Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, iOS or Android: con.onelink.me/kZW6/4jquhrlc

@muhammadhuzaifaazam

2 ай бұрын

I'll play and download this just to support you guys. Well done!!

@orionstarstudio6977

2 ай бұрын

Love the Game

@edmationz

2 ай бұрын

Currently playing the Game right now

@micksmith-vt5yi

2 ай бұрын

Lol you forgot these destroyers and US carriers use a Australian invention called Nulka as defense, it is a hovering decoy rocket and battle proven against Houthis in Red sea since 2016 when USS Mason first used it and has been last few months also.

@sunilnagoji

2 ай бұрын

not know nothing about no * OMG बट హౌ

A suggestion a 3:46. Please use accurate 24 km representation, instead of a world map and a ship in the Atlantic. This would give the impression that the ship could stike London by just being in the middle of the Atlantic. Your videos are amazing and having more accuracy would only improve them

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Noted our New Animator got a little excited with the exacteration

@jimmaynard

2 ай бұрын

@@Aitellythanks for the explanation

@user-zi7gd9pn3l

2 ай бұрын

​@@Aitelly lmao, I would too.

@thaixp5495

2 ай бұрын

@@Aitelly Lol I was thinking how in the world does that canon reach both side of the ocean

@Talven81

2 ай бұрын

Ha came here to say the same.

That 24km radius ... 🤣 Great video !

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Apologies our new Animator got a little bit excited on this project

@ktwei

2 ай бұрын

Small World

@tinker511

2 ай бұрын

I was soo confused i was like wtf, why do missels exist😂

@TampaDave

2 ай бұрын

⁠@@tinker511Actually I checked, and "missels" DON'T exist. If they ever DO, please make an entry in wikipedia.

@nothinginparticular1879

Ай бұрын

Why would you throw your animator under the bus that hard? You need better management skills

3:43 Bro, why did you draw 14 miles as the entire Atlantic Ocean? 🤣

@michaelpielorz9283

27 күн бұрын

we are impressed by yourknowledge, you surely must be an american professor!

The bridge is merely where they steer the ship and tell it where to go. The CIC (combat information center) is more the command and control center of the ship. It's where all the sensors feed into and where all the ship's weapon system can be control.

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Noted

@davidsyes5970

2 ай бұрын

There's also Aft Steering and there are multiple radar rooms which might have tie-in to navigation radar for collision avoidance in extreme cases. Tbis would be in addition to the radar rooms neing configured as local conteol stations for laying or directing ordnance onto targets. The Bridge is just the traditional command location when not in combat conditions. If the bridge is damaged, and if CIC is also damaged, then, CCS (Central Control Station) can take over. The ship has numerous cameras for various reasons, so, some can be used if personnel must remain inside the skin of the ship. However, if you're super interested in "failures to communicate", look up the NTSB and other sources for a roughly 80-page report that specifically breaks down the failure modes and other issues regarding the collisions of the USS JOHN S. MCCAIN and the USS FITZGERALD when in a few months apart they separately collided with tankers which given the heft/girth/mass/speed could have outright sunk those ships if hit in the right location. Sadly, given design choices and politics (don't let the DDG-51 dare compete with or threaten the new and beloved or "darling" Aegis Program cruisers, per some corners) from decades ago, sleeping below the waterline and being hit by a bulbous bow and overhang anchor of a merchant, however rare, can prove exceedingly deadly when the lookous, radar, beacons, and GPS all fail all at once.

@samiel992

Ай бұрын

Was going to state this then saw this comment bravo

There are no diesel generators on an Arleigh Burke class DDG, they have three Rolls Royce gas turbine generators, the first 28 ships of the class have 90 Mk-41 cells, the rest have 96. For the 5" gun, there's nothing automated about moving the shells and powder casings from the racks where they are stowed to the vertical hoist (that's done by about 4 or 5 Sailors). There are no "reverse" gears on them either, but they use variable pitch propellers, so instead of having to stop and spin the propellers backwards, you just change the angle of the blades on it to make the ship move in reverse.

@user-ui1kv8lo5l

2 ай бұрын

On the Hoel, DDG-13 we had 4 steam powered main generators and 2 emergency diesel generators (One forward, one aft). Burke's don't have emergency diesel generators?

@dundonrl

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ui1kv8lo5l Nope, just three gas turbine generators. Normally just run on two of them. They use a helicopter gas turbine to start the generator main gas turbine and that helicopter gas turbine (starter) engine uses two 12 volt batteries to start it.

