R. Grant Jones

R. Grant Jones

Most of the videos here are Bible reviews. I'm more interested in the visual than the tactile interaction; typeface, paper quality, and layout matter more to me than hide and binding. Most of the Bibles I review I bought myself or they were given to me by relatives. In these reviews, I try to provide you with the details I wish I'd known myself before I bought the book. You will likely disagree with me on some things, especially if you like bright red letters and skinny gray fonts; references at the bottom of the page; or if you insist that all Bibles be in a single-column, paragraph-by-paragraph format.

I've been criticized for being critical of Bibles! But my goal is to provide the Bible-buying public with information to help them decide how to spend their hard-earned money. That necessarily includes showing flaws and imperfections.

The Everyday Bible KJV

The Everyday Bible KJV

The Bible Study Bible

The Bible Study Bible

From Apostles to Bishops

From Apostles to Bishops

Пікірлер

  • @Evangelical-Catholic
    @Evangelical-Catholic4 минут бұрын

    Cool Bible. Thanks for the review!

  • @Josh-yk6xk
    @Josh-yk6xk57 минут бұрын

    Oh my goodness never been more excited for a bible to come out. My daily reader is currently an oxford RSV but I have been wanting to switch to one with better formatting.

  • @mykstericeferg1258
    @mykstericeferg12584 сағат бұрын

    🎶 “Welcome back- Your dreams were your ticket out Welcome back- To that same old place that you laughed about…”👋😁 Please excuse the proceeding ramble from a new-ish viewer but, there’s a double surprise to be had here!😊 One: To suddenly have the pleasure of enjoying your new unboxing video and… Two: That it is the newest of the Thomas Nelson Sovereign Collection editions- The Revised Standard Version! (the one I was really looking forward to getting a good look at too) The fact that you present it to us no less an entire month early (from its listed shipping on the street date of August 13th, 2024) is really a Third surprise, and so your awaited return in this manner of content, is now a Trifecta of sorts!😄 Really appreciate being here for it, Mike Ferguson from N.J.

  • @chadwhitley
    @chadwhitley4 сағат бұрын

    Would have been nice to have edge-lined the leather cover (as they did with KJV and NKJV), but the other features look very nice.

  • @albertritchot5393
    @albertritchot53934 сағат бұрын

    I do hope you will review as soon as it comes out (anticipated to be November 2024) the RSV Ignatius Study Bible which is finally coming out as a one volume book with both OT and NT. Yes, we've missed your reviews.

  • @user-zo2ge3oe8d
    @user-zo2ge3oe8d5 сағат бұрын

    The full Ignatius Catholic Study Bible will be released November 15th. Will you be reviewing it?

  • @tony.biondi
    @tony.biondi5 сағат бұрын

    Thank you, Grant. Have missed your reviews and voice. Blessings.

  • @bos567564
    @bos5675646 сағат бұрын

    You're back!! I'm very glad to watch a new video of yours. God bless

  • @JimJones-kj8jk
    @JimJones-kj8jk6 сағат бұрын

    Looks great. I may get this. The RSV is my favorite translation.

  • @sagadiablo
    @sagadiablo6 сағат бұрын

    Very happy to see you post a new video, Dr Jones!

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones6 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting, sagadiablo!

  • @saulm58
    @saulm587 сағат бұрын

    Is this the return of the King of Bible reviewers? 🤓

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones6 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for the kind question, saulm58! Possibly.

  • @Dwayne_Green
    @Dwayne_Green8 сағат бұрын

    Wow it's been so long! Good stuff.

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones6 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting, Dwayne! Yes, it has been a while.

  • @Wanttoknowabout
    @Wanttoknowabout8 сағат бұрын

    Good to see you making a video again! This is very interesting. I am guessing that this is one of the only new RSV Bible available?

