Why JCB thinks hydrogen is the best alternative to diesel for heavy machinery, farming and HGV fleet

JCB are actively investigating the best alternative to diesel for powering their machines in this new age of alternative fuels to help combat climate change. They have discovered batteries are okay for light duty machines but not for the heavier load machines like excavators and tractors. Hydrogen fuel cells are also being tested but their cost is prohibitive, so JCB investigated the possibility of swapping diesel for hydrogen in their regular diesel engines and liked what they discovered..

Пікірлер: 1 500

  • @christinegibbins6105
    @christinegibbins61052 жыл бұрын

    That's a boost to British Engineering, feel proud to see that. Thank you Harry for a fascinating look at the future. Take care.

  • @feolender2938

    @feolender2938

    2 жыл бұрын

    A boost to british engineering would be to ignore the globalist paymasters, tell them to fuck themselves and stick with diesel . All these new engines might be fine for the likes of loard bumford (clear nonce) but it's going to cripple small businesses.

  • @supertramp6011

    @supertramp6011

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@feolender2938 exactly. This clown wouldn’t even know how to operate a spade,without invading the colonies to exploit their valuable minerals. Absolute BS?

  • @FishBaitBlue
    @FishBaitBlue2 жыл бұрын

    I work in Oil & Gas on the EPC side of things and have contact with people at the majors. I can confirm that this industry is increasingly getting focused on hydrogen.

  • @ADobbin1

    @ADobbin1

    2 жыл бұрын

    which you could split off of oil. perhaps not efficiently at this point but if they ever figure out industrial scale graphene production you have a market for all that carbon in the oil too.

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2

  • @kip8790

    @kip8790

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@brianevolved2849 Hydrogen is being produced by wind farms when there is no electricity demand. This is now going to become common place.

  • @maximmono1

    @maximmono1

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@kip8790 Hi, but where and how Hydrogen is stored after being "produced", do you know what is efficiency on electrolysis (very poor), then compression, cooling down and how to distribute to long distance? I am happy for Hydrogen being on Oil companies target, but unfortunately it won't be as clean as we would expect. Wind turbines are the dirtiest machines to produce electricity, mostly work on 30% efficiency, when not to windy is no good when to windy not good either. Electricity prices goes up as soon as Wind Turbines appears. This is the result of overproduction fines being sent to electricity suppliers not being able to receive energy over produced in windy days, the winner is Wind Turbine owner, NO ONE ELSE.

  • @jamessutcliffe3045

    @jamessutcliffe3045

    2 жыл бұрын

    Talk to me about this. We are developing a major Hydro project for green hydrogen in the UK.

  • @blackjacket_
    @blackjacket_2 жыл бұрын

    I had no point of view on any level towards these industrial brands/products. . Now I love JCB because of this research. What a great job, both with the video and the JCB engineering. 👌👌👌

  • @pattyreinholt8702

    @pattyreinholt8702

    2 жыл бұрын

    It's amazing how easy it is to brainwash the sheeple. Like the global warming scam. You'd think a "farmer" would be teaching people that CO2 is PLANT FOOD! And we are at historically low CO2 levels.

  • @baslifico

    @baslifico

    Жыл бұрын

    Then you've been suckered by the propaganda. Do some googling and read up on JCB, their lobbying, why they've been in the headlines for the last few years and how much damage they've helped inflict. I'm frankly staggered this channel has been suckered into shilling for them.

  • @WeirdSeagul
    @WeirdSeagul2 жыл бұрын

    Harry just has some of the most interesting content coming out of nowhere.

  • @harezy

    @harezy

    2 жыл бұрын

    Its not coming out of nowhere 😂😁. (Harry knows his shit that's why he started EVO).

  • @pauleng883

    @pauleng883

    2 жыл бұрын

    Exceptional video.

  • @garyihde2293

    @garyihde2293

    2 жыл бұрын

    was the helicopter saving green house gases.

  • @frutt5k

    @frutt5k

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@garyihde2293 He planted a redwood to compensate for it

  • @tonylarcombe1919

    @tonylarcombe1919

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@garyihde2293 4

  • @timb4373
    @timb43732 жыл бұрын

    An absolute landmark moment in the journey to decarbonising transport, agriculture and construction vehicles. Congrats to the team at JCB for cracking this, and well done Harry for some superb journalism - absolutely nailed it. Thanks so much.

  • @MOSSFEEN

    @MOSSFEEN

    2 жыл бұрын

    VOLVO TRUCKs have been using Hydrogen for the past 10 years

  • @appleaday3868

    @appleaday3868

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MOSSFEEN And Volvo trucks is going BEV now for good reasons

  • @MrManBuzz

    @MrManBuzz

    2 жыл бұрын

    This isn't "journalism". It more a thinly veiled advertisement, one that omits some very important negatives of hydrogen. (the same reasons why basically no one else is going this route)

  • @alantownsley6391

    @alantownsley6391

    2 жыл бұрын

    Nothing cracked at all. The numbers and logistics just don’t add up. Fuell cell maybe one day but not ICE.

  • @Angloman516

    @Angloman516

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@alantownsley6391 Have you heard what F1's Ross Brawn has had to say about Hydrogen's future use in F1

  • @JP-gi2pr
    @JP-gi2pr2 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant video Harry, an eye opener....Lord Bamford's take on the rush to electric is spot on. Politicians are guided too much by the press who are manned by less than well informed writers.

  • @budbud2509

    @budbud2509

    2 жыл бұрын

    Unfortunately a high degree of our leaders , of any political persuasion, are not visionaries or engineers ........ very sadly

  • @johnsherborne3245

    @johnsherborne3245

    2 жыл бұрын

    It’s disturbing how ignorant some journalists are, I used to read a popular scientific journal till it ran an article on a subject I was working on. It was so wide of the mark I stopped reading it. A lot of public thinking is however shaped by uninformed but articulate journalism. Well done Harry for seeking out knowledge, first hand.

  • @colinsandford4500

    @colinsandford4500

    2 жыл бұрын

    How many politicians are engineers and understand what they are being sold.

  • @budbud2509

    @budbud2509

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@colinsandford4500 Try looking for any signs of intelligent life in Parliament is a bit like looking for a needle in a haystack. Some of the political clips on YT u do wonder how they manage to fill in a form ?

  • @fortitudevalance8424

    @fortitudevalance8424

    2 жыл бұрын

    I love this channel it’s just so nice and refreshing to watch.

