"This is what would happen if the USS Zumwalt fought a Russian battlecruiser" ......still waiting to hear what would happen.

@blakecochran7101

6 жыл бұрын

the USS Zumwalt would probably destroy a Russian battlecruiser

@smittywerbenjaegermanjense2350

6 жыл бұрын

The USS Zumwalt could probably destroy the entire Russian Navy and all of the tug boats that keep it moving lmaooo!

@ZJ6865

6 жыл бұрын

Smitty Werbenjaegermanjensen very very well said!😂😂😂

@spritezeroxxx66

6 жыл бұрын

Battleships are shit. A quiet nuclear submarine can sink an entire carrier group, and Russia has some extremely good submarines. If a German diesel electric can sneak past U.S. ASW-Ships and get into position to fire onto an aircraft carrier (which it did during a wargame), a couple of Russian subs are gonna fuck any american boat up.

@Vortex1988

6 жыл бұрын

SpriteZero Xxx good thing the Americans have more subs than Russia.

I hate everyone who uses robo voices on videos.

@zCr1sx

5 жыл бұрын

Agreed

@StarSwisss

5 жыл бұрын

And those that add a ton of unedited footage of a ship to hit 10 minutes. Edit: and get ads for it

@aasailor

5 жыл бұрын

Then don't listen to them.

@leiadair7800

5 жыл бұрын

same

@Sarah-gl9ng

5 жыл бұрын

Meh doesn't bother me

Both ships break down before leaving port.

@jamesbrown5600

6 жыл бұрын

These ships are undergoing the same kinds of growing pains every new class of ships goes through.

@shawn97006

6 жыл бұрын

No. Tumblehome designs have been around for a hundred years.....there are reasons you don't use it is warships. There is no way on this design to eliminate the electronic interference between certain systems...you can use one or the other. Other ships in service around the world suffer this problem too. It comes from a cramped design. You can not fix having the VLS system mounted on the sides....where water can get right at them along with any kind of say collision damage. The list can go on but you get the picture. I might point out that the class is CANCELLED. Burke production is being extended as they can at least sail when the weathers bad.

@jamesavery6671

6 жыл бұрын

There's got to be something to it to pour that much money in it. The engineers aren't exactly stupid.

@Crankiebox99

5 жыл бұрын

Lol true

@informationoverload2487

5 жыл бұрын

@@shawn97006 That isn't a factor or they wouldn't have invested so much money

There is no ammunition for those front two guns! "AGS can only use ammunition designed specifically for the system. Only one ammunition type was designed, and the Navy halted its procurement in November 2016 due to cost ($800,000 to $1,000,000 per round), so the AGS has no ammunition and cannot be used."

So....what would happen?.....apart from stopping just outside port.

@olengagallardo8551

3 ай бұрын

Make sure to have lots of spares n mechanics on board😂

Didn't that ship breakdown & left the sailors stranded without power in 2018? 😂😂😂

The Russian tend to keep their surface fleets close to home for ton of different reasons so a Zumwalt class would have to go to the battle cruiser which would give it a huge disadvantage. They would never be in open water by themselves so to pit one against the other in a heads up battle is dump. Both are warship, both capable of sinking one another. Its not about one platform over the other, it is more about how well each platform function in the greater whole of each navy.

the zumwalt needs a tug to follow it around just in case it breaks down again...lol

'This is what would happen if the USS Zumwalt fought a Russian battlecruiser' - It sits in habour while they play with the inflatable.At least get your titles to reflect video content.

@nammie12345

6 жыл бұрын

And dont forget, playing with their blue plastic guns too.

@michaelmoody9145

6 жыл бұрын

Not only do the deploy inflatable boats but they also sail past supporting civilians with a police escort!!

@AlphaCollects

6 жыл бұрын

Ikr

@n1vfd1239

6 жыл бұрын

"US Defense news" is probably some dot head kid sitting in his mud hut stealing video to put this crap together.

@adamorick2872

6 жыл бұрын

Norm T do you realize an aircraft carrier is the size of a town with a matching population. And as for stores from my knowledge it's simply afres, aka a ship board px

"The pee otter bell icky eye" smh

How about a video of what would happen if the Zumwalt were to fight a Russian trawler!

@tabasco7031

5 жыл бұрын

Is this before, or after Discovery Channel turns the Zumfault into a crab boat?

@orencio1969

5 жыл бұрын

the fishes will sink the zumwalt

I...can't...stand...his...robotic...voice...does...not...compute...

