Pre WW2 ships: each class of ships have different tonnage and roles in the battlefield Ships now: *Ship is ship*

@fupoflapo2386

2 жыл бұрын

They have all the same weapons almost but with different quantities.

@popokiobake

2 жыл бұрын

Nope, a ship is scrap - after a anti-ship missile hits it, no matter how big it was.

@ashenshield1712

2 жыл бұрын

I ship it

@epicmetod

2 жыл бұрын

Cold War: F-111 do intercept, A-7 do bombing, F-4 do fights Modern: F-22/Su-35 pls *do everything*

@quinndenver4075

2 жыл бұрын

@@epicmetod a better example for the U.S would be the f15 or f35, the f22 is an almost purely air superiority aircraft whereas the f15E and f35 are truly multi role. I’m not sure about the russian side of things.

“Shortly after the torpedo destroyers started carrying torpedoes” you either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain

@leithcrowther6086

2 жыл бұрын

You were supposed to DESTROY the torpedo boats, not join them - bring balance to the fleet, not leave it in darkness.

@zemildlybird2024

2 жыл бұрын

@@leithcrowther6086 Destroyer: i HATE YOU

@sassolino8767

2 жыл бұрын

@@zemildlybird2024 Carrier: "it's over destroyer, i have the sky ground"

@jayyllaann289

2 жыл бұрын

@@zemildlybird2024 Battleships/Carriers: You were my protector. I loved you.

@raycearcher5794

2 жыл бұрын

Torpedo boat: "Look what I found in your room! Where did you learn this?" Destroyer: "From you, dad! I learned it from you!"

There's really only three categories. 1. Pointy floaty thing. 2. Flat floaty thing. 3. Rounded sinky thing.

@adarsh4764

Жыл бұрын

Yup, that's the thing!

@rooblez9005

Жыл бұрын

Lol😂💗

@tankythemagnorite9855

Жыл бұрын

Jolly good. I get it.

@mthimbanenamanje210

Жыл бұрын

Look at me. You are the Captain now. 😑

@kirillzakharov7336

Жыл бұрын

indeed. 3, take it or leave it.

The iPod, iPad, and iPhone was a really good analogy!

So essentially: Cruisers took the role of Battleships Destroyers took the role of Cruisers Frigates took the role of Destroyers Corvettes took the role of PT Boats Carriers are still carriers Amphibious Assault ships are still Amphibious Assault ships but with air power Submarines are still submarines And the Battleships got fired

@AethenTheProotTheSecond

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

@suhandatanker

2 жыл бұрын

Best analogy for the navy ever period.

@alamrasyidi4097

Жыл бұрын

so sad that rocket powered armaments are replacing cannons...

@itsmesky3545

Жыл бұрын

@@alamrasyidi4097 Yeah big guns are cool. Missiles aren't cool.

@padnomnidprenon9672

Жыл бұрын

@@itsmesky3545 missiles are cool, but when used in conjunction with direct fire canons or railgun. Otherwise they just bloat the battlefield and lose their awesomeness

Battleship then : giant and powerful piece of art, beautiful ruler of the ocean Battleship now : low poly unity assets

@ArkofGold

2 жыл бұрын

also battleship:time to have a vacation for a little bit 100 year

@justokay4548

2 жыл бұрын

Lol you guys have some awesome comments

@user-oi2rn6qh2k

2 жыл бұрын

Kirov-class battlecruiser: -You sound funny (Yes i know that it is battlecruiser but not battleship but Kirov-class battlecruiser longer than Bismark)

@Nihil1265

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-oi2rn6qh2k laugh in richelieu

@user-oi2rn6qh2k

2 жыл бұрын

@@Nihil1265 richelieu was using in WW2, but Kirov-Class still using now(Pyotr Velikiy and Admiral Nakhimov)

Let’s not forget that some cruisers , particularly in the Russian navy, have the incredible ability to transform in submarines! Outstanding

@romanberkutov2592

Жыл бұрын

О это прям как американские УДК! А лоториалы могут превращаться в металлолом, если за это сначала заплатил конгресс, чтобы их построить, а потом еще заплатил чтобы разобрать спустя 3 года! Вау)

@azzidopintea4953

Жыл бұрын

Hahahahaaa

@mynameiskian

Жыл бұрын

​@@romanberkutov2592 YEA

@unknownmf2599

Жыл бұрын

@@romanberkutov2592 lmao ruski is mad

@romanberkutov2592

Жыл бұрын

@@unknownmf2599 это вы намекаете о подводных роботах-торпедах мощностью по пять мегатонн?

My last year of high school my shop teacher had his brother, who worked for Lockheed Martin, do a class presentation for us. Although, the presentation was supposed to be about how he was hand building a canoe in his recent retirement and the wood working skills he used, it turned to his line of work prior. he had a part in the development of littoral combat ships and he told us how when they launched the first one and it took off it's wake washed all the civilian boats out of the way. Honestly a fascinating and fun story.

@sebastienleblanc2708

10 сағат бұрын

Fibre glass and rawhide...

