One of the best SAM videos in youtube, it’s also good to see old systems because most people don’t understand how complex even the older systems were

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, they were complex another way comparing current systems. The most important to understand the motive, limitations and why looked as way the SAMs as they did. It is clearly seen what were the field experience and what was the impact on the upgrades and following designs. The SAMs did not come from "vacuum".

S400: Grandpa is that you?

@Omprakash-fd2pc

3 жыл бұрын

Cool sarcastic comment

@ikill-98

3 жыл бұрын

S 25: kid back in my day I used to kill Bullies that stronger than me

@1joshjosh1

3 жыл бұрын

Awwwww. Cute. 🥰

@Jay-qb9gi

2 жыл бұрын

@@1joshjosh1 no.

I would love to hear more about air defences! With a lot of technical details! Awesome video! Thumbs up.

@kingofnothing2260

3 жыл бұрын

No.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

;)

@eskoadzovic3835

3 жыл бұрын

Jo@@molnibalage83 h jo i in b m b v i m i CH zu null. Jist der

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

It will be continued on mine chanell the series on Militavia.

I feel like I would have paid more attention in maths classes if we'd been getting this kind of lecture

@rockefelleragent1357

3 жыл бұрын

Super, super boring... I ended up day dreaming about something else

@Qbgarden

3 жыл бұрын

Sock puppets until grade 12!!

@s2korpionic

3 жыл бұрын

Same

@Raz.C

3 жыл бұрын

No, you wouldn't have. Even if by some witches curse, you decided to do a maths subject at university and because of the curse the witch placed on you, you are forced to choose the subject "Linear Algebra." The witches curse might have forced you to enrol yourself in that class, but there's no power in the universe that could make you enjoy it!!! Even powerful magic, combined with powerful drugs, combined with paid assistants, whose job it is to keep you focused, you will NEVER be able to maintain focus in a Linear Algebra course. The problem is that everything is so fucking abstract!!! In my degree as a Chemist (BSc, double major in chemistry) or as a Psychologist (BA psych), I had to do a LOT of different mathematical and statistical analysis and functions and graphic and deriving, etc... Yet not once in my studies, or in my working life in the almost 20 years since have I EVER had to determine the Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues of a matrix. I've never had to diagonalise a matrix. I don't even remember how to do any of those things anymore, and yet my life is as full as the day I learned how to do all that. I chose to enrol in that subject because I thought it seemed easy. I was such a fucking idiot!!! Maths can mean a LOT of different things. If you don't like maths it's probably because you're not good at it. But maths is like anything else; Practice it enough and you'll get good at it. If you honestly make an effort to get good at maths and you stay with it for three months, I guarantee you that you'll start liking maths because you're going to start being really good at it. Once you're good at maths and have started enjoying it, you can either go crazy and start doing crazy shit like Linear Algebra, or you might apply yourself to Chemistry (I highly recommend Chemistry, since every chemist is also a highly accomplished particle physicist AND a nuclear physicist). I also recommend Engineering, or Physics/ Astrophysics. You see, once you start understanding maths and getting good at it, you'll start to find it easy, and then even top tier jobs like Engineering or Chemist-ing or Physics-ing become feasible. You'll be good at those subjects and would be great at that work. I can't recommend it enough. Best of all, along with the understanding of these subjects, you gain a wonderfully deep understanding of the world and how it works as well as the greater universe around us. All the questions you used to wonder about as a kid, but forgot about as an adult are questions that you are able to answer as a scientist/ engineer. edit - the second paragraph should say *"Graphing"* and not "graphic"

@b.elzebub9252

2 жыл бұрын

I actually had a physics-teacher in high school that kind of did this. He'd ask some random people in the class what their general interests were and he'd try to relate the subject to that if he could. It was awesome. That guy really changed the way I looked at science and physics. I remember one particular class where he asked me. So I told him 'I like history and aviation'. And he said: 'So you know how important radar was during the battle of Britain? Do you know how radar works?' Awesome guy now that I think back on that.

who ever is interested in SAM systems, there is a great highly realistic simulator free to download called SAM simulator, it simulates sa-2,sa-3,sa-4,sa-5, and zsu-23-4 shilka anti aircraft gun

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home Hpasp is also participated in the creation of the video.

@thebiger8046

3 жыл бұрын

Хай

@thebiger8046

3 жыл бұрын

Товарищ

@sovietrussia3874

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 ...wow, I didn't know that, but I felt that there was some info obtained from hpasp, because I read about the yo-yo fire control radar on simHQ forum, I'm a huge samsim fan by the way

@B21_raider

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks 👍 some great stuff

Wow.... I didn't know Moscow had such heavily layered missile defence.