@bricub72

6 жыл бұрын

Blue screen of death

@randallmacdonald4851

6 жыл бұрын

As soon as I heard the artificial voice I stopped the video, came to the comments to find this comment and voice my disgust, as well. I DON'T WATCH VIDEOS WITH ARTIFICIAL VOICED NARRATORS. Ever. Never. Not gonna do it.

@philb5593

6 жыл бұрын

This one is actually much better than others I've heard, but it isn't great

@kennethrussell4664

6 жыл бұрын

Randall MacDonald agree

@johnpatz8395

5 жыл бұрын

Yep, I agree completely, if they can't be bothered to actually read it, then I can't be bothered to actually watch it.

Just for the record the Zumwalts stealth capability gives it a radar cross section approximately equal to a ocean going fishing vessel and thus is intended to allow thix ship to blend into the existing battle group, not disappear. The Zumwalts posseses some very advanced technologies that almost certainly will be incorporated into future warship desighn, however this class of vessel does not have a clear mission and is prohibitively expensive, limiting it's run to just three ships. On a final note the US surface fleet is carrier centered giving the United States Navy an almost unfair advantage over the Russians, truth be told in the open ocean no Russian cruiser coul get close enough to the Zumwalt to be a threat before being destroyed by carrier based aircraft.

@abc64pan

6 жыл бұрын

Carriers are not meant for facing Russia or China, they are meant for supporting America's endless "nation building" and "regime change" wars which support the Industrial Military Complex and insure its existence. People really need to pay attention to current events.

@jamesferguson5279

6 жыл бұрын

abc64pan , Actually you seem very uninformed on Naval Warefare, let me help you out, here are the basics. Naval Warefare can be divided into three essential missions. First is Sea Control, this historically has been perfomed by Capitol ships such as Battleships or thier more recent replacements, Aircraft Carriers but also can be performed by a variety of smaller surface combatants such as Cruisers or Destroyers, the idea is to establish sea dominance over a particular area extending both above and below the surface, typically perfomed by a task group acting synergetically . The Second Mission is Sea Denial, this has been primarily performed by Submarines but also sea mines and ground based bombers and even fast attack boats have performed this role. Finally support, this can be perfomed by just about any ship but has been most successful when performed by Carriers. Aircraft Carriers due to their size and flexibility generally can perform the Sea Control and Support much better then any other type of weapon system, which is why all Naviee want them. Now you know something about the subject matter, frankly I don't understand why some people usually Pacifist Liberals feel the need to comment on things they obviously have no knowledge of, I don't know anything about the Russian Ballet so I refain from offering my opinion on it but lack of facts just doesn't seem to stop you people, odd.

@ausintune9014

6 жыл бұрын

It's a early ship of its class, it's not gonna be a good one.

@philipbasler5077

6 жыл бұрын

like the arleigh burk, tyconderoga, f-15, abrams, cobra, etc...?

@jamesferguson5279

6 жыл бұрын

Philip basler, you'll have to be specific, each weapon system you named have entirely different roles and that includes the Arleigh Burke class which is intended primarily for Area Air Defence. The Zumwalt was originally intended as a post Cold War era ground support ship. Due to the protracted time this ship was in development the Navy decided to test numerous new technologies on it and many seem to work great. However usually when a ship undergoes extensive redesighn, costs escalate. This is why I expect to see many new techonogies the Zumwalt makes use of in other future ships. Whether or not this was the best move by the Navy, only time will tell.

Would love to see footage of this ship in heavy seas. Can't be sure but to me that hull looks like it would be awful in bad weather and rough water.

@Xeraghusta

2 жыл бұрын

Apparently not. Its hull design is supposedly very good in bad weather. I believe the reason that style of hull isn't really used is because if it takes on water it is likely to capsize

@daquan7868

2 жыл бұрын

They test it in Alaskan seas and it did better that expected, it's just that it's way to expensive

@sdhtmt

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah it probably fashion over functional..

@daquan7868

2 жыл бұрын

@@sdhtmt It's highly functional with the usual mechanical problems from a new design but with all the lastest outfits or can be outfitted with a verity of weapons. It's just highly expensive sort of like the F-22 they put a cap on that because it exceeded it's budget during design and manafacturing when we have planes already better than anything in the sky and the F-22s are straight overkill. That's what you got with the Zumalt only during it's design and manafacturing it took "doing to much" to new level

@houstontexas9463

2 жыл бұрын

Actually opposite.. It's way more stable, that's one of the main aspects of ship building, its a battleship it had to stay afloat.

seems like it is basically just a giant stealth cruise missile carrier

Before that it will probably collide with a shipping container.

@user-uv4xm1lw9c

3 жыл бұрын

Cant wait for that to happen

@ninonicebx

3 жыл бұрын

Lmfao. Exactly right. Oh man. Thats great.

