and Tejas 2 or IAF will be controlled by USA..

@KuchBhi-xs5oe

28 күн бұрын

There is very anti India sentiment among UK leftists for some weird reason so yeah UK is not that trustable France is best option

WOW NICE 🙏

Jai Hind Jai Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳👍👍

It's a shame that we can't develop our own jet engine 😔

@mukeshrawat9882

28 күн бұрын

😊no need to be shame kiyon ki abhi hame engin ki utni jarurat nahi hai abhi Tejas light vargen hai jiske ladai main utarne ki umeed kam hi hai ye internal diffrance ka role accha nibha sakta hai aur Tejas mk 2 abhi kam se kam 10 saal ki deri par hai tab tak jarurat hai engine manufacturing eco system banane ki jisase agar kal assambali line badi karni pade to sochne ki jarurt na pade

No country will give India TOT of engine technology. India got to develop this technology in-house.

Nice🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

Lol! Who is that person who thinks tanks, aircraft carriers and helicopters won't dominate future warfare? Before the Ukraine war a lot of military analysts had said that heavy artillery is a thing of the past but the war has proven all such claims wrong. Aircraft carriers, tanks and helicopters will always be useful as long as the military knows how to best utilize their assets.

@vivekchaubey8547

28 күн бұрын

Shut your shit mouth u idot

First one to watch the video 😊😊😊😊😊😊

As both TEDBF and AMCA electronic suite development reaches maturity, frequency of increasingly elaborate attempts at espionage and sabotage should increase markedly as well.

"R-37M" 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

First today

Tejas Mk2 ki export chodho bhai.. pehle apna to bana lo.. jabtak ye 414 lag ke udega na ..2030 tak.. tabtak engine bhi apna banjayega .. thodi speed se karna chahiye kaam hume

TEDBF should have access to AMCAs development budget.

First time early view

If mmrfa tender leads we need 40% more thrust engines for Indian flight conditions😮

The problem ADA was not choosing an engine only for the aircraft but a tach. for future development of own engine, exports right, IPR etc. So cost should not have been considered a biggger factor when they were trying to hit too many birds with one shot. Strategic requirements and future should have been considered first priority. I guess the priorities are misplaced and thats why we see such flip flops even after so lengthy negotiations. All the parameters for selection as such should have been made clear to all the participants beforehand.

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Hi

Srilanka Batting

I wanna talk about C-130 in this video.

We should make use of ISRO to develop indigenous jet engines first or try to make jet engines by joint venture with french's safran company..It hurts to see that we can build rockets but we cannot make indigenous jet engine.

Rafale is good but indias AMCA would be much better as it would be stealthier also with nuclear capabilities. When rafale will be inducted is a question mark. Better hope to our AMCA mk1a mk2 and other aircrafts. Rafale has huge orders. Don't rely on it for so long time.

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

We dont know yet. Comparing Rafale with a jet which is on paper is not correct

@ajaybhaskar5052

27 күн бұрын

Anything imported should be less in numbers with tot and local production. If in large numbers HAL is there. Now anything is possible for local industry to make any aircraft with any configurations. Let's hope after mk1a mk2 should be stealthier and have some characteristics of 5th generation.

EJ-200 thrust = 90 kN GE-F414 thrust = 98 kN GE engines, on paper at least, can deliver a higher maximum thrust. The existing GE-404 engines have also proven extremely reliable.

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

On top of that GE has engines with higher thrust for AMCA is available. RR dont have one.

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

@@vaimurthy what engine GE has?😂 GE has told that f414 will be uprated to 116kn. By that logic EJ200 has 120kn variant also. And is a modern engine unlike obsolete f414

Any meaningful update?

EJ200 is rights are co-owned by Germany, UK and multiple other countries... getting permission to export EJ-200 would have been even harder...

@techeves6024

28 күн бұрын

Better than US engine

@cgtim3230

28 күн бұрын

@@techeves6024 Not really... Multiple countries means we have go to multiple governments and ask for their permission... Germany for example much stricter norms than US.

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

@@techeves6024 Nope, US is master in jet engine tech, though RR is better than Saffron. I am not sure whether EJ engine is co-owned, i think it is RR owned only

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

@@vaimurthy master in engine tech that USA still imports rocket engines for NASA from russia😂 RR has zero independent engine for 60 years🤣

@KuchBhi-xs5oe

28 күн бұрын

​@@SomeGuy-yb3slDon't know why soo anti USA views you have USA is pretty much master in all sectors except very few and fighter jet engine is one of them

1:15 I am 100% sure that some of these shells will end-up in Ukraine.

