Endeavoring to interpret prophetic Scripture correctly. If you think this channel contains valuable information, please share with people you know and on social media. Thanks.
Channel for the book:
"Hidden Rhythms in Prophecy: How Astronomical Cycles Interpret Prophecies in Daniel, Jeremiah and Ezekiel"
tinyurl.com/j9gs89a
The challenge still stands for anyone to show anything that is inaccurate or false about any content. It's been over 7 years now since I released this information to the public and no one has been able to find fault with anything. It's been over 15 years since I started contacting well-known Bible teachers, pastors and prophecy experts. No one has responded with any issues so far.
Пікірлер
Wow, what an exhaustive study of Joseph of Arimathea
I like your presentations. You are so thorough.
Thank you. That means a lot. If these things I present are in fact true, all the details need to be consistent.
Thank you. I really appreciate this your study. ❤❤❤ Yosef in the Chosen tv series.
AMAZING BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP!
Thank you for that. A lot of people don't recognize that especially if it goes against their preconceived notions.
The calendar is so simple I can do it. It is determined by the new moon.
Yes, it is simple in concept - especially when in history the phases of the moon were exactly 30 days long. But now there are many opinions of exactly what part of the New Moon should begin the month. That is why the importance of the ripeness of winter barley at Jerusalem is of vital importance.
The Egyptian calendar had established observations of orion even 16000bc. Look at the evidence of nabta playa by brophy
16000 BC? LOL. Creation was only 6000 years ago. Whatever you are talking about is total fantasy.
@@eclipseeventsigns nope. Brophy is an archer astronomer from uc berkeley. Legit. Studying paleo history
@@jperez7893 Appealing to authority is a fool's game. Experts who start with wrong assumptions have incorrect results. If this is your best defense, this discussion is over. First principles is where it's at.
The story of Esther! God bless you! Shalom!🙏👑🌹
the problem with your date is that the eclipse of the battle of gibeon does not happen on the correct year. using the assyrian eponym canon establishing Bur-Sagale eclipse of June 15, 763 BC and getting the anchor date for king hezekiah and the regnal years of kings to king solomon and 480 years as recorded in the MT, we get wednesday march 25, 1446 bc, and this is neatly corroborated by an eclipse visible at gibeon with a 91% obscuration on july 14, 1406 bc
It's not really a problem when you realize (and study) that the calendars for all cultures changed around 700 BC. Why? The miracle of the backwards sundial during King Hezekiah. At that time the year was only 360 days long. After that, the year became what we normally experience of 365.25+ days long. Therefore, any eclipse year calculations can not be trusted before 700 BC. None of your dates you state are accurate.
@@eclipseeventsigns that is very untenable because the egyptian calendar is well defined at 365 days marching though the sothic cycle, the babylonians understood the metonic cycle to adjust the calendar with intercalary months to account for leap years. and these have been known for thousands of years
@@jperez7893 Your statements are not accurate. The Babylonian understanding of the metonic cycle started roughly around 700 BC. In the "Babylonian Chronology" one can see the wild variations of just when they started to apply the metonic cycle around 700 BC. But then it settles to a very regular and predicable pattern roughly around 550 BC. Coincidentally around the time that Daniel would have become the head of the Babylonian astrologers and head of the calendar for the empire.
@@eclipseeventsigns you forget the egyptian which hasn't changed its calendar and sothic system of calendrical counting for thousands of years until the installation of the ptolemaic dynasty. some scholars are puting the date of the start of the calendar as early as 4243 bc
@@jperez7893 You don't even address the things which torpedo your statements. Not forgetting anything Egyptian. First, the Egyptologists have no clue about the actual timeline of Egyptian history. They tie things to eclipses which I've shown can not be trusted before 700 BC. Second, when I did a deep dive into the calendars of ancient Egypt, scholars make many assumptions which do not hold water. Things which are assumed are not as cut and dry as they make it out to be. The 365 day calendar was a relatively modern (after 700 BC) invention.
