What do you reckon Tamron have next up their sleeves?

@drdj69

5 жыл бұрын

What is the Australian price and when is it available in stores?

Just been out and about with this lens, its amazing!!! so sharp!! the colour! contrast!! blurred backgrounds you can get out of it!!

Solid review. Andrew you're great at explainer videos 👍

As a Nikon shooter, I hope Tamron starts to manufacture lenses for the new Z mount soon. Will definitely switch once the next version of Z cameras are introduced.

@mordiscosabroso3223

5 жыл бұрын

Pradhyumna Gupta I have this mounted on the Z6

@abhishekdey1144

5 жыл бұрын

right.. if they produce 17-28 n 28-75, later maybe a 75-200, all 2.8 that would be great for Z series..

@ivansanjaya9718

4 жыл бұрын

Does this lens work well with Z6 + FTZ adapter?

@hagarthehorrible1391

4 жыл бұрын

@@abhishekdey1144 I would love a 17-35 rather than a 17-28. As a wedding photographer that would really help me. Nikon hasn't updated their 17-35 F mount in ages and there's no roadmap for it in the Z mount.

@reinertify5400

4 жыл бұрын

@@mordiscosabroso3223 Yeah, and it works?! Did you have to make the firmware update? I had to do that when I purchased the T 24-70 g2

How much better is it than the Tamron F1.8?

Pretty cool hoodie man makes me wanna make my own too

@nevvanclarke9225

5 жыл бұрын

Noealz Photo the problem is the mirrorless ownership is only 2% of cameras owned. Yup...we keep hearing that mirrorless is future but until ownership of mirrorless goes way up we won’t see a huge investment in mirrorless specific lenses.

should i buy this lens or tamron 24-70 f 2.8

Wonder if this will be their "best" and last DSLR lens with the rise of mirrorless bodies. Nearly 1/2 the price of Canon and Nikon 35mm 1.4s. But still more expensive than the older Sigma. Pricing seems about right.

Has anyone used this and the Sigma 35mm counterpart? How do they compare?

@itzzDizZY

2 жыл бұрын

I haven’t used both but I heard from people who have used both that Tamron is much sharper and doesn’t require calibration every few months. Tamron is also newer lens so more expensive but at the cost of better tech. You can Sigma art for as low as AUD700 at the moment, where Tamron is going to cost you between AUD1100-1300. I bought Tamron, just cuz I prefer images to be sharper without any post processing but again it all comes down to what you prefer and what’s your budget.

Bought for Canon r, used with a native adapter. Auto focus misses. The front focus can be traced. For portrait photography, this is critical, especially in the open. I took it to the official service center, checked it, and confirmed the problem. Changes to the result were not postponed. For this pair, no explanation was given as to what to do in such a situation. In General, the problem was not solved.

I agree about the image stabilization, George, but it would have driven up the price considerably.

@ChrisM-yq2pq

5 жыл бұрын

sid vicious IS on a 35? You only need to shoot at 1/35 of a second to hold lens steady.

@ChrisM-yq2pq

5 жыл бұрын

Not only cost but increase size of lens. It’s kind of not reasonable when people who do these videos think that every lens should have everything. They aren’t the ones buying or using it. It has to be usable in the hand and still fit your bag of gear without killing you in price and size

@onthemoverealestatephotogr9655

4 жыл бұрын

Why would you need IS on a 35?

Tamrons best lens by far is the venerable 15/30 g2.

@beslemeto

4 жыл бұрын

You obviously bought 15-30 G2.That is why you claim is better than 35 f1.4.

@onthemoverealestatephotogr9655

4 жыл бұрын

The 15-30 G2 is the only Tamron lens I’ve ever owned, but I can tell you it is spectacular especially on the D850.

как раз выбираю 35 мм. спасибо за видео

What is with the I.S disappointment?? if you can't take a steady photo with a 35mm!! you have something wrong with your hands :)

@pauliedontsurf

4 жыл бұрын

its for video...

This lens does not vignette at 35mm adapted to an EOS R at 1.4 or stopped down raw.

Can I use it for video?Autofocus for video?

i own it. It is fantastic! super fast lense. I didn't notice any vignetting on my copy however. It had super consistent focusing. shooting at 1.4 in different ranges and angles never failed. I even did a night shoot and had accurate results! I think this crowns over the Sigma.

@mordiscosabroso3223

5 жыл бұрын

Eugene Marrero agree, I have this mounted on the Z6 since I have the F adapter and this cost $50 less than the Nikon 1.8 S for Z mount. The lens is sharp and produces a beautiful bokeh.

