Пікірлер

• 
  @chrisschmauch11 сағат бұрын

  The best thing about this software that you didn’t mention is the fact that everything happens locally on your machine, no need to upload your photos after a shoot to get edited in a server somewhere. No Wi-Fi necessary either.

• 
  @DonEvans112 сағат бұрын

  Also ran into the DNG Converter update issue... unfortunately, I had to go through the process of the edits for an 8,000 photo album twice... then contacted support and was told to update the DNG Converter... then, went back and saw there was an update available to train my profile on the new exposure and white balance (merely 4 hours after I had downloaded and installed the new software)... I'm afraid that whatever time I save by using this will wind up getting eaten by trying to get the software to work... Do I see the benefit, yes. Do I like that there's a 30-day trial, yes.. but this could be done much more smoothly IMO.

• 
  @maximumsoftness746913 сағат бұрын

  This is an old, and bad take.

• 
  @ravindra737715 сағат бұрын

  Not another subcription. Hate it. I want to own the software with payment

• 
  @d1m1815 сағат бұрын

  Very sad - it ONLY WORKS FOR PORTRAIT PHOTOS

• 
  @captaincook628317 сағат бұрын

  I really like this kind of tutorial where you show us detailed how you plan this kind of shoot, and I am super impressed that you even tell us the flaws that you had in the shoot that gives us so much possibility to learn from you - I appreciate it!

• 
  @gohumberto17 сағат бұрын

  What effect does printing have on resolution? Squirting wet ink onto absorbent paper must surely reduce the sharpness of an individual pixel (in a good way actually).

• 
  @4GuitarTrance18 сағат бұрын

  I have a serious quandary! I was originally a Windows user, tried a friend's Mac for a few days, and immediately purchased a Mac. Left Windows behind except a PC for occasional gaming, and after YEARS I still love the Mac OS. I mean absolutely LOVE the Mac OS. Problem? I HATE Apple because their hardware gets worse all of the time. The M1, 2, 3 etc. processors (ARM) are amazing. Yet Apple's greed has led them to solder everything to the motherboard, the NAND is on the SSD so if your SSD goes bad, you must trash your Mac and buy a new one because the SSD is not replaceable, the memory is not replaceable or upgradeable, the graphics and CPU are soldered to the motherboard, so basically you have one hell of an overly-expensive paper weight if ANYTHING goes bad on your Mac. I could go on about the maddening BS Apple gets away with when it comes to their actual hardware. After more years than I care to remember, I have come to the conclusion that APPLE SUCKS, especially since Steve Jobs passed away... and it's getting worse. Apple execs are so f@ckin' rich and apparently out-of-touch with those "beneath them" they apparently "feel" everyone can just simply toss perfectly good hardware in the garbage if something goes wrong, and purchase new Macs... just like that. Apple is so out of touch and their heads so far up their rears, well, of course they cannot see what their exorbitant and crappy hardware schemes do to loyal customers, nor do they even [apparently] care. So basically, I love the Mac OS and HATE Windows in comparison... but I love having a choice of what hardware I want (I build PC's when needed), but I HATE Apple hardware, and I hate Apple itself and the crappy tech bus they seem to cruise around on since Mr. Jobs' passing. I was an absolute Apple afficionado until Tim Cook and company started reverting back to their idiotic pre-Jobs ways. After all, they almost ran themselves out of business in the mid- nineties because of the proprietary hardware scheme they seem to be rapidly returning to from those near-fateful days. I wish MS would get a few HUGE Mac OS clues... logical and functional behaviors the Mac OS has natively that should be inherent in any modern OS... functionality the Mac OS has had for probably 20 years now. And/or I wish Apple would at least allow their customers to replace and/or increase crucial items such as memory, drives, etc.... like PC's have allowed for MORE THAN 20 years! Sorry for the rant... seriously sorry! But I am at one hell of a serious impasse at this time. So, I agree with this channel's OP about Windows, but I completely disagree with his enthusiasm for Apple hardware. Again... SORRY for the rant!

