I know its late, but I got a game of commander under these rules to work. Running removal is pretty strong, but feels fair VS the really strong Rulestext pokemon Pokemon has a BUNCH of tutors so playing "MTG good stuff with a 3 card tutor every turn" is really strong There are a number of cards that need to be banned like everflowing challice because they cause people to not engage with the mechanic of pokemon, we houseruled "Any card that kills more than one pokemon and nothing else, or prevents them being cast is banned"

@RedBobcatGames

2 ай бұрын

OH MY GOD! This is amazing news! Most importantly, was it fun? Did you all have a good time?! And who built the decks? Did you all know what you were bringing or did you each surprise each other?! This is maybe the best thing to have come from my entire channel so far! Thank you!

@emilywilliamikaricullenree9590

2 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames So we had three of us play, I was running a Graveyard deck with Eevee's as support using Muldrotha as my commander. The other two both ran very similar decks using pokemon to trigger Prowess and relying on strong pokemon to work as big beatsticks to swing in and game end. One used Elsha of the Infinite and the other Narset, Enlightened Exile but both ended up running very similar cards that made creature tokens on non creature spell cast. As for lands, I was running 39 lands and using Muldrotha's ability to return lands spend on retreet cost or dead pokemon or self milling. The Narset player used only 25 lands and used pokemon that searched for energy or had low energy costs to get by, whilst the Elsha player had a whopping 50 lands! All the decks where a surprise, but it was known I was running eevee's as we asked how to handle the singleton nature of commander in regards to pokemon, we decided on a hyrbrid rule, each pokemon that has diffrent rules text is a diffrent instance, but you can only have 4 pokemon that share a name. So you can't have 4 Eevee's from one set, but you can have 4 eevee's total. We all built our own decks and played in tabletop simulator, I used the custom card function to give pokemon cards MTG card backs, the Narset player used a command on the tapletop workshop we used to give her cards all the pokemon card backs, and the Elsha player played with card backs visible, none of it made an effective diffrence on gameplay We all agreed we had a good time, and are currently disccussing rule changes to make it more fair. The game ended in my victory using an abrupt decay on a rulestext mon to take my vfinal two prizecards and theres some concern over "run all removal" becoming the meta which pushes pokemon out the format. Never thought I'd see the day that Commander players are playing too MUCH removal! One of the biggest changes was we ended up having turns that where "Pokemon TCG but they have counterspell" in which a normal pokemon turn would occer and do something incredibly powerful, only to be curtailed by a bounce spell or removal or as the name suggests, a counterspell. That was definatly a highlight!

@RedBobcatGames

2 ай бұрын

@@emilywilliamikaricullenree9590 This all sounds so amazing! I'm glad you all had fun though. If you play again let me know how it goes, and any quirks your playtesting finds. All removal commander decks would be wild!

I think Nintendo will leave you alone, unless you shout "Itsa me!" at the start of your turn

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Sorry, that's rule one

Electric being White is just plain wrong. Electric should be Red, just like Lightning Bolt. Electricity is clearly depicted as belonging to Red in Magic. To make up for it, Fairy should be White, (yes, I know that "fairies live in the forest," but seriously, are you going to tell me that Blissey, Sylveon, Jigglypuff, and the all the other pink Pokemon are any color in Magic other than White?) and Fighting should be moved down to Green. The only one of those changes that I'm a little iffy on is Fighting, since Fighting Pokemon tend to be rage-filled and have a strong fighting spirit, which is kinda' Red, but Green also has a lot of rage going on, and "fight" effects in Magic are literally Green, plus fighting types tend to be big, and Green has the biggest creatures, so since we need to move something to make room for Electric in Red, fighting makes the most sense. Also, a lot of Ground/Rock types were made into Fighting in the Pokemon TCG, and Green suits them better. I'd also argue for potentially moving Psychic into Blue, since mind effects are usually Blue, but since the Pokemon TCG also kinda' merged Psychic and Ghost like they did with fighting and ground, I can see it in Black, too. Blue is overpowered, anyway.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

These are all very good points. I cannot disagree with any of them. I may rework the rules at some point. For instance, Wastes are Basic Lands, which doesn't really do the same as Double Energy cards in Pokémon. It's a work in progress, good job! I'm glad I'm not the only one that thinks about things like this

and then someone breaks the game using golbat to spread damage counters on all your pokemon before increasing proliferating them like poison counters