Which one is more maneuverable - R37M or Astra MK3 ?

@yixinmei5854

28 күн бұрын

Astra.

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

Astra MK3 is yet to be available, so we cannot compare

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

@@Vartik-tq1du Comparing specs is child job. No use. let it be available and then we can see

MIL should make sure that the shells exported to Czech Rp will not end up in Ukranian hands.

@suryanshsagar2677

28 күн бұрын

That's not our concern. We're doing business. Russia also sold some helicopters to pakistan and s400 to the Chinese

Navy should take amca naval varient for their carrier operation. I don't see tedbf a good choice. China will use their 5th gen jet against us. So amca is the perfect option with ghatak naval varient for ground attacks.

I just realised what are your sources

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

We all know since ages. Lol

@sinchan060

28 күн бұрын

@@SomeGuy-yb3sl sorry for being late lol

First view

F414 can make Tejas wing less anytime.

How TEDBF can be a fifth gen fighter it has canads

❤

We should also fit 300 kms 6 macs R-37 missile in SU-30 buying from Russia under make in India

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

Are they offering?

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

@@vaimurthy why care? Because according to you r37 and astra mk3 is not real😂😂😂

Dornier aircraft needs massive upgrading😮

Dump F414. But EJ engines are from a consortium. Why not SNECMA M88 ?

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

M88 is 75kn. We want 95kn engine for tejas. We can ask france for m53(mirage jet) engine which they have phased out now. It is 95kn and far better than this american engine. Plus no drama that comes with American equipment

@techeves6024

28 күн бұрын

​@@SomeGuy-yb3slagain it was ada decided stuff and hal agreed

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

Nope, it does not have required thrust and Saffron lacks RR and GE in engine tech

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

@@vaimurthy which jet engine RR has?🤣

@KuchBhi-xs5oe

28 күн бұрын

​@@vaimurthyRR mostly collaborate with USA for engine they are master in warships and aircraft carrier engine

Better not to rely on USA's defence weapons. India has to manufacture their own Engines for fighter jets.

It's always better skip US and purchase from other countries. Previous GE was ready to offer the IP rights of the engine and also co-develop new engine to power AMCA. Now we need US permission to export. Better to go with Rolls Royce, , safran or EW engines.

Now we have beg for the Mercy of America to export our own Fighter jets....wooow ..💪💪💪💪

@abymathew295

28 күн бұрын

@@Vartik-tq1du . If they truly said that, I'm gonna believe them this time...🤣🤣

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

This is last import from USA😃

@abymathew295

28 күн бұрын

@@SomeGuy-yb3sl . We are also importing 5 Billion worth of Drones...🤕🤕🤕🥴🥴

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

@@abymathew295 yes all are last imports now

@Wild-Weasel

28 күн бұрын

Apparently HAL doesn't think it needs America mercy with Tejas exports expected for Malaysia + Argentina + Egypt + Philippines + Ethiopia +....we'll know next week.....

Then we should go with EJ200 engine🙏

By the time the AMCA 5th generation platform comes into service it will be outdated. Should we not prepare a' 7th' generation platform instead? How is Sri Lanka going to achieve "wont allow anyone to Harm India's Security"?

@iimcrandomgamer711

28 күн бұрын

Oh, Yhe 4th gen going to be still viable till 2050 and, you are saying 5th gen or 5.5 gen going to be outdated in single decade. Even after updation of current technologies continuously with time.

@KuchBhi-xs5oe

28 күн бұрын

Looking at global military industry 4th gen will continue till 2040 conservatively as USA NGAD will come after mid 2030s Russia's MiG-41 and France's FCAS and UK's Tempest won't come till 2040 and China and Japan are also developing 6th gen which will come after 2040s India should work on it by 2030s be in race so 4th gen won't be obsolete

Jai Hind Jai Modiji ⚘️ 🙏

If russia has integrated R37-M on su30, india should get it till astra mk3 arrives. 300km is enough to outclass pakistan 145km PL15-E and china 300km PL15.

Instead of wasting time and money on ted bf and amca india should focus on making own jet engine and upgrade tejas aircraft

@aashudhankhar1074

28 күн бұрын

These are two different things.. if u have brain … they run parallel … if engine develop after 10 year so india stop developing amca and tedbf… idiot after 10 year they install new engine in place of old one ..

