Sounds like a rocket launching jesus

@joshuadunford3171

4 жыл бұрын

Thanos Chungus (I know I’m late) It that’s because it basically is, the TU144 used Afterburners like fighter jets.

@novemberdelta1282

4 жыл бұрын

@@joshuadunford3171 the concorde also did even though it was slightly quieter

@joshuadunford3171

4 жыл бұрын

Subaru Impreza WRX STi '05 good point, but I believe Concorde’s were used for take off, and not the whole flight, but please correct me if I’m wrong

@novemberdelta1282

4 жыл бұрын

@@joshuadunford3171 concorde shut the afterburners as a noise abatement rule shortly after takeoff, if i'm not wrong they re-ignite them later in flight to get supersonic, and then turn it off again.

@joshuadunford3171

4 жыл бұрын

Subaru Impreza WRX STi '05 ok then, thanks for the info.

You can see here the famous/infamous yelloish/orange smoke of the so-called partial afterburner of the NK-32 engines. The NK-32 engine of the Tu-160 bombers has three different afterburner regimes. This one on this footage was the secondary one. There was no chance to use the third, or full afterburner on the Tu-144LL, where no smoke generated at all, because of the inlet cross section of the 144. The inlet was designed for the Tu-144S airplanes, which used the NK-144F, afterburner turbofan engines. It has less airflow, than the later NK-32 had. These engines were not so efficient and regarding to the bypass ratio of the turbofan design, the airplane immediatelly deccelerated down to Mach 1.6, when the AB switched off. However, with the AB, the range was so small. Thats why the Tu-144D was developed. D - Dorabotaniy: re-designed stands for the basic difference, the engine itself. The engine of the Tu-144D was the Kolesov RD-36-51A, without any afterburner! It also could reach the Mach 2.1, but with a much larger flight range. However, even if the last portion of the 16 ever built Tu-144 was a D model, no any D was involved in the commercial flights. The certificate was already done, when one Tu-144D was crashed because of the turbine disk explosion of the unique RD-36-51A engine. The soviets immediatelly cancelled all Tu-144S and D flights. The funny thing is, that the Tu-144LL No. 77-114 and the 77-115 planes just finished after the cancellation! The 77-114 was involved in the Ozon layer research program in the early 80’s and the Buran program in the mid-80’s with the original engines. The mid 90’s Tu-144LL program required a more reliable and right on time available engines, so the russians took the NK-32 from the Tu-160 program, under the project re-name NK-32-1, or NK-321. This minor difference was just a re-tuning according to the smaller cross section of the Tu-144D engine intakes and the higher altitude and continous speed regimes. The NK-32/321 and the former NK-144F are two completely different animals. Different sizes, dimensions, stage configuration, number of shafts, nozzle profiles, afterburner stages, pressure ratio, airflow, thrust level and so on. The one and only easy thing in the installation of the NK-32 into the engine nacelles of the RD-36-51A, was the quite similar mounting dimensions. That’s why they could easily put back the old engines, when the program finished in 1999. The original engines went back into the 77-114 in 2003.

@lillekenatnek195

Жыл бұрын

You forgot about the spheromanic vortex cancellor and the fuel inlet pump actuator idk where dafuk im talking about

@ilya.kortev

Жыл бұрын

Many hours of flight at supersonic speed, aerodynamic heating, hot kerosene in tanks: 100-140c, as a result of heating, oxidation processes have a bad effect on the properties of the fuel. To prevent oxidation of kerosene, it is nitrided. That's why the exhaust has that color.

@kolbola

Жыл бұрын

@@ilya.kortev I don't know, from where you get this, but there is no such thing on a military airplane. You may be think about the nitrogen gas system, which is for the prevention of a tank explosion at direct hit. This system is called as neutral gas system and it is automaticly fill up the tanks as the fuel level decreasing to prevent the fuel-air vapour development. While the kerosene is just burning, the vapour is a dangeorus explosive mixture. Each time, whene you see this yellowish smoke, the airplane was just loaded up recently, so there was no time for any previous oxidation. If you would be right, every single jet would have a nitrous "oxidisation preventing" system, due to the supersonic heat load on the tank external surface. But there is no such thing.