@elykeom1

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

@@elykeom1 What is the foundation of "LOL"?

@dhurjatinarayangiri1590

2 жыл бұрын

Moscow the most secured capital in world

@tiborpurzsas2136

2 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 az egy hülye !

@vasilije94

2 жыл бұрын

I mean when there are NATO armies literally on your every border with air fields then you build heavy defenses.

The amount of research on this video is incredible. Looking forward for the s300 and later variant. At the same time, it would also be interesting to make similar contents on anti-ship msystems. Thank you 👍

@jannegrey593

4 ай бұрын

Militavia (so the channel that made all of this research and gave Binkov the script) will soon publish video on S-300. I really hope more people would go to that channel and subscribe, because you won't find any other channel with so much information on the Air Defense systems.

really interesting video ! I hope Binkov will cover the rest of soviet SAM systems...

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

Hopefully the video reach that view count what makes this possible.

I love Russian SAMs! So many different interesting systems. I just started watching the video, but I'm absolutely sure I'm gonna love it!

@thebiger8046

3 жыл бұрын

Хай товарищ!

I really enjoyed the discussion on how these systems work in the first place

Can you do video about eastern mediterranean or Turkey vs Greece updated version. You are the best. HE DID

@Michael_the_Drunkard

3 жыл бұрын

Plsss

@B21_raider

3 жыл бұрын

Yes turkey Vs Greece

@buttegaming4872

3 жыл бұрын

Or India 🇮🇳 vs Nepal 🇳🇵

@B21_raider

3 жыл бұрын

@@buttegaming4872 not a comparison nepal will get crushed

@davidfox2056

3 жыл бұрын

maybe with french and italian support

Thank you for the effort put into this , loved it!

Binkov you have outdone yourself 👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 THANK YOU 🙏 that was an excellent succinct informative flawless video 👍 THIS is why I subscribe and support your channel 👍💪

Generalissimus Binkov

Amazing in-depth video. I would love to see follow-up videos on later sam systems.

@jannegrey593

4 ай бұрын

There is one on Militavia channel. Made by the person, who made this script.

You need to do more video's like this

What a great job! I really want more of high detail analysis on this channel!

For those of you who want to learn more go watch a documentary called “protecting the skies of the motherland”. 4 episode on Russia air defence. «Защищая небо родины» Edit: it is available on KZread, however I could only find the version on Russian: Part 1: kzread.info/dash/bejne/faapp8ZqdMvdk8o.html Part 2: kzread.info/dash/bejne/d211pLxtk5O8qMo.html Part 3: kzread.info/dash/bejne/o4eaz86NirSpdJs.html Part 4: kzread.info/dash/bejne/YneAubWqib2yos4.html

@USSAnimeNCC-

3 жыл бұрын

Know where it is available

@TheGranicd

3 жыл бұрын

@@USSAnimeNCC- youtube

@balouserena

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheGranicd Are you sure? I cannot find it and I would very much like to see this.

@scudb5509

3 жыл бұрын

balouserena Unfortunatley I only know the Russian version: kzread.info/dash/bejne/faapp8ZqdMvdk8o.html That is part 1 out of 4. It moves from the oldest systems to the newest in the final part.

Such high quality video. Very thank you Comissar Binkov.

Wow one of your best videos. Absolutely excellent discussion and introduction to how SAMs and their radars work. Learned much from watching this

@militavia-air-defense-aircraft

Жыл бұрын

Because a guest author made it. I did it :) Here you can find more. kzread.info/dron/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html

This was gold, please keep it up. You just gained a subscriber.

KZread year 2060: Was S-400, Russian Federation SAM system, ahead of its time?

@user-ou9qd9no5n

Жыл бұрын

HIMARS: no

Love the graphics style!

This is the kind of detail I really appreciate. Thank you.

I worked in navy radar as an avionics tech. This is accurate

Excellent! ... Thank you guys! (Well done Molni).

This was really interesting. It'd be cool to see more videos like this.

Great info. Love your channel.

Congrats to Balázs ! Imprfessive video. Much appreciated.

This videos is so good, please do more about Soviet SAMs

I really loved this video. If you have paid attention in physics class, this video will interest you very much. Thanks Binkov for the video and the detailed analysis of S-25.

My line of work its just that, radars and stuff! I must say that i enjoyed this video very much

This video is 100/100.