@user-ui1kv8lo5l

2 ай бұрын

@@dundonrl Interesting. I like having two separate systems separated in the ship. I the main spaces were hit, and that's always likely - then the forward and aft generators will at least provide emergency power for coms and the like.

@dundonrl

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ui1kv8lo5l The generators are separated into separate engine rooms and auxiliary machinery rooms, they aren't all in the same location.

@davidsyes5970

Ай бұрын

@user-ui1kv8lo5l That's assuming the shock of a collision, a bomb blast, or grounding doesn't knock the gens off the line. I'd heard/read that the bombing of the Cole was so severe blast (the boat-bomb masquerading as a port serviced or harbor aide) it shock-wrecked the GTGS Nr 1 (below CIC and Nr 2 (MER 2) and the crew ended up using firehoses and a bucket brigade to get fuel (drawn from tanks probably 2 or more compartments forward of the Nr 3 GTGS?) some decks below the Hangar Bay into the aft gast turbine generator (GTG Nr 3) fuel feed line. Firehouse are not meant for fuel transfer, so, IIUC, the hoses contaminated thenfuel, and the strainers couldn't keep up. I served on the Flint (AE-32) (1/85-3/86) and on the John A. Moore (FFG-19) (~10/86-4/88), and it was not fun when the diesels dropped the load and it took 3-15 minutes to restore power and reload all surface and air contacts (whether by hand or backup data cartridges). Unless hit with a shipwrecker missile, most combatants should not lose ALL power simultaneously nor spend 20 minutes restoring it. But, it seems gennies are sensitve to shock more than advertised, I suppose.

For those who are wondering about the MK.45 Naval Gun General Characteristics Primary Function: Fully-automatic, naval gun mount. Date Deployed: 1971 (Mark 45 Mod 0) Range: 13 nautical miles (14.9 statute miles) with conventional ammunition. Type Fire: 16-20 rounds per minute automatic, conventional ammunition. Magazine Capacity: 600 rounds conventional for Destroyers; 1200 rounds conventional for Cruisers. Caliber: 5 inch 54 caliber (MK 54 Mod 1/2) barrel length of 270 inches (54 x 5) Guidance System: MK 45 Gun Mount is remotely fired from the MK 160 Gun Computer System or MK 86 Gun Fire Control System during normal operations Platforms: MK 45 MOD 1 (5"/54) - CGs 61, 65-68 (2 gun mounts per ship). MK 45 MOD 2 (5"/54) - DDGs 51-80 5" 54 (1 gun mount per ship); CGs 69-73 (2 gun mounts per ship). MK 45 MOD 4 (5"/62) - DDG 81-113AF (1 gun mount per ship); CG 52-60, 62-64 (2 gun mounts per ship).

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for your feedback

@ChristopherGriffin-ee2ol

2 ай бұрын

@@Aitelly You're welcome

This is the most detailed 3D graphic of US Navy destroyers I've seen on KZread. Thank you everybody for putting in the hard work 🤟☘️♥️

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

You are Awesome 😎. Only some people understands 3D animation and modeling. Thanks again 👍🏻😁

24 km, from Gijón Spain to New York USA, not bad range, Greetingss from Gijón Spain.

@JohnSteffani

2 ай бұрын

Nice to hear from you all in Spain, long live freedom let it ring,God Bless . VTY jake U.S.A.

This is the most detailed 3D graphic of US Navy destroyers on KZread. Thank you for putting hard work.

the 24km issue got mentioned enough Just a little heads up, these are fine animations and I really enjoy looking at them. So uhm, thanks 😍

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for the info! 😌

@FunkyMunkey00_

3 күн бұрын

someone actually aware

Who remembered the series The Last Ship. Remember the confrontation between Nathan James and the British sub

@micksmith-vt5yi

2 ай бұрын

lol i had to laugh when they used Australia invention Nulka in season 4. it does not give off the a picture like that when used. Yes it does confuse a missile to think it is the ship in a radar signature bigger then the ship but not like that.

Impressive, most impressive. My favorite How it works video was that of the submarine in which you used the Virginia class block V intended version to accommodate additional tomahawk missiles. As previously stated though a single silo could accommodate 7 tomahawks I would nonetheless reserve one of the silos for a Trident ll D5 14 warhead ballistic missile as a backup to the Trident and future Columbia DC boomers. Spreading strategic forces making them difficult to target.

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Ok thanks for your feedback. Will keep that in mind.