  • @Joe-qj7oh
    @Joe-qj7oh2 жыл бұрын

    One of the most important interviews, for a true insight, to our modern emerging world. Thank you.

  • @dipladonic

    @dipladonic

    2 жыл бұрын

    Unfortunately not. this offering ignores the main problem with hydrogen, which unfortunately Harry et al either choose not to mention or simply don't understand!

  • @parabot2

    @parabot2

    2 жыл бұрын

    your going to love your social credits , i bet .

  • @Myrmecia

    @Myrmecia

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@dipladonic What's the "main problem"? Is it getting the hydrogen to the farm, mine, constriction site, military battle and storing it there (safely and economically) for transfer to the using machine? Whatever the problem is, you can be sure this Bamford chap is working on it - with his engineers, prototypes and field testing.

  • @dipladonic

    @dipladonic

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Myrmecia If you want to save the planet from the man-made CO2 climate emergency the main problem with 'green' hydrogen is that it takes a huge amount of unreliable and dilute wind and solar energy to make a tiny amount of green hydrogen.

  • @Myrmecia

    @Myrmecia

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@dipladonic Thanks for your prompt reply and alerting me to this issue. I am not an engineer, so I will just have to stay alert for any coverage on this issue which expands on the importance of the "huge amount" and "tiny amount" you refer to.

  • @survivalist13
    @survivalist132 жыл бұрын

    Harry, correction to your comment on energy density. There are two measures of energy density for a fuel, gravimetric (the amount of energy in one kilogram) and volumetric (the amount of energy in 1 litre). Hydrogen is very good gravimetrically, 3 times better than diesel but much worse volumetrically, ~8-10 times depending on the pressure. This is probably still OK for a tractor, you will just have to fill up a bit more frequently and have a somewhat larger fuel tank. For aircraft it is a real problem due to the increased drag from the much larger fuel tanks. The other issue with hydrogen is the cost of the fuel, per kWh it is going to be significantly more expensive than electricity, although the exact price depends on who you listen to. Otherwise good video thanks.

  • @timb4373

    @timb4373

    2 жыл бұрын

    I think the other factor is that the Hydrogen engine uses a very lean mixture, so they can provide a full day's operating time with Hydrogen cylinders fitted inside the existing fuel tank space.

  • @lazynow1

    @lazynow1

    2 жыл бұрын

    Volumetrically, is that how you are now measuring the size of your obese wife?

  • @Goriaas

    @Goriaas

    2 жыл бұрын

    You can pressurise hydrogen, you can't batteries and diesel. So volumetric energy density isn't too important for hydrogen. Weight is key, we see this with battery electric vehicles

  • @since-jx1ix
    @since-jx1ix2 жыл бұрын

    Very surprised no-one has snapped you up for a show. You demeanor and honest feel approach, along with actual factual information make this content second to none.

  • @Ghhyuttgg

    @Ghhyuttgg

    2 жыл бұрын

    They already got that other car tv guy, whathisname

  • @malcolmlane-ley2044

    @malcolmlane-ley2044

    2 жыл бұрын

    Harry already has a show, it's just not called scheduled television like it used to be called

  • @dhdove

    @dhdove

    2 жыл бұрын

    Modern MSM producers etc. are so politicised they wouldn’t want Harry’s fact based approach to problem solving, it doesn’t fit their agenda. Best to stay on KZread Harry. BTW Another fascinating, insightful and thought provoking video Harry, thank you. TonyS

  • @UKArtlover

    @UKArtlover

    2 жыл бұрын

    I imagine Harry is very happy running his own show(s) he's done it all pretty much in the automotive world and is Lord of his own online meta-manor ( as they might say these days :)

  • @brettharter143

    @brettharter143

    2 жыл бұрын

    Cause he aint diverse enough

  • @malcolmlane-ley2044
    @malcolmlane-ley20442 жыл бұрын

    I love the strategic nature of this channel, petrol power will always remain interesting to me, although perhaps only as a leisure vehicle in the longer term; then we go to growing alternative fuel crops and now hydrogen powered engines which are clearly more akin to how we have replenished the fuel in our beasts in the past and seem to offer the longevity of driving hours lacking in battery powered options.

  • @mmmbilly
    @mmmbilly2 жыл бұрын

    Great video, great to see Hydrogen getting some recognition as the true zero emission alternative too. My wife has done extensive research on Hydrogen combustion retrofits for HGV and bus applications and the Gov are looking at it actively. I truly do not see why battery electric is seen as this one true hope for humanity. It makes no sense.

  • @dennisphoenix1

    @dennisphoenix1

    2 жыл бұрын

    You are correct it's seems to be an all or nothing approach. Lord Bamford is correct about mining for the metals needed too .

  • @SuperJohn626

    @SuperJohn626

    2 жыл бұрын

    Hydrogen In ICE is not zero emission. There will be nox

  • @PistonAvatarGuy

    @PistonAvatarGuy

    2 жыл бұрын

    Hydrogen causes metal embrittlement, it will destroy engines. It's also difficult to store a useful amount of hydrogen onboard something which uses it as inefficiently as an ICE vehicle.

  • @Kurol12345

    @Kurol12345

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@PistonAvatarGuy Is this for all metals? Maybe we need to develop the system more rather than sideline it completely. EVs are certainly not the complete answer

  • @PistonAvatarGuy

    @PistonAvatarGuy

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Kurol12345 I think that some can be made to endure exposure to hydrogen, but whether or not they can be made suitable for use in engines is another question. That's also just the beginning of the problems associated with using hydrogen as a fuel.

  • @Halliday57
    @Halliday572 жыл бұрын

    Is Harry the only farmer that wears a Pagani bodywarmer ?

  • @barrytipton1179

    @barrytipton1179

    2 жыл бұрын

    I don’t even know what a pagani body warmer is but who cares

  • @jamesdecross1035

    @jamesdecross1035

    2 жыл бұрын

    Don't forget, David Brown and Lamborghini were both tractor-makers!

  • @edthri

    @edthri

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@barrytipton1179 its a gilet type garment that says Pagani on it.

  • @markitoxi

    @markitoxi

    2 жыл бұрын

    Maybe Jeremy Clarkson

  • @eljanrimsa5843

    @eljanrimsa5843

    2 жыл бұрын

    so he's wearing a vest. a lot of farmers do that. older men need to stay warm

  • @marcmcsorley7707
    @marcmcsorley77072 жыл бұрын

    What knowledgeable Gent Lord Bamford is , fantastic.

  • 2 жыл бұрын

    Tug your forelock.