@ilya.kortev

Жыл бұрын

@@kolbola For many years, the joint creative activity of two outstanding scientists prof. G.M. Panchenkov and General Aircraft Designer A.N. Tupolev. Today there is an opportunity to briefly talk about one of the areas in their joint work - participation in the creation of a supersonic passenger aircraft TU-144. Of the hundreds of different problems faced by the creators of an aircraft with a flight speed of Mach 2-2.35, when the fuel in the tanks is heated to 100-140 ° C, the fuel problem has become. A.N. Tupolev, well aware of the importance and novelty of the problem, attracted the Central Institute of Aviation Motors (CIAM named after P.I. Baranov) and the Department of Physical, Colloidal and Radiation Chemistry of the Moscow Institute of Petrochemical and Gas Industry named after P.I. THEM. Gubkin. Young engineers of OKB A.N. Tupolev, headed by V.V. Malyshev and specialists from institutes under the scientific supervision of prof. G.M. Panchenkova successfully solved the problem. The conducted research made it possible to propose fuel nitriding for the TU-144 aircraft as a means of solving many technical problems, including the problems of self-ignition, proper organization of mass transfer processes in fuel tanks both in the liquid and gas phases, fuel dehydration, and effective means of protection against electrification have been developed. fuel during its injection into aircraft tanks. The work carried out showed the novelty of the problem (report No. 62406 of 1964 was registered with the State Committee for Inventions and Discoveries as the first work on the problem). The results of the work were further introduced into everyday practice and became the state standard. When carrying out the process of fuel nitriding, for the first time, a regular wire nozzle G.M. Panchenkov. According to the results of the work performed under the guidance of G.M. Panchenkov, Ph.D. dissertations were defended by the specialists of OKB A.N. Tupolev: V.V. Malyshev, V.D. Borisov, V.P. Logvinyuk, A.A. Popov, V.D. Sorokin, V.N. Gorelova and others.

@ilya.kortev

Жыл бұрын

@@kolbola The filling process looked like this. A tanker and a car with a nitrogen mixture are being fitted to the Tu-144. The hose from the tanker is connected to some kind of device, such as a "tee", to which the hose is also connected from a source with a nitrogen mixture. And from the "tee" the hose goes to the Tu-144. And they don't rush. The process lasted at least until lunch. p.s. Military aircraft, not all, are still refueling with nitrided fuel.

Our ancestors were geniuses. Without computers and CAD systems, with the help of a pencil, ruler and calculator, they developed such masterpieces.

@Calikid331

Жыл бұрын

It's pretty amazing. I'm currently a mechanical engineering student and I couldn't imagine doing all the complicated math I have to do without the help of the internet and super advanced calculators.

@sierra6993

Жыл бұрын

The TU 144 is an absolute failure, not a masterpiece

@Niki-fw4ir

Жыл бұрын

Spymaster

@theflotheflo

Жыл бұрын

@@sierra6993 a commercial failure, jet an engineering masterpiece. apart from the engines... they were revolutionary jet not quite mastered at the time

@alexfinns6162

Жыл бұрын

@@theflotheflo it was somewhat of an engineering marvel. It had many problems though. Did you know that they added the front winglets because the plane kept on crashing?

Just like the Concorde, the TU-144 is a beast. The NK-32 turbojets were very powerful like the Rolls Royce Olympus engines on the Concorde. This airplane might've not have had as much success as the Concorde because of operational issues, but on take-off, it is just as impressive.

@Darakusillygoober

Жыл бұрын

NK 32 are used on legendary Tu-160 strategic bomber

@SMGJohn

Жыл бұрын

Tu-144 was by every means a safer plane when operated gently, the irony is that majority of issues with Tu-144 could be fixed, but the crash at Paris airshow cut a huge amount of funding so those lessons were taken to Tu-160 which is by every means, truly a legendary super bird that spits on Concorde as weak.

@Dan.d649

Жыл бұрын

@@SMGJohn The B1-B is a far better airplane then the TU-160. The 144 was a little too complicated for a supersonic transport.

@SMGJohn

Жыл бұрын

@@Dan.d649 B1? Good luck transporting the same amount of bomb load as a Tu-160 in that tiny plane.

