Who Would Win: The $4 Billion Zumwalt Destroyer or a Russian Battlecruiser?
Who Would Win: The $4 Billion Zumwalt Destroyer or a Russian Battlecruiser?
The recent decline in relations between Russia and the West has reintroduced ship-to-ship warfare. The US Navy is reinvesting in its primary mission of destroying ships after more than a decade of supporting land wars in the Middle East and Central Asia. The U.S. Navy is expanding this capability but at the same time introducing a new class of ship, the guided-missile destroyer USS Zumwalt, designed primarily to support land warfare. Meanwhile in Russia, Moscow is still trying to squeeze life out of its Kirov-class battlecruisers. The gigantic surface ships, all nearly thirty years old, have aging but still generally effective armament, and are still capable of carrying out their primary mission: attacking very large enemy ships, especially aircraft carriers.
Пікірлер: 152
Next video: Freedom class vs guy with inflatable boat and water gun.
The Nakhimov has Zirkon. The Zumwalt has cannons. 😂😂😂
@kyru8326
2 жыл бұрын
It doesn't have ammo bcs the ammo is so expensive us can't afford it
@user-iu2sf6xh5d
2 жыл бұрын
The uss zumwalt has and mislle nooobbb
@jemsloveseliza
2 жыл бұрын
It's pyotr not nakhimov and since when did Russia have a hyper Sonic missile on a cold war crap?
@kylecarter8436
2 жыл бұрын
Not anymore. They are removing the guns to install missiles
@c0ldyloxproductions324
2 жыл бұрын
@@jemsloveseliza since they have been modernizing the ship for 10 years now
Next, please do "Who Would Win: The $362 Million Freedom class Littoral Combat Ship or a Russian Battlecruiser?"
@yayaconde5746
2 жыл бұрын
¹
@jemsloveseliza
2 жыл бұрын
Bro
Zumwalt program closed. 3 ships built. and under-armed. and it's big for a destroyer. looks like a cruiser.
The Zumwalt doesn’t even have ammo for the guns, but once the guns are removed and replaced with CHGB hypersonic missiles it would be an easy win for the Zumwalt.
@marshalljulie3676
2 жыл бұрын
Hypersonic missiles that hasn't been fully developed and tested yet 😂
@drksideofthewal
2 жыл бұрын
@@marshalljulie3676 Yeah, your point? I didn’t say the refit would be happening this year, are you trying to imply the hypersonic weapons will “never” be ready?
@williamwest9204
Жыл бұрын
@@drksideofthewal russia already has them, the zum would be a 4bil corral reef
@drksideofthewal
Жыл бұрын
@@williamwest9204 False. Despite the hype (pun intended) Russia has not demonstrated a viable hypersonic ASM. China has, the DF-17, but their missile relies on a complex, easily disrupted killchain. Given the Russian navy's pathetic performance against Ukraine, a country with no navy, they are the least of the US navy's concerns.
@williamwest9204
Жыл бұрын
@@drksideofthewal well it was reported one was used against ukraine but nobody could confirm after the fact. The russian navy has more active ships then the us does currently, most of which have as much tested combat experience as the zumwalt, which is none. And the Ukrainians have performed so well for multiple reasons, most of which is WE are fronting the bill and giving them the supplies
The Zumwalt honestly would take out the Battlecruiser with a few shots of its naval gun.
@kevinhaywood1268
2 жыл бұрын
With what ammo? There is none for them
@soji-yeunmochi-con1162
2 жыл бұрын
Ammo where?
If zumwalt has the larsm theres no chance for anyone to win a battle against zumwalt they tomahalk sea variant that out range the enemy.
❤ 💯💯💯❤ Rao shakeel Ahmad karachi Pakistan ❤💯💯💯❤ i like you 💋 my fevret russian warship ❤💯💯💯❤ love you ❤
All litoral combat vessels where deemed not combat effective due to the low level of arms
@nunya3163
2 жыл бұрын
And the severe cracking issues. Literally falling apart after 2 years.