Major error on the MK 45 Gun section. No USN ships have an "automated ammunition shuttle" The rounds are hand loaded into the lower hoist from bulk storage (or straight into the loader drum if the magazine is on the same deck such as the rear gun on the Ticonderoga's). The RN, RAN and RCN will have such a system when their type 26 (or derivatives) come on line but this seems a waste of weight,ones and maintenance to me as an former operator maintainer of the MK 45

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for your feedback and your Service 👍🏻

@davidh4374

2 ай бұрын

What do you do now? What learning resources would you recommend for learning more about MK 45 from the operator's perspective?

I appreciate the dedication and professionalism of the US Navy.

10:47 Love how you explained the difference

Thanks for sharing this on KZread.

What a huge 24 km hahaha... From Istanbul Turkiye to the Titanic shipwreck in the middle of the Atlantic ocean. :D Greetings from Türkiye. Thanks for this beautiful video.

9:05 That rudder explanation 🤣 Thank you captain 😁

*@**3:44**, LOL! Thats one HELLUVA gun!!*

Excellent summary and discription, thanks.

As part of the RD team that manufactured the high speed reduction gearing for DDG 51. Working in the GEAR plant in Lynn MASS for GE. I ran the largest 7 axis cnc horz boring mill especially installed for the project. Myself and another machinist machined the prototype high speed reduction gearing required for testing. I wish more was talked about because in 87 after they went into production I resigned. I completely left the machinist trade fora better life and did

Love it, thank you for first class content!!

3:45 that's not 24 kilometres, it's more like several thousand kilometres

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Our Animator Got a A little too Excited. Apologies for the Graphics

@user-op8fg3ny3j

2 ай бұрын

@@Aitelly I was like, wow that ship can hit any continent 🤣

@nothernstar2576

2 ай бұрын

also, Germany is missing from the map

@danielchen1178

2 ай бұрын

I was mistaken the earth for little prince's home, asteroid B612

Man this is great

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks Miller 😌

Another inaccuracy, most Arleigh Burke class destroyers don’t have SeaRAM launchers. As far as i can tell, only 4 ships have them. The rest just have the CIWS guns. Another thing, those 3 dishes you have rotating in the animation…they don’t do that. Those are for locking onto targets. They will turn towards a target, and “paint” it for a missile.

As mentioned elsewhere, the DDG-51s do not have diesels. Reportedly, the Australian Air Warfare Destroyer, the UK Daring, and the Spanish licensed Aegis Frigate have diesels. Note that the USN has 3 Allison family of generators bought out by Rolls Royce/Rolls-Royce, but only two are operational at any given time. One provides power, and a 2nd is on hot standby or for load balancing, and other reasons (I wasn't an EM, EN, FN, GSE, GSM, or other; I was a Radioman aboard an FFG-7 (FRG-19) ship which does (it still exists, in the Turkish Navy, Gediz, Hull 497) have 2 GE LM2500s and IIRC 2 diesel generators, on forward and one near the Main Engine Room, which I did visit once or twice. I had access to many spaces while working towards my ESWS Pin, but also separate from that had eventually been in almost every space aboard that ship, even in the space between the LM2500 uptakes, the air intake housing when our 2 engines were replaced, the Mk 13 missile space, one of the two diesel rooms, supply, and the VCHT spaces, as well as the COs, the XOs cabins, and some of those of the officers. I didn't go into the Engineers Enlisted Berthing as they were fiercely territorial more than Ops and Deck. The political design choices foisted onto the Navy if it wanted funding for the Burkes was the 51s had to be AT LEAST 50 feet shorter than the Ticos/Spruances. (The Ticos, due to mass/displacement picked up a wet foredeck/foc'sle, so bulwarks had ro be added, increasing the ship's length by about 4 feet over that of the parent hull, the Spruance Class . So, ~503 feet the Flight 1 became. That forced the removal of one of the two watertight compartment separation between the 2 main engine rooms, shortened the ship, made her a wide, fuel-guzzling hog, and forced the Navy to ask GE to up the per-engine SHP so the 51s would be able to keep up with the Bird Farms. Such political imposing prevented the Navy from being able to in the future make use of the Northrop Grumman AHDS, which was conceived of in the mid 1970, to be what the Navy around 2016 or so tried to implement to desperately reign in the DDG-51 fuel consumption. The 51 could fit only ONE, not the envisaged 2 to 4 units. So, without a real redundancy due to sheer lack of space without cutting or removing something, it was probably pointless to proceed. So, no AHDS for th others of the class in any flight up to 2A. One GTG is forward of the fwd engine room, one is in MER 2, and one is aft in the Generator Room. When two run, one is off, in standby, or undergoing maintenance. For bus loading/frequency/voltage/transmission line capabilities/myriad reasons, you'll probably never have all three running at once. This seems to be physica, as IIUC, the online genny counts limit applies to other navies as well depending on the gennies chosen, power capability, redundancy, switchboard, and control systems, and much much more. Sadly, when one of the two Burke destroyers that made contact with merchants off Japan (or, this may actually be related to the COLE), the jolt was so hard that the ship lost all power for several minutes across the two running gens. IIUC, the loss of power killed the ability to pump fuel to aft where the one working genny was physically operable. So, a bucket brigade or a hose brigade was needed. Fire hoses are not rated for fuel transfer, so... This is not first-hand information. It's either in the NTSB reports or elsewhere in trade/industry papers. Happy Hunting (for info)!