Mathew gives josephs perspective Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's.. Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
Your statements are absolutely not true. Luke's gospel specifically states that it is Joseph's genealogy. Matthew is from Mary's.
Someone just provided me a link to your videos this evening and I have been enjoying going through them. I studied Anderson's work pretty thoroughly about 37 years ago and found errors. I also had the same questions about his work that you raise. As yourself, I also looked at various modifications to Anderson's work, but found them to be erroneous as well, just as you found. Nonetheless, I never did the deeper, independent study of these passages as you are presenting. Therefore, I very much appreciate this study you are presenting. Since my study of Anderson's work 37 years ago, I have come to learn biblical Hebrew well enough to use it heavily in my studies, which focus more on Torah. With this background, I have had no problem following your presentation and have appreciated your consistent approach to the Hebrew text. I am currently halfway through this fourth video where you state that there is no 'and' between the seven weeks and the sixty two weeks. Unfortunately, although your interlinear text is missing the vav-although the English includes an "and-your interlinear has a typographical error. The Hebrew text actually does have a vav as a prefix to the sixty two. The Hebrew text in Dan 9:25 reads, "עַד־מָשִׁ֣יחַ נָגִ֔יד שָׁבֻעִ֖ים שִׁבְעָ֑ה וְשָׁבֻעִ֞ים שִׁשִּׁ֣ים וּשְׁנַ֗יִם תָּשׁוּב֙ וְנִבְנְתָה֙ רְחֹ֣וב" Although you state that your interpretation depends significantly on this vav being absent, I personally do not think this statement is accurate. The existence of this vav simply means that the KJV method of translation is reasonable. However, the ESV is still a more accurate translation. To be sure, note that the JPS translation is similar to the ESV, stating, "unto one anointed, a prince, shall be seven weeks; and for threescore and two weeks, it shall be built again". This reflects the stated vav but like the ESV, recognizes the separation of phrasing. I believe the JPS and ESV are the more accurate translations of this sentence, just as you state. Continuing with this video, I see that you make a point of tying the end of the sixty two weeks to the birth of Messiah. I think this connection is an assumption and is questionable. In addition, having studied the date of Messiah's birth, I believe your date of 6 BC is very questionable. Furthermore, the text simply does not suggest this connection of the sixty two weeks to the Messiah's birth. On the contrary, the text presents the sixty two week as a description of the period of repairing and building the city (and sanctuary?). I see no indication that this ends with either the birth or the death of Messiah. Rather, the simple presentation of the text suggests that the sixty two weeks ends with the completion of the work. Dan 9:26 then states, "And AFTER the sixty two weeks...", further indicating that the end point of the sixty two weeks is not necessarily the death of Messiah. Rather, the Messiah's death happens sometime after the sixty two weeks has concluded, though suggesting some proximity. Even so, the end point of the sixty two weeks seems to be related to the end of construction. It is interesting to note that Herod completed his construction around 10 BC. If Artaxerxes decree was in 444 BC, then 434 years would take that to 10 BC.
Thanks for that well reasoned response. Other commenters should take note of how to properly present differences of opinion like this. No one element I present is all important. They are like cogs which can fit together and as a whole they present the entire intricate workings of the prophecy/history. As to the end of the 62 Weeks and how they tie into the birth of a messiah. You are correct, there is nothing found in Daniel 9 about this. But the other cogs I present start to make this connection and it eventually becomes clear that this is the case. The AFTER is describing the death of this messiah. If we know the historical date of this death and the end of the 62 Weeks is within an average life span and close to that date, then it is a natural connection to tie the two together. But that is not actual evidence. The addition evidence comes from the additional cycles that are running through history. The Sabbatical year cycles. The Eclipse Event cycles. And others. These are the other cogs that show that 6 BC MUST be the year of Messiah's birth. And April 25, 31 AD MUST be the date of Messiah's death.
