This is amazing!!! I have written all this down. 😊

Really impressed with your timeline of history. I have used a cursory present day back to May 14, 1948 study to arrive at 2022 for the year of return, as well. First, a couple of parameters. The scripture says that only God Almighty knows the day and hour of Jesus Christ’s appearing. It also says that we will know the season AND the fact that He is near, even at the door. So, without naming a day and an hour, we are completely walking according to the scripture. The scripture says that the the generation that sees the nation of Israel come back to life, will not pass away until ALL of these things take place which includes the seven year Great Tribulation period. So how long is a generation? There is a 20 year generation that died in the Wilderness because of unbelief, already come and gone since 1948. There is a generation of 40 years, once again, already come and gone. There is a number of 120 years for man after the flood. I simply don’t believe that man will make another 40 some years. My opinion is that a generation is 70, maybe 80 years if you are really strong as delineated by Moses in Psalm 90, the oldest psalm in the Bible. So take 1948 plus 70 = 2018 - 7 = 2011. On the strong end, take 1948 + 89 = 2037 - 7 = 2030. So our range of possible years for His appearing is 2011 through 2030 and to still accommodate including the final week of Daniel’s 70 weeks. Unlike many people who say that The Lord must appear at Rosh Hashanah, I personally believe that our deliverance will come this year shortly after Passover because the calendar is off at least 11 days and 3 hours, perhaps more and because God’s deliverance always occurs during or near Passover. Consider that the Ark came to rest on Mount Ararat the very same day in history that Jesus would be crucified. The Israelites would leave Egypt to go to worship God in the Wilderness and I believe that we will see His salvation this year on or near Passover. There are multiple reasons because of things that have or are occurring that point to this conclusion, but if not, I believe that some year at Passover between now and 2030, Jesus will appear to those who are eagerly awaiting and anticipating His appearing to catch us up for the Wedding of The Lamb! Maranatha! Even so come, Lord Jesus!

@arneedlund8512

2 жыл бұрын

To day Israelits life is about 83 years. Look it up if you want to. It's 83years from 1948 to 2031. 7 years before is 2025

@arneedlund8512

2 жыл бұрын

83=33+50 33,5 years was Jesus life Every 50 year is a free year

Been waiting for this every day! Others were close but you're pinned it down! I'm not too sharp but enough to know when someone else is...the Spirit testifies to it. Thank you Christ Jesus for you my brother! ❤️✝️

First, I wish to say thank you brother for your commitment to discipline to study and adherence to not just the text of scripture, but to the culture, calendar and original language of the biblical text! Such commitment is needed in the day and hour we live. Next, I submit that the uncovering of this information perfectly coincides with Daniel's prophecy, as he was instructed that it be sealed until the time of the end (12:4). It could not have happened before now, as the second part of the verse points to the explosion of technology and information including every modern invention from the automobile, radio and television, to the internet. Therefore, since G-d is a date setter, it stands to reason the He chose to keep this information hidden until now. Lastly, your timeline points to the year 2032 as the next significant event scheduled for Israel. It is interesting to note that those with "knowledge" all agree that the year 2030 is expected to bring a great change in the history of mankind as we know it. Based on the abib calendar, 2032 would be right about the same time. The book of Jubilees states that the people of G-d would forget the proper times and seasons of the biblical feasts and festivals, but it never said that we couldn't rediscover them. Thank you! Shalom shalom.

Thank you. Really appreciate your work. God bless you.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

You don't know how much that means to me.

@arneedlund8512

2 жыл бұрын

Me 2

Thank you and God so bless you for your time in studying to find the truth!

Thank you! God bless you.

Very good, I liked the whole presentation very much. There's one thing I can't understand though, which is, if christ was born in 6 BC and died on the cross in 31 AD, wouldn't that make him much older than he is said to have been in the scriptures when he died?

@eclipseeventsigns

9 ай бұрын

Right. The Bible doesn't say the age of Jesus when He was crucified. What Luke 3:23 is commonly assumed to state is that Jesus was 30 years old when He began His ministry. But that is not accurate to the original text. It should be translated that Jesus was now like a male of 30 years old. In Jewish culture of the time, Rabbis needed to be at least 30 years old before they could have authority to teach. It does not mean Jesus was actually 30. And based on the information that He was born in 6 BC and started His ministry in 29 AD, He was in His thirties. Check out my video about His ministry for more info.

@Annatar

9 ай бұрын

@@eclipseeventsigns got it. Thanks I'll find the other video you mentioned and check it out.

What Bible translation are you using?