I love these animations of how things work and happen, keep up the great work!!

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks! new video on the Aircraft Carrier coming soon.

Thank you for this amazing video

beautiful explanation of warship...i love your video bro...keep doing.❤

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks 👍🏻 will keep on producing more videos

You forgot SM-2 and ESSM. So Aegis Burke destroyers has 4 layers of air defense. SM-6 -> SM-2 -> ESSM -> CIWS either Phalanx or SeaRAM. If it carries SM-3 it has another layer of air defense against ballistic missiles. Also Mk41 VLS is not a hot launch system only but a housing for either hot or cold launch missile canisters. Lastly, Harpoon follows a sea-skimming trajectory not a parabolic path. And only Flight I/II use Harpoon.

@micksmith-vt5yi

2 ай бұрын

Lol you forgot Nulka a Australian invention as a defense system. USS Mason uses it against Houthis and funny some stories say the missile mysteriously falls in to the sea as a malfunction.

Its impressive how battleships evolved from behemoths full of cannons to high tech streamlined missile carrriers.

@drksideofthewal

2 ай бұрын

It really is. A fight between modern warships is less of a slugging match, and more of a “wizards duel.”

@user-ui1kv8lo5l

2 ай бұрын

Battleships didn't evolve like that. Battleships were decommissioned. Often turned into Museums.

I love Arleigh Burke Destroyers and amazing video ❤❤❤

The guidance section IS the autopilot. The section behind it is the warhead. The booster is not the sustainer Mach 3.5 is a speed, not a range

i love how great you portray the ship, 900 school bus's!! and even a mighty ship such as this, is a drop in the ocean compared to some of the WW2 era superheavy battleships, most of which no longer exist

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Yes Agreed 👍🏻

3:47 had no idea the Atlantic was so small 😅

Combat decisions occurs in CIC (Combat Information Center) and not the bridge, that's where they drive the ship from... this ship fights from CIC.

Amigo, Forecastle is not pronounced four castle, it's pronounced foke sel.

@mapex1976

Ай бұрын

And Frigate is pronounced frig-it not frig at! 🤣

@horationelson1840

Ай бұрын

It is pronounced that way today, yes. However at one time it was indeed pronounced how it’s spelt. Over time it was shortened to the pronunciation we know today.

@mapex1976

Ай бұрын

@@horationelson1840 Well today is today!

Good Animation.Thank You Very Much.

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Always Welcome 🙏🏻🙂

Good vid, but be aware the vid mispronounces both "Phalanx" and "Frigate"..... also, noted the range map at 03:46 is badly out of scale, the indicated range being more appropriate for a ballistic missile than a fleet defense missile.

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Noted the Animator got a little bit excited

AWESOME VIDEO MAN!

The most detailed animation of a US aleigh-burke class destroyer.

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

You are Awesome 👍🏻😎

24 kilometer radius, seems the world is a village indeed

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Apologies our new Animator got a little bit excited on this project

@elijahtucker7938

2 ай бұрын

@@Aitelly You keep saying "new animator". Do you not fact check stuff?

SPG-62 radars don't spin around like that. They are not search radars, they are target illumination radars (kind of the exact opposite). On Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, the role of the search radar falls on four SPY-1 (or SPY-6 in case of Flight III ships) solid state electronically steered phased array S-band radars placed around vessel's superstructure giving the ship 360 degree real time radar cover with each SPY-1 array capable of tracking and engaging 100 targets in real time (based on official unclassified information. The true number is almost certainly at least twice that and most likely still much higher), with SPY-6 array reported being 30 times more sensitive (note that this doesn't necessarily mean capable of engaging more targets). Being S-band radars gives them excellent range but insufficient resolution to accurately guide semi-active radar-guided missiles (such as SM-2 and ESSM Block 1) in their terminal phase (last few seconds before impacting the target) which requires X-band. This is where SPG-62 radars come into play. When SM-2 or ESSM Block 1 enter their terminal phase, SPG-62 antenna will illuminate their target with a narrow X-band beam giving the missiles highest possible radar resolution. Once target has been destroyed, the SPG-62 antenna may point to another target, but will most certainly not be spinning like a search radar. This is why there are three of them on each Burke and four on each Tico-cruiser. Good job with the animation and 3d modeling by the way.

