In my youth (not yet a believer in The Gospel of Jesus Christ) I also loved biology, (both the study of plant & animal life). NOW as a believer for many decades I love these subjects even more knowing that they were created by The GOD of Jacob (from nothing) & revealing at the same time the awesomeness of HIS imagination, HIS power, & HIS glory. I have no doubt that what we see in the heavens & the earth now only begins to scratch the surface of what HE is capable of. Keep sharing HIS Truths as long as possible. VIA CON DIOS.

@gifted14sho

3 жыл бұрын

Amen!

@j.whisper2379

3 жыл бұрын

@The S Word! And you did this all by yourself! No one needs a god! Only the ability to think freely!

@j.whisper2379

3 жыл бұрын

@Yeshua's Words! As soon as I can find him, I will be sure to ask him! The bible was written by men who were subject to ignorance and superstition! There is no other evidence! Religion is dead and dying in most of the developed and intelligent world! Most of the western world has rejected it, it still thrives in places like Africa and in your mind!

@j.whisper2379

3 жыл бұрын

@Yeshua's Words! There is no evidence for a god, but that doesn't mean he is real! LOL!

@lorrainewhitehead9080

3 жыл бұрын

@@j.whisper2379 He thrives in my soul, that’s how I know He is real. I know He is. I feel He is. I don’t need to see or hear Him to know He exists. I will pray for you J. Whisper to come to know Him one day too. 🙏🏽🙏🏻✝️

So far, I find nothing to disagree with in this series, whether referring to biology, geography, or chemistry.

@midlander4

3 жыл бұрын

And your area of professional expertise is exactly what, Angel?

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

@@ozowen5961 instead of submitting derision and mockery, try giving examples.

We always think Noah's animals were adults, but they could have been young animals. This would take up less space and less food, and would make some species less threatening. Baby lions are not much of a problem.

@marcusmuse4787

Жыл бұрын

I read that elephants don't fully mature until 15 years.

@Youdidnthearme

5 ай бұрын

Or it could be all mythology

@jefffinkbonner9551

3 ай бұрын

Exactly plus many of the animals could have hibernated for much of the time

1 Timothy 4:4-5 “For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, because it is consecrated by the word of God and prayer.” 💖✝️💖 Hallelujah Praise the Lord our God for he is so so so good!!

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

people use that out of context as an excuse to ignore God's commands against eating animals not made for human consumption.

@rogerherron7718

3 жыл бұрын

Satan is good?

@darkeen42

2 жыл бұрын

Matt Casey in that case you should have a second helping of arsenic. I found God created the Black Death that was pretty cool. All those people dying cuz the Bible couldn't explain simply how germs work and how to prevent contagions

@HS-zk5nn

2 жыл бұрын

@@eduardojones6411 God doesnt condone slavery rape and the killing of your own child. and neither of burnt flesh. looks like you need to reread the Bible.

@HS-zk5nn

2 жыл бұрын

it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because science.

The "Kind" was a lot more healthy than today's animals and also had great DNA diversity potential. Over time those animals that come from the Kind reduce in genetic potential and some "Kinds" are likely extinct. So we have less potential and not more.

@j.whisper2379

Жыл бұрын

And there were a lot more "kind" to fit into the Ark! LOL!

Very good. Most people just don't know how very complex a single cell organism is.

@HS-zk5nn

2 жыл бұрын

it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because science.

Learning about epigenetics while I was in college blew my mind. I hadn't heard of it in high school.

@josephscala6707

3 жыл бұрын

and there's a reason for that...

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

The sins of the fathers shall be on the sons for several generations of those that despise Me... Those that love God can break the chain of automatic physical and spiritual curses when they obey His commands from concerning diet to spiritual matters.

@ereynatetasgrafas9933

3 жыл бұрын

@@josephscala6707 amen

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

It's like subnet masking, for the computer networking inclined.

@eugeneprewittforieat5073

2 жыл бұрын

@David Davison hi David. The Bible explicitly denies that children are published for the sins of their father (Ezekiel 18:1-20). But it does affirm that parents pass on moral qualities to their children, including weakness. This isn't punishment, but is the law of heredity.

About 7:00, talking about the genome mixing, he's either forgetting or doesn't know yet, but, DNA isn't just a code on a ladder, it's folded in on itself and where it's next to another place of the ladder creates another dimension of coding for different changes, the same ladder of DNA can produce a different look or reveal a hidden trait just by folding a different way at a specific place in the strand.

A video like - "What were the Original Humans God Created Really Like?" would be fascinating. We know that the Earth had a very different atmosphere/pressure/oxygen content, (which how dinosaurs and insects were so large). Examining how that environment would affect people would be so interesting.

@j.whisper2379

3 жыл бұрын

GreaseMan! LOL! Homo Sapiens have been around for only about 2 hundred thou years ago! The earth is about 4.5 billion years old! How do you explain that?!

@rogerherron7718

3 жыл бұрын

@@j.whisper2379 yes humans as we know them have been around for 200k, roughly. But the species we evolved from are much older.

@j.whisper2379

3 жыл бұрын

@@rogerherron7718! I did say Homo Sapiens, not Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus or the Australopithecines or the myriad of other ancestors and cousins of modern man denied by creationists!

@j.whisper2379

3 жыл бұрын

@@paradiseaaron! What do you consider human! Homo Neanderthal, Denosovan, and maybe a few others were considered pretty much human, along with Homo Sapiens. These were amongst the first humans accepted by the reality of science. None of these lived a million years ago! The earth at that time was not much different than today. We survived through the ice age climate changes of the last 50,000 years or so. There were no humans when the insects were large or there were dinosaurs! Unless you believe the bible. Then all bets are off! LOL!

@j.whisper2379

3 жыл бұрын

@@paradiseaaron! And who might your real scientists be?? 90% of all scientists who specialize in Biology, Paleontology, Geology believe what I say. I doubt that the state cares to much what you believe in this regard!

10:45_11:00🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️ he kept it so authentic God bless this man🙏🏾🙏🏻🙏🙏🏿

@darkeen42

2 жыл бұрын

I guess by telling the oldest lies after we've learned they are completely not true I guess is authentic.

Guest today is so enthusiastic about this topic! He loves it! So Awesome 👏🏻

What a great series...

@GerryMoningkey

3 жыл бұрын

agreed!

@jerrymoore838

2 жыл бұрын

Agree

Watching this channel and the proof of intelligent design with a purpose. How can other " so-called" scientists explain away proof. That's not science.

@toomanyhobbies2011

3 жыл бұрын

@David Davison Whereas it's true that these folks don't present proof and only share their opinions, that's not a reason to put others down.

@HS-zk5nn

2 жыл бұрын

it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because science.