@senalirving

5 жыл бұрын

@@mordiscosabroso3223 awesome! I plan to get a z6. I just worry about the Tamron 90 2.8 not working on it. Hopefully Tamron makes z series soon

@jamesjackson4264

4 жыл бұрын

Eugene Marrero tamron should hit this market soon. Right now they worried about the Sony market.

@senalirving

4 жыл бұрын

@@jamesjackson4264 Yeah they took a while. but once they are able make it compatible, it will be awesome.

@christianlocke6585

4 жыл бұрын

Guys This les or the tamron 35 1.8 Sp?

You probably should test the lens on better bodies. This lens truly delivers insane image quality. On my D850 I hardly could notice higher resolution stopping down. Insane sharpness at f1.4 even shooting distant subjects. Corner sharpness is the best I've seen on any 1.4 lens wide open. Cannot recommend it highly enough for high res. bodies. CAs wide open are extremely well reduced and focusing accuracy is awesome on the d850.

So should i buy this one or 15-30 G2?

@onthemoverealestatephotogr9655

4 жыл бұрын

I have the 15-30 G2 and love it for what I use to it for (real Estate photography). It’s super heavy though.

Seems to be a cool lens but no IS and made for DSLR. But I must test it. Cool video but kill that logo animation please 😂🤪

@DEGAtv

5 жыл бұрын

Forreal lol

This or the sigma art 35 f1.4?

@jepmaningo7770

5 жыл бұрын

Definitely tamron. My friend just bought the Sigma 35 f1.4 art and he regretted it so much because of poor focus at wide open

@professionaI_yapper

5 жыл бұрын

@@jepmaningo7770 If he plans on keeping it. Tell him to get the dock and do the painfully tedious micro adjustment test for each distance. They are not good straight out of the box.

@jepmaningo7770

5 жыл бұрын

@@professionaI_yapper he'll sell it. Too bad a week after he bought it tamron released the 1.4 version. I told myself I'll never ever buy any Sigma again.

@jamesjackson4264

4 жыл бұрын

David H painful it is. I don’t understand why people keep doing it.

@swiftstraw8856

4 жыл бұрын

Tamron...all day, every day. The Sigma is known to have some focusing issues.

This is a studio len and definitely won't carry this monster len for holiday.

@morgenholz

3 жыл бұрын

weakling

How does the Tamron 35mm f1.4 compare to the Tamron f1.8?

@miljo2146

4 жыл бұрын

Way better. Have both on my D850. The 1.4 wide open outperforms the 1.8 stopped down. Insane resolution, sharpest lens I've ever used. Autofocus accuracy is awesome, almost no CAs wide open on the d850. Unbelievable

@taylorneal8050

3 жыл бұрын

@@miljo2146 Is it worth losing the VC like the 1.8 version??

@miljo2146

3 жыл бұрын

@@taylorneal8050 On my 1.8 copy I felt like the VC wasn't as good as with the newer tamron lenses. I would say it depends if you're shooting a lot of low light. In that occasion the 1.8 will still have an advantage over the 1.4.

''On a really tight budget.'' What does that mean exactly. Others are better if you're willing to pay more? What other's? Another favorite expression of reviewers is ''For the price.'' Same thing, what does that mean? The higher priced equivalents are better? Why not just come out and say that?

The Tamron with Nikon mount is actually better than the one with the Canon mount. Much sharper! It even sounds better! This has nothing to do with my dislike for Canon. No for real I am totally not biased😆😆😆😆

Fraction of a price? Everything is a fraction like 99/100. Or you could mean something to the tune of 1/4 or less. But at only 1/2 the price of the EF 35mm 1.4 L II, not really a huge deal or at the inferred fraction of the price.

First

@GRJCLyon

5 жыл бұрын

Rich Visuals who gives a shit?

@billmoyer3254

5 жыл бұрын

stfu

second

you talk a lot but there are no portraits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

this a typical bullsh*t review............... this is the best lens !!! ... colour rendition, rendering, chromatic aberration its all 100% ,,, bonafide future proof !!

1080p Tech Review. Such a shame

@64viji

5 жыл бұрын

🤷🤷

@billmoyer3254

5 жыл бұрын

you whining pos

@lmsorenson8503

5 жыл бұрын

Who cares....?

I've purchased this lens, so far not loving it.

@Vlaakster

5 жыл бұрын

Can you be more specific?

@jepmaningo7770

4 жыл бұрын

Please explain

@jamesjackson4264

4 жыл бұрын

Trolling.

@rsmith_aus1371

4 жыл бұрын

Then you're using it wrong..

@dannyklesh

4 жыл бұрын

Such BS watch the Christopher Frost lens review and you can see this lens rivals the 1.2 35 art only for Sony e mount which is the sharpest 35mm available