Beautiful

Good video, greetings from Colombia.

You guys are getting quite good views on this btw. Nicely done

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks 👍🏻😊 We love you guys. Even better videos coming in 2 weeks

During WWI and WWII, Destroyer only purpose are "Protect Cruiser and Battleship from Submarine and Air Attack" Modern Destroyer is a "Battleship" that didn't need huge caliber naval gun.

@croskerk

2 ай бұрын

That cab also act as escorts and fleet protection. US Destroyers do be jack of all trades

Wow, our artillery range has expanded a lot...and the Atlantic shrunk. 3:44

@Talven81

2 ай бұрын

Good job now I can't stop. Let's delve in, sounded like let's tell them. Sus-tainer, mak 3.5, fuh-laynks... Please learn to pronounce these things.

always great animation !!

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Great

Great video! Being a Destroyer Sailor myself, your depictions are very good. Not fully accurate, but I rather not tell you the corrections because I want my Shipmates to remain safer out to sea. The bad guys are watching and learning, we like to stay a lot of steps ahead.

@haroldbalzer5916

2 ай бұрын

Lol right I seen the interior depictions and thought well that's completely wrong.

Amazing

The CIWS fires before the rolling airframe missiles?

3:45 lol that exaggerated 24km radius 😮

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Apologies from the Animator

3:40 This was so out of scale that Germany left the chat

Bow and stem are not necessarily interchangeable. Stem refers to the very front of the vessel whereas bow is more the general area. The part you animated as forecastle should’ve been the bow. Also there’s really no forecastle on a destroyer

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for your feedback

Informative and entertaining 😅

I am biggest fan of this channel . I watch it all the time .Don't stop. We are waiting new videos I am watching from uzbekistan 🫡🇺🇿

4:25 they are mixing up speed for Range The Range is the distance that the missile can travel Also when they are illustrated the range of the cannon of 14 km they draw a map to show it can reach to both Europe and the USA if it were in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I never knew that the Atlantic Ocean was just 28 km wide as this video illustrated

Hey dude. Great work . Nice animations. How do you produce these animations so quickly. I want to teach some students using animations but it seems long and time consuming

Both Virgina and the destroyer has active and passive Sonar systems as far as I know. The submarine prephere to use pasive systems more often but both have them.

the ship we are interviewing was a Arleigh Burke class

Hi bro...1st comment..❤

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Awesome bro

Next kirov class ship sir!!

Someone in the Chinese navy is like...."ahhhh intelesting" *writes notes*

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

😬

@davidsyes5970

2 ай бұрын

Not from KZread videos. They'd likelier hack the defense contractors, infiltrate NAVSEA, socially engineer susceptible employees of them, or just endlessly visit on open house days and glean publicly visit-safe spaces.

Navy guys, a question: Do you collect the expended brass from the 5 inch or just kick it over the side? Reasoning: with the 105mm tanks we used to reprocess the brass for future tank rounds.

@kingdedede1066

2 ай бұрын

Push it over the side

@curtisophillipsjr378

2 ай бұрын

We made ash trays out of them in my day. 1977-82

@schlirf

2 ай бұрын

@@curtisophillipsjr378 Same with the Tankers.

@jamieklettke5061

2 ай бұрын

@curtisophillipsjr378 we still do today as well. The problem is the hardened metal is really hard on the lathe

@m1yuuu_combatseawolf

2 ай бұрын

​@@curtisophillipsjr378same here even today we have two empty 5in brass as ashtrays in our smoke deck

I like your videos very much. I watch your videos from Bangladesh

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thank you so much 😀

So much state of the art technology, but the Arleigh Burke is such an old looking 80’s design. Why can’t the navy build cool modern looking ships????

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

It's not working the newer ship.

@knight6

2 ай бұрын

New ship designs are costly, whereas ships that are still around can be upgraded. There is also a lengthy process in designing, testing, and acquiring new ships.

Do Virgin Galactic spaceship systems next

There are no diesel engines on a Burke class Destroyer. How did you miss that, they have been at sea since 1990.