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones6 сағат бұрын

    'I am guessing that this is one of the only new RSV Bible available?' I think that's right. Evangelical Bible sells one, the New Oxford Annotated Bible RSV is still available, and other publishers produce Catholic editions.

  • @Home2Tennessee
    @Home2Tennessee8 сағат бұрын

    So glad you are back on board. Missed you!

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones6 сағат бұрын

    Thanks, Home2Tennessee! Videos are likely to be infrequent for the remainder of this year, but I hope to post one or two.

  • @Z201able
    @Z201able9 сағат бұрын

    Very happy to see another review from you! Blessings.

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones9 сағат бұрын

    Thank you for commenting!

  • @Meekman94
    @Meekman949 сағат бұрын

    Good to see you posting again. That’s a very attractive Bible! Wonder if there is a ESV version

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones9 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting! I'm not 100% certain, but I don't believe Nelson publishes the ESV.

  • @WesDunnavant
    @WesDunnavant9 сағат бұрын

    *Wonderful* to see another Grant Jones review! Best wishes.

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones9 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting, Wes!

  • @realwolfdude
    @realwolfdude10 сағат бұрын

    Glad to see you back ❤

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones9 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting, realwolfdude!

  • @SeektheLordsface
    @SeektheLordsface10 сағат бұрын

    ForANewHearT Shalom 🙏☺️

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones9 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting, SeektheLordsface!

  • @SeektheLordsface
    @SeektheLordsface9 сағат бұрын

    @@RGrantJones may the Father, Son and Holy Spirits presence, wisdom and love be with you and your family now and forever more Amen 🙏

  • @user-cn5pm7zg1u
    @user-cn5pm7zg1u10 сағат бұрын

    He's back!!!!

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones10 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting!

  • @scottforesman7968
    @scottforesman796810 сағат бұрын

    hopefully they will produce a hardcover-which I might be able to afford. I love the RSV.

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones10 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting, Scott. I haven't heard about plans for a hardback, but I believe Nelson is publishing three less expensive editions in black, brown, and purple imitation leather. Here's the link to Christian Book Distributor's page for the purple imitation leather edition: www.christianbook.com/personal-size-reference-bible-leather-purple/9781400337941/pd/337941?product_redirect=1&search_term=rsv%20persona&Ntt=337941&item_code=&ps_exit=PRODUCT|legacy&Ntk=keywords&event=ESRCP .

  • @hassanmirza2392
    @hassanmirza239210 сағат бұрын

    Welcome back Dr Jones 🎉 The KZread Bible fans were waiting for your return 😅 They should have published all of Apocrypha with it.

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones10 сағат бұрын

    Thanks, Hassan. 'They should have published all of Apocrypha with it.' I'd like to see both types: with and without the Deuterocanonicals.

  • @hassanmirza2392
    @hassanmirza23929 сағат бұрын

    @@RGrantJones I think nrsv is being discontinued now, and the woke and ultra-liberal nrsvue will take it's place. Hopefully RSV with complete Apocrypha will come back too.

  • @redsorgum
    @redsorgum10 сағат бұрын

    Welcome back. I have an older RSV. Although it’s a smaller Bible, the print of that era is very readable. I’ll have to check it when I get home, but I think it may be the first revision from the original printing. This is a nice looking Bible. ✌️

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones10 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting! I agree that the older print is very readable, but I think the font in the newer edition is even better. Also, the in-text headings are helpful in that regard.

  • @RobbieCupples
    @RobbieCupples10 сағат бұрын

    Oh yes!! I really like the RSV too, if I’m gonna be honest 😁

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones10 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting, Robbie!

  • @RobbieCupples
    @RobbieCupples5 сағат бұрын

    @@RGrantJones You're welcome!

  • @JosephAquino1430
    @JosephAquino143011 сағат бұрын

    Good to see you back at reviews!!! God Bless🙏

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones10 сағат бұрын

    Thanks for commenting, Joseph!