I love this series. I'm teaching science and apologetics right now, and this kind of resource is amazingly valuable. Thank you!

@sodaht2296

3 жыл бұрын

Science and religion does not mix. What you're teaching in pseudoscience, and that's very dishonest of you

@danielschwegler5220

3 жыл бұрын

Poor kids

@timothyramirez6487

3 жыл бұрын

@@sodaht2296 you’re pseudoscience

@sodaht2296

3 жыл бұрын

@@timothyramirez6487 Iam pseudoscience? Ok? Is genesis history is absolutely pseudoscience :)

@timothyramirez6487

3 жыл бұрын

@@sodaht2296 maybe I’m pseudoscience....

Great discussion. Thanks!

I just did find AND ORDER the complete set of interviews AND the feature film on Blu-ray! THANK YOU!!!

The original animals and Adam and Eve had all the genetic traits we see today.

Your videos are so fascinating that I can't put them down even to answer the phone! Please keep up this wonderful offering of insight to those of us who have not studied these things. Godspeed.

@spatrk6634

3 жыл бұрын

they are lying to you. its amazing how much, shameless lies they present in every single video. i watch this for laughs. they dont do science, they are doing pseudoscience

@gerrymoningkey5298

3 жыл бұрын

@@spatrk6634 they all have PhD in their respective field. One of them got his MA and PhD in paleontology from Harvard University. Do you have any?

@spatrk6634

3 жыл бұрын

@@gerrymoningkey5298 they are all creationist. not scientists. deal with it

@gerrymoningkey5298

3 жыл бұрын

@@spatrk6634 They're all scientists with PhD. Deal with it

@spatrk6634

3 жыл бұрын

@@gerrymoningkey5298 they are not doing science friend. i know reality hurts your religious views. but these videos are pseudoscience. cheers

Excellent discussion!

Staggering how Great God is ❤❤❤ Thank you Men❤

Actually Genesis 7:2 said he should take every "Clean animal" by sevens, and unclean by 2, so more than just 2 Cats.

@ronhansen8471

3 жыл бұрын

Tim Orean said:Actually Genesis 7:2 said he should take every "Clean animal" by sevens, and unclean by 2, so more than just 2 Cats. Ron's response: There is estimated to be upwards of two (2) million species on this planet. Approximately 60 percent of these are insects; about 24,000 are amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals of which about 10,000 are birds, 9,000 are reptiles and amphibians and only 5,000 mammals, including whales and porpoises. Some researchers estimate there are only about 300 species of land mammals larger than sheep and about 1,400 species smaller than rats. CLEAN ANIMALS: Every creature that splits hoof, forming a cleft therein, and chews cud; Everything in the waters that has fins and scales Insects and winged swarming creatures that go upon all fours and have leaper legs: migratory locust, edible locust, cricket, and grasshopper (all according to their kinds) UNCLEAN ANIMALS: Animals: camel, rock badger, hare, pig , fish and other swarming creatures in the water that have no fins or scales, Birds and flying creatures: eagle, osprey, black vulture, red kite, black kite, glede, raven, ostrich, owl, gull, falcon, little owl, long-eared owl, swan, pelican, vulture, cormorant, stork, heron, hoopoe, bat, any winged swarming creature that goes on all fours (that is, having locomotion in the manner of animals that walk on four legs). The factors determining which flying creatures were designated ceremonially “unclean” are not expressly stated in the Bible. While most of the “unclean” birds were birds of prey or scavengers, not all of them were. Unclean animals would be swarming creatures on the earth such as mole rat, Jerboa, lizard, gecko fanfoot, large lizard, newt, sand lizard, chameleon, any creature that goes upon the belly, on all fours, or on any great number of feet

@timorean320

3 жыл бұрын

@@ronhansen8471 I appreciate your dissertation/explanation, but it wasnt needed. I was not confirming, or denying any claim made by book, just correcting an error that most assume, because they fail to read what is actually claimed.

@darkeen42

2 жыл бұрын

And then they killed all those extra animals. Because that makes sense

@ronhansen8471

2 жыл бұрын

@@darkeen42 no they did not kill all the extra animals. Any air breathing animal not in the ark that could not sustain themselves in an ocean of water died.

@darkeen42

2 жыл бұрын

@@ronhansen8471 no there were 7 of every "clean" animal to be sacrificed after the ark landed. That's the kind of problem when your Bible constantly contradicts itself there's two completely contradictory accounts of Genesis in the Bible and four contradictory accounts of the Resurrection. You should really read your Bible cover to cover some day and not just the bits and pieces your preacher is comfortable with

We have to remember God in his infinite wisdom knew what he was getting ready to do to the earth. These pairs of animals came to Noah to get on the ark. so, God in his infinite wisdom may have modified these animals to recreate the earth as he wanted it to be going forward. I mean it's not like God didn't have a plan. LOL

Good work

💖✝️💖 God bless you all

I often am amazed at how many life forms there are on the earth. I never doubted where they came from. But what I can't figure out is very smart people have their eyes closed. If we evolved from animals, there should be a LOT of dead animals that are part man, part beast. For many thousand years woman would have had to wonder if her baby will be a human or part ape. Many animals would have died because their animal babies would have had an animals blood. Her body would have aborted it. Things hatched from eggs would out grow their shells. Do many failures with the evolution theory..

@darkeen42

Жыл бұрын

Lol u have no idea how evolution works or the fossils we have found

@darkeen42

Жыл бұрын

You demonstrate your ignorance very well

Very Likable guy. Good stuff

Exactly... animals and indeed people adapt not evolve.

The Russian foxes began to grow *curly tails* - a very un-foxlike trait and one that was not being selected for but which many domesticated dogs have.

@rubiks6

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 - I'm just an armchair scientist capable of reading just as you are. You can read for yourself the stories and reports of these Russian fox experiments and confirm the things I said. It doesn't a geneticist to understand the reports. Even ordinary folk can understand them. Maybe even you.

@rubiks6

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 - Is that really all you have? Weak insults. You, sir, are truly pathetic. Go do some bong hits and stay off the internet. Sheesh. Really, dude - is your Oculus headset broken?

@davidthurston5455

2 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 wow, youtube bullying...now that's sad

Living in Australia, we have some pretty unique kinds of animals 😆

@georgebond7777

3 жыл бұрын

Especially the Platypus and Echidna.

@zealheals

3 жыл бұрын

Sure do!

@LouisaWatt

3 жыл бұрын

@@hansdemos6510 those “weirdo critters” are perfectly adapted to the extreme climate, terrain and plant life across the continent, so I doubt that would happen by accident or “evolution” as you call it.

@georgebond7777

3 жыл бұрын

@@hansdemos6510 adaptation is not evolution.