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

It's for the battery not for for the propeller

@davidsyes5970

2 ай бұрын

There are no diesel generators aboard the DDG-51 class ships - PERIOD. Installation of diesels certainly was contemplated, but the Navy kept as much of the Speuance and Ticonderoga as possible and crammed it all into the fat, short, sticky, fuel-guzzling "revolutionary hull form" hull. If you try casually, tou could say the 51 is kind of like a giant PT-109, scaled up. If into conspiracy theories, drift into the territory of " Gee, I wonder how much GE lobbied the Navy and Senators to ditch diesel..." Loll... Only recently did Rolls-Royce gain some traction, since ~ 1978. There never have been. Any batteries aboardship ( in the Ticos and Burkes) will be what we called UPSES, as in UPS plural, as in uninterruptible power supply. Those are racks, probably close to IT room 1RU, bit on on steroids fir MilSpec, weight, and fire reasons. Those batteries don't propel the ship. They supply the absolutely core vital control and data transfer systems when the ship loses all three of the Gas Turbine Generator Sets (GTGs or GTGS's.) They keep targeting data in RAM. (On my first ship, the Flint (AE-32), steam-propelled, we'd sometimes lose ALL our diesel power. It took over 15-30 minutes to manually regenerate target tracks data. IIRC the FFG-19 was faster, at mabye 5-8 minutes regenerating target data when we fully "dropped the load".) Those batteries (51, 47, 963, 993 classes) are/were periodically topped up or reconditioned vai a mix of conditioning gear, switchboards, transformers, and more, fed by gas turbine engines dedicated as power sources, since the initial Burkes, and, IIUC, even Flight 3 don't derive electrical power from the propulsion engines (that last bit I need to re-research). IIUC, they use Rolls Royce MT-30s for electrical power. Again, I may be wrong about that bit. The AWD has diesels, it seems, but they are small, pretty much the size format or form factor British use. That's a legacy of the UK during WW2 having tiny railroad tunnels via which it shipped diesels across great distance to the shipyards. They apparently kept that small footprint and like it. The USN has a propensity to sometimes act like Texas, in that bigger is better, more power density per device is better than smaller, more nomerous, distributed power generators. Some of it is design philosophy. Some of it is that industry can end up charging more just because if you build that into your design, it's hard to remove it without politicians (or their paid-off former officers-turned-consultants sometimes working against the Navy's real or political interests) meddling to serve their constituents who need/covet that money. Equipment needs, counts, and resiliency, and survivability will all determine the size or load capacity of a ship's gensets. Diesels are HEAVY, depending on how many megawatts you need, how MilSpec they need to be, and whether or not they're "life-of-ship" (meaning not expected to be removed by cutting or hacking the device or the ship to get it out or to replace it) components. But, who told you the DDG-51 has diesels? They pulled your leg, or legs, or you waded into disinformation or bad information. As for the source information about the British tunnels limiting the installed power per generator, you may be able to find the following: "A Comparative Study of US and UK Frigate Design" Larrie D. Ferriero, Department of the Navy, NAVSEA, Washington, DC, and Mark H. Stonehouse, Sea Systems Controllerate, UK Ministry of Defence, London Their paper was published in 1991, in SNAME Transactions, Vol. 99, 1991, pp. 147-175. That's 29 sheets, front and back, a trade industry journal allocated to that pair of writers who acted as mock designers of each other's navy to make for their own navy a ship concept approach borrowing concepts and rules from the other. It's a fascinating and extremely informative paper. Likewise, innumerable examples exist in the real world, and far too many examples exist for anyone undertaking a hobbyist naval ship presentation to double-down on things the industry or any real sea service sailor can readily (if inclined) correct, refute, or elucidate upon. If you're able to, you may want to raise funds to obtain a subscription to US Naval Institute Proceedings. It's not cheap. It's available internationally. I've been reading the publication since ~1975, when I was only 10, and I had my own subscription by age~17, before I joined the USN. If you live in or near a maritime city you might convince your librarian to obtan a subscription to put on the shelf. Or, visit a nearby shipyard. If you can visit Japan, and if this is still open (I visited it inn2005, adter visiting a Mitsubishi office in Tokyo), go to Funenokagakukan. If you can visit Busan, South Korea, to to the National Maritime Museum. It has a huge maritime display as well as a maritime library chock full of sruff about shipping and ship design. If you can get to Seoul, and then to Yongsan, visit the Korea War Memorial. You see there a 20-foot model of the King Sejong The Great. I saw those three facilities in 2012 and 2016. You won't be disappointed. I visited each of those four attractions at least 4 or 5 times. Lamentably, I in 2012 didn't get beyond Shanghai to the museum as it seemed too far from where I was living. I should have true harder, since I was in Shanghai for more than 14 days. To my surprise, as my ferry departed Quingdao to return to Korea, I realized my hotel was right next to a major submarine base. Over 20 diesel attack subs were there. I don't know if I'm embarrassed or lucky that I didn't know, since I was in Quingdao 1.5 days before going to Shanghai, and ~3 days before leaving back to Korea. Oh well. Something I at age 14 (1979) did that torqued my would-be recruiter (a submariner, aka "bubblehead") is that I drew on one of my fictional teardrop-shaped subs, a 7-bladed propeller. This was a huge jump over my comical props they'd (other recruiting duty sailors in the office) seen but said nothing of. He was livid. He demanded to know how I came up with that. He bellowed that that was "Top Secret US Navy Information!!" He was was fuming. When he calmed down, I told him I saw it (the concept) on the cover of Seapower or USNIP magazine that arrived in my subscription (note: 1978/1979), in a picture of a Japanese diesel boat, in a drydock. Its prop was shrouded, but, I clearly could discern there were 7 blades but counting the hidden blade protrusions and estimated what was in the gaps on the lower side. Then, when my mom's boyfriend tossed away a Coors beer can, I cut it open, made a series of props with blade counts of 1-9, shaped them based on kit models (twist and skew), punched center holes, put them on my Bic ball point pen, and gently and forcibly blew down onto each one several times. I still have those blades today. The 7-bladed one knicked my face, almost cutting my eye. I ecstatically screamed to myself "THAT'S GONNA BE MY PROPELLER", then finished drawing my sub's control room, messing, reactor, torpedo room, generator room, and more based on recruiting pamphlets and any information about the Thresher, Scorpion, Nautilus, Tulline, Permit, and more that was sitting in the public library. Then, after school, haunted the recruiting office as Indid 1 or 2x a week, and saw my stunned recruiter flip out and reveal more than he should have. But, neither he nor the Navy ever took my drawings. Nor did anyone in my chain of command of either of my two ships, nor at any of my shore duty stations while in various schools twice at San Diego. I'm not an engineer, but I read and read a LOT. I only consume publicly available info, meaning I don't pay or sicial engineer or hack my way into information people want kept private. There's so much info "out there floating in the air", as in the movie "Heat", when De Niro asked a hacker/thief how he obtained the wiring diagram of a bank vault. "That sh*& is out there... It just floats in the air..." (Of course, on unsecured routers and antennas...) The Navy is generous. If you're in the US or not in a banned region, or not behind a dodgy/shady network connection, and aren't playing stupid games to win stupid prizes, you can get alllll ssssorts of free, educational, public, sanitized, "unlimited distribution authorized" facts, concepts, and more. Information from sources is your friend. Just use unclassified, unrestricted, trade industry or Navy- or university- released, or manufacturer-provided brochures or marketing material.