• 
  @alexanderchua19 сағат бұрын

  I once used 2 sets of Rode Wireless Pro and I didnt know at first that the venue has a high traffic wifi zone. Drove me crazy. First issue before the start of recording, the transmitters were sending signals in different receivers. Second issue, both transmitters started sending signals in right and different receivers (1 tx of set 1 was sending to rx set 1 and the other tx of set 1 sending to a different rx), third issue during the start of event was signals were getting constantly cut. Fourth issue was I turned on 32 bit float recording on all tx but the signals were also getting cut. It was a nightmare. All in the 2.4 g wifi bullcrap

• 
  @alexanderchua19 сағат бұрын

  This guy probably havent filmed in a high traffic 2.4 room.

• 
  @ReluctantStallion22 сағат бұрын

  Thanks for the ad.

• 
  @dawsonschamberКүн бұрын

  Absolutely insane this is awesome

• 
  @RicardoAndres24Күн бұрын

  The recorded files do not show up on the rode central app, what have I done wrong?

• 
  @MegaPixel404Күн бұрын

  Use a pc...

• 
  @LILC63Күн бұрын

  What really annoys me is that cannon sells different size cartridges for your printer, the thing is the cartridges are all the exact same dimensions, but they don’t fill the ‘standard’ size with much ink.

• 
  @LeeStewartКүн бұрын

  Windows laptops are garbage! 😂

• 
  @donaldpriebschКүн бұрын

  But it`s black! 🥺

• 
  @wernerdesmet8672Күн бұрын

  AI terribly sucks. Just my opinion.

• 
  @sakonxКүн бұрын

  I have a Epson printer, with that refill ink system and i printed like 5-9 pages a day for the last 2-3 mounts and i am at like 50% ink remaining.

• 
  @englishfoodie1041Күн бұрын

  i have one of these and the best £200 i have spent, means not lugging my smoke machine with me.

• 
  @ZenoWatsonКүн бұрын

  Brilliant explanation Patrick

• 
  @heinzmuller8831Күн бұрын

  I chose the F4 version from Sony because it is compact and therefore fits my Sony A7Cr wonderfully. In terms of quality, the optics are quite comparable to the 2.8 variant and the macro function is an addition that allows someone who only occasionally does macros to save money on a specialized lens. Together with the Sony F4/20-70 it forms a wonderfully compact and visually appealing combination for all occasions without having to compromise on quality.

• 
  @JashanDeepsingh3Күн бұрын

  Fruitarian diet has helped many others.

• 
  @FStoppersКүн бұрын

  Since posting this video, I’ve had sooo many people reach out to me. The shocking thing…they all have different diets. For some, eating all meat helped put them in remission. For others, cutting broccoli and cauliflower worked. Others removed milk and cheeses. Some like you remove fruit. Overall I can’t seem to find any commonality and it makes me think the mechanism for Crohn’s disease isn’t a single thing but rather the name is an umbrella term for a lot of different diseases that cause a similar response. Thanks for sharing! -P

• 
  @unknown-dustin2806Күн бұрын

  you can turn tht cartridges to be an CISS or just inject some universal ink in them if you're rlly on a budget it's frickin cheap yet it's hard to maintain whahhaha

• 
  @aftershootКүн бұрын

  Thank you for this tutorial, Fstoppers! 💜 We are so excited to be the best personal assistant to any photographer that wants to have more time shooting rather than staying behind a desk! We have a 30 day free trial - no credit card needed - so in case anyone wants to try it, we can’t wait to show you it’s magic ✨

• 
  @FranciscoAlvarezTVКүн бұрын

  Thanks for reviewing, Lee. I’m here to answer any questions!

• 
  @VictorBStanКүн бұрын

  2 tram shot with pink lad is try-hard 2/5

• 
  @szeinnerКүн бұрын

  Does the software do any type of skin retouching?

• 
  @paul-green-photographyКүн бұрын

  You were testing print resolution here. NOT sensor resolution. And I bet all of the prints actually had the same print resolution.