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

Usually the ESV. But always I go back to original language. Hebrew in OT and Aramaic in NT. I use blueletterbible online.

I was just recommended this channel by a friend. Very interesting thoughts. I've not watched your video series fully yet, I'm here following curiosity, but I do wish to be open minded to various scriptural interpretations, and more than happy to go against the grain when it comes to long held so-called "traditions" of Christendom in general for the sake of scriptural truth. I have a question for you in this respect. I wanted to ask you about you claiming Nisan 14 was on a Wednesday in 31.A.D (which is why I assume you say Jesus was in the grave 3 days ending at the Sabbath, to then rise up on the sundown/beginning of the 1st day of the week (Sunday), but according to other traditional luminary based calculations, such as Torah Calender, it claims Nisan 14 was on Tuesday Sunset. This would mean to claim Jesus died in 31 A.D, he would have risen on a Friday, or on a Sabbath (depending on calculation). I assume this is based upon your personal understanding/correction of the Jewish calender? The only other criticism I have, is that Christ told us, nobody knows the day nor hour, not the even the Son, only the Father. So to put a date on Christ's second advent I feel flies in the face of Jesus' instructions and warnings of whom he warned not to listen to if they claim "the end is coming" or "here he is". (Luke 21:8, Mark 13:32).

@eclipseeventsigns

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for giving it open minded consideration. While, yes, it is my personal understanding, it is all very detailed and corroborated by NASA tables, historical documents and original language scripture. You are invited to examine these more fully in my book. But even without the book, all the info is contained in my videos. I wanted to make sure anyone could follow the breadcrumbs - if you want to spend the effort. If I would break it down to the most basic statements - Christian tradition is wrong. The current Jewish calendar is wrong. Only by researching first principles and building up each layer step by step can one truly rediscover the accurate calendar of the Biblical era and find the amazing interconnected pieces that show God planned this all from the start and wants us to discover it as well. We CAN know day and year - but not the hour.

@eclipseeventsigns

Жыл бұрын

You said: "I can appreciate the opinion. Though respectfully, I will disagree and I believe saying "we can know the year, but not the day or hour" is a hyper-literalist approach to his words. The 'principle' I believe of his words should be considered, in that it means nobody knows "when"." Your reply is EXACTLY the reason why I don't usually address the "no one knows the day or the hour". People almost always take that out of context. And here, you have done the exact same thing. A lot of people use that verse to shut people up who look into these matters. Now, granted, there is a lot of kooky stuff that is out there. But there is Truth and there is a proper way to look at this subject. However, people are always scared of the "no one knows the day or the hour" bullies. One has to be willing to go against tradition and the crowd. It takes a very special mindset to even be willing to do that. Second, God Himself is the original date setter. Are you going to shut Him up as well? The Bible is full of examples where He gave exact dates and times. He put it in the motions of the sun, moon and Earth (eclipses). It can be known - with a proper understanding of His proper calendar. And that is what I have sought to present. And it's not my personal revelation. Every single piece can be checked for yourself. When you do, and many people have verified my information, it will blow your mind.

@ProselyteofYah

Жыл бұрын

@@eclipseeventsigns You misunderstand, I don't judge you, or bully you. I only share an opinion, and I'm just very wary and do not wish to fall into presumptuousness either way. You claim I take the verse out of context, but that is... your opinion, just as you can say it's mine. I was raised by a cult that kept setting dates for the end times, and constantly used this as their so-called acclaimed authority for totalitarian rulership over the church. Throughout history, as you have said well enough, there have been kooks out there, and date setting, at least by men, has never turned out well. And concerning it's a warning from our Lord, I would expect 'anyone' to be cautious and take his words seriously. Of course, God is a date setter, I agree. It's only whether men are able to figure out his dates or not is the question. It's interesting to say the least, but I'm uncertain on these "gaps" you're presenting in Daniel's 70 weeks, as many people speak of gaps, but never seem to give adequate scriptural proof for these arbitrary gaps they insert into the 70 weeks.

