I love that these kind of bonkers theories actually make sense and are feasible. Monster is so, so good.

To the last theory, while I was watching the show and the nameless monster first was told, I felt that Nina was the second nameless monster who was okay with not having a name. It just makes so much sense to the story as well.

@manoknowfish

5 ай бұрын

Same

@outis918

Ай бұрын

It’s representative of how two people deal with trauma differently

@pryce5400

28 күн бұрын

Here's my take. The nameless are the kids. However, as with the history of anime showed. It was Johan who was nameless given he had to pretend he was his sister. He was okay with this. However, where Johan and Nina differ from the nameless monsters is that ultimately they are switched. Given how Johan internalizes Nina's trauma and thinks it was him that experienced it, and how Nina thinks she was the one waiting. Although I think that the eating of the nameless monster is the representation of it. Johan is a lovely name afterall.

Also the scene where Johan has the two acorns letting nina choose when she realises he’s letting her win on purpose, I feel like this was foreshadowing of the mom giving one of the twins away because either they’re both the same or seen as equals and it can be seen as Johan will do anything for his sister, letting her win and have the best of anything/everything.

Man, it really goes to show just how multifaceted this manga was that 3 out of these 5 theories feel like decent readings of the story.

Man I love your Monster videos they are always so incredible. Truly the best of Anitube, no competition.

@SeaGee

6 ай бұрын

Thanks! I love this series so much

Monster nina sound very accurate for me not gonna lie.

@SeaGee

6 ай бұрын

I was real dismissive when I first heard it but honestly totally come around on it now

@PAK_XD

2 ай бұрын

​@@SeaGeeI still didn't get it so Your saying is that nina had a part of brain that didnt wanted those memories so it gave it to yohan ruining his life

@happilyevernever4289

15 күн бұрын

​​@@PAK_XD how does Anna retelling her painful experiences of the Red Rose Mansion with Johan equate to ruining his life? He literally chose to internalise them. It's not like she expected that to happen or wanted that.

All for Nina is cannon in my eyes. Great video love Monster and your channel.

@happilyevernever4289

15 күн бұрын

It makes no sense otherwise.

There's no ambiguity about whether Nina calls him "Johan" at the border; it's just the translator(s) reflexively changing words like onii, ane, etc from direct translations of the words to the addressee's given name. The rest of that theory is fun to think about, though probably the thinnest on substantive evidence. I like the monster Nina theory. I think it looks even clearer on the page that she's saying "I don't want to say... I'm home", at least now that you've pointed it out. I wonder how you'd incorporate that theory with the effects of Bonaparta telling her that she must forget everything she saw that day and that, "Human beings can become anything. You two are beautiful shining jewels. You mustn't become monsters." I think it's crucial that she hadn't communicated that information to Johan, though. If "Monster Nina" is correct, was it intentional? In Nina the monster was successfully submerged thanks to Bonaparta's intervention, but in Johan that intervention never took place.

the goat has returned

@SeaGee

6 ай бұрын

More is coming! Hoping to get into Pluto soon

English is not my language, but I think I know Johan and Nina's real name and that name is Anna for both of them. Let me explain in another moster. Johan's mother had a twin sister who died called Anna and she was traumatized by that. It is very likely that he called them both Anna and in honor of his sister, the story The Monster Awakens is about a child whose name is the same as the most loved person in the world. In this case, the child in the story is Johan and the most loved person. In the world she is Nina whose real name is Anna and like Johan who is also actually called Anna, that is why in the end Johan is completely traumatized since his name has no meaning, all his memories are of his twin sister, his own name. It is the same as his sister's, he has never had nor will he have a name, that is why the author chose twins as the protagonists because twins always have to fight to differentiate themselves from their other twin, but Johan cannot and will never be able to. that's the phrase I am you and you are. Name me if you use my theory I don't want to end up like Johan😉

@happilyevernever4289

15 күн бұрын

It makes no sense for him to also have the name Anna. And where do you find their mother's long dead twin sister?? Seems to me like you made her up. Johan had to adopt Anna's identity in childhood coz their mom figured it'll be easier to evade those dangerous people if she posed as a mother of only a girl. And it was easier to make Johan wear a wig than have Anna get a haircut so often. Also it is very clear that their names Anna and Johan were given to them when they were with the Leiberts. Even tho their mom wanted to give them names when she was pregnant, for some reason she go throught it after giving birth which is why Johan kept telling Anna at the border that they were nameless. Meaning they had to lie and give people different names when they were with their mom and on the run. My real concern is why she chose not to give them names. Did she do it coz she wanted them to be tools of her revenge or was it because it was easier not to get caught that way if her very young kids didn't accidentally slip up by giving their name to the wrong person?