@Dan.d649

Жыл бұрын

@@SMGJohn The B1-B Lancer doesn't need to carry a huge load of bombs. It can be very effective with what it can carry. The TU-160 is too large for it's principle role, and way too over-powered.

This is a "TU-144 Flying Laboratory" with non-original engines of TU-160 bomber. Therefore it is such noisy.

@F3HDemonDriver1

5 жыл бұрын

Noise abatement wasn't a big concern during the Soviet years LOL

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

@@F3HDemonDriver1 ..yes,but this take-off is between 1996 - 99(TU-144LL) ,so russian years in cooperation with Rockwell and NASA .. :)

@kathleenoakley6474

4 жыл бұрын

Somehow I doubt the original engines were exactly "whisper quiet" either. Sideline take-off noise on both Concorde and the TU-144 were ear-splitting.

@Freddy22803

4 жыл бұрын

@Podge Maybe. But the engines of Tu-160 decided to take not because of increased power - but because there were no original engines lefts in working condition at that time :)

@jagdpanther2224

3 жыл бұрын

Later the Tu144 was a supersonic cargo plane, so the huge noises doesn't matter at all! The cargos won't make complaints! 👌

RIP, headphone users!

@SergeevAviationVideo

5 жыл бұрын

Ahahah yeap... ✊🏻 🛫

A wonderful aircraft .. :) Thank you TUPOLEV for this ship ... !

@kulkuri25

5 ай бұрын

Copie Concorde en moins résistant...

@starvladstarvlad

5 ай бұрын

​@@kulkuri25No

@planevideosinrfs

Ай бұрын

@@kulkuri25чего вы блять там все обкурились, ту-144 и Concorde-одноклассники, но сука никак не копии друг друга. Из-за своей конструкции естественно они будут похожи, по такой логике ДС-9 копия Ту-134…

@Lurk-s

24 күн бұрын

​@@kulkuri25nuh-uh. They was created IN SAME TIME. Soviet and French engineers helping each other to build that beautiful planes

The Tu-144 is just a freaking Russian masterpiece. They look so mean and just like any eastern block countries aircraft oh god I’m in love

@AverageAlien

Жыл бұрын

Russian steaming pile of shit cheap copy more like

@fishbarbeque8540

Жыл бұрын

yup it is a dope aircraft, I like the symmetry more than the concord.

@user-ih6bg7yf2u

Жыл бұрын

Это советский самолёт, а не российский. Разница в этих понятиях есть.

@Fred_the_1996

Жыл бұрын

​@@user-ih6bg7yf2u yeah, there were 13 countries in the ussr i think

@monsieurkot5858

7 ай бұрын

​@@user-ih6bg7yf2uРоссия государство продолжатель ссср, так что ваше утверждение бессмысленно. КБ Туполева тем более в РСФСР находилось.

What an aircraft.

@F3HDemonDriver1

6 жыл бұрын

%100 agree!

@barackobama1099

4 жыл бұрын

No

@AviationSimulation

4 жыл бұрын

What a copy indeed

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

@@AviationSimulation No copy ,Greta :)Original TU-144 "Charger" ,, first Supersonic-Airliner of the world ! Grets to Stockholm

@AviationSimulation

4 жыл бұрын

@@supersonic1246 judging by your username I assume you're a supersonic jet expert. So I'll leave you to it

The Tu-144 here has NASA markings. In the 1990's, we got to borrow one for research. It had been neglected but, was still flyable. NASA fixed it all up, gave it a few upgrades, and a fresh paint job. We returned it to Russia in better condition than we borrowed it.

beautiful smoke trail

@AlexJuravsky

7 жыл бұрын

This nitrogen footprint engines from Tu-160;)

@Got_braaaaap...

6 жыл бұрын

Marking his territory...like a dog hahaha

@GonkDroid0923

3 жыл бұрын

Both the concorde and the tu 144 left smoke trails because of the after burners.

@GooseBurt

3 жыл бұрын

Looks like projectile aerosol diarrhea.

@lexus8018

2 жыл бұрын

Nitrogen oxide, poisinous gas

Big thunder! a rocket is being launched!😲 "What a frightening and fascinating plane."😎💪

Such a gorgeous aircraft! 😍

@F3HDemonDriver1

5 жыл бұрын

I agree Sir!

