Gene Hackman's best performance in many years.

@reiland3871

Жыл бұрын

Nice one :)

@krzysztofborkowski9677

Жыл бұрын

Yep

@pandaboy9517

Жыл бұрын

'dont get me mixed up with a whole different body'

@golgotha3938

Жыл бұрын

Loved him in enemy of the state.

@Andygb78

Жыл бұрын

The Conversation.

Don't interrupt the guest if they are still making their point

@irasmith3832

Жыл бұрын

I can't stand the interrupting either. It is rude and steps on what the expert has to say.

@fernandough2117

Жыл бұрын

This person was the worst

@biddyboy1570

Жыл бұрын

Yep

@joshuarosenblatt

Жыл бұрын

100%.

@janvandermeer6159

Жыл бұрын

Silly woman shut up for once.

These Times Radio interviews are better than 99% of what we get in US media.

@paulm7666

Жыл бұрын

Listen to the Telegraph podcast about Ukraine. Top notch.

@StillAliveAndKicking_

Жыл бұрын

It’s a top radio station.

@888Longball

Жыл бұрын

So true. I'm from Canada but trust World news to Times. Everything on the news here is politicized and subjective. Objective journalism is dead in North America.

@TDurden527

Жыл бұрын

I agree. US media is all about getting attention to boost the viewership so boost advertising revenue, inho.

@dogpaw775

Жыл бұрын

remember to keep your own counsel there friend.

she needs to stop interrupting him.

@lacosa24x

Жыл бұрын

I know 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

@davidmckendry7684

Жыл бұрын

So it's her show.... He is the guest. She gets to ask questions. She even invites him to answer the question he poses st the end!

NATO air force planes will be added to the equation. If Russia thinks they have issues now, they haven't seen anything yet.

@terrencekane8203

Жыл бұрын

Amen💙💛

@Mr.Monta77

Жыл бұрын

NATO will have air superiority withing hours.

@krakhedd

Жыл бұрын

I don't have a source but I heard early on (post-Feb 24) that inside the Kremlin, they think NATO would win a conventional war in 15 minutes. The only way that happens is we use airplanes and take Poohtin and the general out with a multi-point, coordinated attack

@robertwilson214

Жыл бұрын

You'll be vaporised out your armchair,general.

@user-wm4lm1jq5u

Жыл бұрын

Слава Украине love from Lebanon 🇱🇧 ❤️ to 🇺🇦 💙💛

Spot on, General!

@dailylaughdose7030

Жыл бұрын

I don't know what type of drugs this gentleman took but anyone knows if US even sent long range missile will cease to exist 😂

@williamyoung9401

Жыл бұрын

"Today, every inhabitant of this planet must contemplate the day when this planet may no longer be habitable. Every man, woman, and child, lives under a nuclear sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment, by accident, or miscalculation, or by madness. The weapons of war must be abolished, before they abolish us." -President John F. Kennedy.

I always appreciate General Breedlove’s analysis, he’s one of the great ones.

@18_rabbit

Жыл бұрын

@JD Rhea good sign when a critic/troll has no critique at all, no content...hmmm. I guess the paper tiger really is dead.

@TheHerrUlf

Жыл бұрын

He's even better than that: he actually breeds love. A rare thing

@dailylaughdose7030

Жыл бұрын

I don't know what type of drugs he this gentleman took but anyone knows if US even sent long range missile will cease to exist 😂

@dailylaughdose7030

Жыл бұрын

@@18_rabbit @Little Tazz The 9M730 Burevestnik is a Russian experimental nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed cruise missile under development for the Russian Armed Forces. The missile has an essentially unlimited range. No wonder Biden is getting Armageddon hallucination 👀

@psotos

Жыл бұрын

@@dailylaughdose7030 No Russia would cease to exist. In fact, its on borrowed time already. I predict that it will collapse in less than 6 months. I will celebrate when it does.

A very shrewd,level headed and knowledgeable interview from General Breedlove!

I like him. Sober. Pragmatic. Grounded. I think he's talking sense. I think he is the kind of man we should be listening to.

@Renzsu

Жыл бұрын

And not one to fall into a trap of making needlessly controversial statements.

@MrJudge51

Жыл бұрын

Its a four star General. They do not talk nonsens.