@georgebond7777

3 жыл бұрын

@@hansdemos6510 changes in allele frequencies in a population over time is a fancy way of saying MICRO VARIATIONS, funny thats exactly what we OBSERVE, no rock soup to einstein there. You seem to have swallowed the equivocation fallacy. I'll wait .....

Adaptation explains it all.

@darkeen42

2 жыл бұрын

Adoption over large periods of time is called evolution. It's like saying walking 5 miles a day is completely possible but walking 25 miles in a week is impossible

@vgovger4373

2 жыл бұрын

@@darkeen42 Uh okay, so you are conceding that its all adaptation and nothing more? We have no evidence of any one "kind" changing into another "kind". We only know that life can adapt in the here and now.

@darkeen42

2 жыл бұрын

@@vgovger4373 what do you think evidence means?

@darkeen42

2 жыл бұрын

@@vgovger4373 you have to ignore some much of reality to beeline what you do. Why you are holding back humanity with your intentional ignorance. You should go live in the dark ages Christianity created and get out of the modern world of you don't believe the knowledge that created it.

@vgovger4373

2 жыл бұрын

@@darkeen42 give me one example of changing to a different "kind"...that can be observed?

Having studied biology and psychology in college eventually made me come to terms with my fundamentalist Christian beliefs. Listening to this discussion makes me glad I did. Like Kurt Wise, Todd has made a deal with the creationist, young Earth devil that no matter how true the scientific evidence is for a very old Earth, he will not change his views because he's afraid of disagreeing with an old sectarian manuscript that he was taught to believe by other deluded people. 🙄

the idea behind particular traits coming out when they are needed is actually how I was taught animal evolution from the different 'eras' in the 80's. The sizes even went small when there was less oxygen because a small mammal requires less, and as the atmosphere became more oxygenated by plant life the mammals got bigger. thats just how I learned it. I remember watching the films in science class about the horse specifically because we had horses. It might have been discovery way back in the 90's... LOL um - arent meer cats actually in the weasel family?

Rabbits, bears, wolves, etc. I can agree with as cases of species adaptation after the flood from one kind. Cats , however, do not appear to be the case. Therefore, I suspect there may have been more than two kinds of cat upon the ark.

@acrocanthos-maxima4504

3 жыл бұрын

That’s interesting, could you evaluate?

@acrocanthos-maxima4504

3 жыл бұрын

@@curbroadshow who said it was 150 feet?

@acrocanthos-maxima4504

3 жыл бұрын

@@curbroadshow Oh I understand now. You made a typo with the 150. Makes sense. I forgot about the cubit measurements so thanks

@acrocanthos-maxima4504

3 жыл бұрын

@@curbroadshow It is a very interesting subject that I’d like to test in real life. But maybe on a smaller scale

@acrocanthos-maxima4504

3 жыл бұрын

@@curbroadshow lol

I think its good to understanding genetics but I do believe scientists should not step over certain lines and that they should not try to be God or act like gods

@amisoftau2659

3 жыл бұрын

Agree. I think the line is that we should not seek to modify or "enhance" God's designs. These designs are God's work and therefore perfect. So that anything that man does to modify them will be a degradation. GMO crops are the perfect example of what NOT to do. Christians should avoid consuming them at all costs.

@amisoftau2659

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 "transitional species on the course of ongoing evolutionary processes currently" No, Evolutionism is by this stage a completely failed theory and religion. We're still on baby steps in comprehending the huge complexities of the designs of life together with their millions of symbiotic interdependencies, but already the kindergarten concept of "design via random mutation" is completely DEAD.. absolutely impossible in the world that we DO observe around us.

@amisoftau2659

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 "so I can actually do the work of digging into this myself" Lol you haven't studied it yet? "you ha e no clue what evolution is by calling it "evolutionism"" What are you talking about? If you have something to say please say it. Otherwise you're just wasting everyone's time. "Not all observation is accurate, is the Earth flat?" Don't be silly. Intelligent observation requires us to use our brains. We've been over that already. The earth does NOT appear to be flat when observed at relevent scale from a suitable position. Without honesty in your arguments and logic Tyrion, you'll never deduct the truth. Next you'll be telling us that black is white, or that murdering children BEFORE birth is morally RIGHT. "transitional species on the course of ongoing evolutionary processes currently" No. Evolutionism is by this stage a completely failed theory and religion. We're still on baby steps in comprehending the huge complexities of the designs of life together with their millions of symbiotic interdependencies, but already the kindergarten concept of "design via random mutation" is completely DEAD.. absolutely impossible in the world that we DO observe around us.

I thought foxes were separate from dogs/wolves? Dogs are canis and foxes are vulpis. Isn't that two different kinds? Curious.

That “not Cat” reminds me of a raptor, mini dinosaur?!!!!

Our God is an awesome God! Praise him in the name of Jesus Christ!

When animators first created computer based characters they programmed the character like woody in toy story. As programmers got better, in later films like lord of the rings they programmed orks so that the computer could make an army of different looking orks with variations but all looking like some sort of ork.

@spliter88

10 ай бұрын

We also use genetic algorithms to create ecosystems, and simulate evolution of various traits.

We were not there at Noah's Ark. The Flood may have been a Local event, or a Global event. In history of the earth there were many huge catastrophes.

Birds. Love Birds. I have lots of Wild Ravens

Modern biology as a science is stuck in a rut called 'emergence'. The presupposition of emergence is a product of human literary imagination.

@sf55514

3 жыл бұрын

It is amazing to me that this Supreme ever lasting Creator GOD, who is Supreme in every way every aspect, wants to visit with us and is interested in every part of us. To be in HIS presence is everything at once. Powerful yet when HE picks us up and holds us one feels surrounded by love like being bathed in love complete whole love.

@toomanyhobbies2011

3 жыл бұрын

Which is what these guys do. They're presenting their opinions and driving Christians apart by being so extra-Biblical.

As asked the last time when discussing kinds, please name three animals that are original created kinds that have no ancestors.

@Globeguy1337

3 жыл бұрын

Can you rephrase? Sounds interesting, but the question is unclear, and the direct interpretation I take from it seems a bit confused.

@cousinbryan3007

3 жыл бұрын

As stated in this video, the created kind were made with a wide range of genetic diversity. Thus, ANY population would produce a wide variety of phenotypes from their starting genotype, as many still do, and as breeders have been able to do with chickens, cows, apples and cabbages. There is no reason to think that any existing species should be unchanged since creation, as those diverse genes are being expressed, shuffled, and sometimes lost. But you ask for created KINDS, and not species, which actually makes your challenge fairly easy. Dogs, cats, cabbages, and apple trees. But then you ask for kinds that have no ancestors, which can't be what you mean, because you would be asking for kinds which we watched God make in our own lifetime. But if you're asking for a species which has no different species in its ancestry, it's not impossible, but as I described, very unlikely and not what we would expect. I hope this helps.