  • @sticklad7889

    @sticklad7889

    2 жыл бұрын

    @ have you watched the video or seen lord bamford and know he is a brexiteer and commented.

  • @ibrstellar1080

    @ibrstellar1080

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@ElliHarper Sadly we will never really got a real Brexit and with the new Marxist Governnent taking over there will never let us taste Democracy again.

  • @peterhoughton1589
    @peterhoughton15892 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic video, very proud to see a British Company, JCB, at the forefront, pioneering future technology. Thanks for sharing this video. 👍

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @benpattinson1
    @benpattinson12 жыл бұрын

    Excellent excellent excellent Harry. Great to see JCB and Lord Bamford leading the way on this. Need to spread the word.

  • @quentinstacy35
    @quentinstacy352 жыл бұрын

    Excellent documentary. Thanks to Lord Bamford and Harry for this informative piece.

  • @anthonyknox1493
    @anthonyknox14932 жыл бұрын

    This is fascinating stuff, and the best, up-to-date review regarding the future of machinery in my sector (Horticulture/Agriculture). Thanks Harry.

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2

  • @md560
    @md5602 жыл бұрын

    Harry your content is the most logical and interesting I’ve listened to.

  • @darrenprior6339
    @darrenprior6339 Жыл бұрын

    This is interesting and fascinating. I've often wondered how on earth we're supposed to power all these EV's when we can't even provide enough power to keep the country cool for a couple of days without blackouts. So many people don't think about how important downtime and payloads are to the heavy vehicle industry. Cars run for a max of an hour or two per day not 18hrs. Great stuff as always

  • @simongoodwin2035
    @simongoodwin20352 жыл бұрын

    Superb interview with Lord Bamford, what a great video Harry.

  • @andrewjenkins4730
    @andrewjenkins47302 жыл бұрын

    What a brilliant person Lord Banford is, a role model for all engineers and business minded people .

  • @luccadukka

    @luccadukka

    2 жыл бұрын

    I would suggest you do a little research before making such comments. His company set up is dubious to say the very least. From parent companies in Liberia and Holland. You will not hear many of the locals from Oxfordshire and south Warwickshire speak highly of them either. Not to mention the court cases involving other family members.

  • @settertwo

    @settertwo

    2 жыл бұрын

    Lord Bamford very similar to Harry Ferguson who was a brilliant engineer and inventor who was ahead of his time

  • @luccadukka

    @luccadukka

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@ElliHarper You clearly have access to the internet. Try goggling his name and court cases. Teach yourself 👍

  • @aaronm2742
    @aaronm27422 жыл бұрын

    Absolutely impressive. This is clearly where both cars and heavy vehicles need to go. Able to use parts of existing internal combustion engines, no restriction on range, keeps todays mechanics and engineers in jobs and its clean Whats not to like...governments and industry clearly need to get on board

  • @bentullett6068

    @bentullett6068

    2 жыл бұрын

    The government's and car companies are being controlled by a certain billionaire with his green credits so any other alternative technology is overlooked.

  • @fraserrose4209

    @fraserrose4209

    2 жыл бұрын

    The cost of producing hydrogen for fuel is and always will be prohibitive to hydrogens uptake in applications where battery electric is possible

  • @EP-bb1rm

    @EP-bb1rm

    2 жыл бұрын

    Burning hydrogen in a ICE is incredibly wasteful, still produces tailpipe emissions, and only serves to keep those that have blindly invested in further ICE production in business.

  • @gramursowanfaborden5820

    @gramursowanfaborden5820

    2 жыл бұрын

    they need not go anywhere. the only thing forcing this and keeping us dependant on fossil fuels is the Gov's hand in the petroleum industry's pocket. there is a huge number of alternative fuels which would be just as practical as petroleum when used in tandem.

  • @jackgibbons6013

    @jackgibbons6013

    2 жыл бұрын

    What’s not to like? The inherently lower end to end energy efficiency compared to the battery solution. Like has been said, batteries are untenable for certain applications, but for the majority they work fine, and simply use less energy.

  • @craiggreenhalgh1082
    @craiggreenhalgh10822 жыл бұрын

    The JCB Boss Seems A Really Decent & Approachable Guy 👍

  • @timbishop4977
    @timbishop49772 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating video, as always. Harry your videos are so educational and informative especially your crop walks. I look forward to the next one.

  • @dogpaw775
    @dogpaw7752 жыл бұрын

    impressive that the head honcho can talk so knowledgeably about his companies products and ther place in the market without handing over to a head of marketing after the prelim;'s, . British product, tremendously impressed.

  • @VanderlyndenJengold

    @VanderlyndenJengold

    2 жыл бұрын

    Lord Bamford also thinks Brexit is great. He was fined £22million for antitrust breaches. So I'd wait and see.

  • @dogpaw775

    @dogpaw775

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@VanderlyndenJengold I like the fellow even more.

  • @VanderlyndenJengold

    @VanderlyndenJengold

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@dogpaw775 If you buy his products it likely meant he's shafted you.. but if that's your thing....

  • @MrManBuzz

    @MrManBuzz

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@VanderlyndenJengold Given he's a Brexiteer, he like being shafted regardless.

  • @garethskidmore2275

    @garethskidmore2275

    2 жыл бұрын

    My son completed his apprenticeship for JCB during the pandemic only to be told that the company would not renew his contract…….and then simply started another apprentice…….sorry but they treat the employees like 💩

  • @johncrawford6640
    @johncrawford66402 жыл бұрын

    What a fantastic video Harry and team. JCB is an icon of british engineering and ingenuity and its refreshing to see them still at the forefront of R&D into new technologies.

  • @lp115lp

    @lp115lp

    Жыл бұрын

    Akin to James Watt's modification of the steam engine - making mechanized transport via rail a global norm? 🙂

  • @chartreuseatheypressto477
    @chartreuseatheypressto4772 жыл бұрын

    Harry's Farm is now the only reason why I turn on the television. Captivating, informative, informed and balanced. What began as research for a book is now a wholesome addiction. But who, please, is the camera person?

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2 However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @woutermollema
    @woutermollema2 жыл бұрын

    I've been binge watching all the Harry's farm video's the last couple of days and they are very good, thanks ever so much Harry!

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2 However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @craigburton2825
    @craigburton28252 жыл бұрын

    Couldn’t agree more with JCB. The very best of luck to this fantastic British company.