@richardschauf7373

3 жыл бұрын

No joke! With all the electronic shit they have you would think they could spot a 600 ft cargo ship 50-100 miles away? How can you not notice and change course? Nuts! Somebody isnt awake!

@theabyssofmemes8538

3 жыл бұрын

@@richardschauf7373 Not a ship, a little container.

4:16 Imagine someone with a gaming setup like that in their bedroom.

I didnt hear what would happen if they fought

This is so cool, with all items storing inside the ship.. The angle side helps deflect raar incoming up vs back to surface ship it was sent from.

That is absolutely the sickest boat ever.

It looks like a raft with a shed on top.

On paper or video game, esay win,but in real combat is another story

@prosperii3749

6 жыл бұрын

elcormoran1 that goes for Russias shit too.....

@abc64pan

6 жыл бұрын

Combat with who? A guy driving a "technical" pick-up truck with a gun in the rear? When was the last time we faced an equally armed navy in combat, 1945?

@b.thomas8926

6 жыл бұрын

That's kind of the point, isn't it? Systems like this deter other Navy's from attempting anything. However, that does not mean I support the system. I think its way over priced, the rail-gun system that was one of it's flagship weapon systems proved not to be cost effective, and the ship's seaworthiness is questionable. I think the Navy would have done better by purchasing more cruisers and updating its air fleets.

@mikewilson3497

6 жыл бұрын

elcormoran1 /

@ArthurSilva-ky9km

6 жыл бұрын

elcormoran1 .and

I guess the message was the Zumwalt would bore it death. Well done. The boredom nearly killed me.

How about 2 guys in a rubber raft with some tnt?

Seen that ship blocking the Panama canal a couple years ago; broke down.

Thumbnail reminds me of The Monitor vs The Merrimac battle.

I feel like that is only the firepower they let the public know about. They probably have some crazy shit to fuck enemies shit up with.

If these two ships fighting each other somebody fucked up their navigational beacon

This ship without its towing boat can’t go anywhere.

@solidsnake6206

5 жыл бұрын

Sounds like some other Russian ship I know only it needs 2 tugs to keep er going Cough cough Russian cough cough carrier cough

@jonathanrangel7036

5 жыл бұрын

solid snake I was about to bring up the Russian aircraft carrier as well 😂

these days ship versus ship are from GPS from other means and shoot from hundreds of miles away.

@djones9122

6 жыл бұрын

Dr Bendover yea they said that in Vietnam we don't need bullet's we have missiles

@daleanderson7794

6 жыл бұрын

GPS means nothing unless you know where your looking.

@drbendover7467

6 жыл бұрын

global hawk through X Band Satellite Communication to a ship.

@neil2385

6 жыл бұрын

do you take your boyfriend's missile up your tailpipe Doc ?

@drbendover7467

6 жыл бұрын

SpursSpursSpurs Audere est Facere the type 45 destroyer is a British one, isn't it.

We're comparing a destroyer to a cruiser meant to shoot down aircraft, now tell me, who will win, an AA platoon or a mortar squad?

@jtkoontz69

3 жыл бұрын

the kirov is designed to taken on ships its heavy armored 827ft in length during the cold War the Iowas class battleships were actually sent out with their own battle groups with 4 arleigh burkes and 2 Ticonderoga missiles hunt them down

@splendid9910

3 жыл бұрын

Hm, didn't know, though the guy in the video said that it's heavily equiped with surface to air armaments 1:31, but it did have anti ship missles.

Where is this located? It's like I'm going back in time looking at all of those people riding around in their old vintage boats.

We are still waiting to see if it can get it's ass outa port

I lasted until 1:43, then the robo-voice finally drove me away

Navy Saylor with blue Rifles are absolute Art work

@lewislinzy3437

3 жыл бұрын

They're probably BB guns.

Both ships will dock for repair and both navy crew will go grab a beer together. That’s pretty much what I’m getting from this video.

you don't need a USS Zumwalt Destroyer to sink a Russian navy ship. All you need is Tractor from an Ukranian farmer

A destroyer it ain't...more for shore offensives to replace the Iowa battlecruisers. A pair of 30mm chain guns for close defense...brutal. We don't even know if not having a bow hurts it in rough seas...we will see if this was a $4-6 billion dollar per ship was genius or a boondoggle.

@wackokicker

6 жыл бұрын

that was my thinking... what would happen if a very high wave takes on her starboard?

@peterson7082

6 жыл бұрын

?

@scotthares

6 жыл бұрын

Ask California's resident clown Jerry Brown about billion dollar boondoggles.