@theshadow4737

3 жыл бұрын

@@Globeguy1337 I will try to explain. Animal that evolve have a common ancestor. By genetics, fossil record and biology common ancestry is found and the lineage of an animal known. If there re reed kinds, for every created kind there should be an animal without ancestry that the kind evolved from. Anyone who wishes to demonstrate the truth of created kinds can do this by showing the original animals as created that have no common ancestry. If it is impossible to find animals without ancestors the hypothesis of created kinds is falsified, meaning common ancestry is a valid concept. We all agree evolution happened in order to explain diversity of the animal kingdom,.

@theshadow4737

3 жыл бұрын

@@cousinbryan3007 according to you God created genotypes. Show any of them. The original genotypes may not be alive today, but as they were alive 4500 years ago if you believe the stories it must be possible to show them. If all you an show is animals that are known to have ancestors, you fail. For instance dogs have ancestors in wolves.

Was there a mating pair of T Rexes on the boat? Where are they now?

@midlander4

3 жыл бұрын

Was there an intelligently designed Covid-19 virus on the boat, quietly biding its time until its moment of glory thousands of years in the future?

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

the age that existed prior to the flood was destroyed, and now we live in a different "order"

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 what is written.

@HS-zk5nn

2 жыл бұрын

it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because science.

originally sub cellular and then cellular then cell communities/ clusters then increased complexity.

👍🏻

All the animals on the ark God sent to the ark so God chose which animals that was going to be on the ark

@j7bsecond540

3 жыл бұрын

Lol the ark, you know that's a myth right?

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

@@j7bsecond540 You are claiming omniscience?

@j7bsecond540

3 жыл бұрын

@@ITPalGame no, I'm claiming that the ark story is a myth, based on an earlier myth.

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

@@j7bsecond540 circular reasoning

@j7bsecond540

3 жыл бұрын

@@ITPalGame no, it's not circular but it is reason. The claim is global flood - the evidence is no such event occurred- I conclude its a myth. In addition we find the myth is not an original story but is copied almost word for word from an earlier tale. Primitive tribal stories, man made gods

I refer to what has been called the four dimensional information functionality of genes.

The missing link here is the electromagnetic nature of the living cell and the whole Holy Bible generates a knowledge which is leading us to that deep, and indisputable knowledge. This is why our spiritual attitude is so important...we too can harness our electromagnetic behaviour and take hold of our genetic health, but we need Jesus Christ's version of the, Grand Unification of the Four Universal Field Forces, to do it.

Praise GOD THE TRUE CREATOR GOD HELP THE ATHEISTS

GOD is GREAT. HE is so wonderful. GOD spoke and it came into being. HE is the Supreme being in every aspect and way more than we can comprehend. HE loves us and invites us to "Call unto me and I will answer you and show you great and mighty things you know not of " Start calling JESUS CHRIST is the Way.

@nicolasolton

6 ай бұрын

Allah Akbar! Jesus was just a prophet, neither the first nor last. HOWEVER, Muhammad (pbuh) is God's FINAL messenger! Islam is perfect, beautiful, and Supreme. Find Allah and Islam before its too late!

@WayOfHaQodesh

4 ай бұрын

Messiah Yahushua himself never taught that he, a man, the Son of Man, was a part off some Trinity or godhead, both off which are doctrines of LIES, CRAFTINESS, SUBTLETY and GUILE used by the devil to deceive many. Messiah Yahushua himself taught that he is the Son of the living Elohiym, YAHUWAH Most High, Ahaya asher Ahaya, the ONLY self existent Mighty One of Yisra'el, creator of the heavens and earth.

@levnzt6949

Ай бұрын

Are you three guys religion-bots from futurama?

Wow

This is like watching flat earthers trying to disprove the earth being a globe.

@anexistencethatexists

15 күн бұрын

I know lol

Before God, any honest people should say: I am nothing. Oh, God, please have mercy on me!

@maryw9841

3 жыл бұрын

@@velkyn1 Your view is completely wrong. Why? You have to explore of your own will.

@maryw9841

3 жыл бұрын

@@velkyn1 The greatest man in history is Jesus. He had no servants, yet they called him master. He had no degree, yet they called him teacher. He had no medicine, yet they called him healer. He had no army, yet kings feared him. He won no military battles, yet he conquered the world. He committed no crime, yet they crucified him. He was buried in a tomb, yet he lives Today. Amen！

@HS-zk5nn

2 жыл бұрын

it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because science.

@maryw9841

2 жыл бұрын

@@HS-zk5nn Yes, they like to spend time here to speak some nonsense than to spend quality time with honesty to explore if God exists, if Jesus is true God, and if ---many ifs are there valuable and worthy to be explored. May them wake up asap!

@maryw9841

2 жыл бұрын

@@HS-zk5nn They just popped up and said white is black and if you disagree, show them the proof. How and what do you respond to them?

I would almost believe that bears are in that dog mold because they act like big dogs sometimes

I suspect there was more than one example of cat upon the ark.

I'm glad Dr. Wood brought up dog kinds because I'm trying to figure out what a created kind is, and I haven't found a resource that explains them in any detail. Since there's clearly a dog kind, I'm curious whether someone can tell me whether there's a wolf kind, or if wolves are of the dog kind. Dogs and wolves share a common ancestor, so by at least some definitions of created kinds, they should be of the same kind. But that should be the wolf kind since wolves lived long before dogs did. That being the case, there should be no conflict with dogs being of the wolf kind because since change over time within created kinds is supported biblically. Is there a wolf kind? Can someone please help clear this up? Am I missing something?

@IsGenesisHistory

3 жыл бұрын

Hello there! Dr. Kurt Wise (paleontologist) has provided what is probably the most descriptive definition of a created kind that we are aware of. He describes a created kind as "a recognizable group of similar organisms which is surrounded by deep discontinuity and persists by members interbreeding and producing similar offspring." Please click the link to read more about his reasoning behind this definition by clicking here: newcreation.blog/the-biblical-kind/. In addition, when creationists refer to the "dog kind," this is usually shorthand for the family Canidae. Members of this family include domestic dogs, wolves, foxes, and coyotes. Wolves on their own do not represent a "wolf kind" because 1) they can interbreed with other members of Canidae, and 2) they are not surrounded by deep discontinuity from other members of Canidae. I hope this helps!