  • @peterpapoutsis496
    @peterpapoutsis49611 сағат бұрын

    Does it have the apocrypha? If so I'm getting it proto!

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones10 сағат бұрын

    Sorry, Peter, but it's a 66 book Bible. Thanks for commenting!

  • @peterpapoutsis496
    @peterpapoutsis49610 сағат бұрын

    @@RGrantJones Thank you for your reviews. I depend on them. I buy nothing unless you comment on it first. Thank you again Grant. God bless and enjoy.

  • @realwolfdude
    @realwolfdude10 сағат бұрын

    @@peterpapoutsis496Thomas Nelson is planning to release an RSV-2CE catholic bible which contains the books in the Apocrypha

  • @kirbysmith4135
    @kirbysmith41357 сағат бұрын

    I have been waiting on this release. I still have my old red hardback from seminary, and my ordination Bible was a RSV as well. Both over 40 years ago! Thanks for posting, Dr. Jones. Many of us are hoping for more Bible and book reviews as well as polls when you get settled into your new home. Grace and Peace.

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones6 сағат бұрын

    @@kirbysmith4135 - Thanks for the kind thoughts, pastor!

  • @DevlogBill
    @DevlogBillКүн бұрын

    Thank you for the review, I think I may purchase the older much smaller New Testament (red Bible) which you displayed. I now purchased the Blue hard covered Greek Edition Bible from Thrift Book Store. A couple of weeks back the book was being sold for more than $90.00 dollars, but the price dropped to $42 dollars. Been reading the Bible on and off for the past couple of years. I've always been a fan of the KJV Bible, I think it's the best English version. But decided to purchase the Bible which you were reviewing in this video because I started learning Greek over four weeks ago. I must say Greek is much more complicated compared to Spanish due to having to learn a brand-new Alphabet system. But after the fourth week I think, I am beginning to have a broader understanding of the Greek vocabulary and hopefully soon be able to at least read and understand my first paragraph. Once again thank you for the review of these excellent books I can't wait to receive my edition soon.

  • @cohenbryan8822
    @cohenbryan88222 күн бұрын

    The Catholic religion will bring in the one world false religion, it’s based on partial truths and they have manipulated the Bible for centuries

  • @Mark3ABE
    @Mark3ABE2 күн бұрын

    I have a Catholic Family Bible, a large edition, bound in genuine white leather, which was produced as a Catholic version of the sort of King James Family Bible found in many homes at the time. Since the translation of the new Confraternity Bible (so called because it was arranged by the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine) was not complete, it uses a mixture of translations. The Confraternity text is used for Genesis to Ruth, the Psalms and the New Testament. The Douay-Challoner translation is used for the remaining books of the Old Testament. It was published by the Good Counsel Publishing Co., Inc. of Chicago. In due course, the translation of the Confraternity Bible was fully completed and this was published in, I think, about 1973. The New American Bible is simply a revision of the Confraternity Bible. It is considered a reliable translation. It is not used in England, mainly because the language is a little too “transatlantic” and the 1966 translation of the Jerusalem Bible has been used in the Lectionary in England, however, this will be replaced, in Advent this year, by the English Standard Version (Catholic Edition). Until now, for teaching and study purposes, the English Church has used the Second Catholic Edition of the Revised Standard Version, since the Jerusalem Bible is not considered to be a direct, literal translation from the original languages. There are rumours that the translators used the very popular original French version of the Jerusalem Bible, translating this into English, while comparing their translation, of course, with the original texts (this has never been established and is denied by the translators!). The New Jerusalem Bible was not considered adequate by the English Bishops Conference and the Revised New Jerusalem Bible was considered even less satisfactory. However, in my view, the original 1966 translation of the Jerusalem Bible, in the version with the full set of translators’ notes, is quite reliable. I prefer reading the Knox translation myself, since it is a direct translation from the Vulgate made entirely by Monsignor Knox himself, without any assistance. Therefore, it does not read as if it has been put together by a committee and the style is uniform from start to finish. As to reliability, it is only as reliable as the Vulgate from which it was translated, of course. I have the three volume version with a full set of translator’s notes, which make it reliable, since Monsignor Knox does point out where the Latin text departs from the original Greek or Hebrew and he also makes it clear where he has used rather more colloquial language in translating from the Latin, although he never departs from the original meaning of the text. However, the language which Monsignor Knox uses is that of an English public school boy of the 1940s, which, of course, is what he was! The English Church did intend to use the Knox translation for the Lectionary, however, the instructions issued by Pope Pius XII in 1943 (in Divino Afflante Spiritu) made this impossible and the 1966 translation of the Jerusalem Bible was used as more closely adhering to the terms of that instruction. However, the Knox translation was used in preparing the new Breviary (‘the Divine Office”) for some of the passages of Scripture. Also, the new Breviary included some texts using the New English Bible (a Presbyterian translation) and the RSV, of course.