@sharkypotter9468

6 жыл бұрын

Lol what’s a boondoggle

@user-ze6mi1xu1p

6 жыл бұрын

Iowa class battleSHIPS

I love how you purpose extended the video,

The Zumwalt doesn’t have guns that work. It just tells the enemy their uniforms are outdated.

Very good ship, Uncle Sam

@aerialadventure7907

5 жыл бұрын

Artem Ryapolov your in a fantasy world, hopefully you have nothing to do with procurement

A destroyer that would take on a battlecruiser? One of the 2 Battleships designations? The one oversized DD that was stripped of her missiles? Would make a nice target practice for 15' guns

This video has great close ups of the Zumwalt

I did not know that the two lumps at the front of the ship, transformed into guns. That's cool

I refuse to watch and listen to the worst computer-generated audio

Another case of Let's spend more for less.

Zumwalt is not even meant to battle a kirov or slava class. It is meant to replace the Iowa-cass in offshore support.

A surface combatants vessel that opted to be stealthy rather than robust and to carry out the surface combatants roles where it's impossible to avoid combat completely altogether. Paradox.

Let's see, it has 2 guns that were supposed to be the centerpiece but are useless as the navy has no ammo for them. A stealth design that many experts believe not to be seaworthy, the superstructure is made of compressed wood, let's see how that handles weapons hits. Has no anti ship capabilities(Tomahawk anti ship missile are still years away from testing much less deployment). Then, what exactly is this thing supposed to do? It makes enough power to support a railgun, that who knows will become an operational weapon, still very much in the R&D stage. Ok, so it gets a railgun, but what good is that, if the ship can't get to where it needs to be? So it's basically a testbed for future ships. A very very expensive testbed.

@monarchist1633

6 жыл бұрын

Vin496 well sayed👏👌✌️

@coronal2207

5 жыл бұрын

I might be wrong but I think TASMs are already used extensively by subs for anti-ship warefare.

@stevenhembree6891

5 жыл бұрын

This ship is for attacking points of interest on land . It's not exactly a battleship . I mean it is but it's not for fighting other ships . It takes out our enemies important land targets .

@coronal2207

5 жыл бұрын

@@stevenhembree6891 They advertised it as more than that, and paid for more than that

@johnathanpindak6167

5 жыл бұрын

the us is now producing a new high tech cruise missile called the JASSM-XR and has a range of 1,000 miles

Don't think much of that design, a grossly oversized tower a easy target, there are no safety rails on deck, not good in rough seas.

@cameik

6 жыл бұрын

I agree, the shape goes against most hydrodynamic principles, just like the stealth fighter went against airodynamic principles, it looks like it would try to dive under huge waves encountered at sea, instead of riding over them... If this didn't try to sink it, it would definitely stop its forward progress cold... This looks to be a fairweather boat...

40 seconds of verbal analysis and 10 minutes of feel-good pictures.

A destroyer without weapons... even the guns are not ready

that's easy, zumwalt sinks

This video is very weak... You really only ask, who is the stealthest?

@ethan41623

6 жыл бұрын

brit boy it's not that stealthy if we know about it

@raw1465

6 жыл бұрын

That's like me and you, you have a .500 magnum revolver. I have my .38 Spcl. revolver. But I'm quieter and can get the jump on you. Your big gun is useless if I attack first because chances are, I'll hit my target.

@beerhunter2814

6 жыл бұрын

Pretty much whoever is spotted first and engages has the upper hand

@Orimbar

6 жыл бұрын

Yup. Ther is still a "if this works" question.

This Ship needs Dazzle Camouflage too. You can't jam binoculars, but you can fool the eye! :-)

that's one crazy design

Unfortunately, the shaft seal leaks. it had to be towed from the Panama Canal.

@TonyNque

6 жыл бұрын

I wonder if the Tug is also invisible to radar ???? - just asking ....

@mrridley8967

6 жыл бұрын

Tony Newitt lol I think it is

@nightlightabcd

6 жыл бұрын

It's American made, what did you expect. The USS Ford, the F-35 need I say more!

@automandan

6 жыл бұрын

Ad Mirer It's amazing you like to bring up the shaft issues with the zumwalt people seem to forget that Russia has an aircraft carrier that breaks down even more than the Zumwalt hell it needs a sea going tug just to sail next to it in case it does break down and that vessel was built in the 1980s and still breaks down police design wall is being fixed and it is being improved each time people seem to forget this is a state-of-the-art ship it's never been used before it's a new class of vessel so it's going to have some issues and people seem to not get that oh well you can't fix stupid you can't fix stupid that's all I got to say.