"You will finally know how to differentiate between these classes of warships" "Or will you" *VSauce intensifies*

@souptikhait4862

3 жыл бұрын

*VSAUNCE*

@gruzza9000

3 жыл бұрын

Hahaha he questions just how u can differenciate , not just what u can differenciate

@Jacob_frye

2 жыл бұрын

BIG BRAIN MOMENT

@spotisadog8509

2 жыл бұрын

Dude as I read this he said it holy mr coincidence shit pile

Learned more about warships in a short video than I did in 7 years in the Navy.

@amirazraei

2 жыл бұрын

cool

@shawnryan2197

2 жыл бұрын

What was your job in the Navy?

@slowturtle6745

2 жыл бұрын

@@shawnryan2197 Avation maintenance so really a different navy than the actual sailors. That was long ago and far away. "I went to sea to see the world and what did I see? I saw the sea."

@steezy_4s

2 жыл бұрын

@@Not.TravisScott just say thank you for your service

@ashmitdahal6849

2 жыл бұрын

because of guys like you pearl harbor was bombed

It's crazy how ships were just built bigger until torpedoes were invented, then a tiny little boat with a couple of guys and a torpedo could end a campaign, so smaller boats needed to be engineered

@karlik4861

8 ай бұрын

they were not

@augustday9483

5 ай бұрын

I think it comes down to the progression of weaponry. For a while, canons were the main offensive tool for ship combat. Bigger guns could shoot farther and do more damage, so bigger ships were better because they could hold more and bigger guns. Then torpedos and aircraft carriers were invented. Aircraft had significantly longer range than a battleship's main guns, so battleships became inferior to carriers. Fundementally it's about range. Rock -> club -> spear -> bow -> gun -> canon -> missile.

that moskwa picture isnt up to date. its slightly more subnautical now

Destroyers have become the very thing they swore to destroy

@porsche-sandoesnotundersta8184

3 жыл бұрын

I see what you did there

@charlesmaddison212

3 жыл бұрын

Ironic

@kafkaesk3449

3 жыл бұрын

Did you ever heard of the tragedy of darth torpedo boat the wise?

@porsche-sandoesnotundersta8184

3 жыл бұрын

@@kafkaesk3449 Enlighten me.

@auxencefromont1989

3 жыл бұрын

@@porsche-sandoesnotundersta8184 thats not a story the battleships would tell you

So there are very three types of ships: 1)anti submarine ships 2) "everything else" ships 3)submarines Got It.

2 жыл бұрын

Didn't we come with this knowledge?.. :)

@The_UPD.

2 жыл бұрын

2.5 ships that go what the shit when they see a enemy jet

@Suddhadeep

2 жыл бұрын

umm... Aircraft carriers?

@The_UPD.

2 жыл бұрын

@@Suddhadeep Technically all ships do that

@Suddhadeep

2 жыл бұрын

@@The_UPD. No Aircraft carriers are supposed to carry more than Helis and VTOLS. They are supposed to carry large arsenals of aircrafts and have limited mobility.

3:45 you can say goodbye to that ship

3:45 Look at that beautiful russian cruiser! It would be a shame if a couple of R-360 Neptun ASBM transformed it into a submarine...

@mynameiskian

Жыл бұрын

hehe

@iamgroot4080

Ай бұрын

Kursk all the way baby!

The most underrated ship of the strike group is the supply ship. Mystery meat from Monday with rice and spaghetti noodles gets old after 70 days out to sea. 🤣

@MentaIcare

2 жыл бұрын

Taco Tuesdays and burgers Wednesdays!

@EndoClaw

2 жыл бұрын

Mystery meat… well then even the navy likes humans quite a bit.

@johanrunfeldt7174

2 жыл бұрын

Seems autobiographical, are you a sailor?

@earnestbrown6524

2 жыл бұрын

@@MentaIcare We had a great cook that after burger Wednesday we would have Cheese Burger Soup Thursday. It was really good.

@matthewcoveney4380

2 жыл бұрын

You're welcome! From MSC

"Oh no, a man has fallen into the river in LEGO City!" U.S Navy: *Get my aircraft carrier, It's time for a search and rescue mission*

@wongcayven9893

3 жыл бұрын

Search and *destroy*

@towltowl906

3 жыл бұрын

@@wongcayven9893 search and *enslave*

@user-wf9sl9or2o

3 жыл бұрын

long live CHINA

@NationalDefenceAnalysis

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-wf9sl9or2o long live Taiwan

@RonaldTrumpOfficial

2 жыл бұрын

@@NationalDefenceAnalysis long live *TEA*

It's interesting how a lot of classes converged on destroyer-sized vessels with largely similar capabilities. It could be that in the future any classification other destroyers, subs and carriers is obsolete.

@hoarder1919

11 ай бұрын

it might be largely obsolete, but not completely obsolete. You need to pass a certain size to be able to conduct deep sea operations. So something like a torpedo boat or small corvette would still never be considered a destroyer even if powerfully armed - simply because a torpedo boat or small corvette would have a hard time against the ocean.

@blakedavis2447

11 ай бұрын

Still need something to carry the marines

@kitemporal

6 ай бұрын

And amphibious assault.

I’m so glad I found this channel! Definitely enjoyed your video! Looking forward to going to your video archives now!

@NotWhatYouThink

2 жыл бұрын

Welcome aboard!

