Пікірлер

• 
  @ICONFESSONEBAPTISM7 күн бұрын

  >Latin Rite Catholic Literally who cares what this person thinks

• 
  @ayejay44779 күн бұрын

  well, I spoke to you a while back and you didn't follow through with the debate with us. You're wasting you're time with Micheal lofton and the others, they're not catholics but romanists, pseudo-catholics, they don't understand the dogma of Rome the highest See and apply "infallibility " only to the roman see, not knowing that other bishops and popes may speak infallibly, hence we call them romanists, and hence why they can't debate to defend their heretical AntiPopes and rape idolatrous cult. That's why I told you to elaborate your position to me as I explained to you the 896 A.C. sede vacante and the 11th century great apostasy in which all sees have been vacant, from Rome to Constantinople, Rome was the last to fall after Constantinople. But I don't know what happened you dissapeared on me.

• 
  @ayejay44779 күн бұрын

  And no, a latter Roman Pope, which you would have as believe was Pope John, cannot overturn an infallibly ratified synod, especially not the one where the eastern orthodox bishops were present [not to be confused with your heretical apostate eastern unorthodox greek and russian sects]. According to your logic, the first great synod of Nicaea may be overturned. Both the roman pope and the eastern popes have infallibility but the final decision and infallible judgment belongs to the Highest See [not to be confused with the pseudo-catholic romanist sects today]

• 
  @ayejay44779 күн бұрын

  also, before you debate, get your homework ready, because you're going to have to render an account for your own apostasies, like the abandonment of the apostolic sacrament of public penance and 1 strike policy for your invalid sacrament of confession in a box where criminals are invalidly absolved over and over again; and "baptism of desire"; and "limbo"; and idolatry; and much more.

• 
  @ubipetrus38828 күн бұрын

  <<well, I spoke to you a while back and you didn't follow through with the debate with us.>> I vaguely recall someone, maybe it was you, wanting to debate the Sedevacantist position and my response was that the modern Sede movement is outside of my wheelhouse but I'd be willing to debate the OC vs. RC views of the papacy. Can you email me a screenshot and a link to where I had supposedly ghosted you? [email protected].

• 
  @ayejay44778 күн бұрын

  @ubipetrus3882 I appreciate you clarifying the matter. We most likely can not debate then, as I'm totally against the mainstream romanist pseudo-papacy and will never defend it as the catholic point of view, though i regard myself as orthodox and catholic, titles which are inseperable. Not many know about the 896 sede vacante and the 10th century dark age, where no one could work out who was the last Roman Pope. So yeah I wouldn't expect the romanists to understand our debate if we were to debate, and I won't be defending them, for the Roman highest see dogma is inseperable from the dogma of infallibility in eastern popes and bishops and general and local synods, which the romanist "papacy" rejects. I can't show you an image or screenshot of you "ghosting me" as it's been a while. But for all i know, maybe you did reply and I can't see it, it's been way too long. All good, thanks for your honesty.

• 
  @ayejay44774 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 why did you delete my comment

• 
  @PerseusPBear9 күн бұрын

  Ubi, what happened to one of my replies? It was a comment roasting lofton for showing up here with an alt and complaining.

• 
  @ubipetrus38828 күн бұрын

  I don't know, I don't delete comments unless they're obviously spam and I don't see it in the "held for review" tab in YT studio.

• 
  @Lupen696 күн бұрын

  Seems youtube sometimes deletes comments, for whatever reason :/

• 
  @ubipetrus38825 күн бұрын

  Whenever that happens, and more than a few people have mentioned that their comments disappear, just repost the comment shortly thereafter and see what happens. Most time I log into the YT account, I check YT studio and release the "held for review" comments (they usually contain links) that aren't spam and aren't grotesque/graphic.

• 
  @Gio-ce8ob10 күн бұрын

  So you’re trying to defend being allowed to remarry three times but I watched nearly all of your video and nearly all the quotes say the same thing, after one marriage stay single. So how does that help your case?

• 
  @ubipetrus38829 күн бұрын

  I don't think you watched the video: can you time-stamp three quotations that say the man must remain single after a divorce?