@robertwilson214

Жыл бұрын

Create a coup.Provoke,then act innocent.....now back to sleep.

@jz12390

Жыл бұрын

Hes nuts..

@Gizziiusa

Жыл бұрын

Sober ?! Well, I sure hope he's sober. No need listening to an intoxicated general talking nonsense...

so annoying when hosts interrupt

Sounds like a really well balanced man.

@dailylaughdose7030

Жыл бұрын

I don't know what type of drugs this gentleman took but anyone knows if US even sent long range missile will cease to exist 😂

@dailylaughdose7030

Жыл бұрын

@Little Tazz The 9M730 Burevestnik is a Russian experimental nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed cruise missile under development for the Russian Armed Forces. The missile has an essentially unlimited range. No wonder Biden is getting Armageddon hallucination 👀

@williamyoung9401

Жыл бұрын

"Coalition of the Willing..." I remember that being said during the Iraq War, 2003...

Thank you. A breath of fresh air, dignity and reason.

@dailylaughdose7030

Жыл бұрын

I don't know what type of drugs this gentleman took but anyone knows if US even sent long range missile will cease to exist 😂

My bet is immediate NATO massive airstrikes both on land and at sea to a scale not seen since the 1991 Gulf War.

@willmac5642

Жыл бұрын

They'd target the launch sites for sure. I'd leave London if this happened!

@rainertrier4987

Жыл бұрын

@@willmac5642 London? Berlin.

@cooldudecs

Жыл бұрын

@@willmac5642 they would destroy all Russian nuclear sites

@jz12390

Жыл бұрын

@@cooldudecs Those missiles would be inbound to the USA by the time US cruise missiles reach Russian nuclear sites..

@robertrumgay5286

Жыл бұрын

Putin will lose stalingrad and the russians will do him in (kind terms) just speculation scary i hope none of that happens

Bolton should always be taken in the context of an unstable man who once chased a colleague through the halls with a pair of scissors. The good General knows this. 😂

@CollectiveWesterner

Жыл бұрын

Wow....that sounds more like a General Disarray

@thetruthnothingelse5033

Жыл бұрын

Or Russian troll

@thelmaviaduct

Жыл бұрын

Bolton is a bollockless coward.

@RobBCactive

Жыл бұрын

Bolton was out of his depth, misrepresented the US position, failed to explain his case.

@bg1616

Жыл бұрын

Did Putin really do that? Well it's not a surprise

The reason the US no longer insists on replying with nuke vs nuke is that we no longer need a nuke to have a nuke level of impact with escalation...

@No1sonuk

Жыл бұрын

@k 1 That's why he said the first retaliation to a tactical nuke would be conventional, but if Putin went on, the same couldn't be said for the second retaliation.

This guy is impressive

@SparkyWaxAll

Жыл бұрын

I love how the General went full civilian after retirement. 👍

@chrissniper3761

Жыл бұрын

About as impressive as the Afghanistan botched pullout war profiteer

Brilliant analysis. Reasoned and thoughtful.

You can tell that this guy is a poker player. Keeps his cards very close and doesn't give away anything.

@tonyqwabe5873

Жыл бұрын

Perfect description....he is poker faced

It's good to know that there are senior military generals currently serving, that will have the same cool, calm and collected attitude that this retired general has. You can be assured, regardless of all the current fervour from the media and social media, that these military people have everything well in hand.

When he said there were conventional options more destructive than tactical nukes, it's kind of like during WW2 where the fire bombing attacks on Tokyo and other cities, Dresden too, were just as destructive as the atomic bombs.

@mickelodiansurname9578

Жыл бұрын

They can scratch the whole Kerch bridge attack off the retaliation list... that ship has sailed... and caught fire, and sunk!

Nice calm answers by this gentleman. And the questions he asked himself when he didn't like the interviewers were just as good... 😂

The General has to ask and reply as the interviewer can’t do her job. This General is the cherry on top of the cake when relates to war analysis. Very intelligent, weighted restrained with wording a true legend.

damn, you can feel the brilliance.

Thank you General Louis CK.

General Breedlove has very similar face, smile and determination as my father, he always reminds me of him.

Some kind of kinetic activity. What a mild descriptor for a powerful response.