2:37 Cruiser would be "Cruising the world" . * shows a sinking antique cruiser *

@erwinhilgers5574

2 жыл бұрын

He never said they did it well

@ProfessionalTrenchDigger

2 жыл бұрын

It's not what u think

@rootintutin2576

2 жыл бұрын

Flying dutchman

@gojitsar7505

2 жыл бұрын

They’re doing their best, okay.

@Gentleman...Driver

2 жыл бұрын

They became their name because they could "cross" the winds, tho.

"No more audience questions during the video. Thats what the comments section is for." Lol

@Carhill

3 жыл бұрын

Serious 4th wall breaking there. 🤣

@mkvv5687

3 жыл бұрын

@MorTobXD "Fourth wall" is originally from theater. It's when an actor "breaks" their role, turns to the audience, and does something. It can be a comment, a joke, or just a glance. The idea is that normally actors play their "3 walls" on stage (or behind the camera) and do not acknowledge that there is an audience (the fourth wall).

@AceCmbatguy25

3 жыл бұрын

1000th like i feel powerful

@johnpatz8395

3 жыл бұрын

@@jagoringjagoring9143 i haven’t played that in at least a year, but I loved that game and will have to try it out tomorrow and see what’s changed since I played it last. Thanks for the reminder.

@smipth

3 жыл бұрын

Clittoral

There are tow AS ships, submarine tender, are in Guam as home port. They have civilians and Navey personnell on board. Many years ago there was Destroyer Tenders and Repair ships, basically a floating repair facility for ships, but congress cut all but the two sub tenders.

As a Marine, I’m sure having that instantaneous artillery support from battleships would have been nice. Dropping 16 inch naval shells might not be effective against air, but it’s definitely effective against infantry or armor. The Navy also has to support us marines and our amphibious assault.

@AngelA-mk5ty

2 жыл бұрын

I mean its hard to calculate artillery strikes and not hit your people trying to compensate for the curvature and rotation of the earth. And then battleships doing that plus compensating for sway just sounds anxiety inducing for whom ever made the calculations back in the days pretty much they would just eyeball in the oldschool times and be like shoot anything with trees.

@guyman1570

2 жыл бұрын

@@AngelA-mk5ty Jason... we have what is called ship gun fire-control systems. They used to be mechanical calculators that you use dials to operate with. Nowadays it's electronics, but the concept has been fully well-known for a long, long time before you were even born.

@mediumtim2237

2 жыл бұрын

I'll be honest,decently fast firing,high caliber high explosive shells sounds better then an expensive missile that could be used for other targets farther in-land

@Dracomandriuthus

2 жыл бұрын

Its mostly cost that prohibits battleships from being used- That and flexibility. Battleships are intended as water superiority ships, but Aircraft carriers are superior at that. I understand the desire for battleship artillery, but using aircraft for close support is usually going to be more effective, from both a cost and accuracy standpoint.

@Captianmex1C0

2 жыл бұрын

I never thought about that but I'm sure knowing there was a moving city covered in guns watching over you and your buddies would have been a reassuring thought.

The American Navy has the second largest Air Force in the world. Just in case you didn't realize how many planes participate in Modern Naval Combat

@thomasbummer4361

2 жыл бұрын

thats not true but it ranks in the top10 still, when we talk about capability surely rank 3 or in some years 4

@BRla86

2 жыл бұрын

The American navy has more airplanes than the American Air force.

@thomasbummer4361

2 жыл бұрын

@@BRla86 nope

@koharaisevo3666

2 жыл бұрын

@@BRla86 The largest air force in the world is the United States Air Force.

@stephenwilliams1730

2 жыл бұрын

@@BRla86 you are right the navy does have more aircraft and better pilots.

**torpedo boat destroyers being outfitted with torpedoes** "you become the very thing you swore to destroy"

@sameerthakur720

3 жыл бұрын

Anakin, you were supposed to destroy the torpedo boats, not join them

@andrewgates8158

3 жыл бұрын

Think about low radar cross section fast torpedo boats in modern warfare.

@mr_enigmatic

3 жыл бұрын

@zero g: underrated comment

@spicytaco3209

3 жыл бұрын

Stolen

@ShadowReaper-pu2hx

2 жыл бұрын

A naval monopoly.

Man I know this is an old video but thank you for covering this. I was really into curious about what exactly the difference is. And was curious about the concept of formations and thought it'd be good to start with ships cause it's pretty easily distinguishable. I hope youve made these about other types of land stuff?

I'm hooked I love these videos, they for real separate alot of the Hollywood set ups in my head to the real details portrayed in your content

@NotWhatYouThink

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks Jesse!

@jessespring120

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you again your information and content is more solid than cnn or fox

One correction I have to make: Aircraft carriers traditionally used to have diesel engines. This, however, does not mean they would run on diesel fuel. In fact, the diesel engine is named after the Diesel cycle, as invented by Rudolf Diesel, and the fuel after the engine. Diesel engines can run on a variety of different fuels. Most marine diesel engines use heavy fuel oil, which is way cheaper than diesel.

@Fabben1

2 жыл бұрын

Most civilian ships run on HFO, since it it cheaper, and the technology have been around since the late 1960s for the diesel cycle engines. Military tends to have different priorities, like usability, stability and inter-usage between ship types. The HFO (or FFO-Furnace Fuel Oil) was used during the switch over period from coal to oil, and used for steam boilers. Ships equipped with diesel engines and gasturbines were (and are) using a diesel fuel oil, in shipping also known as a MGO (Marine Gas-oil). The standard for this is Nato Fuel F76. So he is correct by saying that the ships are using diesel fuel.