I love America! My country is not perfect, but we do many good deeds that goes unnoticed....... it's ok. I still Love My country m
The Zumwalt is actually a middle destroyer now. They are removing the cannons that are too expensive to fire anyways…
@nightlightabcd
2 жыл бұрын
Are you sure you are not referring to the original electric cannons it was originally built to have, but they would cost a million dollars a shot, so they armed the Zumwalt with these. I think these are going to be replaced with missile cartridges!
Russian battle ship will sink by itself, lol
@coop3014
2 жыл бұрын
Hahaha 😝
Considering a Ukrainian home grown missile destroyed Russia's top flagship Cruiser, the answer seems obvious
@haqqizillysozo
2 жыл бұрын
Those Ukraine scenario using drone and already know where the ship location. While the video stated it was OTH battle without both knowing the exact location.
@marshalljulie3676
2 жыл бұрын
This is not the same ship hater😒. Kirov could send helicopters in the direction of the last hilo location they detected so it all depends on how they use the tools available to them.
you can't fight something you can't see !
Hoffen wir das es keiner rausfinden will. Eines steht fest .Beide sind auf den Kampf optimiert .Beide werden dann zusammen untergehen. . Denn der größte Fehler ist dabei den anderen zu Unterschätzen und sich selber zu überschätzen. Denn jeder Krämer lobt nur seine Ware !!
Oh boy let me think….hmm….I’ll take the boat with the hypersonic missiles. Pretty easy.
@williamvelazquez2059
2 жыл бұрын
Tell me you don’t know nothing about hypersonic whitout telling me you don’t know nothing about it
@Bushwhacker-mb3uh
2 жыл бұрын
@@williamvelazquez2059 Why do you think NATO took out the Moscow? It was loaded with hypersonic missiles the mach 6-10 variety and nuclear tipped cruise missiles. If you believe that the AZOV Nazis did that on their own, nuff said.
@drksideofthewal
2 жыл бұрын
Do you know the difference between supersonic and hypersonic?
@Bushwhacker-mb3uh
2 жыл бұрын
@@drksideofthewal nope not a clue, I just live to fool people everyday of my life. Could you please teach me?
@drksideofthewal
2 жыл бұрын
@@Bushwhacker-mb3uh Google is the best teacher
The Russian cruiser has an S-300F long-range air defense system, so the American helicopter will never know what killed it. And anti-ship missiles are not guided by radar, but simply launched towards the target. Missiles themselves find enemy ships based on their shape. Therefore, "stealth" will not help.
@deneshkandiah2194
2 жыл бұрын
But in real life the s300 failed to save the moskva? Stealth pretty clearly works
@Anti_Everything
2 жыл бұрын
@@deneshkandiah2194 S-300 most likely was not activated. In addition, with radar detection, only the size and speed of the target, and not mythical stealth, play a role.
The fact that the zumwalts aren’t equipped with ship to ship battle abilities is really a let down! Granted it’s stealth is neat The armament equally matters and they haven’t got much to offer if They were ever confronted at sea
I love from India
@pawansrihari6727
2 жыл бұрын
Thaliva
Please do a video comparison with Ballistic Missile Nuclear war heads of USA, Russia and North Korea 👌
Zumwalt is better
0:40 that's the royal navy
The winner is ("2x bayraktar tb2" 2x$5mill. with "2x4 NAM-L" 8x$500tsd.)
At this point...as Russian Frigates carry real life hypersonic weapons and there will be NO american equivalents for YEARS its a moot point. however, Zumwalt was never built to fight anything. This is just a works project for the MIC...
There are a LOT OF "IFs" and for sure the US SHIP doesn't navigate alone : she has information from satelites, radar airplanes, helicopters ,...! In real life, this is not a joke !
Kirov Class is Cruiser which Exist 1 - Active , 1 - Under Refit or Modification Zummwalt Class is Destroyer a Failed Project 3 Unarmed Vessels Exist , Rest All Vessels Cancelled | DDG X - Lider Class , future projects
Who would win? .. probably who ever sees the other guy first! 👁️... that stealth ship looks like a suped up Dreadnought I think the Russian wsrship looks cooler!..thanks🇳🇿
I guess soon we will know who is going to win.