One option is deny Russia any use of the sea for anything include commercial. We largely look away as commercial ships transport oil to India and China, in fact we largely protect the sea for "everyone" to use for trade. I think Russia would be denied that. ... No more commercial shipping for anything. Also, I don't think anyone except maybe North Korea would want to trade with a Russia that has used nuclear weapons against Ukraine. If China or India for some reason continued, I think all the other countries of the world could easily be convinced to join secondary sanctions of any country trading anything with Russia.

@wombatwilly1002

Жыл бұрын

Interesting concept that has merit.

@VoiceBootcampInc

Жыл бұрын

Hit russian install all over the world from Africa to Asia. Everywhere except Russia mainland.

@PD-yd3fr

Жыл бұрын

25% tariff on goods to or from any nation trading with Russia, possibly limiting all visas from citizens of those countries as well

@TDurden527

Жыл бұрын

I hope so.

@DAndyLord

Жыл бұрын

@@johanlofgren7081 Also no more overland or sea shipments to Kaliningrad. Literally zero supplies. Cut all the power lines, any water or gas service that crosses Poland or Lithuania. Cut the subsea or overland internet connection. Then 100% total blockade.

Russian bots not enjoying this 😆😆😆😆

@robertsmith5744

Жыл бұрын

They are busy learning to speak Chinese.

@TDurden527

Жыл бұрын

@@robertsmith5744 Good one Robert!

@douglastaggart9360

Жыл бұрын

Explain what a Russian bot is?

@Brian-om2hh

Жыл бұрын

@@robertsmith5744 Or polishing up their rusty AK47's......

@Brian-om2hh

Жыл бұрын

@@douglastaggart9360 A supporter of the Kremlin who spouts bullsh*t Douglas........

Thank you General for your very wize words. I believe you're absolutely right. 💯

Now we understand at last why "Mutually Assured Destruction" is so flawed: It relies on *all* parties being sane. As soon as one breaks and falls into insanity, the world is destroyed.

@goodgame3374

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. We've recently seen what happens when a leader with a fragile ego loses power, and they don't care about the damage they cause to avoid being seen as a "loser". It's worth studying trump to get a feel for how putin might respond.

@russ_6214

Жыл бұрын

Indeed. The idea that the west should get involved in a regional conflict in support of a non-NATO hopelessly corrupt country like Ukraine to whom we owe no defense treaties and strike Russia when it has not threatened or acted against NATO in any way shape or form, which will almost certainly escalate to an understandable nuclear response by Russia against NATO, truly is insane.

@jamesgavin6171

Жыл бұрын

No it only requires one. If Russia goes insane and will stop at nothing to get what they want than NATO has humanity in their hands and there duty is to be sane, rational with a cool head to not escalate things to the point of dooming us all.

@danielslocum7169

Жыл бұрын

you make a very good point.

@grandecache4361

Жыл бұрын

@@goodgame3374 perhaps you can leave Trump out of this okay there democrat.

🙏 thank you General , pity re the interview

Thank you, General, for all of your insightful commentary. In America, we appreciate your clarity on these matters and salute you for your service.

@boweevil6442

Жыл бұрын

Colonels MacGregor Bacevich would disagree .

Very informative Video. Thank you so much for your service, and let's hope that nukes are not a part of the equation now and forever.

@a64738

Жыл бұрын

Sadly it is very much a part of the equation since Putin keep threatening to use them if Russian soil is attacked... And now Russia consider the occupied parts of Ukraine as Russian soil and they can now use nukes saying Russia was attacked when Ukraine try to take back their land.

This guy knows his s#@t 🙏🏻

Breedloves calm and sensible response is great 👍

who thinks a conventional retaliation would not trigger an escalation.

@bixbysnyder-00

Жыл бұрын

It very well could, but lets remember it is Russia that has gotten us here. Also if Russia isnt already a global pariah, it will be after any nuclear attack. If Russia responds with nukes to a conventional strike, then Moscow will be a radioactive crater, and most of us will be dead.

@fronabulax63

Жыл бұрын

@@bixbysnyder-00 so if we all die, at least its russia fault:-))

@StillAliveAndKicking_

Жыл бұрын

No retaliation is the same as surrendering, then that gives the green light to any dictator to use nuclear threats to get whatever they want.

@kkpenney444

Жыл бұрын

it would be suicide.