  • @davidanalyst671

    @davidanalyst671

    2 жыл бұрын

    good luck, because they are going to go bankrupt if they drop money into this crap

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2 However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @hybrid9mm
    @hybrid9mm2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you that was truly a great watch 👌 As a mechanic this makes me smile, JCB are on point, so great to see forward thinking towards long term solutions. Electric does have a place, but it’s cost and the precious materials needed are serious flaws, which has been overlooked.

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2

  • @hybrid9mm

    @hybrid9mm

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@brianevolved2849 if you have evidence to back up your claim, there is a conversation. If you don’t have any evidence then why bother making that claim. The combustion of hydrogen with oxygen produces water vapor as its only product: 2H2 + O2 → 2H2O where is the CO2? Read this before replying: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_internal_combustion_engine_vehicle

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    wiki hydrogen production

  • @hybrid9mm

    @hybrid9mm

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@brianevolved2849 wow that’s a poor argument 🤦‍♂️ Fossil fuel’s can be replaced by hydro power and solar, not to mention a hydrogen engine can run an electrical generator (no carbon there) Hydrogen can also be made from biomass etc. I skipped wind as that’s not actually viable, the blades last only 10yrs and end up in land fill, that is something to be moaning about.

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2 However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @KidCurry666
    @KidCurry6662 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant discussion. Some valid points, regarding run times etc, that many wouldn't realise. Thanks for posting.

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2 However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @nickhoward9343
    @nickhoward93432 жыл бұрын

    A very informative episode good work Harry

  • @garethclayton
    @garethclayton2 жыл бұрын

    Absolutely fascinating Harry. I really enjoyed this video. Any chance of seeing Lord Bamford’s car collection.

  • @Retrogamer71

    @Retrogamer71

    2 жыл бұрын

    I hope that's on Harry Metcalf's to do list.

  • @raymondhull3838
    @raymondhull3838 Жыл бұрын

    harry i always enjoy your farm videos, as a small farmer/entrepreneur i find it most interesting to watch your view ffom what i presume is a on farming background. However, i think your video with Lord Bamford and his vision of green hydrogeh energy one of the most informative and educational articles i have seen for many years.Well done.

  • @richardjonsson1745
    @richardjonsson17452 жыл бұрын

    Great content, and a very interesting interview. My only wish for the future is dedicated microphones for each party as your current setup pick up a lot of background noise.

  • @simonjones7785
    @simonjones77852 жыл бұрын

    Great to see british engineering is alive and wellwith a can doit is possibleattitude

  • @philthedogg

    @philthedogg

    2 жыл бұрын

    Great to see British engineering doing what they do best. World leading let’s hope the British government back it up and listen to them instead of being blinkered.

  • 2 жыл бұрын

    Yes doing what they do best stealing ideas and pretending to be innovators. You dumb gullible simps.

  • @simonjones7785

    @simonjones7785

    2 жыл бұрын

    I ran an engine diagnostic garage for 20 years/ and all the green heads kept on about batteries ( no ad mission of the damage to the planet to mine all the ingreadients or the pollution to ship them where yhey were needed/ battery front is dead no reliability too long to refuel it was BS in the first order / if fuel cells were just too expensive it had to come down to Internal combustion set up / step in the boffins who know the pressures that they need to inject the hydrogen at

  • @zzirSnipzz1

    @zzirSnipzz1

    2 жыл бұрын

    @ Stole what ideas do tell? British were way ahead of teh curve but always sabotaged by their own goverment, especially when they gave away lots of secrets to the USA during ww2. Ireland in the other hand asks Britain for handouts and is defebended By the UK RAF but your welcome lol

  • @user-fn1rb9ze6p

    @user-fn1rb9ze6p

    2 жыл бұрын

    @ care to elaborate 🤨

  • @matthewbutterfield7233
    @matthewbutterfield72332 жыл бұрын

    That's absolutely epic! Maybe Harry should look at getting a Fastrac in the near future....

  • @wendellgollop8753
    @wendellgollop87532 жыл бұрын

    Harry, your spot on with Sir Bramford, his cars here in Barbados are top notch among local or foreign homeowners here in Barbados and he has some of the coolest registration plates as well.

  • @JohnSmith-pd1fz
    @JohnSmith-pd1fz2 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic!! Thank you Harry and thank you JCB. All is not lost if we can fit a hydrogen powered engine in a 1988 Land Rover Defender.

  • @TeamRobertson
    @TeamRobertson2 жыл бұрын

    My favourite video you've done. Really interesting content and great to see jCB engineering a sensible replacement for diesel.

  • @davidquinn5906
    @davidquinn59062 жыл бұрын

    I can see the use of hydrogen in heavy plant, but hydrogen combustion? The efficiency will be appalling. Your hydrogen comes from electrolysis or reforming natural gas. It may be cheaper to buy the plant but what are the running costs vs a fuel cell?

  • @theotherstevesteve

    @theotherstevesteve

    2 жыл бұрын

    A 100kw fuel cell would cost a fortune and the reaction surface would need regular replacement. The people who gave that comment a thumbs up need to spend 5 minutes on the internet learning about fuel cells.

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2

  • @001sander2
    @001sander2 Жыл бұрын

    Fascinating watching this after watching the new video from yesterday. Amazing progress.

  • @bensmith5707
    @bensmith57072 жыл бұрын

    Very good video Harry, what great work by JCB!

  • @Improveng1
    @Improveng12 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant Harry, thank you sir

  • @salzgurke42
    @salzgurke422 жыл бұрын

    why does everybody think hydrogen will just fall out of the air? First Harry says a lot of countries dont have enough energy to charge electric vehicles and his solution is hydrogen which uses 5 times more electricity???

  • @dethrophes7283

    @dethrophes7283

    2 жыл бұрын

    It's shipable. So you could have massive solar farms on the equator that then ship or pipe the hydrogen around the world. Or you could have massive wind farms in the north see and then .... So it's far from impossible.

  • @TimForber69

    @TimForber69

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@dethrophes7283 the cost issue is very relevant though woht bost of those solutions. It's going around the houses (using electricity) to get to the same result.

  • @stuwilsonrallying
    @stuwilsonrallying2 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant video, superb insight into what can and should be done

  • @peterh9238
    @peterh92382 жыл бұрын

    Another brilliant video Harry 👍 and well done JCB 👍

  • @Ben-yn5lm
    @Ben-yn5lm2 жыл бұрын

    lovely chap wish we could see his cars!

  • @ianhill20101
    @ianhill201012 жыл бұрын

    Id vote for the lord, enjoyed listening to the man grest person and knowledgeable.