3rd, 4th, 5th generation....blah blah blah. It still adds up to fantastic pea.

US is not supplying with F414 engines neither mq 9 drones for India still falls in Russian groups. Our leadership at centre never ever got trusted relationship with US.

EJ200 engine have better than ge 414.u.s.have not belivable to any defence deal with india.india should 'tgo to u.s. engine.but we almost can believe in french engine.

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

But our forces wanted top tech. They want US equipment. That means something.

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

@@vaimurthy that's why pur forces selected EJ200 engine😂

IAF should also try to integrate R-37M air to air long range missile on Su-30MKI which has proven its exceptional capabilities in russian ukraine war equipped on Mig-31.R-37M will give IAF the fighting punch against PL-15,PL-17 till Astra mk3 gets commissioned in service.

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

Su57 use it mostly. Mig 31 is mostly used for ground roles.

@dev.sh.

28 күн бұрын

@@SomeGuy-yb3sl Su-57 has not been used much in combat.Mig-31 along with ground attack role is also meant for interception and the majority of mig-29 kills is done by Mig-31 with radar guidance from AWACS.

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

@@dev.sh. su57 are often seen in Ukraine now. Ukraine itself tell how su57 is conducting air strikes regularly. The biggest thermal plant of ukraine was also obliterated by su57 recently.

@Wild-Weasel

28 күн бұрын

Don't expect IAF to be rushing to integrate R37M on Su30MKI with same BARS PESA radar as Su30SM with 150km detection range for 3sqm RCS that dramatically drops for Target tracking required to mid course guide any RF seeking missile to Target...

@Wild-Weasel

28 күн бұрын

According to a study by the Royal United Services Institute, the longest-range recorded kill by a Russian R-37 missile was at 177 km, not 217 km as was claimed by propagandists. In addition, the Russians used Su-35 aircraft, not Su-57, for that Jun 22, 2023.

Who rejected EJ200 in the first place. Babus and PSUs. It was the PSUs that wanted American engines. Not the other way around.

@SomeGuy-yb3sl

28 күн бұрын

They choose EJ200 as it was found superior. For saving money HAL choose this inferior american engine. HAL is at fault.

@srikanth85in

28 күн бұрын

@@SomeGuy-yb3sl Inferior or superior is subjective. EJ200 is highly reliable though. Whereas GE404 has economies of scale and good enough reliability..

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

Simple, for single engine Tejas we needed higher thrust and GE engine have higher thrust compared to EJ. Second is future proofing. We also need engine for 5th gen AMCA. GE has engines whereas RR dont have one. Also GE engines are highly reliable like EJ if not better.

@vaimurthy

28 күн бұрын

@@Vartik-tq1du There are lot of selection in the steps, final selection is what matter.

TEDBF - the most useless project ever. Neither ADA nor Navy has been able to explain why no Naval AMCA has been tried, and why a 4.5 gen fighter is being developed to enter service in the 2030s...

@jonswap9097

28 күн бұрын

Ask the Indian Navy and the government rubber stamp babus that. There are reasons why stealth aircraft were deployed late in the US Navy - could be damage to stealth coatings by sea spray, or the difficulty of concealing ship mounted radars at sea due the how easily surface ships are detected or the lower risk of air combat at sea for ships located a long way out at sea compared with air force planes etc. However there is no reason I can see why a largely common airframe and systems to the AMCA should not be used for the TEDBF instead of the completely different TEDBF design that has been proposed. It seems that the TEDBF team is just doing their own thing just to create their own fiefdom.

@mayurbhayani4039

28 күн бұрын

There was a report from ADA that Naval Amca would have been a bit more expensive to maintain on aircraft carrier.(That's all we got, Right or wrong you decide)

@Kalyan-reddy

28 күн бұрын

More like orxa.and tedbf should be selected if indegenious engine is ready and amca mk1 and 2

@gauravtripathi2643

27 күн бұрын

@@jonswap9097 you answered the very relevant point you raised yourself. Though the F35 does serve aboard carriers, even if it lands vertically which may reduce damage. Fact is, commonality of design, and economies of scale should have scored over, especially as the TEDBF is NOT a stealth platform. Instead we have twisted arguments like "to make TDBF viable, IAF, by far the larger consumer, should order ORCA"!

@gauravtripathi2643

27 күн бұрын

@@jonswap9097 u nailed it with 'fiefdom'. Quite agree