A good length video after a long time

Molnibalage!! Is that you! VIP here from benchmarksims. Loved your 80's campaigns :)

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, that is me.

@jakobole

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 Nice to see you unfold your knowledge proper on YT! Thanks for all you've done over the years!

Really interesting video. I learned a lot from this material

Very high quality work mr.Binkov. Can't wait for a part.2 This was fascinating. I don't care which weapon system you do next. If it's this good, I'm sold.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

As the timeline dictates the SA-75 Dvina is the following.

I love this very in depth and detailed technical video

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

The next will come sooner than you think. ;)

@militavia-air-defense-aircraft

Жыл бұрын

More here. kzread.info/dron/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html

This is a very good in-depth analysis.

@militavia-air-defense-aircraft

Жыл бұрын

Here you can find more. I made this video as a guest here. :) kzread.info/dron/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html

Thank you for your video, Binkov! Much needed for any outsiders there that any, ANY SAMs are dangerous regardless of technology if you didn't put enough countermeasures in your aircraft.

The best Military channel ever... Thank you brother. It will be Nice if for every video you give us some references. 🇩🇿 Mustapha from Algeria

I’ve been watching Binkov for a while now! I loved his videos! As such, I made my own sci-fi/futurist channel!!

what an elite video - most fascinating video I've ever seen in entire military videos congratulation

In light of recent events, what we really need is a Turkey vs Greece video!

@wanderer10k

3 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure he has one of these already, have a searc h

An INCREDIBLE VIDEO!

Excellent video, thanks for using the original GRAU designations as main rather than the confusing NATO ones that often don't discriminate between variants!

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

Without using the original designations would be impossible to make the video.

Excellent video. I would watch the crap out of a series of these videos.

And because of excellent KZread videos like this.... I don't have cable. 👍👍👍👍

Why isnt the voice matching Binkovs mouth movements?

If you are interested in soviet planes and rockets, and you are nearby, the museum called Reptár in Szolnok, Hungary worth a visit, at least 40 planes including a spitfire and a me 109 can be seen there. It's like 100 km from Budapest so it's not hard to get there

Russia (2020)VS Soviet Union (1989)

Its good to hear about the old Soviet Union and especially the S-25 missile system. The S-25 was tested by the U-2 flights over the Soviet Union from the mid-1950s. The system was not able to intercept a U-2 until 1960 when 14 SA-2 missiles were fired, one downing a MiG-19, before Gary Powers U-2 was hit.

Your videos is great!

Now my brain hurts but it is "good pain".

I would like to see a video about the sam network in Hanoi during the Vietnam War

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

If the video receives enough attention... ;)

Excellent.

I want to use this opportunity to thank the Beria family for what they accomplished for our country. Like father like son both had immense part in building not only our intelligence services and defence capabilities, but also our industry and enginieering in general as well. They and their efforts are not forgotten. Lavrentiy Pavlovitch's fall in the coup d'etat was a sad episode of soviet history. Lesser men deposed and killed him and stated a huge slander campaign that contunues on to this day.

Very good!

Talking about multi-layered air defense system... damn....

one of you best videos.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

The next will come sooner than you think about one of the iconic SAM system of the Cold War. ;)

@militavia-air-defense-aircraft

Жыл бұрын

More here. kzread.info/dron/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html

Muy buena la explicación

Mathias Rust likes it. :D Also waiting for Mathias Rust/ Cesna plane vs S400 & modern Russian A2AD.

@OchotaJack

3 жыл бұрын

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathias_Rust

@seno5530

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for reminding. Hate to nitpick, but technically the Berkut had been phased out by 1984. At least according to that diagram in the video.

*thanks to all*

wow so great

THIS, is THE best missile video EVER !!!

@militavia-air-defense-aircraft

Жыл бұрын

Here is continued the story. kzread.info/dron/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html

What many don't know about the cute little frog in these videos is that he was a decorated SAM operator during the Cold War. He is credited with shooting down 1 SR-71 Spyplane, 2 B-47's, 4 Cessna's, a hang-glider, 20 hot air balloons and a cloud that really did look like a monster. Promoted and demoted a record 37 times, Binkov eventually made the rank of General and declared war on cats. After the Binkov-Feline War, as it was known in the east, he retired to a cabin in Minsk to drink the days away and watch videos of frogs mating. Please check out my new book, available on Amazon: Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson. 100 full color pictures of futuristic jets.

Not an easy feat to explain. Well done', very informative

This is a good video. Pls make a video with Hungary vs Serbia.

@TheGranicd

3 жыл бұрын

Or not.