  • @bobspeller2225
    @bobspeller22252 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic news, I hope the car manufacturers get there heads around it very soon. Cheers Bob

  • @alfsporturbo
    @alfsporturbo2 жыл бұрын

    Harry smashing it out of the park. Super cool to see what JCB are doing #future

  • @forcesfarming8511
    @forcesfarming85112 жыл бұрын

    What a great subject Harry. This is very interesting and similar questions in the armed forces in reference to tanks etc.

  • @liammartin2389
    @liammartin23892 жыл бұрын

    Great access! Very interesting!

  • @davidfarrish3768
    @davidfarrish37682 жыл бұрын

    Great video. This has great promise. Thanks Harry. Liked your arrival transport as well. 👍

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2 However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @kriswarren4626
    @kriswarren46262 жыл бұрын

    fantastic interview and video Harry

  • @azog23
    @azog232 жыл бұрын

    It'd be interesting to know if the new hydrogen engines can be used as drop in replacements for the current diesel engines. Obviously the fuel tanks would need to be fitted too, but that would mean companies wouldn't need to go out and buy a whole new machine to be able to use hydrogen.

  • @nw7654

    @nw7654

    2 жыл бұрын

    Great idea, the kind of mindset we all need but unfortunately most are still all about making money.

  • @stevemillard2487

    @stevemillard2487

    2 жыл бұрын

    I get the impression from the video that the only change needed is the cylinder head, the injection and ignition system and the fuel tank. So keep your fingers crossed conversions may be possible.

  • @izaakfrost4186

    @izaakfrost4186

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@stevemillard2487 possibly the crank as well to change the stroke length. All fairly straightforward stuff though

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2 However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @victorhooper4236

    @victorhooper4236

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@brianevolved2849it's zero emissions. Just water vapor. Weren't you listening?

  • @johnhaynes9910
    @johnhaynes99102 жыл бұрын

    Excellent episode Harry and at last some commonsense :)

  • @dreadlocksoutdoors492
    @dreadlocksoutdoors4922 жыл бұрын

    Nice video Harry. I found it really interesting.

  • @jke360
    @jke3602 жыл бұрын

    Really enjoyed this one Harry Thanks

  • @aurellio33
    @aurellio332 жыл бұрын

    This channel's more important than the ITN news

  • @djcrossie

    @djcrossie

    2 жыл бұрын

    Doesn't take much to do that 😀

  • @davidbeckett6812

    @davidbeckett6812

    2 жыл бұрын

    How about BBC and ITN news combined!

  • @chrisflemington819
    @chrisflemington8192 жыл бұрын

    At last Lord Bamford has achieved a reliable, zero emission ICE which can be sold and maintained on a global basis and will probably produce similar, if not more power and torque than the best of the diesels. Now we have to ensure that the politicians realise their error in heavily supporting unsustainable electric power. I’ve recently ordered a hybrid car because I don’t believe a total electric car is the answer but we are governed by people who don’t have the understanding to put in place a replacement for fossil fuels which won’t damage the economy and will produce at worst the same performance or probably increased performance without increasing inflation to a point where that in itself becomes unsustainable. Thank you Harry for raising this matter and I hope that whenever possible you can use your influence to encourage what we are best at and that’s engineering in its finest form.

  • @proxy7863

    @proxy7863

    2 жыл бұрын

    Why is electric power unsustainable?

  • @chrisflemington819

    @chrisflemington819

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@proxy7863 it is my personal view that there is a limited amount of the materials such as lithium to make batteries and the cost of mining the raw materials will rapidly increase once cars are running on batteries. Also the footprint for transporting these raw materials is such that I suspect the environmental cost is not dissimilar to fossil fuels. Hydrogen is a much better way forward.

  • @LiamE69

    @LiamE69

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@chrisflemington819 You are worried about the transportation costs of the 10kg of lithium a car will use in its lifetime but not the 10 tons of fuel an ICE car uses? There is enough lithium around to make everyone on the planet a house out of the stuff. Lithium is common. Also lithium is not fundamental to battery tech. It is also recyclable. There is about as much lithium in a top end tesla as there is lead in a normal car. And lithium is more common than lead. We will never, ever, run out of lithium. As for transportation costs they are trivial compared with hydrogen transportation which requires specialist equipment.

  • @proxy7863

    @proxy7863

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@chrisflemington819 Lithium is one of the most abundant minerals on earth so we shouldn't run out for quite a while. Hydrogen is more abundant but difficult to get and not very stable. Mining and transport of lithium has an environmental cost but is a lot better than fossil fuels. Once local production (Cornwall for UK) comes online the these costs should fall even further.

  • @proxy7863

    @proxy7863

    2 жыл бұрын

    There is no such thing as a 'zero emission ICE'. Electric motors and batteries can be sold and maintained on a global basis, the technology is older than the ICE. Electric motors have more torque and power than a diesel.

  • @MarkGalbraithVideos
    @MarkGalbraithVideos2 жыл бұрын

    Very interesting indeed. Excellent video Harry.

  • @jimmybroom
    @jimmybroom2 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic video Harry and full of exciting info.

  • @jesperhvid9667
    @jesperhvid96672 жыл бұрын

    > politicians: that looks shiny > JCB: look what we built

  • @Frenk_Ok
    @Frenk_Ok2 жыл бұрын

    There have been H2 engines in past (BMW V12?) and I still don’t understand why to use H2 as fuel. Only reason I can think of is government money for development grants. There is no real technical advantage over natural gas: 1) H2 is manufactured from natural gas 2) Natural gas ICE is nothing new and is already well-developed technology 3) NG infrastructure is already developed and is quite safe. 4) There is enough NG for decades 5) You can always manufacture NG from H2 when it runs out.

  • @tayne5009

    @tayne5009

    2 жыл бұрын

    If you make hydrogen from natural gas it’s massively, massively polluting.

  • @mred3525
    @mred35252 жыл бұрын

    Excellent channel. Keep up the good work. 🌳

  • @nickhealey3388
    @nickhealey33882 жыл бұрын

    Great interview and facts about the future, brilliant harry

  • @CaptHollister
    @CaptHollister2 жыл бұрын

    I'd be very curious to know how they made a hydrogen-burning engine zero emissions. My understanding is that, air being mostly nitrogen, any combustion that uses air will generate NOx emissions regardless of the fuel being burned.

  • @garthnareng4898

    @garthnareng4898

    2 жыл бұрын

    Also the engine will be oil lubricated which will burn off in small amounts too.