Finally the truth about who the old man was who requested Christ's body. It seems he would not be given Christ's body if not a Jewish relative.. I once found a genealogy chart for Christ, it listed Joseph of Aramathea as Christ's great uncle, I think.
It's a very common assumption by the churches who use the Aramaic language New Testament. Because of the exact word used.
'gbra' (Aramaic) means "mighty man" or "big man" - - and means pretty much what our contemporary "old man" does: depending on context, it can mean either father or husband. In this *highly* geneological context, it'd lean toward father. And the last block of 14 generations won't count correctly any other way. Don't ignore checksums - - they're there to help! However, one compelling item still in your favor is that we have 'begats' all the way Mt. 1 until we get to Joseph, who does not 'begat' Mary, but rather is this 'gbra'. Whether father or guardian, it is every bit as likely that Joseph had simply died by the time of Jesus' ministry, as many others infer. If he were still alive, why would Jesus turn to John on the cross and tell him to look after his mother? The eldest son providing for his widowed mother makes sense: doing that if he were still alive would not. Also note that other Scripture in the gospels covers reactions to Jesus' ministry by his mother and his brethren (including betimes that they though he'd gone off the rails) - but nothing about Joseph. Your making Mary's "Joseph" == the one of Arimathea always begs explaining how a carpenter got rich and because a prominent council member. Still chewing on Mary being of the tribe of Levi. I'd never considered that before. Many thanks for your input here!
As I explain it is all about how the Aramaic word is used IN CONTEXT. It can NOT mean father.
We might all disagree, nonetheless we are told to search the scriptures diligently for ourselves in prayer and thanks giving. Bless you brother our found it food for thought.
What I want to know is: If Mary the mother of Jesus Christ was born?/raised? in the hill country in the town of Ramah, how was she betrothed to Joseph of Nazareth? That was a significant distance between the two towns, and also I assume that any female descendant of Levi would not be given in marriage to just anyone. 🧐
Both Joseph and Mary were descendants of David. But additionally Mary was also a descendant of Aaron, on her mother's side. We do not know why she would have resettled to Nazareth where Joseph was also living.
Mathew gives josephs perspective Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's.. Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
I always believed that Joseph of aremethea was an uncle to Mary mother of Jesus
This geneology of Mary is exactly what I have come to conclude by reading the Arameic texts, that Mary is a descendant of Levi, and NOT David. The Mesianic Jews claim that Mary was a descendant of David when questioned about how Yeshua is a descendant of David if Joseph (who is a descendant of David) is not his father. So, if Mary is a Levite, then Yeshua HAS to be the biological son of Joseph to be a descendant of David, otherwise the prophecies were not fulfilled that he would come from the line of David. The Davidic line must be passed through the fathers line, not the mothers line.
God s Great, remember.
In Luke 3:23-38 Mary's paternal side comes from the lineage of Judah to David. While traditionally her maternal side is from the lineage of Levi. So Jesus is a Royal Priest; He both King and Priest. Judah is the symbol of Kingship, while Levites are Priesthood
@@user-ob8vx7mx1s Mary's geneology doesnt matter whatsoever when it comes to tribal lineage in Judaism. Tribal lineage ONLY comes through the biological father's bloodline. So, either the virgin birth story was a lie, or Yeshua is not the messiah because he is not a descendant of David. You can not have it both ways. Tribal lineage ONLY goes through the bloodline of the biological father. Adoption does NOT grant tribal lineage. He must be a flesh and blood descendant of David, through his biological father.
@@user-ob8vx7mx1s and no, Mary is a Levite, Not from the Davidic line. Her father was a Levite, it doesn't matter what her mother was because tribal lineage doesn't go through maternal line, ONLY paternal.
@@WH6FQE where is the evidence that Mary was a Levite?
I was thinking that jesus was the nephew of Joseph. He must have been a Levi same as Mary Jesus mother
Very good research! Only error is your German attributed name of God. You will not ever find the pronunciation you use in any ancient Hebrew bible. There are tons of evidence and actual “ANCIENT “ codex pronunciations of YEHOVAH. You would be wise to truly investigate from Hebrew sources to give correct honor to God’s glory by His name. Other than that, nice job!
