Everything about these productions are just - excellent!

@Boyd1875

4 жыл бұрын

D S , I found this channel about a month ago and I just love this channel.

@ereynatetasgrafas9933

3 жыл бұрын

Amen

One of the best complete documentaries I have ever seen dealing with The Bible.

The answer is... God wanted to make them! God enjoyed designing His wondrous variety.

@htos1av

4 жыл бұрын

Can you imagine how his jokes will be?

@darthbane2669

4 жыл бұрын

Indeed we cant even comprehend it all, we can observe it, but so much we barely even truly understand.

@nordscan9043

4 жыл бұрын

Every creature is made for a purpose.

@GathKingLeppbertI

4 жыл бұрын

Your comment begs the question: Is it possible for our Father to want or be in want? I think not. Nor do i believe it.

"Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen." Romans 1:25 That truth was Genesis. The tares want to tear down the truth and push the lie. Oh precious wheat, stand strong in Christ.

@Simon-1965

2 жыл бұрын

It started about a generation before Darwin published his origin of the species, after that theory his book became the truth to many and the many taught it to every generation since. It's both sad and despicable what Darwin caused people to believe.

...Same with the "eye"...and lots of things. You cannot have a "partial eye" that is "evolving". The whole eye has to be there or it doesn't work at all....You can't have "partial birds". The flight system is there and intact or it doesn't work at all, rendering the creature defenseless.....

@wms72

4 жыл бұрын

@@mickhealy572 What makes you say that? Your comment has nothing to do with what Lonnie Christopher wrote.

@pocadon

4 жыл бұрын

@@wms72 yep that went right over their head.

@get-the-lead-out.4593

4 жыл бұрын

@@wms72 Mick Healy is just another adolescant troll. He's throughout the comments here trying to start arguments and can see how much of clueless doofus he is

@willywonkalucretia

4 жыл бұрын

@@hansdemos6510 You do realize that there are zero "transitional" forms alive today? Darwin himself, knew this was a major conflict with evolutionary thinking. Evolution is a fairytale, which people, who deny God's existence, place hope and faith in.

@FilipCordas

4 жыл бұрын

@@willywonkalucretia You do know Darwin was alive 200 years ago do you have some that is worried about this and lived in this century?

Great info. Thanks!

Another great video! Thanks!

The imagination of The God of Jacob is awesome. I have no doubt that what we see does not even scratch the surface of what GOD can do. I circled the earth from my time in the U.S. Navy and seen (w/my eyes) birds that "swim" deep underwater then resurface to fly away w/the fish they caught, fish that "fly" (as I looked through the hole for the anchor chain on the bow of a carrier), birds that "run" up to 40 mph, fish that "climb" vertical cliffs to mate and lay eggs at the top of the cliff on islands in the pacific, etc, etc,. ALL created by HIM. It is written "No eye has seen, no ear has heard, nor has it entered into the imagination of man The Wonderful Things GOD Has Prepared For Those Who Love HIM". It will take eternity to learn HIS ways.

@pocadon

4 жыл бұрын

@@mickhealy572 me again Mick! Wow this is an all time low for even you. Insulting military personnel and trying to prop yourself on a platform above all who disagree with you. Does it matter what a person's job is to correctly discern truth from goo to you fiction? Go get a book on logic...PLEASE! You're making a spectacle of yourself by making just about every comment I caught you on. You are inconsistent and irrational. Just sit down for awhile, put your worldview together and follow it to its conclusion. If you actually took the time to do that you wouldn't be such a bigot. That is what you are by definition. You lurk around creationists sites to try and mock and belittle them because they don't believe what you do. You resent people who dare challenge the modern paradigm (which changes daily in your system) because you feel intellectually superior to them. I only respond to you because I feel pity on your soul. Yeah, yeah...you don't believe you have one but we both know you are just lying to yourself. I think you like to hate but bigotry has no place in the comment section and you are the bigot and bully in this section. I still prayed for you anyway because everyone deserves it. I hope you understand that one day Mick because this life is pretty short.

@billperez1141

4 жыл бұрын

@@mickhealy572 I was one of you !!! During my time in the U.S. Navy I was a mocker & scoffer of Christians as you are today. It was a few yrs. after my military service I became a believer in The Gospel of Jesus Christ. So look at it like this... I was just like you are today.... Imagine that....Then The GOD of Jacob had mercy on me a sinner.....Then I learned "The Truth" which the world hates...."In the beginning GOD created the heavens & the earth".... & it has been an awesome experience these last 40 yrs growing in the knowledge of the power and glory of The Living GOD Creator of heaven and earth. (I was attached to a Fighter Squadron VF-114 working on the best fighter at that time the F-14 Tomcat)

@darthbane2669

4 жыл бұрын

It will be a relief to learn from the very source, no longer will we be deceived by scientist to fit their satanic agenda.