@eclipseeventsigns

Жыл бұрын

@@ProselyteofYah There's lots to respond to in your comment. It's a very common response. First, I do not fall into the trap of the modern Bible study mantra - "so what does this verse mean to you?". There is no such thing as "your opinion" or "my opinion". God meant what He meant and either you know what it is or you do not. You state Jesus meant "no one knows when". That really is taking those words out of context. The entire point of the passage is Jesus explaining to His disciples ACTUALLY WHEN He was to return. That's the question they asked at the start of the whole discussion. lol. As to people speaking of "gaps" in the 70 weeks - as far as I know, most people consider only 1 gap in the 70 weeks. I present that there are actually 2 gaps. As to being arbitrary - far from it. I go into great detail - there are very clear reasons for each gap to exist and a very mathematical pattern that is at work - each is corroborated with eclipse patterns. So, no, not arbitrary at all. It sounds like you might be like me in that you investigate the various theories out there about end time topics. Some of what led me to my discoveries is the evaluation of the various theories people have had through history. What I realized is that there are demonstrable flaws at the heart of every single theory. The theories based on personal revelation (a "new word" from God) can be thrown out immediately. Some theories rely on the supposed denominational uniqueness (7th Day adventist 1844, etc). and can also be discarded. Some theories rely on the modern Jewish calendar. But the rules for that calendar only came into existence during the 4th century AD. Some theories rely on the wording and punctuation only in the King James Bible as the only inspired version of the Bible. That is just plain ridiculous and goes against God's own words in the Bible itself. When all is said and done, every single theory has a flaw and therefore, is incorrect. My discoveries are unique and do not rely on any other previous theory. They seek to restore a proper understanding of first principles and put together layer by layer facts which can be verified by anyone. And that has been the challenge. Investigate it. Test it. Try and poke holes in it. If there aren't any, then it might just be the proper understanding of these topics.

Having watched all the videos on this series up to this point I can now tell you what I think of it. The basic calendar information you use still relies fully on the dates provided by men for the ocurrence of these specific prophetic fulfillments. Then you take Jeremiah's prophecy of 70 years of the desolations of Jerusalem and include the other nations in that time line to make it begin before God even gave him the prophecy when Jeremiah 29 and Daniel 9 show clearly the 70 years are specific to Jerusalem, but only in the kjv. Let God be true and every man a liar if the dates do not add up as scripture says it should, there is no finagling allowed. The dates have been lost as the book of Jubilee reveals. The first 7 weeks begin when Cyrus decrees God's house be built and sends Ezra and the others to do it. At a certain point they had to stop for a time and then resumed again all within the 49 years. We know this because in the new testament when Jesus tells them to destroy this temple and he would rebuild it in 3 days they said to him that it took 46 years to build that temple. The 62 weeks began with Nehemiah and continued straight through to the baptism of Jesus when the last week began with his ministry of the gospel which was the confirming of the new covenant. He came only to the lost sheep of Israel and he was cutoff in 3 and a half years, but not for himself. The other 3 and a half years of this confirmation was done by the Apostles in Jesus Christ's name through the power of the Holy Ghost with them going only to the Israelites. The last week ended when Peter was sent to the Gentiles in Acts 10. As you quoted Peter that no prophecy of scripture is of private interpretation you failed to realise that what you have done is that very thing and this is why no one has come to this but you, because it is strictly of you which is the meaning of private. Another thing you should know is as you have tried to negate the kjv because it counters your take on these prophecies, it is the only bible that is written in a language that is described in the prophecy of Isaiah 28 as the way God would speak to his people. It also reveals how we are to read these scriptures. Take note and learn from it. You appear to have a humility about you, use it and repent of this error you have created. May God bless you.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

Your comment is a great example of the KJV-onlyists who regard an English translation as somehow supernatural. It is a work by men - and flawed. I've shown exactly how it is not trustworthy in some very important areas. It makes perfect sense why prophecy answers do not come to you because of this assumption.

@followjesusonly1

2 жыл бұрын

@@eclipseeventsigns You negate the word of God because you do not believe that He is not only able to keep His word spiritually intact, but that He would give us a distinct word to study to show ourselves approved. How can anyone keep the word of His patience if He did not keep it? It's further evidence of your lack of understanding God's word by trusting in your own understanding in that the only argument you could make to my comment is regarding which bible I read.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

@@followjesusonly1 Neither the Old nor New Testaments were written in English. God preserved His word perfectly in Hebrew and Aramaic - the original languages. There is no promise that translations are inspired by God. If you don't understand this concept as the base, everything else you wrote is pointless.

@followjesusonly1

2 жыл бұрын

@@eclipseeventsignsAnd yet they both were eventually and it happened to became the dominant language of the world. If that were the base understanding needed then God would not have bothered to tell us that He would speak to us in a different type of language than the languages (Greek included) they were written in. And if anyone could come to the truth of the scriptures in their original languages then Jesus would not have had to tell his disciples that it would be the Holy Spirit is our teacher and would lead us into all truth. Or that His words are Spirit and life. And Paul would not have bothered to let us know that the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. You have neglected the Holy Spirit's guidance in the scriptures because you have been so enthralled with the letter of them and this will not bode well for you. The scriptures are supernatural and as Paul says, 1 Corinthians 2:5-14 That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God. Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought: But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

I'd like to know if you are aware of any scholars that share your viewpoint? Or if there are scholars who have encountered your viewpoint and have produced counter-points? Thanks!