Thanks. Not sure what you are referring to. But in any case, getting the pronunciation "right" is not that important. God is not being "conjured" based on how you say His name.
@@eclipseeventsigns Wow, I'm astounded at your response. Of course God's name is not like a genie in a bottle, but he makes it very clear that his name is very important to HIM, despite what we might think. He dedicated one of the ten commands to not make False Vows specifically USING HIS NAME. Yeshua also put it at the head of what we call the Lords's prayer "Hallowed, Sacred, Set-apart" is your name. In John 17 he declares making Father's name known to his decibels, and that he will CONTINUE to make it known. So important that God placed his holy unique name 6,827 times just in the Tanakh alone. Malachi 2:1-2
@@4robertbates There was nothing to be astounded by. I just don't agree with people making a huge issue of the EXACT pronounciation as if it is a magic spell. The main point is the power/person that is behind the "name". Not the mouth shapes that utter a particular set of sounds. Otherwise the word "Jesus" that has been used is totally meaningless. That was not the Messiah's actual name. It was Yeshuah.
Mathew gives josephs perspective Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's.. Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
This is really great! I will ask as important as joseph Arimathea was in the Bible A relative they need to let their dead rest. Its like someone writing on your dresses ancestors photos its disrespectful and need to 🛑 Be respectful of other people property .Do not write on personal photoa are were going have real problems. These are the things that the Lord him self spoke of wicked acts. And cause division ➗ And someone need to find out who is causing thins its not coming from us but someone is doing it.
Thank you that is astonishing ... and great research. " Kinsman Redeemer" is a glorious title, the title of Boaz, yes, but, even more of our Lord. Thank you so much!
In this context, since only the Kohathite were charged with carrying the Ark of God and the tabernacle, which was wrongly placed on the cart and pulled by oxen by the Philistines, and Uzza was killed by merely helping to keep it stable when the ox stumbled. David learned from this and kept the ark in the house of Obededom, a Kohathite. The ark was then carried from his house to the tabernacle prepared for it, by Kohathite priests. Thus, only a Kohathite can be worthy of touching and carrying the body of Jesus Christ and prepared for burial. Had any other done this, it would greatly impact the sacrificial work of Jesus Christ because he would have died as well . He was the only human who was closest to Jesus Christ, physically, apart from the Mary who anointed Him with the perfume, and wiped His feet with her hair after His birth, to ever touch and prepare Him for burial. The women didn't get the chance later because He was already risen from the dead! 1 Samuel 6; 2 Samuel 6; 1 Chronicles 15:21; 25:24-25; Numbers 4:15. Jesus Christ- Priest and King, as David also was the King of Israel, who also was the only King permitted to offer sacrifices, 2 Samuel 24:25, wearing the ephod, 2 Samuel 6:14; which was solely a priestly duty, and was spared by God! King Uzziah tried to offer incense but was struck with leprosy. 2 Chronicles 26:28-21.
Thank you l will check out your references, it is a significant insight that David performed a priestly function.
@@carldodd5428 Absolutely!