  • @dennisphoenix1

    @dennisphoenix1

    2 жыл бұрын

    Will a catalyst or similar device help or some exhaust treatment like ad blue is for diesels ??

  • @garthnareng4898

    @garthnareng4898

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@dennisphoenix1 According to Wikipedia catalytic converters need carbon in the exhaust to get rid of NO2.

  • @dennisphoenix1

    @dennisphoenix1

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@garthnareng4898 I haven't done any research on the subject. Just thinking about it

  • @garthnareng4898

    @garthnareng4898

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@dennisphoenix1 I also assumed a cat would work, but decided to look it up and I'm glad I did.

  • @petemarshall7784
    @petemarshall77842 жыл бұрын

    Surely this could be quite misleading, because there is no mention of how much the fuel itself will be and from what i understand making and supplying the hydrogen is the problem.

  • @fraserrose4209

    @fraserrose4209

    2 жыл бұрын

    You're correct. This process is hugely inefficient. The cost of hydrogen will never be able to complete with the cost of charging a battery. A technology like this will only be plausible in situations where battery electric is infeasible

  • @cosmonauteable9151

    @cosmonauteable9151

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fraserrose4209 "Will never be able to complete" is a very bold claim. In terms of physics/math, nuclear power using h2 as energy storage is probably the most clean alternative we have available right now. The problem now is that the EV lobby has become too big and they will not let this narrative fly.

  • @youngdude7500

    @youngdude7500

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@cosmonauteable9151 you could be right, but storing hydrogen is exactly the problem, no? Energy density per volume is very poor for hydrogen.

  • @JRattheranch
    @JRattheranch2 жыл бұрын

    Absolutely fascinating! Thank you!

  • @ewanebbs4796
    @ewanebbs47962 жыл бұрын

    Really interesting and informative video!! Absolutely amazing 👍

  • @ekultaylor4463
    @ekultaylor44632 жыл бұрын

    I do think the carbon-free future for agriculture, forestry, and heavy construction is hydrogen, but not combustion. Batteries are not a good fit for heavy equipment for exactly the reason Lord Bamford identified, but combustion has its own serious downsides around maintenance and efficiency. Fuel cells are expensive today, but economies of scale will bring them down quickly as they scale up. They are high tech devices, but not that fundamentally hard to produce. H2 combustion might be a good transition technology (if used with green H2, which the vast majority currently available isn't), but I see fuel cells as the long term solution given the vastly reduced complexity and long lifecycles of electric motors over combustion. The 40% efficiency of combustion combined with 40% efficiency of producing green hydrogen will just make the cost of fuel far too high to run the equipment. A fuel cell will be able to extract so much more useful work from the same amount of hydrogen

  • @richardharrold9736

    @richardharrold9736

    2 жыл бұрын

    The issue with fuel cells is one of (a) cost - JCB's tracked digger with a fuel cell drove the price up 130% - and (b) reliability, as fuel cells require ionised distilled water and absolutely 100% effective dust filtration, so they really don't like working in fields or quarries...

  • @harpoonlouis

    @harpoonlouis

    2 жыл бұрын

    Plus the cost of compressing hydrogen to 300 bar in vast quantities makes H2 a very expensive proposition.

  • @MattOGormanSmith

    @MattOGormanSmith

    2 жыл бұрын

    He identified the problem as the weight of the batteries, on vehicles which usually have large dead counterweights anyway. You can't expect someone standing in his family's ICE factory to be unbiased.

  • @richardharrold9736

    @richardharrold9736

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MattOGormanSmith he builds BEVs as well. A 20-ton machine going up to 28 tons is no joke.

  • @billbligh4547
    @billbligh45472 жыл бұрын

    So this is the inception of Harry’s aviation channel. Chocks away!

  • @basementracer7622
    @basementracer7622 Жыл бұрын

    Wow how informative, very nice video Harry. This was really interesting.

  • @preonmodel8354
    @preonmodel83542 жыл бұрын

    Great Harry, I was wondering and pondering about all that.. Can you put this video on Harry’s Garage as I believe it’s an interesting argument for keeping car prices down for consumers , will open many peoples eyes and could interest companies to produce hydrogen fuel..

  • @tayne5009

    @tayne5009

    2 жыл бұрын

    I can see hydrogen working for big stuff such as planes and ships but it makes no sense for cars. You’d have to build an entirely new infrastructure for it, all the tanks need to be very high pressure, above ground at filling stations and you’ll need a new fleet of tankers trailers in addition to all the new hydrogen production. That’s going to cost a huge amount of money which will all be passed onto the consumer. And electricity is everywhere….

  • @martinjohnson4264
    @martinjohnson42642 жыл бұрын

    Hydrogen has terrible power density even at 350 bar 23kg/m3 so 220ltr tank for 5kg. Excavator 5kg H2 x 130MJ/kg = 650MJ. Diesel 45MJ/kg x 130 kg (160 lhr tank) = 5900 MJ so you to fill up 9 times for every diesel tank. Each molecule is the lightest of all elements so low energy per unit of volume

  • @johnsherborne3245

    @johnsherborne3245

    2 жыл бұрын

    Where does the hydrogen come from?

  • @LiamE69

    @LiamE69

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yeah Harry was wrong to say hydrogen has more energy than diesel per litre. The JCB guy quickly corrected him to say per unit of mass but I'm not sure many people would have picked that up.

  • @martinfoster288

    @martinfoster288

    2 жыл бұрын

    Its so energy intensive to make the hydrogen and then to burn in an ice engine is crazy.

  • @JoppeOSL

    @JoppeOSL

    2 жыл бұрын

    It requires about 3 times as much electricity to run an ICE compared to run it directly on electricity, and the transport- and fueling infrastructure- cost for hydrogen is insane. think of the on-site diesel drum with pump used today vs the 1-2 million £ rigg required to refuel a hydrogen tank under high pressure.

  • @jackgibbons6013

    @jackgibbons6013

    2 жыл бұрын

    Volume isn’t really that big of an issue, for most ground based applications. The weight and cost of batteries is their issue.

  • @g0fvt
    @g0fvt2 жыл бұрын

    A very thought provoking and interesting video, the ICE certainly has a lot of bad press based on incomplete information and assumptions. A friend and I did a shady conversion to a Vauxhall Viva to run it on butane/propane in the late 1970s, literally an evening spent converting an SU carburetor so it would meter low pressure gas. Far from an engineering marvel but it looks like the industry and governments have little interest in doing similar. There is a lot of merit in adapting existing technology, though of course carrying hydrogen at hundreds of bar pressure in a fast moving passenger car presents different challenges too. Well done with your content Harry, always educational.