@User0809205

3 жыл бұрын

@@IsGenesisHistory Thank you for the response, and for the link. The article was a helpful supplement to this video. And I think I have a better feel for how created kinds work, at least for the dog/wolf example. I was thinking of it linearly (i.e. "wolves came first, so it should be called the wolf kind"), but I wasn't thinking about a little later in the video when Dr. Wood said that camels and llamas are both of the camel kind, which roughly corresponds with the family Camelidae. Using that same thinking, it makes sense that wolves and dogs (as well as foxes, coyotes, etc., as you said) would roughly correspond with the family Canidae and be of the dog kind. I feel like that's cleared up, so thank you! The Bible obviously wasn't written as a database of animal kinds for scientific reference, so I understand the challenge of having to quantify a concept as broad as a created kind. Is there a resource that tracks known created kinds that I can refer to? If there isn't, is it fair to use taxonomic families as guide, and just keep in mind that it's not a 1-to-1 match? The example that I've been giving recently is the NCBI's Taxonomy Browser.(1) I understand there are a great number of created kinds, and that our understanding of them changes over time. It's not so much the accuracy of the information that's in it, but the structure that I'm interested in. I'm having an exceedingly difficult time understanding how to determine where a newly-discovered animal fits with such broad descriptions of created kinds, especially if it's unusual or unique. Dr. Wood referred in another video to performing statistical analyses on a specimen (physical measurements, genetic analyses, etc.) to determine what created kind it is. That makes perfect sense, except Dr. Wood doesn't say what he compares his data to. He's not using the taxonomic structure, or else he would just refer to it by its taxonomic name, as opposed to using the taxonomic name as an extra-biblical reference to the created kind he's talking about. I also understand (and greatly appreciate) the references to species, families, genera, etc. as methods to help clarify created kinds. But those are intended for illustrational purposes, and created kinds as a concept have to exist on their own support. That support is obviously the Bible/the word of God, and where things get waaaaaay more complicated is when we start talking in details that the Bible doesn't go into. That's why I land on wanting to know whether there's a reference that I haven't seen yet, or if the idea is more that the people who teach created kinds are the ones who understand how they're described in the Bible and that it's meant to be used as a form of interpreted knowledge, if that makes sense. References: - (1) www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi

@User0809205

Жыл бұрын

@@rachellejones1361 Thank you for the response. Having studied this more, I've found that the Bible provides descriptions of animals based on the authors' understanding of them at the time it was written. It's not a science book, nor was it intended to be one, so it seems it's something of a fool's errand to attempt to square what people thought back then with what we understand today. I was reading it as the unerring Word of God, so it was important to see how it compares to our growing understanding. The only way it makes sense is that the descriptions came from people with a very limited understanding of the animal kingdom. The authors, for example, thought that hares chew cud (Leviticus 11:6 and Deuteronomy 14:7), that bats are types of birds (Leviticus 11:13-19), that grasshoppers have four legs (Leviticus 11:20-22), and that snails dissolve into slime (Psalm 58:8). It's about on par with how I imagine a young adult with no education or access to educational materials would describe the natural world. That's understandable if one sees the Bible as a collection of writings from people 2,600-1,800 years ago. It's a much harder sell that that's how an all-knowing being understood his own creation.

@marcusmuse4787

Жыл бұрын

@@User0809205 you're just looking for excuses to not believe the snail leaves slime everywhere it goes you're being too literal and it is possible to lose things in interpretation from Hebrew to Greek to English.

@User0809205

Жыл бұрын

@@marcusmuse4787 Too scientific, I guess. The "kinds" argument only makes sense at a very high level. It could never be used to teach biology.

Except liger and tigon males are sterile. The chromosomes from the parents, although the same count because they are the same genus (38 from each as most cats have) don't match up in a way the allows the offspring to produce sperm because they are a different species. That's certainly not the case for modern dogs breeds. You can't compare breed and species and suggest they are the same. They are not. So why are dog breeds all the same species, but cats display different species across what would seem like breeds? Perhaps (and most likely) because not all cats come from the same recent ancestor like dogs do from the wolf. Or it could be that dogs weren't isolated by breeds. Perhaps if given a few thousand years and long term isolation of breeds they would also lose their capacity to produce fertile offspring between breeds, thus ushering new species as the order of their chromosomes change but their genus remains the same. Dogs were also bred by humans, cats were bred by their environment, touching back on their aforementioned isolation. Maybe that made a difference. Perhaps at one time, all cats on the planet could produce successful and fertile offspring, but that is no longer the case if it ever was possible in the first place. TLDR, breed and species are not the same. Can breeds become species given time and isolation? Maybe.

Praise God

The animal that looks, and acts, most like a human is a chimpanzee or a bonobo monkey. According to these guys, that means we are the same "kind". Somehow I suspect this "kind" thing doesn't extend to humans. At the same time, just because some animal looks, or acts, like another, it doesn't mean they are related. In some cases it is convergent evolution, that is, animals that despite being unrelated have developed many of the same characteristics. In other cases animals can look, and act, quite differently but be closely related. Whales and hippopotamuses, for instance. "Kind" is a concept unknown to science. There really is no such thing.

What I find fascinating is that somehow unbelievers find life more special without God. That the possibility of their randomness manifesting at all is beautiful. It just sounds dangerous and precarious to me. You are born through chance, live whatever life you are dropped into as best as you can with no help, and then you die and disappear forever. Not only does that contradict human nature...it's just unnecessarily bleak. Looking at life through the eyes of the believer is amazing. Every single thing you see is a work of art created by God. We are wrapped up in safety on this planet perfectly suited for us, and since we must die for now, we face it without fear because we look forward to Him. What is so awful and cruel about that?

@ozowen

2 жыл бұрын

And the life that exists diversified through evolution

Life can not come into reality by nothing And by non living material.

@dooglitas

3 жыл бұрын

I second that motion!

@theshadow4737

3 жыл бұрын

How are you certain??

@dooglitas

3 жыл бұрын

@@theshadow4737 It's impossible. For more information, check out these two videos by an organic chemist, who explains why it is physically impossible. kzread.info/dash/bejne/rIlrrtmwXdaogMo.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/pGinspN-Ya3Kj7w.html

@dooglitas

3 жыл бұрын

@@patldennis Science doesn't "posit" anything. Science is not a person. Science is a method of investigation. Investigation and scientific law makes abiogenesis impossible.

@dooglitas

3 жыл бұрын

@@patldennis Sorry, but you're speaking nonsense. Abiogenesis is not a necessity. It certainly is NOT an observation. No one has ever observed life come into existence from nonliving matter (abiogenesis). It has never been observed, and there is no natural process that could possibly explain its occurrence. Abiogenesis goes against known laws of physics and chemistry. Watch the two videos i linked above.

If a single kind of cat and other animals produced the other kinds of cats and other animals, what happened before the flood since the creation? they were not producing other cats and animals till the flood? Were there only original ones of every animal till the flood and didn’t produce until the flood?