  • @user-zo2ge3oe8d
    @user-zo2ge3oe8d2 күн бұрын

    What do they mean that these women will someday judge angels?

  • @Mark3ABE
    @Mark3ABE2 күн бұрын

    The norms for Scriptural scholarship are to be found in “Divino Afflante Spiritu” issued by Pope Pius XII in 1943. This requires all Catholic translations of the Sacred Scriptures, in future, to be direct, literal, translations from the original languages, using the best and most accurate sources. After this direction was issued, it was no longer possible for the English speaking nations to continue to use either the Douay Rheims or the Knox translations, since they are not direct translations from the original languages, but translations from the Vulgate with the original languages compared, where necessary. I do still use the Knox translation, since I have the full, three volume, version, which has Monsignor Knox’s full translator’s notes, where he sets out where the Vulgate departs from the original languages. He was a Geek and Hebrew scholar and he translated the whole Bible single handed. As a result, his translation does read very easily, since it was not put together by a committee, as are most translations. In England, until recently, we have used two translations. The Jerusalem Bible (1966 edition) is used in the Lectionary, with some modifications introduced by Pope Benedict XVI. For teaching and study purposes and for translating passages included in document issued from Rome, until recently, the second Catholic edition of the RSV has been used. Now, this is to be replaced by the Anglicised Catholic edition of the ESV, which is now to be used for all purposes, rather than using two translations side by side, as in the past. So, the Lectionary has been revised to use the ESV. In Canada, the NRSV is used. In the USA, the New American Bible is used. This was formerly known as the “Confraternity Bible” since it was prepared by the US Confraternity of Christian Doctrine. It is considered to be a good, direct, literal translation from the original languages. It is not used in England, or in other English speaking countries, since the English is a little too American in style. I cannot really see why the translation publicised by this video should be necessary. There are already good translations which satisfy the norms set in 1943. I shall, myself, probably continue to use both the RSV (second Catholic edition) and the Knox version, for study purposes, since these contain much useful historical information. For example, since the Church used the Vulgate for so many years, it is useful to know how the Vulgate translates particular passages (sometimes, not quite accurately). Finally, of course, I do have a King James Bible (with Apocrypha) since the language is familiar in many cases. The original KJV remains such a good and accurate translation that a version has been produced using the modern equivalent English where the language has changed over the centuries, the New KJV. This is the version used by the Eastern Orthodox Churches in England and also by most of the Pentecostal and similar fundamentalist Churches.

  • @user-tu9mw7bt9g
    @user-tu9mw7bt9g4 күн бұрын

    The Bibles are really nice can I bought them in the Philippines?

  • @silver_cord
    @silver_cord4 күн бұрын

    I need one but man so pricey.

  • @rosemerrynmcmillan1611
    @rosemerrynmcmillan16118 күн бұрын

    Tolle Lege need to do a reprinting. So many people want one!