@MrJudge51

Жыл бұрын

The escalation allready happend.

I'll take a break from this war and nuclear chatter by relaxing tonight with a good movie, Dr. Strangelove.

@Mainyehc

Жыл бұрын

… or Wargames 😂

@theshahofiran902

Жыл бұрын

That’s litteraly what i did today 🤣🤣 the ending scene kind of gave me an existential crisis

@bencousins7311

Жыл бұрын

there's no fighting in the war room!

He said as a military commander he would not be speaking publicly about taking Putin out , this on the other hand means they are talking about it in private briefings

@RonJohn63

Жыл бұрын

And, of course, Bolton is *not* military. (He's always been the slightly crazy diplomat powerful countries need.)

You guys always great content

4:35 wow , that’s a wild question to ask out of left field 😂😂

Putin will be around for Christmas but not for New Year 🤣🤣🤣

@TDurden527

Жыл бұрын

Good one Ricardo!

@nigelsmith2044

Жыл бұрын

Nukes will be used...

@snello8798

Жыл бұрын

Let’s hope you right man 👍

@viperguyz

Жыл бұрын

Keep dreaming! Putin will be in New York to watch the ball drop and drink into the morning.

@righthandstep5

Жыл бұрын

Lol fingers crossed 🤞

Good thing is, NATO are monitoring every move Russia makes. They will know if a nuclear strike is going to happen, and will most certainly have the high ground, to take action

@Aaqe

Жыл бұрын

Exactly.

@cyborgclarke

Жыл бұрын

And such a response by Nato would have Putin launch all his nukes at Nato and the US without question

@giuseppeanoardi3973

Жыл бұрын

@@cyborgclarke And how many, considering the state of russian equipment and the consistent theft of parts by corrupted official, do you think can actually take the flight?

@Brian-om2hh

Жыл бұрын

@@cyborgclarke But Putin might find targeting a little difficult if his targeting satellites had been taken out. And that would happen in the first 15 minutes of any potential nuclear launch....

@Qwijebo

Жыл бұрын

Putin isn't dumb like many Pentagon generals who are just as useless as Biden.

Awesome General!

It makes me ill to talk about this honestly, nobody hates someone that much

Interesting interview

All through the cold war and after, even during the Ukraine war, nuclear powers were always deathly afraid of any kind of direct military confrontation between each other due to the doctrine of mutually assured destruction. Now we speak rather casually of direct military confrontation with Russia if Putin were to use tactical nukes.

I've been watching "Threads" on my computer today and I'll be finishing it off in due course. I've never actually felt so terrified watching a film until now, especially given how realistic it is. It's absolutely terrifying because this is where we are now.

2:25 Kerch Bridge was mentioned and a day later, boom it's gone! Crazy!

nice to hear a voice of reason in the cacophony of wild speculations and fear mongering we used to call news media.

Love to know what Putin tells Xi about starting WW3

@TDurden527

Жыл бұрын

Good point. Xi may not look at that prospect very positively.

@enigma1000

Жыл бұрын

I wonder what XI is saying to Putin about getting out of Ukraine and stopping his war.

@TDurden527

Жыл бұрын

@@enigma1000 If only I were a fly on the wall.

@therepublic7708

Жыл бұрын

Xi will support putin he wants tiwan and he is old man.By April 2023 will happen when tiwan is invaded.

He was answering your question. Let the man finish! You must be real proud of your voice!

The fundamental question is how do you stop a mad man with his finger on the button???

@douglastaggart9360

Жыл бұрын

I've the same worries about biden.

@User-jr7vf

Жыл бұрын

No worries, there is no mad man and no nuclear button.

What are response options if they use chemical weapons? I think that’s a more likely scenario.

@pureruckuspower2165

Жыл бұрын

They used them in Syria. We did nothing.

@pjhgerlach

Жыл бұрын

It's also a WMD so there will be a a response this time.

@pureruckuspower2165

Жыл бұрын

@@pjhgerlach so are chemical weapons. And again. We did nothing when saran was used in syria.

@ChilledfishStick

Жыл бұрын

One thing that I don't understand is why are chemical weapons, so inherently worse than conventional weapons? There was little to no response to leveling of cities, mass rapes and murders. How will chemical weapons escalate the situation further?