@nikoweindel1198

2 жыл бұрын

@@Fabben1 Are you saying military ships with diesel engines and gas turbines or military ships with diesel engines and/or gas turbines use this fuel?

@averylividmoose3599

2 жыл бұрын

that is actually fascinating

@BBb-xv9cm

2 жыл бұрын

@Niko Weindel @Niklas Fabritius, Thank you both; very informative!

@77LCJ

2 жыл бұрын

@@Fabben1 Yes, our ships ships run on diesel or some so close to it, that you would be able to put in your car.

Reviving Battleships using rail guns as their main armament.

@rakisuzuki-burke4148

3 жыл бұрын

If railguns become feasible, battleships will come back very quickly. The defenses on most warships are there to prevent them from getting hit, and it is /really/ hard to stop a shell from landing. Also, tungsten darts are likely /much/ cheaper than cruise missiles.

@highground7923

3 жыл бұрын

Also, smart ammo (basically tracking bullets) are starting to be used on guns, they act the same as missiles but at a somewhat shorter range, cheaper, and can’t be countered currently. These both combined could result in battleship or monitor type vessels reoccurring

@kennethferland5579

3 жыл бұрын

If rail guns were to become practical it wouldn't bring back the Battleship unless you also end up with massive armor protection on the ship as well and this is unlikely due to the importance of speed. Historically ships with high caliber guns but without armor were called Battle Cruisers (though the term was lose) In reality your likely to just see such a single such weapon integrated onto modern cruisers replacing the existing deck gun and it would be arguable if this would even rise to the level of a new class, particularly if it becomes part of the existing weapon mix on the cruiser rather then something the whole ship is built around.

@luftwaffles274

3 жыл бұрын

@@kennethferland5579 probably would just be a cruiser with a railgun instead of deck gun and the rest of the ship has storage for replacement parts and battery storage for the insane amounts of energy required to shoot it, i would imagine this type to be accompanied by a fleet close to what a carrier battlegroup would have in terms of protection and/or some dedicated supply ship with a nuclear reactor to supply the ship with the power to generate and charge the batteries

@501ststormtrooper9

3 жыл бұрын

@Nabil Asyraf *Happier Hood Noises*

Modern surface combatant classifications are almost entirely arbitrary. The Arleigh Burke class destroyer has the same displacement as the Ticonderoga class cruiser, and the Zumwalt class destroyer is so massive that it rivals the tonnage of smaller battleships. The days of destroyers being small escort ships are long over. They're now the main surface combatants of most modern navies.

@jonmce1

Жыл бұрын

Quite true, some reporting for the Canadian Type 26 frigate at full load will be 9400 tons about the same as the Burkes and Muscova. For Canada it will be more a general purpose ship with a proposed sensor array nearly as good or even better than some of the supposed larger types.

This is a very good video. Thank you for your hard work, research, and final product. Informative content!

The jobs of boats Destroyers: I am a guard Cruises: I am a commander Battleship: I am the general Aircraft carrier: I AM YOUR LORD

@kuhaku9587

3 жыл бұрын

The Submarine is the spy.

@gbornitz

3 жыл бұрын

@@kuhaku9587 Nah, the Ohio-class is more like a doomsday-ninja

@cordedtundra3556

3 жыл бұрын

Where's the frigate

@stylinsandwich

3 жыл бұрын

@@cordedtundra3556 behind you

@cordedtundra3556

3 жыл бұрын

@@stylinsandwich ಠ,_｣ಠ

Regarding submarines: "Regardless of their size, they are all referred to as boats." Ah, so they do turn inwards!

@NotWhatYouThink

3 жыл бұрын

😅

@fucky889

3 жыл бұрын

I didn't get it, can you explain

@TomDestry

3 жыл бұрын

@@fucky889 There's another video that tries to answer what is a boat and what is a ship. Take a look and it should make sense.

@fucky889

3 жыл бұрын

@@TomDestry thanks

@FIRE_STORMFOX-3692

3 жыл бұрын

@@NotWhatYouThink well you have some explaining to do and it better be not what I think XD

One of the cruisers you showed is currently operating a special mission at the bottom of the Azov sea.

@RoflcopterLamo

2 жыл бұрын

So… it sunk?

@akmitliviy

Жыл бұрын

@@RoflcopterLamo Yes, sir.

Brilliant Video. You get a full 100/100 from me for this. Explained practically everything.

I’m honestly sad Battleships were decommissioning. They look so amazingly bad ass with their big ass cannons.

@chiarosuburekeni9325

3 жыл бұрын

So because they LOOK good yet have been outdated since the early 40s you're sad? Thank God you're not in charge of your country's military budget

@warnpeace5294

3 жыл бұрын

@@chiarosuburekeni9325 LeTs SpEnD 22.5 BiLlIoN oN oNe BoAt. That fucking wasn’t worth the cost. Why can’t Battleships be upgraded, instead scrapped or retired as a museum of historic engineering. I understand that they were outdated but they can always be updated instead of left behind. I can guarantee you half the budget of the Zumwalt destroyer’s construction. Could upgrade 2 battleships to be just as capable for modern technology. That and older destroyers could be updated as well saving so much more money. Yes I get the Zumwalt has stealth features. But has it been tested in combat? That much money would make it too pricy for harsh testing.