  • @matspencer3860

    @matspencer3860

    2 жыл бұрын

    We don’t have to have it compressed if it’s made onboard hydrogen gas can be mixed with diesel to make it more combustible making current engines much more efficient there is a company developing small ish on board hydrogen units for lorries in the states at the moment

  • @MattOGormanSmith

    @MattOGormanSmith

    2 жыл бұрын

    LPG and hydrogen are very different beasts.

  • @g0fvt

    @g0fvt

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MattOGormanSmith, yes they are, but I am sure a 1972 Vauxhall Viva van would run on hydrogen too.

  • @youngdude7500

    @youngdude7500

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@matspencer3860 making hydrogen requires energy, which needs to be carried on board as well. Is it then not more efficient to use that energy directly for propulsion? Please provide a link for that company in the US making H2 units.

  • @malcolm8564

    @malcolm8564

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@matspencer3860 Making hydrogen from what?

  • @TheWrenchinOperator
    @TheWrenchinOperator2 жыл бұрын

    Absolutely beautiful!!! Thank you for helping advance such an incredible technology!

  • @johnfurnival4133
    @johnfurnival41332 жыл бұрын

    Very Interesting, Thanks for JCB for letting Harry shows us the new technology

  • @GarryMcGovern
    @GarryMcGovern2 жыл бұрын

    'The problem is not with the engine, the problem is with the fossil fuel'. So simple, yet WHY is this so difficult for politicians (who are making the short-sighted decisions to kill the ICE) to understand? By all means set the limits - but leave the engineers to come up with the solutions: EVs/Batteries are NOT the sole solution.

  • @Zadster

    @Zadster

    2 жыл бұрын

    "When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" There is not a single scientist or engineer in the Downing Street cabinet.

  • @tedtheturbot

    @tedtheturbot

    2 жыл бұрын

    no hydrogen comes from water H20 all you have to do is split the hydrogen from water with electricity (hydrolysis). You guys need to wake up, the reason why this tech hasn't been used is because they can't charge us anywhere near as much (or they've yet to think of a way they can charge us) for using water as fuel. It's very important to understand this is a deliberate premeditated act of greed. Follow the money..

  • @EP-bb1rm

    @EP-bb1rm

    2 жыл бұрын

    The majority of Hydrogen today (97%) comes from natural gas, not from water. Burning hydrogen still produces NOx emissions at the tailpipe.

  • @tedtheturbot

    @tedtheturbot

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@EP-bb1rm if that's the case they are deliberately ignoring water as an alternative source for hydrogen to justify what would be a significant cost increase at the pump.

  • @vasopel

    @vasopel

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@tedtheturbot only countries that have enough nuclear power plants will have enough energy to make hydrogen from water as economical as making hydrogen from natural gas.

  • @orange77_
    @orange77_2 жыл бұрын

    "there's a charge to electric" I see what you did there Harry!

  • @davidcurry4433
    @davidcurry44332 жыл бұрын

    Another great video, but i wonder if Boris or Sunak have watched this video yet, or any politician. I totally agree with Lord Bamford, battery is not the future.

  • @George_Ren
    @George_Ren2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for a very informative and thought provoking video.

  • @jeffmoose495
    @jeffmoose4952 жыл бұрын

    He'd like to influence the powers that be, honestly, he has several tory MPs in his pockets, why not just buy more..... he is pushing against an open door, the reason the powers that be dont want electric is they cant sell it and tax it heavily like they do with petrol and diesel.

  • @somebloke13

    @somebloke13

    2 жыл бұрын

    OK Communist

  • @davidbryan6484
    @davidbryan64842 жыл бұрын

    Be interesting to see where hydrogen fits into transport and construction, Volvo seem to be going electric. I was skeptical about hydrogen but they make alot of interesting points

  • @zopEnglandzip

    @zopEnglandzip

    2 жыл бұрын

    It's just so bloody dangerous, it's so common to get a bit of diesel stink from a 5 yo machine, when that happens on a hydrogen machine... Kablamo!

  • @proxy7863

    @proxy7863

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@stumpyplank6092 hydrogen is more dangerous than batteries

  • @zopEnglandzip

    @zopEnglandzip

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@stumpyplank6092 storage under much higher pressure than other common fuel gasses, the range of concentrations at which it will combust in air is far wider than any other fuel and it's atoms are so small that they pass through steel.

  • @proxy7863

    @proxy7863

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@stumpyplank6092 I have no problem with hydrogen. Was just pointing out your were wrong to say batteries are "infinitely more dangerous".

  • @zopEnglandzip

    @zopEnglandzip

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@stumpyplank6092 methane is a bio fuel, produced mainly from waste which would emit it into the atmosphere regardless of our input, the bio-gas industry is already well established and feeding into the gas grid/straight to power stations, the reason it makes so much sense to focus on bio gas is because we've already got the infrastructure in place for bottled/forecourt cng/lpg and any shortfall in production from waste (which has hardly been tapped yet) could be taken up by natural gas or in the future, gas made by co2 sequestration which admittedly requires hydrogen but unlike pure hydrogen the resulting gas can be stored as a liquid without cooling at comparably low pressures while being far more dense. Regards your reply to the other chap about musk, he's sold a bit of snake oil but it seems to me the technology tesla truly excel at is battery management, I'm aware there have been some bad fires, and lithium batteries can explode if shorted but these are easily negated and comparable to a current petrol vehicle in terms of destruction. I wouldn't want to be within half a mile of a hydrogen hgv that'd caught fire and if you've got a site with storage and multiple hydrogen machines operating it'd look like Nagasaki when the dust cleared.

  • @teddytiptree4450
    @teddytiptree44502 жыл бұрын

    Really really interesting video Harry! It must have been amazing meeting lord Bamford. I just can’t wait to see these engines hopefully being manufactured for the worlds agricultural and HGV industry.

  • @michaelfk2548
    @michaelfk25482 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant video...... ( would love to see Lord Bamford collection ...just thinking )

  • @craighenderson4135
    @craighenderson41352 жыл бұрын

    This is so interesting! Something i didnt even know existed,definitely the way to go its almost the same as diesel just without the emissions.👍

  • @judemurphy3356
    @judemurphy33562 жыл бұрын

    Harry glad you are making content like this and answering the questions we all want answers for . Great to see JCB taking on the challenge and great of lord bamford to take the time to talk with you . Really enjoy this content from Harry's farm . 👍

  • @sergioduran8948
    @sergioduran89482 жыл бұрын

    I learned so much from this video. Thank you

  • @harrymcglade7422
    @harrymcglade74222 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant informative video as normal, keep the great content coming :-)

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2 However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @stephentilley6645
    @stephentilley66452 жыл бұрын

    People are frightened of hydrogen by the images of the Hindenburg, up until the advent of natural gas most home had hydrogen on tap in the form of coal gas. I would sooner be in a room full of hydrogen - than a room full of petrol vapour. We need to embrace hydrogen as a fuel of the future.