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Oh there's going to be a million ways to break this haha. I think it's a game of who can be the most broken fastest tbh

I'd call it Magémon: The Catchering. Gotta preserve that awkward é. I'd have done the rules quite differently as well, but I like the concept.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

What would you have done different? You know, in like 20 words or less or whatever. I'm not asking you to have to write an essay haha

@JervisGermane

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames In short, I'd have translated them a little more, made them official creatures but behaving like planeswalkers like you did. 1) Their attacks would be a cross between a planeswalker's loyalty abilities and an activated ability. 2) Lands would still function like lands, so you could tap a forest for a green mana or a grass energy, for example. Pokémon energy cards would function like lands too, so you could tap a grass energy for a green mana or a grass energy. 3) I'd have assigned the types differently. White - Normal, Fairy. Blue - Water, Psychic. Black - Darkness, Metal. Red - Fire, Lightning. Green - Grass, Fighting. Colorless - Normal only. Multi - Whatever matches.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

@@JervisGermane Yeah, good thoughts. I guess I was trying to avoid letting land double up, as when a Pokémon is knocked out, the land attached goes with it. But also, I guess that could add a level of risk reward too. Would you still allow only 1 land a turn? Or do what I did, and allow a free attach to a Pokémon?

@JervisGermane

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames1 land per turn, counting energies, and they wouldn't attach. They'd both behave like Magic lands already do. Your Pikachu's Volt Tackle would be an activated ability costing 1RR in Magic terms. It could only be used once per turn and could only target your opponent's active Pokémon, but you'd pay the activation cost with any combination of two Red mana and Electric energy plus 1 generic mana/energy of any type

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

@@JervisGermane I feel there's too many Pokémon cards that talk abouit attaching energy though. Even Raichu in that video does damage based on the number of Energy attached. Would you account for that or not worry?

Supposedly the reason palwaorld isn't being sued is because it's creatively distinct. If Pokémon wished to sue they could have in the past 3 years when it was in development. But also because seeing them is bad for perspective being oh hey Pokémon is a game with guns and killing like palworld.

@rosecooldude1024

5 ай бұрын

Also Pokémon and Nintendo have both said they want people to stop spamming them about palworld.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, nintendo's pretty litigious too. If they were going to sue I suspect they'll have done it already. As for me on the otherhand...

Honestly Palworld is like a solid 7/10 for an openworld survival crafting. Like my biggest gripe with it is the pathfinding on the pals

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, I hope the AI art accusations turn out to be false, cos that'll suck if so

There is a lot of hilarity in this if you're old enough to remember that WotC was the original creators of the pokemon card game. (hence why it's so much like mtg in the first place) Oh yes i was there, children.... 👴

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

I was there too. I had no idea what Magic the Gathering was though, and like a lot of kids I had Pokémon cards, but no idea clue how to play. Oh how times have changed

@simplegarak

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames "While you were twiddling with energy cards I was mastering mana to crush the brass section and bring glory to the wood winds!" lol (ah the fun we had doing multiplayer before commander was invented)

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

First multiplayer game I ever played, I had a Vampire Tribal deck with 4 copies of Anowon, the Ruin Sage in it. People hated me

@Chiffonaise

5 ай бұрын

It's a pretty common misconception but WOTC aren't the original creators of Pokémon TCG. The game is designed by a company called Creatures Inc. It's actually the first Japanese developed TCG. The 3 lead designers at the time were previously involved in the development of EarthBound. The game is inspired by MTG, but I think that's something one could say for any TCG. WOTC was brought in to localize, publish and distribute the game in the west because of their expertise in trading card games and organized play. They were forbidden from creating their own cards or modifying the game rules themselves, but they eventually allowed them to for Jamboree. The set was cancelled because their license was revoked, but the cards WOTC designed were included in later sets according to a recent investigation.

@simplegarak

5 ай бұрын

@@Chiffonaise interesting. Thanks!

I can understand why trainer cards aren't allowed in the duel. There are trainer cards that are essentially cards like wheel of fortune and ancient recall that just play thmselves for free.