@bootymane9907

6 жыл бұрын

Dan the car man The thing is the US Military has a 665 Billion dollars a year to build a new fleet of F-35s and finish the F-22 Raptor fleet.

Yeah I'm not buying it. After everything I've read about the Dumwalt I'd be very surprised if it was ever sent into a situation where it may have to defend itself. The fact that there was originally supposed to be 32 and this was ultimately reduced to just 3 ships says far more than can ever be said here. Of course that's not so say it can't play a role. It could always be used as ahhhh ummmm......sorry I got nothing.

@kuninagako9035

5 жыл бұрын

They only made one the rest are cancelled now and its being towed to a scrap yard to be taken apert for it material for the new ship thats coming out

Another text to speech program. Because reading it aloud yourself is so hard.

FINALY! They Know How To Make Their Wepons Color blue!

Zumwalt is an expensive joke...sort of like the first 200 Lightning IIs. Our military and it’s procurement system have become a national liability.

@peterson7082

6 жыл бұрын

+J. Wilson How so? Elaborate beyond these simplistic claims.

@astralwerks4

6 жыл бұрын

A U.S. Air Force official tells Popular Mechanics that, "the Air Force plans to upgrade all aircraft in question to Software Block 3F."

@americannotamericant1773

6 жыл бұрын

J. Wilson you don’t know how it will fight, so I suggest keeping your mouth shut until we use it.

@larskennedy1849

6 жыл бұрын

Can you supply any links? Same with you Spooky where the navy has said this because i've watched lightning II's development and last i heard it's being tested still but from what i hear as of the Red Flag Wargames where it racked up a 20:1 kill ratio only losing 1 plane it's doing quite well. As well as being able to function as a secondary command and control asset based on the fact it's onboard computers where creating real time work simulations of the battle flow and was able work against them. Last i read there was also and article going along the lines of something like. Wargames are too easy for the Lightning II's. So i'm just curious about what information you both are looking. I didnt much like this plane either but so far the results that 1 trillion dollar plus funded seems to be working out. Oh yeah and lets not forget F-15s, F-16s BVR shot limit is 30 miles these shoot BVR 160 mile with their advance computers and avionics. They were so valuable in Red Flag based on their computers compiling data that legacy craft like F-16s, F-15s and F-22s request some of them stay on to do just that and only that after they ran out of munitions. Hardly sounds like junk. But have to wait to see more. I'm still on the fence. Especially now that the DOD is ordering 2,456 of them

Looks a bit like something from the civil war ( not sure about the grey colour )))

@ronaldmajor6624

6 жыл бұрын

Jim Clarke that's exactly what I thought. The ironclads.

@machia0705

6 жыл бұрын

Jim Clarke Yes ! A monitor !

@1950Chimaera

6 жыл бұрын

Looks a lot like one of those old flatirons, the ones before the electric models, I mean

@timothyterrell1658

5 жыл бұрын

@bob bobo monitor was a good fighting ship, It just wasn't sea worthy. Had they not left the ballistic shells on the dock. They could have sunk the maramack. Had they known how to use sloped armor. They would have been immune to Confederate guns. In return if Maramack knew they could up the powder change of they're guns they could have sank the monitor.

@IvanNava

5 жыл бұрын

Ironclad

In some way it kind of reminds one of a iron clad they used in the civil war. On outside appearance of them.

damn that thing is big

Like Lenin said, "Quantity has a Quality all its own." Its y these POS Frigates have been canceled & more Arleigh Burkes are to be built.

@kdrapertrucker

3 жыл бұрын

These aren't frigates, you are thinking of the littoral combat ships which have have matured into decent ships. This is a very large stealth destroyer.

This is what would happen if the USS Zumwalt fought a Russian battlecruiser... Russian ship sinks THE END!

@georgeeverette3912

6 жыл бұрын

No, it is not the end. Then the second Russian cruiser has a target lock because they can build ten cruisers for the price of one Zumwalt. This is how the Russians took out German Tiger tanks with T34/85 tanks AND WON THE WAR!

@kareemhaddad3788

5 жыл бұрын

@@georgeeverette3912 yes 10 t34/85 vs tiger

@kuninagako9035

5 жыл бұрын

Problem zumwalt has 0 ammo for it and no misslies all it can do is ram and sink plus they only made one and cancelled the rest of them and the one built is now headed to to be scraped for the new warships coming up

@cptrandom3768

5 жыл бұрын

SPOILERS!!!