@idiebeforeiquit

3 жыл бұрын

Vajdaság nekünk azt cserébe megkaphatják Koszovót.

@svenskaz3428

3 жыл бұрын

Could you please stop requesting this 1v1 scenario

@GamblingIo

3 жыл бұрын

Romania and Serbia vs Hungary and Austria or Ukraine

@scudb5509

3 жыл бұрын

Croatia vs Serbia way more realistic. Or Serbia vs Albanian.

next Episode: S75 and maybe also the AS 4 kitchen or at least early air to ground missiles

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

I would be quite hard to make a video alone the AS-4 and it would be pointless. Therefore you can guess what will be the next. ;)

The s 250 was very advanced and is still a threat today

@militavia-air-defense-aircraft

Жыл бұрын

There is not such SAM as S-250. kzread.info/dron/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html

do the same video with s-75 dvina

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

Just check the diagram at the beginning of the video. ;)

what instrument reads the radar and turns the fins of missile that guide it to the target and how does the mechanism work?

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

This is way to deep question to answer. You need the blueprints of the systems. The principle of the system is the point of the video. You are asking not about "basic design" level but detail design.

@imrekalman9044

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 Excellent work! (Másfél évet voltam Volkhovon, Sárbogárdon, ez a videó elég sok emléket felhozott. 😊)

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

@@imrekalman9044 Ha lesz folytatás, akkor még több emlék lesz. ;)

American pilots would describe “sams” as appearing as telephone poles hurtling up at them at supersonic speed!

Like No one can outmatch US in the air power similarly No one can match Russias SAMs. India purchased S400, which is a memoth with its technology and capabilities. But the specs of S500 are mind-blowing, especially it's range and reaction time 🙏

It seems like a LOT of these systems could have been made a LOT safer if them just moved the command bunker 10 - 20 meters away from the electronics/ radars, via cables, so that anti-radiation missiles/ bomb strikes against the radars would not kill the operators in the bunkers. Maybe some concrete reinforcing, as with Vietnamese SA 2 sites wouldn't have gone amiss, either.

Binkov, why at 7:49 do you cut off an not mention the low altitude design flaw (closed caption shows it but you edited that part out).

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

He did not cut anything from the video. And it was not a design flaw. It was simply not demanded initially. What is not requested it cannot be a "flaw"...

@archieosborn

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 Or vulnerability. Whatever you want to call it. Just curious why it was cut out. Binkov has great videos but sometimes they seem a bit biased.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

@@archieosborn He did not cut anything. This is the video with full content. I know, because I made it... Did you watch all the end? Where is mentioned that late '70s following the appearance of low level terrain following CMs the Berkut became totally outdated? This was the main cause of rapid development of S-300PT which did not reach the aimed capability. The originally planned first S-300 variant was the S-300PS but it was so urgent the need that created the PT and PT-1. But this point is quite far now in the storytelling.

@archieosborn

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 Got it. More for the flow of the story. Makes sense. It was definitely cut but no biggie. Just curious why. Thanks for the info! Overall very good video with lots of info. I appreciate that!

I think this system at whole is more complicated than S400 today!

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

In some way on operational level yes, especially because the very dangerous liquid fuel and lots of large mechanical parts.

Someone: US would drop an atomic bomb on Moscow. USSR: Don't worry comrades! Yo-Yo will save our motherland.

since teen years i developed interest in missiles and air defense. Berkut was known to me, pleasanter surprise. My short story - 'the hardest-desert scarab,' consists of defense engaging stand off munitions. Free reading by google search.

WoW Molnibalage!? :-D I know him from HTKA forums. We miss you dude!

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

I'm still active there.

@joco94

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 Igen, de a BiztPol. topikban már sajnos nem, én pedig nagyrészt ott olvasok.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

@@joco94 Oda én nem járok. Amúgy se irhatok oda, de ha lehetséges lenne, akkor sem.

@joco94

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 Tiszta sor, attól még sajnálatos. :-)

Can you do marine regiment/division vs the grand armée next

Yes

You should do one on the SA 3 next

@militavia-air-defense-aircraft

Жыл бұрын

Here is continued the story. The SA-3 was released some weeks ago. kzread.info/dron/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html

Good man is Binkov!

Quite the monster system for the 1950s

Can you do a video on the Nike Ajax and Hercules system?

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

If the whole series get a green light following the Soviet SAMs it can be done.

