Am I the only one that waited to go to the bird house?

I could spend all day with your videos!

Dr. Todd Wood, You’re blessed, having the right doctrine, not being deceived by the world.

It was fitting to see this video at the Memphis Zoo, one of the best zoos in the country and a perfect backdrop for this conversation.

Definitely, natural selection is common sense, but one kind changing into a totally different kind is insane and we see the illogical BS from the devil for years

So good love it Now is the time to seek God like never before. I pray for those going through hard times, pain, depression, sickness to be healed and set free

@JamesRichardWiley

4 жыл бұрын

Why is god forcing hard times, pain, depression and sickness upon good people. Seems cruel to me.

@jt2097

4 жыл бұрын

@@JamesRichardWiley He's not forcing any bad times or pain on you. You are forcing it on yourself by turning your back on Him. If your dad tells you not to put your hand in the fire or you'll get burned and then you stick your hand in the fire.... Well it means you are a little bit silly and you'll get burned. It's no good blaming your dad, blame yourself.

@TS-jm7jm

4 жыл бұрын

@@jt2097 it is also worth pointing out that God said we would be persecuted and suffer for following him because the world justifies itself and hates God, hence when they reject us for what we say(when what we say is what God told us to) then it is not us but God who they hate persecute and reject, the man above is only interested in living a comfortable life and justifying himself

@willohulak2051

4 жыл бұрын

@@JamesRichardWiley Dr.Charles Stanley explains this very well in this video: kzread.info/dash/bejne/o4tsrK2Cfcazpbg.html

@jt2097

4 жыл бұрын

@@TS-jm7jm you gave me a bit of a start there... When you said 'The man above.' I first thought you were talking about God. I now realise that you meant the man who posted earlier, who was trying to blame anyone but himself for being in satan's world.

Thank you! Interesting, factual and honest reporting. Unique in out fallen world. God bless you both and your ministries.

As a technologist and researching the subject for 40+ years, I concur, those of us deep in the trenches do get special encouragement along the path despite the weight of opposition - a world of counter narrative and opposition. Story; In my journey sharing the pro-creation cause and Truth, a high-level geologist from a well known international company came to Christ in the process of friendship evangelism and a working relationship. This party was later promoted to a position where he was in charge of a major exploration effort. Before he began this project, he challenged the Lord, committing to follow the creation and flood model in allocating his sizable assets. Low and behold, his team came upon and discovered one of the largest Gold discoveries in the Western US, to the confounding of his peers. Russ Humphreys has shared the experience with yours truly in putting A & B together and predicting things. Amen! Mark Rose, author of The Noah Code.

From this whole series it seems that science is looking for an answer to "everything". As a Christian myself, that isn't what God wants for us. God yearns to have a personal relationship with each of us and to focus on Him alone. Yes, science is neat and exciting, but don't sweat over it.

@robertmitchell8728

3 жыл бұрын

That's a sweet sentiment on the surface. But, I think that makes it blind faith. Which is the blind leading the blind. I would say you can't really know God that way. If creation is his work, you don't think studing his work is going to tell you about God. His nature, or the purpose of his work. What if your religious teachers are mistaken about any key part. Then you will not know until it's too late. We are all supposed to be seeking the Truth for ourselves. The Book says you can find him everywhere you look. But you must be looking before he will reveal himself to you. I used to be a blind man, but now I can see. And I am amazed at what I am seeing.