@RedBobcatGames

Ай бұрын

See, I do want to add them though. Maximum chaos!

Watch Wizzards do this they can make it into a battle type that you control after watching Rysthic studies video on foils its not the first time either company has taken inspiration from eachother. one of the big problems I had with the battles in March of the machines was that they never felt good to attack. Because if you attacked them early you must be a somewhat agro deck so you are losing tempo and making your clock quite a bit slower, but if you are a control or midrange deck attacking battles was just a win more move since you must already be ahead on board or tempo and it gives you another creature or tool to keep winning which you where already doing. This was not such a problem in the limited environment but in constructed might be the reason they never saw competitive play since win more cards are not the best for such formats. If I was to think of designing them for MTG I would make it so they either all have tap abilities or mana abilities or both because giving up on land drops is the worst most decks are built with the idea of being able to draw the right amount of cards relative to their mana curve so giving up on lands might make the mechanic dead on arrival since you are giving up on land drops to get your pokebattles to do their thing. but to give them something to do you could add a level up mechanic to the them making them stronger giving them more abilites and making them indestructible creatures that can only be destroyed when the damage piles up. to add to the prize card mechanic can be changed around for the battles you control if defeated to be flipped around to give your opponents resources while removing some of your own some resources This video has shown me battles still have untapped potential and they could be really cool if they revisit and reinvent the card type.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, in fact if I remember rightly Wizards actually printed the first run of Pokémon cards back in the day. Makes me wonder how much influence they had over them at the time

pretty good! I have some notes, though. 1.in the pokemon tcg, pokemon CAN attack the turn they're played. It's possible you're confusing it for a rule saying that, on the very first turn of the game, your pokemon can't attack 2. can I play trainer cards? 3. I feel like some magic cards are too powerful to play against pokemon. 4. You're not stealing though, those are real pokemon cards that you legally obtained and are just repurposing. Stealing would be proxies.

@RedBobcatGames

Ай бұрын

So 1, yeah. Though I think I was more saying that so that Pokémon would work more like creatures in magic. If they can attack turn one, there's not much from stopping you playing a massive pokémon your first turn and then dealing more than 20 damage straight away. 2. No trainer cards yet, but I may come back and do a follow up video because I do have ideas (feel free to house rule this if you like though and want to play yourself) 3. Agreed, but that's half the fun. Removal becomes A LOT more powerful in this format. 4. And yeah, fair point. I'm not sure Nintendo would see it that way though...

What happens if you don’t draw a Pokémon to start?

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Nothing. There's no penalty to not having a Pokémon on the board. They are VERY powerful though, but also have a massive risk if you run them. The rules are up for free on my Patreon if you want to know more

Pokémon having removal that targets cards on your bench but doesnt award prize cards for doing so made this incredibly disorienting. especially when, for some reason, exile removal didn't award prize cards(???) Pokémon has multiple ways to send Pokémon to the lost zone when they're defeated, so it's totally normal to take prize cards for such a thing.

@RedBobcatGames

5 күн бұрын

Well, see the difference is that those Pokémon where defeated, then exiled. Like a Magic card that dies and goes to exile instead of the graveyard. It's not quite the same as just exiling something. LIke you wouldn't get a "When a creature dies" trigger for exiling it. It's the same sort of thing to my mind

I think if you put a unique skin over all of the stuff like Palworld did, you could easily sell this game.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

I'll do something totally original. Like a Mimic Pikachu. I'll call him Mimikyu!

@ren_suzugamori1427

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames that's already a thing, you 1 + 1Red 1/1 Goblin!

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

That's the best thing I've ever been called

knights diying on the battlefield watching a pokemon getting "knocked out" : 😐

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Haha, yeah I suppose I could argue that Pokémon can be downloaded into balls and uploaded to cloud storage boxes, so they don't die because they're digital? But artifacts can still die. Are there any Holograms in Magic? I'm thinking too much into this

@TylerMKimball

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames There's got to be something like a hologram monster/enchantment in Kamigawa Neon Dynasty.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

@@TylerMKimball Oh I suppose spirits in general are pretty close. And they can die. Still, probably better Pokémon are only "Knocked out". A lot of kids gonna be at Lavender Town's Pokémon Tower otherwise

This sounds like it uses a lot of lands to use as energy also - and when my first thought is what shenanigans would let me abuse this weakness it might be a problem. Shenanigans: self mill. Ranumap excavator and its ilk may or may not let me use land in my graveyard as energy; but even if he doesn't it'll just let me use the actual lands in my hand as energy - and any energy that gets discard from pokemon would just be in a position to be played as lands! If I'm already playing self mill that just adds more shenanigans. After all; who's going to argue that if pokemon is a new type that I can't play pokemon from my graveyard with Muldrotha?