• 
  @Gio-ce8ob10 күн бұрын

  Whenever someone starts out trying to qualify disagreeing with a quote by saying “now at first glance…” 😂 excuses, excuses. Three times and Jesus says once. Nice excuses for not following the law though 👍🏻

• 
  @ubipetrus38829 күн бұрын

  Can you provide an argument explaining why quote X at time-stamp Y actually says Z and explain why my argument fails?

• 
  @Gio-ce8ob11 күн бұрын

  All due respect, you didn’t refute anything on disunity due to a lack of a Magisterium. Essentially, from your perspective each area is responsible for it’s own dogma. You didn’t list any centralized authority that all could appeal to. You said that local synods could possibly come up with a local agreement. That is all well and good but there is no central beliefs on many things. Like rebaptism (often occurring in Orthodoxy), some believe in Toll Houses, some don’t etc. in addition, I read and watch Orthodox sources all the time and the Council of 2016 is often an example of the disunity that can result. Four Patriarchs didn’t attend and many didn’t acknowledge it as authoritative, so what did it accomplish? Antioch is in schism with Jerusalem, Moscow in schism with Constantinople, not to mention the mess with Ukraine. Protestantism fails bc everyone is essentially their own Pope, I think orthodoxy suffers from a similar problem in that each Patriarch (or even Bishop) is essentially a Pope and that creates almost as many problems. How can anyone solve anything if they won’t even meet to have an ecumenical council? It results in what happened in 2016, recognized by some but not by others. I’m not saying the Papacy is perfect either but I can see how that system is more efficient.

• 
  @ubipetrus388210 күн бұрын

  <<Essentially, from your perspective each area is responsible for it’s own dogma.>> You'll need to timestamp where I supposedly made the claim that each area is responsible for its own dogma (i.e. could formulate dogma on its own). <<You didn’t list any centralized authority that all could appeal to. You said that local synods could possibly come up with a local agreement.>> Again, you'll need to timestamp what you are referring to with local synods making a local agreement. <<That is all well and good but there is no central beliefs on many things. Like rebaptism (often occurring in Orthodoxy), some believe in Toll Houses, some don’t etc.>> Can you cite an official document from an autocephalous Church that states converts from RC and Protestant backgrounds are to be rebaptized? <<in addition, I read and watch Orthodox sources all the time and the Council of 2016 is often an example of the disunity that can result. Four Patriarchs didn’t attend and many didn’t acknowledge it as authoritative, so what did it accomplish?>> How familiar are you with the reception of the 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th ecumenical councils? <<Antioch is in schism with Jerusalem,>> No, they are not. <<Moscow in schism with Constantinople, not to mention the mess with Ukraine.>> For the time being. Such schisms were failrly normal in the first millennium. <<Protestantism fails bc everyone is essentially their own Pope, I think orthodoxy suffers from a similar problem in that each Patriarch (or even Bishop) is essentially a Pope and that creates almost as many problems.>> So you think that each patriarch has universal, ordinary, and immediate jurisdiction in their own patriarchate and can speak infallibly? <<How can anyone solve anything if they won’t even meet to have an ecumenical council?>> Why, especially now, do we need to physically meet in order to make agreements? Can't we just state our assent to a document? Honest question.

• 
  @EasternChristian33312 күн бұрын

  I am too dumb for this conversation. How many times must Christian say principle which, by which, to make a point? I cant follow his speaking at all... So fanboys on both sides, dont respond. I want neutral parties to weigh in. Who made the stronger argument here and why?

• 
  @miguelalvarado631412 күн бұрын

  It is funny that Ubi makes a video about someone not wanting to debate him, but he refuses to debate William Albrecht.... Sitll waiting.