@ONW4V3R

5 жыл бұрын

Boys i think you missunderstood 2 things: 1. "Battlecruiser" are not battle cruiser, they're a underclass of a battleship. 2. The zum is huges and slow for a destroyer ,and as history show, slow and big targets are the way to go for battleship. Bonus: The zum dont even have a single missile in the end so....

That looks so futuristic.

@phantomwraith1984

4 жыл бұрын

It's ugly

Wow the Zumwalt is a formidable looking Destroyer!

Ok 1 hit on the brige and the hole ship cant fire or move or 1 hit on the Generator and the railguns cant fire

@peterson7082

6 жыл бұрын

?

@MrDuckblaster

6 жыл бұрын

I'm curious how you know rayo kill is Jewish? Also, he must have never served aboard a warship. If he did he would know that all shipboard controls have backups and local controls, plus damage control and non power requiring voice communications throughout the ship.

@jamesbrown5600

6 жыл бұрын

There is no radar in the world that can detect a Zumwalt until its to late. The Zumi would have launched it anti-ship attack long before any Russian or Chinese ship knew they had even been detected. The only kind of shots that Russian or Chinese ships will get off against a Zumwalt are "bearing only solution" shots. Basically they'll shoot their anti-ship missiles in the direction they see the Zumwalt's missiles coming from, if they have enough time after detecting the incoming missile strike. If the Zumwalt is firing stealthy missiles, they will not be detected until the final few seconds of flight and they would not have a chance to fire any anti-ship missiles back at the Zumi. If the inbounds are non-stealthy anti-ship missiles, they'll detect them as they come over the horizon approx 12nm and that will give the ship 1 minute to program and fire as many anti-ship missiles back at the Zumi as they can, I would estimate between 6 and 12 missiles would be successfully fired and that isn't close to as many as are needed to overwhelm the Zumwalt's defensive systems, but there is such a thing as a lucky shot too. If a missile were to leak through and actually hit a Zumi, of course it would kill many sailors and cause much damage, but the ship would likely survive. No navy does damage control better than the US navy.

@Rumbler298

6 жыл бұрын

"If a missile were to leak through and actually hit a Zumi, of course it would kill many sailors and cause much damage, but the ship would likely survive" good sir have you ever seen a P-700 Granit? (AKA SS-N-19 "Shipwreck") a single hit from those and it's game over for the zumwalt. the P-700 is so large it looks like a fighter jet with 750kg warhead compared to the harpoon's 200kg. the russian battlecruiser has 20+ of those missiles and it only needs one to decimate the zumi. A 1v1 end up zumi loosing. A strike group and coordinated attack must be employed to counter the russian Kirov-class battlecuiser

@harveybarnes1718

6 жыл бұрын

sTinger Can't hit what you can't see. The Russians will be hit before they even know there is a missile.

What would happen if the USS Zumwalt fought a Russian battlecruiser? It will join fleet of subs in a few minutes and entertain a fish )

@jamesbrown5600

6 жыл бұрын

It's doubtful the Russian battleship would ever detect a Zumwalt, so its doubtful the Russian would ever get a shot off that had any chance of hitting a Zumi. You can't hit what you can't see. This video said one thing that is true in every kind of modern combat; the side that sees the other side first and gets off the first shot usually wins

@drperky7008

6 жыл бұрын

eddie money the amount of stupidity you just said is off the charts

@alexbaird214

6 жыл бұрын

swigity swooty Any when you think about it, all the countries that have these brand new ship designs brag about them such as the Germans and Japanese hyping up their new ships (bismark and yamato), yet they have a knack for being one of the largest targets in the water and no matter how much they tried to hide these prized ships, the enemy persistently hunted them down. If this ship was ever in combat, it would be one of the first targets and I would guarantee you that it wouldnt be hard to find with Russias technological advances the are coming up with.

@saintnsinner6378

6 жыл бұрын

eddie money If you listened to the video, the Russian radar, although powerful, is a neon sign to ships especially designed to stealth classifications. Having worked on radar systems anything (Including both ships) can be detected. Having fought in Vietnam it's usually young stupid kids who've never fought who brag about "this can defeat that." How brilliantly stupid anyone is who wants to see the next war.

@gordonthomson1427

6 жыл бұрын

Unless they have the best air defense systems , like Russia . It's one thing to launch your missiles , but it's another thing to get them there , and Russian air defense systems are far ahead of anything the US has . Same applies to your wonderful stealth aircraft . Their missiles still need to penetrate the Russian air defense systems .. . .

The bridge is so exposed to enemy fire because of how big it is plus making it hard for the ship to escape from enemy fire due to how heavy it is

Built In My Home State, And One Other! Awesome!!!