Good analysis. One thing you might know, but was not mentioned: the Israelites never mentioned a daughter as being "begotten" of. This term was only reserved for sons. Daughters were rarely mentioned in genealogies. Women were rather mentioned by referring to their head (or master) in the household. This could be their father (or adoptive father or kinsman redeemer) if they were under age. As soon as they got married, their husband would be their head of the household, and they would then be referred to by his headship. Great information and comprehensive. 🙂👍🏻
Mathew gives josephs perspective Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's.. Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
@@tasmarkou5681 You've got it exactly wrong. Matthew gives Mary's lineage from earliest to latest. If you don't include Mary in the genealogy, you have to accept that Matthew was wrong in his mention of the 3 X 14 generations. The Joseph mentioned is NOT her husband (her husband's father was Heli; while this Joseph's father was Jacob - the English translation misinterprets the original term "man", which denotes the head of the household, and since she was unmarried, her head would be her father or Kinsman Redeemer. Girls were also never mentioned as "begat of", but when mentioned were listed by referring to the head of their household. This is confirmed by ancient and original manuscripts.) Luke clearly states at the beginning of his genealogy that, "Jesus ... was regarded as the son of Joseph, the son of Heli", and lists the genealogy from latest to earliest. There is no question that this is Jesus's descent through his adoptive father Joseph - Mary's Husband. I'm not arguing about the fact that lineage can continue through a daughter, but that is the exception and has no relevance in this discussion. It does apply when speaking of Yeshua, the Son of God though.
@@deniss2 well that's what I was clarifying
@@tasmarkou5681 but you have it the wrong way round....
Very informative talk, u know ur stuff!
I appreciate that!
Great job
Thank you.
The course of Abia tells you when Jesus was conceived and born
sept, 29
@@SteveBurke03181962 Yep
Joseph Bar Matthias saw 3 friends on crosses. He asked Titus and received permission for them to be taken down and placed in his custody. 2 died and one lived.
What does that even mean? Where is there proof for what you are claiming?
@@eclipseeventsigns Joseph Bar Matthias is better known as Josephus. It's in one of his 2 books.
@@tomhohl4373 Again. Proof? What books?
@@eclipseeventsigns It was either "The Jewish War" or "The Antiquities" and it's not worth my time to re-read hundreds of pages just to try to convince someone who won't be convinced anyway. Whether you believe me or not, if you believe Jesus was God, sent by God into the world, you should learn about the world he was sent into. And Josephus offers the only detailed eye witness account of the events of 1st century Judea. If you believe in Jesus, you should read it for yourself.
@@tomhohl4373 Oh, I have read Josephus very closely. It's one of the main proofs that the New Testament was originally written in Aramaic and NOT Greek. And it's how I know that what you claim is NOT true. You said it wasTitus that gave permission. There was no one in power named Titus in Jerusalem during the crucifixion of Jesus.
Passover was on a Wednesday when Jesus was crucified 😊
Yes, it was. I have 2 videos with a lot of evidence for that.
@@eclipseeventsigns I have the companion Bible
@@eclipseeventsignsjesus Christ died on Passover, 14. Nisan, Friday, April 3, 33 ad at 3 pm. The last supper was held on Tuesday night on the Passover of the essenes. He was arrested the same night and presented to the mock court of the sadducees and the high priest annas. The trial before the sanhedrin was the day of Wednesday from the first tamid to the second tamid (9am to 3 pm) Cross examination before pilate was Thursday morning and audience before herod was Thursday afternoon. Crucified on Friday Passover of the jews. This chronology was not possible before the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls and deciphering the essene calendar
@@jperez7893 The things you state are just not possible. See my other videos with plenty of proofs which show why what you state is impossible.
@@eclipseeventsigns sorry. The blood moon eclipse of 3april 33 ad fits all conditions as the day of crucifixion on a Friday
Joseph was a tin miner in Glastonbury England 😊
There is no Biblical evidence for that. Neither is there any historical documentation for that. It's just a legend.
@@eclipseeventsigns Yes there is. E Raymond Capt has a documentary on it called Traditions of Glastonbury where Joseph is buried
@@bluesky6985 There is NO evidence. Just because someone claims something doesn't mean it's true. I've looked into the supposed evidence and there is none.
@@eclipseeventsigns The Glastonbury thorn.
@@bluesky6985 Tradition, legend and fanciful thinking. There is no biblical evidence. None whatsoever.
You make a good attempt at trying to show the impact of the calendars, but you do know that what you did is adding to the Enoch Calendar, and it isn't perfect. This is why there is debate at what day Christ was killed, and questions if He eating a Passover supper like the Essenes or like the Temple..