@RedBobcatGames

2 ай бұрын

I mean, I guess no one. This entire format could be called "Maximum Shenanigans"

As a kitchen style game, I honestly feel this would be fun. My gut says it be very unbalanced but I feel a little bit of commander rule zero in this game and house rules to cover edge cases, that this be very silly fun for card game fans

@RedBobcatGames

4 ай бұрын

That's exactly my thoughts too. I expect wild games where things get crazy quickly

So, are you going to take this idea and make it its own card game? Cause if you dont, this has the start of one. Like a side deck of hero cards and the main deck veing comprised of minions and spells to assist the heros. That or maybe its all in one big deck where if you dont draw a hero yoh must mulligan till you open a hero to start the game. Just going to say it. This sounds like a really good card game idea.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Ayyyyy! Someone who thinks like me! I'm not doing anything with the idea outside of posting dumb videos here on KZread. Feel free to do with it as you will if you like, and if you play this or make your own version, let me know how it goes

I’ve never heard the “H” in hp pronounced so distinctly.

@partyballoonsnorwich2122

5 ай бұрын

I like your H's 🤩

@Breakstop

5 ай бұрын

@@partyballoonsnorwich2122 oh me too for sure, after my American ears adjusted.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

@Breakstop Haha, thank you? I went back and listened to myself and had you not said anything I'd never of thought anything of it.

@Breakstop

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames gotta love cultural exchange. Big fan of the channel you’re building here. Thanks for the fun videos.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

@@Breakstop Thank you for the comments and support. I've had a cold all week and morale is low, so it means a lot

ok on first thought I was like yeah this is fine and fun, but pokemon has suddenly become a lot stronger than I remember... That pikachu + zekron being able to deal 20 dmg for only 3 energy is just... damn...

@RedBobcatGames

4 ай бұрын

Right? It's mad over there now. But also if you knock it out with a simple 2 mana removal spell you get to draw 3 prize cards, 50% of your win total. So... balanced?

@nagsorinaste5658

4 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames ig in a way, you can also block it if I got the rules correctly, since it doesn't have trample. But I see the format warping around cards that say nonland permanent xD Archmages charm 3 mana steal your fully merged powerful pokemon... Boromir/lavinia that say counter spells if no mana was spent to cast them etc. With so much possible hate, maybe it is balanced...

@RedBobcatGames

4 ай бұрын

This was my thinking. It's so broken and over the top, but in equal messaure for both players. One thing though, I genuinly never thought about what happens when you steal your opponents Pokémon. Maybe it just goes to your bench, and if it can't you have to sacrifice down till you have the right number

@nagsorinaste5658

4 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGamessounds reasonable, also pokemon on the bench being "knocked out"/sacrificed doesn't count towards the rpice cards right? also if you have more than 7 pokemon , can you still cast them but have to sac another or how does that work? bc I thought a way to "abuse" the 0 mana cost might be a form of jeskai ascendency/whirlwind of thought/paradoxical outcome storm deck for nonvintage formats that don't have that many 0 costs, just a thought tho traditional storm is prbl better, bc of mana generation. although with cloudstone curio you have an easy combo route that you don't have with other 0 costs, since they are most often artifacts

@RedBobcatGames

4 ай бұрын

So, if your opponent knocks out a pokémon, even one on the bench they get to draw a prize card. They don't if it's gone for any other reason like self sacrifice or it being exiled etc. They are being "cast" so storm decks could abuse them, but they don't have "death triggers" because they don't technically "die", they are just "knocked out" (which is the same thing mechanically, just no trigger so less abuseable). Is that fair or balanced? i honestly have no idea haha

My first thing is, Pokémon tools, items, supporters and such aren't included. But other than that I think it's really funny and interesting