Thank you and praise God for your channel of truth! Only those who choose to be blind can ever see anything but the Creator in His creation!

I Love Birds and have a variety of wild birds visit the garden.. and compare the new comers to Atheists as they will not come close to be fed... the older birds know me and at times will sit and wait for me to come feed them and I do, they give me great pleasure to watch and listen to and I see these older ones as Christians.... it's all about that relationship... the closer you get the better fed you will be. Thanks for another great video.. simple and true.

God choose the foolish things of the world to confound the wise.

@pocadon

4 жыл бұрын

@@mickhealy572 I swear I keep running into this screen name making the same arbitrary fallacies over and over again. Do you not see how your comment can just be flipped right back on you? Did you right that comment because you didn't get it? 🙄

@mysticalglowtv1796

4 жыл бұрын

@@mickhealy572 You seem to be somewhat confounded...

3:30 for the high speed Top Gun tower buzz past Dr Wood. God built them with a need... a need for speed!!

The Doctor of Management (DM or DMgt) is an applied research doctorate (or professional practice doctorate) with a degree focus in management, leadership, and organizational topics."

Monotremes & marsupials are not considered separate from mammals because they lay eggs or have pouches. Neither do i think archeopteryx & raptors should be considered separate from birds because they have claws & teeth & long tails. They're just a type of bird.

He admits that the Archaeopteryx has both dinosaur and bird traits but don’t call it a transitional form. Then he doesn’t give clear answer why it’s a unique created “kind”. He just yells “I don’t know” @9:41 and laughes it of. Is Genesis History? Nope.

@timtherrien7843

4 жыл бұрын

So unless someone knows EVERY answer they cannot speak to what they do know with certainty? By that logic Stephen Hawking should have kept his mouth shut about cosmology because he was not an expert in Applied Psychology. "Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions." Proverbs 18:2.

I am curious as to why no one discusses the protoavis. I learned years ago that it is a bird as modern as a robin and about that size but is (according to evolution religiosity) much older than archaeopteryx, but except for some obscure web sites, the protoavis is all but forgotten. Why?

@f.u.m.o.5669

8 ай бұрын

Protoavis is chimeric. Containing 2-10 different animals. Creationists don't want to admit this because they like supposed evidence that supports them. The people who actually think Protoavis is a bird are either misinformed, or lying.

@ajmittendorf

8 ай бұрын

@@f.u.m.o.5669 I find you arrogant and presumptuous.

Shows green wing teal… says it’s “kinda like a duck” Lol

Venom?! Never heard that before

Imagine the neurology needed to coordinate flight.

Actually, there are some modern birds with teeth and some with wing claws, so those features of Archaeopteryx are not unique to fossils.

Might epigenetic play a role here? There is nothing in the world even remotely similar to the monotreme Duck-billed Platypus, but I'd be interested in how this creature fares with changing environments. I believe ICR may like to study how CET (continuous environment tracking) works in this animal

@solalflechelles1216

Жыл бұрын

What do you mean? Echidnas are pretty similar to the platypus. They too lay eggs, have electroreceptors in their beak, and produce milk in their fur.

the subtitles do not match the video they are from the previous on

@IsGenesisHistory

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you for letting us know! The subtitles have been corrected.

Archaeopteryx was indeed a perching bird and a very weird one at that, it’s a bird kind that no longer exist, a toothed bird if you will, just like how there are different whale kinds, there are different bird kinds, this is one that doesn’t exist anymore

So - Were bees created on day 5 or day 6? (I think honey bees are awesome.)

Platypus is an intermediate of many kinds but it's own kind

And Suger Gliders

Bible seem to indicate birds as we see them today, it never mentions giant lizards roaming the earth as scientist have been claiming and somehow changed into completely different creatures...I'm not gonna say they never existed but just seems odd it doesn't quite add up.

So, bird, what you are saying is that if you use the invisible thing which is everywhere present and gives us all life, you can be freed from being bound to the Earth and be lifted up to heaven where you can see all things clearly. I see your point.

Query: Is there a non-duck-billed platypus? If not, then it's a platypus. With a platypus' bill. NOT a duck's. Wordiness is not conducive to any reasonable transmission of information amongst humans. There! I said it!