@Shadoe1622

2 жыл бұрын

@@F3HDemonDriver1 Me too.

@OClurzxy

2 жыл бұрын

@@Shadoe1622 yeah. I like the front wings very much.

@joemontano71

Жыл бұрын

It’s easy to make a gorgeous aircraft when you copy the Concords blueprints.

@TheRVSN

8 ай бұрын

@@joemontano71 "when you copy the Concords blueprints" - aircraft engineers laughing at you.

espectacular sonido, full power

Bloody hell! 0.0 Rattled my head! Absolutely nailed it!

@F3HDemonDriver1

4 жыл бұрын

No Noise abatement at this airport LOL

Это было круто)а звук то какой)спасибо.у нас в пригороде такой стоит.по истине огромный самолет.Хвост высотой до 7 го этажа

Looks like half the fuel was used just to take off

this is the best plane ive ever seen the take off sound is loud but majestic

@F3HDemonDriver1

4 жыл бұрын

She has the same engines that are on the Backfire and Blackjack bombers.

@mk-hc3pj

4 жыл бұрын

@@F3HDemonDriver1 oh thx didnt know that

@F3HDemonDriver1

4 жыл бұрын

@@mk-hc3pj Yeah they are Tumansky turbofans with afterburners, very smokey and noisy. . . .and smokey LOL

@mk-hc3pj

4 жыл бұрын

@@F3HDemonDriver1 :'''''')

Amazing !!

I saw the model of the Tu-144, 50 years ago this month, July, at EXPO 67 in Montreal. Would like to know where the model is, if it still exists. To see a real Tu-144 would be on my bucket list.

@F3HDemonDriver1

7 жыл бұрын

There are 5 or 6 Left in Russia, None in flying condition though.

@iamlarsen7896

6 жыл бұрын

C. Man one of them is mounted on top of a museum in Germany along with a concorde...

@adamhale6672

5 жыл бұрын

I know I'm a year late, but earlier this year I was given the fantastic opportunity to see on of the few remaining Tu-144s. I spent two years in Russia and was able to take a trip to the Monino Air museum a few hours outside of Moscow. It was amazing to see and my poor friend (who isn't as into aviation) was wondering why I was melting when I saw it. They were also doing tests on the nose lowering and raising mechanism that day which was neat. There are also many other strange and amazing aircraft from the Soviet era there.

@canamwing6999

5 жыл бұрын

It still exists. They painted over and it is in the museum in Monino Moscow.

@MilkTea101

4 жыл бұрын

There is one in Germany next to a Concorde, aviation museum though

Sounds much LOUDER than the British ConCorde!

@F3HDemonDriver1

6 жыл бұрын

It most likely was a few more decibels louder than the Corde.

@cac_deadlyrang

5 жыл бұрын

And a bit faster, too.

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

@@cac_deadlyrang ... maybe ... cause with NK-32(1) ... :)

@AviationSimulation

4 жыл бұрын

I think when you pay that much money to fly on a Concord. I'd rather listen to silence than hear 2 rats having sex in the cargo hold because that's what the tu 144 sounded like

@american101

4 жыл бұрын

greta thunberg official 😂

goosebump every time i see it

Son extraordinaire. Merci pour la vidéo.. 👍👍👌

A true legend

Those afterburners are giving me a headache!!!!!!! Plus they had to run them through the duration of the flight just to stay supersonic, while Concorde's afterburners were simply switched off once Mach 2 was reached.

@F3HDemonDriver1

5 жыл бұрын

Very true, and the TU-144 only had a commercial life of around 1 year inside the USSR before it was taken out of service.

@Tengri30

5 жыл бұрын

Well the engines on this special plane were prototypes of them which they use on the Tu-160 today. There were 3 regular types of the 144. The first one (CCCP-68001) which was way different from the two later built types. the first of them, The Tu-144S had afterburners and only a max reach of around 3000km, the second, which was the most produced type was the "D" Version, D: Dalnyy (long range), with a range of up to 6000km. This version had no afterburners at all, it used variable plug nozzles like some of the fighter jets back in the day. The one in the video uses NK-32 afterburning engines for test purposes '(This plane is the "LL" - Flying research lab version).