  • @tinetannies4637

    @tinetannies4637

    2 жыл бұрын

    Hindenburg imagery might be part of it. But there are many practical issues with hydrogen as well that makes it less suited than batteries, at least for cars. There are efficiency losses from creating electricity, using that electricity to split water, and then using the resulting hydrogen in fuel cells to again create electricity. And this process, with its inefficiencies, is still more efficient than combusting hydrogen as a mechanical force with the resulting in thermal losses. Then there are the storage and transport complexities related to hydrogen versus pumping electricity through wires and into batteries.

  • @rspandit4786

    @rspandit4786

    2 жыл бұрын

    You’d still suffocate

  • @southney7211
    @southney72112 жыл бұрын

    Be good to see freevalve technology on a hydrogen engine and what’s possible in terms of ice efficiency.

  • @petermolnar8667

    @petermolnar8667

    2 жыл бұрын

    Depends on the use case, would be interesting to see how it could further optimize fuel economy in a car for example where you have varying power needs, but in machinery etc you normally want to minimize failures and downtime in a narrow range of high loads, hence the widespread use of push rods even today 🤔

  • @southney7211

    @southney7211

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@petermolnar8667 in the automotive application; I mean. Agreed that reliability is the key in this application and the use of freevalve technology would of course be expensive.

  • @ArchersView
    @ArchersView2 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating talk with Lord Bamford! JCB are a true innovater for the future.

  • @TheRolandSparling
    @TheRolandSparling2 жыл бұрын

    Excellent video. I am impressed by the engine shown . I suppose they could make a smaller version that would suit a car. A 2.4 litre Hydrogen IC engine sounds good to me. By the same theory they could make bigger ones too , suitable for LGV use. I have been believing that batteries are NOT the future, and this video backs up my theories. Lord Bamford and his company have made me very happy today. Just 1 point I would like to emphasise regarding future cars , 1/3 of the UK population live in homes with NO suitable place or access to a charger . They live like me in a flat. Hydrogen makes so much sense. Well done JCB and Harrys Farm. 😀

  • @brianevolved2849

    @brianevolved2849

    2 жыл бұрын

    oil companies attempting to sell oils and gas dressed up as hydrogen it is a scam Depending on the quality of the feedstock (natural gas, rich gases, naphtha, etc.), one ton of hydrogen produced will also produce 9 to 12 tons of CO2 However, hydrogen combustion with air produces oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx. In this way, the combustion process is much like other high temperature combustion fuels, such as kerosene, gasoline, diesel or natural gas. As such hydrogen combustion engines are not considered zero emission.

  • @tonyflying1550
    @tonyflying15502 жыл бұрын

    What’s needed is for formal 1 to use hydrogen. They are looking at changing their engines in 3 years.

  • @andyshepherd5067

    @andyshepherd5067

    2 жыл бұрын

    when one wins le mans next year ...... after all hybreds won there 4/5 years before F1 thought of it. look at disc brakes

  • @johnsmith1474

    @johnsmith1474

    2 жыл бұрын

    Ha! That is exactly what is NOT needed, please to back to your PC hole and figure out who to complain to about your victimization.

  • @thegreat7861

    @thegreat7861

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@johnsmith1474 what are you talking about?

  • @malcolm8564

    @malcolm8564

    2 жыл бұрын

    Strange how people love all that tax dodging.

  • @thegreat7861

    @thegreat7861

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@malcolm8564 hydrogen use dodges tax?

  • @mattb5667
    @mattb56672 жыл бұрын

    Great news and long liv the conventional engine IMO I’ve always thought how is electric going to work with plant and agricultural machinery this gives us some hope for the future 👍👍👍 Cheers Harry great watch!!

  • @davidlancaster2642
    @davidlancaster26422 жыл бұрын

    A really interesting video Thanks Harry and JCB

  • @automotivetales
    @automotivetales2 жыл бұрын

    Interestingly JCB point out there is more energy by mass for hydrogen, but the issue is volume - the density and storage of hydrogen is the big challenge. In gaseous form it isn’t energy dense enough, in liquid form it needs to be maintained at impractically low temperature. Hydro carbon fuels are an incredible fuel. I think utilisation of the highly developed reliable internal combustion engine is critical, but I still think synthetic fuels are the way forward. More energy I put up front but greatly simplified logistics and hugely improved energy density, while also continuing to use ICEs. Fascinated to see how they get on with development at JCB - they are certainly driving the conversation forward! Would love to chat to you about this Harry, so much more content to be had on topic! Jon :)

  • @garthnareng4898
    @garthnareng48982 жыл бұрын

    Without fuelcells, there is no point in hydrogen, you might as well use synthetically produced hydrocarbons.

  • @garthnareng4898

    @garthnareng4898

    2 жыл бұрын

    @Simon Colby But hard to store and use compared to carbons. Gas as opposed to liquid powered vehicles are banned from parking garages for example. Low volumetric energy density also a big problem.

  • @lordsamich755

    @lordsamich755

    2 жыл бұрын

    Or just keep burning diesel, which is the entire point for their advocates.

  • @lordsamich755

    @lordsamich755

    2 жыл бұрын

    @Simon Colby Easy and efficient are not the same thing. I can just as easy say you can recharge a battery anywhere that has access to electricity. The key difference is that the battery is > 90% efficient.

  • @garthnareng4898

    @garthnareng4898

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@lordsamich755 So long as we made the diesel by capturing CO2 then fine, the only problem then is NOx.

  • @lordsamich755

    @lordsamich755

    2 жыл бұрын

    @Simon Colby "and far heavier as well as having a rather short life expectancy." _Weight really seems like an overstated issue on a tracked vehicle._ _Life expectancy is also subjective. Especially compared to an internal combustion engine._ "Not to mention the environmental impact sourcing the resources to manufacture the batteries and then disposing of what cannot be recycled" _People who glom on to this talking point seldom know what they are talking about._ _They certainly don't do the numbers involved to understand which materials are in short supply vs those which simply are not._