@Bobbydazzlla

Жыл бұрын

NATO air force planes will be added to the equation. If Russia thinks they have issues now, they haven't seen anything yet.

That's cool that Louis CK takes breaks from comedy to let us know about the war.

Why don't you put the name of the guest in the description?

Will you just listen carefully to Former Gen. Breedlove and do nit interrupt him as he is still talking.

Putin is 70 years overdue in life

@tomparth3398

Жыл бұрын

You mean Biden...

just plant trees. spread the love❤ just talk . nobody wins

Good interview 👍👍😃

Conventionally strike the Russian nuke launchers.

@LutherusPXCs

Жыл бұрын

A lot of them are too far inside Russia

@chriswalford9228

Жыл бұрын

@@LutherusPXCs and mobile

@northwalescoast7911

Жыл бұрын

How ?

@customboatscreensolutions5893

Жыл бұрын

There all in nuclear submarines so a very impossible task

@stevenbevis9290

Жыл бұрын

Cant get the ballistic missile subs !

General Breedlove’s analysis of the status of Russian troops as we enter winter, is dead on. What Russia is going to end up with is 1000s of men starving and freezing to death... no/little ammo and zero desire to fight. Ukraine needs to be prepared to take 1000s of men as POWs over a short period of time.

@Mainyehc

Жыл бұрын

It’s interesting how they won’t learn from, of all people, Napoleon!

Thank you

“They could drop the Kerch strait bridge”… interesting!

Russia has no idea how bad things will get if A10 warthogs get involved...

@urbanurchin5930

Жыл бұрын

....ironically, A-10's are not even considered "cutting edge" anymore ! But they sure would cut some serious destruction if they were used......

@TDurden527

Жыл бұрын

@@urbanurchin5930 I'm thinking once the anti-air was suppressed . . . ya, the A10's are devastating.

@secretgoldfish931

Жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/nnV5s9mlfsiyYNY.html

@douglastaggart9360

Жыл бұрын

You've been watching too many rambo films.

Why would U.S. response to Russia-Ukraine conflict be any more successful than its response to Taliban in Afghanistan? Two reasons 1. Ukraine is shouldering much of this war (U.S. is not losing people) 2. Black Sea which allows any country to supply UKRAIN with food/weapons easily.

@MistressOP

Жыл бұрын

Yeah but afgan is different. One its hard to conquer people that spread out. With any number of troops if they don't have some level of turn coat buy in that's real. If Afghan had like a queen. Empire Or something they believed in. the occupation could have been outsource but you can't make a nation if a nation doesn't feel itself as a nation.

Excellent assessment.

Respect the General, don’t interrupt his point.

And can you tell me what will happen when we strike back even if it’s his navy fleet they would retaliate back then boom 🤯

we need a special Nato operation in Ukraine

@TDurden527

Жыл бұрын

To help ruzzia with their goodwill gestures, lol😀

@adiosa1388

Жыл бұрын

russians actually believe they are fighting NATO in Ukraine

@douglastaggart9360

Жыл бұрын

And you need to get a brain

He's right, straight to the point

Bolton is slightly mad.

I wonder if NATO members hit by radioactive fallout could invoke article 5 and consider Russia’s tactical nuke in Ukraine an attack on them, thus obligating NATO to reply?

@thetruthnothingelse5033

Жыл бұрын

Nato will use missiles planes etc not need ground troups. Like the gunship stealth bomberd etc they will smasch all Russian forces in just a couple of days, the targets plans are already in place, the planes and missiles are allready fueld up.

@mike004692

Жыл бұрын

thats been spoke about many times already

@bernardetacoker4663

Жыл бұрын

Yes. It has been published already

@marcos.1771

Жыл бұрын

Yes, absolutely.

@Northman-from-the-North

Жыл бұрын

Of course, any single bequerel higher than normal on the West side would trigger article 5.

It's very interesting he speaks about a conventional response to a nuke from russia. Putin has lost his best tank brigade, the one he'd parade and is supposed to protect the Kremlin, very early in their invasion. A conventional military take out by the US, NATO, etc. would be relatively easy, since the brave Ukrainans have basically won, it's just a matter of time. UA have some genius PR moves like having a nice price list for equipment like tanks, BMPs, helicopters, etc. and a guarantee of being treated well, if they surrender. Couple this with the fact that the corruption within the russian military means they can't even give their conscripts uniforms.