There is nothing to do with the Enoch calendar. That is 364 days long. It is not accurate. Neither has it ever been officially used.
@@eclipseeventsigns are you saying Enoch and the children of Israel never used the Enochian solar calendar?
@@atruecreation2258 No. The Enoch calendar was never in official use in any time at any point in the history of Israel. Never. Not at any time. The calendar does not follow the instructions that God gave in order to construct His true calendar. The clue is in your very words - the "solar" calendar. God gave the sun AND the moon in order to construct the calendar. Both are needed. If a calendar does not use the moon, then it is not according to God's instructions.
@@eclipseeventsigns are you familiar with the Essenes? They were the curators of the Dead Sea Scrolls. They used the Enochian solar calendar...
@@atruecreation2258 Of course. However, they were a sect of Judaism. If they used a solar calendar, that does not mean it was the official calendar used by the temple. Again, God is very plain in the Pentateuch of exactly how His calendar should be constructed. Both by the sun AND the moon.
The video that I posted was one of the first videos that took a 7,000 year look at this prophecy. This is before Ken Johnson, it would have been nice if you would have reached out to me to see why I came to the conclusion that I did, but I guess, my view count isn't good enough to be considered. Or perhaps you didn't see my video, only the Most High knows why. Anyways, however, you felt, may the Most High God give you peace and prosperity in all you do... Shalom
I did not base any research on YT videos. I go to the original sources. And this is all research that is my own personal research that I've done for decades already. So I don't know anything that you are referring to.
@@eclipseeventsigns but didn't you say that you saw a Ken Johnson video over 2 years ago? So you have used KZread at least as an entertainment purpose to watch other people's views on Enoch, right? Even if it drove you to a different conclusion...
@@atruecreation2258 Sure I watch other people's presentations. But doesn't mean I used them or that they originated with them. Many people have very wrong ideas about things. Ken Johnson is one such person. What's your point?
@@eclipseeventsigns well, in your video you mentioned many points that I brought up end the video that I made. I was just curious if you watched my video...
@@atruecreation2258 Nope. I don't even know the video you are talking about. My research goes back decades already. Not based on any video
No first century copies of the gospels exist in Aramaic. The earliest copies of the texts are in Greek. How do you conclude that differing words "man" and "husband" were used in the original Aramaic? It's still debated whether there even was an original Aramaic.
No first century copies of the gospels exist in Greek either. The different words are in the Aramaic text just as I showed. You can check it out for yourself. The Greek text uses the same word. This is evidence that the Aramaic was first - not Greek.
@@eclipseeventsigns The gospel authors wrote in Greek. Any Aramaic text is derived from the Greek.
@@devindevon There is no actual proof for your statement. There is evidence that it was Greek translated from Aramaic.
I have looked at AD 21 and NM fell on Jan 2, Jan 31, Mar 2, Mar 31, Apr 30. Can you please say which moon phase site used tje date you are using?
This is most facinating, great research, thank you and thank God.
The problem with the g o s p e l s is that the early churchfathers picked and chose only those that fit their agenda of m i n d c o n t r o of the masses. The current KING JAMES version of the bible has been r e d a c t e d Crucial gospels ,such as the gospel of Mary (n o t the whore !!) or the gospel of Judas are missing . Also missing are the teachings on r e i n c a r n a t i o n and what happened in his l o s t years while travelling in the East There is evidence that he s u r v i v e d his crucifixion and left Jerusalem for good....he went to KASHMIR in order to teach another Semitic tribe living there . His tomb is in KASHMIR.Currently,researchers and scientists wait for green light from the Indian government to do f o r e n s i c research on what was left in the coffin there Sorry to bust your bubble !
Excellent
Great work! What are your thoughts on the calendar expressed in the Dead Sea scrolls? That would have to be the oldest documented evidence of a biblical people keeping a specific calendar
"oldest documented evidence"? You mean the book of Exodus in the Bible where God gives the Israelites instructions about the calendar doesn't count? If you are referring to the 364 day Enoch calendar, that was never in official use in Israel at any time.