I’ll take the Missouri

@demonbot6617

4 жыл бұрын

good luck, you'll need it

Waste of money

@laetrille

6 жыл бұрын

Waste of a comment

@asp1od

6 жыл бұрын

The use of the rail-gun was abandoned due to unresolved issues (energy) and the horrendous cost of the project ($ 500 million) and the projectiles. A ship Costs about $ 7 billion ... more than an aircraft carrier

@TheKillerDonat

6 жыл бұрын

Michael Vechnak Ever thought about your shitty medical System?

@TheKillerDonat

6 жыл бұрын

I live in Norway and what you're telling is bullshit. I dont know if youre that stupid by yourself or just brainwashed by the media but muslims dont want war...

@derricklanders1205

6 жыл бұрын

TheKillerDonat Could it be that in Norway you're being fed bullshit and fairytales? ...and the US Healthcare system is one of the best in the world...don't know how many people are flocking to Norway to get a medical Degree or training.

If their is one thing that the American military learned from the Vietnam defeat it was that you do not start an armed conflict with an opponent who has the same sized club.

I found those M16s the most funniest. Looked as if toys with that bluish camo. 😂😂😂😂 And I had thought this video to be some kind of stimulation but🙄🙄

Or we could have health care.

@RojoFern

6 жыл бұрын

Nah

@dennissmith6783

6 жыл бұрын

I will take the ship since the health care sucks

@jeffcampbell6298

6 жыл бұрын

Jack Fenton Ain’t that the truth!!

@sjm7518

6 жыл бұрын

Hyperbole

@antiglobaljoel532

6 жыл бұрын

The government can’t balance their spending (like the rest of us have to do) but you’re ok with them being in charge of our health?

IT DOESNT STAND A CHANCE AGAINST THE RUSSIAN PETER THE GREAT

@elementalmstar2392

6 жыл бұрын

IT ONLY TAKES ON BRAHMOS ANTI SHIP MISSLE TO CHOP IT INTO PIECES

@konankankahoba2055

6 жыл бұрын

ELEMENTAL MSTAR, you really need to cheer yourself up by dreaming, you must come back down to earth, THE RUSSIAN PETER THE GREAT has no chance against Uncle SAM. THE RUSSIAN PETER THE GREAT has a weakest maritime fleet of OCEAN !! SO STOP TO DREAM MY SMALL RUSSIAN PETER THE GREAT !!!

@elementalmstar2392

6 жыл бұрын

WELL YOU NEED TO MAKE IT WORK FIRST..HOW MANY TIMES DID UNCLE SAM BREAK DOWN ...I AM TALKING OF FACTS HERE..

@konankankahoba2055

6 жыл бұрын

ELEMENTAL MSTAR, You Russian what do you have as a development policy for your lousy naval force ????? NIET NIET NIET. THE RUSSIAN PETER THE GREAT has no experience, no knowledge, no technology in the manufacture of strategic war ships, add to that a scary lack of money to realize their dream. Here are facts that reflect a disturbing reality of THE RUSSIAN PETER THE GREAT. In this area ONCLE SAM IS HYPER IN ADVANCE ON HIS TIME AS THE USA HAVE MONEY TO MAKE AND DEVELOP POWERFUL MILITARY NAVAL AND AERIAL TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS WHAT MAKES THE ONCLE SAM THE FIRST WORLD MILITARY POWER (SEA / EARTH / AIR) . What makes the RUSSIAN PETER THE GREAT extremely jealous and can only be reduced to criticism and whining as they are used to doing it.THE RUSSIAN PETER THE GREAT would be better off focusing on his unique aircraft carrier on which the pilots need to train at landing and take off as they spend all their time falling at sea especially at night.

@elementalmstar2392

6 жыл бұрын

WELL ITS LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING YOU DIDN'T KNOW ..PETER THE GREAT IS THE ONLY MILITARY SHIP ON THIS PLANET THAT HAS ALWAYS 3 TARGETING SATELLITES ABOVE IT ..JOKES ASIDE ..ITS THE ONLY BATTLE SHIP ON THE FACE OF THIS PLANET ..IT HAS CANNONS OF THE HIGHEST RANGE, AND THE MISSILES YOU FEAR MOST..SO ..ITS THE ONLY SHIP WITH PORTABLE RADAR SYSTEM..ITS SATELLITE CAN LOCK ANY TARGET ANYWHERE AND THE SHIPS JOB IS TO LAUNCH THE MISSILE..

What would happen if it quit collecting coffee grounds and actually deployed with a battle group?

Seeing war like this is like seeing chess as empty board with pawn against pawn lol.