What I would love to hear about is the DNA or genetic origins on Noah and his family and there ability to repopulate the earth. We never hear about that.

@spatrk6634

3 жыл бұрын

because noah and his family didnt exist and global flood never happened during supposed global flood event, tens of thousands of egyptians were building the pyramids at the same time. supposedly underwater

@marcusmuse4787

Жыл бұрын

well, in the year 1800 the world population was 1 billion people according to statisticians. So, in only 200 years we've gained 7 billion people and his sons could've married different racial types. If you agree with evolution there should be a lot more people than that now.

If there was a great flood wouldn't it be likely almost all predators would die off or have to kill many species off to survive at first before many could reproduce fast enough to sustain big predators like bears, lions, tigers, dogs even if there was only pairs that is

@IsGenesisHistory

3 жыл бұрын

You are assuming that "big" predators existed immediately after the Flood. The earliest post-Flood representatives in the fossil record of the various kinds of animals that were on the Ark tend to be smaller than many of their modern counterparts. For example, the earliest members of the cat kind (Felidae), like Proailurus as an example, are not much bigger than present day house cats, and the earliest members of the dog kind (Canidae), like Hesperocyon, were the size of present day foxes. They would have little trouble finding food after the Flood in the form of the remains of animals that died during the Flood and small, fast-breeding animals, like insects, rodents, lizards, and birds.

@vuho2075

3 жыл бұрын

@@IsGenesisHistory Where do you get all of this superstitious nonsense?

@alanthompson8515

3 жыл бұрын

@@IsGenesisHistory OK. Proailurus fossils have been found in Mongolia, Germany, and Spain and Hesperocyon was endemic to North America, with fossil finds ranging from southern Canada to Colorado. If, as you claim, these were the first post-flood ancestors of later cats and dogs, please account for: (i) the lack of any Middle Eastern fossils (i.e. closer to the Ark's resting place and logically where such ur-kinds WOULD be found), (ii) the lack of any change to both kinds between the Ark and the distant locations where our sole information about them is sourced and (iii) the time scales involved to account for the observable variety existing within modern day Felidae and Canidae. You are misusing properly gained scientific data. In other words. blinding with science, I wonder how many of your flock would bother to check up on the geographical distribution of your fossil examples? At a fair guess, none, especially since you are pandering to a pre-existing conformation bias.

@IsGenesisHistory

3 жыл бұрын

@@alanthompson8515 “(i) the lack of any Middle Eastern fossils (i.e. closer to the Ark's resting place and logically where such ur-kinds WOULD be found)” You are assuming that the known fossil record flawlessly reflects the biogeography of ancient taxa. This is false. There are several biasing factors that paleontologists recognize will dictate a taxon’s presence or lack thereof in the fossil record. One is geography; many places simply are not conducive to preservation through fossilization. For example, elevated areas (i.e. the Ark’s resting place in the _mountains_ of Ararat) and continental interiors, among others, are places where preservation via fossilization hardly ever occurs. Another factor is population size; obviously, taxa that are fewer in number leave fewer fossils. Canid and felid populations each arose from a mated pair aboard the Ark. For the first decades or centuries after the Flood, their numbers would have been far too small and concentrated in too small an area for there to be much likelihood of an individual from that period turning up in the fossil record. With the passage of time, however, annual increases would have produced a dramatic increase in numbers, consistent with the level of population and geographic distribution evidenced for in the later stages of the Cenozoic fossil record. “(ii) the lack of any change to both kinds between the Ark and the distant locations where our sole information about them is sourced” Generally speaking, populations will only speciate when they become isolated from one another and can no longer interbreed. The fact that canids and felids contribute little to the early post-Flood fossil record except for “distant locations where our sole information about them is sourced” suggests that they were few in number and not geographically widespread for some time after the Flood. Their eventual, rapid diversification in the early and mid-Cenozoic, however, suggests that it was only at that point when they had spread and multiplied far and wide. "(iii) the time scales involved to account for the observable variety existing within modern day Felidae and Canidae" The span of time allotted to account for the biodiversification of Felidae and Canidae is only an issue if one assumes that creationists must be hampered by the snail-paced rate of change observed in living organisms. However, creationists have long recognized that modern biodiversification mechanisms are inadequate to explain this. Instead, we are in the process of conducting research to determine what alternative mechanisms that may have been involved. For more information on this research project, please click on the link here: newcreation.blog/what-is-the-ekinds-project/

So how do you feel about HELIOCENTRIC SUN WORSHIPERS

@seanaden3387

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 thought U wanted truth. Froggy. Believer of lies Satellites 🛰 only on balloons

@seanaden3387

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 rivers don’t run uphill

@seanaden3387

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 still waiting for a rotation

@seanaden3387

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 shill

@seanaden3387

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 ZOMBIE. They are winning. I have this bridge for u to buy

I just wish he would have left some of the big dinosaurs for us to see

How would all the breeding of cats have happened??? I don't see how??

The only thing I struggle with is where Dinosaurs fit into all this. If what we're told is true, there were 100,000s of different species. Where do they fit in?

@christiansoldier77

2 жыл бұрын

James Species are just varations of the same relative few basic animals kinds so you wouldnt need 100,000 species just maybe 50 of the basic archetypes of the different kinds of dinosaurs

Not dogmatic about this but i feel quite strongly that the great dinosaurs were not actually part of the original creation but were genetically engineered and modified. before the flood by this advanced evil civilization and were not permitted into the ark. God had to destroy the human lineage since it also was corrupted with the seed of fallen angels. but Noah and his family found favor since his line was not mingled with fallen angels that would allow the Messiah to be born from humans and not trans humans.

@christopherfranklin3050

3 жыл бұрын

The book of Enoch explains this and even though it is not part of the Biblical cannon it seems to fill in the gaps of Genesis as to what I believe ocurred.

👁️👁️⚖️✝️🩸👑🪔🍞💧🚪🌡️😡🌪️🌋👀👂⏳, 7 pairs of the clean animals and 2 of the unclean , And i believe they were all babies

DNA

How did the sloths get to south america?

New to this...Creation / Genesis/ Young Earth Theory.. Found this series recently... People like Kent Hovind had me turned off to being open. Some of the things he says are ridiculous to me. I can't listen to him. I'm open to this though. Something I've noticed... On one hand they said that all trees came into existence fully mature and beating fruit... This one says that different species of animals came about over time... Seems like picking and choosing to fit the "theory"... Would appreciate some thoughts on this.