@Jedssski

3 жыл бұрын

Maneuverability for them is slow. Too costly for their size. Destroyer only cost little but it could destroy a battleship twice the cost as that destroyer. They could be use for beach assault or something but those roles were replaced by warships with better capability (aircraft carrier, missile destroyers, amphibious Assault ship, missile submarines, etc) there really isn't any technology that could let you build a powerful battleships this days. If you're telling them to replace the main guns with missile, It would be an easy target due to its massive size. They can be torpedoed away by some submarines which would just waste all of the missiles in that battleship. Mostly these days, nations prefer a small yet powerful offensive force like destroyer, rather than a big battleship with great armor with powerful guns. Battleships are obsolete this days. The example is battleship Yamato which just got sunk by a bunch of torpedo bombers. If you want to build a powerful weapon it must be cost effective one.

@warnpeace5294

3 жыл бұрын

@@Jedssski Well battleships still pack a massive punch they could be redesigned to be naval mobile artillery because some nations have missile defense systems that can render certain missile destroyers useless

@Jedssski

3 жыл бұрын

@@warnpeace5294 they could be, but as I said they lack mobility... If there is a technology where the battleship could be faster.. yes it could useful. but as of now it isn't nowhere as useful as modern cruisers. The battleship could even be a thing of the past tho

Honestly. You have taken the algorithm, shat on it and it was like "mmmmmm, I like that" and gives you millions (of well deserved) views.

@beanaye5433

3 жыл бұрын

What the hell?

@wongcayven9893

3 жыл бұрын

Interesting description

Bro , i click this video not knowing what channel it from . But whenever i listen to his voice , i automatically remember the " it's not what you think " guy . Love your videos❤️❤️

Was in Philly Navy firefighting school just out of boot camp. My friend was stationed on the carrier JFK in Norfolk. He drove up and we went to see his ship. I was astounded at the size of it. Truly something to behold. A giant city unto itself.

I've become fascinated by the prospect of an enormous ship that can sustain a large population indefinitely.

@arengano561

2 жыл бұрын

Hydrophobia: Prophecy is set on a boat like that.

@firingallcylinders2949

2 жыл бұрын

From talking with dude's who have lived on a carrier it sucks over time. Living with the same 6k people gets old after awhile. My friend was with the Ike strike group and he said because of Covid last year they couldn't go into port....all they saw was water for months on end.

@nomekop777

2 жыл бұрын

@@firingallcylinders2949 I live in a town of 4k people. That doesn't sound too different

@DirtyStinky

2 жыл бұрын

@@firingallcylinders2949 Lmao they call it ikeatraz for a reason

@firingallcylinders2949

2 жыл бұрын

@@DirtyStinky hahaha I didn't know that but that's hilarious

Its kinda sad battleships are one of the coolest things you can see in a naval battle but now its getting more useless because of missiles and air superiority Edit2:The only 2 problem of railgun is the amount of power it cost to fire a round and the barrel can tear easily by shooting a round Edit:You can make an entire essay about battleships just by reading the comments

@justsomeguywithasurprisede4059

3 жыл бұрын

Sad that battleships are gone??? Simple! Make a MODERN BATTLESHIP

@Maverick8o8

3 жыл бұрын

if you want battleships back you have to replace the aa guns with tomahawk missiles and use the main guns for bombardment

@Arpatow

3 жыл бұрын

Kirov is probably the closest thing we got to a modern battleship

@ser43_OLDC

3 жыл бұрын

@@justsomeguywithasurprisede4059 A modern battleship. You have the most similar to that that is the kirov class

@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520

3 жыл бұрын

Talk the guys that were in desert storm , having BBs around was a bit of a moral thing as well even in modern warfare Was also pretty effective in deceiving the Iraqis that a massive amphibious operation was under way

Well done 👍🏾 🙏🏾Thanks for spending the time to create this content 🤙🏾

@NotWhatYouThink

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching, Zachary!

I genuinely love theses videos thanks

So what you're saying is that Frigates still have the 3.5mm headphone jack?

@NotWhatYouThink

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly 😁

@rickrick3790

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂 this is too funny

@modernwarships2747

2 жыл бұрын

@@NotWhatYouThink yes,but it's not what you think 😂 I love it

@kinglolmon6453

2 жыл бұрын

@@NotWhatYouThink hahaha 😂🤣😀

@fupoflapo2386

2 жыл бұрын

That is good

I like how there’s like 3 completely different ships that are mostly made to counter submarines.

@sjoperdje

2 жыл бұрын

I still dont completely understand all these different ships. It sounds like they can all be fitted with different armaments to combat either subs, sea, land or sky. So what makes them really different then…

@Nonamelol.

2 жыл бұрын

@@sjoperdje exactly.

@sevensicilies

2 жыл бұрын

Subs OP they need a nerf

@msmith5080

8 ай бұрын

@@sjoperdjetbh I think it’s more a size thing, as you can fit out a destroyer to be better at air defence or better at anti submarine warfare The classes are just the weight and even those are blurred, not much difference between a big frigate and a small destroyer

Battleships : *Why are we still here , just to become a giant target*

Great video 🙂 My cousin is a Sargent in the Cabadaian military, and it has given me an interest in the military. This was a great video. Its very educational.