  • @JimJones-kj8jk
    @JimJones-kj8jk8 күн бұрын

    I once read through the whole bible using the JB including the apocrypha about 15 years ago. The notes were very informative and helped me a lot. I also have a New American Bible (not the NABRE) that has a lot of notes too. Even though I am not a catholic, I like reading the notes on their bibles.

  • @sascha6176
    @sascha61768 күн бұрын

    it would be nice instead of confusing (already confused) me, give a link to the best eastern orthodox (English) bible so I know what to read.

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones8 күн бұрын

    Sorry, but I can only tell you what I know, not what I don't know. And I can't identify the best Eastern Orthodox Bible in English. But perhaps others will see your comment and offer their opinions.

  • @DMB914
    @DMB9148 күн бұрын

    @RGrantJones Thank you for these reviews! They have really helped me to learn a lot about the different translations over the last few years. I have a question regarding the NJB's footnotes. How different are they from the notes in the original JB? Are they significantly different or mostly the same notes?

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones8 күн бұрын

    The NJB reuses some notes from the JB, but it also adds new ones and modifies or removes old ones. So they're similar, but not quite the same. Thanks for the question!

  • @DMB914
    @DMB9148 күн бұрын

    @@RGrantJones Thank you for your help!

  • @outaEaRtH-H302-Immanuel-Iesous
    @outaEaRtH-H302-Immanuel-Iesous9 күн бұрын

    Have you heard os something known and described as medical text in relation to biblical ancient texts and reports

  • @outaEaRtH-H302-Immanuel-Iesous
    @outaEaRtH-H302-Immanuel-Iesous9 күн бұрын

    Greetings R Grant Jones what new testament would you suggest is the best translation in your view would you say David Bentley hart this one?

  • @WordOfTruth316
    @WordOfTruth31610 күн бұрын

    this is why I stay with the KJV

  • @Christiantalk153
    @Christiantalk15310 күн бұрын

    Very strange they did not include the apocrypha, also a strange translation to do this in. Orthodox recommends the kjv or nkjv and are in line with majority text translations. The csb is a critical text base. Im unsure if its worth it, just finished the kjv study bible and have the life application & csb study bible. also want to read through the esv study notes.

  • @maryduffy2086
    @maryduffy208610 күн бұрын

    I recently purchased a NJKV and it was misshing the whole if Isaiah.

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones10 күн бұрын

    Did you return it?

  • @maryduffy2086
    @maryduffy208610 күн бұрын

    @@RGrantJones No, I purchased the book of Isaiah but I'm looking for a bible with the whole text.

  • @sweencreamer
    @sweencreamer12 күн бұрын

    Late to this video but I think faithfulness in Ephesians 2 refers to the faithfulness of Jesus, not us. Other scriptures would suggest this. Rom 3:22, 26 Gal 2:16, 20 Eph 3:12 Phil 3:9 Literal translations will read “faithfulness OF Jesus Christ” He was faithful because we were not and could not be. He is out portion and we bring nothing to the table, not even our own mustered up faith. It’s the gift of God. Thank you for the review!

  • @TheJackoloco
    @TheJackoloco12 күн бұрын

    does the oxford edition stay open on its own unlike the pocket edition one?

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones11 күн бұрын

    My hardback copy stays open from about page 50 forward.

  • @TheJackoloco
    @TheJackoloco11 күн бұрын

    @@RGrantJones this is helpful thank you and God bless you

  • @theholycrusaderchurch
    @theholycrusaderchurch14 күн бұрын

    I hope people ask for a refund. That's a satanic inverse.

  • @harrymeyers91
    @harrymeyers9114 күн бұрын

    I found with the pages sticking together I can read it in half the time.

  • @joyg7575
    @joyg757514 күн бұрын

    Thanks for your information on the Longprimer. That was very informative to see the differences of the different printer's versions.

  • @joyg7575
    @joyg757514 күн бұрын

    Brown calf skin Cameo, here.