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

you are conflating man's definitions & originally created "kinds"

@Bane_questionmark

3 жыл бұрын

Different people who believe in Special Creation have different ideas and theories. And he's not saying that species came about over time, but that different animals of the same kind are just variations within that kind. Others don't say things like this, they still believe in kinds but think all the different animals in a kind just descended from a common ancestor among themselves, or that all the animals came into existence more or less how they are today. Many other theories too. This perspective in biology is relatively new in the modern world and small, plus there's not a strong system of consensus like there is in mainstream science, so you see a lot of different ideas going around. It's all united not by a specific theory but the general perspective that there's strong evidence the universe was created and that mainstream views on biology, geology, physics, etc. are flawed and don't account for the evidence.

How did the different races begin? Black, Asian, White, Indian?

@quanj777

8 ай бұрын

Good question

@davidmillward3108

5 ай бұрын

In Genesis 1 where God created mankind before creating Adam. God will have created a variety if mankind depending on where they were to live.

@ozowen

2 ай бұрын

Early humans evolved in Africa. Various migrations took them elsewhere, and they evolved into different human species. However, the only remaining species simply adapted to their new environments and were also impacted by their interbreeding with the earlier forms of the other species. eg: There is not Denisovian nor Neanderthal dna in most Africans (except where Asian and European dna is in the bloodline). Most Europeans have Neanderthal dna. Most Asians, Pacific Islanders and Australian Aboriginals have Denisovian dna.

@kcsunnyone

2 ай бұрын

@@ozowen I disagree. Humans did not evolve from apes. That is only a theory that they did and it has never been proven. “Missing Link” has proved to be a fraud. All of those scientists were trying to prove that humans are insignificant- a random act of nature. That simply is not true.

@kcsunnyone

2 ай бұрын

There’s also been a suggestion that Cats because they have slit eyes, they are the product of genetic manipulation, and that part of them could be reptiles.

If all were on the ARK and only these lived after and changed so much , why not before the ark,was there just 2 cats and dogs in the world ,why change so much after the so called flood

Which zoo is that?

Define, "Kind" and I'll listen.

@johnyameen3036

3 жыл бұрын

kind is the thing which makes you different from monkey or rabbit or cow

@ethelwulfmountbattenderoth2286

3 жыл бұрын

​@@johnyameen3036 "Cow" is an ambiguous term. A Female Elephant is called a Cow. A Female Whale is called a Cow. A Female Moose is called a Cow. Female cattle are called Cows. Are they all the same kind? Are they different kinds. Please define Kind.

@johnyameen3036

3 жыл бұрын

@@ethelwulfmountbattenderoth2286 yes they are all different kinds as they have a) different forms b)different but almost same biological systems c)different food preferences plus different habitats but actually a 3 year old can distinguish between a cow and cat and i dont know in which planet do you live where female whales or elephant are called cows female cattles are cows which have atleast one baby

@ethelwulfmountbattenderoth2286

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnyameen3036 I live on Earth and if you included, "Cow" in your statement it shows me that you are not intellectually equipped to tackle this. Google Female Whale or Female Elephant. They are called Cows. Cow is just a name for a female of several species. What we call cattle is essentially man made. OMG, "female cattles are cows which have atleast one baby" I didn't even get to this. WOW, lolwut?

@johnyameen3036

3 жыл бұрын

@@ethelwulfmountbattenderoth2286 oh google boy

Wouldn't we see migration paths of all of the animals from wherever the ark landed?

@JosiahFickinger

2 жыл бұрын

Quick erosion probably

@marcusmuse4787

Жыл бұрын

there's animals that can travel 100's of miles alone so maybe there weren't so many paths left to be seen?

@sextwister

Жыл бұрын

@@marcusmuse4787 imo the flood DID happen, but the Ark is the perfect metaphor that describes all who survived it.

Monocellular! LOL!

Did the polar bear really travel all the way from the Arctic to a hot desert in Israel and onto a boat. ?

@edk484

3 жыл бұрын

No, the bears that left the Ark got offspring that spread all over the world and adapted to the circumstances

@marcusmuse4787

Жыл бұрын

even rabbits fur can change colors from diet alone and a bear going to that region would become adjusted after awhile.

Happy 1 year co-vid lockdown anniversary! :D

I'm wondering what the carnivores ate when they disembarked from the Ark, seeing as how every living thing on planet Earth was dead.

@gifted14sho

3 жыл бұрын

Great question...I'd wondered the same thing.

@koeltefontein

3 жыл бұрын

Suppose they cleaned up the drowned corpses.

@Enigma-2050

3 жыл бұрын

@@koeltefonteinThat’s the answer you’d probably get. I can’t imagine the meat would be too fresh after floating around for 100 days in the water. And then you’d have to take into consideration that all of the animals would have to reproduce and produce offspring, all while having no food available. And when the offspring were finally born, they’d be preyed upon by the predators and they’d have to start all over again. It boggles the mind.

@SuperMichelleDJ

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe some of these animals learned to catch sea life because sea creatures would have survived the flood.

@marcusmuse4787

Жыл бұрын

@@Enigma-2050 seafood everywhere even bears like salmon.

Species are interbreeding forms of animals

Were there pools in the Ark for the pinnipeds??

Who are these people?

@ozowen

2 жыл бұрын

Science deniers

Would the fossil record show exactly what the animals on the Ark were like since the ones that were saved were taken out of those that were left? If God created a fantastic garden with lots of different trees, flowers, fruit etc., why would he create rather dull looking creatures with only the potential of being beautiful and interesting? Are there giraffes, zebras, elephants, flamingos, etc. etc. in the fossil record? Or is the reason biologists say the kinds were dull compared to their amazing and beautiful descendents that that is what the fossil record shows?

@j7bsecond540

3 жыл бұрын

Gloabal flood didnt happen, the ark story is just a copied myth, not real event

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

The whole world became corrupt, and so the best remnants were spared. It's possible some aquatic life survived. There are fossils of early horse kinds, 2ft wingspan dragonflies, giant ferns, etc.

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

@@j7bsecond540 being omniscient, I'm sure you know that I'm typing this right now.

@j7bsecond540

3 жыл бұрын

@@ITPalGame what? Where did I say that lol

@marcusmuse4787

Жыл бұрын

95% of the fossil record is from marine life.

If you have two kinds, chickens and cats that both need to eat to survive, the chicken can peck around and find bugs and seeds and carry on just fine. The cat only eats protein, i.e. chickens. How long can you go without eating? Once one of the cat kind eats one of the chickens, there can be no more chickens. Ever. Never. You need all the carnivores to not eat for as long as it takes for it's prey to multiply enough so that when they start eating there is enough left for the next meal. I don't think so.

@christiansoldier77

2 жыл бұрын

dennis g Meat is not the only source of protein. carnivores can eat plants also sea life was not destroyed in the flood so the cats could eat that

Where on the Arch only vegetarians, including Noah and family?

@Michael_Wehrley

3 жыл бұрын

Yes. It wasn't until after the flood that God said eating meat was okay. Before then it was plants and fruit for mankind and animals alike.