El que primero dispare gana
Kirov defensive systems won’t be working either. Ask the Moskva.
No Difference Whoever carries the best weapons
Neither, in the real world, both would break down before reaching the battle.
@definitelyfrank9341
Жыл бұрын
Actually in the real world, there would be a 66.66% chance that the Zumwalt ship doesn't even have the "advanced" 155mm rounds, since two of the three ships built, weren't provided with any. Honestly, the Russian ship would definitely win. Just look, it has torpedoes (If I remember correctly) it has anti-ship missiles, and it has naval guns with ammo.
La russie n'est pas de taille avec les USA et l'OTAN
lol so many tankie trolls
Wasn't the Zumwalt not successfully attacked by a Japanese container vessel two or three year ago
@monkeyking-self-proclaimed7050
2 жыл бұрын
No, those were arleigh burke class destroyers by Philippines cargo ship
me decidí por el barco ruso porque ese barco americano vino con muchos problemas incluso a veces se queda y hay que remolcarlo
@overtime...
2 жыл бұрын
mala eleción!!! los buques rusos se hunden solos ... si no crees eso pregúntale a los mismos rusos (del Kremlin) por el Moskva!!!
Prob russian battleship....has 5x more missles
Russian boat will sink itself of fear
@idk-oj5do
2 жыл бұрын
wake up kido 😂
@ramjetsplace2235
2 жыл бұрын
@@idk-oj5do it just did :-D Russia is completely useless
,,How about the US destroyer Arleigh Burke.?
Zumwalt would win because it has helicopters with tomahawk missiles available for use too. Unlike the typical Russian warship. So it's not even close 💪🇺🇲
@DinkyDoughnut
2 жыл бұрын
NO! Any Russian FLoating VesseL able to accommodate and Launch the Hypersonic MissiLes can sink Any Opposition VesseL, simply because nothing in the West has a Radar Defence System that can counter or intercept the Hypersonic PLatform.
@cadewells9652
2 жыл бұрын
@@DinkyDoughnut *incoming Ukrainian missle*
@DinkyDoughnut
2 жыл бұрын
@@cadewells9652 WatchOut, Aircrafts heading straight for the WorLd Trade Towers.🤓
@cadewells9652
2 жыл бұрын
@@DinkyDoughnut but there's only 1 now. I can't even tell if this is an argument or just an awkward interaction
@christianlloydamar8167
2 жыл бұрын
@@DinkyDoughnut I heard something flag ship sinking on black sea by the 80s missile🤣🤣🤣
The Zumwalt doesn't have Harpoons ????
RUSSIA WOULD WIN 🇷🇺 !!!!!
Com mísseis hipersônicos Kinzhal as coisas ficam diferente em todos os sentidos em uma guerra
@overtime...
2 жыл бұрын
Since Ukraine none ship fears russian´s because they sink themselves (don't believe? ... ask for Moskva)!!!
russian with zircon or bastion.
The Russian are effective like the moskaw lol 😂 come on
@haqqizillysozo
2 жыл бұрын
Moskva crew combat awareness drop cause it's 50 days without enemy threat. Maybe they also focused on engaging the Ukraine Bayraktar
Se estiver a funcionar com o( mosca ) nao vale a pena perguntar
my answer:😂😂😂😂 the rusky destroyer has not chance against Zumwalt destroyer
Ganaría el ruso por mucho
For the Kirov, she won't even need to use her Granits missiles, just stir up some huge waves around the Zumwalt and the Zumwalt will tilt and topple over, just as simple as that. And for the Zumwalt, she only need to wait for a fire to break out within the kirov or for a Ukraine Neptune missile to strike her and she will be at the bottom of the sea in no time.
@xopcxopc2250
2 жыл бұрын
👍🤣
The Zumwalt the Best Destroyer in Design in the World and Stealth while Russian Destroyer one of the Obsolete in Design not Comparable especially Zummwalt Class Arleigh Burke Class Ticonderoga Class Cruiser ...
The Russian warship of course. Their ships travel the speed of light and with billion miles range........Everything Russia have travel at light speed and billion miles range for that matter!!!
EEUU. SIN NINGUNA DUDA.
