The Rolling Stones Studio Albums Ranked: The 90s and Beyond!
The Rolling Stones try to stay relevant despite decades after they defined rock ‘n’ roll….
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 6
@kevtruth23 күн бұрын
Cool ranking series. I jumped ship after Tattoo You, but your rankings will be a fun watch
@brucefolkerth397821 күн бұрын
You got me listening to Voodoo Lounge again, but it just keeps going and going.
@theopinionatedhippie470
21 күн бұрын
LOL....it definitely could have used some editing.
@brucefolkerth397822 күн бұрын
Ron Wood also? He's on Hackneyed Diamonds.
@theopinionatedhippie470
22 күн бұрын
My bad….i still think of Wood as a new Stone….
@DeanJonasson23 күн бұрын
The albums covered here are too long, too noisy and don't have much to say to me. Instead of exploring where they're coming from in the moment, the songs sound like they're written to formula. They lean heavily upon outside help, giving proceedings an anonymous, corporate vibe. Conversely, BLUE AND LONESOME is the only Stones album from this era that I own and enjoy. Rescued from having to come up with material of their own, the Stones focus on highlighting some pretty great covers. The whole thing is loose, well played, well paced and possesses an intimate studio ambience. The core group (including Leavell, Jones & Clifford) sound like they're jamming in the same room and the few guests (especially Clapton) compliment the sound. The big plus is Mick's committed performance: he's a strong harmonica player and his singing pays respect to the songs (instead of being "Mick Jagger", if that makes any sense). The concept of the band going back to their roots holds the whole thing together. It's the last full album with Charlie. BLUE AND LONESOME is neither a face-plant nor a try-to-hard product like the rest of the albums on this list.
Пікірлер: 6
Cool ranking series. I jumped ship after Tattoo You, but your rankings will be a fun watch
You got me listening to Voodoo Lounge again, but it just keeps going and going.
@theopinionatedhippie470
21 күн бұрын
LOL....it definitely could have used some editing.
Ron Wood also? He's on Hackneyed Diamonds.
@theopinionatedhippie470
22 күн бұрын
My bad….i still think of Wood as a new Stone….
The albums covered here are too long, too noisy and don't have much to say to me. Instead of exploring where they're coming from in the moment, the songs sound like they're written to formula. They lean heavily upon outside help, giving proceedings an anonymous, corporate vibe. Conversely, BLUE AND LONESOME is the only Stones album from this era that I own and enjoy. Rescued from having to come up with material of their own, the Stones focus on highlighting some pretty great covers. The whole thing is loose, well played, well paced and possesses an intimate studio ambience. The core group (including Leavell, Jones & Clifford) sound like they're jamming in the same room and the few guests (especially Clapton) compliment the sound. The big plus is Mick's committed performance: he's a strong harmonica player and his singing pays respect to the songs (instead of being "Mick Jagger", if that makes any sense). The concept of the band going back to their roots holds the whole thing together. It's the last full album with Charlie. BLUE AND LONESOME is neither a face-plant nor a try-to-hard product like the rest of the albums on this list.