Can you make a video on David Sling air defense system.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

I do not know well that system. In fact most of current SAMs uses quite the same general principle, only their radar types and missiles are different. But exact data are classified. Making a detailed video with useful information is quite hard. The best what is possible when all the major Russians SAMs are known and basics of the NASAMS2 and S-350 you can compare the main items on basic level but that is it. You can't find real usable data about missile maneuvering capability or anything. The principles and goals can be shown but such detailed style what you can see this video is not possible.

Now do the S-75 next!

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

;) In fact SA-75 then S-75. They were not the same.

Hey Binkov, try to make a video about a modern replay of the American civil war...

Just one small mistake. G rate is important only in relation of successful maneuver at a very short distance. Due to how geometry works, any maneuver done by target will require a significantly lower adjustment by pursuer. G differences are more theoretical and are about how effectively pilot manages to avoid incoming missiles. With fighter planes pilot had some room to maneuver, but even if pilot knows what to do exactly, it still does not make missile obsolete. However, targets against which this system was initially designed had no dodging capabilities. G turn rate is highly situational and marginal statistic.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

This is not true. Short distance is not = with terminal phase. The leading and other issues will be explained later.

@REgamesplayer

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 Refer to what I had said previously. Incoming object does not need same levels of maneuverability in order to track target. Its one degree shift can cover 90 degree shift in maneuvering object if distances between two objects are large enough.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

@@REgamesplayer I will explain in detail everything as the length of the videos allow. There is not such kind of mistake in a video. You will see hopefully even in the following video.

@REgamesplayer

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 If you say so.

If possible, could you make a video were ww3 starts but no nukes and same morality just basic ww3 how it would play out would a side win or would it just be who survives the longest type of ww like for example ww1

На канале RUROOMREC. видео 6 частей, автор рассматривает, разъясняет систему С-25 "БЕРКУТ" от строительства до ликвидации. Очень ярко, информативно на примере одного из полков системы с позывным "Кабарга". Это первая часть kzread.info/dash/bejne/eJWdltmYl8W3lrg.html

S-25 as stationary and needing a large infrastructure maybe? S-75 had better mobility while still defending mostly stationary places. It all depends if you are talking Defense of a Country vs. Defense of an Army.

Berkut - Golden Eagle.

@YuryMar

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, and 'Sosna' it's not the name of the river, but Pine (kind of the tree).

The coordination of aegis THAAD and PAC3

No ones commenting about how simplistic western assumptions of Soviet military capabilites , were ....lol

if a missile/rocket motor has no turbopump but relies on pressure, maybe it's better to call it pressure-fed? then again if pressurizing gas is generated instead of stored separately it might make sense to call it a gas generator cycle even though 'gas generator cycle' usually implies 'gas is produced to power turbopumps to pump fuel'

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

If you think through it would be pointless such term. Because if you have pump what does the pump do? Increase pressure. Any fluid is pressure fed. The question is what provides the pressure.

Soviets were always ahead in two areas: anti-air missiles and small arms.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

This is not exactly true. In fact the first mobile SARH guided SAM with CW illumination was the HAWK. IOC 1960. For the Soviets the 2K12M Kub, the really fist reliable variant was available about 6-7 years later. The Nike Ajax and Hercules combined wit SAGE were such advanced that we cannot speak about 'ahead'. The US and western SAMs are generally less known because they are barely or not at all were used in combat comparing to Soviet SAMs.

@andro7862

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 I was referring to AA missiles in general. Like the R-73 which was at its time, unrivaled among short range IR missles.

@molnibalage83

3 жыл бұрын

@@andro7862 Which is also not true. The only unique capability of the R-73 was the TVC. The HOBS capability was available in small scale. The F-14J (Block 45 and 46 series) and on F-4N in 1970 was available a helmet mounted sight with AIM-9H. It was considered too complex, heavy and unpractical the system and they discarded. But it was 13+ years ahead of the USSR. Then the US Navy switched to Hornet good slow speed pitch authority instead HOBS. www.best-of-flightgear.dk/vtas.htm Otherwise the R-73 was just and upscaled R-60M with TVC and better seeker gimbal. It is just arrived later and more hyped.

@bacnguyen9304

3 жыл бұрын

Also tanks the T-64 is the first MBT to have composite armour layout ,smooth bore gun that enter mass production and for an entire decade NATO has nothing similar.

@andro7862

3 жыл бұрын

@@molnibalage83 But it never entered service. The R-73 did.

Imagine if binkov was a general

@sockaccount8116

3 жыл бұрын

The whole world would be at war!

@theyaregone

3 жыл бұрын

Binkov is not Russian last name ... its may be jewish bulgarian or makedonian

Can you do *UK vs US: War Plan Red* next?