Ya se hundio jajaja el siguiente vs
Rusia
Well this was a waste of 6 mins
These russian big destroyers are useless in battles, look what we did to the brother fragship 😈😩😡👍
Ukraine will win even Russia win cannot occupy or control.
Not worth 92 cents
+1Life
Not the best analysis....
Russia have the upper ✋. They fires Hypersonic missile and no way to counter it while Zumwalt fires Supersonic missile that can be defeated.
Все! Нет москвы, 2 ракеты понадобилось, от страны без флота
@user-cp1vp5bq7j
2 жыл бұрын
Какие ракеты, он подорвался на морской мине после чего сдетонировал внутренний огромный боекомплект, а тихоходных ракет он сбил бы без усилий
Granit missile has its own radar system. It can also throw decoys and use electronic warfare to decrease chance of interception by enemy AA systems. Zumwalt has low radio signature only in frontal projection, so in real battle most likely Kirov would decisively win.
I will put my bet on zumwalt,it's stealthy design gives it an upper hand over that old hag Russian ship,zumwalt is armed with missiles not only cannon😛😛@faker213.
Since Ukraine, none ship fears russian´s because they sink themselves (don't believe? ... ask for Moskva)!!!
,,That Russian battle cruiser is not battle proven,the Ukrainian home made Neptune cruise missiles sank their Moskva.
Who cares???
Russia has its hands full with Ukraine .
Bolsonaro 2022
El americano es solo pantalla en combate ganaría el barco de guerra ruso
Moskov is superior, gets sunked by 2 Ukraine missiles from land... 100% hit raito, so much for that air defence..
@haqqizillysozo
2 жыл бұрын
You're wrong about 2 things. 1. Ukraine already know where the Moskva location from bayraktar surveillance. Thus it's easier to engage the ship compared to the video scenario while both in high alert and neither both of them knowing one another location. 2. Ukrainian missile causing moderate damage, because only carrying 150kg warhead. the ship wasn't sunk immediately, but it's massive antiship with liquid fuel and 500kg conventional or 1000kg HE semi armor piercing warhead might be the reason.
@kalle1689
2 жыл бұрын
@@haqqizillysozo lol i wasnt wrong about anything. It was the 2 Ukraine missiles who damage the ships so badly it sinked. If bombs on the ship exploded it was due to the Ukraine missiles.
@haqqizillysozo
2 жыл бұрын
@@kalle1689 if it's damaging so badly, the ship will be immediately drowned. It's simply don't have air defense against cruise missile, just ak630 which considered as AA gun. S300 wasn't meant to stop cruise missile..
@kalle1689
2 жыл бұрын
@@haqqizillysozo why? It might as well take several hours. Titanic took several hour for example.
Winner is ukrainian rocket Neptun)))
Another stupid KZread video...stupid in that "one-on-one" ship battles ended in World War Two and even then they were rare. But just for fun...you'd have to factor in crew skills and after the sinking of the Moskva you have to wonder about the Russian crew skills, but then the Americans are more of a danger to themselves (and cargo ship). Of course the Zumwalt would probably have to launch whatever it was going to launch from dockside...but then as long as the Russian stays away from Ukrainian shore...so yeah, this is pretty stupid...but if the Russians had Batman and Spiderman and the Americans had Superman and the Incredible Hulk...I'd have to give it to the Americans...but if the Russians had Gandalf and Aragon and the Americans had Harry Potter and Hermoine....it goes to the Russians.
Hey some body ask putin if he thought the ukraines were going to let his war ships keep distroying his country 🤔
Stealth 😂😂😂 hardly sad American NATO overpriced tin can
Ничего мощнее Кузнецова в мире нет.
@augusto8821
2 жыл бұрын
🤣🥳
@BT-qs7id
2 жыл бұрын
🥴 🇷🇺
@augusto8821
2 жыл бұрын
@@BT-qs7id ist der Russenpott genauso so gut wie die Moskwa? 🤣
Russia win.uraaaa....
Rusia tiene un ejercito descoordinado e ineficiente, con tecnología incapaz... Cualquier arma de occidente sería superior
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