• 
  @ubipetrus388212 күн бұрын

  What's your evidence it isn't William refusing and evading? Last I heard, after refusing a moderator and then suddenly agreeing to a moderator (and then claiming his mother was in the hospital so he couldn't discuss despite him replying to emails almost immediately) he is refusing a moderator. It's hard to keep track because he's all over the place and doesn't seem to think he's held to the standards of what he just agreed to even an hour before. That being said, whenever he wants a moderated debate on a third party channel, we can enter back into a discussion on that - IIRC, Militant Thomist said he would host it on his channel and moderate. I recently reached out to Albrecht's friend James (the one with a newspaper on his head) and that was an exercise in futility: he refused a one on one moderated debate in a typical intro, rebuttal, cross examination, closing model claiming it would favor me (yes, Ubi) and demanded it be a two on two debate. I countered that we could do him and Albrecht against me and he refused and that is where it ended. With RC apologists, they typically look for any reason to avoid debating even going so far as for loopholes once they've (often times accidentally) agreed to it but they still try to talk like they're tough and ready to hit the mattresses.

• 
  @miguelalvarado631411 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 That is funny (not attacking you personally) I find it funny because William has said multiple times on his channel that you refuse to debate him for any reason. I dont know who is lying, but someone is.. Just hope ya´ll can get it done, I am debating between Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy at this very moment.

• 
  @ubipetrus388210 күн бұрын

  @@miguelalvarado6314 What if I sent you the chain of emails?

• 
  @miguelalvarado63149 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 I believe you.

• 
  @ayejay44779 күн бұрын

  William Albrech is the one who flees debates. Plus he shouldn't be debating anyone on anything, as he belongs to a child rape idolatrous pseudo-catholic sect that set up idols and desecrated churches for over 1000 years now, and taught many new heresies

• 
  @SolidSnake013 күн бұрын

  Yeah they banned me from the comments because I corrected them politely. What does that tell you? Even they know they're not honest.

• 
  @ubipetrus388213 күн бұрын

  Considering each comment plays the algorithm in the video poster's favor and considering some comments then garner even more comments, which often times erupt into arguments that run dozens of comments long, each of those comments in turn playing the algorithm, banning commentators whom you disagree with is a poor method for getting your videos out there. If he allowed debate in the comments section, he'd probably have more people tuning in simply to respond to comments and his channel would then be somewhat of a semblance of what he apparently wanted it to become: a center for debate and discussion. For the record, I (Ubi) rarely ban anyone, though other mods might.

• 
  @SolidSnake012 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 exactly. Like, I'm good bro, you're messing up your own engagement. But tbh thy kinda have to do that, because everytime they make one of those weird Thomist arguments, it's so easily disproven. That's why they never want to quote any authoritative texts when they talk about Orthodox positions. It's always, "well some random 'Orthodox' guy said this so that's their position. Could you imagine if anyone did that to them? They'd lose it lol. Like if someone said, "Roman Catholics don't even know if communion is real, it's true, I heard a few say it isn't so that must be their position." Imagine their response lol. But yet that's how they always do us

• 
  @ubipetrus388212 күн бұрын

  @@SolidSnake0 << Could you imagine if anyone did that to them?>> I know exactly what they would do because they do it regularly: they simply assert that there is no objective authority outside of the RCC that can be appealed to and because of that, they are completely justified in citing random bishops but others aren't justified in citing random RC bishops. Once you break down their assertion and show that other communions, such as the OC have a universal magisterium, that can't "sum random Orthodoxes done did say this and sum random Orthodoxes done did say that" and much of their apologetic just falls apart. There are a few reasons why they do that, primarily their main selling point on the RCC is clarity of dogma - if you can sell that, you don't necessarily need to prove the dogmas correct, just that they are clear.

• 
  @Hope_Boat13 күн бұрын

  Lord have mercy on us all sinners. Kyrie eleison ☦️

• 
  @glitchyrhythm674914 күн бұрын

  ☦️

• 
  @j.g.494214 күн бұрын

  At 20:00 ish, what's ragingly heretical about Luther's small catechism (which was written for children)? Is it just the Filioque and old german translation of 'Katholikos to christian' contained in the creed? Or that the Holy Spirit makes Christians holy? Or in Private Confession the Christian should confess only those sins that they know about and worry them? Or is it the large catechism that's ragingly heretical, the sermons series through the small catechism aimed at the parents? That the lazy and arrogant neglect the 10 Commandments, Creed, Lord's Prayer, Baptism, Holy Communion, Private Confession? Or that anything of creation can become an idol/god for the one who worships it beside or before God Almighty?