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

and only specific types of animals

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

Ignoring the rule of changing laws in regards to the denigrating creation after the fall, how every woman has a limited supply of eggs she could ever have, with the dwindling gene pool, you will come to false conclusions based on false assumptions. Going backwards, we can infer that mankind just a few centuries after the flood was far more superior in genetic diversity than now.

The Liger part Lion part Tiger is a man made creation from the way the couple who had the first one

NOW you're getting it. lol I believe he's very close to the truth here.

@l21n18

2 жыл бұрын

To what?

I doubt the Animal kinds were adult animals!

If the pandas are in danger in this question's addressed to the godless heathens shouldn't they adapt and evolve? I have no faith in an observation whose results of the observation changes every 80 years

@joshuamatthew6040

3 жыл бұрын

@@hansdemos6510 science is false

@joshuamatthew6040

3 жыл бұрын

@@hansdemos6510 you worship a lie called science got a question for you how come the pandas have an evolved yet do you even know where the big bang came from a Jesuit priest

@joshuamatthew6040

3 жыл бұрын

@@hansdemos6510 silence you atheist godless heathen now go mess with some children antifa can't stand German people that think science is everything

@joshuamatthew6040

3 жыл бұрын

@@hansdemos6510 why is it that you don't put out any videos yourself is that because you're a thief and a mooch that's my observation and hypothesis how about that

I was curious if God provided a Supernatural Odor Remover just for that trip; and how they cleaned up poop... 💡 Then I thought about cruise 🛳 ships...Innnnto the sea it goes! 😶

@skinnyway

3 жыл бұрын

there was only one opening - at the top. no windows... breathing that was part of their trials and refinement for their re-birth when they came out of the ark. if you were really curious you'd research.

Imaginary

There were Not dinosaurs on the Ark.....come on man!

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

how do you know?

@vgovger4373

3 жыл бұрын

@@ITPalGame because they were long dead already and we have no record of dinosaurs in the last 5000 years.

@ITPalGame

3 жыл бұрын

@@vgovger4373 you must be new to this

Life is Alien

Darwin's theory attempted to explain the origin of species - not the origin of genera.

@rogermetzger7335

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 My personal theory is that there is a difference between macroevolution (all types of organisms developing from a single ancestor) and microevolution (varieties of a given "kind" of animal or plant developing over time.

@rogermetzger7335

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 So far, 27 orders, 156 families, 1,258 genera and nearly 6,000 living species of mammals have been cataloged. The dog family (Canidae) includes short-eared dogs, wolves and jackals, crab-eating foxes, maned wolves, Darwin’s wolves, jackals, Neotropical foxes, African wild dogs, raccoon dogs, bat-eared foxes, bush dogs, gray foxes and typical foxes - each a different Genus or what some people might call different “kinds” of animals in the dog family. That is beside the dog breeds that have been developed by humans. I don’t pretend to know how long humans have been breeding dogs and I don’t have an opinion on whether all of the breeds developed by humans came from wolves but that is the prevailing theory right now. How many people would think of the various breeds of dogs developed by humans as different “kinds” of animals within the dog family? The eared seal family (Otariidae) includes northern fur seals, southern fur seals, Australian sea lions, New Zealand sea lions, South American sea lions, Steller sea lions and northern sea lions - each a different Genus or what some people might call different “kinds” of animals in the eared seal family. The family of earless seals (Phocidae) includes Mediterranean monk seals, Hawaiian and Caribbean monk seals, elephant seals, leopard seals, Weddell seals, crabeater seals, Ross seals, bearded seals, hooded seals, gray seals, ribbon seals, harp seals, harber and spotted seals and ringed and inland seals - each a different Genus or what some people might call different “kinds” of animals in the eared seal family. One popular theory is that the God of Moses created many different “kinds” of animals. If humans have “artificially” bred dogs into about two hundred different breeds in a few thousand years (maybe nearly that many within the last thousand years) could “natural selection” account for dozens of different genera within a given family in a similar amount of time? And if that is even a possibility, how much less remarkable would it be that many different species and subspecies may have been developed by “natural selection” within a few thousand years? Bottom line: Which of the categories of animals (orders, families, genera and species) in the animal kingdom most nearly corresponds to the “kinds” of animals in the Genesis account?

@rogermetzger7335

3 жыл бұрын

@@tyrionlannister3459 It's my special gift.

To claim that all these species evolved from one ancestor of the same genus which emerged from the Ark 4600 years ago, is even more evolution dogma than the evolutionists themselves! Because not even they claim that evolution proceeded that fast or differentiated that broadly so quickly! In fact we have mentions of leopards in Song of Solomon from 3000 years ago and lions from the same time period in 1st Kings 10. So they were already differentiated back then only 1600 years after the flood! All this because they don't believe God brought all the animals aboard the Ark.

@fliegendeskrokodil4369

4 ай бұрын

In the past, there was a lot more information in DNA, so evolutionary changes were much faster than they are today. When there is more information in the DNA, there is also much more potential for variation. Today, a lot of the information in DNA has been lost because it has been broken down into all the different types. At that time, two animal parents could have had children who had great differences. We actually see this in the Bible. Read Genesis 25:24-26. In this story, Esau and Jacob are born. Esau is very hairy, but Jacob was not. So there were big differences here even for twins.

@ozowen

2 ай бұрын

@@fliegendeskrokodil4369 There is no evidence for that claim. Ancient genomes compared to modern ones do not indicate that claim at all.

Jehovah The Creator God and His creation are incredibly awe inspiring!

Has there been any real attempt to debunk Evolutionist that ALL life evolves from a single cel/entity. Has anyone cross breed a dog and a cat before? If this didn't work wouldn't it not scientifically debunk Evolution? But my question is has there ever been done before to disprove Evolution theory?

@j7bsecond540

3 жыл бұрын

You can't 'disprove' evolution, its a fact, plain and simple fact. If your primitive book says otherwise its because the book is wrong

@christiansoldier77

2 жыл бұрын

@@j7bsecond540 you cant prove evolution therefore it isnt fact or science no matter what your pseudo-science books say

@j7bsecond540

2 жыл бұрын

@@christiansoldier77 what do you think evolution is? It's easy to demonstrate, easy to understand, if you don't get it I can help. Hopefully you're not one of the clowns that thinks Adam was a real man created from mud and a magic spell. I can't help you then lol

@christiansoldier77

2 жыл бұрын

@@j7bsecond540 The question is what do you think evolution is? Because clearly you dont have a firm grasp on that ridiculous theory

@j7bsecond540

2 жыл бұрын

@@christiansoldier77 not much of a soldier. Just a kid with a big imagination and a dressing up box lol.