@w.okkerse915

Жыл бұрын

You don't understand that a lot of Russians are prepared to die for Crimea and The Donbas. Like a lot of Amerikans are prepares to die for Florida. The question that you should ask yourself is whether you are also prepared to die for these regions? The stakes are simply much higher for the Russians. So you better not get into a fight with them over this.

@argon8908

Жыл бұрын

source: trust me bro!

@pedropaula3341

Жыл бұрын

Yeah. But Putin would not retaliate with conventional forces. He would escalate with nukes. Then what? The fact that the west does not use nukes, does not mean putin won't use them.

Why don’t you let finish his response first before you start asking another question

Crazy times, man.

Though I believe there are options other than a nuclear response, the fear or the use of more nuclear weapons would cause either Russia, or any other countries would cause them to respond. Any county unafraid to use nuclear weapons would be seen as an extreme threat, and untrustworthy. It would be difficult then to deescalate the situation from nuclear, therefore any use can likely lead to nuclear war, and the end of the world.

@secretgoldfish931

Жыл бұрын

I agree with what you’re saying, but Mutually Assured Destruction is contingent upon rational actors. We’re trying to figure that out with Putin. He may well think there’s not much point in a world if he’s not in it.

@XboxxxGuy

Жыл бұрын

Disagree. Nukes were used during WWII. The world is still here. Nuclear weapons being used doesn't necessarily lead to that outcome.

@Coneelfrancis

Жыл бұрын

@@XboxxxGuy those were 2. We are talking thousands of nukes one time

@kevinsisler9379

Жыл бұрын

@@secretgoldfish931 That is my point. Putin doesn't seem rational. If we simply attack Russia in response, showing they weren't afraid to use them, they would probably respond with another nuclear attack. It could probably escalate. The best hope if Putin goes nuclear, one of his more rational men would stop him.

@kevinsisler9379

Жыл бұрын

@@XboxxxGuy Nuclear weapons today are different than atomic bombs then. There was no other nuclear, or atomic response we had to worry about then. People saw the effects, and hadn't been used in war since. It was then used as a deterrence since.

These type of what if interviews are becoming tiresome. Nobody knows, or would reveal what they would do if they get punched on the nose. There a spectrum of responses. The interviewers might as well answer these questions themselves instead of passing the voice to retired military personnel to speculate.

@urbanurchin5930

Жыл бұрын

....and the hosts are continually trying to goad the guest into interjecting "sensationalized" dialogue. Yes, it is becoming tiresome.....

@User-jr7vf

Жыл бұрын

In this case there is no difference between presenter and retired military officer, the two have become one and the same.

> They could drop the Kerch Strait bridge Well, that aged with perfect timing

Whatever happened to the days when news broadcasters would asking questions instead of asking for validation to pre-prepared statement their handlers prepared?

Great general and very reasonable man - that is the main reason why US Forces are the best in the world. PS. I am not American, but German, so I am allowed to make such judgement ;-)

@douglastaggart9360

Жыл бұрын

I think you'll find the British army is far superior to the American army.

🇺🇦💖👍

Let the man speak and stop interrupting him for gods sake

There is a verbal agreement any one use nukes we got everything you need you

Advice to Times Radio presenters, be more prepared. You have these interesting people on your show and seem to have stock questions instead of making the conversation interesting with follow up questions.

@rayfighter

Жыл бұрын

I agree. 2:06 answer was hopefully clear enough for them to stop asking these "armageddon?" questions over and over again. Still, Times Radio is among the best, and that's why we want them to fine tune their reporting, don't we :)

@OneFingerYT

Жыл бұрын

I didn't even want to watch the video. I just came to observe that I keep seeing them wanting to talk about nuclear war over and over and over and over and over like a comedian shill bashing Trump. I lost interest in seeing any of their videos, as they are clearly just playing off fear.

I love this interview, this action need to be demonstrated to the putler 🇺🇦🇺🇸

What effect do you think winter will have on the war.

"they could drop the Kertch bridge he said"... Already done

@Brian-om2hh

Жыл бұрын

not entirely. It is apparently passable in one direction. The Russians are using a system of traffic control to allow traffic movement in both directions. The railway bridge looks as though it may be structurally weakened though. Concrete and excess heat don't sit well together.