Evolution teaches that all life evolved from a common source....(AKA abiogenesis). For that to be a fact with the massive amount of life forms observed, that first life must have diverged from one Domain, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species, to another Domain, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species. In order for all forms of life to have come from just one common ancestor it would require that this one source of life diverge, crossing all classification lines, even the big ones. We have observed and recorded life adapting to changing environmental conditions producing slight variations on the Species level. Some even refusing to or incapable of interbreeding again. But never has anybody ever recorded a change at or above the Family or Genus level. To say that it is a fact and that this has actually happened is disingenuous...It is nothing but a speculation not an observable scientific fact. It is an assumption required to support the theory that all life evolved from a common ancestor and nothing more. To farther compound the problem evolution theory itself says that these larger inter Family or inter Phylum changes would require millions of years and millions of generations to take place and so could never be observed to begin with. In fact even after years of forced mutation on viruses and fruit flies the only changes observed have been extremely slight, nothing that could be construed as Evolution beyond Species or Genus. The branches of the "Tree Of Life" and the names that have been given presented by academia indicating the ancestors of one organism transforming into another are unseen speculations invented by man to help organize and classify individual life forms and nothing more. The cross phylum transitions presented within the "Tree Of Life" charts are speculations, not observed facts. POINTING TO THE REMAINS OF AN ORGANISM BURIED UNDER LAYERS OF SEDIMENTARY STRATA AND PROCLAIMING THAT IT IS THE PROGENY OF ANOTHER DIFFERENT ORGANISM BERRIED FARTHER DOWN IN ANOTHER LAYER OF STRATA IS CALLED AN ASSUMPTION. NOT A FACT. The descendancy proposed between different fossils is in itself nothing but an assumption.......Let’s look at an example. Evolutionary proponents find the fossilized remains of an animal in a layer of strata, (let's call it animal "A") then they find the fossilized remains of another animal in another layer of strata (let's call this one animal "B"). It is clear to even a fifth grader that "A" and "B" are not of the same species, genus or even family. But to support evolutionary theory that all life came from a common source it is speculated that "A" is a descendant of" "B. Then the proponents of evolutionary theory use this speculated assumption of descendancy as the very basis of their entire theological construct. And will even go so far as to use this assumed descendancy as a proof for that very assumed descendancy. You can't use your assumption as a proof for your assumption. This would be called a fallacy; the fallacy of circular reasoning or begging the question. But for some reason those in scientific circles have no problem ignoring this obvious fallacy. It is clear that there are vast evolutionary variations within groups (AKA groups like...Canines, Felines, Bovines, Malacostraca, Cephalopods... ) and there is ample evidences for this very limited part of the evolutionary theory. But the only thing connecting these vastly different groups as well as the fossils of "A" to "B" as in the example given above is their assumptions..... There is no observed descendancy between these groups, no DNA to test in the case of extinct examples, just a bias assumption required to support their narrative that all life diverged from a common ancestor. When asked to give evidence for the myriad of cross genus and cross family events that they say took place the only evidence they ever give are examples of the variations within their respective groups or their own unobserved speculated assumptions of cross family descendancy. So ...Is evolution (all life evolving from a single common source) a settled scientific fact based on verifiable observable evidences or a belief in their unobserved assumptions of descendancy? If cross taxon events have indeed taken place then please show us one that has been observed. I have never met anybody with more believe in the unseen then an atheist/evolutionist.

@jt2097

4 жыл бұрын

G spotter, you are 100% correct.

@wesbihn3435

4 жыл бұрын

Are your hands tired after typing all that?

Random mutations don't generally 'do nothing' they almost invariably degrade the genome and if you accumulate enough 'do nothing' mutations you wind up being 'selected' for extinction. You can see this with dogs. mutations that individually appear harmless and perhaps even beneficial when combined over years render many specimen incapable of survival without human intervention and only fit for extinction. That's planned mutations with a known outcome, imagine random, unplanned mutations over millions of years with no forethought or regard for outcomes and it's self apparent this could not have resulted in a single viable species, let alone the diverse proliferation of life on earth. Also, even a 'neutral' mutation in the first generation will be a major degradation by the 1000th generation, as anyone that has laid a single brick askew in a foundation knows, you quickly lose fidelity and it gets worse the further along you go. There really is no such thing as a 'neutral' genetic mutation.

@jt2097

4 жыл бұрын

Yaay Leroy! The truth is finally being spoken. Thank you.

@leroybrown9143

4 жыл бұрын

@@jt2097 it's appalling that anybody could be so weak minded and willfully stupid as to believe evolution. It is self evident that it's a hoax.

@truthbebold4009

4 жыл бұрын

@@mickhealy572 How is it that the platypus prove evolution? I'll have to check that out...

@achristfollowingturnbullma8237

4 жыл бұрын

The brick that was laid askew was the beginning of a curve

This channel is a miracle

I'm searching stuff about Creation vs Evolution from last 10+ years. And I got There always a Designer and that Designer is God Lord Jesus Christ.

@ereynatetasgrafas9933

3 жыл бұрын

Amen!!!

the theological implications of Noah’s Ark led to the development of the concept of species in biology. It’s fascinating how religious narratives intersected with scientific inquiry!