Excellent production value and a winsome host, but overall an argument that disappoints. First, at 2:15, Dr. Wood seems to argue that, because “flight had one beginning” is simpler than “flight evolved four times”, that makes it more likely. (Replace “flight” with other things and you’ll see what I mean - is it more likely that the Beatles oeuvre was written by one person, because that would be simpler?) That doesn’t constitute strong evidence - and it makes an open-minded viewer wonder if that’s being said because there isn’t stronger evidence. Second, near the end, Dr. Wood asserts that Archaeopteryx should be understood as a composite animal. This is really interesting - going against a hundred years of how all sides have interpreted the animal. Interesting claims call for evidence, but none is given - making it feel like an argument from authority (i.e. “you can trust this guy, because he has a PhD”). I’m a science teacher, and I love to encourage my creationist students to get into the creation-evolution debate, because they’ll learn to think scientifically. I’m sorry that this is a video I’d only recommend to them to learn what good scientific argumentation doesn’t look like.

Chickens got wing claws too. Maybe it was just a chick!

In the pre-flood world there were the Nephilim, (the fallen ones) that went unto the daughters of men. The creation of hybrid humans. KJV translates these as giants, Raphaim the offspring of the Nephilim. Gen 6. Where all flesh was corrupted, the genome (DNA) was polluted with hybrids not of their kind, human and animal. Only Noah and his sons were perfect in their generations (genome). God sent the animals to Noah for the Arch, therefore none of the animals God sent were hybrids. The church is split on (Gen 6) due to thought embraced recent in church history are seen as the Sons of Seth as the Sons of God going unto the daughters of Cain. Ancient Rabbinical thought and the early church is fallen angels were the Sons of God, Nephilim of Gen 6. The Nephilim messed with all of God's creation and corrupted all flesh. This early church view is important to note. Jesus stated that just before he returns it will be like the days of Noah. Mat 24. Today we see the genome, DNA of all flesh "engineered' as a great "accomplishment". LOL Many contend Archaeopteryx is a hybrid fossil of Nephilim origin, and not a created kind.

@sherraleewoods3668

4 жыл бұрын

You've been listening to Chuck Missler haven't you.? Love Him

@lauriemclean1131

4 жыл бұрын

That is an interesting theory. It is quite troubling to know what types of horrible experiments are being done today with DNA and genetic engineering. People were a lot smarter back then and could learn a lot more given the much longer life spans. Maybe they were already doing those same abominable things in the time before Noah. It is mind boggling to imagine how grievous the sin for God to be sorry He created us and chose to destroy all except Noah's family. And indeed, our many sins are unbelievably grievous like that today.

@FilipCordas

4 жыл бұрын

Did actually read the part in genies about 'Nephilim'? This sounds like something your cult leader try's push to promote his 'teachings' only problem with non Christian cults the use the Bible you have to understand stuff about Christianity to understand passages like this, but please send more money to support your preacher cult's always need money.

@timhays4290

4 жыл бұрын

@@lauriemclean1131 Check out Steve Quayle, GenSix, or Dr MIchael S Heiser. It is a lot more than theory.

If global warming or climate change occurs and food becomes scarce with enough stress and time humans could sprout wings and fly because Darwin .

It’s a wingless bird with hairy feathers.

Dont forget Bumblee bee's and scarab beetles. They fly yes, but not according to physics. They defy physics with their flight. They fly using vibrations to free themselves from the electromagnetic field we live in that is wrongly identified as the force of gravity, thus achieving "zero gravity" and are able to move about as they wish.

Imagine if in 1,000 years only wolves still existed. Then imagine that someone found the skeletons of a Mastiff and a Chihuahua.

@pocadon

4 жыл бұрын

I would be horrified at what mutations can do to an animal (the chihuahua). If we were only going by sight I would be puzzled as to what it was, its purpose and how it survived. If the preservation was exquisite, I would wonder why the animal appeared to be clothed at one time. Sorry I didn't feel like picking on the Mastiff even though it would have a large number of genetic mutations as well. I just like big dogs.

@pocadon

4 жыл бұрын

@@mickhealy572 yeah we learned how much you actually know about science and reason every single time I schooled you. More arrogant, illogical and arbitrary remarks. You should really learn what you are talking about before you comment and probably learn what joking around is because besides the long list of your mental shortcomings I can now add ...has no sense of humor. Yes I agree with the person below you have not even exceeded internet troll...who is weirdly obsessed with creationism and things he does not believe in. Who is the weirdo? You, and you put it on display for everyone to see. Last comment because you are totally annoying and totally ignorant to just about everything.