• 
  @michaelspeyrer126414 күн бұрын

  He has ten times more subscribers than you? How is the at low tier, and he’s a PHD candidate. Do you have either of these? If he is low there what does that make you dummy?

• 
  @Thunderjerky13 күн бұрын

  So true, being a PhD candidate means you're better and smarter than everyone else. That's why I only read Michael Foucault, he has a PhD after all! And so true again, more subscribers = truth. Thank goodness you opened our eyes!

• 
  @ubipetrus388213 күн бұрын

  Greetings, Michael Spreyrer. Would you tell us how many subs, views, and videos he has and we can then do the math to scale?

• 
  @matthewschmidt506914 күн бұрын

  Read Answering Orthodoxy friends as the East continues to go astray with a woman deacon and allowances for contraceptions.

• 
  @Thunderjerky13 күн бұрын

  That book is garbage and not worth the paper it's printed on - Papacy by Ybarra is much better than that crap lol

• 
  @ubipetrus388213 күн бұрын

  Thunderjerky, having read both books, I concur 100%. Despite Ybarra's book often times being simplistic thinking dressed up in quote mines, Lofton's book is essentially the coloring book and crayons version of Ybarra's book.

• 
  @matthewschmidt506912 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 Can you refute your woman deacon or deficient view on contraception?

• 
  @ubipetrus388212 күн бұрын

  @@matthewschmidt5069 1) There's nothing to defend there as it's not a licit ordination since she's below canonical age and married. My guess is that for the sake of saving face, she will be quietly be pushed out of orders but Africa is a fairly disfunctional missionary field. There's a reason that could happen there and not in the US, Russia, Greece, etc. 2) We have a video on contraception. Can you refute that video?

• 
  @matthewschmidt506911 күн бұрын

  @ubipetrus3882 ah very interesting, so you don't think the ordinations will continue? I am sure they will, give it time like the other groups that broke from Rome (Anglicans, Lutherans, etc)

• 
  @Trandofir14 күн бұрын

  Makes me wonder if Lofton read Jerusalem 1672 when he was binge watching The Office US again.

• 
  @robertilie62714 күн бұрын

  That bottle of beer is Stella Artois

• 
  @vrocs322515 күн бұрын

  this voice modifier sounds pretty bad, raspy and hard to understand

• 
  @tynytian15 күн бұрын

  Lofton makes the same lame argument that muslims use. They cite some random "christian" who, for example, rejects the trinity (Arianism), then pretends like that proves christians have no consensus. Who cares what one dude believes? Deal with the official position of the church.

• 
  @michaelspeyrer126414 күн бұрын

  Yeah I’m with you screw that Apostolic teaching .

• 
  @larryjake778311 күн бұрын

  ​@@michaelspeyrer1264 Mr. Lofton I believe you misunderstood their point and comment

• 
  @biddyearly926215 күн бұрын

  Mic-hael Lofto-n supports the geno-c-ide of the Pa-les-tinian people.

• 
  @biddyearly926215 күн бұрын

  Why do you call yourself after Peter who made his bishopship in Rome? You are Orthodox.

• 
  @basilmakedon15 күн бұрын

  Rome was Orthodox for 1000 years before they split

• 
  @biddyearly926215 күн бұрын

  @@basilmakedon I am aware of the schism that happened but the op has a painting of Peter with the papal tiara. Orthodox I think believe Peter is the first among equals but not the final authority.

• 
  @sihtnaelkk218715 күн бұрын

  ​@@biddyearly9262 Peter has an important place in Orthodoxy. No matter if others have taken advantage of some facts of his life It's like saying you can't venerate St. Andrew as a Catholic since he founded the Church of Constantinople

• 
  @johnnyd23839 күн бұрын

  St. Peter established sees of Antioch and Alexandria prior to ever going to Rome. According to the Pope St. Gregory the Great: "Since then it is the SEE OF ONE, and ONE SEE, over which by Divine authority THREE BISHOPS NOW PRESIDE". So, in reality, Rome can claim 1/3 of the Petrine legacy only, while 2/3 are in the hands of the Eastern Orthodox.