So, the original created kinds on the ark gave rise to all the different species we have today, makes sense. I mean they all had their beginnings so why not on the ark? I have had arguments where people are saying all the millions of species we have today couldn't have fit on the ark and you are right because we didn't have all this diversity we see today.

It was science that brought me to Christ..... End of argument!

@JamesRichardWiley

4 жыл бұрын

Why does Christ in his infinite love and compassion fail to end the suffering and despair of his beloved creatures. He could if he wanted to.

@bugnfront

4 жыл бұрын

@@JamesRichardWiley I assume you are asking to really want to know...A couple answers for you...1. He knows the whole picture and knows the best resolve for every situation to bring in the best for every situation. Can a ant understand anything beyond it's natural instinct ...music, compassion, art or science..of course not, so it can not see them even though they do exist! Can we know beyond ours...God knows them. We are finite, we know a limited amount of knowledge, God has infinant knowledge....Faith is understanding that there is something beyond our limited knowledge as in the ant analogy....God will however, remove evil..His word say so, He does have a plan to restore what man ruined...we understand time differently to God as a ant to does to us....faith demands we look beyond ourselves in and our view of the world....if we do....we will see the hand of God...in perfect action!

@STAR-RADIANCE

4 жыл бұрын

Science doesn’t reveal who Jesus is. So science is useless in that regard.

@jt2097

4 жыл бұрын

@@STAR-RADIANCE science doesn't reveal anything, people reveal things using science. Science simply means knowledge. By the same token people can not use science to prove Darwinian evolution, they can only use speculation, use evidence to build a story they would like to be true.

@jt2097

4 жыл бұрын

@@JamesRichardWiley Jesus is in heaven with His Father where people are nice. When He came here to try to save whoever He could we nailed Him to a cross. We decided we would rather follow satan, the prince of this world. If you don't like this world blame satan, and yourself for choosing him.

Only a few types of creatures, as compared to the myriad of those still in existence, can change their colors at will as in camouflage for self-preservation. A fish does not think, "I want to fly, but have to develop wings to do that with, so here we go." Nope. Drastic changes don't happen because they want or need to make such happen. God can make changes happen for certain creatures to survive, if He so desires to. I agree there are no cross migration occurring among the different species to create a completely different kind of creature. I like the multiple tree of species liked to an orchard or forest to explain the different animal types and species that once were and what now is. Many creatures that exist today IMHO existed before the Flood. Part of the kinds of animals we have today is due to animals undergoing tailored breeding by man in order to make a dog look a certain way, as mentioned in another interview. However, Transitional and Intermediary development do exist at the same time to a certain degree, but not in any way that dramatically changes a creature to being something different. We have Spider Monkeys v. Baboons or Humans v. Gorillas, Cows v. Deer, Snakes v. other non-legged Reptiles, Sharks v. Hammerheads for instance. Nearly all land animal share similarities with one another, but that doesn't make us connected with another species. Just saying, not criticizing.

Would you prefer to fall asleep knowing, or wondering?

I liked the video, but, seriously, do you think you could use the word paradigm more often?

We talk about creation as fact, but with evaluation it is only a theory genetic change is in all life, look at dogs and the changes that man has made to the breed changes

@JamesRichardWiley

4 жыл бұрын

Creationism is a failed hypothesis. Evolution (change) is a theory. A theory is an hypothesis that has not been proven false, so far.

@leroybrown9143

4 жыл бұрын

Even with the application of planned mutations through human intellect dogs are still just dogs. More telling, dogs are all degradations from the source, meaning they are all genetically less than the original, not more. They are less than due to mutation, not greater than. Even with the application of a mind no novel genetic information has been added to the canine genome. Moreover, you cannot get back to the model state. You can't make a boxer back into a wolf. Mutations, planned ones, let alone random ones, degrade and destroy, they do not build, not even the so called 'beneficial' mutations.

@leroybrown9143

4 жыл бұрын

@@JamesRichardWiley evolution has been repeatedly demonstrated to be false. Nice try though.

@smashexentertainment676

4 жыл бұрын

@@leroybrown9143 "evolution has been repeatedly demonstrated to be false" only by creationists who prospers from religion.

No matter how you explain the workings of Nature god did it.

He doesn't believe in the origin of species but he believe that a kind can evolve within it's kind

@GSpotter63

4 жыл бұрын

That is what the evidence shows.... There is no evidence of cross phylum evolution, just their assumptions that it took place.