@jeylful

5 жыл бұрын

Still, beautiful plane too

@TheBillzilla

4 жыл бұрын

@@Tengri30 - The way the main landing gear retracts is also fascinating to me. Very clever.

@jordzking6330

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah it's a really bad knock off

This sounds just like music to me 💗

This Tupolev TU 144 looks like a bird.... Rare and impressive; I don't know if it was better than the Concorde, but I think it was a little more powerful, but the overall quality was better on the European SST. TU 144 had greater fuel consumption, was noisy and had several problems. Due to the greater fuel demand, it had less autonomy so, it was not profitable for as a passenger commercial aircraft, but for some reason NASA choose it instead of Concorde .

@F3HDemonDriver1

6 жыл бұрын

Trust me the Sud, BAE Concord was WAAAY more advanced and much safer than the TU-144 Ed.

@jeylful

5 жыл бұрын

Loved the retractable canards though, another quirky feature like the droop nose

@lery1968

4 жыл бұрын

Better than the Concorde 🙂 never

@Cookivirus

2 жыл бұрын

the engines were powerful but not designed for subsonic

You've got to be kidding me, AMAZING!

@F3HDemonDriver1

5 жыл бұрын

Loud Huh, the TU-144 was one beautiful Bird!

Holy crap! What a powerhouse.

Awsome !

1 of the finest aircraft EVER made!

Le TU 144 transformé au TU 160 ... Beau !

The most spectacular supersonic monster, beats the Concord any time, if not by performance at least by its looks. Just love it, it was the first one anyway.

@asensibleyoungman2978

2 жыл бұрын

Concorde is far more beautiful. The TU-144 looked like an amateur Concorde to me.

Great. The Power of Tupolev.

Amazing that it could fly

@F3HDemonDriver1

3 жыл бұрын

I could fly rather well, Just not economically.

The Ultimate Takeoff!

@F3HDemonDriver1

6 жыл бұрын

It's pretty impressive indeed Lizzie!

Cool 😊.

Какая красота,мощь и полёт конструкторской мысли!

Impressive “Concordfli” I mean the tupolev 144

Это что то, не вооброзимое. КРАСАВЕЦ.

AmAzinG .. pLaNeE..

Oh My God. They weren't kidding when they say that these were the loudest aircraft I bet from a distance you can tell which aircraft was getting ready to take off without looking at it

@Tequilasaur

6 ай бұрын

That isn't it's native engines here, they fly on NK-32s from TU-160 to make some tests