13:00 He nailed the differentiation of cruiser, destroyer, frigate and corvettes with his example.

@Kaizoku_Zoro

3 жыл бұрын

he forgot patrol boats

@rodrigomarques1075

3 жыл бұрын

@@Kaizoku_Zoro well you see this video is about warSHIPS

@Kaizoku_Zoro

3 жыл бұрын

@@rodrigomarques1075 bruh they can also be called patrol vessels, ships, or craft.

@rodrigomarques1075

3 жыл бұрын

@@Kaizoku_Zoro i think there is a big diference between a frigate and a patrol boat one of them is that one is habitable

@Kaizoku_Zoro

3 жыл бұрын

@@rodrigomarques1075 just because a ship isn't habitable doesn't mean it's not a ship in fact people have lived on boats for a sea voyage.

Military: “Battleships are useless” Marines: “F you we need Battleships to bombard beaches so we don’t just die” Cruise missiles: “OI IM HERE TOO”

@UnknownUser-ni9iz

3 жыл бұрын

Navy - we can provide state of the art zumwalt's $1m shells🤑

@kazm4760

3 жыл бұрын

Thats what they did Except it was the soviets using conventional cruisers with 152mm guns for the Naval infranty

@MajorHavoc214

3 жыл бұрын

I would rather recieve close fire from a destroyer than a battleship. If you don't know the difference, you never served in the US Military during the eighties and ninties.

@russianbroskie2026

3 жыл бұрын

Imagine the point of the carrier

@Banana_Split_Cream_Buns

3 жыл бұрын

@@MajorHavoc214 yeah, battleships were great at firing on places like Iwo Jima.... before any marines landed... but even then they were powerful but the Japanese were just too dug in.

Very informative, thanks for putting this up.

For those interested, allot of nations classify their ships as different classes based on different metrics (Shock, I know). What this means is the U.S Zumwalt class Destroyer is named a Destroyer for its intended purpose, while many other Navies in the world would refer to it as a Battleship since it displaces more water than many past Battleships. Europe now uses allot of what they call Frigates, but the U.S would call Destroyers. They displace Frigate amounts of Water for European classification, but in a direct example, the French Stealth Frigates carry as many missiles (or more for the upcoming new frigate) as the largest U.S Destroyers. This is why the Frigate section of the video may sound a bit confusing or conflicting.

sadly, battleships just became large targets with no real long range attack systems.

@Bitchslapper316

2 жыл бұрын

They were still good ships, the main reason they stopped using them was the cost compared to effectiveness.

@johanrunfeldt7174

2 жыл бұрын

In post-conflict analysis after WW2, the Navy brass realized all they had used their Battleships for, was to support the Marines and Army landing on enemy shores. The real fighting at sea had been carried out (pun) by Aircraft Carriers.

@christophersalinas2722

2 жыл бұрын

@@Bitchslapper316 Yeah, that’s why..

@helicoptersauce

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah but keep in mind the iowa had missile countermeasures added in the refit in the 80's so, its still a massive target, but it can defend itself to an extent.

@WanderingYankee

2 жыл бұрын

@Lucas Mohler *Sad Cher noises*

13 mins Jesus thats gonna be fun

@domp5014

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed

@coughingpenguin4346

3 жыл бұрын

lol

@balkman_4

3 жыл бұрын

Such an underrated channel

@diegovildosola8295

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly!!! Ahaha

@jainandunsingsafio2209

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao

Excelent explanation and video. Well done. Congratulation.

The analogy at the End was great, thanks!

Rest of the world: > Torpedo Boat Destroyers Russians: > Эскадренный миноносец (Mine warfare linear combat ship)

1:04 Aircraft carriers 2:35 Cruisers 4:20 Destroyers 7:00 Frigates 8:30 Corvettes 10:30 Amphibious Assault Ships 11:01 Submarines

@thenortonanti

2 жыл бұрын

1:04 Aircraft carriers 2:35 Cruisers 4:20 Cruisers 7:00 Cruisers 8:30 Cruisers 10:30 Cruisers 11:01 Cruisers

@sirpineapple2262

Жыл бұрын

Bro the KZreadr literally has it timestamped this is completely useless

@BierBart12

Жыл бұрын

Man, I hoped amphibious assault ships would drive on land like a Bagger 3000 Or imagine it walking with giant spider legs like the Cybran walking ships

@charluu1929

10 ай бұрын

​@@thenortonantiI think subs should be referred as black fish or underwater boats

@EvenWinter

10 ай бұрын

@@sirpineapple2262 maybe it wasn't timestamped a YEAR AGO??

In the US Navy, cruisers are primarily an air defense vessel While in the Russian Navy their primary purpose is sinking

love the cruiser scene 😂 just drowning as you are talking about how were just cruising around. perfect b-roll

I remember hearing about a situation where as a ship was about to capsize, the ships captain ordered the entire crew to stand at the opposite side, turning it upright. That just goes to show how many people are in the ship, that them on their own can actually act as a counterweight to the ship itself

@gutslisteningtoasmr9801

3 жыл бұрын

That's honestly really fuckin funny

@comradehellfire2095

3 жыл бұрын

@@gutslisteningtoasmr9801 Ikr

@derrickubay-ubay9503

2 жыл бұрын

Sadly it failed.