@RedBobcatGames

2 күн бұрын

Thank you. I do want to get to those, but even just getting the Pokémon themselves to function was a lot of work my end so I focused on those. Hopefully at some point I'll have time to do a follow up

@arinodonichi7928

2 күн бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames I'd be happy to help with that. I already have some ideas swimming around in my head based on your skeleton you layed out here

@RedBobcatGames

Күн бұрын

I've got just a ridiculous amount of stuff on my plate, but if you want to run with this and expand on it or whatever you have my blessing. Even if you want to upload videos on it or whatever feel free

While fun if you and a friend already have pokemon cards lying around, I do think it is very jank for the following reasons: Cost differences: in its most basic form, pokemon have 0 cmc, this makes them extremely susceptible to a specific set of cards (chalice of the void, nix, ratchet bomb etc) in addition to drawing you opponent prize cards. This means that it pokemon are extremely vulnerable if your opponent wants to destroy them. Stat differences: On the other hand, pokemon, for being free, are exceedingly chonky, I don't know if the example game is the normal pokemon power curve, or if some of them have powerful yet useful effects, however I assume that there are at least a few pokemon that are disproportionally useful just like magic cards (something like: Draw cards, then discard trainer cards). This chonkyness also further pushes away from damage, as a number of colors have multiple 1-0 mana removal options for pokemon, or 2-3 mana repeatable/whipe options. Doing so is also extremely advantageous since these cards will redraw themselves. A win condition reliant on your opponent: Basically, to get all the prize cards, you need to nock out a number of your opponents pokemon. If this is your main plan, your opponent can decide to stop playing pokemon and instead focus on the mtg aspects, maybe looting away most pokemon. (Also, does your opponent still get a price if you sacrifice your pokemon, to claw of gix for example?) And finally the resource split: If you want to play mtg cards, you will need to try and keep up with playing out a land per turn, if you want to play pokemon cards, you will need to dedicate your land cards to your pokemon. Unless you have two times the normal card draw somehow, keeping up with both would be unviable, so either, you need to accept that pokemon will only have 1-2 energy under normal conditions, and you will only have 2-3 land on the field, or you will need to drop either conventional mtg cards, relying fully on pokemon, or rely fully on mtg cards, defeating the points (except for helping out mill and making tutor toolbox/combo decks worse, as they might get part of their urza's saga package in the prize zone.) Overall, I like the idea, however the games don't really like existing side by side. I like the way you made them share resources, however it will also make them cut each other off

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

I mean, yeah to basically everything you said. I think that's the beauty of it though. It is jank, and you'll end up running cards you normally never would. Exactly like old school commander used to be. I also suspect you're right, and the decks will need A LOT more land search options than normal. But, I think (or at least hope) it will balance itself out. For instance, you're right than once you've KOed 5, you're opponent shouldn't play any more Pokémon. BUT if half your deck is about playing Pokémon, you may not have an option. You're also right that it's not Magic, or Pokémon, but very much it's own (terrible abomination) thing as well. Oh, and to answer your question. No, your opponent only draws a prize card if they are the ones to knock out your Pokémon. Sacrificing one, like Exile does nothing. The (poorly written) rules are up for free on my Patreon if you wanna see more Good comment though! Pleasure to read

Dragon energy could easily be produced by blue mana as well if you are playing with those

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

See, I thought about that. But doesn't Dragon Energy represent every colour, but only for Dragon Types?

@ThatTarkur

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames as far as I know from my poor memory is that dragon energy is just an energy type for dragon types like fairy energy. I'll give it a google in abit but I think its just a basic energy type

@ThatTarkur

5 ай бұрын

"Dragon-type Energy in Pokemon TCG was a special type of energy card specifically used to power Dragon-type Pokemon's attacks. It was represented by a unique symbol on the card, distinguishing it from other types of energy, such as Fire, Water, Grass, and so on." -Firestorm games

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

@@ThatTarkur Been a while since I've played, but I'm pretty certain it had special rules. I may be wrong though, I haven't touched Pokémon since they switched to the new online version and deleted the old game

@VanymStorm

Ай бұрын

@@ThatTarkur Okay well that article is just plain wrong. There are no Dragon type energy cards, and no attack costs use the symbol.