@zorot3876

4 жыл бұрын

Possible variation is built into the DNA to begin with. To call this evolution is misleading.

@jt2097

4 жыл бұрын

@@zorot3876 species can adapt within their gene pool, or gene library they are now calling it because it is a literal code. Selections can never be taken from what doesn't already exist. Darwinian evolution is impossible.

@zorot3876

4 жыл бұрын

@@jt2097 Completely agree.

@libertyresearch-iu4fy

4 жыл бұрын

Speaking of the "origin of species" that is never explained by evolutionists. By that, I mean where did the amoeba or the matter for the big bang come from? Modern atheists choose to ignore that question completely.

Hey, I was taugh absolutly nothing exploded. lol. Get it? Of coarse not, nobody did. lol. I did it again.

Every mutation observed by man has been a loss of information. An error the DNA could not correct. Are Christians "The House of Jacob"? Luke 1:33 And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end. Ephesians 2:12 That at that time ye were without Messiah, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: The reason I ask is there is a phrase, almost identical to His length of reign that applies to the House of Jacob. .Exodus 31:13 Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, Verily my sabbaths ye shall keep: for it is a sign between me and you throughout your generations; that ye may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctify you. 14 Ye shall keep the sabbath therefore; for it is holy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death: for whosoever doeth any work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people. 15 Six days may work be done; but in the seventh is the sabbath of rest, holy to the Lord: whosoever doeth any work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death. 16 Wherefore the children of Israel shall keep the sabbath, to observe the sabbath throughout their generations, for a perpetual covenant. 17 It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever: for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed. "Jacob for ever" "shall be no end" "for a perpetual covenant." " It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever" Did He lie? Was He wrong? Oh that's Old Testament? First off the Messiah said it Himself that not a word would change until *_ALL_* is finished. If you have been deceived into thinking "it is finished" is what He is talking about, He has yet to defeat death, resurrect, and ascend to heaven. And has He come back with a flaming sword looking for pork eaters yet? So not *_ALL_* has been finished. Because it says that to know Him, or know if anyone else does.... 1 John 2:3 And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. 4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. 5 But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him. 6 He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked. Which commandments? NEXT PAGE. 1 John 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the Torah*: for sin is the transgression of the Torah*. 5 And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin. 6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him. 7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous. 8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. * Torah does not mean "law". It is a translation error. Torah in Hebrew means " *_THE INSTRUCTIONS_* . What if you continue to violate the Torah? No grace. Hebrews 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, 27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. 28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: 29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. Pray about it. Proverbs 28: He that turneth away his ear from hearing the Torah, even his prayer shall be abomination. A "Christian" is someone who follows a "christ". What will you do they day the Holy Spirit shows you the word christ comes from a Greek word, khristos, that used to be used for Hades, Zeus, and could tecnically be used for satan, which makes it ironic to call him the anti-christ, as he is someone who fits the definition of a christ. There many christs. It is a common title meaning "anointed one". So, Matthew, Mark, Luke and both John's. I used to say Peter, Paul and Mary, but her name is Miriam, not Mary. They were all anointed ones. Does "Christianity", (Judaism and Islam also) obey or violate Deuteronomy 4:2? Does any of the three pass the Deuteronomy 13 test? No. Only the House of Jacob, the real one. Not the one built by Judah on the kingdom of Judah's land which calls itself Israel, to deceive. Do you celebrate easter? Ezekiel 8. Weeping for Tammuz. The birth of Tammuz , since Babylon, has been celebrated on winter solstice. The true Messiah was born Tishri 2, 3759. Late summer. (sept 11th 3 B.C.) Today is Odin's day in Babylon. Tomorrow Thors day, and thenext, Frigga day. Odin and Frigga had a daughter name Hel. She is the god over hell. Mars, jupiter and saturn don't exist, outside of pagansim. Their creator calls the wandering stars and does not name them. In fact the only thing He names is the Sabbath day of rest, which Cathoilic/Christianity spits on. What was the Catholic priest Martin Luther *protesting* ;) It wasn't sun-day worship doctrine or the fact they replaced Passover with easter a pagan fertility rite.

@JamesRichardWiley

4 жыл бұрын

Why do you believe a flood of quotations from ancient Hebrew texts proves anything? Just because I record my Hebrew tribal thoughts on parchment or animal skins does not make it true.