@@eclipseeventsigns I agree with you as I am trying to follow the true biblical calendar. Currently I follow the lunar solar 29/30 day month calendar with sabbaths falling on every 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th day then a new moon day then cycle begins again. This video basically explains it kzread.info/dash/bejne/op2JuKWon9fedps.htmlsi=KQsKyngczDTKf9Xw
@@eclipseeventsigns I agree with you and I am searching for the correct biblical calendar. This is what I use now kzread.info/dash/bejne/op2JuKWon9fedps.htmlsi=KQsKyngczDTKf9Xw
Thank you for this excellent work! Could you elaborate on the messiah as Cyrus, and the messiah that is cut off at the end of 62 weeks? So Daniel 9:25-26 has 2 different messiah?
Yes. It does. Even elsewhere in the Old Testament is very clear on this point.
wow
Wondering where to find the historical dates for Abib Jewish feasts from 6 B.C. to 0 B.C.?
You can find the Abib dates based on my calculations for the years 8 BC to 34 AD in my book. All calculations and sources are given so anyone can verify for themselves. I can't put in a lin-k. "Hidden Rhythms in Prophecy".
Greetings my friend,,, listening to you on this Easter Sunday…
Hi Easter= Astarte queen of heaven fertility goddess! JESUS THE JEWISH LAMB OF GOD THAT TAKETH AWAY THE SINS OF THE WORLD FULFILLED YHWH’S PROPHETIC FEAST OF PASSOVER ON YHWH’S BIBLICAL LUNI SOLAR CALENDAR WHICH JESUS YESHUA IS FULFILLING WITH HIS RETURN TO REIGN OVER THE NATIONS FROM JERUSALEM ON THE SEVENTH AND LAST FEAST OF TABERNACLES FOR THE SEVENTH MILLENNIUM TO THE GLORY OF GOD THE FATHER!
I think you’re on to something. Only thing is- you say Abrahams descendants are the Jewish people but failed to include his son Ishmael and their descendants.
According to God, the Jewish people are God's chosen people. Abraham had many other children through concubines. But they were sent away and do not share in the blessings.
You have a great question all I know she talked about 2 areas migdala and poriyah lllit.She showed that the ripening was definitely the beginning of February and Passover before February ended so it just makes me think how could other areas be that different I don't know but Becca biderman has some videos that prove in these areas that march would be way to late.Don't have answers but many questions and your videos are great again thanks.
It's just not possible for Passover to be before the spring equinox. Not possible. And not Biblical.
Thanks for the info,I have a question Becca binder man who lives in Israel in the year 2021 she proved the barley was ripe in february.This sounds like this is before the equinox she looked at the barley like the bible says so what do you do with the year 2021 if barley was before the equinox.thanks.
That's very interesting. I would need to know a lot more information about this. Was this near Jerusalem - since that is where the ripe barley mattered. Was this in a greenhouse or a wild field? Was this the majority of the barley or just a stray patch by a warm wall? That type of thing.
id like to see the sources for these. please post them in the description or in the comments
Thanks for the interest. You can see the sources very easily. I include the links in the video.
Question with regard to the dates you've mentioned: if you were to define a "margin of error" in your calculations, what would it be.... plus/minus few days? week? month? year? Thanks in advance.
Margin of error? God is always exact. If it's not exactly as it works out like this, then it is all completely wrong.
Thanks, sorry, I should clarify... I was referring to some of the future dates mentioned eg Feb 27, 2026. Am I correct in my understanding this is the beginning of the 70th week? or is it an approximate date?
or another way to look at it... does your research and insights accurately identify the coming future dates? and if not to the day then what (by the methods and research you've applied) would be the earliest date by which the beginning of (for example) the 70th week could start and what would be the latest date by which the 70th week must start? I'm asking 'cause I'm excited at the possibility that it all might be happening so soon! Also (and forgive me if you've already covered this) what do you see as the sign of the beginning of 70th week? some say "signing of the peace treaty" and others say the start of/appearing of the two witnesses... interested to know your thoughts. Cheers.