@comradehellfire2095

2 жыл бұрын

@@derrickubay-ubay9503 No, it worked

@DeclanOReilly

2 жыл бұрын

Navy types call that a trim party when at sea, won't comment what they call a trim party ashore as this is a family type ..., a fuck it lol a girl in every port and a port in every girl

As a soldier (back in the day) I worked with the Navy quite a bit, but never bothered to ask the difference between a Cruiser and a Destroyer. Now I know, and knowing is half the battle (Go Joe!) Thank you for the content. I really enjoy your narration. You never fail to evoke a smile.

@NotWhatYouThink

3 жыл бұрын

Glad to hear that, Charlie! Finally, someone who likes my “robot” narrations (as some say 😅).

@DJ8017

Жыл бұрын

One thing I've never understood is why there isn't a dedicated missile ship, especially in carrier strike groups? I know Arleigh Burke destroyers have 90 SM-6 missiles each, but that isn't very much when sailing through contested waters like the South Chinese Sea. There is no limit to how many missiles that can be shot from land at our carrier group. Why isn't there a cargo ship like the HMM Algeciras outfitted with 100,000 Sm 6 missiles ready for defense?

As an ex airliner I just became interested in ships and this video is so good!

Imagine a battleship created with today's technology. They could have just one gun turret, but the accuracy would be insane. Could easily swat away smaller threats with modern missiles and point defense systems while just looking at something miles away and wiping it off the map. Battleships are so underappreciated man, hurts my soul

@constantinethecataphract5949

6 ай бұрын

One Railgun 3 gun turret and the rest of it's armaments are anti ship, anti air and torpedoes and maybe add drones of both air and sea variety.

The term 'cruiser' comes from the Dutch term 'kruiser' meaning 'crosser'. It was invented to bring the firepower of a battleship, but with much higher speeds to 'cross' enemy ships at sea, meaning to intercept them. About the frigates, there can be air defense frigates too. Most frigates have decent anti air capabilities. The littoral combat ships are discontinued. There are more categories. Logistic ships like tankers and tugs for example.

@bathshebahubber614

2 жыл бұрын

not to mention the different types of gunboats and landing craft that come in all shapes, purposes, and sizes

@melanoc3tusii205

2 жыл бұрын

So you're saying that "cruisers" are actually "interceptors"? Way better name.

@LordWiggle

2 жыл бұрын

@@melanoc3tusii205 yes, well, even better specified: battlegroup / carrier group interceptors :) Nowadays they are obsolete, sadly. They look epic!

@LordWiggle

2 жыл бұрын

@Bob Shingles no, they are named that way because they are cruising long distances. They go relatively slow (compared to short range missiles) but have an enormous range. As in: more then 500km. They are (mostly) GPS guided, as it is impossible to have a target on radar, support the weapon with uplink, or have the risk of the weapon going for the wrong target (as you are blind on that range). They don't have to be big, a tomohawk can be shot from a standard VLS system (fitted on frigates and destroyers). They are somewhat the same size as a SM2 which is a short/medium range force defense missile.

Random encounter: a wild destroyer appears. Boss music starts playing.

@Abbot_Meji

2 жыл бұрын

From the mist, a shape, a ship, is taking form And the silence of the sea is about to drift into a storm.

very good video not everyithing is perfect, there are some minor errors and missconceptions ( especially when it comes to submarines ). but overall...very ,very good video that is giving a great sense of how naval power is structured

Now this is content ! 👍🏽💯

I have to say, I was thinking about doing a document trying to distinguish between ships like cruisers and destroyers. I was thinking about doing some more detail for mine, but I think you did a great job at making sense between it all. And thanks for not using ships designations as a weight class. Kinda drives me batty nowadays when people do that.

I've always searched for a video like this. Love your content

i've heard of all of these boats from strategy war games EXCEPT the corvette. I'm not sure why we don't see more corvettes as they are cheap and basically do everything from long range siege/ anti air/ anti sub warfare. Also I see they can resupply helicopters.

@guyman1570

2 жыл бұрын

Except... corvettes are somewhat ineffective because when you shrink the multi-role ship down in size, you'll hit a point where they don't even have enough space to hold the essentials for each of those roles. So they actually are better off being sole-purpose ships, plus it cuts down the costs considerably.

Destroyers were my favorite in Red Alert, Tiberian Sun, other classic war computer games.

Battleship: “mass destruction heavy armor” Destroyers: “Button go push, ship go boom”

Good background music choices.

@NotWhatYouThink

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks 😅

Best conclusion ever x)

Best explanation so far!

I'm SO glad you guys had a picture of the Halifax-class frigate in this video, it's not seen often as Canada isn't seen by many people as a good or stable military compared to other countries. Please let me know if there is already a video of the Halifax-class on Not What You Think

@abdullahrizwan592

Жыл бұрын

where in the video was it shown?

I’ve always wondered about this

Legendary conclusion you reached there! :)

I miss the grandiose and beauty of battleships. Something about them with the massive amount of power and heavy armour was so majestic.