The first layer of defence is the radar, not the missiles. The scale applied to the ship in relation to the Atlantic was 😂

@johnstudd4245

2 ай бұрын

Radar is not going to stop anything.

Please review the Frigate and Cruiser as well.

Can you please make one like this for aircraft carriers too like the Nimitz Class of Gerald Ford? I really wanna see how does those giants work

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Yes coming in March.

@AyeAye-nq9om

2 ай бұрын

Tor air defense missile animation 😘😘😘

@spongememefunnypants9101

2 ай бұрын

@@Aitelly Thank you!

Good video, but I have a minor nitpick. You confuse weight and displacement. (Many people do…) Your video states that the Arleigh Burke class weighs around 9500 tons. In fact, that’s the ship’s displacement. If memory serves, the vessel’s dead weight is closer to 3000 tons. Excellent animation. Hope to see more.

@brianb-p6586

Ай бұрын

The actual displacement is the gross weight; the weight of water displaced by the hull of the ship equals the weight of the ship, which is how buoyancy works. That's gross weight (the standard term in loaded displacement), meaning the ship and its contents.. so perhaps you think "weight" should only mean the bare hull, or the ship in sailing condition (with engines, for instance) but with no other equipment installed? 3,000 tons sounds plausible before fitting with everything that makes it a destroyer... what may be called Light Displacement or LDT. The video is describing a functioning destroyer, not an empty cargo ship.

This is almost really good...with just a bit of editi

I've seen this channel before. It was called Animagraffs and it was much, much better.