The yr of crucifixion was an intercalary yr and that is why you don't see it as friday. Why use the Mishna when it is not scripture and was written by those who would lie to hide the truth of Messiah? I started watching your vids because your name I supposed you dealt with eclipses to date things which would be a biblical method, the clock in the sky. I have been working on this on and off for several yrs.
I do describe how God has used eclipses to mark important events in the history of the people of Israel. That is the purpose of eclipses.
Awesome teaching!!!!
Another awesome video. btw, I'm also into GPGPU and have been doing realtime shader stuff /engine stuff since I was 12, I'm 35 now. I became a born again believer when I was 31. Offtopic: I had a dream/vision and something happened in my life that made me reach the same conclusion of 2032 that you came to but I am not a very thorough guy like you so everything I know was through a dream/vision or deep intuition and minimal reading so I can't really prove it. I was amazed when I saw an interview you did a few days ago that you did over 6 years ago and you told the same year I heard in my dream haha. Even more off topic: You probably noticed this but your linkedin has a 666 in the profile URL. My stackoverflow has a 666 in my profile URL. I took it as a sign I need to change something about the way I used to obsess over code. Your insights are probably better than mine. Let me know what you think. Sorry I never asked anything related to the video but I didn't know which other place to write this comment to reach out to you.
Did you mean to put 2025 AD and 2032 AD at your last week instead of BC?
Yes. Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't see that before.
Thanks for all your videos, I have learned from them very much. I don't think anything other than apostate end-times Jerusalem will be Mystery Babylon. It is the Great City, spiritually called Sodom and Egypt (both which also saw direct destruction from Yahweh), in which also our Lord was crucified. It is also the place where THE holy mountain is located, which is the temple mount, and itself is called Zion. Also, Mystery Babylon is dressed with all the same garments and materials described for the priestly class, as well as it trades in them. Its also the single city most likely to be turned on and destroyed by all the surrounding enemies, as we have seen since Oct 7, especially if there is a temple on the mount and Israel is in control of it.
Thanks for the support. The view that Jerusalem is Mystery Babylon is a common one. However, Rev 16:19 shows that it can't be. There are 3 cities mentioned in that verse and they all experience different results. There is the "great city" that splits in 3. There are the cities of the nations that fall. And there is Mystery Babylon that experiences God's wrath. Prophetic scripture of the Day of Yahweh no where states Jerusalem will suffer complete and utter destruction and will never be inhabited again - as it states for Mystery Babylon.
@@eclipseeventsigns I see what you mean, but it's not Mystery Babylon that will never be inhabited again. It's actual Babylon. To this day, it is not inhabited. It's just a ruin and nothing has been built on top of it like in Rome or other ancient capitals that continue to this day. Jerusalem is not Babylon. It's Secret Babylon. What's why it's a mystery. You can't be a Harlot to God unless you are cheating on God, going after another. Only Jerusalem is God's cheating bride
@@Annatar Rev 18:21 The angel said that Mystery Babylon will not be found, that is, exist, any longer. Rev 18:17 provides a very important clue. Talking about captains of ships, navigators who go to this place and sailors. Jerusalem is not a port city.
@@eclipseeventsigns Babylon was also inland. Jerusalem in flames would be seen from the sea easily anyway. And yes, mystery Babylon will not exist any longer. It will be faithful Jerusalem instead. But anyway, even if we disagree on this, I've learned a lot on your videos and I love the info. Keep up the amazing work
@@Annatar The other important point that many do not recognize is that the English transliteration "Babylon" is from Greek. When the Bible uses the term, it uses the same word for the capital of the Babylonian empire AND for the ancient place of the Tower where God confused humans with languages. The more I study Genesis and the more I research NEOM, the more I am convinced that there is the connection.