I'll politely ignore the fact that decimate means "to remove a tenth" and not "to reduce to a tenth"

@RedBobcatGames

8 күн бұрын

Now, I've read this and know that you are correct. Which makes me wonder what I've possibly said in this video that I needed to be corrected on. Did I make that mistake? That's disappointing haha

@Feranogame

8 күн бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames "Pokémon need to be decimated" with all attacks and HP or whatever having the last zero removed (divided by 10, or reduced to a tenth). Doesn't really change the video at all lol but it is pretty funny considering how imposing the sentence sounds

@RedBobcatGames

8 күн бұрын

Ahhh, yeah so what's happened there is, I've thought to myself "The sentence Pokémon Need to be Decimated is pretty funny, I'll say that" and then stopped thinking about it haha

I made a ton of custom cards for a Pokemon Fusion set of MTG cards, which is a fun time.

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Oh that's cool. So mtg Characters on Pokémon cards?

Hell Yeah, I'd play this! I'd think there'd be a 2nd energy only deck that u can choose which to draw from at upkeep ...but Hella Nice!

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Thank you. I put a bunch of work into this video and it got tanked by the algorithm. I'm glad the few that watch are appriciating it

@foyoGames

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames The algorithm is what really matters, but this is some of that REAL content for the Real Heads. It sucks that channels have to private 90% of their videos to appease the algorithm. ...Speaking of that, I better go ahead and download this video now. Keep up the brilliant work!

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Haha, thank you. No worries

@foyoGames

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames yw

Definitely want to play this at some point 😁

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

I imagine it's a nightmare, but hopefully a funny one at least

This is a fun idea, would love to try it out some time

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Whay Pokémon would you run?

@charlieread7097

5 ай бұрын

@RedBobcatGames I don't know, always been a fan of charizard but I don't know what else

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

@@charlieread7097 I can see Charizard in a burn deck. Lots of quick fire spells like Lightning Bolt. Though, maybe fire themed cards would feel more appropriate

Pretty amusing concept.

@RedBobcatGames

Ай бұрын

Thank you. I've tried it and it's crazy but in a fun way

Good video

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Thank you very much

I realy like what you do

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

Thank you very much. I just wish more people could see it. The algorithm has really tanked this vid haha, which is a shame because I put a lot of work into it

@callumbyrne4263

5 ай бұрын

I shared it arround with a few groups i'm in to. Are we getting a top non mana rocks in magic at any point? @@RedBobcatGames

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

@@callumbyrne4263 Ha, thank you very much. I hope they liked it! Actually the video for the 26th is another Top 8. It's... well they're all sort of crazy but this one is more of that. You're the first person I've told!

@callumbyrne4263

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames I do like a numberd list

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

@@callumbyrne4263 This is youtube! Everyone does haha

Im copying you! So sue me! 😆

@RedBobcatGames

5 ай бұрын

SEE YOU IN COURT!

@partyballoonsnorwich2122

5 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames 🤣🤣🤣

am i the only one here who just also wants broken trainer cards 😂, a professors research would be awesome and break the game but im sure there’s a way to have it have a cost? nah i think ur game is better but the idea of broken trainer cards in comparison to magic’s slow gameplay in comparison is really funny to me to combine

@theguitarassassin6639

4 ай бұрын

WAIT ARCEUS V STAR SEARCHES FOR 2 CARDS, if i ever happen to have that and play this im def abusing that

@theguitarassassin6639

4 ай бұрын

WAIT PT 2, does combat end ur turn like in pokemon or no? cuz if it doesn’t then a card like zacian v from sword and shield base set literally just draws u 3 cards a turn for free lmfao

@RedBobcatGames

4 ай бұрын

Yeah, no combat doesn't end your turn. And I thought about trainer cards, honestly I wouldn't do anything different. 1 Stadimum between you, only 1 trainer a turn etc etc. Go nuts I think (and let me know the results in case I make a follow up video. We can see how it went and "perfect" the rules)

@theguitarassassin6639

4 ай бұрын

@@RedBobcatGames honestly i might just play pokemon with counterspells then, i do wanna try this out

@RedBobcatGames

4 ай бұрын

Do it!