He's trolling the west, playing mind games lol when he said he is not bluffing he actually means he is bluffing mr poker face

@genemcn3579

Жыл бұрын

He's trolling his nation into destruction. Russia is bleeding men who don't want to be there. What a joke.

@Jp-kb3op

Жыл бұрын

@@genemcn3579 When you Economy only is the size of the state of Texas, thats just not possible. He's trolling the west, playing mind games lol when he said he is not bluffing he actually means he is bluffing mr poker face. I really doubt he is going to drop some or even one LOL, we do not even know how many of Russia's nukes even work lol since a lot of money has to be spent to keep all of them in great condition like every year or every few years. Let's see what happens by the end of this year.

Yes but what about Putins response to Nato’s response?

@Anonymous-ld7je

Жыл бұрын

He won't have much an army, navy, or airforce left to respond with. He could finally accept defeat and make peace with Ukraine, or he could try to destroy earth in a nuclear armageddon... over Ukraine. It's a binary choice. And I'm not discounting the possibility of choice #2, I just see it as less likely than a peace treaty. The Soviet union knew when further fighting in Afghanistan was pointless. Maybe he'd realize the total destruction of Russia in a nuclear exchange isn't worth Kherson, Crimea, and the Donbass in Ukraine. Sounds utterly illogical. Putin has been foolish, but I don't think he is incapable of logic... there's also the possibility Putin orders the nuclear strikes then is overthrown by the military. Just because he decides not to care about the survival of Russia, doesn't mean his subordinates will stop caring. Their families will die too. It might finally be the final step too far that the military is not willing to cross for him.

@jamesgavin6171

Жыл бұрын

Yea people seem to forget the most important part dont they.

So you invite an expert person onto your program and Interrupt him.

So much more level-headed than that chicken hawk Bolton. Rational, knows the bounds of law and knows when to not answer a question.

Not long now until put up or shut up.. Long live ukraine💙💛

make moscow look like Mariupol. Slava Ukraine💙💛

@douglastaggart9360

Жыл бұрын

Why you want that?

I think you’re correct Mr 👍

Kerch bridge you say?... Hold my пиво!

Ukraine just need to overpower and overtake all of Russian territory with the help of NATO. Case closed period.

@robertwilson214

Жыл бұрын

Mindless supine obedience to western elites.....deserves all that's coming.

@BattleshipOrion

Жыл бұрын

More like Russia as we know it will have serious lines redrawn on the west, & a few islands taken away in the east. Nothing more.

@dennisnaderhoff2008

Жыл бұрын

So you saw what 80 cruise missiles could do. How about 500, or 1000. And 500 and a thousand again, along with Russia's Navy, sending in the big missiles. They don't need nukes. They could put the Ukraine down anytime. Russia is the second largest nuclear power on earth. And in stockpile of

@dennisnaderhoff2008

Жыл бұрын

Continued..... and in stock piles of conventional missiles. They've been a country twice as long as the United States. The Ukraine knows that. We need both to back off. If that doesn't happen, the Ukraine stands to lose the most or all. We don't need more dead.

Why do we have intelligent, experienced tacticians like this commenting on the situation and complete idiots in charge of it?

@Mr.Monta77

Жыл бұрын

Who are these supposed idiots you refer to? I’m extremely glad we have serious, adult and experienced leaders in charge of US/NATO.

@WintersFinalstand

Жыл бұрын

Whom might be the idiots?

@peterthomason6088

Жыл бұрын

@@WintersFinalstand over the last 239 years the US has been at war for 222 of them. In terms of peacekeeping thats not a great track record. Bidens corruption is irrefutable. With arms deal backhanders and a bent US President, that doesnt make a good recipe for peace even if you get a another country to fight your wars by proxy

@bantheshift

Жыл бұрын

@@Mr.Monta77 He thinks the people he sees on TV talking are the ones who would be leading our tactical warfare efforts.

@db7610

Жыл бұрын

@@Mr.Monta77 NATO want war to continue. They are idiots.

frightening

I see Georgia tech items in the video. General Breedlove did you go to GT. My son graduated from GT and it is an impressive school.

Goodby russian navy.

@douglastaggart9360

Жыл бұрын

Why where as it gone