• 
  @precisi0n8615 күн бұрын

  Lofton would get demolished by you ubi, whatever the topic, and so it wouldn’t be a fair representation of Catholicism vs orthodoxy. I wish you could debate someone a little more scholarly and authoritative like a catholic bishop. Maybe someone like bishop Barron.

• 
  @acekoala45714 күн бұрын

  Barron has already given up the position of Ecclesiastical Exclusivity by saying we have Christ in our(The Orthodox) Eucharist.

• 
  @michaelspeyrer126414 күн бұрын

  I’m sorry but you are incorrect.

• 
  @michaelspeyrer126414 күн бұрын

  He’s a PHD candidate of that isn’t scholarly enough for you, you don’t understand the meaning of the word. What it really seems you want is someone with a big enough name to plate your ego.

• 
  @precisi0n8614 күн бұрын

  @@michaelspeyrer1264 As someone who holds a PhD I can tell you that a PhD candidate isn’t a scholar, but a potential future one. They are there to learn how to be a scholar and contribute something original in their field of study. Ubi’s a smart guy, to do this topic justice he needs someone who is as knowledgeable as him and who is good at arguing. Lofton is simply not in the same league. A debate between Ubi and Lofton would not be balanced, and I don’t think I’d want to listen to it.

• 
  @precisi0n8613 күн бұрын

  @@michaelspeyrer1264 Nice argument…

• 
  @Patrickseventyfour15 күн бұрын

  Slides 15-21 - basically, the pope's infallibility in context is that it won't go sideways because the pope is infallible.

• 
  @acekoala45715 күн бұрын

  Lofton brings up Jerusalem 1672 like he's read it. But it also Anathematizes the Immaculate Conception. Which he ignores this fact.

• 
  @michaelspeyrer126414 күн бұрын

  Synods aren’t dogmatically binding.

• 
  @ubipetrus388214 күн бұрын

  @@michaelspeyrer1264 Anything accepted by all of the patriarchal synods is binding. We cover that not only in this series responding to Lofton but also in the response to MHFM and in two articles entitled "What Makes a Council Ecumenical?" Parts 1 and 2.

• 
  @grizzly_891713 күн бұрын

  ​@@michaelspeyrer1264Lofton running interference on an alt lmao.

• 
  @acekoala45713 күн бұрын

  @@michaelspeyrer1264 This is a slippery slope. Especially since the main arguments for pre-Lyons Filioque come from Local Synods, not Ecumenical Councils

• 
  @ayejay44779 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 so are you saying that there was popes/patriarchs at the synods of carthage and elvira?

• 
  @kevrla15 күн бұрын

  Mr. Lofton seems to be making up his own version of Orthodoxy. He doesn’t know what he is talking about and embarrasses himself with his views.

• 
  @michaelspeyrer126414 күн бұрын

  Yeah I’f you mean he cases his theology on the documents of the Church in stead of a self serving theology Orrhodoxy makes up as it goes along.

• 
  @Pilgrimontheway13613 күн бұрын

  He likes making up his own version of Catholicism as well

• 
  @BermoodaTriangle11 күн бұрын

  @@michaelspeyrer1264can you retype this? Too many mistakes to sense out of it.

• 
  @ayejay44778 күн бұрын

  @@Pilgrimontheway136 its because he's not catholic, all these youtubers are pseudo-catholics

• 
  @kevinrhatigan565615 күн бұрын

  Where does this obsession with debating come from? Why does it even matter? If a Christian lost a debate against a Muslim would that in itself even mean anything? Go debate Jake the Muslim -so far every orthobro has lost.