Funny, how He made the "more advanced" flying creatures the day before the land creatures. 😉

The Hoatzins is a living bird with fully functional claws on its wings. There are humming birds with teeth in their mouths. Archaeopteryx is not an "intermediate" of any kind. It was a perching bird. Additionally, fully modern birds are found in the same layers or earlier than Archaeopteryx. You guys have such wonderful videos but the content of this one is wrong and disappointing.

@IsGenesisHistory

3 жыл бұрын

You may be confusing an "intermediate form" with a "transitional form." A transitional form is specifically an organism that exhibits traits of both an alleged ancestral group and its supposed derived descendant group. Whereas intermediate form is a more generic term which refers to organisms that exhibit traits of two other types of organisms, regardless of whether or not they are related. It is similar to the term "mosaic." Hence, Archaeopteryx and hoatzins are intermediates, but not not transitional forms.

Made from "leftover" components on Day 5. :)

YOU DEFINITELY SHOULDN'T USE MACHINE TRANSLATION FOR THE TITLE! IT PICKS THE WRONG ALTERNATIVE WITH AMBIGOUS VOCABULARY! A I ISN'T SO FAR YET ! "FLIGHT" HAS A DUAL MEANING.

@acrocanthos-maxima4504

3 жыл бұрын

What else does flight mean?

00:02:22 "...this is a lot easier to explain if God created the flying things and that's where flight came from...we don't have to think about that..." Nope. That's not an explanation, it's merely a story. To qualify as an explanation, it has to have at least some explanatory and predictive power, and it has neither. You might as well say that Allah did it, or Shiva, or pixies or something like that; all those stories have about the same predictive power, which is to say none, and that applies to the story in the Bible as well. And maybe you "dont' have to think about that", but many millions of humans do, and take such questions pretty seriously, too. 00:02:54 "...we obviously have a radical difference here between these two paradigms..." Creationism is by definition entirely opposed to science. So, yes. 00:03:09 "....in the creation model, you just have one origin..." Nope. There is no "creation model", because creationism has no methodology, no means of testing or measuring any of its claims, no objective standards by which its research can be judged, no peer-review process, no publications of note, nothing at all besides a completely unreasoning and unreasonable interpretation of one particular book of religion which conflicts with *other* popular interpretations of the same book. There is no "creation model". You might as well try to talk about a "magic model" or a "pixies did it model. It's silly. 00:03:28 "....possible multiple created kinds of birds..." I have asked at least two dozen creationists over the course of about twenty years for a rigorous, defensible, internally consistent definition for the word "kind" in this context, and not one of them was able to. I have also read up on creationist texts and watched some lectures, too, and none of *them* offer such a definition, either. So...what are you talking about? Meh...the rest of this just the usual creationist cruft, nothing but misrepresented science and lies. And it's so boring! No thanks, I have better things to do today....

@barclaygarnett2151

4 жыл бұрын

Evolution is a “faith” just the same. There is no evidence however unlike the design paradigm. Ever hear of the Fibonacci sequence? Face it, you would not believe God if he appeared in your bowl of corn flakes every day.

Look! If God wanted us to fly He would have given us a mind and sense of wonder to find a way to do it! So, quit this nonsense about flying! Said Leonardo's mother. Day Five and the Word spoke. And it was so: flying kinds. Next question?

It was a dinosaur ... like all actual living birds are too...

@STAR-RADIANCE

4 жыл бұрын

Jan Buysse yeah, that’s what someone said.

@Tzunamii777

4 жыл бұрын

@tsimahei Bingo. modern "science" has an agenda, investigate every conclusion they draw.

@pocadon

4 жыл бұрын

@tsimahei birds came the day before land dwelling creatures so if someone tries to shove evolution into creation they would actually have to devolve...in a day.

@pocadon

4 жыл бұрын

@tsimahei ahhh...misunderstanding. I apologize. I just use what the Bible says when confronting another worldview. Show them point by point why their way of thinking is inconsistent with what they proclaim. And yes once insults start getting hurled at you, you definitely won and should end the back and forth lest you look like a fool too. I think that is from Psalms. You probably know exactly what I'm speaking of. I'm too tired to look it up from my phone right now. God bless!

@janbuyck1

4 жыл бұрын

STAR : Nope! Can be proven