@eclipseeventsigns

Жыл бұрын

I have not come across any other scholars who have these views. I don't know of anyone who has officially critiqued my research either. Believe me I have looked. It's usually not a good thing to have a unique viewpoint. That's why I sat on this information for over a decade before releasing it to the public. I checked and rechecked and rechecked. It's why I continually invite everyone to check for themselves. I include every single source. It's not private interpretation. Everything can be verified. But it does take courage to jettison the comfort of church tradition and the safety of the majority. There can only be one correct interpretation of these topics. And I believe it has now been discovered. There are very specific reasons why I believe this has not been discovered before now.

@ThinkingGodsThoughts

Жыл бұрын

@@eclipseeventsigns What are your credentials, if I might ask.

@eclipseeventsigns

Жыл бұрын

@@ThinkingGodsThoughts When people ask this question, they are usually trying to find a reason to cancel the person. I would counter, what are your credentials in order to make a judgement? Instead, have you spent the time and effort to verify the sources given and made an educated evaluation of the material? Appealing to authority does not guarantee that the supposed expert knows anything more than what any common person could learn on their own. There are a lot of scholars who claim they were experts who got things very wrong. Case in point - Sir Robert Anderson and Bishop Ussher.

@josiahsfriend9708

8 ай бұрын

His credentials are that the Holy Spirit led his teachings...not a cemetary. oh, I mean a seminary.

Did you mean to put 2025 AD and 2032 AD at your last week instead of BC?

@eclipseeventsigns

7 ай бұрын

Yes. Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't see that before.

At 22 minutes in this video, you might want to correct your statement from 230 to 290 weeks of years which is what the video shows.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

Ya, thanks. I noticed that when it was too late to redo the video.

the 1st day was on the 4th day of creation ie Wednesday

@arneedlund8512

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe the millennium paradis start on a wednesday to.

I'm honestly not even really certain after five full videos (with poor quality sound I might add) what it is you're claiming to have "discovered" here. Not trying to be overly critical or contentious but a LOT of KJV only pastors and churches have preached about and known this all along, so that there are gaps in the three sets of weeks is absolutely nothing new. Those believing that there is no gap between the first seven weeks and the sixty two weeks (meaning 69 consecutive weeks) isn't due to some "flaw" in the KJV of the bible as you've asserted. No, instead, like as is the case with so many prophecies and disputes on what the Bible says or doesn't say this is simply an example of the countless variations that people come up with, period. If we were to put aside that single part of your "claim" here and only focus on the other part of your claim, (the future date setting of the final week), then it might make more sense to discuss why other "sources" were necessary to come up with your prediction. Unfortunately, the fact that you have gone out of your way to malign the KJV unnecessarily in order to make your claim, with an accusation of it "causing" people to "believe" things that many Christians don't even believe in the first place, even while putting their full faith and trust in the very KJV you assert is the problem and yet coming to the same conclusion you have anyway somehow, detracts from everything else you have to say as being suspect at best. Sorry, but that's just the truth. There's simply nothing special about your identifying the well known and observed gap that you spent so much time on whether your realize it or not. Maybe you don't know this and maybe that's the answer to the "mystery" for why so many people ignore your claim from the get-go? Not sure, but again, not trying to be overly critical or contentious. I'm just simply pointing out reality. The reality is that very large segments of the KJV only Christian community have long understood these gaps are there and already got that from the KJV of the bible itself long before you ever thought of it.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

Interesting to read your viewpoint. It shows you did not understand at all any of the evidence that is presented. The fact that there are 2 gaps in the 70Weeks prophecy has never been noticed by ANYONE except for me. No one else. And yes, most people base their understanding from the KJV which contains a faulty translation. If you didn't understand that, then you will not appreciate anything else that is discussed. As to poor audio, I suggest you turn up your volume.

@lamar_actual

2 жыл бұрын

@@eclipseeventsigns You sincerely believe that no one else knows and has taught that there are two gaps in the 70 weeks? I just don't even really know how to respond to that. As for not understanding the evidence I apparently understand it well enough to know for a fact that you could have made your final week calculations while using (or even possibly completely omitting) the KJV portion of all of this. Maybe it was necessary for YOUR understanding, but that's kinda the point here. You have blinders on and things you think you "know" for certain are in error. But hey, best of luck to you with your "discovery" though.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

@@lamar_actual If the 2 gaps in the 70 weeks is so well known, please point me to sources that have talked about this. From my research, no has recognized this before. I'd really like to know. I'd change the entire series of videos.