• 
  @BritishRosie-es3zrКүн бұрын

  Back in 2005 I was printing Canon 1Ds II images at 16mp onto huge canvases for weddings. They still look amazing now, yet non-photography people with cameras complain that 24mp is not enough.

• 
  @salatКүн бұрын

  9:55 "If you do decide to buy" - you mean "subscribe" - thanks, but no thanks!

• 
  @vedranjanic6998Күн бұрын

  Unfortunately... Overrated lightroom presets on semi auto...

• 
  @gludeklisКүн бұрын

  How does this work with interior/real estate photography? Are the results fairly decent?

• 
  @77drisКүн бұрын

  I got my hands on the 20 MP R6 and 45 MP R5 and upscaled the R6 files to match the R5 (you can pick MP output in Adobe Camera Raw). I then layered the files on top of each other without labelling them. My friend and I have about 35 years of photo/PS experience and even when zoomed in to 100% on 5K monitors, we often couldn't tell which was which. Our hit rate was about 50%. Then I used the Adobe built in Superscale feature to upscale the R6 files and then downsample them to match the 45 MP of the R5 and repeated the above. We picked the R6 files as sharper and more detailed 90% of the time. This was in portrait, studio and landscape photos using the best RF primes. Finally we did the same but used a free AI upscale on the R6 files, then downsampled to 45 MP and repeated the above. 100% of the time we picked the R6 files as sharper and more detailed. MP is truly overrated at this point. I think on full frame 35mm sensors that we have reached a near saturation point. I've also had billboards made from 8 MP 1D2N files that looked amazing! Because of this I got the R6 II (24 MP) instead of the R5 and got better AF, and other newer features and used the $2000 I saved on a 70-200 lens. The lens and AF accuracy makes a bigger difference than the MP ultimately. A 24 MP cam with a great lens and perfect AF will match or beat a 45 MP cam with a good lens and maybe slightly off AF. And even when all things are perfect for both the difference in real world (prints, etc) is not noticable anymore. And the same applies to cropping (as you can blow up the smaller files then crop though I never crop).

• 
  @KlausSNКүн бұрын

  Impressed with the culling but not impressed with the editing. (in this video) Seems that presets will do just as good.

• 
  @nerdnamКүн бұрын

  I wish there was a camera like a box with just a full touchscreen on back. Like a point and shoot with no viewfinder. But if you put it up to your eye a viewfinder will appear in the touchscreen,

• 
  @stevesvidsКүн бұрын

  Lots of additional technical comments here. A complex subject that I feel can be expanded on in future videos. Best use of higher MP in camera is the ability to heavy crop part of the image without loss of definition / sharpness. When you next open a large mp photo view it at 100% and scroll around the entire periphery of the image. You'll realise how insanely massive your photo is even if it is printed at 300dpi. Now of you were to half the dpi your print has the potential to be twice as big again and will look good at nose close. Now go twice as big again and it will look good at 8 feet away. All quite ridiculous for your average shooter who in reality had more than enough pixels with their 20 year old dslr 8mp.

• 
  @robertruffo2134Күн бұрын

  And yet... Photographers with a good eye continue to make money, and will continue to. My neighbor comfortably pays off his 1.5 million loft with fashion photography.

• 
  @sunlbxКүн бұрын

  yeah you can't make AI make a photo of "this model who is not very famous" wearing "this dress we got tailored yesterday"

• 
  @robertruffo2134Күн бұрын

  @@sunlbx I think you don't realize how the business actually works. You are bitter also.

• 
  @sunlbxКүн бұрын

  @@robertruffo2134 you are bitter that everyone is bitter and everyone seems bitter. i make six figures doing my home office job and photograph for fun as a hobby enjoying every moment. HOWEVER I also feel bad for the button-pressers losing their jobs. Creative photographers with creative vision will find ways to make money. The button-pressers will fade away. fashion photographers still have the money because ai cannot be asked to produce certain things it has not been taught to. it cannot produce a photo of something designed yesterday for the first time, which was my point. you found bitterness there. Please work through your issues and life will become better.