Drones and railgun totally changed war at sea. . New era of techno combat

@markdoldon8852

6 жыл бұрын

pmay222 pretty sure railguns have changed nothing, especially when those won't even begin deployment for another 10 yrs.

@pmay222

6 жыл бұрын

Mark Doldon the fact we even know of railguns tells me they have it sorted, its US thats 10 years behind the tech. . How l8ng they have stealth bombers before one crashed revealing their hand, even then they had mkii batwing version already. . We have seen stuff in the sky at night that is unbelievably fast like u could not imagine, they are way ahead in the game

That thing looks like my 2 yr old thought it up. I'm certain I have a drawing somewhere

What is not mentioned is what happened to two of our destroyers/frigates over near Korea. They were both hit with a sophisticated type of EMF that crippled them and allowed one of them to get T-Boned by a 'freighter' that probably had the equipment on it. No mention of that other than the usual relieving of the Skippers even though it wasn't their fault that they were given inferior equipment.

Maybe next you can do a video if what would happen if the USS Zumwalt were to fight a Russian fishing trawler!

What if: some nuke the water not targeting the ship and a huge wave of water crosses by?

Now they just need to figure out how they are gonna get ammo to the 6 inch guns on the Zumwalt lol.

It looks like it belongs in space

This ship is like a barn or pyramid or maybe house that floats in the sea XD

Is it me, or do these ships look like the Civil War ironclads Monitor and Merrimack ?

Either way, whoeverwon it would still be one awesome battle!

Somethin' they aint' tellin' ya' those guns are not normal guns. They are Magnetic Guns.

Why is it that the U.S. takes too long to fire a missle on a warship, russia be throwing missles every second.

I just watched the last Star War movie, and nothing more appealing and technological might than this new ship. Very amazed and proud to be an American.

The information I get in these videos is automatically discredited when I’m told by a robot.

Zumwalt is so Nerfed it would have a hard time engaging any surface combatant. Maybe in a few years when they actually make ammunition for the guns

Don't forget that it broke down again in July 2018 just trying to get to Boston. It needs a new motor that cost 20 million. I guess it's one of those the pumps liquid around the ship to keep it upright. Also it still hasn't joined any fleet action. It just keeps selling from the east coast to the west coast and back again.

What do those super cool 155mm guns fire as ammo since they can't afford the LRLAP? Grapeshot? Chainshot?

On 10 April 2014, the USS Donald Cook entered the waters of the Black Sea and on 12 April a Russian Su-24 tactical bomber flew over the vessel triggering an incident that, according to several media reports, completely demoralized its crew, so much so that the Pentagon issued a protest [1]. The USS Donald Cook (DDG-75) is a 4th generation guided missile destroyer whose key weapons are Tomahawk cruise missiles with a range of up to 2,500 kilometers, and capable of carrying nuclear explosives. This ship carries 56 Tomahawk missiles in standard mode, and 96 missiles in attack mode. The US destroyer is equipped with the most recent Aegis Combat System. It is an integrated naval weapons systems which can link together the missile defense systems of all vessels embedded within the same network, so as to ensure the detection, tracking and destruction of hundreds of targets at the same time. In addition, the USS Donald Cook is equipped with 4 large radars, whose power is comparable to that of several stations. For protection, it carries more than fifty anti-aircraft missiles of various types. Meanwhile, the Russian Su-24 that buzzed the USS Donald Cook carried neither bombs nor missiles but only a basket mounted under the fuselage, which, according to the Russian newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta [2], contained a Russian electronic warfare device called Khibiny. As the Russian jet approached the US vessel, the electronic device disabled all radars, control circuits, systems, information transmission, etc. on board the US destroyer. In other words, the all-powerful Aegis system, now hooked up - or about to be - with the defense systems installed on NATO’s most modern ships was shut down, as turning off the TV set with the remote control. The Russian Su-24 then simulated a missile attack against the USS Donald Cook, which was left literally deaf and blind. As if carrying out a training exercise, the Russian aircraft - unarmed - repeated the same maneuver 12 times before flying away. After that, the 4th generation destroyer immediately set sail towards a port in Romania. Since that incident, which the Atlanticist media have carefully covered up despite the widespread reactions sparked among defense industry experts, no US ship has ever approached Russian territorial waters again. According to some specialized media, 27 sailors from the USS Donald Cook requested to be relieved from active service. Vladimir Balybine - director of the research center on electronic warfare and the evaluation of so-called "visibility reduction" techniques attached to the Russian Air Force Academy - made the following comment: "The more a radio-electronic system is complex, the easier it is to disable it through the use of electronic warfare."

Already not looking so good being the bow got put on upside down.

Back door needs oil