TUPOLEV TU-144 and CONCORDE: The first TUPOLEV TU-144 which flew on December 31, 1968 was indeed very similar of Concorde. It was a "proof of concept" model which was the TU-144A. The Soviets realized that this aircraft, which flew very well, could in no way be certified for civilian passenger transport because of its very high approach and landing speed. After a few test flights the Soviets came to the conclusion that another very different plane had to be built, the TU-144A was scrapped and they started to build the others, the TU-144B and after the C and D. Models C and D used important parts in titanium in an epoch metallurgy of this metal was unknown in the west reason why Concorde was only made in steel and aluminum (and this was the reason its cruise and maximum speed are the same and limited to mach 2 while the TU144 having its critical parts in titanium could cruise at mach 2.2 with a top speed of mach 2.35) . Double delta wings with strait leading edges would make easier to implement slats. Having engines near the center line close to the cabin it liberates the wing trailing hedge (a wingspan of 28.8 meters and 507 m² of wing area to be compared to 25.6 meters and 358 m² for Concorde) making it possible to have the significantly larger flaps all along the trailing edge that were necessary as having low speed in approach and landing that was the goal. Landing speed of Concorde was 305 km/h (165 kts) to be compared to 270km/h (146 kts) for the Tupolev that was indeed very similar of the Boeing 747 that was at time the fastest commercial plane landing. Another important difference was the width of the cabin more comfortable allowed the TU144 to have five seats up front while the Concorde only had four with seats next to the window being uncomfortable, only for people of below average height. Concorde flew in march 4, 1969 and Westerners (French and English) came to the same conclusions as the first version of soviets, it had a very high approach and landing speed, another plane had to be made. The French agreed to build another aircraft but the British did not. The new labor government led by new prime minister Harold Wilson begun to reorganize (and partly nationalize) the entire British aviation industry in what became later British Aerospace with the cancellation of many ongoing and operational projects. Cancelation of the TSR2 aircraft project (Supersonic Tactical & Reconnaissance Bomber) few weeks after its first flight was a serious blow to the Concorde project as it had the same Olympus 593 Concorde engines and had an early version of electric commands a kind of fly by wire but still of analog technology to be implemented in Concorde among other innovations. For the English a design of a new Concorde plane was not possible, they had to continue with the Concorde as it was in the state it was, with all its faults and problems due to design flaws, or else cancel it as the English wanted. The British government did everything to cancel the project, which was firmly opposed by French President George Pompidou. In February 1973 the Concorde project was virtually dead and in the process of being definitively cancelled. It was then the French president embarked to Azores in prototype number three on what is called the flight of last chance to Concorde for a meeting requested by the US President Richard Nixon. Nixon asked the French President to stop converting into gold each dollar entering in France because the US exits the Brenton Woods agreements and the dollar will no longer be convertible on the fixed price agreed in 1947. For his part, George Pompidou explained to Nixon the problem of the Concorde and the danger of having a more efficient Soviet competitor thanks to the use of new metals such as titanium. It was decided to continue the Concorde project as it was the first prototype, but a special committee was created to adopt a very special (and extremely expensive) approach and landing procedures were adopted especially for supersonic planes (but actually only for the Concorde). On approach it was necessary to create a gap in front of the Concorde, which made it impossible for 4 and sometimes 5 planes to land, which were sent to turn around or to a waiting circuit. In all air control centers, priority had to be given to the Concorde, it often arrived at its destination with just ten minutes of fuel in reserve, which was a safety aberration, all regulations require it to land with at least 45 minutes reserve. The French and British governments would pay enormous compensation, this was the price of prestige. Among other several design flaws one was the very great exposure of the kerosene tanks to projections from the landing gear were even the cause of many incidents but three accidents with significant leakage of kerosene, two in 1979, one in Dakar and the other in Washington/Dulles. In November 1981, the American National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) sent a letter of concern to the French BEA that included safety recommendations for Concorde. This communiqué was the result of the NTSB's investigations of four Air France Concorde incidents during a 20-month period from July 1979 to February 1981. The NTSB described those incidents as "potentially catastrophic," because they were caused by blown tyres during takeoff. During its 27 years in service, Concorde had about 70 tyre- or wheel-related incidents, seven of which caused serious damage to the aircraft or were potentially catastrophic. The most serious accident was in July 2000 in Gonesse (France) that caused 113 deaths and marked the end of the aircraft's prestige. This design flaw could be easily corrected on a second copy in prototype phase but … it didn’t happen . On the TU-144 such an accident would be impossible or would not have had the same consequences, projections from the landing gear were not in line with fuel tanks and these are protected by titanium pieces. IN SHORT : Concorde was an immature project, a version B or other was not possible mainly due to budgetary constraints from the British government, it flew for 27 years below important safety rules authorized through derogation obtained at the highest political level. However Concorde was the first operational plane with an early version of “fly by wire” commands (instead of hydraulics) and this was a great and important innovation in aviation very soon adopted by Airbus. The Tu144 was 11% heavier than Concorde but had 40% more wing surface (canards not included) and this made it having approach and landing speed comparable to existing commercial jets like the Boeing 747 and much lower than Concorde.(GM).

Geiler Sound

@F3HDemonDriver1

5 жыл бұрын

Danke Stefan!

*FEEL* *THE* *POWER* *OF* *USSR* 🇷🇺

@F3HDemonDriver1

5 жыл бұрын

Yes Indeed!

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

... Absolutely ... ,, she's VERY BEAUTYFUL aeroplane :)

@Kimjongil-pu6rk

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, but... a technical failure, basically.

@TheTeknus

4 жыл бұрын

It's like listening to bass boosted USSR anthem

@thethreestrikes3951

4 жыл бұрын

@@supersonic1246 Yeah she 😍

.. at least as loud as CONCORDE ... Thank you for sharing .. :) :)

I wish it could be restored to taxiing or flying

What years were they produced until?