@lamar_actual

2 жыл бұрын

@@eclipseeventsigns Yes, it's well known and has been long debated and discussed. At least among those who know their bibles fairly well. I guess it just all depends on what circles you've been in throughout your life. If you have been in "Baptist" setting then this is certainly well known as it's debated and discussed by those who know their Bibles much in the same way as Pre/Post trib discussions and debates occur. People that tend to only know what the preacher says simply repeat the pre-trib narrative while those who know their bibles much better, but who may exist in fewer numbers, might consider a post trib position as well. As for references this book comes to mind: The Book of Daniel (Cambridge Bible Commentaries on the Old Testament) Published 1976. There's also this example of it being discussed back in 2005 or so. (See pages.6, 33-35) pubhtml5.com/ejtz/nphr/basic I'm sure other examples can be found if you look carefully and require more evidence that this is not your "discovery" although as I mentioned this doesn't take anything away from your personal 70th week prediction. Using other calendars, methods and sources to develop your idea seems just as legit as anyone's' I suppose so that wasn't my point here. I simply point out that you haven't "discovered" this and more importantly that a plain reading of the KJV of the Bible reveals to many what you spent a lot of time setting up unnecessarily. If God didn't want there to be gaps noticed by anyone and simply wanted people to "only" see a contiguous 69 weeks then He could have simply told Daniel 69 weeks instead of having Gabriel describe 3 distinct time periods separated by "and" for the English speaking world. No other translations or sources are necessary to see and comprehend this. Best of luck.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

@@lamar_actual Thanks for the link. This proposal has been well known? I've been in many prophecy circles and his was never given any thought or serious consideration whatsoever. JR Church (the author) lays out his case. But falls extremely flat in multiple areas. He states that the 70Weeks began in 534 BC. As I've shown, that is not according to the prophetic terms that Gabriel used within the prophecy. Church does not recognize the extreme importance of Jeremiah's words which Daniel had been studying and which Gabriel quotes back to him in the 70 weeks prophecy. Church's evidences are quite arbitrary. In addition he dismisses Anderson's proposal within a couple of sentences without even proving why. No, J.R. Church did NOT come up with the solution to the 70 Weeks prophecy. His methods are completely different and not at all similar to what I have discovered quite independent from anyone else in history.

Luke 3:1 Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Tiberius started his rule in14AD That makes it 29 Ad Luke 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, was baptized and started his 3-1/2 year ministry which ended in 32ad which works with your calculations But his birth date doesn’t fit because he was around 33 years of age in 32 ad and your calculation makes him around 39 years old

@arneedlund8512

2 жыл бұрын

?

Daniel 9:24 says, "seventy weeks are determined upon they people", then lists the six things that were to be accomplished in those seventy weeks (490 years). These things were completed (the last being to anoint the most holy, Jesus Christ). There is no mention of any gaps in this prophecy, these gaps are manmade to accommodate a non existent seven year tribulation period.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

As I show through the entire 7 part series, the view that you write is complete fabrication.

@sidrojoe

2 жыл бұрын

@@eclipseeventsigns You're simply following in the footsteps of Clarence Larkin, John Darby, John Walvoord, with their Dispensationalist schemes. The seventy week prophecy of Daniel ended with the stoning of Stephen, then the Kingdom was taken from Israel, and given to a nation (Gentiles) "who would bring forth the fruits thereof" Matt. 21:43.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

@@sidrojoe I know those people you list. But this is all my own research. No one has else has found how Daniel 9 should be interpreted - until now. Replacement theology as you believe is from the pit of hell. It is not Biblical.

@josiahsfriend9708

8 ай бұрын

​​@@sidrojoebe careful listening to man. study with esword. definitions tell the true story. This video makes sense.

I have been telling ppl for years that the feasts are high sabbaths and that seeing as Gen 1 tells us there was night and morning the 1st day, that the day begins at sundown thus He was in the ground Wed thru Fri nites and Thu thru Sat days, and once sundown Sat arrived it became the 1st day of the week and I don't think He waited til what we think of as sometime Sunday morn to rise

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

I go through all of this extensively in my videos.

@fanamarsha2999

2 жыл бұрын

@@eclipseeventsigns m

The very core cannot be challenged and that is when Israel became a nation in 1948. (The fig tree generatiob) So there is no way it cannot be past May 14th, 2022.

@eclipseeventsigns

2 жыл бұрын

I guess we'll see in a month. Hope to see you comment on May 15th, 2022.