• 
  @ubipetrus388215 күн бұрын

  The only debate I have seen between an Orthobro and Jake was with Dr. Beau and I thought Jake did very poorly, especially with how he became noticeably upset at points (this was when it first came out so I would have to rewatch it to provide those time stamps) but I have never been impressed with Islamic apologetics - it's just rinse and repeat style arguments. The importance of debating is you can corner someone and make it clear they cannot answer the objection. To the objection that they may not have enough time, I, I think extremely generously, offer my interlocutors up 300% of my time if that is what it takes them to debate. Question: if debating isn't important, why was Christ so keen to debate the Jewish authorities?

• 
  @rhedrich315 күн бұрын

  ​@ubipetrus3882 What are your thoughts on The Lions Den channel/Oriental Orthodoxy? They make some points I think would be worth engagement from an EO perspective.

• 
  @ubipetrus388215 күн бұрын

  It's easy to ask for videos, but not to make them so to weed out those who are serious from those who are not, I'll present to you the same offer I present everyone with when they ask for responses to videos: 1) Pick the five strongest points you think he makes. 2) Link to the video in which each point is contained followed by exact time stamps showing beginning and end (so, not 'Starts after about five minutes and then just listen to the rest') 3) A summary of what he is saying, why you think it should be answered, and explaining why existing arguments we have in our videos and articles don't address said objections. To anyone who thinks this seems like a lot of work, when I make videos, I listen to as many of their videos as I can (specifically those that are on the topic I want to respond to them on), create a catalogue of quotations with exact time stamps and the links, have their quotations written down verbatim so they can be fit into a script with a short summary of what it says above each, etc.

• 
  @rhedrich315 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 That's fair. I will get back to you.

• 
  @kevinrhatigan565614 күн бұрын

  ​@@ubipetrus3882The interaction between Beau and Jake, was just that, a conversation, it wasn't a debate at all. Debates are misleading - just because your opponent can't answer the objection, it doesn't mean that the objection is unanswerable or that the objection is valid, for that matter. So if a Muslim cornered a Christian apologist on the Trinity (and it's happened) that in itself wouldn't mean anything. Again, would you be willing to debate a top Muslim/Unitarian instead of Catholics all the time? And I don't think Jesus "debated" the Pharisees, not in the modern sense of the term at least. He spoke the Truth to them although I will admit he responded to their objections -albeit in his own particular way.

• 
  @rsissel115 күн бұрын

  Michael Lofton, Popesplainer-in-Chief 1. That did not happen 2. And if it did, it doesn't change anything 3. And if it does, it's no big deal 4. And if it is, it's not the Pope's fault.

• 
  @biddyearly926215 күн бұрын

  In Michaels head he thinks he is part of the inquisition.

• 
  @joshuamkk15 күн бұрын

  lol 100%

• 
  @michaelspeyrer126414 күн бұрын

  You saying naw is not a counter argument.

• 
  @michaelspeyrer126414 күн бұрын

  When one relies on the documents of the Church that contradict you. they don’t have to be.

• 
  @ryrocks948715 күн бұрын

  I appreciate that you put the videos out, but it's still odd that you'd give someone as low tier as Lofton a platform. It seems like someone like Ybarra who actually tries would be more worthy.

• 
  @EasternChristian33315 күн бұрын

  I think because Ybarras content is getting much viewership whereas Loftons sensationalism gets him loads of views and over 100k subscribers.

• 
  @ubipetrus388215 күн бұрын

  @@EasternChristian333 There is definitely that but it's moreso that Lofton's arguments need to be responded to because they are oft repeated by others. I am getting ready to resume the response to Ybarra's book, but I plan on doing it in article format as the level of detail needed is simply too cumbersome for video (as well as narration and video production nearly doubling the time it takes to put content out).

• 
  @ryrocks948714 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 That makes sense; I guess people need to be met at all levels of apologetics. Thanks for what you do.

• 
  @ryrocks948714 күн бұрын

  @@EasternChristian333 That makes a lot of sense; I guess I just didn't even think that there were people who really looked to him for arguments in an honest manner.

• 
  @michaelspeyrer126414 күн бұрын

  “As low tier.” He is a PHD candidate, with tens of thousands of subscribers. What is wrong with you?

• 
  @EasternChristian33315 күн бұрын

  Babe, wake up! Another Ubi video just dropped.