@rafaeldeleon3386

11 күн бұрын

@@happilyevernever4289 The mother's twin was referenced in Another Monster. Although, I am sure you saw that video by now.

I Always liked Johan Johan theory the most. When I read the manga I always viewed Johan as like "reincarnation of pure evil" or something like that. So Johan Johan theory fits my perception of Monster. Your videos are great 😁

@happilyevernever4289

15 күн бұрын

But that was an English mistranslation and doesn't make sense for him to have that name in that scene.

Welcome back , hope u got the rest u needed during the hiatus hope ur well ❤️ amazing video as usual

@SeaGee

5 ай бұрын

Thanks! Excited to get back into some videos

Awesome vid! I really like how you talk about these things, particularly with Monster in this instance, because you explain things in such a way that I always feel like I come away with a better understanding than I’d previously had. So, thank you for that, and great work!

@SeaGee

6 ай бұрын

Cheers! That's really encouraging feedback, thank you

The goat is finally back 🎉🎉

Didn't expect the Myst III soundtrack to fit so well here.

I really missed your videos Sea Thank you ❤

@SeaGee

6 ай бұрын

Thanks! I'm trying to get back onto a more consistent upload schedule so hopefully more coming soon

Yooo bro I don’t wanna bother, but will you do a review on Pluto?

@tbagged1cod283

6 ай бұрын

second this!

@SeaGee

6 ай бұрын

It's on the plan. Got one more video on monster that needs editing. Then one video for a project for next year then it should be Pluto. Probably looking at a late January to get it out depending on how things go

great timing

The return of the king

great theories

dont you think theory number 1 and 5 overlap? johan did everything for nina incluiding the massacre, that hypnosis bit might allude to the fact that the monster deep down her knows johan and her are “the same”, thats the reason of her reaction she doesnt want to be johan, she doesnt want to be alive being the same type of monster that he is meanwhile in the other side johan is the one destroying her world on his own because he knows (he thinks he knows) that she would destroy it on her own if left alone because he still thinks they are the same and he doesn’t want her to live that idk thats what i thought 🦭

great theories tbh

As a monster fan myself these theories are amazing especially the last one

BRO IS BACK

@SeaGee

6 ай бұрын

And hopefully with a more consistent upload schedule

@UkiyoIkou

6 ай бұрын

@@SeaGee LETS GOOOOO

Amazing

A nameless monster

Mind sharing your the names of the music you used?

@SeaGee

5 ай бұрын

Wolf Among Us - Bad Liar Myst 3 - Atrus's Study Res Evil 7 - Floating in Between and Saferoom Theme

Please review pluto anime

@SeaGee

6 ай бұрын

It's coming next year, promise. January is the plan to get a whole series video out

I really wanna know how was the monster of Nina.....

Babe wake up, SeaGee uploaded a new video

I honestly don’t believe the Johan Johan theory, because my perception of the ending is quite complex, and if the Johan Johan theory was true, then it would kind of ruin the show. I believe that Johan is the monster, and not the true name of “Johan”. The monster isn’t inside of Johan, but outside of Johan. And…well…the people that influenced Johan to become a monster aren’t monsters themselves either. The monster in the story is an idea, and not a person. I think when Johan’s true name was given, he realized that he wasn’t a monster after all, giving the best ending I’ve experienced in any work of fiction so far.

😅😅L I Not I I M o m L 😅😅

My 🐐 is back with a banger video yes sirrr 🫡🫡 we bout to EAT

@SeaGee

6 ай бұрын

Got another monster one cooking which I'm hoping to get out by new years