Fucking insane the sound! I love it so much!!!

Classic orange exhaust.

@JIUNnF

Жыл бұрын

Закиси азота.

My left ear enjoyed this

Isso foi quando?

DRAGON MONSTER in the SKY

@F3HDemonDriver1

4 жыл бұрын

Loud dragon Monster Marcony!

UDMH fuel smoke?

great footage what year?

That's was nice but how much of the sound was from the Mig?

@Tengri30

2 жыл бұрын

Not that much I guess but MiG aircraft played a major role during development of the Tupolev. 😁

Idk what’s louder, this plane or my mom yelling lmao

@F3HDemonDriver1

3 жыл бұрын

Chuck . . .. You must have lost your hearing a Long time ago LOL

why do I feel like the tu-144 is faster than the concorde?

It didn't have the Afterburners ??

@Freddy22803

6 жыл бұрын

These engines have an afterburners - but as they from other plane (Tu-160 bomber), for take-off it isn't necessary to an afterburners

More badass than anything the US has built!

I recommend ear plugs during your flight.

@F3HDemonDriver1

5 жыл бұрын

Lol, You've gotta protect your hearing when around the TU-144.

@derekwall200

4 жыл бұрын

@@F3HDemonDriver1 even if you're flying inside it as a passenger the cabin noise was around 90-95 decibels and that was because of the cooling system. the concorde cabin noise is a lot quieter of course

Серийный номер?

Какой год?

Holy shit what a fucking beauty!

my teammates mic during an online match sounds like this!

Concorde: I produce a highest sound. TU-144: Put a lid over your ears 😎.

@mightyreptile3097

2 жыл бұрын

Saturn v: hold my loudness

@TheScottishPlaneSpotter

2 жыл бұрын

Vulcan bomber: hold my tea

That smoke trail is so *thick*

@F3HDemonDriver1

4 жыл бұрын

Very smokey Turbofans! Tupolev Didn't care about pollution when they designed the TU-144 LOL

@ShirtStacker

4 жыл бұрын

@@F3HDemonDriver1 yeah i wonder how much fuel this plane was burning when afterburners were on🤔

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

@@ShirtStacker at least minimum 10 litres/per second per reheated engine , just like Concorde did... :)

@ShirtStacker

4 жыл бұрын

@@supersonic1246 thats a lot of fuel

Hi Concordski!

I love and miss that noise from noisy jet engines. The dont make them like that anymore.

@1mchartmann

2 жыл бұрын

Thank God. Nothing like overly noisy unreliable fuel guzzling Russian engines.

“Me when I rage”

Whats that other thing in the sky

@supersonic1246

2 жыл бұрын

MIG 29 chase and observator Fighter-Plane ...

How much fuel needs this aircraft?

@F3HDemonDriver1

5 жыл бұрын

Thousands and thousands of gallons Jan!

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

... 25000 litres plus ,, per flying-hour ...

How much fuel did it burn?

@supersonic1246

2 жыл бұрын

... 25000 litres per hour ... !!

@Yessir1506

Жыл бұрын

@@supersonic1246 is that for tu-144LL or plain ol soviet TU-144

that it plane or rocket because very lord

@F3HDemonDriver1

7 жыл бұрын

Very Loud indeed!

@shhnydur3001

7 жыл бұрын

RC DemonDriver probably louder than concorde!

Вот это я понимаю звук! До чего ж красив чертяга! =)))

The 144 is the coolest looking SST in my opinion

10.000 gallon per hour 😱

and I though the Concorde had dirty exhaust... look at all of that yellow smoke from the exhaust of the TU-144, GROSS!!!

Looks familiar somehow

El monstro sovietico

Yea, that doesn’t look like an accident waiting to happen.

Passenger supersonic with black Jack's power.

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

... ja , this takeoff is Black Jet NK-32(1) power ... but no passenger ,, just measurement-systems and technicians ...

@ilya.kortev

4 жыл бұрын

@@supersonic1246 By the way, it took off without afterburner. Night take off Tu-160: kzread.info/dash/bejne/gmmuxqp_pNbQnqQ.html

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

@@ilya.kortev ... fine link , thank you for this ..