• 
  @robertruffo2134Күн бұрын

  @@sunlbx I misunderstood your take. My apologies. That said, you are admitting you are a hobbyist, and yet feel you know how the photo business works, and even can predict its future. "Button pushers" have been out of business since the launch of the iPhone, maybe even since the launch of any digital camera.

• 
  @michaelzero5144Күн бұрын

  This software is useless when no one hires photographers. Kidding as only event photographers or live events will survive AI

• 
  @ZoranImsiragicКүн бұрын

  You look print, not pixels. In print, you see dots. Dots are a so-called halftone screen. And it is measured in lines per inch. How many lines are enough to see a clear image from one foot distance? 150 lpi. Lpi × 2 = resolution. 150 × 2 = 300ppi. It is an old formula.

• 
  @patrikfloding79852 күн бұрын

  At least it doesn’t do a fake composite “best take”…

• 
  @davimathesonКүн бұрын

  is there any software that does this yet?

• 
  @youritguy12 күн бұрын

  So I’m surprised you didn’t mention about the pricing structure. For this program, you pay monthly or yearly and it’s another subscription service. I mean, it has very interesting capabilities, but it’s another subscription service.

• 
  @andrewf.7813Күн бұрын

  Subscriptions suck…big time.

• 
  @TheFireRedКүн бұрын

  You shouldn’t be surprised. Guy gets a commission for each sale.

• 
  @uncle0ericКүн бұрын

  Unfortunately, the subscription model is probably here to stay. :(

• 
  @FranciscoAlvarezTVКүн бұрын

  As opposed to what? Paying per image? 😅

• 
  @stew.cКүн бұрын

  I’d preferred to buy/own the software. Another subscription would suck!

• 
  @MichaelHalsell2 күн бұрын

  Useful features on this update. Thanks for the tour.

• 
  @deadreckoningoutdoors2 күн бұрын

  How does it do on sports can it tell if a baseball is in the picture or not.

• 
  @rst1082 күн бұрын

  or you can use ND filter.

• 
  @DJBooks12 күн бұрын

  No prices mentioned nor the fact that this tier of editing is almost $500/year. At least you can pay yearly. I'm talking to you Lumimar Neo.

• 
  @HaggenKennedy2 күн бұрын

  $500/year if you have one device. If you're like me, and use a desktop and a notebook, the price goes up to $720/year.

• 
  @MarioScott2 күн бұрын

  Because this is for people making money in photography

• 
  @HarshitDwivedi_daggerКүн бұрын

  @@HaggenKennedy I believe you only need the 720$ plan if you want to use it on 2 machines simultaneously. If you don’t intend to use it on your laptop and desktop at the same time; the 240$ or the 480$ plan will work for you!

• 
  @shzammpatapon9865Күн бұрын

  honestly, this is the first reliable batch editing that I've ever seen. I shoot so many events in a year, this saves me weeks of editing. fucking worth it. only if you are paid to do so.

• 
  @gillesmatheronpro2 күн бұрын

  May I remind a nice and clever functionality of the DJI Mic 2, that eliminates the need for using wired capsules with screw-on type jack connectors...? The moving part of the transmitter clip has a small groove hidden inside. This is to grip the cable after doing a loop. This combination acts like a safety against unplugging + a safety against traction on the cable itself. And there... no problems of compatibility (or lack of), because you don't care about locking-ring size and else : you can plug any type of 3.5 mm jack connector and still have it safely in place for your whole filming. DJI was more clever than many think they are ! 😇

• 
  @paulchoccyt13032 күн бұрын

  Feel sorry for the model, you dont even tag their IG etc

• 
  @FStoppers2 күн бұрын

  It’s in the video -P

• 
  @MrMonkeyMana2 күн бұрын

  I've been doing this since the C1. Still running strong. 48 inch C1 OLED on a desk witj a standing desk on top works well.

• 
  @MrMonkeyMana2 күн бұрын

  Also you don't have to sit in the middle of the screen. I usually sit slightly to the left so it feels more like 2 displays during split screen use.

• 
  @matepesti86062 күн бұрын

  If you have ever cropped a photo you must have noticed.