• 
  @ubipetrus388215 күн бұрын

  On that note, I think our regular audience on YT is something like 99% male. The one video that broke that was "The Theology of Marriage in Orthodox Christianity." For the first few months, it was out, it had 8% female viewership. No other video has broken the 1% average for female viewership.

• 
  @EasternChristian33315 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 Women "typically" don't have the same drive for theology that men do. It is a big struggle bringing my wife into Orthodoxy because she doesn't care about theology as much as what the community is like (lots of kids, other women she can befriend, etc). We do need more outreach to appeal to women unfamiliar with Orthodoxy.

• 
  @ubipetrus388215 күн бұрын

  @@EasternChristian333 The outreach to women is (1) the change they see in their husband because of his involvement with the Church and (2) having great communities that she feels a part of (i.e. families and other women whom she can see and connect with outside of services).

• 
  @EasternChristian33315 күн бұрын

  @@ubipetrus3882 I can only blame myself for the first one but the second one is just as difficult to overcome. The Orthodox parish is tiny and the only children that attend are Fathers. Compared to the Uniate parish we have now with dozens of large families and many children. She just doesn't see anything there to convert for, especially since it is Uniate and already seems Orthodox to her. It's a tough hill to climb.

• 
  @EasternRomeOrthodoxy7 күн бұрын

  ​@@ubipetrus3882☦️Ubi Petros, would you please tell me what was the exact year/concil of the Catholic Church in which the pseudo-Athanasian "creed" was dogmatized as a creed?

• 
  @EasternRomeOrthodoxy15 күн бұрын

  ☦️Lofton is no less than a liberal modernist *Modalist* arrogant & ignorant clown son of Satan. I call him the 1st born of Sabellianus.

• 
  @christianlacroix543015 күн бұрын

  Catholicism is satanism.

• 
  @Juan-gd1wd15 күн бұрын

  Thank you for your work, Ubi. God Bless 🙏

• 
  @anyavalenty714817 күн бұрын

  Hey Ubi. Hypothetically, If one of the Diamond Brothers challenged you to a debate, would you debate them? This isn't a snipe, theres just a bunch of trads coping saying that Peter Diamond would smash you in a debate, even when you released a debate challenge in your video. Im just asking if that debate challenge is still up

• 
  @eddardgreybeard25 күн бұрын

  I honestly think the Orthodox explanation that the holy spirit proceeded energetically from Christ but in essence from the Father is a very legit explanation, also backed up by scripture, namely in John 14. Christ stated himself he would have the Father send the holy spirit in his name.

• 
  @frankpontone213928 күн бұрын

  Ubi Petrus, do you really believe in all of the dogmas of Eastern Orthodoxy or are you simply a stereotypical "Online Orthobro" who is in it for mere grifting purposes??

• 
  @cherubin7th29 күн бұрын

  When God divorced Israel, he said he will wait until she comes back. Return, faithless Israel, declares the Lord, I will frown on you no longer, for I am faithful, declares the Lord, I will not be angry forever (Jeremiah 3:12). If you put away your wife for cheating and not forgive her, then God will put you away for sinning and not forgive you. As we say And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors.

• 
  @jordanp3470Ай бұрын

  I find VaticanCatholic’s evidence and arguments way better than the Orthodox position. Pure facts so many people cringe at truth and will perish forever because of it

• 
  @Juan-gd1wd25 күн бұрын

  Hello. Thanks in advance. Do you also hold their position concerning matters such as invincible ignorance, baptism of desire and similar ?

• 
  @raymondvincentthm1642Ай бұрын

  Why do Ubi’s opponents always take to the bottle?

• 
  @timothylavin6365Ай бұрын

  I’m no historian but I am American, and never has a Catholic Church or Orthodox Church member evangelized me. Only Protestants have approached me, even Protestant off shoot cult groups members have approached me, but never a catholic or orthodox person invited me to their church

• 
  @GoodGodFatherGGFАй бұрын

  excoriating.... this guy..... he's...... got an interesting take on things that seems.... very inordinary.