This clearly isn’t in the original Aeroflot livery with the Soviet flag. Are some of these planes still in service

@spongebubatz

3 жыл бұрын

It was used for test flights by NASA in cooperation with the Russian equivalent (I think) but only until the early 2000s or so

Most of the sound here comes from the accompanying airplane

@randylahey2242

4 жыл бұрын

No

Наша песня ещё не спета. Мы ещё споём

I read passengers had to wear ear protection whilst on board.

Fun fact: that orange smoke is NO gas. If memory serves, many Russian aircraft actually use nitrous oxide (AKA nitro) to boost their engines for takeoff: NO gas is an exhaust byproduct with a distinct rust/orange colour. American aircraft did not adopt this system due to the toxicity of nitrogen monoxide.

@JIUNnF

Жыл бұрын

SR71

That woke up my neighbors 😂

@F3HDemonDriver1

4 жыл бұрын

Mine too! Lol

@sovetski8893

4 жыл бұрын

@@F3HDemonDriver1 I didn't give a shit 👍😭

@lery1968

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂

@F3HDemonDriver1

4 жыл бұрын

🤣👍

Sounds like a SR-71 Blackbird on takeoff.

@F3HDemonDriver1

5 жыл бұрын

Your right . .. . It does Indeed Sir.

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

... yes, i had this in mind , too .

…and it was even louder inside

судя по дыму рядом там был МиГ-29

Marvellous piece of engineering... love USSR...love Russia...

@pelicanair2048

2 жыл бұрын

I dunno if you'd wanna love the USSR...

@1mchartmann

2 жыл бұрын

Stupid, might as well love Nazi Germany. There both in the same league.

@Yessir1506

Жыл бұрын

@@pelicanair2048 Russia is just a piece of shit after the Soviet dissolution yk

Sound like Tupolev Tu-160M

@Yessir1506

Жыл бұрын

Great guess because it actually uses TU-160 engines, which notoriously release the orange gas when the plane is taking off

Looks like french Concorde

Oh look it's the ThankYoulev Ty-144

Wow!!! The Russian Concord.. It Looks kind of better..

@F3HDemonDriver1

7 жыл бұрын

Hi Pat, I love them both about the same, but the TU-144 maidened a month or two before the Concorde did.

@aleksandrsvalisevskis2039

6 жыл бұрын

It was rushed into testing a month before Concorde due to political reasons, despite the safety issues. As a results many people have died, but it was kind of norm for Soviet Union. It also operated for less than a year because of multiple crashes and critical failures.

@Tengri30

5 жыл бұрын

@@aleksandrsvalisevskis2039 You know something funny and sad at the same time? The Tu and the Concorde crashed in Paris and the crashsites are lying just about 2km apart from each other. Both planes were failures, the Concorde was kept in the air because BA & AF got them with tax money and for luxury purposes, it created massive media coverage. But in the end, the plane never made real money, neither did the Tu-144. They are both legends in aviation and somehow like brothers with a similar fate. And nothing similar was developed since them and propably it will never happen. At least the Concorde got a better treatment in the western world, trying to keep them in musuems and keep them in good condition. The Tu? some of them were scrapped to sell the metal, 2 or 3 are in musuems but they aren't kept in good condition and only one of them (CCCP-77115) is in a good condition. And one is standig next to the Concorde in the Sinsheim Musuem, Germany.

@supersonic1246

4 жыл бұрын

@@Tengri30 Yes , Sinsheim is CCCP-77112 .. :)

Its a supersonic bomber, but without bombs

Brasil

Any still flying?

@F3HDemonDriver1

7 жыл бұрын

Well Yes and No, . . Tupelov keeps one as a test bed that NASA used as an SST test bed in the 1990's.

@Whitpusmc

7 жыл бұрын

+F3HDemonDriver OK, cool. Probably extremely expensive to operate.

@supersonic1246

2 жыл бұрын

No, not anymore . Last flight of this TU-144 LL and at all was 14. April 1999 ... !! Grets from Hamburg

Bloody hell lol Is that an earthquake or a maniacal plane taking off? 😂😂 Look at it! Looks like a vulture taking off, sinister yet sensational