@jt2097

4 жыл бұрын

@@JamesRichardWiley but it wouldn't make it untrue either. Could you show they had motive to lie?

@mrchrysler9736

4 жыл бұрын

​@@JamesRichardWiley King David was a real man. A person. A living breathing person proven by science to have existed. So now you have to wrestle with the " *_WHY_* " they mixed in stories of giants? These were some seriously anally retentive people. And why would you care? I am clearly not addressing people who lie to themselves about the existence of the 4th dimension and 4th dimensional beings. I am clearly addressing people who believe, but like yourself, accepted lies in the place of truth. I'm dead serious. Why are you here? You seem set in your beliefs. So why would you come here? Do I find a bunch of snarky bovine excrement as you attempt to pick weak ones from the herd for your master? What would drive you to watch a video about creation and then pick a comment meant solely for believers? And with such a weak argument. After reading all that, you came to the conclusion you could take a stab at me and then run away unscathed? Must be an anti-theist who thinks he/she is an atheist. No logic. Or a broken logic. Ask and I will explain the difference.

Guinea fowl!

At some point for evolution,was man this🦎or this🐛. You think I'm joking?

@achristfollowingturnbullma8237

4 жыл бұрын

God created man after each kind was created so, no

Oh I forgot. You have class 1 mutant. What's her name Dr. Jean Grey. Roflmao Tell her. I will be shaking the heavens. If she's what she claims then join me. Roflmao Otherwise like everyone. You are going over the moon. Roflmao

I knew the day will come when evolution deniers will have to accept that at least partial evolution is a fact. Like when church had to switch from geocentric system to heliocentric.

@leroybrown9143

4 жыл бұрын

Well, the term 'evolution' is now so grossly broad it encompasses every notion out there. Limit it to Darwin's notion of novel life forms arising from natural selection acting on random mutations over millions of years and the 'prophesy' of creation deniers about 'partial evolution' loses its legs doesn't it? Adaptation is common knowledge and universally observed, evolution is never observed. Because it's a hoax.

@jt2097

4 жыл бұрын

Evolution deniers have always accepted natural selection. What we deny is that random mutation can magically create new, more complex life forms when in fact mutation causes disease, aging and death.

@smashexentertainment676

4 жыл бұрын

@@jt2097 "random mutation can magically create new, more complex life forms when in fact mutation causes disease, aging and death." can you give a couple examples.

@leroybrown9143

4 жыл бұрын

@@smashexentertainment676 malaria and sickle cell disease. Malaria mutates tens of millions of individuals each year, each of them has a trillion cells, not a single innovation has ever been observed of malaria mutations 'evolving' a novel feature or new species of human OR 'simple' malaria bacteria, as each life form acts on the other. Individuals with sickle cell have a SINGLE mutation that grants them partial resistance to malaria, but sickle cell is itself a fatal mutation that if everyone carried will lead to extinction in just a few generations, that's from a single 'beneficial' genetic mutation. Now imagine the thousands of genetic mutations needed to make a land mammal into a whale, all of which would need to be 'advantageous or harmless' mutations over millions of years and see if logic can bear the absurdity of this ever having happened. As stated, wherever observed, mutation causes genetic degradation and death, it doesn't grant superpowers anywhere but comic books and the imaginations of darwinist. We observe the accumulation of 'neutral' mutations every day, it's called aging, and it leads to the inevitable extinction of every living thing on earth. Life was not designed to mutate.

What makes this creationist push on despite being in the minority? Answer: Cognitive dissonance

Poor Dr. Todd Wood, trying to align his data model with a book written by desert goat herders living in tents approximately 3000 years ago, who had no concept of biology, must require a lot of mental gymnastics.

@robertmitchell8728

3 жыл бұрын

You mean like nothing exploded into the universe, right? Or do you mean, our carbon based planet is being destoyed by carbon? Or, are you refering to soft tissue surviving over 100 million years? Or how our polution is heating up the whole universe? lol. Did you know that's how many discoveries have been made? By looking at old historical text? Like the city of Troy, which the so called experts of the time thought was nothing but a fable. That sounds familiar. I don't have all the answers, but I try to keep an open mind. And I find many theories quite interesting, even if I don't BELIEVE they are true. Like aliens, I don't think they're out there. but, who real knows. Science so far says no, But, they could find new evidence.