• 
  @dainironfoot5834Ай бұрын

  Nothing

• 
  @TeaParty4ThugsАй бұрын

  The more I see protestant and catholic apologists, the more I think they believe apologetics is just shooting the breeze and coming up with stuff on the spot

• 
  @BermoodaTriangle11 күн бұрын

  Most definitely the case for Protestants. That’s literally the definition of Protestantism. Always has been and always will be the diy “church”.

• 
  @johnnyd2383Ай бұрын

  Lofton is Latin's propagandist who makes living out of U2Be clicks and he has to make sure his rating is high or else... he would have to become man, take regular job 9-5 and live off of his wages. If he decides to debate you and falls short, he would endanger his reputation and thus his earnings. Simple.

• 
  @EasternRomeOrthodoxyАй бұрын

  ☦️You are helping him by saying that. He is a Zionist modernist Trojan horse in the Catholic Church even. He is rejected as a clown by basically all Catholics who are not liberal evolutionists. He doesn't even know Latin. Not even the original Hebrew, of which I am fluent, having being living in Palestine.

• 
  @whitevortex832328 күн бұрын

  That is neither charitable nor nuanced.

• 
  @johnnyd238327 күн бұрын

  @@whitevortex8323 .. but is truth.

• 
  @EasternRomeOrthodoxy16 күн бұрын

  ☦️Lofton is no less than a son of Satan & a Modalist heretic. He is an ignorant revisionist & Modernist who promotes earthly filth like video games & teaches his son to play that vain trash. Also, you only need to study the history of the Roman Empire & quinisext council to see that Popes were never infallible, in fact Constantinople as the 2nd Rome is equal in privileges, being by extension the See of Peter, and only 2nd in honor.

• 
  @ryrocks948715 күн бұрын

  @@whitevortex8323 NOW THAT IS JUST UNCHAWITABLE, AND IT LACKS HYPERQUALIFICATION

• 
  @bobjenkins3rdАй бұрын

  Looking back, watching the entire 6, 7, 8 hours or whatever it was from Yasi played a significant role in me coming to Orthodoxy.

• 
  @rsissel1Ай бұрын

  Lofton Apologetic Method 1. That did not happen 2. And if it did, it doesn't change anything 3. And if it does, it's no big deal 4. And if it is, it's not the Pope's fault.

• 
  @theeasternjourneyАй бұрын

  Whole thing with both William and Elijah is that they love to water down vatican 1 and 2 in order to make it sound exactly like Orthodoxy. I don't know if they truly believe in what they teach but if they don't then they are maliciously trying to bring people to their fake church. God have mercy on them I hope that they learn what their church really teaches and repent of their heresies. I also pray that they return to the True Orthodox Catholic Apostolic Christian Church, which they obviously defend What they are defending here is Eastern Orthodoxy wrapped around a paper called 'Roman Catholicism'

• 
  @JoeApologeticsАй бұрын

  Love the work you do brother keep going🙏🏿☦️

• 
  @RansetsuАй бұрын

  I like the content but is your voice edited? It's difficult to listen to.

• 
  @henrik_worst_of_sinnersАй бұрын

  Scrambler as a precausion. RCs are nown to attack socially like women do.

• 
  @johnnyd2383Ай бұрын

  1:12:20 is hilarious... that guy Yasi states that Vatican 2 was supposed to be a friendly council with message to the world "we are not that bad".!

• 
  @acekoala457Ай бұрын

  The Council of the Sacramento Kings "We aren't that bad"

• 
  @EasternRomeOrthodoxyАй бұрын

  ☦️Good, I will watch it now. The See of Peter both according to the Gospels & Church history is to have supremacy, that us special previleges, but in no way it was ever infallible, that is unbiblical doctrine, an innovation. The Pope always was a part of the whole & had to have the concent of the Patriarchs. Fiducia Supplicans & all those modernist corruptions, perversions, deviation, contradiction with Church fathers & other abominations regarding modesty, are the ultimate proof, that Rome cannot function, unless it is in check - *by the eastern part* (as it was always been the case in antiquity).