5:38 "you have become the very thing you swore to destroy"

@ezekiyam3827

3 жыл бұрын

*i know where this comment come from and it doesnt belong here*

@poggersbutthole8444

3 жыл бұрын

I think I saw this comment somewhere

@suhandatanker

2 жыл бұрын

General Kenobi

"Your ship is evolving!" "It evolved to ..... *BIG BLOCK* "

in massive seasz .. spotlights around the ship or bubblersz .. using a foam shield or fold out inflatable drop stitch or extending laterall slatsz or a bubble dome above the ship ... looks like we are starting pretty much at basic

I find it really interesting that the names for the categories of ships are also used in a lot of sci-fi media for space navies.

@redwoodcoaststudio1610

5 ай бұрын

And many of them in the US navy 1790-1830

7:53 Sadly that exact CH-148 Cyclone, tail number 148822, crashed on 29-Apr-2020 while on approach to landing on the Canadian Frigate HMCS Fredericton due to an autopilot issue.

@midnightbluenoz

2 жыл бұрын

ah good old auto pilot, not!

@ianyoung8721

2 жыл бұрын

My heart dropped into my stomach as soon as I saw that number fly across the screen. I had to rewind the video a half dozen times just to be sure I wasn't seeing things. It was like seeing a ghostly face show up in a video.

@huskerbusker

2 жыл бұрын

@@ianyoung8721 😢

@janchovanec8624

2 жыл бұрын

Big RIP to the brave personnel.

definetely the best channel. straight to the point, very informative

can you do a video on all the classes of navy ships not in use any more because i know there are many of them no longer in use that 100-150 years ago were used

Really informative, Thanks.

My great grandfather was the first person in the British Air Force to land a plane on an aircraft carrier.

@omniyambot9876

3 жыл бұрын

ok

@omniyambot9876

3 жыл бұрын

Whole british navy inferior to our Ohio-class alone.

@juicysucculentmeats7437

3 жыл бұрын

Dude that's pretty cool what was his name?

@robroy9793

3 жыл бұрын

Google says his name was Commander Edwin Dunning. Died 5 days later attempting another landing on another ship.

@xXTUCXx1

3 жыл бұрын

@@omniyambot9876 dont know a lot about the RN do you.

I love this channel, great explanations and good content. Keep up the good work man! You deserve more subscribers!

It was very useful, thank you so much.

i’ve been on a cruiser once and it was such an enjoyment looking at the friggots and corvettes!!

Torpedo boat 'destoryers' learning of the origin for the name makes me think of stellaris. A common tactic in that game is to build pretty much entire armadas of torpedo and missile corvettes, one of the only ways to defend against it is to have a screen of a few dozen destoyers covered head to toe with anti-torpedo and missile weapons. They wont win any fights but they'll make sure the corvettes cant wipe half your fleet in the opening volley.

@spikem5950

2 жыл бұрын

Stellaris is basically the entire reason I started getting into learning about naval combat and ship types.

@guyman1570

2 жыл бұрын

Yes! That is the exact same role as to what the torpedo boat destroyers did served back in the day of late Victorian fleets.

@thegamesforreal1673

Жыл бұрын

Didn't they nerf the torpedo corvette strategy pretty hard? Gotta say, it was absolutely hilarious. The AI had not a single clue how to deal with torpedo corvette swarms and it gave me a good chuckle every time.

@spikem5950

Жыл бұрын

@@thegamesforreal1673 I haven't heard of any nerfs to it, that's one of the big reasons NSC2 is so popular because it really diversifies what's in your fleet and makes capital ships worth more than they currently are.

@hoarder1919

11 ай бұрын

@@spikem5950 theyve changed the combat system, they got rid of torpedo corvettes and invented a whole new ship type for that role, frigate. Frigates are now armed with missiles (and neutron launchers go into the guided weapons slot too) and missiles have bonus damages against bigger ships (the bigger the ship, the bigger the damage). but all in all, frigates still suck, dont live long enough to make a dent. Missile cruisers, however, have a new life now, effective all-purpose vessels.

First thing I thought of when torpedo boats were mentioned was the PT boats like on the show McHales Navy. I've always been intrigued by those boats.

also naval ships that cruise longer will mis calculate the shore as being farther than it isz .. i recommend use the forward stabilizer thrusters to arc stop or circle to slow

The iPhone, iPad and iPod comparison was a great one!

@2:19 I love how perfect all the ships are placed so the not a single ship's wake hits any ship near it.

I've been looking everywhere for types of Warships explain in modern warfare, thank you for this great video!

Modern fast attack craft (or missile boats) have much more firepower than older Frigates, and modern multirole corvettes have more firepower than older detroyers. This has made it difficult to compare different types of warships from different times. In the age of sail, a Frigate was a square rigged tall ship that had "full rig", meaning all of her masts had square sails, (four-cornered sails perpendicular to the keel line of the ship). In other common types of tall ships, like barques, brigs and brigantines, the sternmost mast only carried a gaff-rigged mizzen and a few other fore-and-aft rigged sails (sails parallel to the keel line). A corvette was a smaller full-rigged ship.

Perfect i want to know whats the difference between cruisers frigates and destroyers. And oh I noticed you added an Indonesian Corvette thanks! My country usually doesn't get much love or it's not rly known that well