SeaRAM would be used before CIWS, as it has longer range. Edit: I am not sure if this is still the case. with VLS, the flight profile used to fly straight up to 100,000 ft, then towards target, picking up radar guidance only in the final phase. This was the most efficient profile? giving much better range than early Std, which flew toward target with radar all the way? what this would have meant was it is not good for missiles already close, hence Sea RAM?

@johnstudd4245

2 ай бұрын

I think the sea ram fills the niche in coverage between the long range modernized standard and the relatively short ranged phalanx. Makes me think of the coverage layer of WW2. The 5 inchers with the proximity fuse, then the the 40mm bofors for moderate and close range, and the the 20mm for last ditch close range.

Wow I Love this youtube than any channel. Best Wishes from India 🇮🇳 Karnataka ❤

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

I love Bangalore one of my friends is from that state. I had a great time down there

Pronunciation on Phalanx, Frigate. Searam is a longer range defense system than the phalanx, not what you imply. Previoustly stated your range circles for the Mark 45 gun is pretty bad.

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Yes agreed 👍🏻

No diesel generators. I've built the intakes for the generators on about 20 DDG's built at Ingalls Shipbuilding in Pascagoula Mississippi.

The haversack, as the name suggests, is used to carry grenades.

That’s a bit over kill for one ship but I guess that’s what makes the deterrence

Would be interesting to know the Chinese version of the Burke class. Made in china? Yes. But instead of imagining how the different ships would go down in a 1v1 and their specs, let's wait if you can make a new 3D animation about that. Also your animations are as cool as thay are informative, keep up the good work!!

Too bad you didn't cover the various Electronic countermeasures or decoys such a ship can carry. It also carries a variable depth towed array sonar for submarine detection. Even lasers are being added for deception purposes. The Burke class is a hell of a ship.

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Will do it our next video. Thanks 👍🏻

Hauthi 😂👑 Real Super power ❤😂

Brother need different between destroyer vs frigate vs cruiser ships with deeply

I have interesting suggestions. Can you make a video about anti ground weapon and anti air weapon and anti ship weapon. And also include what happen if like example use anti air weapon to attempt to destroy ship

@muhammadhuzaifaazam

2 ай бұрын

This is a great idea. I have a suggestion for @AiTelly to include JF17 Block III in this video idea. It'd be a great addition

Nice animation, however the fire control radar spinning around was a bit goofy

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Noted thanks for your feedback

at the front is the bow. That is the most important poin because otherwise ANY ship will face severe problems!!

Where is Cic?

Bit slower please, take it easy, quality over quantity ok? Make a few high quality and accurate videos instead of ramping up lots of videos at short periods

@DavidVerbout

2 ай бұрын

Why slower? You cannot keep up? The video is already six minutes longer than necessary

@terminallydrunk1900

2 ай бұрын

Should of stayed in school dood

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Noted 🙂

@ducoh2093

2 ай бұрын

dont bother it was a great video only the 24 km was a bit messy but it was very appreciated still!@@Aitelly

@siddharthshekhar909

2 ай бұрын

​@@Aitellythe frequency and the quality of the videos is excellent. I enjoyed it. Don't bother with such complaints. Please make a video about a submarine hunter and long range maritime surveillance aircraft like the Poseidon P8.

Actually, it's four Corvettes Frigates Destroyers Cruisers

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for your feedback 👍🏻

There are more capabilities than what is covered, but it's classified. OPSEC!!

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Yes 👍🏻 I heard about the laser and the upgraded Sonar

@micksmith-vt5yi

2 ай бұрын

Australian Nulka invention also is on all Arleigh Burke destroyers and Air craft carriers. USS Mason has used it against Houthis since 2016

3:42 What's that red circle? That's not 24km 🤣

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

It's just abstract version of the Animator

3:40 the biggest “not to scale” I’ve ever seen

Forecastle is pronounced "foxkull" source: Navy vet

@johnstudd4245

2 ай бұрын

Maybe better put as "foex-sull" with foe pronounced as the letter O as in freind or "foe". That's what you meant I'm sure, but some one will read that as fox - kull

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Thanks will keep that in mind We love learning new stuff everyday from the comments section

Certainly don't let accuracy get in the way...

5:25 Literally _no one_ who's ever worked on a Mk15 calls it 'fuh-lunks.' It's 'Fae-lanx' ... Because it's a magical fairy that will @#$* you at 0300 on a Sunday. 😉

@Aitelly

2 ай бұрын

Same to you 🃏

What Software did. you sie for the Models. They Look Great and i want to learn how to do them too.

This DESTROYER you talking about is a set of pixels from this very game. 😁😁😁